"Life Without Buckley v. Valeo," by John Samples
"How the decision did and did not change the world."
"How the decision did and did not change the world."
The video is the latest example of federal immigration authorities labeling anyone who opposes them a "domestic terrorist."
"What social science can tell us."
"Buckley v. Valeo confines campaign finance regulation to actual corruption, rather than amorphous claims about 'undue influence.'"
The Order raises the inference that his actions were targeted for their message; without the Order, there would have been a much stronger inference that he was prosecuted just for the illegal fire lighting (in violation of valid park safety regulations).
After Google refused to take down a video of him, the Kentucky senator suggested upending the legal framework undergirding the internet for three decades.
"Despite sustained criticism from all sides, Buckley's core principle persists: government cannot ration political speech."
"truth is an absolute defense."
FIRE condemned the police visit: "This blatant overreach is offensive to the First Amendment."
"The core First Amendment principles of Buckley v. Valeo endure after fifty years."
The introduction to an Institute for Free Speech symposium, which I'll be cross-posting over the next couple of weeks.
Excluding generative AI from Section 230 could stymie innovation and cut off consumers from useful tools.
The constitutionally anomalous status of broadcasting invites government meddling.
So holds a court, reversing student Guy Christensen's "disenrollment." The student also wrote, responding to the murder of two Israeli embassy employees in D.C. outside the Capital Jewish Museum, "I do not condemn the elimination of those two Zionist officials."
"I will not allow a generation of smart and capable young women to sell their bodies online," said Republican gubernatorial hopeful James Fishback.
The case helps illustrate why the legal rules surrounding when parties can litigate under pseudonyms are so important.
Every federal circuit court that has considered the issue, including the one covering Florida, has upheld a First Amendment right to monitor and record the police.
Trump's second term lurches forward, powered by monarchical authoritarianism
Mayday.Health ads that direct people to an informational website about abortion access are deceptive advertising and must be banned, the state argues. That’s unconstitutional, counters Mayday.
A federal district court rules that the case should go back to Minnesota state court, rather than being in federal court.
"The substantial public interests implicated by questions of the proper scope of Executive power and the statutory limits on access to tax information warrant public disclosure. While this case, and ... this decision, are now unsealed, the underlying Application and its supporting materials will remain under seal, at least while the investigation remains active ...."
So a Fourth Circuit panel held today, vacating the defendant's convictions from 2005.
An Eleventh Circuit panel concludes (by a 2-1 vote) that this is likely the right result.
Ten Frenchmen were given fines, jail time, and social media bans for accusing their first lady of being a pedophilic gay man.
In an interview with Reason, CNN's Scott Jennings recounts the conversation he had with the tech entrepreneur about his distaste for exorbitant government spending.
at least when the dispute is over a simple identification error./
unconstitutionally compels speech, says the Eighth Circuit federal court of appeals.
Plaintiff claims his actual offenses were a curfew violation during 2020 protests and spitting on FBI agent.
So concludes a federal district in Louisiana, disagreeing with a Ninth Circuit panel.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanksEvery dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interestedSo much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanksPush back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not todayBack journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksBack independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksSupport journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksYour support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanksDonate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks