Russian Opera Singer Anna Netrebko's National Origin Discrimination Lawsuit Over Firing by N.Y. Metropolitan Opera Can Go Forward
So a federal judge held Tuesday, reversing its contrary decision from last year.
So a federal judge held Tuesday, reversing its contrary decision from last year.
Christian artist Sean Feucht has been forced to find new venues for all six of his most recent shows in Canada.
X has begun restricting content related to Gaza for its U.K. users, and Reddit has implemented age-verification measures to view posts about cigars.
The campus' settlement with the federal government is bound to create free speech headaches.
"he must do so under his true name and accept the risk that certain unflattering details may come to light over the course of the litigation."
Occupational licensing can be useless, harmful—and even a threat to free speech.
Too many government officials see dissent as the worst crime imaginable.
As a minority FCC member during the Bush administration, Carr condemned government interference with newsroom decisions.
A federal court concluded the official was entitled to qualified immunity in a case that united two unlikely allies.
Not enough to get pseudonymity for plaintiff's employment discrimination claim, at least in S.D. Tex.
Plus: Trump’s "woke AI" order, Gawker’s cultural legacy, and a listener question on deregulation and the BBB.
Two Venezuelan women were convicted of incitement to hatred, treason, and terrorism.
Chairman Brendan Carr thinks his agency should strive to ensure that news coverage is fair and balanced—a role precluded by the First Amendment.
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals has placed minor restraints on the government’s ability to impose gag orders on secret subpoenas issued to tech companies.
Plus: The Columbia settlement as a "blueprint" for going after other universities, South Park lampoons Trump, and more...
The STOP HATE Act wants social media platforms to report their moderation policies and outcomes to the government. And it’s not the only censorial measure Rep. Josh Gottheimer wants.
Politicians' interest in controlling the content you see shifts from public media to social media.
When even Keith Olbermann is providing a much-needed sanity check, it says something.
Senate Bill 771 would fine platforms up to $1 million if their algorithms relay hate speech to users.
The investigation comes only two days after a federal judge cast doubt on the Trump administration’s argument in Harvard’s lawsuit over federal funding.
The city of Allentown has spent more than $2 million settling excessive force claims, and yet the police still crack down on civilians exercising their constitutional rights.
So a federal judge held yesterday, acknowledging that the government may refuse to fund abortions, but concluding that the exclusion of funding to affiliates unconstitutionally violates their rights of expressive association.
The government's gaslighting strategy suggests that federal officials are not confident about the constitutionality of punishing students for expressing anti-Israel views.
High school student gets correction of school records, $20K, and public apology for "mischaracterization of racial bias."
Plus: WNBA players want a raise, and Trump wants Redskins?
"Malicious prosecution," which covers the bringing of civil and administrative quasi-judicial complaints and not just criminal complaints, becomes especially relevant given a recent Colorado Supreme Court decision limiting defamation claims.
A lawyer tried to seal a copy of an earlier judge's order that had made certain claims about the lawyer.
Norma Nazario blames her son's death on social media algorithms.
Whatever the merits of this particular defamation claim, the president has a long history of abusing the legal system to punish constitutionally protected speech.
Recent protests at MLS matches and the ensuing bans for some fans have put the league in a delicate position, balancing tolerance and enforcement.
The speech included in-class display of "Free Palestine," e-mail signature saying "From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be free," and pro-Palestinian social media posts.
This was not an attack on the free press.
"Reading antidiscrimination laws to prohibit the voicing of views critical of a foreign state, or support thereof, would raise serious doubts about their constitutionality, which the Court must avoid."