If Brendan Carr Cares About Free Speech, He Should Make These Changes at the FCC
Now is the perfect time for the FCC to change its precedent to comply with the First Amendment.
Now is the perfect time for the FCC to change its precedent to comply with the First Amendment.
"You need to learn the rules," an officer says. "You run your mouth at me. Now you're on your face."
U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz highlights the chilling impact of Marco Rubio's dubious rationale for deporting students whose views offend him.
"Federal judges and their court staff are not legal pawns to be deployed in secret by wealthy disputants trying to get private answers to their problems."
One of the Orders calls on federal agencies to use the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition, which would label certain criticisms of Israel as anti-Semitic.
The Supreme Court ruled decades ago that burning the flag is protected by the First Amendment, no matter how offensive that act may be.
With the OneTaste case, the Department of Justice has embraced infantilizing ideas about women, consent, and coercion.
The Fox News personality reflects on her evolution from a contrarian Republican to a libertarian and her belief that personal freedom, humor, and not giving a shit are the keys to a better America.
A temporary order had been issued, but the trial court refused to extend it into a permanent order, and awarded $15K in attorney fees; an appellate court has just upheld the trial court's final decision, and added $8K for appellate attorney fees.
Even if the president was joking in both cases, he already has used his powers to punish people whose views offend him.
Plus: The glorious return of drive-in movie season.
Are outdated laws ripe for abuse? A listener asks whether it's time to sunset certain old laws.
The result is the same: attacks on tech companies and attempts to violate Americans' rights.
Karoline Leavitt's threat against ABC News is an attack on free speech.
An Eleventh Circuit panel (by a 2-1 vote) issues a stay of the preliminary injunction that the district court issued in Naples Pride's favor.
Sen. Blackburn introduced a bill this week that would make it a crime to publish the name of a federal law enforcement officer.
"Unsealing the May 6 Order is essential for the public to see the government's overreach in searching cellphones without probable cause and [is essential for] publishing precedent as courts unpack future such requests."
I haven't been closely following the many filings in the case, but I'm very glad the court is enforcing a fairly broad right of public access here.
So Texas's high court for criminal matters held yesterday.
The fight against anti-Semitism is undermined when it is conflated with mere criticism of Israel's government.
As the prosecution rests in the OneTaste case, the defense lays out the free speech implications if the government succeeds.
Signaling legislative contempt, one sponsor called the student groups "sex clubs." But in targeting the content of student speech the bill probably infringes First Amendment free speech rights and tramples the Equal Access Act of 1984
"Because Congress intended for the Civil Service Reform Act to strip district courts of jurisdiction only if federal employees were otherwise able to receive adequate and independent review of their claims, we vacate and remand to the district court to consider whether the text, structure, and purpose of the Civil Service Reform Act has been so undermined that the jurisdiction stripping scheme no longer controls"
Olympus Spa had sued on First Amendment grounds.
Two protesters in Wales were convicted for handing out pamphlets and filming an argument with their member of Parliament.
which is to say the court that is the most in favor of public access to court records in such cases.