"Plaintiff Argues That, If She Does Not Use Her Chosen Name, She Will Suffer Serious and Lasting Effects to Her Mental Health"
Not a basis for allowing what is in effect a form of pseudonymity, says a district court.
Not a basis for allowing what is in effect a form of pseudonymity, says a district court.
(among other things). A federal Magistrate Judge has recommended that the lawsuit be dismissed.
The Libertarian Party of Russia is pessimistic about the chances of overturning these restrictions through the courts or any other legal means.
A Magistrate Judge recommended today that the injunction be denied on First Amendment prior restraint grounds.
A tattoo business is challenging South Carolina laws restricting how and where tattoo artists operate.
And it can't ban a former state lawmaker from wearing a sweatshirt that advertises that website, either.
If someone is uncertain enough about meaning, they will censor themselves first.
“The First Amendment does not allow government officials to shut down speech simply on account of it being ‘offensive,’” says a legal expert at FIRE.
A new report from Meta's Oversight Board.
The court concluded that there wasn't enough evidence that the Post's statement (which the Post later retracted) was said with "actual malice," which is to say knowledge or recklessness about its falsehood.
can go forward, Georgia appellate court rules.
It's coming faster than you might think.
"[T]he Fifth Circuit ... discerned that pedanticism ought to be favored over practical wisdom."
"'Yeah, I had no idea it was false. Yeah, that's right. Yeah,' then demand summary judgment because no one possesses contrary evidence from inside his head. That may be the ticket for comedy. It is not the ticket for summary judgment."
The Texas Court of Appeals just upheld the order.
We've already received several submissions, but you can submit until August 16.
In the U.S., government officials aren’t allowed to fight ideas they don’t like with censorship.
"I want a smaller government. I want to get crooked judges and police officers out of the government," the rapper tells Reason's Andrew Heaton.
A court refuses to order defendant to stop such posting.
ICE is a menace to freedom of speech, as well as other civil liberties.
A new lawsuit accuses the Trump administration of violating the First Amendment rights of its critics by issuing warning notices to them.
As to James' discrimination claim, "James, who was on disciplinary probation leading up to the suspension, admits that Columbia suspended students involved in the encampment and fails to identify another student, who was also on disciplinary probation, whom Columbia declined to discipline."
High-level state officials launched a threat investigation over a harmless postcard to Florida's chief financial officer.
Plus: The Democrats' Project 2029 would ban minors from social media, the Supreme Court protects private data in geofence warrant ruling, and more...
The court concluded that the particular broadcast in this case didn't name or otherwise sufficiently identify the plaintiff (Dr. Mahendra Amin), and thus wasn't "of and concerning" him for libel law purposes.
Don't assume this couldn't happen in America too.
"Respondent was exercising her protected First Amendment right to free speech, and in so doing, did not undermine the trust of the students and families that they serve."
Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.