MENU

Reason.com

Free Minds & Free Markets

NAACP Backs Marijuana Federalism

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) recently endorsed a bill that would make the federal ban on marijuana inapplicable to people who grow, possess, or distribute cannabis in compliance with state law. H.R. 1523, the Respect State Marijuana Laws Act of 2013, would essentially repeal (or at least limit) federal pot prohibition in the 21 states that allow medical or recreational use of the drug. So far the bill, which was introduced by Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.), has 20 cosponsors, including five more Republicans: Justin Amash (Mich.), Dan Benishek (Mich.), Don Young (Alaska), Duncan Hunter (Calif.), and Steve Stockman (Texas). 

The NAACP resolution endorsing H.R. 1523, which was adopted by its board of directors at a meeting last month, notes that "even though numerous studies demonstrate that whites and African Americans use and sell marijuana at relatively the same rates, studies also demonstrate that African Americans are, on average, almost 4 times more likely to be arrested for marijuana possession, and in some jurisdictions Blacks are 30 times more likely to be arrested for marijuana possession than whites." The NAACP, which in recent years has highlighted the racially disproportionate impact of marijuana prohibition and condemned the war on drugs, last year supported the successful legalization initiatives in Colorado and Washington, so it's not surprising that the organization wants the feds to step back and let those experiments proceed. But Tom Angell, chairman of Marijuana Majority, argues that the NAACP's willingness to stand up for state's rights is significant given the group's history of battling segregationists who (erroneously) waved that banner:

For obvious historical reasons, many civil rights leaders who agree with us about the harms of marijuana prohibition still remain reluctant to see the states chart their own courses out of the failed "war on drugs." Having the NAACP's support for a states' rights approach to marijuana reform is going to have a huge impact and will provide comfort and cover to politicians and prominent people who want to see prohibition end but who are a little skittish about states getting too far ahead of the feds on this issue. 

As I've argued in Reason, there is nothing inherently right-wing about the Constitution's division of powers between the states and the federal government. Properly understood, federalism was never a license for violating rights protected by the 14th Amendment, and today it can profitably be employed by progressives to further their own causes. Ending the war on drugs should be at the top of the list. 

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Fist of Etiquette||

    Doesn't the NAACP realize it's effectively endorsing a return to slavery???

  • AlmightyJB||

    What do you mean return?

  • The Rt. Hon. Serious Man, Visc||

    So far the bill, which was introduced by Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.), has 20 cosponsors, including five more Republicans: Justin Amash (Mich.), Dan Benishek (Mich.), Don Young (Alaska), Duncan Hunter (Calif.), and Steve Stockman (Texas).

    These racist Tea-bagging Republicans only want black people out of prison so they can hunt them under the protection of Stand Your Ground laws.

  • derpules||

    That word "bagger" reminds me of another pejorative term that democrats used to use to describe a subset of the population that they didn't like. Surely, the "tolerance" of the progressive left knows no bounds.

  • Bo Cara Esq.||

    They want to federally legalize marijuana sales in states that opt to do so, but they oppose having to show an ID to buy.

  • Eduard van Haalen||

    winnah

  • Eduard van Haalen||

    "NAACP Supports SoCal Racist's Pro-Marijuana Bill

    "...Strange, then, to see the NAACP and O.C.'s Rohrabacher in bed together, since he's such a known racist, a man our friend at OC Weekly, Gustavo Arellano, has labeled a straight pendejo."

    http://blogs.laweekly.com/info....._naacp.php

  • R C Dean||

    Yer only about 30 years late to the party, NAACP. Better late than never, I guess.

  • Capt. Rimmer||

    Is this distinction even constitutional? So place of residence would be an element of a criminal offense?

  • SIV||

    Wish all you want but legalizing drugs is nowhere on the progressives' list, much less the top. Progressive dopers have redefined marijuana as something other than a drug. Read the comments and they finger "Big Pharma" as the enemy of legalization (not the government) and want to crack down even harder on the use of narcotic analgesics.

  • JidaKida||

    Thats what Im talking about dude.

    www.Privacy-Road.tk

  • jim123||

    the ban ban on marijuana must last all the time.

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online