Louisiana Cops Beat a Naked Inmate During a Strip Search. Long Withheld Video Shows He Was Compliant.
Although the officers were eventually criminally convicted, Jarius Brown is still pursuing damages to cover the medical expenses for serious injuries to his face, nose, and chest.
Footage from six years ago finally surfaced earlier this month, revealing the brutal beating of Jarius Brown by two Louisiana State Police (LSP) officers in 2019. Despite internal police records stating that "there was no way of defending" the assault, state police ultimately backed the deputies' claim that it was Brown, not the officers, who was the aggressor.
On September 27, 2019, Brown was arrested for possession of marijuana and taken to the DeSoto Parish Detention Center in Mansfield, Louisiana. While changing into prison clothing, surveillance footage shows two officers, Deputy Javarrea Pouncy and Deputy DeMarkes Grant, punching the naked 25-year-old repeatedly after Brown didn't squat as directed during a strip search. The officers landed 50 punches, which continued even after Brown fell to the ground.
After the attack, body camera video shows Brown—badly beaten and nearly unconscious—requesting to go to the hospital. According to the lawsuit he later filed, Brown "suffer[ed] from substantial injuries to his face, nose, and chest," and "struggled to remain conscious" during the visit. He also "experienced mental and emotional trauma from the beating."
"This went beyond excessive," Andrew Scott, a former police chief of Boca Raton, Florida, told the Associated Press after reviewing the footage. "This is something I would refer to as being brutalized." Scott also said that "there was no reason to throw the number of punches that they did," describing Brown as "absolutely compliant."
Following the incident, Grant was suspended and Pouncy was forced to resign, but local officials refused to release the video. Even if the video had been released, District Attorney Charles Adams told the A.P., the state police report would have made prosecution almost impossible. The report, according to the A.P., described Brown as the aggressor and determined that the officers took appropriate action. State investigators agreed that the footage supported the officers' claims and did not press charges against Grant or Pouncy.
Federal prosecutors, however, did choose to pursue charges against the deputies and accused both men of falsifying their reports. Pouncy pleaded guilty in 2023 for willfully using unreasonable force, failing to obtain medical care, and obstructing justice. He is currently serving a three-year sentence in federal prison. Grant later pleaded guilty in 2024 to obstruction charges for the filing of false reports and to willfully using unreasonable force against Brown, and was released in April after serving a 10-month sentence.
But despite these criminal convictions, holding these officers truly accountable remains elusive. Today, almost exactly six years after the attack, Brown is still pursuing damages in state court for his injuries and medical expenses. Brown also remains blocked from filing a federal lawsuit alleging that the officers used unconstitutional excessive force against him, unless and until the United States Supreme Court chooses to overturn Louisiana's statute of limitations on filing claims against state actors for violating civil rights.
It's taken years for Brown to hold the officers who brutalized him accountable because leaders at the state level have failed—or refused—to reform what the Justice Department found to be a "statewide pattern…of using excessive force, which violates the Fourth Amendment" across the LSP in January 2025. Federal oversight may have helped Brown, but it can't be relied upon to provide relief for the many other cases of police misconduct and abuse in Louisiana that aren't caught on camera.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Brown was arrested for possession of marijuana
Victimless crime. Glad the officers (finally) were prosecuted and did time.
What never makes sense to me is that they have to have a second trial to get any restitution. This dual-sovereignty nonsense makes a mockery of justice.
And it's very dangerous. What should have been a slam-dunk state conviction now relies on federalizing simple assault and battery.
Edit: When states can't clean up their mess and the local population becomes terrorized, it forces Reason to write a glowing article about how crime was finally cleaned up after Trump sent in the national guard.
It wasn't simple assault and battery. It was the state government abusing a citizen and violating the Constitution.
Trupm isn't and hasn't cleaned up crime. What's more: if he had been in office the DOJ wouldn't have charged them.
One is criminal the other is civil. One court for crime and punishment, another for money.
Duh. Capt Obvious can't answer the underlying question. I bet you didn't realize there is an underlying question.
You spent so much time trying to impress Jesse that you became his underling and don't even know it.
I get that, but it still feels like double jeopardy to me.
How is it double jeopardy if they never faced state charges?
It is very convenient for the police that they can avoid prosecution just by writing a false report that exonerates themselves.
Google "testilying".
And nothing else happened.
Shirley an honest department would investigate how that report was written saying the victim was the aggressor when the video evidence shows the opposite.
And then stonewall until the statute of limitations runs out.
AT should be along soon to demand this guy be put into prison for assaulting those officers' fists with his face.
No, he belonged in prison, for the rest of his life, for the reason he was arrested.
It's terrible he suffered abuse at the hands of police officers. Allow me to now renew my plea that we take a modern approach to the incarceration of suspects and inmates (both pre- and post-sentencing).
A criminal cannot be beaten by guards if he is in a cell from which he is not allowed to leave nor anyone else allowed to enter.
That is unusually reasonable. Are you drunk?
AT wants to put the guy in prison for life for marijuana. How is that reasonable?
Life in prison vs. death by stoning is almost reasonable by AT standards. For a self-proclaimed "libertarian" they're remarkably enthusiastic for authoritarian, paternalistic government. Lot of that going around here,
I didn't say "life in prison" either.
Good God, no wonder the Charlie Kirk's of the world threaten you so much. You don't even listen to them, you just respond in outrage to figments of your imagination that have nothing to do with them or anything they said.
So you said “ he belonged in prison, for the rest of his life”
Big difference
And for having some marijuana? You need to get help
Apologies, I meant "sentence."
Although.... on second thought, I guess if we're being honest I'm not really opposed to life sentences for drug crimes. At least in the short term, to put the fear of God into people that we're not screwing around with drug abuse anymore.
So, maybe it was an unintentional-intentional slip. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Anyway, yes, for having some marijuana. Why do I need "help" for taking that position? Recreational drug use, including marijuana, is a blight on society.
I get that you might like recreational drugs and think it totally harmless because heck you don't ever bother anyone when doing it, but it becomes quite problematic when you're multiplied by a few hundred thousand or even a few million.
And while your own prudence and self-restraint in inoffensively exercising liberty might be laudable, the fact of the matter is that all the druggies who aren't are ruining it FOR you. Either get a yoke on them, or they're going to drag you down WITH them when the rest of us say "Enough is enough already."
How is the social blight (in multiple facets, no less) directly caused by recreational drug use reasonable?
He should be sentenced to lifetime of torture for a total non-crime. Gotcha.
I never said a single word about torture. Nor could one even be remotely implied.
So , out of curiosity, what would have been the sentence if the prisoner had brutalized the officers ? Why isn't it the same ?
He would have been forced to watch reruns of Maddow.
8th amendment forbids cruel and unusual punishment.
But despite these criminal convictions, holding these officers truly accountable remains elusive.
One did time, the other's STILL doing time.
What more do you want? What would make them "truly accountable" in your ACAB anarchist dictionary?
Damages, schmuck
Are you suggesting that criminal punishment of the officers can't provide true accountability? If so, then what's the point of punishing them? What's the point of a criminal justice system at all if it doesn't provide any "true" accountability?
The guy who shot Charlie Kirk will spend the rest of his life in prison (if not worse, it's Utah after all). Are you saying that won't make him truly accountable? How many of his dollars will be necessary for that?
Compensation for his injuries, you freaking genius. If you or I beat up someone for no good reason we'd be on the hook, cops should be too
Damages are sought in civil court, which is what he's doing.
Though he should probably fire his attorneys for blowing a pretty important deadline (and/or possibly because they did a crap job at explaining what that deadline shouldn't matter). That seems to be the only reason it remains "pretty elusive." That's not the cop's fault, or the justice system's fault.
Also, see above. What would you say if his case was brought on the merits and a reasonable jury of his peers decided he was owed $30 in compensation. It'd be a win, but not much of a prize.
But the win is what matters right? Is that what provides "true accountability?"
Or are we advocating the New Progressive American Dream here? No longer should we work to earn our living, no no - the new American Dream is the seven-figure tort judgment. Rush now to become a victim and get your lottery ticket!
Also, why are you advocating for civil damages at all in a case like this? Those are just going to be pushed onto the taxpayer. Who didn't wrong him in any way shape or form.
Are you suggesting victims of government abuse shouldn't be compensated?
No, I'm arguing that a lack of victim compensation doesn't mean there was a failure with regard to "true accountability."
Some sort of consequences for whoever wrote the report saying the victim was the aggressor when the video shows otherwise would be nice
Pretty sure that was the dudes already in jail.
Without funding, The corrupt LPD would not exist. So, who funds it?
The taxpayers who comply with violent, deadly threats, e.g., laws, are supporting their own terrorists.
If victims are too cowardly to defend their rights, even non-violently, then they encourage the psychopaths and guarantee enslavement.