Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Regulation

Raw Milk Debates Are Turning Sour in Florida

Florida officials can’t agree on whether unpasteurized milk is a health threat or benefit, leaving consumers more confused than if they were left to decide for themselves.

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 8.30.2025 7:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
zumaglobalfifteen147127 | Olivia Sun/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom
(Olivia Sun/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom)

In the fall of 2024, I predicted that America might be on the brink of having its "raw milk moment" given now Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s political elevation. Since then, hardly a week has passed without unpasteurized milk making headlines across the country. A recent bacterial outbreak in Florida has now heightened the controversy and further solidified raw milk's central role in America's broiling culture wars.

The Florida Department of Health (DOH) issued a press release in early August detailing a campylobacter and E. coli outbreak in the Sunshine State. Officials alerted that "there have been 21 cases since January 24, 2025, including six children under the age of 10, and seven hospitalizations linked to consumption of raw milk." The DOH explicitly identified Keely Farms Dairy, a small family farm, as the source of the outbreak.

Weeks later, a Florida woman, represented by a self-described "national food poisoning law firm," filed suit against Keely Farms, alleging that its raw milk caused her two-year-old son to contract a bacterial infection and fall ill. The woman further alleges that she fell ill herself and developed sepsis, which eventually led to the loss of her pregnancy.

The details from the lawsuit are heartbreaking, but the more we learn about the situation surrounding Keely Farms, the more bizarre the story becomes. Despite DOH's definitive declaration that Keely Farms was the source of the bacterial outbreak, it was later found that the agency had reached this conclusion despite not conducting a single test at the farm, nor alerting the farm that it was under investigation. In a Facebook post, Keely Farms said that the department's press release "blindsided" them. (The DOH's press release stated that it would "continue working with Keely Farms Dairy," insinuating that the relevant parties had been working together throughout.)

Confusing things further, Keely Farms was recently inspected by the Florida Department of Agriculture. "We passed, as always," Keely Farms posted.

Selling raw milk for human consumption is illegal in Florida. As a result, milk that has not been pasteurized—the process of heating the liquid to a specific temperature for five to 30 seconds to kill harmful bacteria—can only be sold for livestock feed. Keely Farms' raw milk was appropriately labeled as "not for human consumption," meaning that the 21 Floridians who allegedly drank the farm's milk (and those who also gave it to their children) chose to do so despite this warning.

It's unclear how the current litigation involving Keely Farms will ultimately play out, although it's likely that more follow-on suits will be filed, using the DOH's press release as evidentiary fodder. 

Politico recently noted that raw milk has gone from "the darling of the organic liberals, deserving of sympathetic coverage…to the conservative culture war signal that is a sweetheart of deep-red state legislatures." This is on display in Florida. Despite the DOH targeting Keely Farms for its raw milk, Florida's Surgeon General Joseph A. Ladapo—an appointee of Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis and the head of the DOH—recently expressed support for human consumption of raw milk in a social media post. 

On the other hand, Florida's agriculture commissioner, who was endorsed by President Donald Trump, has encouraged Floridians to only drink pasteurized milk, citing the dangers of raw milk. This means that the head of the Florida agency that targeted Keely Farms' raw milk products is unexpectedly pro-raw milk, while the head of the state agency that inspected and greenlighted Keely Farms' operations is against raw milk.

This confusion highlights how raw milk has become a political flashpoint. The state health agency blamed Keely Farms while skipping basic investigative steps, the agriculture department cleared the farm, and their leaders publicly contradicted their own agencies.

When policy decisions are filtered through the lens of culture wars, the result is not clarity or safety but a muddle of mixed signals. Floridians are left unsure whether raw milk is a health risk, a personal freedom, or just another pawn in America's endless red vs. blue standoff.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Federal Appeals Court Says Trump's Tariffs Are Unlawful, Allows Them To Remain in Place

C. Jarrett Dieterle is a Legal Policy Fellow at the Manhattan Institute and the author of Give Me Liberty and Give Me a Drink!

RegulationRaw Milk BansFloridaMAHARobert Kennedy Jr.Public HealthDepartment of Health and Human ServicesState GovernmentsDairyFoodLawsuitsCourts
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (93)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. SQRLSY   18 hours ago

    Keely Farms' raw milk was appropriately labeled as "not for human consumption," meaning that the 21 Floridians who allegedly drank the farm's milk (and those who also gave it to their children) chose to do so despite this warning. ... Says the article.

    This should be bullet-proof insurance against Keely getting sued!!! Lawyers, go to Hell!!!

    If I bust my eardrum using a Q-Tip, that's on me, since I disobeyed the label! Labels cost money, ya know! And endless creativity in thinking of just exactly TWAT new stupid things consumers will do! Do I have to put a warning on a lawn mower, warning the mower-user to SNOT try to use it to give their kid a haircut?!?!?

    Log in to Reply
    1. JasonT20   10 hours ago

      Keely Farms' raw milk was appropriately labeled as "not for human consumption," meaning that the 21 Floridians who allegedly drank the farm's milk (and those who also gave it to their children) chose to do so despite this warning. ... Says the article.

      If a farm has bottles of milk labeled "not for human consumption", because regulations only allow them to be sold for use in feeding livestock, but then they sell it to people that they obviously know don't own any livestock, what then?

      Log in to Reply
      1. Chumby   9 hours ago

        Clearly a national registry of livestock owners is necessary. Before anyone purchases raw dairy products, they need to go through a background check overseen by the Raw Animal Product Enforcement to determine whether this can be allowed. I imagine many will get a “Do Not Proceed.” Plus there needs to be limits on high capacity raw milk containers as well as closing the 4H Club Show loophole.

        Log in to Reply
        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 hours ago

          You forget CO2 emissions restrictions for those livestock, and a carbon tax on milk.

          Log in to Reply
      2. Rossami   9 hours ago

        How do you "obviously know [I or anyone else] don't own any livestock"? Livestock (in most jurisdictions) includes pets. How do you know I'm not buying that unpasteurized milk to give to my cats? Or using it as a base for paint? Or any of the dozens of other uses for milk? You're inventing a liability standard that's both nonsensical and unenforceable.

        Easier, simpler and far more fair is to set the standard that 'doing something in violation of the seller's safety warnings is entirely your risk to take.

        Log in to Reply
        1. charliehall   3 hours ago

          "Livestock (in most jurisdictions) includes pets. "

          Where?

          Log in to Reply
        2. DesigNate   23 minutes ago

          “You're inventing a liability standard that's both nonsensical and unenforceable.”

          It’s kinda there whole thing.

          Log in to Reply
  2. Chumby   17 hours ago

    Teetering on absurd.

    Log in to Reply
    1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   16 hours ago

      Udderly ridiculous.

      Log in to Reply
      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   16 hours ago

        Don't have a cow, man.

        Log in to Reply
        1. Stupid Government Tricks   15 hours ago

          I think it's more like bull.

          Log in to Reply
          1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   14 hours ago

            I’ve really soured on this whole thing.

            Log in to Reply
            1. Stupid Government Tricks   13 hours ago

              Curdles brains, it does.

              Log in to Reply
              1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   11 hours ago

                Whey to go, man!

                Log in to Reply
    2. Wizzle Bizzle   14 hours ago

      A woman's baby is dead and Chumby is making jokes? How dairy!

      Log in to Reply
      1. Vernon Depner   11 hours ago

        We lack those sentimental feelings.

        Log in to Reply
      2. Chumby   11 hours ago

        I rarely read the articles. I don’t know them so it isn’t a case of not crying over killed ilk.

        Log in to Reply
        1. Stupid Government Tricks   9 hours ago

          Or kilt ilk, if yer Scottish.

          Log in to Reply
    3. Purple Martin   13 hours ago

      Wouldn't that be teatering? (my apologies to a grey box if it already said that).

      Log in to Reply
  3. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   16 hours ago

    Wait. A “food poisoning law firm” woman drank raw milk and gave it to her kid?
    And raw milk is illegal in Florida?

    Log in to Reply
    1. Wizzle Bizzle   15 hours ago

      Damn that DeSantis!

      Log in to Reply
      1. Mother's Lament   12 hours ago

        IT WAS TRUMP!!

        Log in to Reply
  4. TJJ2000   16 hours ago

    Did you ask the Gov-Gun-Gods if you could drink the milk from your cow?

    Log in to Reply
    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   16 hours ago

      Did you ask Greta (and PETA) if you can have a cow?

      Log in to Reply
      1. AT   14 hours ago

        Did AOC (may she rest in peace) sign off on their farts?

        Log in to Reply
  5. Earth-based Human Skeptic   16 hours ago

    And how many people who wring their hands over raw milk don't wash their hands after pooping?

    Log in to Reply
  6. MollyGodiva   15 hours ago

    It is almost like milk is pasteurized for a reason. Who could have predicted that power hungry government bureaucrats would accidentally do something the helps?

    I am a raw milk fan, I just don't lie to myself about what the risks are nor would I give it to young child.

    Log in to Reply
    1. TJJ2000   15 hours ago

      ...And *YOU* can pasteurize or buy pasteurized like a responsible adult instead of resorting to telling the rest of the world how to live at the end of a Gov 'Gun'.

      I swear people think Law is just a suggestion far too often.

      Log in to Reply
      1. Stupid Government Tricks   14 hours ago

        And then get pissed off when (a) the bad people don't obey them and don't get caught, (b) the good people get caught when cops and prosecutors take them seriously.

        Log in to Reply
        1. MollyGodiva   10 hours ago

          The woman’s kid almost died and her fetus did. Many of these laws are to try to prevent idiot parents from killing their own kids.

          Log in to Reply
          1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   9 hours ago

            The idiot was a “food poisoning law firm”.

            Log in to Reply
          2. Stupid Government Tricks   9 hours ago

            If safety were the only concern, no one would ever do anything, including procreate.

            If it saves one child but forces 300 million to suffer, is that the right balance?

            Log in to Reply
            1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 hours ago

              Hey, man, taking freedom from 300 million people is not suffering. Consider it forced enlightenment. (The religious kind, not the Lockean kind.)

              Log in to Reply
          3. DesigNate   21 minutes ago

            You don’t care about women killing their fetuses….

            Log in to Reply
    2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   15 hours ago

      I just don't lie to myself about what the risks are, I just get used to it.

      Log in to Reply
    3. Mother's Lament   12 hours ago

      "I am a raw milk fan"

      That's not the only raw thing Tony's a fan of.

      Log in to Reply
      1. Chumby   10 hours ago

        Does he like Piña Colada?

        Log in to Reply
        1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   9 hours ago

          Getting caught in the rain?

          Log in to Reply
    4. Chumby   11 hours ago

      You like it directly from the bull.

      You should never be around any young child.

      Log in to Reply
  7. Restoring the Dream   15 hours ago

    Pasteurization was started for a very specific reason: to kill tuberculosis bacilli. It may not be completely effective for other microorganisms. Before it was all but eliminated, tuberculosis in cows was aggressively dealt with. Cows were inspected and those suspected of TB contamination were destroyed on the spot. My grandmother told me stories of the early 1900's.

    Log in to Reply
    1. TJJ2000   14 hours ago

      You mean people dealt with it w/o 'Guns' before pasteurization?
      How can that be? Only 'Guns' (Gov-Guns) can ensure health I'm told.

      Log in to Reply
      1. JeremyR   8 hours ago

        It killed 1000s of people a year before pasteurization.

        Log in to Reply
        1. Chumby   8 hours ago

          My recollection from the Salvato health engineering reference is that during the industrial revolution with its urbanization, distilleries used the spent mash to feed cows which produced milk for sale. This “swill milk” was made from cows not fed a natural diet coupled with CAFO-esque conditions where poor cow health resulted in poor milk quality. Other ingredients were reportedly added as bulking/masking agents.

          Think Reason did an article (book review?) about this a year or two ago.

          Log in to Reply
          1. charliehall   4 hours ago

            I grew up around dairy farms. Centuries after the industrial revolution happened. The cows ate grass except then it was too cold for them to go outdoors or there was snow on the ground. In those days they ate corn grown by the same farmers.

            Milk and fruit juice are impossible to store safely. Louis Pasteur made it possible to drink them safely.

            Log in to Reply
            1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 hours ago

              "I grew up around dairy farms."

              How much work is "around" doing here?

              Log in to Reply
            2. Chumby   2 hours ago

              Cows in their natural environment eat hay. When dairy cows in this area are supplemented with corn (and other fodder), they eat the entire plant known as silage.

              You are free to avoid drinking raw milk. You are feee to get another booster.

              Log in to Reply
        2. TJJ2000   7 hours ago

          The Gov - 'Guns' didn't save them! /s

          No matter how you want to swing it.
          The 'Guns' are not needed for ?health?.
          Wrong tool for the job.

          Log in to Reply
        3. charliehall   4 hours ago

          Correct. But pro lifers only care about pre born life.

          Log in to Reply
          1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 hours ago

            What a weird thing to say.

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIkvQHk_sWM

            Log in to Reply
          2. Chumby   1 hour ago

            Nobody here that opposes killing the unborn has supported the tranny groomer school shooter murderers.

            Log in to Reply
            1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 hour ago

              chuck skews the polls that show leftists have no idea what non-leftists think.

              Log in to Reply
    2. charliehall   3 hours ago

      Pasteur died in 1895.

      Log in to Reply
      1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 hours ago

        Today is 8/31/2025.

        Log in to Reply
    3. ravenshrike   2 hours ago

      Pasteurization was started because without significant refrigeration, especially during transport, raw milk would be held at temperatures above 40F for days at a time before being consumed. Assuming arguendo that the tests at Keely Farms were properly performed, then I would look into the transport company they used and the sales locations as to improper handling of the product.

      Log in to Reply
  8. AT   14 hours ago

    As always, there is room for compromise here.

    People who want to drink normal pasteurized milk can continue to get it from the store. The stores will not stock raw milk anywhere near it, so as to avoid confusion. Those who want raw milk will be free to obtain it, but must consume it straight from the cow's udder. Udder-to-mouth is the only way to avoid any potential contaminants, other than those naturally found in the raw milk.

    There, everybody wins.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Wizzle Bizzle   14 hours ago

      I also favor a sort of compromise. We make raw milk widely available, totally untested. We then package it with a giant skull and crossbones on the label and make the producers immune to lawsuits, RNA vaccine style. We then allow all of the hippies, RFKers, MAHAs, bio-hackers, commune cults, and every other smelly, unwashed freak at the farmer's market to drink up. What follows can only be good for society.

      Log in to Reply
      1. Eeyore   14 hours ago

        What about forcing people to drink it in order to keep their jobs? I think you should have to chug a pint in order to enter a Walmart.

        Log in to Reply
        1. AT   12 hours ago

          At which point they'll be offered some complementary frozen shrimp.

          Log in to Reply
    2. Eeyore   14 hours ago

      One cow is potentially multiuser as well. If you can avoid having the cow try and step on you.

      Log in to Reply
    3. Stupid Government Tricks   12 hours ago

      Aren't you the cute little statist dictating what other people must do.

      Log in to Reply
      1. AT   9 hours ago

        You're only upset because everyone you know irl gets their milk straight from your mom.

        Log in to Reply
    4. Chumby   10 hours ago

      https://tenor.com/view/milking-the-bull-gif-6220916808569021369

      Log in to Reply
  9. Gaear Grimsrud   12 hours ago

    I was under the impression that a paper mask was sufficient to ward off deadly disease. But we allow dairy cows to wander around maskless and ignoring social distancing. It wasn't long ago that these magical devices littered the parking lots of America's Walmarts and could have easily been repurposed for use by our bovine friends. But now we face yet another threat to human survival. Just a tragic waste.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Chumby   11 hours ago

      Not enough herd mentality?

      Log in to Reply
      1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   9 hours ago

        You got a beef with that?

        Log in to Reply
  10. JasonT20   10 hours ago

    Florida officials can’t agree on whether unpasteurized milk is a health threat or benefit, leaving consumers more confused than if they were left to decide for themselves.

    Genuine question here. How I am I supposed to decide for myself whether drinking raw milk is safe?

    Log in to Reply
    1. Chumby   9 hours ago

      You should have the Democratic Party tell you what you should and should not be doing and report anyone you observe that is not following their narrative.

      Log in to Reply
    2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   9 hours ago

      How do you make other decisions?

      Log in to Reply
      1. Chumby   8 hours ago

        I’d guess a healthy serving of Rachel Maddow viewing could be involved.

        Log in to Reply
        1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   8 hours ago

          Poor misguided bastard.

          Log in to Reply
      2. DesigNate   17 minutes ago

        Jump to conclusions mat?

        Log in to Reply
    3. Longtobefree   6 hours ago

      Genuine answer: If you have to ask us, you are not deciding for yourself.
      Just a wild and crazy idea; search the internet, then consult the library.

      End of genuineness:
      Then flip a coin

      Log in to Reply
      1. JasonT20   5 hours ago

        Just a wild and crazy idea; search the internet, then consult the library.

        And where does the information I would find on the internet or in the library come from?

        How is it "deciding for myself" if I am just going to do what some website or book tells me to do?

        Log in to Reply
        1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 hours ago

          You could disguise yourself as a child and let Lying Jeffy tie you up in his mom's basement and then you two could debate this question for hours on end.

          Log in to Reply
    4. Rick James   5 hours ago

      Genuine question here. How I am I supposed to decide for myself whether drinking raw milk is safe?

      Same way you'll figure out if your off-the-shelf fentanyl is safe when all drugs are legalized and we've *checked Reason archives* abolished every federal regulatory agency.

      Log in to Reply
      1. JasonT20   5 hours ago

        Same way you'll figure out if your off-the-shelf fentanyl is safe when all drugs are legalized and we've *checked Reason archives* abolished every federal regulatory agency.

        Maybe the invisible hand of the free market will tell me.

        Log in to Reply
  11. JeremyR   8 hours ago

    If anything, the state should prosecute the mother who drank the milk that killed her baby.

    It's one thing to harm your own health by doing stupid things like drink raw milk. But when you harm someone else, that's wrong.

    I know, I know, Reason thinks unborn babies are just parasites that somehow got in the body without the woman doing anything and so don't count.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Chumby   8 hours ago

      Perhaps not too dissimilar to the chickenpox lollipop thing, the deathcult could ship contaminated milk to those wanting to kill their unborn babies.

      Log in to Reply
    2. charliehall   4 hours ago

      She would call the idiot governor and the quack surgeon general in her defense and the jury would return a not guilty verdict in five minutes.

      Log in to Reply
  12. Rick James   8 hours ago

    What crime? DC Mayor reports carjackings down by 87%

    Log in to Reply
    1. Vernon Depner   6 hours ago

      So, that must mean the the crime numbers are going NEGATIVE, and the thugs are giving away cars in the streets.

      Log in to Reply
  13. Roberta   7 hours ago

    ...

    When policy decisions are filtered

    What policy decisions? I noticed nothing here about them, just opinion quotes from officials, or opinions attributed to them. Did the legalities of raw milk sales change?

    Log in to Reply
  14. KARl hungus   6 hours ago

    Is there Chocolate or Strawberry raw milk?

    Log in to Reply
    1. creech   4 hours ago

      Surely you've seen brown and reddish coated cows?

      Log in to Reply
  15. Longtobefree   6 hours ago

    " . . . the agency had reached this conclusion despite not conducting a single test at the farm, nor alerting the farm that it was under investigation."

    Even Florida has democrats.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Vernon Depner   6 hours ago

      FYTW shall be the whole of the law.

      Log in to Reply
    2. KARl hungus   6 hours ago

      The Florida Department of Health is headed by the Surgeon General Joe Ladapo. That guy is definitely not a democrat.

      Florida hasn’t had a Democrat governor since 1999. Most the decision makers in the Department of Health are most likely Republican.

      Log in to Reply
  16. James Basil   4 hours ago

    I don't believe that these individuals got sick from drinking raw milk and you wanna know why. Cause if John Oliver CNN Msnbc are reporting against raw milk chances are its all merde. We have a right as citizens do drink raw milk or not its that simple. Regulations have not protect people more.

    Log in to Reply
  17. charliehall   4 hours ago

    "Floridians are left unsure whether raw milk is a health risk,"

    It is a health risk. Period.

    So is unpasteurized fruit juice.

    That is why prior to Pasteur, the only beverages safe to drink were either hot (coffee and tea) or alcoholic.

    Log in to Reply
    1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 hours ago

      I like how you used a period sign, ".", but then also said "Period", with a capital P, then also placed a period after "Period".

      Then threw it to fruit juice. Instead of the other juice.

      Log in to Reply
  18. Chumby   2 hours ago

    Four years ago today (30 August), president Joe “Child Groper” Biden (D) oversaw the abandonment of the twenty year campaign that he originally voted for when senator, helped oversee for eight years as assistant manager to president Obama, and then extended unilaterally after helping to commit the US to about a trillion dollars in spending and leaving behind billions in materiel. His efforts results in replacing the Taliban with, you guessed it, the Taliban. Many unnecessary lives were lost during that military adventuring.

    Log in to Reply
    1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   1 hour ago

      Was giving up Bagram a mistake?

      Log in to Reply
      1. Chumby   34 minutes ago

        Secretly abandoning Bagram in the middle of the night without even telling the allies was certainly a mistake as well just leaving the prisoners there to be sprung forth by others. Two airstrips. Easier to defend. While some will say that staying in Kabul provided the optics that “normal” would remain, from the Chinese govt negotiating with the Taliban to even the WH press corps asking the tough questions regarding “what is next” where Biden (D) went all in on the puppet govt not falling was enough for a non Democratic Party shill to understand this would look like Vietnam and it did.

        Log in to Reply

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Raw Milk Debates Are Turning Sour in Florida

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 8.30.2025 7:00 AM

Federal Appeals Court Says Trump's Tariffs Are Unlawful, Allows Them To Remain in Place

Eric Boehm | 8.29.2025 7:10 PM

Trump's Tariffs and Immigration Policies Are Why Your Amazon Packages Are So Expensive and Will Take Forever

Jack Nicastro | 8.29.2025 6:20 PM

Neither Cranks Nor Hacks Should Head HHS

Matt Welch | 8.29.2025 3:16 PM

Trump's $4.9 Billion 'Pocket Rescission' Violates Federal Law and Usurps Congressional Authority

Eric Boehm | 8.29.2025 1:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300