This U.S. Citizen Recorded an Immigration Arrest. Officers Told Him To Delete It or Face Charges.
The peaceful traffic stop in Florida turned violent after immigration officers arrived and used chokeholds and a stun gun to make arrests.

Immigration officers were caught on video celebrating proudly after using chokeholds and a stun gun to arrest two undocumented immigrants in Florida. The owner of the video, an 18-year-old American citizen, was threatened and charged after he refused to delete the footage revealing the harsh tactics used by immigration authorities to meet the Trump administration's mass deportation goals.
Kenny Laynez-Ambrosio was on his way to work on the morning of May 2 with his mother and two other men in North Palm Beach, Florida, when the vehicle was pulled over by a Florida Highway Patrol (FHP) officer, reported The Guardian. The initial reason for the stop is unclear, but after the FHP called in Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers, the peaceful traffic stop quickly turned violent.
Laynez-Ambrosio began recording when CBP agents arrived, and a female officer can be heard asking if anyone in the car is an undocumented immigrant. One of Laynez-Ambrosio's friends answered that he was. "That's when they said, 'OK, let's go,'" Laynez-Ambrosio told The Guardian. Before anyone was able to exit the vehicle, CBP officers became aggressive. "[One officer] put his hand inside the window," he said, "popped the door open, grabbed my friend by the neck and had him in a chokehold."
In the video, he can be heard telling the officers, "You can't grab me like that," while three officers pull the second man from the van, and tell him to "get your fucking head down, on the ground." When the man lands on his feet while being pulled from the vehicle, officers push him to the ground and then pull him back to his feet while one officer keeps him in a headlock. Laynez-Ambrosio, who was also forced to the ground, can be heard yelling, "That's not how you arrest people. If y'all going to arrest people, y'all have to arrest people regular." He then tells his friend, in Spanish, "Don't resist. Don't resist." The commotion ends when an officer uses his stun gun on Laynez-Ambrosio's friend, who falls to the ground, crying out in pain.
"You're scaring the dude," Laynez-Ambrosio says to an officer shortly after. "That's not how you arrest people." "Why?" an officer callously responds. After asserting his "rights to talk," an officer tells Laynez-Ambrosio, "You've got no rights here. You're a migo, brother."
The recording continues after the three men are in custody and captures the officers' candid remarks. A couple of officers can be heard cracking jokes about how one man smells and bragging about the stun gun use. One officer remarks on how "they're starting to resist more now." Another responds, "We're going to end up shooting some of them… because they're going to start fighting."
"Just remember, you can smell that [inaudible] with a $30,000 bonus," one officer says amidst post-arrest celebrations.
After his arrest and six-hour detention at a CBP station, Laynez-Ambrosio told The Guardian he was threatened with charges if he didn't delete the exposing video. When he refused, he was charged with obstruction without violence for having allegedly interfered with CBP officers' arrest—a first-degree misdemeanor punishable by up to a $1,000 fine and one year of incarceration. He was ultimately sentenced to 10 hours of community service and a four-hour anger management course. The two undocumented men were transferred to the Krome detention center in Miami. Laynez-Ambrosio "believes they were released on bail and are awaiting a court hearing, but said it has been difficult to stay in touch with them."
Florida has led the nation in cooperation with federal immigration authorities, sparking privacy and civil liberty concerns for both undocumented immigrants and American citizens alike. But rather than change course, the Trump administration has doubled down on mass deportation goals and recently appropriated nearly $75 billion to dramatically increase immigration detention capacity and immigration arrests to reach 3,000 arrests per day. The appropriation includes funding for hiring, retention, and performance bonuses for federal immigration officers.
"The federal government has imposed quotas for the arrest of immigrants," Laynez-Ambrosio's attorney, Jack Scarola, told The Guardian. "Any time law enforcement is compelled to work towards a quota, it poses a significant risk to other rights."
Scarola's warning appears to be right. The Department of Homeland Security posted on Monday that it will "stop at nothing to hunt [undocumented immigrants] down." The brutal tactics used by federal officers under the Trump administration, against mostly nonviolent immigrants—including people on their way to work and who pose no threat to public safety—will only serve to degrade constitutional protections and subject more people to the government's abuse of power.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"You've got no rights here. You're a migo, brother."
The dehumanizing is official.
"We're going to end up shooting some of them… because they're going to start fighting."
That's always the next step after dehumanizing.
QUALIFIED IMMUNITY
I want to know more about the $30k bounty.
Me, too!
Also, shoot them in the face!
Creative editing to push propaganda. And you fell on your knees to slurp it up.
Have you applied to ICE yet? You could achieve your dream of murdering some illegals if you get hired.
You’d lap up piss if you thought supported your narrative, Sarc.
The maga accusation is a confession.
InsaneTrollLogic could teach a class: "How to suck cop cock 101"
I do not believe a single word in this article..
You've cried "wolf" a few too many times.
You are saying her article is possibly accurate?
Ditto. Then I saw this ...
He can say all that while in a chokehold? Note: Autumn Billings has such a terrible track record for errors of both commission and omission that I am not going to waste time trying to check the video.
AB;dr
mostly nonviolent immigrants
Billings lacks even creativity in her narrative clinging.
The friend in the chokehold didn't say it. Linked video isn't quite clear, though - your 2nd quote containing "me", may have been missused by the guy and should have sayed "we" when they were being pulled out.
Eitherway linked video is edited by the Guardian. Autumn should learn from Soave's review of Covington kids to use the full unedited video before commenting.
That's why there is video, for people who don't want to believe a story. Now if you don't believe the video, either ... well, I don't know what can be done for you.
They choose not to believe.
You choose not to see what is clearly visible, even in the edited video.
I’m old enough to remember how the media straight lied about Zimmerman’s phone call and the Covington kid, so spare us.
Hey douchebag, watch the video yourself. The guy who admits he is here illegally resists the entire time right up until they taser him to the ground.
Edited video. The press has earned credibility, for sure.
And the reported statements in the video from the parties did not seem to fully jibe WITH the video.
But details...
Nothing in that video seemed out of line. Illegals refused to cooperate, so they were forced to the ground. Good policing.
No. You believe it but you rather it not be reported because you approve.
I approve arresting illegals and not being super friendly when they resist. And the entire story from Autumn, as usual, is bullshit on stilts.
What a surprise you will not believe anything that doesn't fit your agenda.
If the illegal aliens self deport, we can avoid potential problems during their apprehension.
Correct.
If the government were to legalize the status of peaceful illegal aliens, the same goal can be achieved, since there wouldn't be mass apprehensions.
No forgiveness for lawlessness.
They have.
Their legal status is that they are here illegally.
But, sure, if we legalize murder, murder rates will go down thru the floor.
When did you become an anarchist?
Because hopping the fence and getting a job is the same as murder.
When did you get a lobotomy?
It's the same as trespassing and theft. Trespassing and theft are both NAP violations.
Remember --- sarc (checked whose user name you replied to) believes murder is a suitable punishment for trespass.
Do you hold a rosary when you pray to Saint Babbitt?
Do you hold ass beads when you kneel down to pray to Saint Barack?
The MAGA cannot come up with its own insult. Has to steal others. #lowiq
This you buddy?
I back the blue when they’re right. In this case, as you very well know, the cop didn’t know she was unarmed and from his vantage point he couldn’t see the crowd. He just saw someone crawling through a smashed barricade while hearing chaos on the police radio. So based upon what he knew based upon what he could see and hear, he did what he thought was right.
Just another video he didn't actually watch. I posted it for him multiple times, but he keeps on mouthing the narrative.
Right. Except that their landlord, their employer and the places where they shop all disagree. Trespassing is an individual thing. Unless you're a collectivist. Are you a collectivist? Yes, we've been over this already. You indeed are a collectivist.
And how would you feel if someone trespassed on your cardboard box under I-95? Shoot them in the face at close range?
Except that their landlord, their employer and the places where they shop all disagree.
They are deceiving all those people. Why don't you have a problem with that?
They trespassed when they took their first step in the USA.
To the extent that they are trespassing on public lands, it's not a violation of NAP. What are you alleging they have stolen?
If giant meteor strikes the planet, same goal can be achieved. Until then, self-deport or be apprehended to facilitate that.
Why on earth would we want to legalize the status of millions of illegal aliens?
Apportionment to put more HoR and electoral college votes in certain places as well as more access to underage boys.
That is what tRump wants to do with farm and hospitality workers
Man so witty and edgy.
The goal is removal of illegal aliens, and reduction of illegal entries. There is no such thing as a "peaceful illegal alien". Invading our country illegally is not peaceful.
I’ve seen this movie before!
If the Kleptocracy hadn't turned the planet prohibitionist at gunpoint to suck up to Qing China, South Americans could by now have freedom of production and trade. Just think, they could send agents with carpetbags of gold-backed currency Stateside to "advise" Congress on the dangers of Christian National Socialism and Harry Anslinger's FATF buddies wrecking stock markets.
If the jews leave of their own free will then we don't have to gas them, right? Is that how that works?
Yes, that's right. Deporting illegal aliens is exactly the same as gassing Jews. Sending people back to their own countries is a holocaust. We have no right to enforce our visa and immigration laws like every other country in the world.
You gotta be fucking kidding me. Billings completely shirks her responsibility as a journalist to be skeptical of an obviously narrated and edited video.
You're a migo, brother.
The cop clearly says, "You're illegal, brother." The guy even responds, "I was born and raised right here." Then the female cop clearly says "ok, alright" and the video gets cut off right there.
What a hack job.
Tune dem beaners up!
Again?
"The Narrative", the whole narrative, and nothing but the narrative.
No wonder there are as many new names on the articles as in the comments.
>>Before anyone was able to exit the vehicle
before anyone was able to go for a weapon?
We shouldn't really be calling it a video since most of the run time is the Laynez-Ambrosio deliberately obstructing the lens or filming the sky/ground. It's functionally an audio recording that only has video for the part where officers have to use force to arrest two uncooperative men.
And what we see of that is utterly banal. The suspects are uncooperative but not violent, so the officers physically restrain them and force them into a position where they can be properly cuffed. You might not like to watch it happen, but when someone is being arrested their hands need to go behind their back to be handcuffed. And if they refuse to do so voluntarily, officers are going to have to physically reposition the arrestee's arms against their will.
In other nitpicks, there is actually no evidence whatsoever of a Taser deployment and that is clearly a headlock not a chokehold. They are different things, stop conflating them. Also the reason for the stop might have something to do with them having four people sitting in the front seat of the vehicle.
Two things:
1 - the guy put his phone down and it was aimed up, So what. I don't think that was deliberate since he might have had it taken away if the agents saw it.
2 - The guy who was squawking had clearly been tased as he started groaning
But, the arrest was not unusual in any manner. Proper policing.
The worst part here - the article admits all this. But still says the arrest turned violent 'when the officers showed up'?
Police violence would end if they would just stop enforcing laws. Then they could focus their violence on their wives and children.
Thass riiiiite. Them poor SS officers were minding their own bidness when these anti-social spics came up and FORCED the poor Aryans to arrest them--even FORCED the poor misunderstood baybees to physically reposition the armed arrestees bones! How exhausting! Surely the cop unions can do SOMEthing besides send whitecapped shills to sniff at Reason.
Against my better judgement I read this and watched the video. This vehicle is not a van taking 4 people to work. This is a semi truck pulling a van or possibly reefer trailer. It's very unusual for a semi truck to have 3 passengers in the sleeper. Beyond the driver additional passengers require additional insurance coverage. Not illegal but would definitely raise the eyebrows of any state cop who pull over big rigs all day. And a little odd that a landscaping business would need a van trailer. Maybe a flatbed but a full size rig seems pretty strange, another red flag. Really impossible to tell whether the cops over reacted but the whole situation looks pretty sketchy to me. Bottom line, the cops had good reason to suspect that there were illegals present and this article doesn't convince me otherwise.
So no evidence to support he was told to delete the video, but you're going to run with it anyway? Where is your Reason in this article, it is full of emotion.
They're 'journalists', so give them a bit of artistic (activist) license, OK?
I really don't care, Margaret
You seemed to have skipped over an important step. You say he was arrested and charged with obstruction. Then, in the next sentence, you say he was ultimately sentenced to 10 hours of community service.
So what happened in between? Did he plead guilty or did he plead innocent and was convicted? I'm guessing the former. If he pled guilty to obstruction, then he doesn't really have any standing, nor do you, to claim he was innocent of the charges. I understand that a lot of people plead guilty to charges they are innocent of, but it still counts, and if you want me to believe you were innocent, you will have to provide some compelling evidence, much more than just your say-so.
Fake faceless sockpuppets DEMAND proof!
"Just remember, you can smell that [inaudible] with a $30,000 bonus," one officer says amidst post-arrest celebrations.
Oh good, they at least partially implemented my idea! I'm so happy for that!
Who ELSE takes advice from Altruist Totalitarian sockpuppets?
Hi squirrel.
"...two undocumented immigrants..."
Should read, "...two illegal aliens..."
Belgian train steward detected...