Lab-Grown Salmon Gets FDA Approval
States keep banning lab-grown meat. Entrepreneurs keep innovating anyway.

While a handful of states have banned the sale or production of lab-grown meat within their borders, the infant industry is still innovating. Cultivated salmon company Wildtype received approval from the Food and Drug Administration in late May, and the company announced it would soon be served at a restaurant in Portland, Oregon, with additional restaurants set to serve the fish in the coming months.
"We're proud to share that we completed a thorough pre-market safety consultation with FDA," the company said in a press release this month. "Transparency is important to us at Wildtype."
Wildtype is the third lab-grown meat producer to receive full government approval. Two other companies focused on lab-grown chicken gained approval in 2023. Cultivated chicken enjoyed a brief restaurant-based debut that year before falling out of the commercial market. With Wildtype's launch, it will be the only lab-cultivated meat product available for commercial sale in the United States.
"Based on the information Wildtype has presented to FDA, as well as other information available to the agency, we did not identify a basis for concluding that the production process…would be expected to result in food that bears or contains any substance or microorganism that would adulterate the food," reads the FDA's letter to Wildtype. "However, as you are aware, it is Wildtype's continuing responsibility to ensure that foods it markets are safe, wholesome, and in compliance with all applicable legal and regulatory requirements."
While the cultivated-meat industry is obviously infinitesimal compared to traditional animal agriculture, that hasn't stopped several states from banning lab-grown meat, often justifying their actions with overtures to protecting meat producers from competition.
"We must protect our incredible farmers and the integrity of American agriculture," Florida Commissioner of Agriculture Wilton Simpson said in a press release after Florida banned lab-cultivated meat last year. "Lab-grown meat is a disgraceful attempt to undermine our proud traditions and prosperity, and is in direct opposition to authentic agriculture."
Could Wildtype's Salmon ever compete with the real thing? Well, I tried Wildtype at a tasting last year. While the cultivated Salmon won't fool any devoted seafood lovers, it has a pleasantly fishy, savory flavor profile—though like other lab-grown meat products, it struggles on the texture front. For dedicated vegetarians, or just anyone looking to try salmon without the risk of heavy metal or parasite exposure common in slaughtered fish, Wildtype could be an attractive alternative. But when states intervene to protect special interests, they keep consumers from deciding for themselves.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
More testing needed!
heavy metal or parasite exposure common in slaughtered fish
If it was common, nobody would be eating it.
In People's Democratic Republic of Portland, private company makes money by exposing lab-grown fish to parasites!
It gives that authentic taste!
"by exposing parasites to lab-grown fish!"
I guess I may've stumbled like an amateur on the Yakov Schmirnov, double-reverse-entendre with a twist.
dafuq would you eat lab material when food is plenty?
Why would you discuss eating fake "salmon" (I will not call it "lab-grown") while real salmon species are beginning to run for the PNW rivers? Chinook, Coho, Pinks (this year), Sockeye, Chum, and Steelhead are all running, or about to, later this summer.
Must be a terrible drought if the salmon are running!
Lab grown tuna would be a boon - no risk of mercury, nor overfishing. Tuna has a phenomenal protein/calorie ratio. Salmon's is pretty good but not comparable.
FWIW if you make salmon jerky, as I do, the original texture doesn't matter.
but it's ... not tuna ... jerky was at least once fish and yes is tasty
Well, if it has the same cellular composition and at least similar flavour, and makes good jerky, I won't care.
fair enough I like the fishing for the fish.
Dependance on others is the biggest negative. I can catch both tuna (albacore) and salmon in reasonable driving distance.
I can preserve (canning, smoke, cure, freeze) both fish species. That lab shit is just another product that eliminates self-reliance.
The Turing Test for food. If you can't tell the difference, there is no difference to get het up about.
Litmus test for adulthood. If someone or something else has to invent an egg substitute for you so that you don't have to suffer the anguish of "sacrificing" actual eggs to make an actual omelette, whatever is producing the egg substitute is the genuine, functional entity and you're just the artificial imitation of it.
I'd feel compelled to say that the ability to break eggs to make an omelette doesn't mean you should go around forcibly breaking all the eggs to make all the omelettes, but you're the egg-substitute teat-sucker, I don't have to worry about you breaking eggs in the first place.
There are vitamin and protein shoppes all over the place in virtually every mid-sized or larger town I drive through. There are also jerky stores with jerked meat of virtually every animal and combination thereof imaginable in these same places. There are companies without federal subsidies pressing pea and whey proteins into "protein chips" profitably. These tards don't want that.
The stupid n+1 wave Gaiaists don't want that and can't help but directly contradict the organic, whole food, and anti-industrial axioms of their nth-wave Gaiaist predecessors.
It's the same "We need to do X to save the planet and all of humanity. Unless deplorables think we ought to do X. Then we should find another way to do it or not do it at all." stupidity of broken theater kids.
Not approved on my plate.
Next up. West coast states mandate that all students inject lab grown salmon in order to attend public school. Science.
Wildtype
Even the name has that perfectly shitty-fraudulent "First Ascent" (on Friday, in the elevator, to the 15th floor, where my office is) brand identity.
I guess after all those years of trying to slander "beef trimmings" and "textured meat byproduct" as "pink slime" they realized they should go a different direction with their own product.
Beff and Loobster
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyleI2p-JMY
"Entrepreneurs keep innovating anyway"
The question of course is, why bother. I don't see any good reason to ban this stuff but I have to wonder about the idiots throwing away cash trying to sell it. Let's see. Costs more than real salmon but doesn't taste as good. Brilliant marketing scheme.
Is there anything vegan that's cheaper and tastes better than the real thing?
Not that I'm aware of. But does this stuff qualify as Vegan?
Vegan - "The core principle is to avoid any exploitation or cruelty to animals as much as possible."
Sounds like it might qualify.
Crayons? Paste?
100%
I have nothing against exploring this path, but you are correct it can't just exist. It has to come in cheaper and either taste better, or solve a problem like storage, transport, spoilage, qty, etc.
It feels like a project started back when Scientism was concerned with overpopulation.
There is an upper limit as to how much salmon can be caught from salmon runs, for obvious reasons.
Salmon farming seems to work pretty well.
We haven’t reached it in hundreds of years.
Haven't we? Humans do have a pretty significant effect on fisheries.
I'm pretty sure it wouldn't be too hard to catch an entire river's salmon run with modern tech and equipment.
It feels like a project started back when Scientism was concerned with overpopulation.
Or just plain-old antagonizing anyone and everyone for self-aggrandizing/gratification.
Seems like the whole "I'm more morally correct because I don't kill animals." predates (or leapfrogs) Scientistic overpopulation cons.
Let the market decide.
Yes! Cronies ban substitutes on the grounds that allowing substitutes is the slippery slope to mandating substitutes.
Why not just ban the mandate? Because they're virtue signalling, because their cronies are afraid the substitutes might some day be better in some way.
So much simpler to just plain butt out, but that's not what governments do.
Good. Finally a grant you can pretend to be against.
https://labgrownmeat.com/US-Govt-invests-in-lab-grown-meat/
And the market is already deciding.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-10-18-lab-grown-meat-industry-needs-government-subsidies.html
Why does the state have the power to even decide on these things? Just ridiculous.
My guess has always been that economic freedom was so damned obvious to the framers that there was no more reason to enumerate it than to enumerate marriage, or walking, or laughing.
Next step was ignoring the 9th and 10th amendments, and the courts were only too glad to help. What's the point of being a constitutional lawyer or judge if almost everything someone wants government to do is fenced off by the 9th and 10th amendments?
You mean regulating lab grown meat or subsidizing the R&D and marketing of it?
Half of the out-loud and as-stated reason for these bans is the citation that these products are part and parcel to globalist Malthusian social policies/agendas.
And, as indicated, that fact is rather self-evident or revealed. These products aren't being advertised as "in vitro fish protein" right alongside "cross-flow filtered whey protein" for bodybuilders and ozempic users or others to maintain muscle mass while losing weight. It's an explicit skeuomorph aimed at reducing or displacing a class of undesirables. It's SSDD with "The transgender panic is/was just about bathrooms."
"Food" for "thought": if the "chocolate rations" can be "increased from 30g to 20g" why would anyone actually assume they had anything to do with milk or butter or cacao or even chicory root?
If it's lab grown, then it ain't Salmon.
It's a lab experiment.
So, in vitro fertilized embryos aren't human then?
Note to self: Pass on Zeb's next BBQ invitation.
If it tastes fine when smoked and put on an everything bagel, :I can live with eating a lab experiment.
While the cultivated Salmon won't fool any devoted seafood lovers
Fake proteins never do.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwZyoBUIINw
If you can sell lab-grown salmon in Portland, Ore., it must be because they're looking for something like that.