Spain's Grid Collapsed in 5 Seconds. The U.S. Could Be Next.
A massive blackout in Spain shows what happens when energy policy ignores the physics of electricity.

Across Spain and Portugal, more than 50 million people recently experienced the largest blackout in modern European history. Thousands of commuters stood stranded on the concourses of Spain's transit system. In the span of five seconds, 60 percent of the country's electricity supply vanished. This wasn't caused by a storm or a cyberattack—just bad policy and the most underappreciated force in modern engineering giving way: inertia.
When a power plant trips offline or demand suddenly spikes, the power grid has no cushion; it must respond instantly or it unravels. That's where inertia comes in. In coal, gas, and nuclear plants, massive turbine rotors spin at thousands of rpm. Even when power is cut, they keep turning, releasing stored energy that slows frequency shifts and buys precious time—seconds to a minute—for backup to kick in. It's not backup power, it's breathing room. Like the flywheel on a Peloton, it keeps things steady even when input falters.
Once frequency drops too far, automatic protection kicks in. Plants shut down. Substations isolate. The grid severs its own limbs to survive. If imbalance spreads faster than recovery can respond, the collapse cascades. Entire regions go dark—not for lack of power, but lack of time. Even the right answer, a minute late, is no answer at all.
That's what happened in Spain. On April 28, solar energy was generating nearly 18 gigawatts of electricity—more than half of the national demand. Within an hour, more than two-thirds of it disappeared due to what authorities called a "technical fluctuation." Grid frequency plummeted. France tried to send emergency power across the intertie, but the imbalance tripped the connection. In five seconds, the entire Iberian grid collapsed.
Experts/government regulators are unsure if solar power alone caused the failure. But a system hell-bent on pushing renewables certainly ensured that the failure was catastrophic. This wasn't bad luck. It was bad policy made manifest—a sequence I've come to call the Four Horsemen of Grid Failure:
- Subsidized volatility. Between 2018 and 2024, Spain tripled its solar capacity, adding over 20 gigawatts in record time. The boom was fueled by E.U. Green Deal money, domestic tax credits, generous feed-in tariffs, and guaranteed priority access. Renewables didn't compete—they were legally first in line. By midday, solar routinely overwhelmed the grid, forcing other power plants offline. And when it disappeared, as it did that day, there was nothing steady underneath.
- Penalized reliability. In just two years, Spain shut down 15 coal plants—including Teruel and Compostilla II, which together delivered over 2,200 megawatts (MW) of inertia-rich baseload energy. Gas was throttled by greenhouse gas emissions penalties and pricing rules that made it barely worth running. Nuclear energy, once the quiet anchor of the system, was slated for full retirement by 2035. The plants that made the grid resilient weren't just sidelined. They were financially erased.
- Neglected backup. Spain bet on constant supply and perfect conditions with no grid-scale batteries, demand response, or new pumped hydroelectric power. When solar power collapsed and wind stalled, there was no fallback. Even the intertie with France failed under the strain. No margin for error.
- Regulatory arrogance—the fatal assumption that planners could schedule physics. Infrastructure was phased out on ideological timelines, not engineering ones. Models were trusted over operators, warnings were ignored, and the system was made brittle.
And all of it added up to the most dangerous thing a grid can carry: an inertia gap. And, when solar drops out en masse—as it did in April—there's nothing left spinning. The machines that used to smooth those shocks had already been shut down, sidelined, or priced out of existence.
Across the U.S., we're replaying the same mistakes. Texas, through the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), now gets more than 35 percent of its energy from wind and solar—spiking past 80 percent on the right day. But ERCOT is a grid on an island; it can't import help or borrow stability. In 2023, a sudden frequency dip pushed the system into emergency conditions. Massive grid-scale batteries kicked in just in time, averting disaster. But those batteries are expensive band-aids, not baseload. And as Texas pushes to retire more fossil fuel generation by 2030, the gap between supply and stability will only widen. California often hits 100 percent renewable energy during daylight hours, only to fall off a cliff at sundown. Gas plants have to scramble to catch the drop. To simulate the inertia it tore out, California's now installing massive flywheels to mimic the inertia that coal and nuclear used to provide by default.
The rest of the country looks more balanced, on paper at least. But PJM Interconnection—a regional transmission organization that manages the flow of wholesale electricity across 13 states—is set to lose up to 58 gigawatts of firm generation by 2030. With reliability at risk, it's now fast-tracking 11.8 gigawatts of new gas plants just to stay afloat. The Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) isn't far behind. It plans to retire 25 gigawatts of coal and add 10 gigawatts of solar by decade's end. But its own projections show a 4.7 gigawatt shortfall in firm capacity by 2028. And, after shutting down Indian Point, New York is gambling on offshore wind and Canadian hydro to fill its 2,000-megawatt hole.
Stable power is retiring faster than its replacements can show up—stuck in queues, lawsuits, or supply chain hell. We've spent a decade subsidizing volatility, penalizing reliability, and crossing our fingers that storage will arrive on time. Meanwhile, the slow, steady, heavy machines that actually hold the grid together are being dismantled.
Spain's blackout wasn't just a technical failure. It was a political one. A preview of what happens when the Four Horsemen ride unchecked. Because when the turbines stop spinning, it's not just the lights that go out. It's the whole illusion.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
You don't understand - this is a win.
Depends on your point of view.
Maybe not you and me, but somebody wanted this.
Gee, who likes to look down on peasants?
Old men who are fighting the oligarchy?
Welcome to Degrowth. Ain’t it beautiful! Soon we will be living in the Middle Ages again, with life expectancies to match.
Need more research.
More testing needed!
What did socialists use before candles? Electric lights.
The irony of the whole thing is that there is nothing "green" about solar. Solar panels require enormous amounts of energy and rare materials to produce, despoil huge amounts of land, and become toxic waste when they wear out in 20 or so years. There is nothing renewable or green about them. At some point it would be nice if people would understand the power isn't coming from the sun. It is coming from the panel. While the sun may last for billions more years, the panel doesn't.
If you are in an area with a lot of hail - sometimes they don't even last one year.
I laugh when local building codes mandate solar on new construction and then no insurance company will cover them and then nobody getting a loan can qualify.
https://www.jsheld.com/insights/articles/solar-farm-hail-damage-the-perfect-storm
In a 10 year time period I had my roof totaled twice by hail. The first time it also totaled a solar system. People think grapefruit sized hail is scary until they have witnessed pomelo sized hail.
Don't blame green energy. The technology to compensate for loss of inertia energy sources is well know.
https://docs.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/73856.pdf
Since solar awful for the environment, we won't blame "green energy". We will blame solar. Second, that link is to a study about the possibility of that technology and nothing more. It concludes
"The combination of inertia and mechanical frequency response can be replaced to a large extent with electronic-based frequency response from inverter-based resources and fast response from
loads, while maintaining system reliability. Given these solutions, reduced inertia is not an inherent barrier to increased deployment of wind and solar energy. Our reliance on inertia to
date results largely from the legacy use of synchronous generators.
The level of renewable penetration achievable under this new paradigm has yet to be examined in detail, but the Texas grid has already met more than half of its energy demand with wind, and
the other two large U.S. grids should face fewer challenges in achieving even greater levels of penetration, given their larger sizes. Well-understood and already deployed techniques and
technologies can allow for substantially increased use of wind and solar in the U.S. grid without the negative impacts often associated with reduced inertia."
It's called nuclear power.
Completely agreed. Nuclear is clean, safe, elegant, reliable, and bonus super cool. Blue glow FTW.
Nuclear power plants cost too much to build. There was a brief window under Biden when interest rates were low where we could have sold the bonds needed for a large scale nuclear building program, but we missed the chance.
Nobody blames ?green? energy.
They blame the Commie-BS behind ?green? energies existance by 'armed-theft' of the public.
Will you leftards ever THINK long enough to acknowledge all these Commie-BS plans are nothing but criminal-use of Gov-Guns against your neighbors? 'Guns' don't create electricity so Why-TF do you think 'government' should have any useful business being there? The only thing 'government' has that makes it unique is GUNS against people.
Idiot. Without government guns you would have no electricity transmission lines and you would be stuck with rooftop solar.
So the sales of the Foxfire series will spike once again?
Will the Amish put out a series of "Dummies" books?
Will the stock of "candles r us" shoot up?
Will the folly of not teaching how to write with pencil and paper be admitted?
Who is John Galt?
Presently working for a company making battery reserve systems. Unlikely they can be manufactured in sufficient volume at a reasonable price to make a big difference in grid stability.
My guess is that we'll start seeing a lot more companies of all kinds, maybe including condos and residential complexes, with intelligent controllers standing between the grid and backed-up mini-sources.
This will bring along its own set of unintended consequences, of course, but perhaps more amenable to resolution because easier to address incrementally.
Observe the future tense in all Sharknado warmunist wishful thinking. Communists grumble "come the Revolution" and Nazis yodel "when Jesus comes". It takes a libertarian to appreciate here and now.
Thanks to the author for explaining this in a way that even I can grasp. I have nothing against solar, wind or any other energy source. If it's cheaper and more efficient it will sell itself and I'll buy it. But these are not market options they are political mandates and based on what I see as nonsensical criteria. Carbon is a pollutant? Warmer weather is an existential threat? Humans can control the climate? Seriously? Of course it doesn't matter what I think but at least I have a president who won't be shoving this shit down my throat for a while. After which the green dealers will emerge like a parasitic hoard of cicadas to consume whatever wealth I may have left.
If you have never been to Arizona in the summer you don't know how extreme heat is a threat.
'Across Spain and Portugal, more than 50 million people recently experienced the largest blackout in modern European history.'
FAKE NEWS! (Or at least not news.)
Very nice article by someone with a grasp of energy and power engineering--for a change.
Indeed it identifies the stupid policies of both Texas and California.
Only Politicians with 'Guns' can F'Up this bad.
Keep worshiping the 'Guns' for survival and just see where it gets us.
The boom was fueled by E.U. Green Deal money
"Green... Deal..."
I am just racking my brain trying to remember where I've heard that before....
....
:/
Whats a trillion dollars between friends.
https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/climate-energy/eu-power-grid-needs-trillion-dollar-upgrade-avert-spain-style-blackouts-2025-05-05/
And you know it will be at least double.