Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Tariffs

Trump's War on Foreign Films

Plus: Alcatraz reopening, Bukele corruption scandal, assisted suicide, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 5.5.2025 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Man holding an Academy Award | Jennifer Bloc/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom
(Jennifer Bloc/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom)

Foreign films fucked: Another week, another round of tariffs! Yesterday, President Donald Trump said he would be imposing 100 percent tariffs on all foreign films. "WE WANT MOVIES MADE IN AMERICA, AGAIN!" declared Trump, who called foreign films a "national security threat" due to their ability to deliver propaganda to U.S. viewers.

"Other nations have been stealing the…movie-making capability of the United States. I said to a couple of people, 'What do you think?' I have done some very strong research over the last week, and we are making very few movies now," he told reporters over the weekend. "Hollywood is being destroyed. Now you have a grossly incompetent governor that allowed that to happen, so I am not just blaming other nations, but other nations, a lot of them, have stolen our movie industry. If they are not willing to make a movie inside the United States, and we should have a tariff on movies that come in. And not only that, governments are actually giving big money. They are supporting them financially. So that is sort of a threat to our country in a sense."

Reason Roundup inline form

The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Stealing is an odd way of putting it. Did he just learn that other countries make movies too? And, yes, other countries will give special breaks to their film industries, in much the same way U.S. states already do: They vie for business, offering tax credits and other incentives to try to get movie production to their states. (This is why plenty of headlines have heralded Georgia, specifically Atlanta, as "Hollywood of the South.")

It's also difficult to suss out what exactly "foreign" means in this context. Will American crews from American studios who do post-production in America get penalized in some way for shooting on location abroad? "Film and television production in Los Angeles is down by more than one-third over the past 10 years," reports The New York Times. About half of the over-$40-million-budget films were partially produced abroad, sometimes for story reasons, other times for cost savings (which rankles unions back in L.A.). These films remain American, making the "national security" concern even more nonsensical. Is Trump trying to give handouts to movie-industry workers, protecting their jobs from going overseas?

That's not the only part of his complaint that's weird. Is Hollywood really "being destroyed," and is it foreign competition that's mostly responsible? Box office revenue has surely been declining, as people shift to less theater consumption and more at-home consumption; streaming services have shifted to more in-house movie production, with Amazon and Netflix emerging as legitimate competitors to Universal and Paramount and other stalwarts (though a lot of Amazon/Netflix original content is terrible, in my opinion); artificial intelligence may alter the future of screenwriting, much to the guild's chagrin. All of these are pressures Hollywood must adapt to. It's not clear that the biggest challenges facing the industry stem from, like, Walter Salles films, or the decades-old practice of shooting on location abroad.

Trump is generally worried about trade deficits. Lucky for him, the movie industry is a huge exporter to other parts of the world: "According to the Motion Picture Association, the industry generated a positive balance of trade in every major market in the world, with exports 3.1 times that of imports," reports Deadline. "The industry produced $22.6 billion in exports, and $15.3 billion in trade surplus."

As for his concerns about propaganda, I think propaganda and bias in longer-form content tends to be much easier to spot (and reflect on, and glean information from, and think critically about) than in shorter-form content, which can be much more insidious. Regardless of your thoughts on a TikTok ban, Trump appears to have softened his stance there, choosing to extend the date at which a ban is instituted again and again. This leads me to suspect that he's not actually worried about propaganda, but is just experimenting with using "national security" justifications for all manner of big-government interventions—a time-honored American tradition, but not a good one. Regardless, it is not the government's job to shield us from ideas, even propagandistic ones.

A tariff on foreign films is not the most pressing threat to our liberty. But it's yet another sign of Trump's preference for protectionism and his comfort limiting what types of products you have access to, sometimes for no real reason at all.


Scenes from New York: "According to a new report by the city comptroller, Brad Lander, the city is sitting on at least 7,000 unpaid invoices from nonprofits, some dating back years, totaling over $1 billion," reports The New York Times. "This is money for groups that shelter the homeless, provide child and elder care, feed hungry New Yorkers, counsel the mentally ill, protect domestic violence victims and provide legal services to immigrants and defendants who can't afford lawyers." And that $1 billion figure may in fact be an undercount.


QUICK HITS

  • "President Donald Trump said Sunday that he has ordered several agencies to rebuild and reopen Alcatraz, an infamous federal penitentiary that closed in the 1960s and has since become a popular tourist destination," reports The Washington Post. "In a post on social media, Trump said he directed the Federal Bureau of Prisons, the Homeland Security Department, the Justice Department and others to work together to open a 'substantially enlarged and rebuilt' Alcatraz that would house the country's 'most ruthless and violent' offenders." Since Alcatraz is an island, getting supplies in and out is expensive; it's unclear how exactly Trump plans to pay for his idea.
  • A good read from Reason's Eric Boehm: "5 Times the Trump Team Told Americans To Accept Being Poorer"
  • The Central American news outlet El Faro recently released footage of "leaders of the 18th Street Revolucionarios gang who not only cut deals for years with the entourage of [President] Nayib Bukele, but also escaped the country with the complicity of his government" and who revealed "details about the agreements that permitted Bukele's ascent to total power." Now, Bukele's attorney general's office is allegedly preparing arrest warrants for some El Faro journalists.
  • Last week an assisted suicide bill passed New York's Assembly. Now it must go through the Senate and be signed into law by Governor Kathy Hochul. If that happens, it would become the 11th U.S. state to permit legalized suicide for certain patients.
  • Meanwhile, the U.K. is also considering assisted suicide, including permitting pregnant women to kill themselves if eligible. I am probably in the minority of libertarians here, but the global expansion of physician-assisted suicide does not feel like moral progress to me:

Utterly bleak prospect imagined here for the future of assisted dying, so perhaps the least important point is that the government can barely bring itself to say 'mother' or 'woman', preferring 'pregnant person'.

(This document is recent, released yesterday) pic.twitter.com/AWdy1BDKWI

— The Other Half (@OtherHalfOrg) May 3, 2025

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: FBI Warns of Swatting Amid a Wave of Politically Motivated Attacks

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

TariffsHollywoodMoviesFree TradeProtectionismTrump AdministrationCultureSuicideEl SalvadorPoliticsReason Roundup
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (274)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Yesterday, President Donald Trump said he would be imposing 100 percent tariffs on all foreign films.

    Subtitles suck. SPEAK ENGLISH ALREADY.

    1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   1 year ago

      At least trump knows it's mainly California that is destroying hollywood

      1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   1 year ago

        Not sure if California counts as America anymore. They should tariff them just to stay safe.

        1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   1 year ago

          I'm in California and I want all of the rest of the states to stop importing food to Cali. Starve off the Marxists cancers

          1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

            They already stopped importing oil. Let's do water next.

            1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   1 year ago

              I'm down for that. I have a huge distiller I use for water already

          2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

            https://thehill.com/policy/equilibrium-sustainability/5280032-california-fuel-refinery-closures-gas-prices-newsom/

            Multiple refineries in California have recently declared their intentions to shutter operations, leaving the Golden State uncertain about future fuel supplies and impacts on prices at the pump.

            Sanjay Varshney, a finance professor at California State University, Sacramento, had a different outlook on the fuel predicament, arguing that the Golden State is coping with “self-inflicted wounds.”

            The higher prices at the pump, he contended, reflect California’s higher gas taxes, the state’s stricter fuel blend requirements and the lack of transportation pipelines.

            Varshney said that because Newsom has both historically “used the oil industry as a punching bag” and told “them that they are basically rogues and scoundrels,” doing business right now makes for “interesting” circumstances.

            “The companies are fed up, so they leave,” he added.

        2. Eeyore   1 year ago

          Couldn't the US just ban footage shot in Canada?

          1. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

            No ones going to watch that anyway.

            1. Eeyore   1 year ago

              I thought a bunch of the Disney/Marvel shit was filmed in Toronto?

            2. EISTAU Gree-Vance   1 year ago

              Well, there was some high drama filmed in Winnipeg last night…..

    2. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   1 year ago

      MAMA
      Make American movies again

    3. Eeyore   1 year ago

      Is there even a market for that many traditional films? The theater that I haven't been to in 5 years, when I drive by it it doesn't seem to rotate very often. Maybe 1 or 2 hits per yeat that fill the parking lot for a single evening.

    4. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      And yet I would far rather watch a subtitled movie than a dubbed one.

    5. JFree   1 year ago

      Tariffs on movies will, in retaliation, result in tariffs on Hollywood exports. Soon enough the world will stop speaking English.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    WE WANT MOVIES MADE IN AMERICA, AGAIN!

    And no censoring the gay shit for China.

    1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

      What about the pro black shit? China really hates that part.

      1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

        Can we get AI to master color shading?

      2. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   1 year ago

        Rip rdj in tropic thunder.

        1. Rocinante   1 year ago

          At least we can say, “Never go full retard” now.

    2. Bipedal Humanoid   1 year ago

      Extra gay shit for China. Extended director's cut gay shit.

    3. Eeyore   1 year ago

      Ban the export of any movie to China that doesn't have at least one prominent product placement for Winnie-the-Pooh.

    4. Zeb   1 year ago

      If you want to improve Hollywood, export duties on movies going to China would probably be more useful.

  3. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    ...the city is sitting on at least 7,000 unpaid invoices from nonprofits, some dating back years, totaling over $1 billion...

    The Big Apple was DOGE before DOGE was a thing.

  4. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

    It is unconstitutional to do audits of the federal government. We can't have things like this discovered.

    Elizabeth MacDonald
    @LizMacDonaldFOX
    Thousands of federal workers as low as budget analysts have signature authority over disbursing your taxpayer $ via things like Quickbook accounts & have been accused of embezzling & fraud to the GAO. A State Dept. budget analyst in the protocol office just pled guilty to stealing more than $657K via her signature authority over a common Quickbooks checking account fm 3/22 to 4/24.

    She wrote 5 dozen checks to herself and 3 more to an individual with whom she had a personal relationship, but then changed the listed payee in the Quickbooks system to an actual State Department vendor. No one would have caught this without an audit.

    There are more than 2,000 Quickbook accounts throughout the federal government that are ripe for a Doge audit. The GAO’s Fraudnet got 4,044 fraud allegations against thousands of federal workers in just 2023 alone at 50 agencies including the Pentagon, the DOJ and the Treasury Dept.

    The GAO already estimated taxpayers lose between $231B-$521B annually including by federal workers and contractors embezzling and committing fraud. That money could go towards tax cuts for you.

    1. Social Justice is neither   1 year ago

      But they might get audit fatigue if you ask them what they're spending money on.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    ...Trump said he directed the Federal Bureau of Prisons, the Homeland Security Department, the Justice Department and others to work together to open a 'substantially enlarged and rebuilt' Alcatraz that would house the country's 'most ruthless and violent' offenders.

    You know what ain't no dumb foreign film? The Rock.

    1. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

      I smell what you're cookin

    2. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

      Since Alcatraz is an island, getting supplies in and out is expensive; it's unclear how exactly Trump plans to pay for his idea.

      I think someone forgot about Gitmo.

      1. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

        Build a bridge, like they want to do to Hawaii.

        1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   1 year ago

          As long as it's foot-traffic only.

          1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

            Too many big trucks could tip the island over.

        2. Eeyore   1 year ago

          First step is we need to amend the constitution so that government employees and law makers can only travel by horseback. No carriages even.

        3. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

          BIDEN: "We have plans to build a railroad from the Pacific all the way across the Indian Ocean,"

          1. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

            HiS mEnTaL dEcLiNe WaS nOt ObViOuS!!!

      2. mad.casual   1 year ago

        We need to repeal The Jones Act so that China can build ships large enough to ferry goods efficiently within the bay so that Alcatraz isn't such a shithole.

      3. JFree   1 year ago

        And about Mexico. They still ain't paid for the wall. About time we impose an Alcatraz tariff on them seeing as how it's Spanish

    3. Wizzle Bizzle   1 year ago

      If you don't know about the only supermax in the country, you should look it up. It's in Florence, Colorado, and every famous piece of shit is rotting away there, alone, without daylight. It's glorious and fascinating.

      If you're interested in such things, you should also read about Fremont County where it's located. Prisons are their only industry, aside from the Royal Gorge and summer rafting tours. There are 15 prisons located in that one rural county. Quite a place to visit (by choice).

      1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

        I did a rafting tour in Fremont a couple years ago. Highly recommend.

      2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

        This is also why activating Alcatraz again isn't really needed. Besides Supermax, we already have other high-security prisons in other parts of the country to put the worst pieces of human shit away for the rest of their life.

        This is where Trump's Gephardt Democrat sensibilities tend to emerge. He really does seem to want to restore the US to roughly where it was at in 1965.

        1. Wizzle Bizzle   1 year ago

          Agreed. Same reason he still thinks legacy media is prestigious. Which is particularly ironic since he's the one who pretty much killed it.

  6. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

    One day a Boehm prediction will turn out right. Stopped clocks and all.

    https://justthenews.com/government/white-house/india-may-be-dam-gives-way-cascading-series-trade-deals

    1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

      If he told me the sky is blue, I'd go outside and check.

      1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   1 year ago

        I'd go grab my camera because it would be guaranteed to be avocado green or something.

  7. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    5 Times the Trump Team Told Americans To Accept Being Poorer

    I guess suddenly we don't want a culture of austerity coming from the White House.

  8. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

    An alarming new movement insists that sexual attraction to minors is not a psychiatric disorder to be managed but an identity to be affirmed. Leading this effort is B4U-ACT, a Maryland-based organization founded in 2003 to support pedophiles, or as they call them, “Minor-Attracted Persons” (MAPs). From May 2 through May 4, 2025, the group will host a conference in Ohio to train mental-health providers in “affirmative MAP therapy,” which seeks to help clients accept their “age of attraction” as an intrinsic and valid part of their identity.

    https://www.city-journal.org/article/b4u-act-maryland-pedophiles-map-therapy

    1. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

      chemjeff and buttplug smile

    2. Randy Sax   1 year ago

      Can we put a few cyber trucks in the room? Hopefully get it firebombed.

      1. mad.casual   1 year ago
    3. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

      The abuse they dole out to children during transitioning should tell us everything we need to know.

      This shit will begin with 16-year-olds, and in a decade it will be targeting 5-year-olds. Anyone who opposes it will be deemed bigots and haters. MollyG will arrive shortly to tell us the parents who murder molesters are monsters.

      1. See.More   1 year ago

        . . . and in a decade it will be targeting 5-year-olds.

        Not even a decade...
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjpZnHrQsh4
        https://www.tiktok.com/@mixedkiidsig/video/7473967950807010590

    4. mad.casual   1 year ago

      I hope this is an ICE sting or they cancel it over fear of being raided by ICE and Reason, once again, champions pedophilia (and illegal immigration) over the mere existence of ICE.

      It's a great way to get, not just the pedophiles, but the "mental health professionals" who will ignore the mountain of their field's own data, as well as the ethical and legal considerations about the damage such behavior does to minors who can't consent, in order to facilitate this behavior.

      1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

        the "mental health professionals" who will ignore the mountain of their field's own data, as well as the ethical and legal considerations about the damage such behavior does to minors who can't consent

        This is why credentialism is so intrinsic to the Marxist movement. They chased most sane people out of academia and control who and who cannot be considered a professional.

        The APA and AMA have shown their cards they are in the bag for groomers and are now pushing for outright legalization of child molestation.

        Oh, and fuck you, Jeffy for all your lies that this was not happening.

        1. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   1 year ago

          You’ll note Lying Jeffy ignored this story.

      2. VinniUSMC   1 year ago

        as well as the ethical and legal considerations about the damage such behavior does to minors who can't consent, in order to facilitate this behavior.

        If they can consent to sex change, certainly they can consent to sex. -Jeffsarc and Buttplug say while drooling over the prospect

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

          If they can consent to sex change, certainly they can consent to sex.

          You're being sarcastic, but it's very much how these people think. Their whole purpose is to destroy the idea that childhood should be a time of innocence, because queering these kids out and making them pedobait is how they believe the marxist utopia comes to fruition. Innocent kids aren't going to function like activists, but politically radicalized ones will.

          1. Zeb   1 year ago

            It's bad when you find yourself pining for the sensible Marxists of yesteryear.

          2. mad.casual   1 year ago

            And then, to my original point, they'll turn around on both issues and say "Most of these kids have been sexually abused and exploited from a young age. It has caused them much emotional and psychological distress that makes them much more likely than their peers to harm themselves and potentially others. That's why we should support, obfuscate for, and facilitate the pedophiles who abused them."

    5. Wizzle Bizzle   1 year ago

      Gee, if only everyone on the right had said 20 years ago this is where all of the sexuality cultism was heading. And just like the "Nobody is teaching CRT to your children" lie, we were told equating pedophiles with every other flavor of sexual deviation was a slanderous right-wing conspiracy. Annnndddd here we are.

      1. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

        MAPs are far more common than we would like to admit.

        https://ethicsalarms.com/2016/05/02/yecchh-the-daily-caller-and-its-commenters-cheer-on-sexual-predator-teachers/

        1. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   1 year ago

          Who’s “we”?

        2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

          So in your opinion crude humor is the same as funding a charity to normalize actual pedophiles? And you had to go to 2016 to do so?

      2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

        This programming was done more under SEL than CRT. Same critical theory, different avenue.

      3. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

        It's honestly pretty surprising how a lot of the predictions about American society that the 1980s-era crank evangelical tracts made have ended up coming to pass.

    6. Rick James   1 year ago

      Um, guys, how many times have I posted LGBTQI2MAP+

      Did no one ever ask me what MAP stands for? Do I have to think of everything, people?

      1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   1 year ago

        I’m still not clear on the I2, so map just sounds like technical mumbo jumbo to me….

        And I don’t even wanna know what the + is for.

    7. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   1 year ago

      How much tax dollars is this organization getting?

    8. Social Justice is neither   1 year ago

      Just so long as the exits for the health providers involved all end in woodchippers it's not all bad.

  9. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

    Western Lensman
    @WesternLensman
    Sept 2024: Schumer explains what Dems really want for the millions of illegals in the US:

    “The ultimate goal is to…get a path to citizenship for all 11 million or however many undocumented there are here."

    The left and their activist judiciary are fighting tooth and nail to keep as many illegals in the country as possible for a reason.

    Video

    https://x.com/WesternLensman/status/1918791398637146236

    Wonder why sarc, Molly, and other democrats want to keep the illegals here...

    1. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

      chemjeff smiles

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

        I would absolutely smile at the idea of amnesty for peaceful hardworking migrants who aren't violent criminals. It's a waste of resources for the government to track these people down and deport them. Plus as we are seeing, their efforts are undermining the standards of due process for everyone, not just for migrants.

        For example, please tell us why it's a good use of the government's resources to literally tackle him and send him away:

        https://www.newsweek.com/man-who-came-us-toddler-married-us-citizen-detained-ice-2067654

        He came to this country when he was 1 year old. He lives in suburban Spokane. He's married to a citizen, has a family, and has a steady job. Or at least he used to, until government agents literally tackled him on his own front yard and sent him away.

        When you all defend crap like this, it makes it very plain the real reason why you all support 'mass deportation'. It is not really about enforcing the law. It is because you think they are 'bad people', and BECAUSE they are 'bad people', that is why they break laws. It's about ridding the country of an inferior subclass of vermin. So you would never support amnesty even if they came here as toddlers and grew up here, and you will support authoritarian overreach to kick them out because when your 'house' is infested with vermin, no effort is spared to rid the place of the infestation.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   1 year ago

          Yet again, you conflate legal immigration with illegal aliens. No one is talking about stopping legal immigrants from becoming citizens unless they did something nefarious such as blatantly and intentionally lying on their forms.

          1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   1 year ago

            "Yet again, you conflate legal immigration with illegal aliens.

            Every - single - fucking - time.

            Because outside of conflation and phony appeals to emotion he has no practicable argument against deportation of illegal aliens.

            All he can do is lie and smear his opponent as a racist.

        2. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   1 year ago

          Just look at Lying Jeffy go!

        3. sarcasmic   1 year ago

          I would absolutely smile at the idea of amnesty for peaceful hardworking migrants who aren't violent criminals.

          We've already learned from drug warriors that someone who disobeys drug laws has no respect for any laws, so they need to be locked up before they commit murder.
          It's the same with illegals. Crossing the border illegally means they have no respect for any laws, so they need to be deported or locked up before they commit murder.
          It's the same reasoning.
          Besides, they are illegal. Their very existence is illegal. And the law must be obeyed. Unless Trump doesn't like it. Then the law doesn't matter. But for illegals the law is the law.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   1 year ago

            Are you done with your strawmen and false equivalencies?

            1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   1 year ago

              Never. They're as dear to him as a magnum of Boone's Farm.

        4. Nobartium   1 year ago

          The last time amnesty was offered, the border was supposed to be secure. It never was, therefore, there will be amnesty only over our cold, dead collective hands.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   1 year ago

            Democrats lied. People died.

          2. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

            As I said, authoritarian overreach is totally justified in order to rid the nation of the vermin infestation.

            1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

              If only there was a final solution for the illegals problem. Deporting them doesn't guarantee that they won't come back. There has to be something more... permanent.

              1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   1 year ago

                Only in your own drunken mind, Sarc.

            2. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   1 year ago

              Is authoritarian overreach required to jail trespassers for long sentences and shoot them dead? Is it needed to maintain graft for politicians and bureaucrats? Please, Jeffy, let us know.

            3. EISTAU Gree-Vance   1 year ago

              Well Jeff, maybe if your side hadn’t let things get so out of control we wouldn’t be where we are right now.

              Take some responsibility.

              1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

                I'm not responsible for the decisions of your team, sorry not sorry.

        5. Marshal   1 year ago

          When you all defend crap like this, it makes it very plain the real reason why you all support 'mass deportation'. It is not really about enforcing the law. It is because you think they are 'bad people',

          It's pretty amusing Jeffey contradicted himself in his own story since it shows they are focused on the law and not the person. But propagandists will always claim any event supports their political preference. Reality is irrelevant.

        6. Marshal   1 year ago

          Reading Jeffey's internal monologue that illegal aliens are vermin is a little eye opening. I thought Squirrelsy was the resident mentally ill commenter, but he needs to share the title.

    2. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   1 year ago

      They hate the us

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

        The people who hate the US are the ones who want to destroy our liberties in their delusional 'mass deportation' campaign.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   1 year ago

          You’re the delusional one, idiot.

          1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

            Jeff loves the taking and giving of taxpayer money to subsidize the globe.

  10. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

    Germany still not a big deal? Guess you guys can't criticize them with how light you were on spying on Trump.

    https://legalinsurrection.com/2025/05/germanys-intel-agency-designates-afd-party-as-extremist-paves-way-for-possible-ban/

    1. Moonrocks   1 year ago

      This is what democracy looks like.

      1. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

        Lawfare on Trump, lawfare on LePen, lawfare on georgescu, and Germany is about to ban a party with a large amount of support.

        The 'democracy' folks sure are getting real comfortable making sure no one can vote for their opponents, rather than making a rational case against them

        1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   1 year ago

          The 'democracy' folks are sure taking a lot of their tricks from the fascists.

        2. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   1 year ago

          It’s all part of the George Soros plan, as he wrote back in 1993.

          1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

            Shrike and Charlie hated that evidence.

            1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   1 year ago

              Data republican was even nice enough to share the link to Soros’s own words: https://www.georgesoros.com/1993/11/01/toward-a-new-world-order-the-future-of-nato/

              They’re right there, in black and white for all to read, not unlike a certain mustache man who wrote about his struggle.

              1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

                Gosh, what a coincidence that Mr. Show Me The Evidence himself, chemtard radical deathfat, had the same reaction when I cited Klaus Schwab's own COVID missives regarding the WEF's grand plans for remaking the world in its image.

          2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

            Speaking of which...

            https://twitchy.com/samj/2025/05/02/george-soros-thread-datarepublican-n2412277

            Today's systems of NGOs isn't accidental - it was laid out in a vision 30 years ago by none other than George Soros.

            ...

            I want to walk you through an essay which Mike pointed me to- a chilling essay written in 1993 by George Soros, "Toward a New World Order: The Future of NATO"

            The essay lays out a new mission for NATO after the cold war. NATO would no longer be a defensive alliance against Russia - that is obsolete. Instead, it would proactively go out and shape other countries into "open societies."

            Why did everyone go along with this model? Simple. Enormous amounts of money was involved. Here's a list who benefited:

            NGO Networks (Open Society Foundations, USAID, NED)
            → More influence, more contracts, more justification for expansion

            Bureaucrats & Diplomats→ Career advancement via “democracy-building” missions International

            Donors & Foundations→ Steer reforms through grant-making power

            IMF & World Bank→ Lend to reforming nations in exchange for austerity + influence

            Private Equity & Multinationals→ Buy up privatized industries on the cheap (telecoms, oil, infrastructure)

            Western-Aligned Politicians→ Receive aid, praise, and protection... even if they’re corrupt or undemocratic

            Post-Communist Oligarchs→ Enrich themselves through Western-advised privatization

            Journalists & Activists→ Funded by Western grants, shielded from local accountability

            Professors & Think Tanks→ Get fellowships, scholarships, media access for pushing "open" values

            Big Tech→ Enter new markets post-liberalization (data access, censorship tools, ad revenue)

            Mainstream Media→ Shape narratives, control legitimacy labels: “reformer” vs “strongman”

            1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   1 year ago

              That’s the one that had Charliehall up in arms.

            2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

              This is basically how Putin ended up in power--the globalist puppet, Yeltsin, was such a drunk fuck-up that it permanently destroyed the fledging idea of democracy in the Russian mind, and they got Putin in charge to straighten things out.

              What's really driven the western establishment nuts about Putin is that he's proven impervious to all of their attempts at pushing a color revolution on him, and that's mainly because he made Russia a closed society, specifically to the NGO/bureaucrat complex and the Soros octopus. Open societies are far easier to manipulate and subvert when they don't fall in line.

        3. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

          They literacy say my or our democracy. They mean the democracy for their party, not those outside of it.

        4. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

          Romania is struggling. They called an election do over and arrested the "far right" candidate and the "far right" just got even more votes yesterday.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   1 year ago

            Goddamn, the EU must be sweating bullets right now.

            https://x.com/w3bsag3/status/1919157046693306439?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA

            Elections in Romania - 42% of the votes have been counted:

            Right-wing candidate George Simeon leads with about 43%. If he manages to get more than 50%, there will be no second round.

            If the right wins elections, it will be a revolution in Romania. The EU is biting its nails.

    2. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   1 year ago

      Don't worry the opposition party had a secret investigation and cited secret evidence for the conclusion

      1. mad.casual   1 year ago

        Do you think Vernunft Magazine is reporting on the banning of "AfD gang members" for lack tattoos or do you think they're treating it more like the way Reason has treated people detained on Jan. 6th?

    3. Nobartium   1 year ago

      They will never be shamed into covering something that makes "liberal democracy" look the fraud that it is.

  11. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    The Central American news outlet El Faro recently released footage of "leaders of the 18th Street Revolucionarios gang who not only cut deals for years with the entourage of [President] Nayib Bukele...

    If you will indulge me in some victim blaming here, one has to wonder if this seemingly sudden interest in this story has anything to do with a certain Oval Office visit recently.

    1. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   1 year ago

      Does entourage have a more official meaning in El Salvadore?

  12. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    If that happens, it would become the 11th U.S. state to permit legalized suicide for certain patients.

    This is, of course, outside of the state-assisted euthanasia that took place in New York nursing homes during COVID.

    1. Wizzle Bizzle   1 year ago

      Or the state-assisted euthanasia that took place under restorative justice in Oakland, Seattle, Portland, Denver, San Francisco, Baltimore, Chicago, Los Angeles, St Louis, etc, etc.

  13. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

    “My office has obtained Biden administration emails regarding the investigation and later prosecution of Peter Navarro,” Grassley wrote. “These communications provide a behind-the-scenes snapshot of some of the actions taken by the FBI’s Washington Field Office (WFO) to investigate Navarro for contempt of Congress and obstruction.”
    ...
    Shero wrote that the United States Attorney’s Office of Washington, D.C., “will send the unsealed indictment and notice of his initial appearance to reporters. Sending that information out once he is arrested will hopefully keep media from waiting for him to show up out front. Following his IA, USAO will issue a press release.”

    https://thefederalist.com/2025/05/02/newly-released-emails-show-politicized-fbi-targeting-trump-officials-for-obeying-the-law/

    How the Biden administration coordinated to arrest trumps team.

    1. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   1 year ago

      Oh yeah? TARIFFS! So there.

    2. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   1 year ago

      Pam Bondi and Kash Patel have to charge these guys with the maximum. The punishment needs to be so severe that no inside group even thinks about pulling these fascist stunts again for 100 years.

  14. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Meanwhile, the U.K. is also considering assisted suicide, including permitting pregnant women to kill themselves if eligible.

    This really just refers to the stoning of women who become preggers outside of marriage.

    1. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

      What about those who got pregnant from 'Asian grooming gangs.'

      1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   1 year ago

        Everything I've read from the UK police and the groomer's lawyers say that the children are indeed sluts and whores.

        1. Wizzle Bizzle   1 year ago

          It's their own fault. They should have identified as homosexual boys. Then they would have received all sorts of special protections.

          1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   1 year ago

            They are gaslighting homosexual boys into thinking they are girls and cutting off their wieners. They should just identify as trans.

      2. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   1 year ago

        Those girls are kafir, so it’s ok to rape them and get them pregnant.

    2. Eeyore   1 year ago

      Define eligible? Isn't not being dead yet sufficient state of being to make becoming dead a possibility?

      Sorry. You have an unpaid parking ticket. As soon as you pay it we can kill you.

      1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

        Sorry. You have an unpaid parking ticket. As soon as you pay it we can kill you.

        Why can't I laugh at that? It is hilariously funny, but so plausible it makes me sad instead.

        1. Eeyore   1 year ago

          I was denied a fishing license for this reason. I figured they were about the same.

    3. Minadin   1 year ago

      The UK has already committed assisted suicide.

  15. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

    "According to a new report by the city comptroller, Brad Lander, the city is sitting on at least 7,000 unpaid invoices from nonprofits, some dating back years, totaling over $1 billion," reports The New York Times. "This is money for groups that shelter the homeless, provide child and elder care, feed hungry New Yorkers, counsel the mentally ill, protect domestic violence victims and provide legal services to immigrants and defendants who can't afford lawyers." And that $1 billion figure may in fact be an undercount.

    How many of these people were actually helped? This is graft. Just like we saw with USAID.

    1. Wizzle Bizzle   1 year ago

      The people living in those Manhattan apartments overlooking Central Park were helped quite a bit. Are you telling me you dont think they deserve to live with dignity?

    2. Quicktown Brix   1 year ago

      Is it graft if they're not getting paid?

    3. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      "MO MONEY FO' DEM PROGRAMS!"

  16. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

    A good read from Reason's Eric Boehm: "5 Times the Trump Team Told Americans To Accept Being Poorer

    Narrator: it was not a good read.

    1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   1 year ago

      What, you don't like reading fantasy fiction?

      1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

        Hey if you don't support 1T in credit card debt to buy cheap shit from China you're anti free market.

      2. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

        The "fan" in fan-fiction comes from "fanatic". Which makes much more sense considering the author.

  17. Randy Sax   1 year ago

    though a lot of Amazon/Netflix original content is terrible, in my opinion

    Most netflix originals in particular are god awful.

    1. Super Scary   1 year ago

      And they aren't even "so bad they're good" tier like those old Sci-fi originals.

      1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

        Those "so bad they're good" movies had super low budgets and hammy acting that made them kinda charming in their own way. The netflix stuff always have massively bloated budgets (for hiring guys like the rock, ryan renolds, kevin heart, etc.) and take themselves way to seriously.

      2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        oops, lance henriksen is apparently not dead yet.

    2. mad.casual   1 year ago

      though a lot of Amazon/Netflix original content is terrible, in my opinion

      Wait, foisting acontextual and even mistranslated or misunderstood cultural noise across borders to make a cheap buck isn't always desirable (and is sometimes buoyed by social and technological optimism)? Huh.

  18. Sarah Palin's Buttplug - Jan 6 = 9/11 (same motive)   1 year ago

    '"5 Times the Trump Team Told Americans To Accept Being Poorer"

    Carter Malaise Award winner 2025.

    1. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

      Remember when you posted click bait about fast food loss leader promotions as proof there was no inflation?

    2. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   1 year ago

      Remember when you posted a downturn in precious metals prices as proof that inflation wasn't happening?

    3. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   1 year ago

      turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

    4. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   1 year ago

      Remember when you got your original account banned for posting dark web child porn links?

  19. Super Scary   1 year ago

    "Since Alcatraz is an island, getting supplies in and out is expensive; it's unclear how exactly Trump plans to pay for his idea."

    Micro-tariffs!

    1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

      Just hope there's no penguins on the island.

      1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   1 year ago

        Why not? I hear penguins are a great source of tax revenue.

    2. NCMB   1 year ago

      Replica Viking ships paid for by a 200% tariff on imported replica Viking ships. If the oars are manned by the “facility guests” and supervised by cat-o-nail tails equipped trans women coxswains the idea should get democrat support.

      1. Wizzle Bizzle   1 year ago

        There are a lot of layers to this. I think you offended everyone, which makes you okay in my book.

        1. NCMB   1 year ago

          Gracias. And that’s supposed to be cat-o-nine tails….

  20. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   1 year ago

    I think the US should have the same law about tictok as the country that creates it

  21. Stupid Government Tricks   1 year ago

    I'd say it's more a sign that Trump 2.0 is off his rocker compared to Trump 1.0. His four years in the wilderness has given him TDS too. At least he's not senile.

    A tariff on foreign films is not the most pressing threat to our liberty. But it's yet another sign of Trump's preference for protectionism and his comfort limiting what types of products you have access to, sometimes for no real reason at all.

    Tariffs on foreign movies. What a joke. The TDS excuses will be marvelous to behold.

  22. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

    The Central American news outlet El Faro recently released footage of "leaders of the 18th Street Revolucionarios gang who not only cut deals for years with the entourage of [President] Nayib Bukele, but also escaped the country with the complicity of his government" and who revealed "details about the agreements that permitted Bukele's ascent to total power." Now, Bukele's attorney general's office is allegedly preparing arrest warrants for some El Faro journalists.

    Wait, what? Third-world dictator is corrupt? But he's the guy who brought law and order and peace and tranquility back to El Salvador. Plus I am told he is a trustworthy and honest guy who would never mistreat prisoners in his gulag. How can this possibly be?

    1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   1 year ago

      Charli’s Confessions: Interview with Gang Leader who Pacted with Nayib Bukele

      Zero evidence he's telling the truth, and they certainly paid him enough, but at least this isn't one of your "Anonymous Sources".

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

        No I understand, "anonymous sources" are only acceptable when shipping migrants to foreign gulags.

        1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   1 year ago

          That source wasn't "anonymous" you lying, disingenuous fuck. They just didn't release his name to the public. The officers, officials, lawyers and the court all knew exactly who he was.

          But you know that. Why is everything have to be a lie with you, you shitty DNC politruk? Can't you try NOT being dishonest for once?

          1. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   1 year ago

            Lying Jeffy lies. It’s what he does.

          2. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

            In Garcia's case, the "anonymous informant" was anonymous TO GARCIA and his lawyers. He never had the opportunity to challenge this source directly about his claims.

            Would you support a system being used against you? Anonymous sources being used to send you to prison?

            1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   1 year ago

              You did. See: J6ers for more.

              1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

                Jan. 6 defendants had a constitutional right to challenge any witnesses against them, even if they were anonymous. See: Sixth Amendment.

                Do you think immigrants should have this same right?

            2. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

              We didn't send him to prison pedo. We deported him to his home country, which put him in prison for crimes he comitted there.

              Always with the lies.

              1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

                This is bullshit retconning. He was sent deliberately *to that prison*. He has zero criminal record in El Salvador. Garcia is in that prison because of our government's actions.

            3. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   1 year ago

              "In Garcia's case, the "anonymous informant" was anonymous TO GARCIA and his lawyers."

              SO GARCIA AND HIS MS-13 HOMIES DIDN'T MURDER THE FUCK OUT OF HIM FOR SQUEALING YOU DISINGENOUS CRETIN. THIS HAPPENS IN MOB AND GANGBANGER TRIALS TOO.

              The officers, officials, (COURT) lawyers and the court all knew exactly who he was.

              1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

                This is circular logic. The only evidence that Garcia is in a gang is due to the say-so of an anonymous informant, but Garcia can't challenge this anonymous informant because he is supposedly in a gang.

                In a criminal trial involving gangs and mobsters, even the gangsters have a constitutional right to challenge the testimony of witnesses against them, even anonymous informants. So no it doesn't happen in mob and gangster trials, or at least it shouldn't.

                You're making shit up and because you think it sounds convincing you hope everyone will believe you.

          3. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

            Yet again, you lie to cover for your team.

            1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   1 year ago

              Pure projection by chemjeff.

            2. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

              Where is the lie pedo?

            3. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   1 year ago

              WHAT'S THE "LIE", LYING JEFFY?

    2. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   1 year ago

      “Plus I am told he is a trustworthy and honest guy who would never mistreat prisoners in his gulag.”

      By who?

      1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   1 year ago

        Lying Jeffy's gonna lie.

      2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        Was going to ask that question myself.

  23. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   1 year ago

    "A good read from Reason's Eric Boehm: "

    Liz you started with a statement that is in no way true
    Edit: unless it's bohem suicide leter

    1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

      A suicide note blaming Trump for his suicide?

      1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   1 year ago

        As log as the conclusion is the same who cares?

        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   1 year ago

          Perhaps a murder/murder/suicide note featuring the TDS-addled slimy piles of shit Tuccille, Sullum and Bohem.

          1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   1 year ago

            Low ball offer, throw in fiona

          2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

            Just don't swat them.

  24. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

    Hollywood is being destroyed.

    1. Hasn't that been a conservative dream to destroy Hollyweird?

    2. I blame Tyler Perry.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   1 year ago

      Hollywood is kind of destroying itself.

      1. Wizzle Bizzle   1 year ago

        Not "kind of". Anyone watch The Last of Us? Started off well enough in the first season. High budget, not a lot of concentration required. It alsways had gay themes, which Im told is true to the video game it was based on. Fine.

        Until this season, when it turned into pride power hour, where every 100-pound girl can literally manhandle a 200-pound male, as long as the girl is gay and the man is a white homophobe. It's like they scanned Reddit for young adult queer fan fiction. We get two minutes of laughable action for every 58 minutes of lecturing and preening. THIS is why Hollywood is dying.

        1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

          The second game (that season 2 is based off) is controversial in it's own right. It makes you switch characters to the "bad guy" halfway through. Then it rams it's message down your throat "see other people have bad stuff happen to them toooo, so be nice to the lady that killed your dad" No.

          1. Wizzle Bizzle   1 year ago

            Good to know. Seacrest out.

          2. damikesc   1 year ago

            The second game was f'n awful. And the show handled the killing of Joel WORSE (a lot worse) than the game did (in the game, Joel had no clue why they wanted him dead. Took hours to find out why).

            Why the creators did not see that the response to the sequel was WAY more negative than the original game is lost on me. Except that the writer sucked writing the second game and is not better with the show.

            1. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

              The guy who wrote it is a lefty goofball who is doubling down. He 'subverted expectations' by killing off the fan favorite awesome character, then making you play as the whiny preachy lesbian and the crazy unrealistic body builder sized girl who kills him (the writer has a very clear muscle mommy strongk womxn fetish). Funny, they couldn't find an actress that fit those proportions...I wonder why.

              He doubled down when the game got massive hate (but of course, endless 10/10 reviews from all the mainstream outlets who...funny...seemed to be all going out of business because they spend their time wondering why bigot gamers hate the games they love), and he isnt going to change course for the TV show, as he already doubled down hard on his choice. And hey, look at that, massive review numbers tanking, and also the ratings took a massive hit after they killed him off in the show too. Who would have thought people dont want to just watch bitchy preachy woke teenagers.

              1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

                South Park: Vice-principal Strong Woman competes in a strongwoman competition where she is the reigning champion. Macho Man has "transitioned" and competes, too.

                https://youtu.be/wxDaiyREBPw

              2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

                Maybe HBO thought they could make some money off of the initial interest, but shit, everyone who played the games knew what was coming.

                The stupid part is that people will still play wokey games. Red Dead Redemption 2 and Baldur's Gate 3 are massively woke in their political messaging, but they're still wildly popular because they didn't do stupid shit like treat the main character like trash to be discarded, while providing high quality and immersive gameplay.

                1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

                  I wouldn't say BG3 has woke "political messaging". It lest you be gay/lesbo, but you can also cut off the annoying red bitch's head and punt it off a cliff. It's gives woke options, but you don't have to pick them if you get my drift.

                  1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

                    I don't know, they really hit you over the head with the whole "you're a bad person if you don't let in refugees" crap that's right out of 2010s media messaging. Plus they had to throw in the "non-binary" character option at the selection screen. And then of course there's two of the main antagonists being white guys.

                    But as I said, that's pretty easy to get past because the overall gameplay is so good.

                2. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

                  You pretty much just need to nail a good gameplay loop, and not fully beat people over the head with unsubtle woke lecturing, and people will play a game.

                  Where people are starting to take huge hits are producing games with mid (at best) gameplay, infused with cancer levels of wokeness, and gamers wont buy that. You have to do at least one element right. You either make gameplay so good the story can be overlooked, or you tone down the story enough to make it at least not annoying.

        2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

          Even the first season was pretty shit in its own right. Hollywood's so far up their own ass with the girlboss trope that it suppressed the unique dynamic of Joel and Ellie's interactions and personalities from the first game to fit within that paradigm. In the game, Joel is someone who has gotten completely locked in to survival mode and is still grieving the loss of his daughter, while Ellie is a typical dumb adolescent who Joel has to teach and mentor so they both survive. She actually makes quite a few dumb decisions and wasn't nearly as much of a smartmouth in the game as they had Ellie be in the first season.

          Season Two was always going to take a dump just like the Last of Us 2, the game, did--because the writer is a wokey moron who isn't nearly as clever as he thinks he is, and because these people have a knack these days for making their villains look like heroes, and their heroes like villains.

          1. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

            "writer is a wokey moron who isn't nearly as clever as he thinks he is"

            Reminds me of Rian fucking Johnson. Everything that lefty fuck writes he thinks is a work of genius, subverting all the expectations, but he really is just a bad writer who isnt 1/10th as smart as he presumes

  25. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

    reopen Alcatraz

    Now we see the real issue, Trump just wants more of America's finest actor, Sean Connery.

    1. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

      YOU'RE THE MAN NOW DOG!

  26. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

    the global expansion of physician-assisted suicide does not feel like moral progress to me:

    Depends on what it looks like, for me. A 60 year old with early Alzeimhers; ok in my book. A government using this this because they can't in fact run a nationalized single payer plan, not ok.

    1. Incunabulum   1 year ago

      Uh, you're already getting the latter - see: Canada and everywhere assisted suicide is done.

  27. Longtobefree   1 year ago

    "Since Alcatraz is an island, getting supplies in and out is expensive; it's unclear how exactly Trump plans to pay for his idea."

    Solar powered drones and windmill powered desalination plants.

    (on cloudy days the prisoners don't eat)

    1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   1 year ago

      Lol. That Bay Area fog is a bitch.

  28. Longtobefree   1 year ago

    " . . . 7,000 unpaid invoices from nonprofits, some dating back years . . . "

    So the first thing is to check how many of those scammers still exist.

    1. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

      No no no. That would be racist.
      We have to just move and say "whoops, mistakes were made" and ignore it.

  29. Longtobefree   1 year ago

    "Hollywood is being destroyed."

    OK, so is there a downside?

    1. mad.casual   1 year ago

      Hollywood is being destroyed.

      By fire or with fire?

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   1 year ago

        Does it matter? Most of it is self inflicted for them.

      2. Super Scary   1 year ago

        With fire or of fire?

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   1 year ago

          Either. Dracarys.

    2. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   1 year ago

      Related news, rust is now in theator

    3. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

      Hollywood has destroyed itself the last decade.

    4. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

      The actual problem being that Hollywood is being destroyed largely by its own hand with incompetent production and writing pandering to the largely nonexistent "modern audience", and suicidal trade unions.

  30. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

    Yesterday, President Donald Trump said he would be imposing 100 percent tariffs on all foreign films. "WE WANT MOVIES MADE IN AMERICA, AGAIN!" declared Trump, who called foreign films a "national security threat" due to their ability to deliver propaganda to U.S. viewers.

    This is just fucking idiotic. He really might be losing it.

    Reminds me the "precious bodily fluids" joke from Dr. Strangelove

    1. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

      Probably syphillis

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   1 year ago

        Nah, that’s more Bill Clinton’s style.

    2. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   1 year ago

      I haven't checked into it yet, but I bet $20 that Trump was trolling reporters again and that this isn't some sort of policy development or EO.

      1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

        It's mostly corporate media guessing what he means as his posts didn't actually have a lot of details. So they make assumptions and push it as his plan.

        https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cjr7e2z1rxyo

        1. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

          That's the usual for sure

  31. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   1 year ago

    ""Since Alcatraz is an island, getting supplies in and out is expensive; it's unclear how exactly Trump plans to pay for his idea.""

    Alcatraz is 1.25 miles off the coast of San Francisco. ADX Florence is 100 miles from Denver.

    This is a Sarcasmic-tier argument.

  32. Longtobefree   1 year ago

    Oh, by the way, Trump does not declare war.

  33. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   1 year ago

    "DOJ opens probe after left-wing DA requires prosecutors to consider race in plea deals"
    [...]
    "The Justice Department has opened a civil rights investigation into the Minneapolis-area Hennepin County Attorney’s Office’s new directive for its prosecutors to consider race when negotiating plea deals with criminal defendants.
    Attorney General Pam Bondi, Acting Associate Attorney General Chad Mizelle and Assistant Attorney General of the Civil Rights Division Harmeet Dhillon informed Hennepin County Attorney Mary Moriarty in a letter that the Justice Department is opening a probe into whether the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office "engaged in a pattern of practice of depriving persons of rights, privileges or immunities secured or protect by the Constitution or laws of the United States."..."
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/doj-opens-probe-after-left-wing-da-requires-prosecutors-to-consider-race-in-plea-deals/ar-AA1E8L6X

    A14 seems to apply here.

    1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

      Chemjeff cries.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        I mean c'mon man! They said they were sorry! And some of them only jacked off!

    2. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

      Where do people today get the idea that this sort of thing is even a good idea?

      1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

        Critical race theory. White savior syndrome. Race based marxism.

        1. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

          What are the traits of race-based Marxism?

          1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

            Whatever physical difference they can use to create an oppressor class to rage against.

            Marxists haven't been quiet about this.

          2. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   1 year ago

            Where’ve you been Mike?

    3. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

      I will not be satisfied until at least one of these bolsheviks is in handcuffs and charged with felonies.

  34. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   1 year ago

    "Cuts halt income research by UCSF"
    [...]
    "Tremon Chandler, a 25-year old from Ohio moved to San Francisco four years ago with $3,000 in his pocket to chase his dream of becoming a rapper. Quickly realizing his savings would not go far in California, he slept in his car and crashed with a coworker before finding housing.
    But life stabilized when Chandler enrolled as a participant in the Black Economic Equity Movement, a clinical trial run by UCSF which aimed to measure the impact of guaranteed income on local Black young adults..."
    https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/trump-nih-cuts-ucsf-study-20301382.php

    1) A14 seems to apply here also, unless I can identify as "young" and "black" and get my share.
    2) I wish I knew people as generous as me.

    1. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

      This is a giant scam on families that are intact with a working breadwinner. The productive class is being bled dry in this country.

  35. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

    60 Minutes interviews cartels members about Trump calling them terrorists.

    https://x.com/DefiyantlyFree/status/1919072952122831107

    They also had Marc Elias on to complain about Trump revoking lawfirm security clearances.

    Can't make this shit up.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   1 year ago

      Marc Elias is probably the least neutral party they could’ve had on. That fucker is behind damn near every fucking lawfare effort against Trump and anyone who’s to the right of Pol Pot.

      1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

        They didn't once mention Elias' past. Who he works for. His 501 group to disbar conservative lawyers. The group working with DAs to generate criminal cases against conservative.

        But please cry for lawyers who abused their clearances.

        1. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

          What woukd we have from the Keft other than their massive hypocrisy.

        2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

          Not to mention his multiple lawsuits trying to institutionalize Democratic ballot stuffing.

          Elias is simply pissed that he and his side are getting about 1/100 of the "liberating tolerance" they've practiced for the last 50 years.

    2. chemjeff radical individualist   1 year ago

      I remember when we were all very concerned around here about the president having the unilateral power to declare certain people to be 'terrorists' and then ship them off to who-knows-where. The concern was that mistakes would inevitably be made and innocent people would suffer as a result. Or that the president would abuse the power and deliberately label certain people as 'terrorists' in order to just get rid of them regardless if they committed any terrorist acts.

      But I guess all of those concerns are behind us, now that we have Daddy Trump who only knows what is best for us and would never make a mistake nor abuse his power. After all, He who saves his Country does not violate any Law.

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   1 year ago

        Fuck off and die, lying pile of lefty shit.

      2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

        When Democrats do it it's bad and when Trump does it it's good. And when Democrats are back in power it will be bad again. See the difference?

        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   1 year ago

          Fuck off and die, lying pile of steaming lefty shit.

        2. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   1 year ago

          Your same old shitty daily strawman?

        3. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   1 year ago

          Poor sarcbot.

        4. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   1 year ago

          "When Democrats do it it's bad and when Trump does it it's good. And when Democrats are back in power it will be bad again. See the difference?"

          How is this different from your insistence that when Democrats do it it's good but when the Democrats turn around and accuse Trump of doing it, then it's bad?

          Sarcasmic is kind of beyond mere hypocrisy here. What would be a word for something more intense and egregious than mere hypocrisy? Maybe we have to invent one?

          Hypocrisynthe, maybe?
          Ultraquity?
          Contravirtuance?
          Ethodoxical Disalignment?
          Virtuocratic Inconsistency?

          Sarcasmic doesn't just practice hypocrisy—but virtuocratic inconsistency at an high level.

          1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

            No matter what word you choose, sarc would use it wrong.

          2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

            "What would be a word for something more intense and egregious than mere hypocrisy? "

            Democrat.

      3. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   1 year ago

        Hey Lying Jeffy, does the president have the authority to revoke a law firm’s security clearance?

  36. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   1 year ago

    "Bay Area arts scene hit by National Endowments for the Arts grant cancellations"
    [...]
    "More than a dozen Bay Area arts nonprofit organizations just had their National Endowment for the Arts grants canceled.
    It is impacting various art organizations, including the Berkeley Repertory Theatre, SF Jazz, and The Lab.
    The Lab is a small art space in the Mission District. Executive Director Andrew Smith said the nonprofit gives opportunities to underrepresented artists, that includes space, time and funding. some of which came from their National Endowment for the Arts grant.
    "It does leave us with an enormous structural gap," said Smith. "It's about 50 percent of the funding for our commissioning program."
    On Friday they had a show, called "FACEBREAK," people smashed plates with photos of tech moguls, like mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk, on them..."
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/bay-area-arts-scene-hit-by-national-endowments-for-the-arts-grant-cancellations/ar-AA1E9FEX

    The last is sort of like Michelangelo stomping on images of The Medici family in Florence; these assholes have no idea that their actions have consequences, including taking their 'allowances' away.
    Wanna know if you're an artist? Does your art pay your bills?
    If not, you're a hobbyist and I'm not giving you a penny.

    1. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

      The pool of tears can be considered performance art, so in a way we're still funding these losers.

  37. Incunabulum   1 year ago

    >It's also difficult to suss out what exactly "foreign" means in this contex

    It means we're about to get the American version of Bob and Doug McKenzie.

    1. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   1 year ago

      More Escanaba in da Moonlights?

    2. Dillinger   1 year ago

      beauty, eh?

    3. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      I think we basically got that 35 years ago with Wayne and Garth.

      1. D-Pizzle   1 year ago

        I've got some bad news about Mike Myers...

  38. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

    So are we to understand that the "utterly bleak prospect for the future of assisted dying" is that doctors would not be compelled to kill people if they have a moral objection?

    The utter inanity of positive rights.

  39. SRG2   1 year ago

    I note the absence of cultist criticism of the preposterous justification for the film tariffs - that it's a national security issue.

    But of course, criticism of Dear Leader is streng verboten

    1. Dillinger   1 year ago

      the Simpsons mocked Hollywood for chasing cheap film locations in maybe 1997 ... about same time Hollywood died ... what's left to say?

      1. SRG2   1 year ago

        Is it the government's role to tell Hollywood what to do?

        1. Dillinger   1 year ago

          if the president takes it upon himself to bring light to a dying industry he likes by simply mentioning it more power to him

          1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   1 year ago

            Trump had an opinion!!!
            That's just like Hitler!

        2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   1 year ago

          When you complain as much about government subsidies of Hollywood as you do the tariffs I'll take you seriously. Well. Probably not.

    2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      I note the absence of cultist criticism of the preposterous justification for the film tariffs - that it's a national security issue.

      Probably because, unlike Trump, most of us don't give a shit if Hollywood dies like the cultural cancer that it is.

    3. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      Here's mine: if Trump is serious about this (and since he has a habit of just saying shit meant to troll the media, it's hard to tell sometimes), it's just plain stupid.

      Similarly, re-opening Alcatraz, while symbolically perhaps a useful anti-crime tool, is likely to be a boondoggle of immense proportions.

  40. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>Yesterday, President Donald Trump said he would be imposing 100 percent tariffs on all foreign films.

    it was criminal Jumpstreet and Booker were made in Vancouver 35 years ago

  41. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>New York ... is sitting on at least 7,000 unpaid invoices from nonprofits, some dating back years, totaling over $1 billion

    always a delicious turn when the mob I mean government has a collection problem.

  42. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>A good read from Reason's Eric Boehm

    who's the author?

  43. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>the 11th U.S. state to permit legalized suicide for certain patients.

    state-sponsored killing please use the correct words.

    1. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

      Not that I have a problem with sex offenders getting help in offing themselves...

      1. Dillinger   1 year ago

        we can have outlawing for that.

  44. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>the global expansion of physician-assisted suicide does not feel like moral progress to me

    no no! total progress. just like cancer progresses.

  45. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

    The Central American news outlet El Faro recently released footage of "leaders of the 18th Street Revolucionarios gang who not only cut deals for years with the entourage of [President] Nayib Bukele, but also escaped the country with the complicity of his government" and who revealed "details about the agreements that permitted Bukele's ascent to total power."

    I wonder if El Faro has been equally diligent into digging in to how Claudia Sheinbaum became President of Mexico after the cartels exterminated over 30 potential candidates.

    1. Fats of Fury   1 year ago

      I wonder if it's The Central Intelligence American news outlet El Faro?

  46. Marshal   1 year ago

    declared Trump, who called foreign films a "national security threat" due to their ability to deliver propaganda to U.S. viewers.

    It's unlikely any foreign film industry is as anti-American as Hollywood.

    1. Eeyore   1 year ago

      This

  47. Eeyore   1 year ago

    Looks like the new Snow White was going to film some of the movie in California, but in 2022 California was still playing pandemic, so they said fuck it and filmed elsewhere. Even people who make shitty movies know to avoid California.

    Admit it, regulations and unions are destroying film production in the states.

    The same people are destroying video game development in the state of California.

    1. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

      I thought that entire movie was CGI. Are you telling me Rachel Zegler is not a CGI creation?

      1. Eeyore   1 year ago

        I am disappointed that is didn't feature 7 Portland hipsters. I think only the dwarves were cgi.

        1. Fats of Fury   1 year ago

          They did, before the public screamed them down.

    2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      The UK provides Hollywood with massive tax breaks to film there. That was mainly why Snow White did most of its filming, not COVID policy.

      That's also the reason a bunch of these commie actors were pushing to get studios out of Georgia over the fake "voter suppression" lie when all the hand-wringing over Fentanyl Floyd was still going on. If you see a movie or TV show with a lot of forests and greenery, it was likely filmed in Georgia over the last decade or so.

  48. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

    the global expansion of physician-assisted suicide does not feel like moral progress to me

    It's problematic when the physician is a government employee.

  49. AT   1 year ago

    I am absolutely willing to pay twice - no, three or four times - than I already am for foreign films.

    What's twice, thrice, four times zero, again?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's Responses to Kimmel and Comey Highlight His Contempt for Freedom of Speech

Jacob Sullum | 5.6.2026 12:01 AM

Elizabeth Warren Wrongly Implies Jeff Bezos Isn't Paying Enough Taxes

Robby Soave | 5.5.2026 5:40 PM

The People vs. CEQA

Christian Britschgi | 5.5.2026 3:25 PM

How the Slaveholding Founders Really Felt About Slavery

Timothy Sandefur | 5.5.2026 1:20 PM

Can We Ever Trust the Government To Be Honest About War?

Alexander Langlois | 5.5.2026 12:27 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks