A Guilty Plea Implicates 'Almost the Entire' Albuquerque DWI Unit in Longstanding Police Corruption
Federal prosecutors say the city's police department was the main focus of a 15-year bribery scheme that also involved the sheriff's office and the state police.

From 2008 to through 2023, federal prosecutors in New Mexico say, Albuquerque police officers conspired with a local defense attorney, Thomas Clear, and his investigator, Ricardo Mendez, to make DWI cases disappear in exchange for bribes. Mendez pleaded guilty on Friday to eight federal charges in connection with the long-running scheme, which prosecutors say mainly involved officers assigned to the Albuquerque Police Department's DWI unit but also included employees of the Bernalillo County Sheriff's Office (BCSO) and the New Mexico State Police (NMSP).
The details of this massive corruption scandal have been slowly emerging since January 2024, when FBI agents searched Clear's office. The federal investigation of the Albuquerque Police Department (APD), which also involved searches of officers' homes, resulted in the dismissal of some 200 DWI cases and an internal probe. So far, the Santa Fe New Mexican reports, "at least a dozen Albuquerque police officers have been placed on leave," and many of them have dodged interviews with internal investigators by resigning. But Mendez's guilty plea is the first public confirmation of criminal charges in the case, and it reveals more extensive corruption than the initial press reports suggested.
According to the charges against Mendez, which include racketeering, bribery, and "interference with commerce by extortion," he and his boss, Clear, had a mutually beneficial arrangement with Albuquerque cops who specialized in nabbing drunk drivers. The officers would generate business for Clear by referring arrestees to his office. Those clients, who typically paid Clear in cash, were amazed and delighted at his ability to make their cases go away, sparing them prosecution and revocation of their driver's licenses. But federal prosecutors say that impressive track record was not due to Clear's legal skills so much as his payoffs to the cops, who conveniently failed to show up at pretrial interviews or court hearings, allowing the aptly named Clear to seek dismissal of the charges on the grounds that the crucial witnesses against his clients were absent.
Initially, those no-shows involved pretrial interviews (PTIs) of witnesses that defendants were entitled to arrange. After March 24, 2022, when the New Mexico Supreme Court suspended PTIs for cases filed in Bernalillo County Municipal Court, the must-miss events were motion hearings and trials. As a reward for their poor attendance record, prosecutors say, officers "were often paid in cash but, at times, also received other benefits and things of value," including "free legal services, gift cards, hotel rooms, and other gifts."
According to prosecutors, Albuquerque officers sometimes would, contrary to department policy, refrain from charging DWI suspects and instead provide their contact information or their driver's licenses to Mendez. Those drivers "were asked to pay several thousand dollars in U.S. currency in exchange for the APD officer not filing charges against the DWI Offenders."
To preserve and expand this "DWI Enterprise," prosecutors say, Albuquerque officers "who had worked in the DWI unit and were part of the scheme helped recruit and train
the next generation" of corrupt cops. The more experienced officers would introduce the recruits to Mendez and give him their cell phone numbers, which "in recent years" earned them a "referral fee." They also helped Mendez by telling him "which officers the DWI Enterprise should avoid"—"meaning which officers were likely to report the DWI Enterprise's criminal activity to internal affairs or other law enforcement authorities."
When meeting with a new recruit, Mendez "often discussed many of the other Officers Members who had been and were part of the DWI Enterprise from the different law enforcement agencies (APD, NMSP, and BCSO)," which "allowed the recruit to feel more comfortable joining the DWI Enterprise because of the number of senior, and often high-ranking, officers" who were already involved in it, prosecutors say. "This generational participation, particularly within APD, allowed the DWI Enterprise to take root amongst almost the entire APD DWI unit over a lengthy period of time."
That description confirms what Joshua Montaño, one of the Albuquerque officers who was placed on administrative leave, said when he resigned in March 2024. "The issues I let myself get caught up in within the DWI Unit were generational," he wrote in a letter to Police Reform Superintendent Eric Garcia. Montaño complained that he had been made "the City's scapegoat for its own failures" and that Albuquerque Police Chief Harold Medina "has made it seem like there are just a few bad officers acting on their own," which was "far from the truth."
Medina had promised to "make sure that we get to the bottom of this," a commitment that he reiterated on Friday. "As I've said many times over the past year, we will leave no stone unturned when it comes to exposing this conspiracy," he said. "We have fully cooperated with the FBI's investigation, while aggressively pursuing our own internal investigation that produced immediate results and helped us identify changes we needed to make to ensure accountability within the department. Through our investigation, we believe this conspiracy goes back as far as two decades, which the U.S. Attorney indicated in its plea agreement today. It is disappointing on so many levels because it appears police officers from several agencies conspired with at least two lawyers and a paralegal to manipulate the criminal justice system, at the expense of victims of DWI."
Medina's commitment to transparency seems doubtful in light of his own personal scandal. Last February, he ran a red light and slammed his department-issued pickup truck into the side of a sports car, severely injuring the driver. Medina, who said he was fleeing from a fight between two homeless men that had escalated into gunfire, blamed "gun violence" for his reckless driving, which eventually resulted in two official reprimands. One of those reprimands involved operating his truck "in an unsafe manner." The other involved his failure to activate his body camera, as required by department policy and state law, while he was talking to witnesses after the crash.
Medina bizarrely defended that decision by claiming "spousal privilege," saying the camera might have recorded his exchanges with his wife, who was riding with him in the truck. More alarmingly, he claimed he had a Fifth Amendment right to avoid incriminating himself by recording his interactions with the public—a position that would give cops a license to keep their cameras off in any situation where their conduct might look bad. Needless to say, that legal theory is inconsistent with the main rationale for requiring body cameras in the first place.
Medina's credibility is also open to question in light of his avowed obliviousness to what was happening in the DWI unit. Medina, who began working for the APD in 1995, was an APD officer for 20 years before retiring as a commander in 2014, six years after prosecutors say the "DWI Enterprise" got started. After a few years as police chief of Laguna, New Mexico, Medina returned to the APD as deputy chief in December 2017. Three years later, he became interim chief, a position that was made permanent in March 2021. All told, Medina's tenure at the APD overlapped with the DWI unit's corruption for more than a decade. Yet he apparently had no clue about it until the FBI briefed him on its investigation.
Worse, the APD received a tip about the bribery scheme in December 2022. The tipster specifically mentioned Honorio Alba, one of the officers who would later resign amid the corruption scandal. An internal investigation by Acting Sgt. Jon O'Guin found no evidence to substantiate the tip. If O'Guin had looked more closely at DWI cases, he might have noticed the same curious pattern of dismissals that federal prosecutors described last week.
Prosecutors say the APD was the main locus of corruption. But the federal investigation also implicated the sheriff's office and the state police.
"Upon learning of the involvement of BCSO personnel, the deputy in question"—Jeff Hammerel—"was immediately placed on administrative leave last night," BCSO spokeswoman Jayme Fuller-Gonzales said on Friday. "Sheriff [John] Allen has consistently demonstrated zero tolerance for misconduct, particularly corruption, and remains committed to upholding the highest standards of integrity within the Sheriff's Office."
The NMSP, by contrast, still seems unsure why it was mentioned in the charges against Mendez. "At this time, we do not have information to believe any of our officers were involved in this criminal conduct," NMSP spokesman Ricardo Brecedo said on Friday. "The New Mexico State Police has been and will continue to cooperate with investigators."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
JS;dr
Cops sure love scamming people.
I'm noticing more and more recent photos of police cars not sporting the ancient motto "To Protect and To Serve". The cases of DeShaney v. Winnebago County and Castle Rock v. Gonzales established that the police have no constitutional duty to protect people from other people. Hence the police have chosen time and again to protect each other from the effects of laws the F.O.P. perceives as threats to their safety or authority.
I'm not sure what "To Serve" ever meant in practice, regardless of what this motto was intended to mean. As in this case what we see is yet more law enforcement personnel serving the interests (usually financial) of others. When schemes like this one are discovered, it seems that resignation is the worst punishment the LE personnel need worry about. It also seems to me that more often than not such disgraced officers will soon find employment in some other LE agency. I guess I can understand why police officers are especially fearful of jail and prison time, but they shouldn't be able to wriggle out of complaints and charges that would send you or me to the slammer.
They serve the public who is everyone else.
I'm noticing more and more recent photos of police cars not sporting the ancient motto "To Protect and To Serve".
Are you referring to a particular photo that's not associated with this article or do you not see police cars in real life.
Note: This is not a question.
The Good Guise.
ACAB
Well, this rather large conspiracy of corrupt cops seems to be comprised of complete bastards.
I’d love to see some of the ones who took a payoff on a driver that later killed someone driving drunk get charged for some sort of conspiracy or manslaughter charge.
Lawyers, would such charges be possible for a cop who helped a repeat drunk driver remain on the road?
And we really should look into the APD's cooperation with Los Pollos Hermanos. There's something sketchy about that chicken place.
The incentives are marvelous. No wonder it took 15 years for someone to finally pay attention.
I know a few people who have gotten everything whitewashed with an expensive lawyer. I have no doubt that some of that money ended up in police hands.
Ahhh, my home town. *sigh*
Just mad they Judges got cut out of the loop.
Traffic law basically works by traffic lawyers donating money to judges for their election campaigns and judges in turn give traffic lawyers good deals for their clients.
Most reasonable judges would let slide an occasional dismissal from a no-show cop with a good excuse. A normal human would at least be considered for contempt. A pattern of no-shows from anyone would piss off most judges. I don't see how the judges were not in on it.
Albuquerque police officers conspired with a local defense attorney, Thomas Clear, and his investigator, Ricardo Mendez, to make DWI cases disappear in exchange for bribes.
Actually, by your own admission, it's more that Thomas Clear conspired with Albuquerque police officers. Meaning he was the instigator and ringleader of the conspiracy.
You wrote it the other way around on purpose to make it seem more ACAB-y.
Yea, obviously the cops should have said no. But this was pretty obviously Clear's racket, and not the cops'.
And it's not like the cops were out there falsely charging people with DWI - the arrests and charges were legitimate, clearly enough, and a prosecutor likely could have convicted on them but for the cops sabotaging the prosecutor's case in return for a bribe by Clear.
10:1 says Clear is a billboard attorney. And probably has (or, had) cheesy television commercials. Any Albie's want to confirm/deny?
You wrote it the other way around on purpose to make it seem more ACAB-y.
Also of note: For all the "As likely to be shot by a police officer as anyone else, better off without them." the only place this assertion was conspicuously true was Albuquerque. Everywhere else, civilian shootings and homicides routinely exceed police shootings by more than an order of magnitude and/or shootings/killings of any type are so rare as to be spurious.
There's certainly a case to be had that the police aren't/weren't reporting their shootings, but that doesn't prove the assertion, it just tosses out all the data and/or implies the Albuquerque cops were being exceptionally honest, owning up to their shootings/misconduct.
"And it's not like the cops were out there falsely charging people with DWI - the arrests and charges were legitimate..."
Everyone needs to read this again. If the good guise are ripping off the bad guys, its good. It doesn't make the good guise bad, because they are good.
Oh and in most states DWI is a misdemeanor, so remember that if you piss on the corner of a building, or jaywalk, to AT you are a Bad Guy. Any interaction with a cop, no matter how minor, carries with it a potential death sentence.
Comply.
If the good guise are ripping off the bad guys, its good.
I didn't say it was good. I said that the crime was for which they arrested was still a crime.
so remember that if you piss on the corner of a building, or jaywalk
Also, please just do America a favor and leave civilized society if you're the kind of person that does such things.
Any interaction with a cop, no matter how minor, carries with it a potential death sentence.
"Beep boop boop," says the ACAB NPC.
"Beep boop boop," says the ACAB NPC.
Your projection carries no sting.
ACAB.
All cops aren’t bastards, but the good ones are definitely fighting a losing battle against the bad ones and their police union protectors. It’s like the Catholic Church, but for corruption instead of pedophilia.
Nor your programming any merit.
Also, leftists like you don't know how to use the term "projection" - and look foolish every time you do. You don't even have a reason why you think I'm wrong. Just some mindless, "Why do you care if we're peeing on buildings." That's how far removed the left is from anything resembling civilization. Or reality. In order for it to make sense in your head, you have to rationalize that as somehow OK. Insanity.
Just.... just get out, UTS. Get out of this country and don't come back. Go pee on buildings with the rest of the third world. You're not wanted here. By anyone.
Actually, it was more the "You jaywalking is a SERIOUS CRIME!!! that made you, well, not be worth taking seriously. Well, OK, Along with all of the other copsucking comments over the last however long. Those are definitely a factor.
I mean, you definitely have some good points on occasion, but tongue laving the police is not one of them.
"You jaywalking is a SERIOUS CRIME!!!
You'll have to point that out to me, because I don't recall saying any such thing.
Y'know, I once heard a great analogy for society. It's called the Shopping Cart Theory. Simply put: you can judge a society based on its grocery store parking lots. A good society has all the carts and trolleys lined up neatly at the front of the store, or corralled in the various returns out in the parking lot. A crappy society has them in the middle of parking spaces, propped up on curbs/islands, or left abandoned in the cross line between four parking spots.
The theory was simple. Returning your grocery cart to the store or corral is an act that takes minimal effort, offers no reward or thanks, carries no enforcement or consequence if you don't, the failure to do so harms no one, and only ones sense of self-governance and civic responsibility/social virtue compel the action.
The theory is aimed at the individual - you can tell a lot about a person by what they do when they're done with their shopping cart. But it can also be expanded socially as well - as evidenced by the overall state of the parking lot as a whole.
The same principle effectively applies to jaywalking. Or peeing on a building. I mean, if you can't be bothered with something so simple.... do you really have a legitimate place here with the rest of civilized society? Should you?
Or are you better suited for the less civilized third-world societies like Mumbai or San Francisco or Nairobi?
You'll notice, when you go back and reread it - that's precisely what I said. Not "serious crime," but civilized society. I get that the ACAB is overriding the rationality, but at least quote me accurately when you're going to claim to do so.
Oh good lord, you fucking drama queen.
Language.
Language.
Is mutable.
Except he does actually get or call out the causality correctly and does so in a manner that does/would actually address the problem rather than the typical Reason MO of calling out the lowest level and/or least responsible endlessly so that they can keep the readership thinking on a 1-dimensional level and keep the clickbait flowing.
Actual libertarians routinely say "One bad apple spoils the whole cart." but as is frequently pointed out, judges and DAs are involved as well and, in such situations, no matter how good or ripe the fruit, it's a poisoned tree, cart, whatever.
But then that gets into the CJ Ciaramella's "I think we should fire all the Sheriffs in team red counties because I don't like team red's politics." hackneyed political propaganda.
Except he does actually get or call out the causality correctly
Maybe.
But I think is a blind squirrel thing. While employing mental and rhetorical gymnastics to defend the Good Guise and recast victims into skells, AT finds a nut.
Forgive me if I don't applaud. At least here on the internet when you piss-off a cop people don't die.
They're not victims. They're accused criminals who likely knew they'd be found guilty and took a lifeline. Albeit a corrupt one that served a corrupt attorney, but a lifeline all the same.
If anything, they were benefitted by this scam just as much as everyone else - they just didn't know it. They got to keep driver's licenses, stay out of jail, and probably avoid even larger statutory fines. Pretty sweet deal for everyone involved, actually. Except the State, who was deprived of its rightful ability to serve Justice.
"Actually, by your own admission, it's more that Thomas Clear conspired with Albuquerque police officers. Meaning he was the instigator and ringleader of the conspiracy.”
So the cops are innocent and shouldn’t be prosecuted? Who cares about nitpicky nonsense like that in a corruption case this egregious?
“ Yea, obviously the cops should have said no. But this was pretty obviously Clear's racket, and not the cops'.”
Did you miss the part about the cops creating a training program (complete with alumni) to continually recruit new cops into the corruption? That was all them.
“ And it's not like the cops were out there falsely charging people with DWI”
No, it was worse. It was helping drunk drivers stay on the road so the could drive drunk again. But I guess in your world a few innocent dead people here or there is fine if we can protect corrupt cops from prosecution.
Corrupt cops should always be prosecuted more vigorously than other criminals perpetrating the same crime, since they add betrayal of their fellow officers and the public on top of whatever crime they committed.
So the cops are innocent and shouldn’t be prosecuted?
Did I say that? No. In fact, you straight up quoted me saying "the cops should have said no." They didn't. They were just as complicit in the conspiracy as the attorney. All I said is they weren't the instigators of this scam.
This article tries to make it out like the cops were scammers. They weren't. They were legitimately arresting people who allegedly committed legitimate crimes. They were then offered bribes, which they wrongfully and illegally accepted, to sabotage prosecution of those crimes in a way that benefitted this attorney.
The attorney was the one who came up and offered this scheme. Not them.
Who cares about nitpicky nonsense like that in a corruption case this egregious?
The Court.
Did you miss the part about the cops creating a training program (complete with alumni) to continually recruit new cops into the corruption? That was all them.
Yea, I imagine the conversations went something like, "Hey, you want to make a little side action? I know this guy..."
But see, the guy had to exist before the cops could tell rookies about him, didn't he.
No, it was worse. It was helping drunk drivers stay on the road so the could drive drunk again.
Pssh, that happens with most DUI/DWI prosecutions anyway. The consequences are enough for those who aren't inclined to do it in the first place, but for the recidivists? We don't start meaningfully taking them off the streets until they level up to Repeat Offender.
Corrupt cops should always be prosecuted more vigorously than other criminals perpetrating the same crime, since they add betrayal of their fellow officers and the public on top of whatever crime they committed.
I'd take that more seriously from folks like you if you said it about folks with political power.
But, you don't. So, ¯\(ツ)/¯
“ quoted me saying "the cops should have said no."”
That’s the apologist version of “damned by faint praise”. These weren’t good and decent cops led astray by a nefarious lawyer. These were corrupt cios who actively and intentionally created a culture of corruption within the police department. Are you going to whine about how they have families that they have to feed, too?
“ The attorney was the one who came up and offered this scheme. Not them.”
That makes no difference to how awful they are or how much prison time they should serve. Especially since the attorney had nothing to do with the recruiting of new officers into their corrupt scheme. That was all on the dirty cops.
“ The Court.”
What? You think the court cares that the cops conspired with a lawyer to behave corruptly instead of instigating it on their own? That’s like saying that a hired killer isn’t really so bad because someone hired them. Conspiracy is conspiracy and corruption is corruption. These cops, just like a disgusting and disturbing number of their fellow officers, are corrupt from their head to their toes.
“ Pssh, that happens with most DUI/DWI prosecutions anyway.”
Wow, that’s Olympic-level handwaving. “Sure, the drunk driver that I corruptly helped escape prosecution went on to kill an entire family, but that would have happened anyway so there’s nothing to see here.”.
“ I'd take that more seriously from folks like you if you said it about folks with political power.
But, you don't. So, ¯\(ツ)/¯”
Except, of course, I do. However, with your blame shifting, your handwaving, and now your whataboutism, you have completed the rare trifecta of bad faith arguments in a single post. Congratulations, you’ve earned the Shill of the Week award.
These weren’t good and decent cops led astray by a nefarious lawyer. These were corrupt cios who actively and intentionally created a culture of corruption within the police department.
I didn't say they were. I said that they weren't the originators/instigators of this bribery scheme.
They were OFFERED the bribes, Nelson. Not soliciting them.
That makes no difference to how awful they are or how much prison time they should serve.
I didn't say a single word about how much prison time they should receive. My point was about the deliberate and misleading nature of the article and the agenda behind its narrative.
Especially since the attorney had nothing to do with the recruiting of new officers into their corrupt scheme.
Suppose the attorney had died. That's it. Scheme's gone.
Again, you're trying to press an ACAB narrative because some bad cops took bribes. Like Jakey, you're trying to place the majority of the scandal on the cops - when in reality it belongs with the attorney.
It'd be no different than if it were a room full of frat boys with a drug peddler offering a high. All the frat boys may partake in it - and, like the cops, they shouldn't be doing that - but it's the drug peddler that makes it all possible in the first place. He is the top of the ladder here, and the primary figure in this scandal.
That’s like saying that a hired killer isn’t really so bad because someone hired them.
Would the killer have a target but for the person who issued the hit? Which takes more malice and intent and mens rea?
These cops, just like a disgusting and disturbing number of their fellow officers, are corrupt from their head to their toes.
And I never said they weren't. Just that they weren't the basis for the corruption scandal. They were the ones who were corrupted, by the kingpin in this whole scheme - Clear.
Wow, that’s Olympic-level handwaving. “Sure, the drunk driver that I corruptly helped escape prosecution went on to kill an entire family, but that would have happened anyway so there’s nothing to see here.”.
Then don't try and make fallacious emotional/outrage appeals by pretending even for a second that you give one flying fig about "drunk drivers on the road."
You came to that desperate claim when I pointed out the fact that all these people that Clear bribed cops to scam were, in fact, legitimately accused of and charged with criminal DWI. And if these cops were instead cracking down SO HARD on these guys, going after them without an ounce of restraint and making sure they show up at EVERY hearing to make sure those drunk driving punks do some REAL jail time - you'd be complaining about that too.
When you falsely assert that yours is a position derived from, lmao, a desire for public safety - you are being obviously disingenuous. It's a brazen fallacy, and serves only to further your ACAB narrative.
But you know what? Correct me if I'm wrong right here and now: if you're so concerned about tell me that you're 100% in full support of cops cracking down, arresting, and the Courts throwing the book at drunk drivers, recreational drug users creating public dangers, and the like. Rounded up, off the streets, hard time, bankrupted, and with the jailhouse stigma for the rest of their lives.
Would you support the cops in that endeavor? Or were you being disingenuous when you fell to your fainting couch about drunk drivers "staying on the road" because of this scandal?
Except, of course, I do.
No you don't.
And it's not whataboutism. It's about calling you out on being disingenuous in your argument here, in order to rationalize the ACAB narrative you've taken that misplaces the central blame in all this the exact same way Jakey Jakey News Is Fakey did.
Another Reason article reviewing two books about Constitutional Sheriffs touches on this issue. It would have been interesting to read something here about what law grants authority to Federal law enforcement agencies to investigate local political corruption. At least some of the "brickbats" reported by Reason have been about Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation overreach, violation of the terms of their search warrants and prosecutorial abuse while also demonstrating Federal checks on local abuses. Very interesting!
Those clients, who typically paid Clear in cash, were amazed and delighted at his ability to make their cases go away...
Local government's DWI/DUI scam being thwarted by this scam? Albuquerque police have bigger issues the feds need to address.
Good stuff! Now if we could just crack the corruption in Congress.
You’d have more luck getting a pegasus and a money tree.
We in New Mexico are intimately familiar with the long and storied history of APD's murderous corruption and history of car theft. Other cities are little better, in Las Cruces, cops gunned down a 75 year old woman with dementia (yes, they were fully aware of this) in her own kitchen. No consequences whatsoever to the murderer, although we taxpayers shelled out $1.25 million within weeks of the murder. The city and their insurance company knew there was no defense, but the SCOTUS gave the officer a free pass, not his first.