Glasses Equipped with Facial Recognition Are in Our Future
Two Harvard undergrads give us a glimpse of the surveillance future.

Most discussions of facial recognition technology contemplate a world in which people walk the streets and drive the roads under the watchful eyes of government surveillance cameras. Those cameras will tag and track those who fail to hide their features, recording their movements for future reference.
But what if one day facial recognition tech becomes so cheap and portable that it can be built into wearable devices? You wouldn't know if somebody calling your name at a bar was an old friend or a con artist working a scam after linking your face to searchable online personal information. That day is now, courtesy of two Harvard University undergrads.
You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.
These Glasses Can See Into Your Life
Creators AnhPhu Nguyen and Caine Ardayfio, two Harvard students with undoubtedly impressive careers ahead of them, introduced what they call I-XRAY with a video on Instagram (also on X) of the two taking turns walking around Harvard's campus and the streets of Cambridge, Massachusetts. They shared information drawn from the internet about people they meet, based on identification by facial features. In two cases, the subjects aren't aware of the experiment and the inventors engage them in casual conversation as if they were past acquaintances.
"To use it, you just put the glasses on, then as you walk by people the glasses will detect when somebody's face is in frame," Ardayfio says in a voice-over. "This photo is used to analyze them, and after a few seconds their personal information pops up on your phone."
"The information our tool collects from just a photo of your face is staggering," he adds.
The tool is partially a pairing of hacked Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses and the PimEyes face search engine among what the duo describe as "five established technologies." The glasses have built-in cameras, speakers, microphones, and AI capability, and link with phones via Bluetooth. They also give you a classic Buddy Holly look, if you're style-conscious. The glasses can live-stream directly to Instagram and Facebook, which is important for facial-recognition use.
"We stream the video from the glasses straight to Instagram and have a computer program monitor the stream," details Nguyen. "We use AI to detect when we're looking at someone's face, then we scour the internet to find more pictures of that person. Finally, we use data sources like online articles and voter registration databases to figure out their name, phone number, home address, and relatives' names and it's all fed back to an app we wrote on our phone."
Combining Creativity With Off-the-Shelf Technology
What's amazing is that Ardayfio and Nguyen basically contributed code to connect off-the-shelf consumer technology. Their work didn't require cutting-edge hardware or a controversial law-enforcement-only facial recognition service. They used a $300 pair of smart Ray-Bans and a search engine that costs 30 bucks a month for a basic subscription. Ray-Ban advertises the glasses as "the latest in wearable tech with authentic Ray-Ban design, to keep you connected wherever you go." The New York Times reviewed PimEyes as "alarmingly accurate" and capable of matching people with photos from across the internet. Brought together by young innovators, they prove a powerful combination.
Not that the companies in question are entirely thrilled about the free advertising.
"They have not only demonstrated their point but also unintentionally provided a blueprint for malicious individuals on how to weaponize readily available tools," Giorgi Gobronidze, director of PimEyes, cautioned Biometric Update.
Well, malicious individuals were probably going to figure this one out, anyway. They may have already done so, without bothering to publish the results. You don't head off technological threats by concealing them; you have to accept their existence and respond appropriately.
PimEyes is working on preventing its service from being used this way again. But it's obvious the cat is out of the bag. If two undergrads can craft wearable facial-recognition technology using consumer products and services, what are high-tech researchers with contracts from government security agencies up to? And what will it mean for privacy to live in a world in which accessories worn by cops, spies, terrorists, and anybody with an interest might be the eyes and ears of a surveillance network?
The Electronic Frontier Foundation maintains an Atlas of Surveillance that lets users search for surveillance technology in use by law enforcement agencies in specific communities or along travel routes. It's a fascinating and helpful tool, but one that will be a challenge to keep current as prying eyes and ears become cheaper, more portable, and ubiquitous. The same can be said of the organization's Surveillance Self-Defense Guide, which doesn't yet contemplate a world in which every chance encounter on the street, or each glimpse by a stranger, might record our whereabouts.
Battling Surveillance When It's Everywhere
"As cities become ever more packed with cameras that always see, public anonymity could disappear," John Seabrook wrote in 2020 for The New Yorker. "Can stealth streetwear evade electronic eyes?"
For the piece, he interviewed privacy activists who create clothing that confuses surveillance cameras or even feeds garbage data into their systems to baffle their algorithms.
Interest in anti-surveillance technology has continued since then. Last year, in Vice, Jason Koebler described a high-tech hoodie that actively blinds cameras with built-in infrared LEDs. The garment's developer had previously created a cap designed to confuse surveillance with bogus faces.
In a world of surveillance, we may be entering an arms race between wearable surveillance tools and opposing privacy-protecting fashion.
But most people aren't so surveillance-averse that they'll redesign their wardrobes around shielding their identities and their movements. The most concerned among us might take to wearing infrared-strobing caps and cloaks to defeat the all-seeing eyes of those around us. But it's difficult to imagine the majority of the population going to that level of trouble.
As for legal protections against building surveillance tech into every device imaginable, it's easy enough to foresee it getting passed in some form, and then enforced against clever undergraduates and freelance hackers. But assurances by the powers that be that they're acting with restraint will always be awaiting the next Edward Snowden to tell us just how hollow they are.
Nguyen and Ardayfio may have introduced us to a world in which we'll all soon be living.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It’s okay.
People wearing body cameras connected to the cloud can record their personal memories everywhere they go.
In theory hundreds of observations used together by AI could track criminals through their getaway to their hideouts.
Anyone lying would be recorded for all time.
We just need the constitution updated to have the inalienable right to use them , if we want to, everywhere we go and that the records of our memories are also our personal, private property that cannot be taken from us without our permission..
Wear glasses with tiny LEDs. It currently glares out the cameras from capturing your facial image.
That’s a brilliant idea.
Like pointing lasers at aircraft
This guy doesn’t get it.
The next thing will be wearable LED patterns for your face.
Another trick: facial recognition algorithms rely on the dark band created by the eyes. Some research showed that wearing white glasses with white lenses defeats the algorithms.
Sounds racist.
Or just beat up all the hipsters and nerds.
That could be quite a spectacle.
Red warned us.
The author David Brin in his 1990 Sci-Fi book "Earth" predicted these calling them True-Vu googles. The best I recall they were primarily worn by old people being scolds.
"They have ... provided a blueprint for malicious individuals on how to weaponize readily available tools."
Obviously the solution is to ban Ray-Bans and the internet.
Also, get ready for burqas to become stylish.
While I don't especially like this, there's really no way to stop it without restricting people's freedoms in ways I think I'd like even less. So I guess we'd better get used to this being out there.
In a way, it brings us back to past eras where you basically knew everyone in your town or community. I guess this makes the whole country (or the whole "first world") one "community".
It's actually oxymoronic or paradoxical.
Your face and name was never really private. In the "friend or conman" hypothetical, the glasses and facial recognition are immaterial. The person somehow already knows your name and what bars you frequent without the facial recognition confirming it's you for them. In order for the face recognition to work everywhere you already have to be somehow locally or generally notable in the facial recognition database they're working with.
As Reason frequently points out, you can expend massive amounts of effort building and maintaining a database of every address and every resident in the country and blindly reference it when kicking in the doors to the wrong house when executing a warrant, or you can do 30 min. of investigative work to discover whether you've got the right person/house.
People who physically issue court summons jobs have been eased slightly.
Why tho?
How does this differ from Reason's support of License Plate scanners that track your movement... "if done right"?
I need this to help with my facial agnosia.
I can appreciate the concern with this. But at the same time, let's not discount all the positives.
One thing folks like to whine about is the great question of how we round up millions of illegal aliens. This would certainly help. As the glasses proliferate and more people start using them, we start feeding data on criminals into them such that when the average person spots them, it sends up a red flare to ICE or the nearest LEOs. It doesn't even have to alert the user, it can just happen in the background. Same goes for preventing sexual assault. It's not perfect, but if you wake up roofied and violated after a night out at the club, you'll have a nice record of the evening and everyone you came into contact with - or left with. (Of course, the flipside is true too and there would probably be an increase in stalking.) Another good use might be in getting realtime data on drug addicts and derelicts camping out on the streets. Name them, ID them, see if any family can be found willing to claim them, and so forth. Might help.
I'm just saying, there's no need to be a negative nancy or a debbie downer on the whole thing. Privacy's essentially gone guys, and without Snake Plisskin entering the world code, it's not coming back any time soon. May as well just make the best of it. And start getting smarter about how you vote, so that the worst people don't get elected to abuse it.