Congress Passes Bill Backing 'Self-Care' for People Pursuing Prostitution Stings
The IMPACTT Human Trafficking Act would provide outreach and training to Homeland Security Investigations staff.

Both houses of Congress have approved the IMPACTT Human Trafficking Act (S.670) and it's now awaiting President Joe Biden's signature. The bill would provide "self-care" services to Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) staff exposed to victims of human trafficking.
On its face, there's nothing wrong with providing additional psychological support for federal agents who work with trafficking survivors. But HSI—a division of Immigration and Customs Enforcement—has quite a questionable record when it comes to "helping" trafficking victims. At times, HSI has been known to subject suspected victims to potentially traumatizing experiences. And much of the "human trafficking" work the agency does just involves plain old prostitution stings.
You are reading Sex & Tech, from Elizabeth Nolan Brown. Get more of Elizabeth's sex, tech, bodily autonomy, law, and online culture coverage.
HSI's Human Trafficking 'Help'
Check the fine print on state and local cops' sex sting excursions and you'll frequently see HSI listed as a partner, particularly when these prostitution stings target Asian massage businesses.
At best, these stings tend to be dubious uses of resources and authority—marshaling the power of Homeland Security to, say, arrest a few dozen men looking to pay a consenting adult woman for sex or arrest people with "escort service violations" and random outstanding warrants.
At worst, they put people vulnerable to violence and sexual exploitation in more precarious positions—by helping arrest sex workers and saddling them with court fees and criminal records, for instance, or helping seize the assets of immigrant sex workers and masseuses—and even subject suspected trafficking victims to sexual encounters under false pretenses.
HSI agents had at least 17 sexual encounters with Asian massage workers in Mohave County, Arizona, in 2018, for instance. Dubbed "Operation Asian Touch," these excursions were billed as a way to investigate human trafficking.
Women arrested for performing paid sex acts with HSI agents or informants may wind up deported afterward.
This is not to say that HSI never helps investigate cases of actual violence and exploitation involving prostitution. But in covering this area for a decade, I've encountered countless cases of HSI offering dubious or even dangerous "help" to human trafficking victims and immensely fewer instances of the agency actually seeming to stop abuse.
Whatever good HSI does on the sex trafficking front, it's pretty incidental to the ample operations that simply target sex workers, massage workers, and their customers.
What the IMPACTT Human Trafficking Act Would (and Would Not) Do
The IMPACTT Human Trafficking Act, from Sen. Gary Peters (D–Mich.), was co-sponsored by two Republicans (Oklahoma Sen. James Lankford and Texas Sen. John Cornyn).
The first thing it would do is establish in HSI an Investigators Maintain Purposeful Awareness to Combat Trafficking Trauma (IMPACTT) program to "provide outreach and training" to HSI employees who have been "exposed to various forms of trauma in working with victims of human trafficking." The training might include "self-awareness training" on recognizing things like burnout, "compassion fatigue," and "vicarious trauma," along with education on "mechanisms for self-care and resilience."
I don't know about you, but I find it a little bit amusing and also immensely eyeroll-worthy to see social media self-help tropes like "self-care"and "burnout" creeping into federal legislation.
At least this bill isn't all about providing resilience training for the poor HSI agents forced to bust immigrant women for prostitution.
It would also create a formal HSI victim assistance program to "provide oversight, guidance, training, travel, equipment, and coordination to Homeland Security Investigations victim assistance personnel" and recruit more forensic interview specialists and victim assistance specialists. "Currently, only the largest HSI field offices have a victim assistance specialist, but this legislation would ensure that every HSI office with a human trafficking or child exploitation task force would have a survivor assistance specialist to carry out this important work," said Rep. Glenn Ivey (D–Md.) during a September 23 House floor debate about the bill.
The efficacy of these specialists is debatable—I often see press about prostitution busts make nods to the victim services specialists HSI had on hand but nothing to indicate these specialists helped in any substantial way or even found any victims to help. Still, they're theoretically there to offer kinder, gentler, trauma-informed interactions with potential victims, and that can't be a bad thing.
The victim assistance program would also be tasked with offering material support. One of the few tangible things that the IMPACTT bill stipulates is that the victims assistance program will "purchase emergency items that are needed to assist identified victims in Homeland Security Investigations criminal investigations, including food, clothing, hygiene products, transportation, and temporary shelter that is not otherwise provided by a nongovernmental organization."
Of course, "no additional funds are authorized to be appropriated for the purpose of carrying out this Act," which is sort of telling. I'm not saying HSI needs any more money for these purposes. But bills geared toward throwing more cops and more enforcement at a problem tend to have large budget increases attached so it seems worth pointing out that the expansion of victims' services isn't getting a commensurate boost.
More Sex & Tech News
• "Four lawsuits. Several failed attempts to raise the threshold to pass constitutional amendments. One unprecedented attempt to decertify a ballot measure. Despite this succession of failed GOP efforts to torpedo Amendment 3 over the past 18 months, abortion will remain on Missouri's Nov. 5 ballot," reports the Missouri Independent.
• Rep. Lauren Boebert (R–Colo.) has introduced a bill that would require all owners and employees of massage businesses and wellness spas to be fingerprinted and undergo background checks.
• Don't forget that the people fighting to take all sorts of books off library shelves are the same people who are "pushing laws that restrict consensual and legal online porn through inequitable age verification laws," writes Michael McGrady at Techdirt.
Today's Image

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Really?!? He admits it?
In other words, in plain English other words, both Michael McGrady at Techdirt and Elizabeth Nolan Brown at Reason admit that the books people are trying to get off library shelves are, indeed, porn.
I can't help it. This is one of the funniest own-goals in a while, by one of the
writerssenior editors who has been pushing the contrary narrative the longest and hardest (ooooh, trigger warning). It really tickles my funny bone.And, and, further to clarify that I don't think stocking libraries is any of the government's business. But this so-called libertarian site and senior editor sure do, and for them to be caught saying the quiet part out loud like this, while pretending their only objection is to classifying things as porn, is too much fun to pass up. Either government should butt out (oooooh, trigger warning!) entirely, or you're not a libertarian.
I don’t see how you can conclude that. It just says [some of] the opponents are the same.
It's like reading that the same people are opposed to legal guns and legal drugs, and concluding that guns are drugs.
Lotsa ruck acquainting mystical Trumpanzistas with the elements of formal reasoning and logical deduction. Every mystical moron ever to importune me has quailed at the three-liars-problem Lewis Carroll taught teens to solve back before the Civil War. Rules of inference, by evangelical lights, are Beelzebub's "gateway sins" that lead directly to murder, Gomorrahry and cheating at poker--the Highway to Hell in other words. Raising the subject is their probable cause for a strip-search to uncover cloven hooves or a pointy tail.
I think you might be reading a bit too much into that.
I bet you can't explain how. If you could have, why didn't you?
I thought it was fairly obvious. Pushing to remove books and pushing for online age verification for porn are two different things.
You are making a leap based on a bunch of assumptions. There are reasons not to want to have certain books in school libraries other than their being porn.
Of course, people also might have different definitions for "porn". I wouldn't say that a sexually explicit book on sexuality (like that famous example with the dildo blowjob) is porn per se, but it's still probably inappropriate for a school library.
*I* didn't make the connection, ENB did.
Here:
Do you really think those two are disconnected? ENB didn't think so.
You made the connection that it must mean that the banned/removed books are porn. Your conclusion was that it was an admission that the books were porn, not that the two issues were in some way or another connected.
That's really all I'm trying to say here. Please don't assume I have some secret underlying motivation, because I think we do mostly agree on the underlying issue of queering up kids in public schools.
How does my tomato/pizza analogy differ from hers? Why is it not reasonable to conclude that two sentences intentionally in the same paragraph have some connection?
Comstockists are good at imagining sane people share the paranoid phobias they invent as justification for deadly force.
For queering up kids the government exempts mystical Catholic and Lutheran schools from taxation. Non-mystical educational institutions can count on weekly tax audits and midget agent infiltrators posing as students with throwdown guns, dope and porn SD cards until they become extinct again. Recommended reading: A Religious Orgy in Tennessee, by HL Mencken.
I guess if you ignore exactly which books, what's in them and why they're targeted that might be true but here you're just being ignorant or dishonest.
Where did it specify exactly which books?
Get a load of the Comstockist pettifoggery! Anything that bullies, robs, rapes or kills girls is moral, ethical, just and correct by their standards. The easy part is feigning bovine incomprehension in order to sidestep awkward questions. See: https://libertariantranslator.wordpress.com/2018/05/16/republicans-banned-all-birth-control/
"The bill would provide "self-care" services to Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) staff exposed to victims of human trafficking."
So giving them the penicillin to take for themselves?
Or lube to jerk off with?
Massages. With Happy Endings, of course
ALL of ye UNBLEEVERS need to GROW UP and develop some sympathy for the Devil! Um, I mean, sympathy for POOR little shittle old overpaid and overlaid undercover Fed-Narks who, ass a prerequisite to getting paid, must get laid by hookers and massage artists and fartists!?!?! Do ye have a CLUE ass to HOW horribly stressfull shit is, to get laid by EVIL she-Devil hookers?!?!?! PLEASE give Our Pubic Servants and Serpents ALL of the sympathy and therapy that They might NEED!!! Our Govermnet Almighty Certified, Degreed, Licensed, Edumacated, and Credentialed Therapy Industry DEPENDS on Their Needs!!!!
HAVE SOME SYMPATHY FOR THE POOR AND ABUSED, infidels!!!
"Investigators Maintain Purposeful Awareness to Combat Trafficking Trauma (IMPACTT) "
Why try and make some piece of legislation an acronym if you aren't even going to spell the word correctly? Come on.
Very Astute Government Intellectuals Never Apologize
You have to remember that "T" is the most important letter in the alphabet these days.
Disgraceful.
That part is different. IMPACTT provides helmet with rearview mirror for awareness of when the looter entrapment agent's little woman is winding up for the cast-iron skillet to the parietal or occipital region. This comes under the heading of "harm reduction."
"The DSM is Insane!"
Cool story, bro.
But, but, .gov is only there to help!
What the heck is "self-care"? Seems odd that it's something that someone else would provide.
"Self-care" is what Gwyneth Paltrow's dildo-of-the-month club provides.
Is that what Goop is up to lately?
Carlin had a good rant about that.
It's a circle-jerk for shell-shocked, sensitive, concerned and aware entrapment-violation-forfeiture thugs whose wives got wind of their job description and evicted them from the house with a well-swung cast-iron skillet. The hygiene products in the gubmint facility include gel, ice bags and whatnot.
Don't forget that the people fighting to take all sorts of books off library shelves are the same people who are "pushing laws that restrict consensual and legal online porn through inequitable age verification laws," writes Michael McGrady at Techdirt.
Think about this sentence carefully Elizabeth. Fucking journalist advocates have tunnel vision.
Zeb says you and I are reading too much into that.
Just reading what Jenna Journalist wrote.
I said you might be. And you might be. Do you know what all of the books people are objecting to being removed are and if they are in fact pornographic?
My only point here is that it is better to try to actually understand the arguments of people you disagree with than to just look for convenient "gotcha" quotes.
Her "gotcha" quote jumped right off the page. It's not sloppy writing or non existent copy reading.
I think she intentionally avoids that connection, but will agree that the correlation is there. The through-line here is that conservatives don't want kids exposed to porn. She needs to make a better case against both the intent and methods.
Maybe I'm being extra pedantic here (it has been known to happen). I think there is a worthwhile distinction to be made between books about sex and sexuality and porn, even if neither should be available in public schools.
You're not wrong. I get that using "porn" here instead of "sexually explicit materials for minors" can be a little off the mark. I don't think it's that far off, but can agree with the desire to use precise language.
Everything is whores with her. Is she descended from the Rosato brothers?
Unlike Palito's sock here, I congratulate ENB for noticing how Comstock laws enable God's Own Prohibitionists to use the Postal Monopoly to seize and burn books and "disloyal" Dem propaganda, plus icky birth control articles they rifle out of the mail. This pilfering expanded with the Harrison Act that helped cause WW1, then became actual burglary when felony beer laws turned the populace into heroin users. League of Nations resolutions in 1929 to hire additional thugs in special post offices to rifle the mail absolutely sped up the Crash and Depression for which Republicans disclaim all responsibility. Then came Hoover's Moratorium on Brains in the summer of 1931...
The problem with ENB’s rant about how bad the HSI police are, is that it’s politically in line with the defund the police insanity, and focuses on those abuses. Instead, she should have led with libertarian principles: that creating laws against consensual activity between adults is what legalized the abuse by the government against those who harmed no one. Further, if we were free to sell sexual activity to strangers, the police would be protecting us from abusive customers (and vice versa).
ENB offers no libertarian solution, but writes "... the expansion of victims' services isn't getting a commensurate boost." ENB isn't libertarian, because it isn't government's job to provide restitution to victims of crimes, disasters, bad luck, or poor choices. Instead she might have argued to reduce qualified immunity so government agents fear getting sued for abusing our freedoms (that would be libertarian).
The psychological help, as I see it, would result in HSI people changing jobs because they ought to feel guilty about what they’re doing for a living and pick a moral path they hopefully intended to take when they started. Still, from a libertarian position the government has no business to be involved in prostitution, unless there’s some dispute or harm among others.
Amen! Liberty has been missing from Reason for way too long.
She's not a libertarian. She just likes sexual deviance.
It is traumatizing arresting a whore you just fked five minutes earlier. Can we get self help for the cops wives as well?
Maybe the wives aren't eager to get into a group grope with wankers who've been busily finding, fooling, feeling, raping, railroading and robbing whose working girls. What then? The venue for these orgies is, by stipulation, government property as no landlord wants to host them. So to save money, I modestly suggest the Senate meeting room--when not being used by entrenched looters to rob the public. There's PRECEDENT for that!
there's nothing wrong with providing additional psychological support
Or is there?
Because, honestly, we're seeing the effects of an overly-coddled society. And it's because the last two (if not three) generations spend more time in therapy nurturing anxiety and depression, than they do just sucking it up and facing reality.
Life ain't pretty and it ain't easy. Suck it up buttercup. Rub some dirt on it and get back in the game. And if it's too much for you, quit.
I'm fairly convinced that most of this state funded "psych support" really exists to A) increase the number of Bastiat's glaziers and put them to sweet, sweet taxable work (especially for an economic demographic of little actual utility on a skills-based market); and B) to undermine and ultimately eliminate the heartiness and resilience of the average American and soften them up for government dependency. (They also have this weird side-effect of being really great at breaking up families.)
Maybe your entire premise is wrong, ENB. Maybe there IS something wrong with funding - and encouraging - all this needless hand-holding.
(And I wasn't going to mention it, but it is applicable - most people with a strong faith often lean on it for hope, promise, and the will to overcome the struggles in their lives. And the State seems hellbent - pun fully intended - on ridiculing/eliminating that too.)
Jargon decode translation: "victims" stands for Gestapo pigs assigned to screw, frame, rob and arrest foreign working girls. "Self help" means Gestapo wankers get to wank each other, but not in some alleyway, no siree! They get their own stocked digs for helpful release: "including food, clothing, hygiene products, transportation, and temporary shelter." Photographers, journalists and other non-government narcs unwelcome.