'Sometimes You Need a Strongman,' Trump Declares
The former president's attempts to put a positive spin on the term are consistent with his alarmingly authoritarian instincts.

During his Fox News interview with Sean Hannity on Wednesday night, Donald Trump bragged about Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán's "respect" for him. "They say he's a strongman," Trump said. "Sometimes you need a strongman. He's a strongman."
Since Orbán is not known as a circus performer, Trump's meaning was clear. He was referring to the political version of strongman, variously defined as "a leader who rules by the exercise of threats, force, or violence"; "one who leads or controls by force of will and character or by military methods"; or someone who "has great power and control over his country, although his methods may sometimes be violent or morally wrong." As has long been clear, these are qualities that Trump admires.
Orbán, a self-described proponent of "illiberal Christian democracy," was elected to his third consecutive term as Hungary's prime minister in 2022. Trump endorsed Orbán's reelection, praising his "strong leadership." At a rally last January, he called Orbán "a very great leader" and "a very strong man." Although "some people don't like him because he's too strong," Trump added, "it's nice to have a strongman running the country."
How has Orbán demonstrated his strength? "Since taking power in the 2010 elections," Freedom House notes, Orbán's party, Fidesz, "has pushed through constitutional and legal changes that have allowed it to consolidate control over the country's independent institutions." Those changes have included "antimigrant and anti-LGBT+ policies," attempts to undermine judicial review, and "laws that hamper the operations of opposition groups, journalists, universities, and nongovernmental organizations" that "are critical of the ruling party or whose perspectives Fidesz otherwise finds unfavorable."
Last December, the Hungarian government "enacted the controversial Defense of National Sovereignty Act, which provides for the creation of a National Sovereignty Defense Office with vaguely defined yet extensive powers to investigate and report on any activity suspected of serving foreign interests," Freedom House adds. "Rights defenders have expressed fear that the law will empower authorities to target anyone critical of the government." Overall, the organization gives Hungary a score of 65 out of 100 for political rights and civil liberties, making it "partly free."
That is pretty good compared to North Korea (3), China (9), and Russia (13), all of which were rated as "not free" in 2023. But it is not so good compared to most of Europe, where countries typically were rated as "free," with scores ranging from 78 (Bulgaria) to 100 (Finland). According to Freedom House, Hungary was also considerably less free than Canada (97), Australia (95), and the United States (83).
You may take issue with some of Freedom House's criteria or the way they are applied. But Trump is not arguing that Orbán, a hero to many American conservatives, has been unfairly maligned as a "strongman." He is arguing that the term's negative connotation is misleading, because "sometimes you need a strongman."
That attitude is consistent with Trump's generally authoritarian instincts, including his presentation of himself as a uniquely effective leader who gets things done by projecting strength; his admiration of foreign autocrats in countries such as China, Russia, and the Philippines; his disregard for election results, civil liberties, and constitutional constraints on executive power; his conflation of progressives with communists (a rhetorical habit he shares with Orbán); his assertion of sweeping presidential immunity from criminal charges; and his reflexive opposition to holding police officers accountable when they abuse their powers. One need not succumb to "Trump derangement syndrome" or invoke Nazi analogies to find these tendencies deeply troubling.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
LMAO.
RMIAFAA
Yes, Trump is totally alarming. Meanwhile on the same home page is a story that Biden is again going to give the Supreme Court and Legislative Branch the finger trying to cancel, illegally, more student debt in an attempt to buy Harris some votes. This just after a story of Haaland waving a pen and locking up another 28,000,000 acres of land from development/drilling.
No.
I agree, just say "NO!" to strong-smelling strong-men! Get them some DEODORANT, and pronto!
(Can we PLEASE enlist Queen Spermy Daniels, Who Art Drenched in Vaseline, to support this effort?)
#QueenSpermyDanielsPleaseTrainAndRestrainYourStrongMan
EVERY fucking politician has strongman and authoritarian tendencies, by definition. "Elect me to tell you what to do and not do."
Who was more authoritarian in practice, Trump for 4 years, Biden for 50 years, or Kamala for, I dunno, 15-20 years?
Who's bragging about throwing stoners in jail, about censoring?
Jeez, bud, get over it. Your TDS is destroying you.
I'd agree with you, but quibble over the tense. Destroyed. Past tense. Long ago. So much he's not worth reading. A completely useless waste of column inches and should have been let go years ago.
I came straight to the comments.
Do you REALLY think and stink that this is a one-sided problem?
Got news for ya, bud!
Hey conservatives!!! How about a “Grand Compromise”? Y’all give up your “abortion boners”, in exchange for lib-tards giving up their “gun boners”?
This looks like a prime opportunity for me to explain a few things I’ve learned on this planet, while becoming a geezer. A few things, that is, about human nature, and excessive self-righteousness, tribalism, the “rush to judge” others, and the urge to punish.
“Team R” politician: “The debt is too large, and government is too powerful. If you elect ME, I will FIX that budget-balance problem SOON! But, first things first! THOSE PEOPLE OVER THERE ARE GETTING ABORTIONS!!! We must make the liberals CRY for their sins! AFTER we fix that RIGHT AWAY, we’ll get you your budget balanced and low taxes!”
“Team D” politician: “The debt is too large, and I’ll get that fixed soon, I promise you, if you elect ME! First, the more important stuff, though: THOSE PEOPLE OVER THERE ARE OWNING GUNS!!! We must PROTECT the American People from guns and gun-nuts!!! AFTER we fix that RIGHT AWAY, we’ll get our budgets balanced!”
And then we gripe and gripe as Government Almighty grows and grows, and our freedoms shrink and shrink. And somehow, the budget never DOES get balanced!
Now LISTEN UP for the summary: Parasites and politicians (but I repeat myself) PUSSY GRAB US ALL by grabbing us by… Guess what… by our excessive self-righteousness, tribalism, the “rush to judge” others, and the urge to PUNISH-PUNISH-PUNISH those “wrong” others! Let’s all STOP being such fools, and STOP allowing the politicians OF BOTH SIDES from constantly pussy-grabbing us all, right in our urge to… Pussy-grab the “enemies”, which is actually ALL OF US (and our freedoms and our independence, our ability to do what we want, without getting micro-managed by parasites)!!!
Shorter and sweeter: The pussy-grabbers are actually pussy-grabber-grabbers, grabbing us all in our pussy-grabbers. Let us all (as best as we can) AMPUTATE our OWN nearly-useless-anyways pussy-grabbers, and the pussy-grabber-grabbers will NOT be able to abuse us all NEARLY ass much ass these assholes are doing right now!
Or do you ENJOY seeing extra tax money of yours endlessly wasted ass BOTH SIDES pussy-grab each other in grandstanding maneuvers that actually do us no good whatsoever?
It's even worse because Trump's meaning is that there needs to be a strong executive to push back against and dismantle a bureaucracy that doesn't serve the people. On the international front it basically means peace through strength.
As much as I'd have liked to see him be more successful in those goals, his record shows this is how he intends to govern. If Sullum wants to see an example of the authoritarian he is feigning fear of the he needs to look no further than the current administration defying the constitution and court orders.
Yes, THIS is why we must “Hang Mike Pence”!
Trump agrees with “Hang Mike Pence!”
https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/25/politics/donald-trump-january-6-mike-pence-chants/index.html
Trump reacted with approval to ‘hang Mike Pence’ chants from rioters on January 6
Trump = Strong Man = political violence.
Mind reading 101-
Since Orbán is not known as a circus performer, Trump's meaning was clear. He was referring to the political version of strongman, variously defined as "a leader who rules by the exercise of threats, force, or violence"; "one who leads or controls by force of will and character or by military methods"; or someone who "has great power and control over his country, although his methods may sometimes be violent or morally wrong." As has long been clear, these are qualities that Trump admires.
Duterte, Putin, Xi, Orban, Bolsonaro - all authoritarian strongmen Donnie admires. And the fat little Korean dictator is another favorite of Donnie.
GRAB YER TIKI TORCHES BOYS! UNITE THE RIGHT!
Rightee tightee, lefty loosee...
I'm putting on my tights to get rightee tightee!!! I'm a lumberjerk, and I'm ALL Right!!!
"GRAB YER TIKI TORCHES BOYS! UNITE THE RIGHT!"
Turned out that was your Lincoln Project proggy pedo pals:
The Lincoln Project sent a group posing as white supremacists with tiki torches to a GOP campaign event in Virginia ahead of the state's gubernatorial election
Lol. You never stop owning your own ass. This is why Open Society fired you.
Charlottesville, you dumbass Canuck.
I know you want to whitewash it because your Neo-Nazi brethren made conservatives look bad.
turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Hey, numbnuts. There were 2 separate events where the Tiki mob showed up. Original in Charlottesville that no one expected and the one linked in the story which was a complete Dem operation aided by those clowns at The Lincoln Project. That blond chick in the picture was actually a Dem staffer.
And which "Unite the Right" event do you think SPB2 was referring to?
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Jacob is wielding The Dictionary like Jeffy does.
Creatively and deceptively?
Reluctantly and strategically?
I was thinking more like "mindlessly".
Hope Jacob knows math better than Jeff does.
I've seen no evidence that Jacob knows anything.
Freedom House sees no problems with what is going on in the UK, so I have serious doubts about their views on any country on Earth.
Nothing wrong with the UK. Labour won a blowout election, largely because of catastrophe of Brexit. Some on the Right are pissed that voters realized that Brexit was a catastrophe.
Arresting people over posts online? Arresting people for praying outside?
Your respect for free speech is, of course, duly noted.
That's not exactly a great call on the elections across the pond. There wasn't a "blowout". Take a look at the vote totals.
You don't understand how Parliamentary elections work in the UK. The Tories went from 344 seats to 141; Labour went from 205 seats to 411. It was a massive blowout. It was the Tories "worst ever" election result.
It wasn't as huge a win in the popular vote (34% vs 24%--yes, the winner actually only got 1/3 of the votes), but like in the US, the popular vote is not how the Prime Minister or the President is selected. But need I remind you, you don't believe in the popular vote anyway--because Trump lost it in both previous elections (and will also lose it in the next one)?
What does "how Parliament works" excuse the terrible speech restrictions they just enacted? You are trying to deflect from the topic.
So we can wholly change the definition of vaccine to support the FDA, CDC, COVID, and lockdowns…
We can, in real time, change the definition of ‘sexual preference’ to be a slur in response to its use by a Supreme Court Justice…
But there’s no room to consider that ‘strongman’ does not actually refer to a leader who rules through oppression and violence or is not an unusually oppressive authoritarian and is just a ‘strong man’ who hasn’t actually perpetrated any real violence in the background of other leaders who arrest protesters, freeze their bank accounts, crack down on their free speech in response to brutal attacks by their social/political opposition, encourage mostly peaceful arson, perpetrate show trials against their political opposition…
No matter how much you hate the media. It's not enough.
We HAD Trump as president, and he didn't make me feel any less free. Since then, we've had a WEAK MAN who made us less free. Bring back the strong man, please!
Not only made us feel less free, but indeed, made us less free:
"...In his first days in office, President Joe Biden moved to dismantle a slew of Trump-era regulations and make sweeping measures to bolster the nation’s Covid-19 response.
The new president also ordered the establishment a variety of environmental protections and changes to immigration policy.
As he embarks on his first full work week as president, Biden is poised to continue scrapping a number of the Trump administration’s policies, including the controversial transgender military ban..."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/here-s-full-list-biden-s-executive-actions-so-far-n1255564
Note that the 'regulations' removed by Biden were those which limited regulations by Trump: "Freedom" = more regulations.
We HAD Trump as president, and he didn’t make me feel any less free.
He made me feel less free when he decided that he only needed to convince some Republicans in a few state legislatures and Mike Pence that the election was stolen from him in order to change his loss into a win.
Maybe he'll feel less free when it is just some Democrats in New York that believe him to be guilty of felonies that gets him put in jail.
What a child you are.
You compare pointing out illegal election changes and illegal votes is worse than locking up your political enemies. Lol.
https://reason.com/2024/08/20/democrats-just-cant-quit-saving-our-souls/?comments=true#comment-10693993
You didn't reply when I broke down and answered each of your claims about the 2020 election that you listed, to the extent that your claims were specific enough to check. I'm not going to argue about anything with you again. Continue believing what shows you to be a loyal Trump follower instead of what has objective evidence to support it. You obviously will do that no matter what I say.
Your example of him being a strongman and threatening freedom is when he tried to convince people to do what he wanted, they said “no”, and then he left on the appointed day at the appointed time?
L O Fucking L.
That sums up the Leftist mindset quite nicely.
Your example of him being a strongman and threatening freedom is when he tried to convince people to do what he wanted, they said “no”, and then he left on the appointed day at the appointed time?
I didn't say that he is or was a strongman. I was saying how he made me feel less free because - He's a wannabe strongman. He failed to convince enough people to do what he wanted to stay in the White House. I don't give him credit for leaving that building "on the appointed day at the appointed time" because, well, what was his choice at that point? It's not like he has any personal physical courage that would drive him to physically resist being thrown out of the building.
Yet you seem to want to give him another chance to do it successfully this time and become a strongman. You want to give him a second chance to hire only "the best people" that will all be completely loyal to him and make 2+2 = whatever Trump wants.
Trump's meaning is clearly that you need a leader who can't be pushed around. It's the intent that makes the difference. A noble strongman morally defending the interests of his people is a good thing. Jacob ignores actual tyranny and what Trump did in office to make up a dumb hypothetical
Trump was referring to Orban, Putin and Duterte, not to some hypothetical other leader who nobly resisted being "pushed around".
It is great that Trump has all of these people willing to translate the words he actually uses in the context in which he actually spoke them into something benign or even something wise and virtuous, despite having to make fools of themselves to do it.
Orban is a strongman on the sense that he’s willing to go against the political concensus without apology. This is just another on a very long line of predictable articles wringing every possible bad meaning out of something Trump says. I'm no Trump voter, and yet…
This is just another on a very long line of predictable articles wringing every possible bad meaning out of something Trump says.
It’s not just Trump. He may be the underlying animus, but they’ll wring bad meaning out of the term ‘sexual preference’ or the phrase ‘I like beer.’ if a Supreme Court Justice, who was only appointed by Trump, says them.
I remember when they compared some Hungarian legislation to Hitler's January 1933 Enabling Act, that Orban was the new Hitler.
Funny how that never happened.
And yet... a looter Trumpanzista would never lie, right?
Orban is a strongman on the sense that he’s willing to go against the political concensus without apology.
Political consensus is supposed to be expressed by voters choosing their government freely in elections where every candidate has the same rights and practical ability to try and convince voters to choose them. When that is how a political consensus is achieved, then the very purpose of representative government is for the government to implement that political consensus.
If, on the other hand, the current leader is preventing the electorate from freely choosing its government, through the kinds of methods Orban uses, then the people deserve more than an apology from that leader. They deserve to be able to remove him from leadership.
Umm... dumbass... did you see what the DNC just did? See them try to keep Trump, RFK, and others off ballots?
How dumb are you? Courts literally ruled states acted illegally in regards to voting in 2020 dumbass.
I’m glad you can see what authoritarian shitheels the Democrats have been over the last couple of years. Welcome.
The left is still pissed that Orban gave the EU the finger and said "no illegal invasion by Muslims in our country". Turns out, there have been no massive increase in rapes or knife attacks. Funny how once in a while 1 + 1 actually does equal 2
This. I don't have to like everything someone like Orban or Putin does to acknowledge that they're bucking entrenched powers that harm their people. Call out the excesses and illegal exercises of power as they happen, but don't ignore the corrupt destructive powers they are pushing against.
This. I don’t have to like everything someone like Orban or Putin does to acknowledge that they’re bucking entrenched powers that harm their people.
For Putin, at least, you “don’t have to like” that he ordered the full invasion of a sovereign nation 8 years after a de facto invasion of parts of that nation and he declared those regions annexed into Russia over the course of those 8 years. He justified all of that with bullshit propaganda. He has had how many journalists and defectors murdered? He completely controls all media within Russia and instills fear in the population that suppresses dissent.
But hey, he’s doing all of that because he’s “bucking entrenched powers that harm [his] people.” So, what exactly is the purpose of acknowledging that?
Call out the excesses and illegal exercises of power as they happen, but don’t ignore the corrupt destructive powers they are pushing against.
When the “corrupt destructive powers they are pushing against” is not itself a statement of fact, but propaganda disputed by the people in those countries that aren’t free to speak, then wanting to see the “excesses” of power being used stopped before addressing those claims is the correct goal.
There is an old saying:
Strong men make good times
Good times make weak men
Weak men make hard times.
Hard times make strong men.
We seem to need the last line to happen
Strong men make good times... For THEIR Tribe for a LITTLE WHILE... It doesn't last long! "Thousand year Reich", my ass! Learn your history, power-grabber PUNK!
It (the power of power pigs) doesn't last very long "because good times make weak men", it doesn't last long because the scapegoats, the outcasts, and the subjugated nations (and slaves) rise up, unite, and SMITE the power pigs! Karma, fool! Twat cums around, goes around!
Trump is the "weak man". He just thinks he's the "strong man".
Hungary has dealt with the Muslims, the Nazis and the Soviets. They've been independent for 3 decades after 8 of being occupied. The EU is trying to force 3rd world migrants on them and they aren't having it. In the world that exists he's doing what has to be done to save Hungary for Hungarians.
He's also not too popular with the neocons. That would explain why the Koch libertarians find him so terrifying. I mean they actually published this today.
https://reason.com/2024/09/05/the-war-in-ukraine-is-already-over-russia-just-doesnt-know-it-yet/
Eventually the Russians will tire of fucking around, and will neutralize Ukraine with strategic weapons. The outcome of the war has never been in doubt.
Yeah, dragging it out for two years, at a cost of billions of Roubles and tens of thousands of Russian lives was all part of Putin's plan!
Annexing Ukraine intact was a prize worth paying for. But, when it looks like that's not going to happen, Putin will settle for scorched earth.
You know, I wondered how the hell the Harris campaign could think they could win an election substituting "vibes" for substantive debate. Reading this from Reason kind of gives me a good hint as to how. It's kind of pathetic that the country's educated classes are so incapable of rigorous or analytical critical thinking that this sort of article would pass as analysis. But, I guess, here we are. When you take it out of befuddled popular usage, a strongman can be (using Sullum's cited definition) just a leader who "leads or controls by force of will and character". Hell, that would be an apt description of George Washington.
It very obviously bbn passed rigorous analysis consisting of “do you declare OrangeManBad?” and on that metric Jacob aces the propagandist test.
"You know, I wondered how the hell the Harris campaign could think they could win an election substituting “vibes” for substantive debate. Reading this from Reason kind of gives me a good hint as to how..."
Yeah, recruiting TDS-addled piles of shit like Sullem to ignore substantive issues is a great help.
Sullem? Stuff your TDS up your ass; your head is begging for company.
And then make your family proud and your dog happy: FOAD, steaming pile of shit.
That would absolutely put Obama as a chief negative example (though Sullum had very little bad to say during his presidency.) It's a leader who accomplishes tasks through force of will, ego, and charm. It is an effective form of leadership. The danger is if that leader pursues bad goals or methods. If only Reason could manage to soberly assess policy instead of bleating partisan vibes.
Admit it Jacob, the only Reason you guys don’t like Orban is because he didn’t bend the knee to Davos.
For example, this is literally what the Biden administration has spent the last four years doing or attempting to do:
Since taking power in the 2010 elections,” Freedom House notes, Orbán’s party, Fidesz, “has pushed through constitutional and legal changes that have allowed it to consolidate control over the country’s independent institutions.” Those changes have included “antimigrant and anti-LGBT+ policies,” attempts to undermine judicial review, and “laws that hamper the operations of opposition groups, journalists, universities, and nongovernmental organizations” that “are critical of the ruling party or whose perspectives Fidesz otherwise finds unfavorable.”
Last December, the Hungarian government “enacted the controversial Defense of National Sovereignty Act, which provides for the creation of a National Sovereignty Defense Office with vaguely defined yet extensive powers to investigate and report on any activity suspected of serving foreign interests,” Freedom House adds.”
Flip it around to Catholics and PAC parents and it fits to a tee, and yet we didn’t here one peep from you. I guess that’s (D)ifferent, right?
Orban is pretty much the only voice in the EU who has been trying to find a settlement to the war in Ukraine. for this he is relentlessly slandered in the press and by outfits like Reason. He has publicly stated that only Trump can end the slaughter at this point.
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/hungarys-orban-says-no-position-negotiate-between-ukraine-russia-2024-07-05/
https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/jul/16/trump-has-detailed-and-well-founded-plans-to-end-ukraine-war-says-orban
The only fair settlement in Ukraine is a full Russian withdrawal followed by reparations. Trump will end the slaughter by allowing Putin to take over Ukraine and commit genocide there; the slaughter will be over when Putin is done killing people.
"...Trump will end the slaughter by allowing Putin to take over Ukraine and commit genocide there; the slaughter will be over when Putin is done killing people."
You.
Are.
Full.
Of.
Shit.
Charlie, you missed the memo, Trump is going to start WW3.
-DNC
That last example is the CIA. Some of those issues sound bad, but I'd like to see the specifics.
Oh, yeah, Canada is a "free country" and so is Australia.
Yeah, Canada is kind of a joke with their EV mandates and COVID tyranny and extreme taxes and freezing protestors' assets.
Sure, it seems like France, the UK, somewhere in between, or all three have been on fire every other month for Jacob and Reason to distinctly *not* report on... and, sure, they nodded right along with their co-conspirators in front of burning police stations in this country and said "mostly peaceful", but when it comes to parsing "strongman" from "strong man", they've got you covered.
Depends on compared to what.
The slimy pile of TDS-addled shit Sullem's attempts to put a negative spin on anything Trump says are consistent with his alarmingly demented condition.
FOAD, asshole
has pushed through constitutional and legal changes that have allowed it to consolidate control over the country's independent institutions
Should mention that they had a total majority to change the laws/constitution.
antimigrant and anti-LGBT+ policies," attempts to undermine judicial review, and "laws that hamper the operations of opposition groups, journalists, universities, and nongovernmental organizations"
This isn't authoritarian, it is however anti-egalitarian, which is why I like Orban at all.
Sullum ain't the first to notice. These Prohibitionist States were Anschlussed by mystical bigots in the 1920 election. Germany, regularly visited by Harding's 3 galpals, exported drugs to dry Amerika and paid victorious drug exporting competitors war reparations with the proceeds. Bert Hoover and Anslinger fixed THAT with the dope Limitation Convention of 13JUL1931. Bayer, Temmler, IG Farben and others retaliated by financing the Christian National Socialist Party, Hitler became top dog within 2 years and... all lived happily ever after, right?
Funny.
Trump and MAGA is completely against the [Na]tional So[zi]alist supporting party. Once again; you have your parties mixed up.
Hank is at least as demented as leakin' Joe or the TDS-addled shit-pile Sullem
Truth is that the world does need strong men sometimes. Especially women, when they're trying to open that pickle jar.
They just can't do it on their own, and they need someone to step up and do it for them. That's just how it is - both in life and politics.
Of course, Democrats know this too. But when they apply it, it's super duper racist. Especially towards blacks and latinos. Lowered expectations and all that, necessitating a strong man (well, they to think of themselves more as "masters") to keep them upright and out of trouble.
None of this has anything to do with "authoritarianism," lol. That's silly. It's just knowing who can get a job done, and who can't.
Sullum paraphrased, “Anyone who attempts to honor their oath of office and uphold the US Constitution against the Nazi’s is an Authoritarian strong man all the Nazi’s should be afraid of!”
I think Sullum just answered the question of which nation his mind resides in; A US Constitutional Republic or a [WE] gangland [Na]tional So[zi]alist Empire.
That right there explains 99% of all conflict across party lines. Instead of disputes on what a USA is the mis-understanding is more than 1/2 the nation has been brainwashed to think the US is a [WE] mob Nazi-Empire.
Yes the treasonous Nazi's should be afraid, very afraid, of the De-Regulating Strong-Man Trump. He 'hollowed' out their 'public'/Nazi Institutions. Their fear is stated right in their platform and all evidence points to that fear being legitimate .......... for Nazi's anyways.
Sullum is a pile of TDS-addled shit who should write for CNN.
Jakey Jakey News Is Fakey.
You're not going to pare back the bureaucratic gympie-gympie/kudzu hybrid that is the US government with a fucking milquetoast moron, and unless voting is locked down with ID, only a 5 day period with indelible ink to make sure someone didn't vote more than once, and the House is increased in number to 75k pop per member, you'll never get those shitstains to do so either. So that means a strongman willing to take a chainsaw to the thing or the eventual dissolution of the United States under crushing debt and socialism. Your fucking choice Sullum.
DONALD TRUMP: So I had a great relationship with President XI of China. Really very close relationship. Now he likes China! I like us!
But, I don’t want to sound foolish, he’s my dear, dear friend! He’s a tough guy! He’s a fierce person!
I say very smart. You know when you say he’s smart, the fake news. That’s crazy. You said President XI is smart. And I say, you know, he controls 1.4 billion people with an iron fist. He’s smart!
But we had a very good relationship with China until Covid. And when that came in, it was a whole different ballgame as far as I was concerned. Yeah, we made a great China trade deal or maybe better than the U.S.M.C.A.
And I never talk about it because what happened with Covid for the whole world. $60 trillion. And, you know, deaths 70,000,000,060. Nobody even knows somebody else. And it all came out of Wuhan. And so it changed my relationship.
But I think I’ll have a great relationship with China. I had one before and they respected us, but they respected us because they no longer thought we were fools.
They used to think we were fools because we built China. They would take over $500 billion a year and use it for the military and other things. So we got nothing out of that.
We got some cheap product. We got, you can buy 19 pencils instead of two, who the hell cares? You can buy 16 dolls for your daughter instead of two nice dolls.
So the Democrats need to subvert democracy to save democracy, and Trump needs to enact tyranny to prevent tyranny. Both sides, indeed.
I'm not going to read through all the comments who suggest the author was putting words into Trump's mouth. How about the only definition that makes sense for an American President, someone who controls by force of will and character. In other words, someone who can convince other people by words to agree with his policy. And the problem with that is?
Trump has alarmingly authoritarian instincts, sure.
But it is the Xiden-Harris regime who have taken, by far, the most alarmingly authoritarian ACTIONS...
What was that old cliche about actions, words, and their relative speaking volumes, again?