Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Puppycide

A Missouri Police Officer Shot a Blind and Deaf Dog. Now He's Being Sued.

The town of Sturgeon initially defended the officer, saying he was afraid of being bitten by the 13-pound blind and deaf Shih Tzu.

C.J. Ciaramella | 5.30.2024 12:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
dog and lawsuit text | Illustration: Lex Villena | Reason
(Illustration: Lex Villena | Reason)

A man has filed a lawsuit against the town of Sturgeon, Missouri, a little more than a week after a police officer shot and killed his small, blind, and deaf dog.

In a federal lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, Nicholas Hunter alleges that Officer Myron Woodson and the city of Sturgeon violated his Fourth Amendment rights when Woodson killed Teddy, his 13-pound blind and deaf Shih Tzu, shortly after finding the dog wandering in a neighbor's yard on May 19.

"Woodson's warrantless seizure of Teddy was unnecessary, callous, and egregious as it was unwarranted by law and violative of Plaintiff Hunter's most fundamental and guaranteed of constitutional rights," Hunter's lawsuit says. "At no time during the encounter between Teddy and Defendant Woodson did Teddy show any aggression towards Defendant Woodson. Teddy never barked, growled, or even moved towards Defendant Woodson. Instead, the small, blind and deaf dog simply kept trying to walk away, oblivious to the danger that Defendant Woodson posed to him."

The shooting has outraged the town's residents, especially after body camera footage obtained by a local news outlet contradicted the officer and city officials' narrative of events. The mayor of Sturgeon resigned last Saturday evening after defending the shooting for several days, and Woodson has been placed on leave.

The shooting, though, is only an egregious example of a phenomenon that is so common that it has its own tag on Reason's website: "puppycide." No one knows exactly how many dogs police shoot around the country, but every year there are more cases of wanton killings that, besides terrorizing owners, generate huge lawsuits, viral outrage, and in rare instances result in officers being fired, such as the case of an Arkansas officer who casually killed a nine-pound dog.

The incident in Sturgeon started when Teddy dug under Hunter's backyard fence while Hunter was out at dinner and escaped, leaving its collar behind in the process. A neighbor called a county dispatch center to report that the dog had wandered into their yard and to get help finding its owner. According to Hunter's lawsuit, the caller responded, "No, not at all," when asked if the dog was aggressive.

The town of Sturgeon's official Facebook page actually posted an alert on May 19 about the missing dog, along with photos of Teddy: "Do you know this doggie? Joint communications has been notified. The doggie seems in need of medical attention."

Medical attention was not what the doggie received. Woodson arrived on the scene, and a few minutes later he shot Teddy twice.

In the meantime, Hunter had been called and told about the Facebook post. He was on his way to pick up Teddy, but arrived too late.

A day later, the city of Sturgeon posted on Facebook about the incident, defending Woodson's decision: "Based on the behavior exhibited by the dog, believing the dog to be severely injured or infected with rabies, and as the officer feared being bitten and being infected with rabies, the SPD officer felt that his only option was to put the animal down," Sturgeon wrote. "It was later learned that the animal's behavior was because the animal was blind. Unfortunately, the animal's lack of a collar or tags influenced the SPD Officer's decision to put the animal down due to his belief that the animal was injured, sick and abandoned."

Both Hunter and the neighbor filed complaints with the city. "I cannot stress enough that this animal was in no way a threat to others," the neighbor, whose complaint was obtained by local news outlet ABC 17, wrote. "Woodson discharged his firearm multiple times in a residential area without a threat presenting itself, without warning."

ABC 17 also obtained Woodson's body camera footage, which showed that Teddy was never aggressive and didn't bark or growl. Woodson tried to lasso Teddy with a catch pole—a common tool used in animal control—but the dog simply shook its head free of the rope and trotted away. After fumbling the catch pole several times, Woodson drew his gun and killed Teddy. ABC 17 reported that Woodson's entire encounter with Teddy, from exiting his car to putting two bullets in the animal, lasted three minutes and six seconds.

After body camera footage was released, Sturgeon doubled down.

"The City believes that the officer acted within his authority based on the information available to him at the time to protect against possible injury to citizens from what appeared to be an injured, sick, and abandoned dog," Sturgeon posted in a follow-up Facebook post.

Of course, it would have been embarrassing to admit the real reason that the officer resorted to using his gun: He was unable to snare a blind, deaf dog and was too poorly trained to come up with a solution besides shooting a harmless animal.

But police habitually lie about the behavior of dogs that they shoot. Dogs are almost always described in incident reports as snarling, aggressive, or lunging, and because department policies typically allow police to shoot dogs when they feel afraid for their safety, these shootings are almost always deemed justified.

For example, last year in Missouri a police officer shot a family's dog and dumped it in a ditch. Similar to Hunter's case, the dog had gotten loose during a storm, and a neighbor called to report it missing. In another case last year, Detroit cops killed a woman's dog and dumped its body in a trash can. An Arkansas woman also filed a lawsuit after a cop accidentally shot her while trying to kill her Pomeranian—a toy breed that resembles a Koosh ball with legs.

This is the sort of behavior that's flagged as sociopathic when committed by anyone who's not represented by a police union.

And it's the sort of behavior that can cost a small town like Sturgeon quite a lot of money, as city officials are surely fretting now. After Sturgeon's mayor resigned last Friday, the acting mayor posted on Sturgeon's Facebook account: "Like you we were just as appalled by what we saw. The actions of the Officer involved are not the values and beliefs of the residents of Sturgeon or the board of Alderman. Currently I have made calls to the Boone County Sheriff to meet and discuss an investigation."

The city of Sturgeon did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Louisiana Finally Fixes America’s Dumbest Licensing Requirement

C.J. Ciaramella is a reporter at Reason.

PuppycidePolice AbuseMissouriLawsuitsCivil LibertiesFourth AmendmentPetsdogsPolice
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (68)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. R Mac   1 year ago

    If a cop murdered my dog I wouldn’t sue.

    1. Chemjeff, NAMBLA CEO and Radical Pedophilia Enthusiast   1 year ago

      The settlement could fund the subsequent justice/vengeance eventually dealt to the cop.

    2. MrMxyzptlk   1 year ago

      I just noticed your word choice. "Murdered" is a specific charge. I think the charge of murder is reserved for humans? If we expand it to animals as well then aren't the Vegans right?

  2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

    Hat tip to sarc for posting this on the Mourning Lynx?

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      OMG

    2. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

      Hat tip to sarc for being a Hamas apologist?

    3. Chemjeff, NAMBLA CEO and Radical Pedophilia Enthusiast   1 year ago

      This cop is almost as big a pussy as you are Sarc! That really takes something.

  3. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

    I guess the dog ticked off enough of the correct boxes. If the dog had been unimpaired, he’d have been justified in shooting it.

  4. Chumby   1 year ago

    Animal rights groups will hound the officer.

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      They will doggedly pursue justice.

      1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

        Ain't that a bitch!

  5. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

    Asshole cops kill innocent dogs all the time, but this time the officer wasn't being an asshole.

    He was being pretty nice to the dog and trying to catch it with a pole snare at first, but after a while its really strange and odd behavior led him to think it might have rabies so he decides it's safer to shoot it and take it in for an autopsy.

    This wasn't just some cop showing up in a back yard and blasting away at Fido like Ciaramella is insinuating.

    Make up your own mind. Here's the entire video of the shooting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_BRQKCmpCA

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      It not like the dog could see it coming..
      Also, couldn’t hear the “stop resisting “ commands.

    2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

      Bull. I watched the video and the cop simply got tired of the dog failing to obey, so he killed it.

      1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

        It looked like the dog was trespassing on public property, so a clean kill.

        1. Its_Not_Inevitable   1 year ago

          Didn't watch the video. Was the dog wielding a fire extinguisher?

          1. Chemjeff, NAMBLA CEO and Radical Pedophilia Enthusiast   1 year ago

            Then it would be an ‘assault dog’.

        2. MrMxyzptlk   1 year ago

          Leash laws are typically clear, an unleashed animal outside of its owners property can be shot without any justification needed. That even applies to cops.

      2. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

        I wonder if Hamas ever shoot dogs? Then you'd turn against them?

      3. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        Oh fuck off, Sarckles. The dog’s weird behavior started freaking him out.

        I know the liquor in your system allows you to just shake off a rabies bite, but for the rest of us it’s a valid fear.

        1. mad.casual   1 year ago

          As I point out below. Rabies entirely aside. Collarless, blind, deaf opossum or collarless, blind, deaf rat or collarless, blind, deaf coyote.

          I don't and no court should care if you think your Great Great Great Grandma's broken antique cuckoo clock is worth $1M in personal comfort, if you left it on a street corner with no way to identify to whom it belonged and an officer or anyone else tossed it in the nearest trash compacter, at most you get the market value of a shitty cuckoo clock.

          Consider yourself lucky the neighbor didn't just shoot it and not post dick to Facebook like the vast majority of humanity for the vast majority of history. It would've been more humane than what a hawk or coyotes or an aggressive raccoon would've done to it.

          1. Dude 2   1 year ago

            Most of my neighbors have guns, none would have shot the dog. The truth is that Officer Vile's Israeli training taught him to fear for his life as soon as someone or something moves, murder immediately, then claim the victim reached for his waistband. In this case, video shows the victim didn't have a waistband, so the liars in the police department, police union, and local government are now stuck.

            1. mad.casual   1 year ago

              Most of my neighbors have guns, none would have shot the dog.

              Are you going to tell me how they all have black friends too?

            2. MrMxyzptlk   1 year ago

              If it was in my back yard when my grandkids were over it would get shot.

              1. Dude 2   1 year ago

                You would shoot a 13 pound blind and deaf Shih Tzu rather than let your grandchildren play with him? I support American gun rights, but you make a good argument for amending the Second Amendment.

    3. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

      Fatboy simply got tired after pulling on his gloves, walking 100 yards, and trying to catch the dog. I don't see malice, only laziness.

      1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

        Depraved indifference is more like it.

        1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

          I didn't see depraved, but definitely saw indifference.

          1. Its_Not_Inevitable   1 year ago

            It takes a special breed to be a cop.

            1. mad.casual   1 year ago

              Not really. Indifference is pretty standard issue to every public, union, and public union employee in IL, AFAICT.

              I know Reason has to play it up like the police are some sort of separate exceptional breed of superpredators in order to perpetuate their narrative as protagonists championing against some sort of übermensch-dominated but still fat, overweight, and incompetent police state, but after a while, you'd think more of the fanbois would see the inconsistencies in the illusion and the LARPing would get tiresome.

    4. WuzYoungOnceToo   1 year ago

      but this time the officer wasn’t being an asshole

      Yes, he was...and a lazy and incompetent asshole at that.

      trying to catch it with a pole snare

      Which he was too inept to manage...with a small, slow-moving blind and deaf dog.

      odd behavior led him to think it might have rabies

      Oh, bullshit. The dog's behavior was not even remotely indicative of rabies, and at no point did that cop show any concern at all about being in such close proximity to a "possibly rabid" dog.

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        Stop sockpuppeting, Sarckles. Everyone knows it's you.

        1. Chemjeff, NAMBLA CEO and Radical Pedophilia Enthusiast   1 year ago

          I really wish he followed through on his threats and attempted to ‘take me out’.

      2. CE   1 year ago

        Besides, the cop is not a licensed veterinarian.

    5. MoreFreedom   1 year ago

      The real failure here, was to send a cop who knew how to handle dogs, as they apparently don't have a dog catcher. I bet if he got down on his knees, he could have coaxed the dog to come to him, especially if he had a treat. I never saw any indications of aggressiveness from the poor dog. Frankly, it would be cheaper if the city privatized dealing with loose animals, to people who know how to do it.

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        I bet if he got down on his knees, he could have coaxed the dog to come to him, especially if he had a treat.

        How do you “coax” a deaf and blind dog?

        1. m1shu   1 year ago

          As stated above, bribe the dog with a treat. The dog still has a sense of smell. But, you're still on team blast away.

      2. Dude 2   1 year ago

        "Frankly, it would be cheaper if the city privatized dealing with loose animals, to people who know how to do it." Oh, man, I'm with you there. "Privatizing" (I like the euphemism), especially privatizing "to people who know how to do it" (nicely put) would be great, much better than dealing with them by overpaying them, but we do have laws....

      3. MrMxyzptlk   1 year ago

        We have "Animal Control Officers" here. They will tell you dogs are unpredictable and if they are running around without a leash off the owners property you can shoot them and the cops won't do anything to you.

    6. mad.casual   1 year ago

      This wasn’t just some cop showing up in a back yard and blasting away at Fido like Ciaramella is insinuating.

      Just, yet again, C.J. and Reason farting in their own bathtub and laughing their asses off.

      No collar. Blind. Deaf. Cop is guilty of dispensing with a $10 dog and saving the plaintiff $10 in euthanasia fees. Court fees assessed to the plaintiff and C.J. for bothering other people with their retarded $10 shih tzu bullshit. Same as if the officer had found an abandoned McDonald’s No. 4 meal deal and thrown it in the trash.

      Or do the cops have to apprehend every collarless animal with the utmost of care lest anyone have their feelings hurt?

      Does Reason keep a raccoonicide, opossumicide, caticide, rabbiticide, deericide, raticide, chinchilaicide, pangolinicide, cowicide, chickenicide, raccoon dogicide, etc., etc., etc. list too or is the only the animals that are politically and journalistically convenient to their narrative that get a running list?

      1. Dangerangel   1 year ago

        A 10$ dog? You’re a sick fuck.

        Also the city is taking a lawsuit that's going to cost more than 10$. So you're both flat wrong AND a disgusting mass of human flesh.

        1. mad.casual   1 year ago

          So you’re both flat wrong AND a disgusting mass of human flesh.

          You're confusing should with could or would. This is America, you can shutter a McDonalds and get everyone who worked there shitcanned because you spilled coffee on yourself.

          I understand you sick fucks hate your own lives so much that you don't value anyone else's life beyond a used, broken dog, but you really need to realize that ruining someone else's life and burdening the taxpayers either way isn't really more libertarian or moral or honest.

          1. Dangerangel   1 year ago

            >You’re confusing should with could or would.

            No, I’m not you creepy weirdo. No normal, socially adjusted human being would call someone’s senior pet ‘used and broken’, worth 10$, etc… You are profoundly ill.

            >I understand you sick fucks hate your own lives so much that you don’t value anyone else’s life

            Lmao, now you’re just projecting!

    7. Dude 2   1 year ago

      "Safer to shoot it?'" Of course, the shooter is an asshole, as well as retarded. It is established in the headline. As a cop, he is trusted to assess danger quickly, but a cop he is, so he lacks that ability. Considering that the 13 pound dog unable to hear or see wasn't a danger, how could Officer Vile do anything to make the situation safer?

    8. Dude 2   1 year ago

      Wow! That video is absolutely disgusting! “Odd behavior led him to think it might have rabies” my ass. Cop exhibited nothing indicating that he actually thinks and the dogs behavior wasn’t odd. The video is a good example of the people so lazy, mentally impaired, and morally defective that they have almost nothing to offer to those of us living in decent society, so we employ them as cops and security guards thinking they will act mostly as watchmen and occasionally as needed thugs. Unfortunately, by doing so, we let them make decisions with guns as bad as this one.

  6. middlefinger   1 year ago

    Civilization seems to be breaking down. Wanton violence. The Actor in LA murdered for a catalytic converter. Guy lit on fire in NYC subway. Cops killing traffic stops and dogs. Terrorist Despots touring security measures in U.S. airports. illegals at U.S. military bases.

    Gangland mafia state. As the mayor of London announced on stabbings “Just get used to it”.

    1. CE   1 year ago

      London stabbings? I thought London had common sense knife control laws.

      Civilization ends when people stop acting civilized, which was sometime in 2020.

  7. Roberta   1 year ago

    ...

    A Missouri Police Officer Shot a Blind and Deaf Dog. Now He's Being Sued.

    How much could the cop collect from a dog’s estate, anyway? Was he insured?

    1. Chumby   1 year ago

      You win a pony too.

  8. Think It Through   1 year ago

    Shit Sue

  9. mad.casual   1 year ago

    Reading Reason I wouldn't know how many hostages of any ethnicity/nationality are still being held by Hamas nor how many Jan. 6th protesters were held without charges or have been charged and jailed for "not insurrection" nor would I even know that 183 people have been shot and killed and over 1029 shot (but only four by cops) in Chicago or that apparently/supposedly, several hundred people a month in the US are still dying of/with COVID... but I sure as fuck know that 155 dogs have been killed by cops in the last 10 yrs.

    Fuck this magazine. Fucking disgusting.

    1. freedomwriter   1 year ago

      You might be missing the point, that pigs contradicted their narrative.

      TF you care how many people were shot in Chicago? If you are not a gang banger or druggie you are pretty safe everywhere.

      1. mad.casual   1 year ago

        TF you care how many people were shot in Chicago?

        Wow, uh. I didn’t expect anyone to actually convey the sentiment that I and anyone or everyone else should value the life of a deaf, blind dog more than I should value the life of any given human in the nearest city but there it is.

    2. Dude 2   1 year ago

      I read Reason and know those things. I also know what relevance means.

      1. mad.casual   1 year ago

        I also know what relevance means.

        Either this is a lie or you understand the relevance between knowing those things and reading Reason and knowing those things *by* reading Reason and your first sentence is a lie.

        Lies of omission or commission, dishonest or stupid, your choice.

    3. Dangerangel   1 year ago

      >Fuck this magazine. Fucking disgusting.

      Cute. See you next article, shitheel.

      1. mad.casual   1 year ago

        shitheel.

        You're the one itching to punish a human for the property equivalent of tossing a lost, used, broken piece of furniture in the trash.

        Are you more upset about the dog you never met except through rage-bait article on the internet or because you know way better than he does how other people and animals should be oppressed properly?

        1. Dangerangel   1 year ago

          >You’re the one itching to punish a human for the property equivalent of tossing a lost, used, broken piece of furniture in the trash.

          This is so EDGY and CONTRARIAN it’s really hard for me to take you seriously. So I’m not.

          You have no ground to stand on here. Absolutely none. An animal is not legally or morally equivalent to a sofa. The angry little man doesn't get to talk to others about rage baiting.

          1. MrMxyzptlk   1 year ago

            Property is property. While there are no specific city codes to deal with a sofa and there are such codes to deal with domesticated animals under the law they are both property. If your dog bites the mailman or your sofa falls on the mailman YOU as owner are responcible for the damages.

            The legal aspect is the only relevant angle to discuss. If you want to shove morality into this then explain how a pig is different than a dog. If a hog escapes my farm and is tearing up your garden are you obligated to endanger yourself to stop the hog without killing it?

  10. freedomwriter   1 year ago

    "especially after body camera footage obtained by a local news outlet contradicted the officer and city officials' narrative of events"

    BIG fucking surprise.

  11. MollyGodiva   1 year ago

    There is no way to diagnose rabies by looking at the behavior of an animal. The symptoms of rabies can be caused by other factors, and a rabid animal might not have any symptoms at all. This is well know to anyone who has even brief rabies training.

    tldr: The cop is BSing the rabies reasoning.

    1. mad.casual   1 year ago

      There is no way to diagnose rabies by looking at the behavior of an animal. The symptoms of rabies can be caused by other factors, and a rabid animal might not have any symptoms at all. This is well know to anyone who has even brief rabies training.

      Jesus Fuck. I don’t doubt the cop is BSing it but, as someone who has zero “rabies training” but has dispatched numerous animals diagnosed with rabies, this retardation is going to get people hurt. This is like saying “There is no way to diagnose that someone coughing up blood and hemorrhaging from their other orifices has ebola or some other BBP. These symptoms may be caused by other factors and people with ebola may have no symptoms at all. This is well known to anyone who’s had BBP training.” (as someone who does have BBP/ID training).

      You people really are sick fucks aren’t you?

      1. MollyGodiva   1 year ago

        It is impossible to dispatch an animal diagnosed with rabies, since the only way to diagnosis rabies is on an animal that is already deceased. Go take a rabies course and come back and admit you are wrong.

        1. mad.casual   1 year ago

          Do you think no one has access to YouTube or has seen Old Yeller?

          Do you think no one has taken a 3rd grade English class to understand that “I dispatched an animal that was diagnosed with rabies.” includes “I dispatched an animal that was, subsequently, diagnosed with rabies?”

          “Rabies course” You fuckwits just live to disinform, endanger, and harm people in some of the most inestimably fucking evil ways possible don’t you?

          You make lazy cops that shoot blind, deaf dogs look exceedingly benign.

      2. MrMxyzptlk   1 year ago

        We have leash laws in most places to deal with the difficulty of intuiting the intentions and physical well being of domesticated animals.

        Most leash laws say something to the effect of a dog in a public area or on private property that is unleashed and is unknown to the person is in the wrong and any measures taken to protect life and property are acceptable.

        This is because there are no constants with domesticated animals. Tail waging, barking, head position relatice to its ass, or general disposition mean nothing. The dog in question could just as well be a wild dog with no fear of man as it could be a well trained loved animal.

  12. AT   1 year ago

    I mean, I get it – people who use terms like “furbaby”, demented as that is, are super attached to their conditional love machines. And don’t get me wrong, I love my doggo and would be horribly distraught if someone shot her. But, at the end of the day – objectively speaking – these are property crimes at best.

    Yea, it seems callous to put it that way – but that’s the long and the short of it. Do a calculation of the dog’s market value and pay the guy restitution accordingly.

    That being said – I have zero problem with cops (or anyone else) indiscriminately shooting dogs if we’re talking about pitbulls. Literally, let me be very VERY clear: kill all the pitbulls. No, I’m not joking. I’m not being sarcastic, or ironic, or edgy, or jocular. Find every pitbull on the planet – and, pitbull mixes, just to be sure – and kill. them. all.

    And don’t pay a dime of restitution for it. Pitbull owners deserve that for being stupid reckless horrible people.

    And for all you people who immediately want to say, “It’s not the dog, it’s the owner” – well, something tells me you’re not blaming Teddy’s owner on this one are you.

    1. Dude 2   1 year ago

      Of course, we aren't blaming Teddy's owner. Teddy didn't do anything wrong.

  13. Dude 2   1 year ago

    Similar, not as bad in a way, much worse in another. Recorded in Chicago April 21, 2024, video released May 28, 2024: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XctovkTLBoc

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Review: A Comic Book Villain Runs for Mayor of New York in the New Daredevil Series

Joe Lancaster | From the July 2025 issue

Brickbat: Friends in High Places

Charles Oliver | 6.6.2025 4:00 AM

Is the Supreme Court Really That Divided? The Facts Say No.

Billy Binion | 6.5.2025 5:21 PM

Milton Friedman Disproved Trump's Argument for Tariffs Decades Ago

Joe Lancaster | 6.5.2025 4:35 PM

If Viewers Love PBS So Much, Let Them Pay for It

Robby Soave | 6.5.2025 3:20 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!