He Was Sentenced to a Decade in Prison for Having Unlicensed Weapons
Dexter Taylor is now a "violent felon," even though his hobby was victimless.

A New York City man on Monday was sentenced to a decade in prison after a jury convicted him of a slew of violent felonies. Most intriguing, though, is that there were no victims because there was no violence.
Dexter Taylor, 53, was arrested in 2022 after police raided his home and found several firearms without the state-required licenses. Taylor, who works as a software engineer, had taken an interest in weapons science and started building "ghost guns"—essentially firearms made by nontraditional manufacturers. Despite Taylor's hobby being victimless, Brooklyn District Attorney Eric Gonzalez brought a 37-count indictment against him.
"By assembling guns from kits, unfinished parts, or 3D printed components, those who possess ghost guns evade critically important background checks and registration requirements, and because they have no serial number they are untraceable," he said in a press release at the time. "The surge in ghost guns in our neighborhoods is a major contributor to the violence plaguing our communities and my Office is working tirelessly to stop their proliferation in Brooklyn."
It's difficult to know whether or not the latter claim—that ghost guns are at the root of Brooklyn's gun violence—is true. Beyond dispute, however, is that Taylor did not contribute to those statistics because he didn't harm anyone. Nevertheless, a jury convicted him of two counts of second-degree criminal possession of a weapon; three counts of third-degree criminal possession of a weapon; five counts of criminal possession of a firearm; unlawful possession of pistol ammunition; and violating the prohibition on unfinished frames or receivers. Many of those charges are violent felonies under New York law, even though they're essentially paperwork violations.
Especially ironic is that Gonzalez promised to lead "the most progressive D.A.'s office in the country." Ensuring that a man serves substantial prison time for crimes that hurt no one does not strike me as particularly progressive. The decadelong sentence should "send a message to anyone who, like this defendant, would try to evade critically important background checks and registration requirements to manufacture and stockpile these dangerous weapons," said Gonzalez on Monday.
It certainly sends a message, although not the one Gonzalez thinks it does. It tells people in New York that their judiciary may be more preoccupied with performative prosecution than actually keeping their communities safe.
Perusing Gonzalez's other recent wins is instructive. They include securing a seven-year sentence for a man who repeatedly sexually assaulted a young girl, a three-to-nine-year sentence for a man convicted of second-degree manslaughter, and a three-and-a-half-to-seven-year sentence for a woman who stole almost $1 million from nine people. All of those crimes had victims. And yet all of the perpetrators will still spend significantly less time in prison than Taylor will.
This isn't a novel case. In November, LaShawn Craig, another Brooklynite, fired his gun in self-defense after entering his apartment and finding another man inside. While prosecutors deemed it a justified shooting, they brought several weapons charges against him because the gun he used to protect himself was not licensed by the state. In June, over in Queens, Charles Foehner shot and killed a man who was attempting to mug him. Law enforcement agreed that shooting was also in self-defense. And then they brought so many weapons charges against him that, if convicted on all of them, he would die in prison—far more time behind bars than his assailant would have received if he'd lived.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
2A says New York violated his rights.
Requiring a license should be right out. License for carry is bad enough. Requiring a license merely to own a weapon is even worse.
The only thing that moves the needle on this for me is if he was selling/distributing the weapons and/or if they were used in crimes. Without such circumstances, New York violated his rights through a slew of unconstitutional laws.
What spurred the raid? I think details are being omitted here to mask a messier situation as a pure 2A concern
I've read some other things about this. It seems like he's just a kind of nerdy guy who likes guns and thought building kit guns from 80% lowers sounded like a fun hobby.
A $40,000 fun hobby, apparently.
New York doesn’t respect anyone’s rights.
They respect the rights of obese Twitter Dem supporters by using prosecutions against Dem opponents as an election tampering tool.
Except 2A doesn't exist in New York, the judge said that.
Is this like that sovereign citizen thing?
Then neighter does the right to life. Kill the judge, he family, his employees, and his friends
Like everyone else here, I agree that these laws are unconstitutional and immoral.
This man, and the man shooting the intruder would be free men today if they had only followed the illegal and immoral laws and registered/licensed/ papered the weapons.
New York would have given them the required permits if they had jumped through the hoops.
The builder could even have engraved proper serial numbers, applied for an FFL and started selling the home builds.
Seems like complying with the rules would have been a better strategy
I'm not so sure that getting the permits in NY would be a sure thing.
Closer to an impossibility unless you're rich and famous or know the right guy.
If you have to say "Big Brother May I?" to do something, it is not a right.
So what are you a "Doc" of exactly? It's not anything involving life or death is it?
And Liz actually stays and has a home and bears young in this shitty place???
She needs to have a featurette to the Roundup entitled "New York From A Safe Distance Far The Fuck Away."
Americans have been building their own firearms long before the second amendment.
Ensuring that a man serves substantial prison time for crimes that hurt no one does not strike me as particularly progressive.
Well, silly you for thinking that "progressive" means anything other than "shit that self-identified progressives believe". Which definitely includes punishing people harshly for not going along with their gun control/banning schemes.
Progressive simply means progressing towards communism.
You mean communism or Marxism such ass "Web sites don't belong to web site owners; They below to he or she who has the BIGGEST hissy fit and DEMANDS to own and cuntroll YOUR web site?" How is Marxism working for YOU, Pervfect Hissy-Shit-Fit Thrower?
Here Here
I’m looking forward to the day he is freed and sues NY for millions of dollars. SCOTUS needs to get moving on 2A cases and free this man!
Well, at least he wasn't mislabeling legal fees. He'd then be looking at a really long prison term.
Robert.
Should have just taken up burglary or mugging as a hobby, and avoided the time in jail.
Even distributing porn to minors as a business in Texas without age verification only gets you a $10K fine and/or your business shut down.
If one must ask permission to exercise a constitutional right then it is hardly a right.
Where in NY do I apply for my license to exercise my right to freedom of conscience?
'Beyond dispute, however, is that Taylor did not contribute to those statistics because he didn't harm anyone.'
How dare you! Sensitive people everywhere suffer fatal emotional harm just thinking about all the guns running around loose, and "ghost" guns are the worstest kind. Plus anyone who defies state laws about guns adds even more emotional trauma for those that need the state to supply a curated comfort reality.
No offense to Dexter Taylor, I'm 100% on his side, but he comes across as awfully white privileged about this raid.
@3:00 in the Twitter video in the first link he's detailing about how when he woke up and realized the raid was happening he thought they had the wrong place. That it never occurred to him that NYC would take such an interest in someone sitting in their basement quietly crafting rifles and pistols.
Bitch, have you never heard of Randy Weaver or the Branch Davidians or Dennis Tuttle or Regina Nicholas or Philando Castille? Have you never seen a Bill Burr sketch?
This guy seems to have violated the law; a jury and prosecutors held him to account for the unlawful conduct; and Billy Binion apparently didn't like it.
He violated an illegal law.
Immoral. It requires coercion.
Let's hope there is an appeal.
Dear Reverend--
Your disdain of liberty and sobriety has been noted.
Piss off,
Dia
I'm beginning to suspect that the Reverend is a - you know - troll. No one could be that ignorant, stupid and obvious without posting as a false flag to provoke flaming. Don't feed the trolls!
Right-wing slack-jaws would have been terribly conflicted had this asshole been making his unlawful weapons as part of a pro-Palestinian, anti-war-crime protest.
An unjust law is no law at all, Artie, especially one that violates the right to construct and own the means of defending Life, Liberty, and Property.
If you don't like people such as Dexter Taylor living the life of a free individual, then get back to your rat-cage, Klinger!
I’ve been wondering when Reason.com would say something about this case. Baffingly, this article doesn’t even mention the most bizarre moment – when Judge Abena Darkeh said this to the defense:
“Do not bring the Second Amendment into this courtroom. It doesn’t exist here. So you can’t argue Second Amendment. This is New York.”
There appear to be several interesting aspects of this case which the Reason article doesn't mention. Another example:
The linked RedState article has this in the first section: "Dexter Taylor is a 52-year-old native New Yorker and a software engineer who enjoys building things. When he discovered the world of gun manufacturing, he believed he had found a new hobby and possibly a small business opportunity."
Was the prosecution motivated by the defendant's hinted-at motivation to sell the weapons he made? There's no question he knew what he was doing was illegal, and in a just world it would not have been illegal, but I'm slightly less sympathetic to someone who intentionally engages in illegal activities to make money. You don't have to like drug prohibition to dislike drug dealers...
There it is. Distribution of weapons changes the entire case. It doesn't change that NY is using a bunch of unconstitutional gun laws to prosecute him, but it certainly increases the state's interest and puts the denial of harm in question
Was he charged with distribution of weapons? If not, how does it change anything?
He wasn't charged with distribution.
Maybe they couldn't find any receipts when they busted down his door...
I'd be interested in knowing what he spent the $40k on, exactly.
And how he got caught (just in case, you know)...
Ironically enough, the guns will more likely end up on the streets as a result of the authorities confiscating them and selling them for bribes.
“”hinted-at motivation””
His motivation has nothing to do with it, NY democrats hate guns. Period. They hate ghost guns especially. They need some ghost gun prosecutions to show they will not stand for it. This gives them the chance to show how tough they will be on ghost guns.
How did they find him? If all he was doing was buying parts and working on them in his home, it would have had to have been loose lips, a tip or maybe something to do with the feds monitoring his purchases...
They probably found him through credit card company informants, or, like New York does with fireworks, they post undercover agents at out of state (Pa.) gun shows and watch for who with New York plates buys stuff at the tables that are NY illegal. They run the plates and later come a knockin', all kitted up for WWIII.
Note to whomever: Cash is king, park far away from gun shows, and give up aversion to masks.
I got no problem with drug dealers per se. And laws prohibiting private gun sales are bullshit too. As long as he wasn't selling anything to people he knew to be criminals I don't give a shit.
Thankfully he did not own any unlicensed woodchippers.
Bill you complete fucking retard. Progressive is a version of Marxist. And all Marxists are evil retarded subhuman cancers. All of Marxism is based on jealousy and the desire to punish those you think have harmed you
I don't particularly care what motivates people to want to harm me, but for you, that's all that matters.
Especially ironic is that Gonzalez promised to lead "the most progressive D.A.'s office in the country."
Even more than Kamala's?
SHHHH DON'T BRING THAT UP.
You do know that would-be prospects for ropes and pick-up trucks can manufacture weapons as well, right?
And that archery weapons like crossbows are already made without registration numbers, right?
Your best bet is to stick to oil-wrestling with KAR.
Don't know what any of that had to do with my comment, but I get it - you're probably stoned.
It doesn't have anything to do with comments here, but what you've said elsewhere.
And no, I'm not stoned. I'm waiting for you and KAR to oil-wrestle. You both know you want to...
Sure you’re not stoned? You sound pretty stoned. You don't even seem to know where you are, what you're doing, or why you're doing it here.
"It tells people in New York that their judiciary may be more preoccupied with performative prosecution than actually keeping their communities safe."
That message has already been sent loudly and repetitively with the endless Trump prosecutions on the flimsiest of grounds (or no grounds whatsoever).
Shit, this is nothing. Try to misclassify legal fees in NYC; now that carries serious jail time.
Don't worry, Trump will never do 10 years.