Iran Attacks Israel
Plus: Trump's trial, MMA fighter trots out Mises, the forgotten canceling of Brendan Eich, and more...

Iran's direct hit: On Saturday night, Iran launched 300 drones and missiles at Israel; the vast majority were intercepted. The damage appears to be minimal, but a few dozen people have reported injuries and some damage has been sustained at an Israeli military base in the Negev Desert.
The attack was a retaliation for an April 1 Israeli strike in Syria that struck an Iranian consulate complex and killed three senior commanders and four officers reportedly responsible for helping to dictate Iran's military strategy. "Israeli officials said the building was an outpost of the Revolutionary Guards, making it a legitimate military target," per The New York Times.
Israel knew Iran's retaliation was coming. In preparation for Iran's possible move, The Wall Street Journal reports, the U.S. military had repositioned several warships, including one destroyer reportedly carrying the Aegis missile-defense system. On Friday, President Joe Biden was asked about Iran's timing, and whether he had any message for its leaders. "My expectation is sooner than later," he said, in response to the first question. And he minced no words on the second, saying to Iran's government: "Don't."
Israel mostly used the Arrow 3 defense system, which halts ballistic missiles outside of the planet's atmosphere, as opposed to the more frequently used Iron Dome. Allies helped shoot down missiles and drones, including U.S. fighter jets—which destroyed 70-plus drones—and the repositioned warships, which shot down several missiles.
Now Israel is weighing its next move. Aggressive retaliation could increase the possibility of all-out war in the Middle East—which would include U.S. involvement in some form. Though a direct attack, not through proxies, is alarming, Iran did relatively little damage, possibly by design.
"I think Iran is very concerned about what comes next if they were too effective," Gen. Joseph L. Votel, a former leader of the U.S. military's Central Command, told The New York Times. "The early notification of what they were doing seems a little interesting to me."
Some Israeli military sources have pushed back on this idea, though: 300 missiles and drones was at the far end of the expected range, and Iran did not necessarily expect the Arrow 3 system to work as well as it did.
Iran sent hit men after journalists: At the end of March, the Persian journalist Pouria Zeraati, lead anchor for Iran International, was attacked outside of his home in southwestern London by men who appear to have been sent by the government of Iran, angered by Zeraati's critiques of the regime and his platforming of opposition figures and Mahsa protest leaders.
"With all the murder and mayhem that the Islamic Republic causes inside and outside its borders, the thankfully unsuccessful attempts on the lives of Rushdie and my friends from Iran International might seem secondary. But the fact that such attacks could take place on Western soil, in leafy Wimbledon or sedate Chautauqua, makes them especially harrowing," writes Arash Azizi for The Atlantic. "Iran's regime clearly feels threatened by the journalism of exiled reporters who break its monopoly on truth."
Iran faced domestic turmoil over the course of 2022 and 2023 following the death in government custody of Mahsa Amini. The morality police had beaten Amini for wearing her hijab improperly, and her death set off protests throughout the country, many of which were brutally suppressed. Internet blackouts were among the tools deployed to end dissent. But the recent targeting of expat journalists, on Western soil, indicates how much the regime fears, and seeks to eradicate, the spread of information.
Trump on trial: The first criminal trial of a former American president commences today in lower Manhattan, with jury selection.
Alvin Bragg, the Manhattan district attorney, has charged former President Donald Trump with 34 felonies related to falsifying records of hush money payments to porn actress Stormy Daniels. Trump is expected to appear most days in court. For the next two or so weeks, the jury will be selected—a bit of a tough task in blue New York, and with such a polarizing figure as Donald Trump. Judge Juan Merchan has imposed a gag order, so the former president will not be permitted to verbally go after jurors, prosecutors, witnesses, or the judge's family.
If convicted, Trump could face up to four years in prison. His other pending criminal cases are all delayed, but he has multiple legal ordeals to jump through, not to mention some $500 million in civil judgments to fork over. Oh, and he's still running for president.
Expect spectacle, several months of runtime, and—if you drive into Manhattan a lot, as I do—some miserable traffic. Do not expect voters' opinions to change much at all based on the verdict.
Scenes from Corpus Christi: This past weekend, I moderated the Libertarian Party of Texas' presidential debate between four candidates—Chase Oliver, Lars Mapstead, Mike ter Maat, and Michael Rectenwald. My dad, who lives in Austin, served as my chauffeur and graciously endured his first Libertarian Party event. Thanks, Dad! (Also: Peep the RFK Jr. fanfare in the lobby.)


QUICK HITS
- More Reasoners in Texas this past weekend: Nick Gillespie did the Lord's work and defended the value of immigration opposite Ann Coulter and Sohrab Ahmari. It's a dirty job, but someone's gotta do it:
Had a phenomenal time in #Dallas last night at the @TheFIREorg / @TheFP debate about shutting America's borders with @AnnCoulter, @SohrabAhmari, @bariweiss, and @cenkuygur! You want to know something great about America? Only one person on the stage has a family history dating… pic.twitter.com/nm0sxqVQ8V
— Nick Gillespie (@nickgillespie) April 12, 2024
- Andrew Beck wrote in First Things about the early cancel-culture case of Brendan Eich, "who ten years ago was attacked and chased out of Mozilla, a company he co-founded, for taking private civic action based upon his quiet Christian faith." Eich was "a visionary technologist whose work had made the web a more accessible, free, and enjoyable experience for everyone," but his donations against the same-sex marriage initiative in California led to career ruin.
- Last week, Chicago police officers shot and killed a 26-year-old black man named Dexter Reed, who had reportedly shot first at them, during a traffic stop. A gun was recovered from Reed's car, and one of the responding police officers was allegedly injured by one of the shots Reed fired. It doesn't look like your standard police killing of an innocent man, but some media organizations and activists have been leaving out context about what transpired between Reed and the officers.
- CBS is, hilariously, launching a misinformation-fighting unit called CBS News Confirmed, helmed by Melissa Mahtani. It takes only a brief glance at Mahtani's X feed to get a sense of just how much of a garden variety liberal she is. I wonder whether obvious partisanship should be disqualifying for ombudsman-type roles; it's not like misinformation/disinformation reporters, units, and czars have a great track record.
- "If you care about your fucking country, read Ludwig von Mises and the six lessons of the Austrian economic school, motherfuckers," said Brazilian MMA fighter Renato Moicano over the weekend after yet another UFC win.
- A Freaky Friday situation in the works: "Polls show former President Donald Trump is ascendant with the youngest bloc of the electorate, even leading President Joe Biden in some surveys, as less-engaged young voters spurn Biden," reports Politico. "Meanwhile, Biden is stronger with seniors than he was four years ago, even as his personal image is significantly diminished since he was elected last time."
- Honestly, the young-people-try-choking thing doesn't shock me. But I am shocked that even the Midwesterners are down.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
On Saturday night, Iran launched 300 drones and missiles at Israel; the vast majority were intercepted.
As far as face-saving actions go, this didn't save a whole lot of face.
Majority intercepted? Fake news!
Note: this applies to both missiles are reported in Tehran and illegal immigrants as reported in D.C.
Jews are committing a holocaust in Gaza. This video demonstrates how they carried it out.
It is the best compilation of evidence to date that October 7 was an inside job coordinated by Israel.
https://richardgage911.substack.com/p/new-documentary-on-gaza-october-7
The video proves that Israel, funded, coordinated and enabled the October 7 attacks.
It shows that Israel opened the gate to welcome trucks carrying Hamas through the wall.
It shows how Israel not only ignored repeated warnings from their many surveillance sources but withdrew all defences from the wall and emptied their military bases just hours before the attack and had ZERO response for more than 5 hours.
It shows and proves that the IDF attacked the concert goers and the kibbutz’s with Apache helicopters and tanks.
It shows that they sacrificed dozens of their IDF forces to blame Hamas.
It shows that only handfuls of Hamas soldiers wandered for hours through the evacuated areas looking for soldiers to fight but finding none.
It shows that the hostages that were taken by Hamas said they were treated well.
It shows that Israel has funded Hamas with billions in cash in suitcases in the backs of cars.
No amount of propaganda can undo the fact that Jews are currently committing a holocaust in Gaza and are denying it even though they’re on trial for genocide today in the United Nations international court of justice.
Biden is funding the genocide making him and the US complicit. How does that make you feel?
Netanyahu is responsible for telling the IDF to commit genocide by referencing the Jewish biblical genocide against women and children with the story of AMALEK. Clearly inciting genocide. With over 20,000 non combatant women and children intentionally targeted and killed and IDF soldiers on record rejoicing about it referencing amalek, the effect of Netanyahus instructions are clear.
Israeli defence minister Yoav Gallant said Israel was fighting “human animals” and that they will be “starved of food and water” which Israel has done and continues to do.
Amichay Eliyahu, the minister for heritage, who suggested dropping a nuclear bomb on Gaza; Israel isn’t supposed to have nuclear weapons. Saddam Hussein was hung for crimes against humanity and he didn’t even have WMD much less threaten to use them.
The country’s mainly ceremonial president, Isaac Herzog, who described Palestinians as “an entire nation out there that is responsible” demonstrates the genocidal intention.
These statements in combination with their actual execution clearly meets the UN definition and criteria for genocide aka holocaust.
As the US defies its signatory obligations to the UN genocide convention by sending bombs, money and troops to support Israel’s genocide in Gaza, its role on the world’s stage will dramatically decrease and it will become an isolated pariah like North Korea.
This is refuted.
Man. I really do like your standards.
That was Israel’s response to the international court of justice.
It didn’t work for them either.
I refute your claims.
How do you refute an idiot?
Based on Misek's insanity and "logic" I have decided he is a 15 year old Nazi.
It’s easy to refute idiots. I do it all the time.
It’s difficult to have a rational discussion with idiots, like you demonstrate yourselves to be.
As this is often the case, I’m satisfied with the optics.
You don't refute anyone. You fool yourself with your own myopia.
I have refuted any and all idiotic claims that I am a “Nazi”, by issuing the as yet unmet challenge to prove that I either am or advocate National Socialism. None who use that term in a feeble attempt at ad hominem have ever met the challenge.
By demonstrating that those who make the claim have Zero evidence to support it I have met the criteria for the definition of “refuting” the claim.
I refute idiots, like you, all the time.
The people of the Iranian Diaspora (and possibly also Iranians still stuck in Iran?) are standing against the Mullahs in Iran and with Israel! Hurray!
Iranians, expats run online campaign against attack on Israel
Story by Aakash Sharma • 14h
https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/world/iranians-expats-run-online-campaign-against-attack-on-israel/ar-BB1lExnZ out
All of these fine people stand against the Totalitarian Theocratic Mullahs that you support, Herr Misek!
And, hey! The Iranisns are the original and real "Aryan" people, so when they tell you the Mullahs and by extension, you, suck, you really need to listen! And also listen to them when they also tell you to:
Fuck Off, Nazi!
Israel is on trial in the ICJ for committing genocide in Gaza.
Any nation, particularly signatories to the UN Convention, who are aiding Israel are not only complicit in the genocide but are defying their vows to the UN and the world at large.
Israel initiated the use of force by attacking Iran first.
I don’t and will never support genocide.
The fact that you do, demonstrates what you are.
Iran attacked Israel's Embassy in Argentina in 1992 and Argentina's Jewish Community Center in 1994 and has backed Hamas and Hezbollah attacks on Israel for decades since. The Mullahs in Iran have long had it coming!
And the United Nations has consistently backed enemies of both the U.S. and Israel, even though the United Nations is on our soil and gets our tax dollars!
Fuck Off, Ignorant, Dumb-As-Dirt Nazi!
Not quite as peaceful as WWIII, though.
And he minced no words on the second, saying to Iran's government: "Don't."
How much redder did Joe need to make that line?
It’s more effective when he says it three times.
Or whispers.
Like Beetlejuice?
Isn’t that “Lori, Lori, Lori”?
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
He said it to Putin too before the invasion. Maybe he's using it backwards?
The first criminal trial of a former American president commences today in lower Manhattan, with jury selection.
All those unbiased lower Manhattanites.
Push to make the jury all cops and firemen
So, when it comes to information on the Russia-Ukraine war, which sources of information do conservatives trust the most?
1. The military
2. Right-wing media
Not, of course, the people who are actually in Ukraine observing the conflict first hand.
https://thehill.com/policy/international/4594059-republicans-trust-trump-on-ukraine-more-than-twice-as-much-as-journalists-who-are-there-poll
Trust the government!
I think we have to conclude that they want to be lied to. They want to have their beliefs and feelings reinforced by the media that they watch. News should not be thought provoking or informing, it should be reaffirming.
Who doesn’t love a good echo chamber?
Hey. Good for you admitting you prefer an echo chamber. Like how you and Jeff use ad hominem to dismiss any facts harmful to your narratives.
https://reason.com/2024/03/09/the-future-of-immigration-is-privatization/?comments=true#comment-10479818
Or
sarcasmic 2 months ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
I don’t consider links from you guys to be information. I’ve clicked a couple and never found them useful. It has to be from, or confirmed by, someone other than a raving right-wing lunatic for me to give it consideration.
*shrug*
Jesse, your sources are, in general, garbage. They are junk food for the mind.
Why don't you tell us again how you think The Federalist isn't an opinion site, but delivers "straight news".
Defends his ad hominem attacks with an ad hominem. Lol.
Classic
Lying Jeffy, why don't you tell us who his sources are and why they are "garbage".
Because there are DNC politrucks like you patrolling the comments, all of us are generally careful to use sources that you would be hard pressed to attack.
For example yesterday, when you tried to discredit a statement about AOC crying after approval of funding assistance for the Iron Dome, I had to trot out a report from the New York Times, a DNC party organ, to verify the statement and show everyone what you are.
This new narrative that we’re solely using “right-wing” sources is as lazy as it is dishonest.
But then Hey, you’re Lying Jeffy.
Shorter Jesse: "Why won't you treat my junk food sources as equivalent to a well-balanced diet of healthy information choices?"
And again! Lol.
Jeff. You think they are garbage because your a leftist moron and only accept leftist sources. And then even post opinion pieces praising Dark Brandon while making these claims.
Notice you never actually attack the information. It is outright dismissal based on source.
Youre literally admitting to preferring a bubble. Fucking hilarious.
The irony is I read your and shrikes sources. Often to point out their flaws. You just yell ad hominem attacks. Fucking hilarious.
They are garbage because, more often than not:
(1) They mix opinion and facts to an extent that it is difficult to tell the difference
(2) They are self-referential, citing other parts of the echo chamber to "validate" their own biases
Once again, you are mad because I won't pretend your junk food is equivalent to a well-balanced meal.
You are again not using any evidence. Reason also utilizes 2, so they must be bad. Yet youre here. As for 1)... you post dark Brandon opinion pieces lol.
You can make up whatever justifications you want. But you simply never refute the facts presented. Because you have no capability for honest discussion or analysis. You simply dismiss inconvenient facts.
In the last few months I've shown you AP and others also mixing opinion and facts. It is also the primary criticisms of NYT and WAPO from their own journalists fired. NPR is going through those criticisms now.
These are sites you use. Yet you ignore those criticisms. You focus on your narratives as justification to dismiss things you don't like. A form of cognitive bias.
It is hilarious how often you get exposed with this.
As for 1)… you post dark Brandon opinion pieces lol.
And that is you using a fallacy. That I once cited one article that said something favorable about Dark Brandon has absolutely no bearing on the worthiness of you citing right-wing opinion pieces as if they were fact day after day, routinely and repetitively.
Once again tell us one more time how The Federalist is not an opinion site but posts straight news.
Why are they worthless jeff? Explain without generalizations. Does opinion around a set of facts change the facts? Why do you exclude the sites I mentioned? Political preferencr seems to be the answer.
You’ve also done way more than one daily beast article lol.
I have never said The Federalist does only straight news. Neither does the AP, waPo, NYT, Reuters etc. And all of them have selection bias. The lie here is The Federalist has only opinion or that the opinion disqualifies the acts justifying their opinions. It is an odd claim, but expected from a sophist. They are also less than 5% of my sources. So good work I guess?
Now tell me why facts aren’t relevant because someone has an opinion of said facts?
Or are you too dumb to notice i don't quote opinions but the evidence? You just hate the evidence.
Here is one example taken from the front page of The Federalist:
https://thefederalist.com/2024/04/15/bidenbucks-make-zuckbucks-look-like-chump-change/
This whole article is just a giant screed against Biden and his Executive Order 14019, which directs federal agencies to encourage people to vote. It makes a lot of paranoid claims about this EO, how it is about trying to federalize elections or how it is about voter turnout for left-wing voters only. It engages in a whole lot of fallacies, such as the genetic fallacy: the idea for EO 14019 apparently originated from some left-wing group Demos, therefore the whole idea is bad and a devilish plot. It is not even attempting to fairly inform readers. It is trying to push a narrative, that Biden and Democrats are seizing power and tampering with election integrity.
I have never said The Federalist does only straight news. Neither does the AP, waPo, NYT, Reuters etc. And all of them have selection bias.
This is a type of nirvana fallacy: that because no one is perfect, all are equally bad. That is not true, we are capable of discerning between "pretty good" and "truly awful". AP, Reuters are pretty good. Breitbart is terrible.
Does opinion around a set of facts change the facts?
It changes how the reader is told to interpret the facts.
So you use a citation i didnt post. Then you claim the facts provided are bad because reasons without refuting the facts used.
You ignore the facts in the article like the federal agencies not providing how they execute the order. We have many examples and articles of states using the order to justify registration in heavy dem urban centers such as Wisconsin. But it still doesn’t change the facts the opinion is based on. You provide no facts to prove their opinion is garbage, you just dismiss it.
Now do you have an example from a link I have actually used?
It changes how the reader is told to interpret the facts.
Do you have evidence for this or did you submit opinion as a fact so I should just dismiss it.
Youre doing well today jeff.
You ignore the facts in the article like the federal agencies not providing how they execute the order.
I didn't dispute that fact. Why is it relevant? Perhaps an actual NEWS story would put this fact into context. Such as, for instance: "The federal agencies did not immediately disclose how they are implementing this executive order. However, agencies do not routinely disclose such information when implementing most executive orders, so that is par for the course." OH NO, that is not what we got. We got that the agencies are "stonewalling".
This entire article is just repeating the House Republican narrative on the matter. It's basically just a restatement of what the House Republicans wrote in their letter to the DOJ on this matter. Do you realize this? That this is just a propaganda article on behalf of Team Red?
We have many examples and articles of states using the order to justify registration in heavy dem urban centers such as Wisconsin.
We do? Is this cited and documented in the article? Oh wait, it isn't.
I guess Trolling Jeffy is today's moniker. You're not citing any of your claims or giving examples, just squealing out accusations.
Here's the thing. Nobody needs "right-wing" news to tell them your party lies and that you disseminate propaganda, it's self evident. And I'm sure you noticed that we usually cite lefty's like Taibbi, Greenwald, Weiss, etc. and almost never "right-wing" news like Brietbart or National Review.
But I guess Lying Jeffy is going to lie.
He is leaning into his strength.
Those guys aren’t leftist enough!
Of course he’s going to lie. Fatfuck has never been even a little bit honest. That he still posts here is beyond pathetic. Like Sarc, he’s been discredited literally hundreds of times. Maybe over a thousand by now.
Nobody needs “right-wing” news to tell them your party lies and that you disseminate propaganda, it’s self evident.
Libertarians lie and disseminate propaganda? Huh. Someone tell KMW about this.
And I’m sure you noticed that we usually cite lefty’s like Taibbi, Greenwald, Weiss, etc.
These types of sources are also problematic, but for other reasons: they tend to be sloppy and opinionated rather than reporting facts and presenting multiple perspectives.
Either way, whether you read Breitbart all day or whether you listen to Greenwald all day, you are not getting the full picture. You are living in a bubble and not hearing alternative perspectives. Which is exactly how you want it: you want your biases to be reinforced and affirmed, rather than challenged.
This is rich considering you continue to claim the lab leak theory is less plausible and it was justified to censor that opinion.
Again. How do facts change? You keep attacking the source instead of the facts. Lol.
I love how you claim your preferred sources always tell the full picture yet often dont have the facts presented on the sites you hate. Weird huh?
Was it CNN who told everyone only journalists could see the primary evidence from the Hunter laptop?
Youre a fucking clown jeff. A really dumb and pathetic clown.
you continue to claim the lab leak theory is less plausible and it was justified to censor that opinion.
This entire sentence is a lie. You know this, right?
Again. How do facts change? You keep attacking the source instead of the facts. Lol.
You're asking me to accept 'facts' that come from garbage sources. You might as well be asking me to accept 'facts' from the old crazy man yelling on the street corner. Sure even the crazy guy might get a few facts right from time to time, but why should I spend the effort or the energy to listen to his crazy ramblings to MAYBE learn something, when there are lots of more credible sources out there where I can learn a lot more?
Was it CNN who told everyone only journalists could see the primary evidence from the Hunter laptop?
OMG CNN once did something wrong! Therefore AUTOMATICALLY that means everything on The Federalist becomes automatically true and correct! Is that how it works?
Lol. It is not a lie. You continued to claim wet market was more plausible in 2020 despite all the facts you've been given showing it was never more plausible.
You can't help but misconstrue your arguments when they are shot down. It is pathetic.
In other words, unless the source cited is one that routinely argues points that Chemjeff agrees with, it's not a source that should be used/cited.
That's my parsing of what you are saying. I'm sure you'll argue you have some more noble standard than that, but that's how it's coming across to me.
If someone cites a "right wing" source, it's to be thrown out entirely, regardless of the point it makes or the sources cited in the source. Sounds like the genetic fallacy you like to accuse others of making.
If Chemjeff quotes a "left wing" source, it's to be accepted, because they do "real journalism."
you want your biases to be reinforced and affirmed, rather than challenged.
You are doing this right now by saying you won't even read any sources that you don't like because the just reinforce the right's wrong message.
Do you not see how hypocritical this is?
These types of sources are also problematic, but for other reasons: they tend to be sloppy and opinionated rather than reporting facts and presenting multiple perspectives.
This is why we call you Lying Jeffy. No citations, no examples of where Greenwald got it wrong. Just weaselly accusations with absolutely no basis.
“Either way, whether you read Breitbart all day or whether you listen to Greenwald all day, you are not getting the full picture. You are living in a bubble and not hearing alternative perspectives.”
The sheer stupidity of this statement is amazing. The Democratic party owns the corporate media lock, stock and barrel.
All day long DNC propaganda is pushed on almost every news channel, being burbled out by by late night talk show hosts, regurgitated by Hollywood celebs, and spouted by sportscasters on ESPN.
Americans live in a veritable soup of your narratives and yet here you are squeaking that they are bubble boys like your blue state bien pensants.
In other words, unless the source cited is one that routinely argues points that Chemjeff agrees with, it’s not a source that should be used/cited.
No. The source has to have some reasonable standards of credibility. Guess what, I don't read Daily Kos either. Why? Because it's garbage. I don't read Twitter, it's garbage. There's a huge amount of garbage out there and I am not interested in sifting through mountains of garbage trying to find the one nugget of value. IN GENERAL, opinion-based sites are not to be trusted when it comes to trying to become well informed. Because that is not their mission - their mission is to push a narrative, not to inform the reader. There are a few exceptions IMO and I think Reason is one of those exceptions. But the Federalist? C'mon, the entire thing is a pile of right-wing opinionated garbage.
If someone cites a “right wing” source, it’s to be thrown out entirely, regardless of the point it makes or the sources cited in the source.
If someone cites a "right wing" source, it is to be taken with a huge grain of salt. And my experience is, they can't be trusted. Because their reputation is shit. How many times does a source have to lie to you before you stop trusting them? "Oh, the last 100 articles I read on Federalist, I could easily spot the fallacies and narratives and where they got the facts wrong. But maybe the 101st article will be flawless! Who knows!"
If Chemjeff quotes a “left wing” source, it’s to be accepted, because they do “real journalism.”
No – if I cite a source like AP, or Reuters, or DW, or BBC, or some news organization that actually has standards and a reputation to uphold and which at least attempts to present multiple perspectives in the stories that they write – not always successfully, but at least they give it a shot – they deserve more credibility and standing than the random blogger vomiting his mental diarrhea onto a blog or tweet. It doesn't necessarily mean that the random blogger is wrong, but why should I wade through all the nonsense and garbage reasoning and fallacies and opinionated paranoid drivel in order to try to find the one nugget of redeeming value?
you won’t even read any sources that you don’t like because the just reinforce the right’s wrong message.
No that isn't what I'm saying. I am not saying that right-wing sources are suspect because their messages shouldn't be reinforced. I am saying that right-wing sources are suspect because their reputation is garbage.
(1) They mix opinion and facts to an extent that it is difficult to tell the difference
(2) They are self-referential, citing other parts of the echo chamber to “validate” their own biases
Just like your precious "experts" and "trusted news sources".
That's (D)ifferent!
Yes, we all understand your strategy here: exaggerate the times when experts are wrong, to push your demagogic appeals.
Yes, we all understand your strategy here: exaggerate the times when experts are wrong, to push your demagogic appeals.
"This strategy to point out all the times the self-styled 'experts' fucked up instead of taking everything they say at face value is pushing demagogic appeals."
“….to an extent that it is difficult to tell the difference.”
Thank goodness you’re here to sort it all out for us, Jeff.
Haha. What a doosh.
Isn't attacking the source, rather than the information or argument, pretty much textbook ad-hom?
Yeap.
Facts don’t change because opinion was added around the facts. Jeff believes it does but only if a conservative news source.
He also refuses to admit there is selection bias in one his preferred sites choose to write about. Meh.
The genetic (not ad hominem) fallacy is attacking the source in order to disprove a claim. That is not what I'm doing. I'm not saying "Jesse's claim is false because it came from The Federalist". I'm simply saying that Jesse's preferred list of sources are generally garbage sources regardless of what the claims are.
Why are the facts that The Federalist uses garbage jeff? Yes. You are using an ad hominem retard. And you seem dead focused on just one site. Two if you count your breitbart above which never gets posted here. Your bias is exposed. Your rationalizing your bias as valid is just fucking hilarious. You post daily beast, just security, WPATH, and leftist sites.
Even NPRs own journalists are now admitting a bias but you continue to ignore it. Again. Your idiocy is fucking hilarious.
Do you even understand what an opinion piece is? The purpose is not to inform, but to persuade. They do that by shaping facts into a believable narrative that they want the reader to try to adopt. That is not the same as presenting multiple perspectives and letting the reader make up his/her own mind. That is, instead, lying to the reader by omission.
Your bias is exposed.
I do not accept The Federalist as a news site. Guilty as charged.
You post daily beast, just security, WPATH, and leftist sites.
What does any of that have to do with YOUR behavior? Are you saying that you are justified in trying to present opinion as fact because other people here try to do the same thing?
Even NPRs own journalists are now admitting a bias
What does NPR's bias have to do with The Federalist's bias?
Jeff. Poor obese Jeffrey.
I'm not the one using blanket denials of websites based on your own behaviors. That is you.
I provide my own counter facts to your resources. I dont just dismiss them. See comment to shrike below.
This is about YOUR behavior. As you're the one doing it buddy. And trying to justify it. Only you are doing this.
I provide my own counter facts to your resources.
lol, you repeat narratives.
Nice if you to admit you like the echo chamber.
Pro-Soviet MAGA is all in for Vlad.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Is there anything you aren’t retarded about?
He's pretty cunning when it comes to children.
Seeing as he’s the dumbest motherfucker to post here, I’m gonna go with: no.
So how's that "disintegration" of Russia coming along? The one you assured us was well underway over a year ago?
Russia is disintegrating. They are near impoverishment. Biden laid the hammer on them. I can’t wait for Putin to be shot in the head.
Do you have any capacity for embarrassment? Is there a single aspect of your nonstop 3+ years of Biden cheerleading that you look back at and say "Hmmmm, maybe I shouldn't have written that"?
#DefendBidenAtAllCosts
It is working very well for Russia who has a growing economy during war. Ironically a lot of it on energy prices exploding under Biden who has limited increased production domestically.
https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/infographics/impact-sanctions-russian-economy/
Lame
Another idiotic proclamation from the subnormal pedophile.
And Ukraine shot down 200 of the 100 drones sent by the evil Russkies.
Putin today is leading the "whites" against Zelinsky (the new Trotsky to the global leftists who control most western nations these days and the media) who is the leader of the "reds." Just like the Russian revolution, both sides have little concern for liberty. It isn't our business anyway. Who cares about another eastern european war albeit this one to settle some land issues from the fall of the USSR.
It isn't surprising the leaders of pushing US involvement are all former Russian/Eastern European types who have some old-world grudge against Russia (they never got over Trotsky losing to Stalin and what the Czar did to their ancestors).
Objective news is impossible.
The media has bathed itself in its journalistic glory the last bunch of years, no?
They awarded themselves Pulitzers over a hoax. Never apologized for their fictional reporting for years.
“….. they want to be lied to.”
This is hilarious coming from you, Jeff. This has to be parody at this point.
Hey buddy. Posting this for you again since you somehow skipped over the post while pushing the hoax again.
https://www.finepeoplehoax.net
Hey pal. In these Biden comments, did Biden say he want to ban handguns? Yes or no?
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/07/22/remarks-by-president-biden-in-a-cnn-town-hall-with-don-lemon/
Don’t know what fuckstain said but Biden has a long history of being a gun grabber. His goals are pretty clear regardless of who he’s pandering to at any moment.
Oh, he is. And Trump has a history of cozying up to unsavory right-wingers.
The issue here is, of course, that we all are supposed to bend over backwards and parse all of Trump's statements to give him the maximum benefit of the doubt. But not for anyone else. For everyone else, we are to make the worst assumptions possible and "read into" their statements words that they did not say.
So whenever anyone claims that Trump called Nazis "fine people" after the Charlottesville riots, I just laugh. It is what these fuckheads deserve. It is a taste of their own medicine for spending years and years calling everyone else "socialists" and "leftists" for doing nothing but disagreeing with them.
So you know it’s wrong but post it anyway?
There’s a word for that, Lying Jeffy.
He is trying to justify his known lie by pointing at others. He brought the hoax up completely in singular context. Not as an example of someone else parsing statements to lie. Jeff is trying to justify his own dishonesty by blaming others.
He is trying to justify his known lie by pointing at others.
this is what you and your tribe of mean girls here do all the time. You tell a lie, I point out it's a lie, then you go off on a tangent, misdirect, deflect, insult, etc., including telling other lies.
Cite?
https://reason.com/2024/04/15/iran-attacks-israel/?comments=true#comment-10522846
That isn’t a cite Fatfuck. That’s just more of your bullshit claims.
Time for you to go.
That isn't a cite jeff. That is you just accusing me of something without evidence as you spiral. Lol.
That’s not a citation, Jeffy. How much are you flailing?
Didn't you earlier accuse JesseAz's sources of not being legit because they ~cite themselves as the source.
You just cited yourself as a source for your own argument.
This is very hypocritical.
Hypocrisy is a cornerstone of his existence.
You just cited yourself as a source for your own argument.
In case you hadn't noticed, I don't take Jesse's demands for citations very seriously.
Of course you don’t. Facts mean nothing to you.
So you know it’s wrong but post it anyway?
He's a self-appointed political officer for the Democrats. Lying is his job.
Trump praises ‘fantastic’ Viktor Orbán while hosting Hungarian autocrat at Mar-a-Lago for meeting and concert
..
Orbán’s far-right populism, fierce anti-immigration rhetoric, Christian nationalism and hostility to LGBTQ rights has made him a popular ideological model for Trump’s “Make America Great Again” followers. He has spoken in the past at the Conservative Political Action Conference – an annual gathering of pro-Trump forces – and Hungary will host another edition of CPAC’s overseas conferences next month.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/08/politics/trump-orban-mar-a-lago/index.html
Not a surprise from Donnie - who admires Hitler.
Trump keeps praising dictators like Hitler and Kim Jong Un. Will Republicans ever care?
Trump's affinity for autocrats makes it clear that he has his own ambitions for total control of the United States.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2024/03/17/trump-hitler-north-korea-dictator-hungray-prime-minister/72975742007/
turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Anything that harms hicklib pederasts is automatically good.
What's wrong with Orban, Pluggo? Looking at his words and policies, he seems are lot less fascist and authoritarian than you and Jeff and your party.
Did Orban try to imprison his opponents on frivolous and novel charges?
Did Orban censor political speech on social media?
Did Orban have his secret police hassle citizens who complained about his policies?
Did Orban have his secret police spy on his opponents campaigns?
Did Orban have his secret police incite crowds and play agent provocateur with autistic kids on the internet, so he could justify crackdowns?
You and Chemjeff and Joe are far fucking worse than anything you purport Orban to be.
Shriek's main complaint with Orban is that he kicked Soros and his poisonous Central European University out of the country.
The Soros family should be put down. I’m surprised that hasn’t happened yet.
Why isn't Chemjeff decrying SPB2's citing of an opinion piece here?
It's almost as though that's fine for Chemjeff if the opinion piece agrees with his stance.
Jeff. Click the hoax link. There is no need to parse it. At all. Why do you refuse to click? It is clear to anyone not lying about his statements. Stop trying to defend your lie.
"Why do you refuse to click?"
We all know why. Sarc and Buttplug won't either.
All you really have to do with Trump is not bend over backwards to interpret what he says in the worst possible way. And remember that Trump is an unfiltered weirdo who says shit just for the reaction a lot of the time.
Look at the Trump cultist over here. /s
All you really have to do with Trump is not bend over backwards to interpret what he says in the worst possible way.
That's not what Jeff gets paid for.
"The issue here is, of course, that we all are supposed to bend over backwards and parse all of Trump’s statements"
You don't have to bend over backwards to parse Trump’s statements. You just have to stop twisting them to mean something else entirely.
You're too fucking stupid to play Goebbels here, Kemjeff.
He’s just a morbidly obese global Marxist loser.
You just have to stop twisting them to mean something else entirely.
Like what you do to everyone else who is not Trump?
Yesterday, you strongly hinted that the reason why AOC voted against the Iron Dome funding was because she was an anti-Semite. Do you have any proof of this whatsoever? Why did you twist her vote into "something else entirely"?
And this isn't a defense of AOC or her vote, it is simply pointing out your double standard. Trump is held to a much, much different standard than everyone else. Everyone else is treated like a typical garbage politician. But not Trump.
Like what you do to everyone else who is not Trump?
Check this out folks:
Yesterday, you strongly hinted that the reason why AOC voted against the Iron Dome funding was because she was an anti-Semite.
Creamjeff is the literal embodiment of hypocrisy. In the same comment he does to me exactly what he accused me of doing, without even missing a beat.
Yesterday, I posted a video of AOC crying when they approved funding for the Iron Dome. She was upset by it’s approval. She had argued passionately against it’s approval, and told the press its approval was the reason she was crying.
Jeff went to great lengths to try a cast doubt on the veracity of what had occurred, and put in a lot of hard work searching for bills mentioned in the background audio in an effort to discredit it.
Unfortunately for him, the New York Times and a host of other news sources had all reported that AOC had cried and was distraught over the bills approval. Again something she had actually claimed. So I posted the link as a response.
So today Jeff is trying to reframe yesterday into saying I “insinuated” (an insinuation on Jeff’s part, BTW) she was an anti-Semite by posting the video link.
So not only did he just accuse me of twisting an occurrence as he was twisting and occurrence, he accused me of insinuation… using insinuation.
Chemjeff in some ways is almost a miracle of nature.
Here’s the link so everyone can marvel at Jeff’s overwhelming hypocrisy and dishonesty themselves: https://reason.com/2024/04/14/biden-sends-u-s-forces-to-protect-israels-borders-for-the-first-time-ever/?comments=true#comment-10521772
For clarity I didn't "insinuate" she's an anti-Semite, I clearly declared it.
Jeff. I responded to your lie from last night. Lol.
He has many quotes. You try to isolate it to one. And weirdly doing this instead if admitting you were pushing the well known lie again.
Source of many of his statements and policies he has endorsed.
https://www.heritage.org/firearms/heritage-explains/bidens-gun-control-agenda
Here is his quote.
“The idea we still allow semiautomatic weapons to be purchased is sick. It’s just sick. It has no, no social redeeming value. Zero. None. Not a single, solitary rationale for it except profit for the gun manufacturers,” Biden argued.
https://nypost.com/2022/11/24/biden-vows-to-push-ban-on-semiautomatic-guns/
99% of handguns are semi automatics.
Want to try again?
Reason even had an article on it.
https://reason.com/2022/12/05/president-biden-wants-to-ban-semiautomatic-weapons-dream-on/
Is reason lying too jeff?
Oh but this is you dodging the question. Because you know I am right.
You demand that everyone parse and scrutinize Trump’s words in isolation. But with Biden or ANYONE ELSE, it’s fair game to just make bald assumptions and introduce outside contexts.
IN THAT SPEECH ABOVE, did Biden say he wanted to ban handguns? Yes or no, Jesse?
The fact that you cannot bring yourself to say “no” just demonstrates that your appeal to “accuracy in reporting” is a sham. You don’t want accuracy as a general principle, you want to “work the refs” and browbeat everyone else into giving your team overly favorable consideration, that you would never condone happening to anyone else.
Lol. You continue to triple down on you lying about Trump.
Please. Defend Joe’s statement. Show us where it is out of context. Did Reason get it wrong too dumbass?
You pushed a lie you've been given facts to dozens of times and now try to justify it saying you were justified because you were doing what others do? This is a weird take given you and sarc saying it doesn't matter if democrats violated the law, trump is still guilty. Also on that thread you utilized the lie as the origin of your argument, not an example of someone parsing a statement.
Youre a fucking leftist lying sophist caught in a lie who refuses to admit it. Lol.
Jeffy must have received regular beatings in school for being this annoying. But obviously not enough.
You are doing exactly what you criticize everyone else for doing to Trump. You and your team routinely twist the words of every not-Trump politician into something else entirely. Like with Biden's comments about ammunition, you and your team twist his comment into "OMG he wants to ban handguns!"
And no, the Reason article that you cited does not make the claim that Biden wants to ban handguns.
But these guys did:
https://twitter.com/HouseGOP/status/1418020563679842304?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1418020563679842304%7Ctwgr%5E989468aed71c77c73cc4832db6bc9f7507f1372c%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politifact.com%2Ffactchecks%2F2021%2Fjul%2F22%2Fnational-house-republicans%2Fno-joe-biden-doesnt-want-ban-handguns%2F
"President Biden says he wants to ban handguns. "
The statement is a lie, in the same way that Trump calling Nazis "fine people" was a lie. Yet you condone the former and cry foul over the latter. Because you are not committed to truth for its own sake.
I posted his statement. Heritage goes into the long list of gun reforms.
You keep deflecting because youre a projecting leftist.
Explain Joe's comments above. Explain why you keep posting the fine people hoax.
There is Biden having the ATF change rules on pistol parts.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/27/us/politics/ghost-guns-atf-rule.html
There are his new rules for the gun show loophole.
https://www.atf.gov/news/pr/justice-department-proposes-new-regulation-update-definition-engaged-business-firearms
If courts weren't busy striking these laws down he would do more. Bidens statement above is clear and you want to deny it.
Youre a partisan leftist shit weasel. Even sarc is against you on this topic lol.
His own announcement about gun control to reduce crime. Pistols make up the majority of gun crime.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/06/23/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-announces-comprehensive-strategy-to-prevent-and-respond-to-gun-crime-and-ensure-public-safety/
How much of a leftist shit weasel are you.
Sarc will probably change his stance in a week or so.
If the vast majority of handguns in common usage are semi-automatic, and Biden says he wants to ban semi-automatic weapons, he’s saying he wants to ban almost all handguns. Only revolvers, among common handguns, are not semi-automatic.
It seems you are bending over backwards to defend what Biden said in this regard, while mocking others for “bending over backwards” to parse Trump’s words in the most favorable light.
This too seems rather hypocritical.
I don’t call him Lying Jeffy for nothing.
I mean, it’s Jeff…
I am making a point. No one here tolerates the argument of "well, Trump cozies up to unsavory right-wing figures, so it's totally believable that Trump called Nazis fine people." But that type of argumentation totally works for every politician whose name is not Trump. With Trump, we must take his words literally (except when the Trump-whisperers declare we mustn't) and construe them narrowly and in the best possible light to give him the maximum benefit of the doubt. That is ridiculous. It is not a standard anyone here would ever apply to any other politician. Why does Trump get the low-standard treatment?
He doesn’t. You’re a liar. We’ve all grumbled about some of the mistakes made letting swamp creatures into his White House. But then there’s you. You have zero standards more scum like Biden and the filth that he panders to and the traitors that surround him.
But you never intended to make an honest argument in the first place.
she said she's going to marry a carrot! I can't believe she actually said it.
You’re pulling this bullshit again. You got your ass handed to you so you claim Biden never said he wanted ban handguns because he didn’t say those exact words in that exact way,
You’re a disingenuous cunt.
“Zero. None. Not a single, solitary rational for it.”
Lol. There goes that selectively nuanced Jeff again. That quote is pretty hard to parse buddy. Good thing you’re here or people might get the wrong idea.
WTF is wrong with you?
Now tell us about official military sources during the Viet Nam war.
Nobody over in Ukraine has been transparent about the inevitable loss.
Trump does have one advantage that I don't agree with him having, and that's briefings.
It's customary, but stupid, that ex-presidents get some of the intelligence that the current occupier has every day.
So, Trump likely does know more than me.
Former American Military Officers like Doug McGregor, Dan Davies, Matt Hoh and others. You know Americans who are not bought off by MIC, and the new Trotskites who seem to control US foreign policy and the media these days..
It doesn't look like your standard police killing of an innocent man, but some media organizations and activists have been leaving out context about what transpired between Reed and the officers.
They seem to pick winners, while Philando Castile remains under defended.
It doesn't seem like it? He shot a fucking cop. Shooting a cop who is surrounded by more cops seems like one of the most effective methods of reducing one's carbon footprint possible. There may be quicker means, but few would be more guaranteed of success.
Small business owner invests his "whole nest egg" into Trump's Truth Social stock.
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/small-time-investors-trump-truth-185507366.html
It's easy to laugh at a guy like this for violating every principle of sound investment strategy because of his cult-like devotion to one man, but instead I feel sorry for him. This is what Trump does over and over again - sells overpriced garbage to fleece people, because of his "image" and "brand". He did this with Trump Steaks, Trump University, Trump Vodka, and now Trump Twitter.
If you read the article it says he’s devoted to Trump and plans to buy more.
Oh I know. And then when he inevitably goes broke, he will most likely blame "those damn libruls".
Leftists. Liberals is so like yesterday. Now anyone who criticizes Trump or gets in his way is a leftist. (Anyone who agrees with calling those people “leftist” in anything other than a tongue in cheek fashion doesn’t know what the word means)
The circle jerk is strong with these two.
No no no. They are MARXISTS.
Fascists!
Antifa says they aren't the fascists either. Weird you two yell the same defenses.
Sarc you especially have shown you have no clue what fascism is.
https://reason.com/2023/12/12/texas-abortion-law-test/?comments=true#comment-10354105
You two are just pushing the leftist need to redefine words to justify your own preferred policies and protect democrats. Lol.
Especially hilarious as you and Jeff were calling Trump Hitler because he used the words blood and vermin while ignoring the dems long use of calling conservatives vermin.
They ARE economic fascists. As in, they have literally been “allowing” private ownership of capital and the means of production while doing everything from dictating prices to how the boards of directors is made up. All for the “good of the nation”.
Jeff is indeed a fascist, but you're just an angry little drunken troll out for revenge.
And you two are retards. Go find a room if you’re going to make out that much online.
He might also blame the following:
the "deep state"
Wall St Jews
globalists
Soros
Antifa
mainstream media
None of the mainstream media supports Trump. The only network that isn’t against him is Fox, which is still underground. Surprised anyone has heard of it since it requires special subscriptions and other hoops to watch. Poor Trump. Everyone is against him. Makes me want to cry.
How many times now have you been burnt repeating Democratic Party narratives from party organs now?
And yet no lessons learned.
The mainstream media is a captive outlet of the democrat party. So much so that the DNC and the White House send many MSM entities their talking points.
So again, fuck you, you lying fatfuck Marxist.
Wall St Jews
Well, they did finance the construction of that space laser.
Tell us again about Zionists, Jeff.
I said nothing about "Zionists". Why don't you tell us why you think AOC is an anti-Semite based on nothing but her one vote on an Iron Dome bill.
Do you think BDS is rooted in antisemitism? My guess is you'll say no as it opens you up to a lot of her garbage.
based on nothing but her one vote on an Iron Dome bill.
Why do you suspect Hitler hated the Jews based on one little book he wrote?
there we go - you can't answer the question, and you invoke Hitler. I win.
turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
Sevo, you need to change it up. There is so much about Kiddie Raper, Fatfuck, Mod, and Sarc to excoriate and ridicule. It shouldn’t take much to keep our condemnations of their Marxist propaganda fresh. Plus, the possibility of being hurtful to these filth is much greater if they’re not seeing the same, albeit correct, insults and derision every day.
WTF is your purpose commenting on Reason?
What? You mean because I don't peddle odd conservative conspiracies I shouldn't be here?
Alex Jones is a lying nutjob con artist like Donnie. There is nothing libertarian about either.
DEEP STATE! BLERP! DERPTY BLOOP!
turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
No, because you are just as ridiculous in your anti-deep state and counter-Trump posturing.
Let's talk about whether SARS-CoV-2 was a bioweapon deliberately engineered by the Chinese military to stop Trump from being re-elected, because the Chinese government were being hurt so badly by Trump’s sanctions and “tough on China” policies.
I actually heard that one from a right-wing lunatic. Why don’t you tell us why this type of garbage shouldn’t be mocked and ridiculed.
Are you an equal opportunity mocker? If so, did you find time to mock all the increasingly obvious official lies during Covid, including those that seemed more motivated in defeating Trump than actual public health?
Of course I'm not an equal opportunity mocker. I mock what I think deserves to be mocked. Do you mock every single nutjob conspiracy? No to that as well.
So now your down to uncited random people to prove you aren't pro censorship and supported lab leak being censored by government and major media outlets?
“… deliberately engineered”? Yes.
“…. to stop trump”? No.
“…..deliberately released”? No.
“….. never let a crisis go to waste”? Yes.
Idiot.
"I don’t peddle odd conservative conspiracies"
That's true. Most DNC conspiracy theories are fascist and totalitarian in purpose.
This seems to be the basic makeup shrike, sarc, and Jeff have settled on. Any bad news based on actions from democrats is a right wing conspiracy.
It's the Trudeau move from the trucker protests, now sweeping through globohomo institutions worldwide. Any legitimate criticism is now right-wing conspiracy theory.
TBF, to globalists, any pushback against their agenda is right-wing as it tries to chip away (however slightly) at their inherently collectivist ideology.
You’re such a desperate, fat piece of shit.
Reuters is reporting the white house knew of and condoned the attack from Iran within limits.
Iran informed Turkey in advance of its planned operation against Israel, conveyed through diplomatic channels, aiming to limit escalation in the Middle East.
Iran informed Turkey in advance of its planned operation against Israel, a Turkish diplomatic source told Reuters on Sunday, adding that Washington had conveyed to Tehran via Ankara that any action it took had to be "within certain limits."
https://m.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-796998
Joe and his handlers are trying to balance his pro-Palestinian terrorist base and his pro-Israel funders. So he opts for allowing a few Jews to be murdered for existing, just not too many at a time.
This seems like one of the dumbest self-inflicted political quandries one can have. One side is clearly right, one is clearly wrong. Having a president pander to both sides of an armed conflict is another level of retarded.
the U.S. has been giving money to both sides for decades its f'ing stupid. Even israel has been dumping money into palastine to appease teh UN teh whole world is stupid or just wants forever war instead of resolving issues. No wars have been resolved since WWII for some reason, is it the military complex and politicians getting money out of it yes.
While I agree that funding both sides is pretty retarded, it's also notable that it's difficult to resolve a conflict where one of the sides demands the complete genocide of their enemies.
Not saying the U.S. should be involved, just noting that 'the other side' is observably pretty disgusting in their stated aims for the region.
Or Iran was contemplating attacking an American vessel or base and that was off limits unless Iran wanted a US response directly on Iran.
Until we know what the limit was it's hard to judge.
Possibly the most sensible thing out of the Biden administration yet. There's still hope this venting will avoid all out war.
Iran either failed miserably or was trying to stay within limits so...maybe a smart move?
They launched almost 300 armaments. The known deficiency of defensive measures like Iran dome or the US missile defense is swarm tactics can get through the system. They only have so many radars and missiles to track and intercept. This was not done for just show. Likewise they still hit targets ironically only killing one Arab in Israel. Also the cost of expending all the missiles used to intercept is a cost.
This was not done just for show.
they were looking for holes in the defenses
I am not saying "just for show" but "limited." Iran needs to show it's citizens it will not take Israel's attack without retaliating. They need to hit some targets. Just enough drones and missiles were launched to do a little damage. So for Iran, either it's intentionally limited or utter failure. Either seems possible to me.
But the US tactic of let this happen might be a smart and unusual move of attempting to avoid a war. Time will tell.
I would buy this if we didn't have evidence of Iran supplying their proxies in Jordan and Syria or working with Hamas to plan Oct 7th.
The entire Israel strike in Syria was in response to Oct 7th planning by Iran.
Well, proxy wars are all the rage these days.
Look at you justifying genocidal wars of aggression so long as you use proxies.
Iron Dome*
The Iranian regime should be internally overthrown or exterminated externally. It isn’t optional anymore. They have nukes, or will imminently.
Thanks to the democrats and everyone here who supports the democrats.
I minor
incursionattack is fine.My only limits I would ask of the Mullahs in Tehran are spatio-temporal i.e. that they occupy no spatio-temporal coordinates i.e. that they die.
🙂
😉
It takes only a brief glance at Mahtani's X feed to get a sense of just how much of a garden variety liberal she is.
I fear CBS might start weaponizing factchecking.
Why are they so behind the competition?
Jeff will be by soon to say why parental consent isn’t needed because PP are gender experts or something.
Attorney General Andrew Bailey
@AGAndrewBailey
NEW: The Court just ordered Planned Parenthood-St. Louis to turn over documents exposing how they subjected children to puberty blockers and irreversible surgery, often without parental consent.
.
We are 3/3 in our court battle to force clinics to comply with our investigations
Mayo Clinic, following actual science, notes puberty blockers are not in fact reversible.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2024/04/mayo-clinic-study-raises-serious-questions-about-reversibility-of-puberty-blockers/
I also like ‘serious questions’ and the ‘reversibility’ are *the* issue.
Like, if there were a pill that made you think you were Abraham Lincoln and people, for no particular reason at all, came to the medical community saying, “I think I might be Abraham Lincoln.” and, abundantly, medical professionals said, “Here take this pill that helps you think you’re Abraham Lincoln all of whose biological effects are completely reversible.” was completely copacetic if not for the *other* unforeseen but totally foreseeable consequences.
Like the no one anywhere in the medical community out-of-hand and without even needing to ask a question could’ve come to the conclusion “No, we shouldn’t broadly be issuing identity-confused kids Abraham Lincoln pills.”
And here I thought molesting
and irreversibly mutilatingchildren worldwide, systematically passing the buck as top-down policy, and utterly failing to purge any deliberate offenders and known actors was the Catholic Church’s job.Liar. I've never argued against parental consent.
It's you and your team which argues against parental consent - when they give consent to procedures that you don't approve of, you declare them to be suffering from "Munchausen syndrome" or something and want the state to overrule their consent.
I argue in favor of parental consent. You argue that the state should subvert parental consent.
Don’t you worry. He and his girlfriends will repeat the same lies tomorrow and the next day and the day after that… Why? Because it makes them giggle when they make you dance like a monkey.
What's the lie in noting that the queer tranny cult is anti-science, is open about convincing kids that they are "born in the wrong body" and need to mutilate themselves for a never-ending dopamine rush of "trans joy," and that pretty much everything they've claimed in the last 15 years about the benefits of such procedures is, in fact, a load of shit based on the predilections of a Usenet castration fetish forum and sophistry of gender studies academics?
“Don’t you worry. He and his girlfriends”
In this very thread, folks, Sarc is the first reply to almost every Jeffy post, giving him a rhetorical blowjob in each one, but look at him insinuate that it’s others.
Ctrl+f Sarc’s posts and check it out. It’s hilarious (and a little gross).
Ideas!
Well Jeffy, you did advocate for foreign sexual predators, including child rapists, to have unlimited rights to travel to the US.
No Drunky, that’s you. And your morbidly obese, Marxist friend is a liar. Just like how you’re a liar.
Sure jeff.
You still defend WPATH and have defended laws that say not transitioning kids is child abuse. You've defended schools transitioning kids claiming child abuse as justification. Youre lying.
Does your support for parental consent include religion-motivated clitorectomies? Gay conversion therapy? Hyper-traditional gender roles?
None of those. But he has defended parental/child consent for molestation.
Jeffy IS the CEO of NAMBLA you know.
I support parental consent for any medical procedure on children that is performed according to a documented standard of care to treat a fully diagnosed disease state and in which all parties are fully informed of all the risks involved.
Jesse and his tribe of mean girls cannot make the same claim. They want the state to be the ultimate arbiter of which medical procedures parents are permitted to consent to.
So:
religion-motivated clitorectomies?
no, because that is not a treatment for a disease state
Gay conversion therapy?
no, because being gay is not an illness
Hyper-traditional gender roles?
sure, if they want – that is not a matter for the state or the medical profession to get involved in, as long as there is no violation of the NAP.
Except you only support the WPATH standard of declare no matter how exposed their standard of care is and they even admit to. See WPATH files.
Meanwhile you’ll ignore all studies from Europe, Mayo Clinic, and others because right wing “opinion” sites push those studies.
WPATH is an activist group.
I support parental consent for any medical procedure on children that is performed according to a documented standard of care to treat a fully diagnosed disease state and in which all parties are fully informed of all the risks involved.
That absolutely excludes "gender affirming care" for minors.
Being gay IS an illness - the vast majority of the kids getting irreversible gender “therapy” are gay.
Other than that fact, why would you say that “being gay is not an illness” - but argue that being male or female is? You are about as deep as a puddle under a coaster
For all his pretentiousness, Groomer Jeffy isn’t very bright.
Wait, wait, wait.
Upthread you ask “why can’t (you) mock the moron who spent his life savings on trump stocks”. Fair enough.
But it’s beyond your selectively nuanced sensibilities to mock parents who mutilate their children? Or advocate for mutilating other people’s children?
God, what an asshole. Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you?
I don't mock parents trying to find medical care for their suffering children, no. Evidently I'm not the monster that you are.
Polls show former President Donald Trump is ascendant with the youngest bloc of the electorate, even leading President Joe Biden in some surveys, as less-engaged young voters spurn Biden...
If only they were engaged with the information corporate media is providing for them would they realize how great Biden is.
This is the best time ever to be an American. I wish people would quit feeding those kids all that dangerous misniformation. They will be the ones I hold responsible when Orange Man starts hurting feelings again.
Maybe a "Just Say No" campaign will get them to see the errors in their ways?
“Just say ‘Don’t’”?
What do you think public schools and higher ed are for?
I mean, if the brainwashing appointment is already going to be put on the tab, might as well show up.
Cops killing innocent people being normal is only a thing for the doj.
Iran lost 3 more austere religious scholars
More emails showing suppression of the origins of covid. And using personal emails to avoid FOIA.
“The Select Subcommittee is now aware of potential further attempts by Dr. [David] Morens to subvert public transparency,” the letter said. “Specifically, the Select Subcommittee has been made aware of alleged communications between Dr. Morens and you regarding EcoHealth Alliance.
.
“These communications included emails from Dr. [David] Morens' personal Gmail account to you and Dr. Peter Daszak of EcoHealth,” the letter adds.
https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/feds-scientists-take-fire-allegedly-hiding-covid-origins-truth
I was assured by The Science that it came from a combo of Pangolin and RacCoon Dog. They did the right thing by protecting us from disinformation.
But look at what the panic-demic crowd achieved:
1. Permanent expansion of the authoritarian state.
2. Further conditioning of the compliant, dependent public.
3. A big inflation spike, to assist in wealth transfer and devaluing public debt.
And best of all,
4. Defeating Trump in 2020.
Hi nick, did you continuously conflatblegal and illegal immigration? I bet you did!
Also how much of your own money and housing space are you donating to illegals?
Were you born an ass or have had to study and practice being one to achieve your current mastery over the art?
Yep wanting people to live up to the ideals they say they have is being an ass, you got me there
Nah, the ass part is more about style.
This will end well. Denver defends the police to invest in illegal immigration profit.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2024/04/denver-to-defund-police-to-the-tune-of-8-4-million-in-order-to-pay-for-illegal-aliens/
Cultural enrichment, good and hard.
"Wait, we said virtue signaling not acting and spending!"
Retail sales jumped 0.7% in March, much higher than expected
Americans still buying their Cheesy-Poofs
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/04/15/retail-sales-jumped-0point7percent-in-march-much-higher-than-expected.html
Americans rate Biden particularly negatively on a few specific issues. Only about 2 in 10 Americans think Biden’s presidency helped “a lot” or “a little” on cost of living, and 16% say that about immigration and border security. Nearly 6 in 10 say his presidency hurt a lot or a little on these issues.
Domestic policy, foreign policy - your guy is a total failure.
You Dems should have gone with Cory Booker in 2020. He'd be leading the game show host by 10+ points in every poll.
"...He’d be leading the game show host by 10+ points in every poll."
Stuff your TDS up your ass, you pathetic piece of shit.
LOLOLOLOL
You replied to a post whose main point is that Joe Biden is a dismal failure .......... and could only focus on the part in which I accurately described Trump's previous job!
hahahahahahahaha
You're as attached to Trump as PB is to Biden and you can't even realize it!
*wipes away tears*
Yeah maybe this comment section deserves to die. Look at all these "libertarians" who think their favorite politician is infallible and want to burn us heretics. 🙂
Stuff your TDS up your ass, you slimy piece of shit.
Aaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh!
Burn the witch!
She's been bashing Hillary Clinton and Charles Koch and Shikha Dalmia / Fiona Harrigan for half a decade but criticizing Donald Trump is crossing the line!!!!
If you had anything other than adolescent focus on personality to gripe about, you might get a hearing. He's a long ways from perfect; his tariffs suck for instance.
But to TDS addled shits like you, that doesn't matter; he's a 'game show host', who sends 'mean tweets'.
Fuck you with a running, rusty chain saw; asses like you are the reason we got stuck with slobberin' Joe.
I mean, the only part of that I see an issue with is that Corey Booker is unelectable even over a game show host. I doubt he'd be leading Trump by anything, let alone double digits.
It seems to me that Biden was their last grasp at a nationally electable figure, and even then it was mostly just because he served in the Obama administration without doing anything too retarded. At least nothing that anyone paid any attention to.
Once the geriatric wing of the party dies off, all that will be left are outright socialists. There are a few somewhat centrist Democrats, but they are pretty old themselves and would be destroyed in the Democrat primaries.
Well, his previous job was POTUS
These polls on the issues make me seriously question the sample quality of the head to head polls. When he's 20 points underwater on every issue, it's hard to think the race is actually remotely close.
There are a lot of retards that still believe msm
Lots of people will vote for whomever the DNC tells them to vote for. Without question, without thought.
Biden is a bad President. In a legit two-party system I'd expect him not to be reelected. Under the system we have, though, I still think he's going to win unless his health severely declines.
It's just a fact that in the past few decades (post-1980s) the Democrat has the advantage in a Presidential election. Beginning in 1992 pretty much every election has gone one of two ways:
(a) comfortable Dem victory - 1992 1996 2008 2012
(b) GOP *barely* squeaks by - 2000 (essentially a tie) 2004 (Kerry only needed one more decent-sized state) 2016 (Trump's effective margin was tens of thousands of votes across a few swing states)
2020 was the oddball in that this time the Dem won the tossup states by a combined tens of thousands of votes.
And don't forget abortion was the Democratic Party's defining issue even before Roe got nuked.
In short I think Biden will be carried by the fact that his base knows he sucks and is too old ..... but they'll still turn out because all they care about is abortion (and having their loans forgiven, if applicable).
equally as likely the 3d party affects the incumbent & we have 1992 again and/or the swing states all swing T & it's 1984 ... mho
If trump wins it'll be him having biden's performance.
Im not a betting man, but RFK @ 19% or trump @ 49 states and 58%. What odds? Im in!!!!
From your link.
A rise in gas prices helped push the headline retail sales number higher, with sales up 2.1% on the month at service stations. However, the biggest growth area for the month was online sales, up 2.7%, while miscellaneous retailers saw an increase of 2.1%.
.
Multiple categories did report declines in sales for the month: Sporting goods, hobbies, musical instruments and books posted a 1.8% decrease, while clothing stores were off 1.6%, and electronics and appliances saw a 1.2% drop.
So rising prices made people pay more, increased sales, while reducing sales from non necessity items. Victory?
People spending money buying things now before they become even more unaffordable.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit.
Honestly, the young-people-try-choking thing doesn't shock me. But I am shocked that even the Midwesterners are down.
Not our fault chicks wana be treated like shit in bed. Seriously every other aspect of life they wana be "respected" and "valued". But never in bed speaking from my experience.
Eeew! Anything that could draw blood or leave a corpse is decidedly a turn-off for me, as is anyone who is turned on by that!
Sexbots are sounding better and better all the time!
🙂
😉
'It doesn't look like your standard police killing of an innocent man, but some media organizations and activists have been leaving out context about what transpired between Reed and the officers.'
Good to know Reason was not the only publisher to "leave out context".
I just want to know when killing innocent people became a standard.
What is "innocent"?
>>people
are either of you biologists?
The solution to violent outcomes during routine traffic stops is for police to discontinue all routine traffic stops. The revenue generated for the police benevolent fund is not worth it in terms of public safety. There has been no significant increase in actual crime in those places where the failed “broken window” theory has been abandoned and police have been limited to responding to actual crimes. It’s long past time to eliminate the militarization of police, repeal victimless crimes and scale the law enforcement mission back significantly!
'"If you care about your fucking country, read Ludwig von Mises and the six lessons of the Austrian economic school, motherfuckers," said Brazilian MMA fighter Renato Moicano over the weekend after yet another UFC win.'
Here's an idea. As part of further candidate debates, put them in a cage with Moicano.
Great advice! I wonder how many members of the Mises Caucus actually followed that?
"Nick Gillespie did the Lord's work and defended the value of immigration"
Reason's open-borders uber alles position isn't working out too well for people forced to pay taxes to hand cash to illegal aliens.
His whole take is utterly insane.
Someone’s 23-and-me comes back 20% European, 20% Native American. Is that person an immigrant or has their family been on the same soil for 6000 yrs.?
Either way, Nick somehow knows what the exact right amount of people like that on an immigration panel is.
This article from the Sunday edition of my local newspaper points out that it was immigrates that were important in reducing inflation and helping provide a soft landing for the economy without a recession. Nick's right immigrate are an asset.
https://madison.com/eedition/page-a16/page_22684fe8-34df-5c90-816a-5c56986f0e05.html
Ah, an Associated Press article printed unaltered in the Wisconsin State Journal. And who or what is the source for their claims? Why it's Paul Krugman.
Wasn't Jeff just complaining about political sourcing?
...also, you're all conflating illegal and legal immigration again.
Just for fun google: paul krugman wrong
The variety of sources making claims that Krugman was wrong about something is surpassed only by the number things he was marked wrong about. Even his own paper, and indeed even his own admissions, says he was wrong over and over again.
Nick’s right immigrate are an asset.
No one here is arguing against the fact that Nick sees immigrants as property.
Yeah, but illegals aren’t.
that is idiotic...the only growth in jobs has been part time jobs and full time wages have not kept up with prices. The issue is the money printing. Stop that and you kill inflation but that can't be allowed by the ruling class in DC for obvious reasons.
That worn-out talking point is beyond threadbare and has achieved "tiresome" status. The solution to being forced to pay taxes so the politicians in your state can hand it to immigrants is to stop politicians from handing cash to immigrants. The solution to having to pay taxes to support immigrants is NOT to try to stop immigration. Repeating a lie endlessly does not turn it into a truth, no matter how stubborn you are.
The lie is pretending welfare to immigrants is going to stop based on your demands. It is happening now. It is happening to pay those openly violating the law. You can wish for a unicorn but it isnt going to appear magically for you.
The other lie is your claim people want to stop immigration. They want to stop illegal immigration. The former can be adjusted for needs. While the latter is uncontrolled and costly.
1.5M legal immigrants come here a year. Yet you want to pretend demanding the 3.5M illegal immigrants from joining in means ending immigration. It is a dishonest assertion used by your side. Just like it is dishonest you claim we should only demand welfare for them to stop when you know it won't happen.
Exactly. Illegals are NOT immigrants.
Of course they are. An immigrant is simply someone who comes into one country from another.
Like when the Nazis entered Poland?
>>The attack was a retaliation for an April 1 Israeli strike in Syria
it's a shame O put his thumb on the Iranian people when they wanted to revolt
Also not mentioned is that the Mullahs in Iran have been attacking Israel for years via Hamas, Hezbollah, and Islamic Jihad.
This includes an attack upon the Israeli Embassy in Argentina in 1992 and an attack upon a Jewish Community Center in Argentina in 1994, in the Western Hemisphere, in violation of The Monroe Doctrine and Conventions outlawing Crimes Against Humanity.
The Mullahs have long since passed the "long trail of abuses" line the Founders set for The British Empire.
probably
Probably? I'm not sure what you're saying...
agreeing w/you.
>>The first criminal trial of a former American president commences today in lower Manhattan, with jury selection.
outrage, yes? for the injustice and all? Reason, I'm looking in your direction ...
>>(Also: Peep the RFK Jr. fanfare in the lobby.)
libertarians for (D)? just be (D) and drop the facade.
>>Honestly, the young-people-try-choking thing doesn't shock me.
the 80s was a far superior time in many ways.
Whatever happened to just getting chicks drunk?
like I was saying about the 80s ... although we also had coke & mdma was legal for much of the decade
>>Polls show former President Donald Trump is ascendant with the youngest bloc of the electorate
nobody wants to encourage their great-grandfather to stumble around in front of everybody it's just mean.
You want to know something great about America? Only one person on the stage has a family history dating back before 1900
I’m going to need an actual libertarian to explain to me how having a family lineage that goes back over 200 yrs. is a bad thing. Magic dirt that turns people into racists?
Reason *still* can’t seem to grasp the whole concept of “Anti-racism isn’t the opposite of racism and oecophobia is just as much an irrational subconscious motivation as xenophobia.”
Edit: FFS, Great Grandma Casual’s *lifespan* stretches back to the last century. This is even more retarded than the Spanish-speaking Mexicans who take a 23-and-Me test and discover, to their astonishment, that they’re some 30, 40, 50%, or more, of European ancestry.
>> and two of the participants--one on each side of the proposition--are themselves immigrants.
you forgot the even stupider part about Reason not understanding we all come from immigrants derp ... although now I feel dirty about mine coming over in the 1700s thanks Nick
Imagine not realizing that Japan, who's hardly alone or even in the minority globally, was literally enriching their bloodline in nationalist fashion as policy in the 19th Century... and then decrying that Americans had the gall to "let" their kids grow up on the same soil.
Like I said, it's the anti-racism ideology where it's OK to be as abusive to natives as you want to be because you can't be racist against natives. Except with the extra helping of stupid around "Well, with *those* natives, it's OK, but *those* natives it's racist." That person isn't a libertarian cultural or otherwise, they don't lack a vision of übermensch and a thousand years of peace in their head. It's the same vision just with different skin tones and people identified as Jews.
As an actual libertarian – for whatever it’s worth – I will be glad to man-splain to you that this is an article subtly critical of the anti-immigration positions of so many candidates and policy makers, citing the irony of actual immigrants being anti-immigration. Almost every generation in American history has seen massive waves of immigration and every one of them has complained about the problems associated with such influxes and the end of the American “culture as we know it.” All of their fears have been unfounded, all of the social dislocations were temporary, successive waves of immigrants have not only blended successfully within a generation but have arguably IMPROVED American culture and society in the process. All you xenophobes are wrong now and you have been wrong ever since 1621. Get over it!
All of their fears have been unfounded, all of the social dislocations were temporary, successive waves of immigrants have not only blended successfully within a generation but have arguably IMPROVED American culture and society in the process. All you xenophobes are wrong now and you have been wrong ever since 1621. Get over it!
LOL, please. The US has been on a downward trajectory since Hart-Cellar.
Ctrl+f "welfare spending": 0 results.
If you had principles, you would fail your own claims to actual libertarianism when you presume to speak on behalf of immigrants of whatever generation for whom you do not actually speak.
Given all of the above, again by you and Nick's precepts, you must be a Native American, eh?
Again, conflating illegal and legal immigration.
My mother and sister-in law are immigrants to Canada, one from France, the other from the Caribbean. My brother and sister both married Americans and emigrated to the states.
They all proved themselves and put the work in necessary to emigrate to their new countries, although three of them weren’t particularly well-off when they did.
They didn’t cheat, they didn’t sneak in, they made sure they had the resources so that they wouldn’t be a burden when they entered their new homelands.
Breaking the law of the country they're entering is the very first thing Illegals do, on the other hand.
Again, conflating illegal and legal immigration.
While not wrong, that isn’t even the half of it.
As I point out above, if a native individual marries an immigrant, is their kid the child of immigrants or does their native family lineage trace back hundreds of years?
Again, Nick can’t possibly know the right answer but he’s sure that baby needs cut in half and it’s a good thing that there is only one of them weighing in on immigration.
It’s, as indicated, ideologically in line with same one-drop/magic dirt racism that he would otherwise regard as ridiculous.
It's not even the legal/illegal that matters really. I'd take an illegal immigrant who is here to work any day over an asylum seeker or anyone else who thinks they are entitled to be given something rather than having to work hard to earn it.
The legal immigrants in my family who put actual effort into becoming part of the country they wanted to belong to, have very little patience for illegals... even if they are hard workers.
And I can't hold that against them. Personally, I don't really care. If you are here to be a decent productive person and not expecting a subsidy, then it's all good as far as I'm concerned.
As an actual libertarian you seem to be ignoring the changes in costs and expansionist needs for population increases in the past. Why? Needs dont remain static over time. Costs due to regulations and welfare are much different than even 50 years ago. Does being a libertarian require ignorance to history and changes in markets?
Although I certainly have no objection to our military shooting down incoming military hardware – it’s impossible for them to know for sure what the target is – I have to question (again!) why we have so much of our military assets in that particular region in the first place! It’s almost like the guy who puts a chip on his shoulder and dares you to knock it off. Do our Fearless Leaders LIKE putting our children and grandchildren in harm’s way unnecessarily, making them big, fat, juicy targets for every tin-pot dictator around the world? There may be some justification for our Navy escorting non-military shipping through troubled international waters, and patrolling around the globe in case of military or humanitarian emergencies, but George Washington warned over two hundred years ago against “entangling alliances.” He was right then and he’s still right now.
>>Do our Fearless Leaders LIKE putting our children and grandchildren in harm’s way unnecessarily
um ... yes?
Well, those oikophillic little ingrates were born here!
After the feckless Iranian attack Israel holds the high ground. I hope they take the time to think about this. It was not just the Americans, but a number of other countries helping and holding that good will is important. Revenge is a dish best served cold. Wait for the right chance and the good target before hitting back.
Revenge is a dish best served cold. Wait for the right chance and the good target before hitting back.
Good advice...For good actors.
The only good advice for the Mullahs of Iran is to die and free the people of Iran and the rest of the world who have lived in fear of global Jihad and living under Dar Al-Islam.
The best result is the Iranian people brutally overthrowing and executing the mullahs and their supporters. Hopefully cleansing Iran of militant Islamists.
Until 1979, the Persians generally prescribed to a soft version of Islam, much less convert by the sword, stone you in the streets if you don't wear a face covering etc. A lot of this was because Persians had been interacting with Europeans for Millennia before and after Mohammad was born. They were a crossroad for the silk road, and also had fairly close ties with countries bordering the Baltic, via the riverine trade networks first established by the Scandinavians in Eastern Europe. Plus, the Persians always had a bit of
a sense of superiority when it came to their relationships with the Arabic peoples and the Turks. Truth be told, the golden age of Islam, when Baghdad was the epicenter of intellectual endeavor was a time when the Shi'a and specifically the Persians, dominated the Islamic world. This period came to an end first when the Arabic and Berber Sunni became dominant, and then the emergence of the Sunni Turks.
I have friends who fled during the revolution. One was a schoolmate of mine. Both his parents were medical doctors. They were also staunch Reagan republicans who loved America.
There you go, Man! Here is where the guns need to come out!
🙂
😉
Unfortunately. Every time we have a democrat in office they prop up the Iranian regime. Biden is currently doing that.
I hope the Israelis think about it too...mostly for better targeting.
"Wait for the right chance and the good target before hitting back."
Wikipedia might be of help. Here is a list of all the hospitals in Iran:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_hospitals_in_Iran
Choose carefully though. The Dr. Sapir Hospital and Charity Center is the Iran's largest hospital for religious minorities. It's owned and operated by Tehran's Jewish community.
Do any of them have members of a terrorist group? Antisemites like you keep leaving that fact out.
I'd be very surprised if Israel didn't have a contingency plan for just this situation on the shelf. .
Didn't Israel bomb their embassy in Syria? Doesn't Israel have nukes and in clear violation of the NNPT the US still sells them (or gives them) weapons? Perhaps there isn't a "good side" in this one for America? Did you ever think about that?
Iran was shown to be behind the October 7 attacks. Why should they get away with it?
"Meanwhile, Biden is stronger with seniors than he was four years ago, even as his personal image is significantly diminished since he was elected last time."
Senile solidarity? Roman Hruska effect?
Perennial fearmongering about Republicans cutting Social Security?
RNG. Half the seniors polled 4 yrs. ago are dead. Half remember voting against Bush in the last election.
The fact that such a population would be composed of the most shut ins and target of election tampering is just you being a democracy-hating insurrectionist.
It doesn't look like your standard police killing of an innocent man, but some media organizations and activists have been leaving out context about what transpired between Reed and the officers.
Shots fired at Eric Boehm?
like tripping a 3 year old.
"Iran did not necessarily expect the Arrow 3 system to work as well as it did."
How well did it work? Some of Iran's missiles landed on their intended targets and exploded. That's with plenty of notice and a small and diminished barrage from Iran. If one assumes that any subsequent attacks will also be telegraphed, only Iran and no other nations will participate, and will involve a limited number of missiles, then Israeli air defenses might be up to the task.
If the next attack is intended to do maximum damage to Israel, takes advantage of the element of surprise, is co-ordinated with other actors in the region, and involves a significantly larger number of attacking missiles, the air defense systems may not provide the intended protection, or the costs may be prohibitive, even with US footing the bill.
misconstrueman, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he good at. misconstrueman is a nasty-ass anti-semite, a pathological liar, and is also a pathetic dumbass.
misconstrueman lies; it’s what he does. misconstrueman is a lying antisemitic piece of shit. misconstrueman, the lying antisemite, would do the world a favor by doing a swan dive off a building in gaza.
How well did that work?
Are you at Gaza now? You would know.
I agree with you on this one. I don't think this attack by Iran was intended to maximize casualties. More likely, I subscribe to the idea that Iran needed a show of force so as not to seem weak to its own people after the bombs by Israel in Syria/Lebanon killed a few of theirs.
This is my analysis (for whatever it's worth) on the tactics used, and not in regard to the morality of the actions, which I don't feel like getting into at this point.
Iran gave the US 72 hours' notice of the attack. This was all show.
"Iran sent hit men after journalists."
Um, how is that different from the United States sending cruise missiles after terrorists in Afghanistan? Or the United States sending special forces after terrorists in Pakistan? Or the United States sending drones after aid workers (oops!) Or Israel sending rockets after Iranian generals in Syria? I think governments do whatever they can get away with, justifying it with the "national defense" narrative. I would very much like my government to stop acting like a rogue nation and start acting legal and with high moral principles, then we could criticize Iran for violating them. But I can't seem to make that clear to my Fearless Leaders ...
Well, words can cut like a knife. So assassinating journalists here is just like the US killing terrorists.
So, a Brazilian MMA fighter understands more about economics and monetary policy than the Fed/Powell and most Harvard "economists"?
Sounds about right.