No Ice Cream Price Gouging Thanks to Substitutes
Unilever’s split from its ice cream division shows market share and market power are very different concepts.

Following anemic sales growth of 1.8 percent in 2023, Unilever announced its separation from its ice cream division on Tuesday.
Increasing its share of the ice cream market from 16 percent to 20 percent over the past decade, Unilever's ice cream brands included Ben & Jerry's, Magnum, Wall's, and Cornetto. Unilever's ice cream division accounted for 13 percent of its revenue in 2023, with the rest coming from consumer staple brands like Dove, Comfort, TRESemmé, Vaseline, Liquid I.V. (a favorite of college students who totally respect the legal drinking age) and—Hellmann's Mayonnaise?
Unilever has quite the diversified (and eccentric) portfolio of products.
Despite its impressive market share, Unilever's ice cream division experienced the firm's highest input-cost inflation last year, making it more of a liability than an asset. In an attempt to remain profitable, Unilever instituted cost-cutting measures and across-the-board price increases.
The first strategy proved ineffective: Despite 7 percent growth in the consumer staples sector between 2019 and 2024, Unilever's own share actually decreased by 8 percent.
The second strategy also fell flat: After raising the average price of its offerings by 13.3 percent in 2022, sales decreased by 3.6 percent and 1,500 of its 128,000 employees were fired. Although consumer welfare was initially reduced by Unilever's price hikes, so too was producer surplus in short order.
Unilever's decision to fire 7,500 more employees coupled with its divestiture from its ice cream division constitutes its latest bid to cut costs, saving the company a projected $870 million over the next three years. Given CFO Fernando Fernandez's nod to the importance of artificial intelligence in Unilever's "comprehensive technology program," it comes as no surprise that CEO Hein Schumacher anticipates layoffs impacting those in "predominantly office-based roles."
What may come as a surprise to Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Chair Lina Khan and the neo-Brandeisians (mis)managing the FTC is the fact that even huge, horizontally integrated firms like Unilever cannot raise prices without decreasing quantity demanded. This is especially true when it comes to those goods for which demand is relatively elastic.
Consumers will happily hand over a couple bucks to sate their Chunky Monkey craving, but they're not going to pay much more than that; they'll satisfy their sweet tooth with cheaper ice cream, substitute with a Kit Kat, or forgo the (relative) luxury altogether.
In markets where own-price elasticity is high and substitute goods abound, market share does not translate to market power.
Speaking of Chunky Monkey, Unilever's sale of Ben & Jerry's bodes well for those uneasy about the increasingly politicized marketplace. Ben & Jerry's opted to differentiate their overpriced, punny ice cream flavors through active participation in the political controversy du jour: vocally supporting Black Lives Matter in 2021 and refusing to sell in the "Occupied Palestinian Territory" in 2022. The Vermont ice cream chain went so far as to sue Unilever to prevent it from selling distribution rights to Israeli licensees.
Apparently, hot political takes don't pair well with cold ice cream.
Though Ben & Jerry's corporate activism undoubtedly contributed to its relationship with Unilever melting, it was probably not determinative. Pointing to "lack of overlap on supply chains with the rest of the company," Schumacher explained the benefits of horizontal disintegration from all of its ice cream brands, not just Ben & Jerry's. When cost-saving synergies no longer compensated for increased input costs, the profit motive naturally incentivized Unilever to downsize and delimit its focus.
Less of an instance of "get woke, go broke," Unilever's divestiture from its ice cream brands is more so evidence that the size and extent of a company has little to do with its pricing power.
FTC, take note.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Anyone remember Pulp Addiction? That was some good stuff.
There are many brands that are better quality and lower price. Hmm.
But do they come with political antisemitism like Ben and Jerrys?
Isn't that what the peanut swirled into some flavors is?
A lot of stupid supporters of Israel boycotted Ben and Jerry's and bought a different Unilever brand instead.
I don't consider this to be particularly stupid.
Even if a parent company's total profits remain the same, they're still going to notice that one of their subsidiaries making a specific product is generating significantly less profits than another division selling that product, and is likely to allocate executive bonuses and layoff targets accordingly.
I boycotted Ben & Jerry's
now I buy Store brands
without the cute names.
Chunky Monkey was named after Jeff.
now ice cream is a luxury.
I eat ice cream a few times per month and I can't always tell the difference between the store brand and the name brand.
For simple flavors like chocolate or vanilla I can’t tell the difference. In college I used to get a pint of chocolate ice cream for 99 cents that I would get really baked and eat. Hagen Daz or something like that was 3-5$ a pint at the time.
I easily tell the difference.
In the past few years generic ice cream has actually gotten way better. Just before Covid there was actually a huge boom in generic ice cream offerings with really exotic flavors and high quality premium brands appearing out of WalMart and Kroger of all places. Covid kinda killed a lot of the exotic stuff but a half gallon of Great Value vanilla or chocolate still won't do you wrong. Most of what you get out of the upmarket brands is more adventurous flavors and mix combinations. The flavors are one thing, but "ice cream mixed with caramel/waffle cone bits/cookie etc" is really just a way to replace the relatively expensive ice cream with less expensive (by volume) mix ins. Cookies and Cream is delicious, but let's be totally honest here. From a business standpoint, the cookies are a filler.
I never could....
This isn’t an endorsement of Stephen Colbert(I can’t stand his CBS show), but his Ben and Jerry’s flavor is by far my favorite. It has chunks of waffle cone covered in fudge in it. It’s kind of like eating a nice ass ice cream cone from an ice cream parlor.
Figures you’d eat ice cream made on stolen Indian land. Colonizer.
The East India Company makes ice cream? I don’t think I have ever had British ice cream. Is it any good?
Do you trust Lucas refrigeration?
(there is a reason they drink warm beer)
Isn’t that why the India pale ales are so damned hoppy? Preservation for the trip around the horn?
Plus, the sailors won’t be tempted to drink it.
That’s exactly why. I like IPAs so I won’t fault the Brits for that one.
Abenaki Tribe Demand Ben & Jerry's Pay Reparations for 'Stolen' Land
In a July 4 message, professional virtue signalers and occasional ice cream makers Ben & Jerry's said the U.S. had been "founded on stolen Indigenous land" and asked others to "commit to returning it."
Turned out its Burlington, Vermont, headquarters sits on land stolen from the Abenaki.
Hilarity ensued when the tribe took the poseurs at their word and asked for the land back.
Totally unexpectedly Ben & Jerry's didn't give the land back.
Most British ice cream is worse than USA's cheapest supermarket brands.
I'm glad they sell Haagen Dazs here!
Not an ice cream guy, but I do use both TRESemmé and Vaseline.
At the same time?
“Though Ben & Jerry’s corporate activism undoubtedly contributed to its relationship with Unilever melting, it was probably not determinative.”
Well, it’s the reason I haven’t bought their products (thereby supporting their fascism) for decades.
The wife and I started our boycott in 2020, after the told us they hated us. But the damage was done. Pretty sure I single handedly kept them afloat through the 00s getting their peanut butter cup and strawberry cheesecake varieties.
How did they tell you they hated you?
They hated on America and Whitey for social credit points:
“What happened to George Floyd was not the result of a bad apple; it was the predictable consequence of a racist and prejudiced system and culture... What happened to George Floyd in Minneapolis is the fruit borne of toxic seeds planted on the shores of our country in Jamestown in 1619... Today, we want to be even more clear about the urgent need to take concrete steps to dismantle white supremacy in all its forms... Unless and until white America is willing to collectively acknowledge its privilege, take responsibility for its past and the impact it has on the present, and commit to creating a future steeped in justice, the list of names that George Floyd has been added to will never end...."
https://www.benjerry.com/about-us/media-center/dismantle-white-supremacy
“Though Ben & Jerry’s corporate activism undoubtedly contributed to its relationship with Unilever melting, it was probably not determinative.”
Wishful thinking or copium?
I'm guessing wishful thinking.
It's a college kid writing the article. He did OK for his lack of perspective.
It played and plays a part....
The author is clearly an economics major, from his correct use of multiple concepts of the field. Not something you see too often.
Does that mean that Breyers will go back to the old recipe?