The New York Times Implausibly Implicates Oklahoma's Bathroom Law in the Death of a Nonbinary Student
Don’t let culture war politics overwhelm a commitment to the facts.

Nex Benedict, a 16-year-old Oklahoma student who identified as nonbinary and preferred they/them pronouns, died on February 8, a day after a fight at Owasso High School. It is unclear whether the injuries that Nex suffered in the fight contributed to their death. But in a story published on Wednesday, The New York Times implicitly blames the altercation on an Oklahoma law that requires students to use restrooms that correspond with the sex "identified on the individual's original birth certificate." Details that the Times omitted cast doubt on that framing, which The Independent also pushed in a story headlined "Oklahoma Banned Trans Students From Bathrooms. Now a Bullied Student Is Dead After a Fight."
Nex, whose given name was Dagny, was biologically female, and the fight happened in a girls' bathroom, where Nex and another student reportedly were assaulted by "three older female students." Although Nex apparently was bullied for identifying as nonbinary, it looks like the location of the fight was incidental.
That is not the impression left by the Times story. "Anti-Trans Policies Draw Scrutiny After 16-Year-Old's Death in Oklahoma," says the headline. The subhead adds that "the student, who did not identify as male or female, according to their family, died a day after an altercation in a school bathroom." The story is illustrated by a photo of transgender rights activists during a 2023 demonstration at the Oklahoma Capitol. "Under state law," the caption notes, "students must use the bathroom that aligns with their birth gender."
Even though that is what Nex was doing at the time of the fight, the second paragraph again cites the law as if it explains the altercation: "Under an Oklahoma law passed in 2022, students must use the bathrooms that align with their birth gender." The next paragraph notes that the fight happened "in a girls' bathroom at Owasso High School" but does not acknowledge that Nex was complying with the bathroom law, perhaps because that would require acknowledging Nex's "birth gender." Although that information is clearly relevant in this context, the story does not mention it at all.
Reporters J. David Goodman and Edgar Sandoval return to the subject of state policy later in the story:
The death renewed scrutiny of anti-transgender laws passed in the state and rhetoric by Oklahoma officials, including the state superintendent for education, Ryan Walters, whose agency has been forceful in trying to bar what it calls "radical gender theory" in schools.
"It's dangerous," Mr. Walters said in a video made by the agency last year. "It puts our girls in jeopardy."
The video highlighted a fight in a bathroom the previous year in which, according to a lawsuit, a female student was "severely" injured in a fight with a transgender student.
Advocates for nonbinary and transgender students said that the state's policy on gender and bathrooms had led to more reports of confrontations in schools.
"That policy and the messaging around it has led to a lot more policing of bathrooms by students," said Nicole McAfee, the executive director of Freedom Oklahoma, which advocates for transgender and gay rights. Students who do not present themselves as obviously male or female find themselves questioned by other students, they said. "There is a sense of, 'do you belong in here?'"
The cause of Nex's death remains unclear. The New York Post reports that Sue Benedict, Nex's grandmother and guardian, said Nex fell and hit their head during the bathroom fight.* The Post also quotes the mother of the other victim, who reported seeing the assailants "beating her head across the floor." But according to a statement that the Owasso Police Department posted on Facebook yesterday, preliminary autopsy findings indicate that Nex "did not die as a result of trauma." The statement adds that "toxicology results and other ancillary testing results" are still pending and "the official autopsy report will be available at a later date."
Nex was examined at Bailey Medical Center the day of the fight and released that night. After coming home, Sue Benedict told the Times, Nex "complained of a sore head." The next day, "Nex collapsed at home and was rushed to the hospital." In an interview with KWGS, the NPR station in Tulsa, on Tuesday, Benedict complained that "school staff didn't call an ambulance" and that "medical professionals performed a cursory exam before discharging Nex." But Benedict also said "she is not certain yet how much [the] altercation contributed to Nex's death."
Whatever the cause of death, the case raises troubling questions about the response to the fight. "Students were in the restroom for less than two minutes and the physical altercation was broken up by other students who were present in the restroom at the time, along with a staff member who was supervising outside of the restroom," the Owasso Public Schools (OPS) said in a statement issued on Tuesday. "Once the altercation was broken up, all students involved in the altercation walked under their own power to the assistant principal's office and nurse's office."
What happened next? "Physical altercations between students are unacceptable," OPS said. "Any student/s engaging in such action, jeopardizing the safety of others, will receive disciplinary consequences. These consequences can include out-of-school suspension for a first offense. Due to federal privacy laws, we are unable to disclose the exact nature of disciplinary action taken against any student." But Sue Benedict told The Independent that school officials "informed her Nex was being suspended for two weeks."
Under "district protocols," OPS said, "the parents/guardians of students involved in a physical altercation are notified and informed of the option to file a police report should they choose. Should they choose to file a police report, school resource officers are made available to the parents/guardians either at that time or they can schedule an appointment, if they choose, at a later date. These practices were followed during this incident."
The afternoon of the fight, police say, "an Owasso School Resource Officer was assigned to respond to Bailey Medical Center where Nex Benedict was being examined. The School Resource Officer interviewed Nex and their parent concerning the altercation at the Owasso High School. The following morning, the School Resource Officer followed up with the parent." That same day, "Owasso Fire Department medics were dispatched to a medical emergency involving Nex Benedict, who was transported to the St. Francis Pediatric Emergency Room where they later died."
Police said they were "conducting a very active and thorough investigation of the time and events that led up to the death of the student." As of Tuesday, the Post says, "it remained unclear" whether Nex's assailants "would face charges."
More generally, the incident raises questions about Owasso High School's response to bullying. An OPS spokesman told the Times that "students who identified as transgender or nonbinary would be treated 'with dignity and respect, just like all students.'" But Sue Benedict said Nex had been repeatedly harassed by other students at school. "The Benedicts know all too well the devastating effects of bullying and school violence," the family said in a statement, "and pray for meaningful change wherein bullying is taken seriously and no family has to deal with another preventable tragedy."
Did Oklahoma's policies encourage such violence? Goodman and Sandoval clearly think so. "In addition to the bathroom law," they note, "Oklahoma passed a ban on gender-transition care for minors last year. And in 2022, the state was among the first in the nation to explicitly prohibit residents from using gender neutral markers on their birth certificates." They also think it is relevant to note that "the state education agency" recently appointed "Chaya Raichik, who runs Libs of TikTok, an account on X that has posted anti-gay and anti-transgender content, to serve on the agency's Library Media Advisory Committee, which reviews the appropriateness of school library content."
The implication is that state policies are reinforcing the intolerance from which Nex suffered. Maybe. But anyone who has attended high school can testify that teenagers do not need official encouragement to pick on students they see as different. And in this case, the bathroom law that the Times repeatedly highlights seems like a red herring.
*CORRECTION: This sentence has been revised to reflect updated information about Sue Benedict's relationship to Nex.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"It is unclear whether the injuries that Nex suffered in the fight contributed to their death."
It's not unclear. The NYT is double-lying.
https://nypost.com/2024/02/22/us-news/nonbinary-student-nex-benedicts-death-was-not-caused-by-injuries-from-school-fight-police/
"The death of 16-year-old nonbinary student Nex Benedict was not caused by injuries sustained in a fight in a school bathroom the day before, authorities said Wednesday.
A preliminary autopsy report by the medical examiner’s office indicated the Oklahoma teen did not die from trauma, Owasso police said."
" . . . further comments on the cause of death are currently pending until toxicology results and other ancillary testing results are received"
It appears that it was a possible OD or suicide.
So you’re sayin there’s still a chance they can milk this into a #TransFloyd event?
The narrative is set. They will milk it regardless of changing facts.
They will milk it regardless of
changing factswhether or not the nipples are attached to a man.FTFY
Gross but fair.
The tragedy is the woke cheerleading for mental illness.
People are either binary or disordered.
Get over it.
>>#TransFloyd event?
careful with that axe, Eugene.
Interesting thing in the NY post article is the texts where she tells a friend the reason she got 'jumped' was because she threw water onto one of the girls. Seems kind of important that she started the fight.
Not to mention the fact that trannys consider anything less than performative celebration of their mental illness to be "bullying."
Not to mention that female non-binary specifically indicates trying to deliberately miscue this sort of situation, in the moment, with the intent to play it to their advantage after the fact.
Oh, geez. The trans community activists would NEVER do a thing like that.
I mean, they would never, ever, use something for outrage.
Yeah, the ones I've run into like to get in your face and try to provoke you into saying or doing something they can misconstrue and abuse you with.
Like the joke about Vegans. How do you know someone is a vegan? Don't worry, they'll tell you within a few minutes of meeting them. Same with the sexual freaks.
the reason she got ‘jumped’ was because she threw water onto one of the girls.
Transphobes hate that.
Well according to the article she was suspended by the school so they apparently believed she was an antagonist and not a victim in the altercation. That may or not be true but it looks like the story is more complicated than her mother would like.
They have zero tolerance rules. Even if you get jumped the standard practice is to discipline you if you did anything to fight back. It wasn't quite as bad when I was in school, but they threatened to suspend me after I was attacked at my locker (in fairness, I had been running my mouth beforehand)
I was in high school in the 80s. Pretty much the same deal. A kid punched me in the back in Geometry class. I picked up a chair and hit him with it. They wanted to suspend me for a week and the other kid would get nothing. My dad went in and yelled at the principle and got it 3 days suspension for each of us. That kid didn't like me very much after that. But he didn't try any shit.
The one thing I'll say is that, if she did hit her head, there might have been a chance of an aneurysm, but she wouldn't have died from being concussed.
We know it wasn't suicide, because the mother would have jumped on that if that was the case, since it ties into the bullying narrative. But the chances she's trying to make her into the Pooner Matthew Shepherd--another case where the facts didn't fit the narrative, but became the cause celebre for gay activism in the 90s--are pretty high.
It seems that the water-throwing incident was in response to previous bullying.
Let's not make assumptions about "who is to blame". From where we sit, we cannot possibly suss out the truth of the whole thing.
Statute of limitations on replying to a bullys assault is maybe 15 minutes at best. It's like disciplining a puppy for pooping in the house. If you don't rub it's nose in it right away it does nothing for purposes of training. Either beat the shit out of the bully then and there or get the fuck over it.
I should have read before commenting. Knew there was more going on, but it doesn't fit the narrative
Came to say the same. Sounds like she initiated the confrontation.
It appears that it was a possible OD or suicide.
A girl gets bullied by other girls until one of them ODs?
[crosses arms with barbecue tongs in hand Gillette 'toxic masculinity ' ad-style]
Girls will be (mostly) girls.
^^ people who don't understand playground rules often go to far.
I do think we need to see the toxicology report before jumping to that conclusion. Too many details of the fight are missing and they strangely avoided a cause of death. Give me a cause of death related to internal injury or concussion and I'll further entertain the theory that the fight was a cause. Give me some indication of prior drug abuse and I'll lean towards an OD. I'll even entertain some sort of accident or exposure to dangerous substances (like CO) as a cause. The missing information and one-sided narrative here suggests to me that she was probably the one who provoked the fight and also that it had nothing to do with her death. Somehow Sullum in trying to check against their misleading narrative crafting has engaged in the same due to his own woke-influenced assumptions
Isn't it just standard operating procedure to perform a toxicology analysis even if there is no suspicion of overdose?
No. Ask Mrs. Scalia.
I think we cal all agree, when a psycho narcicist dies, society wins
Yes, because after that happens, we no longer get Trumpled Underfoot!
Is this your suicide note? { finally to be rid of this hideous perverted moral monster !!!]
Jacob Sullum is a discredited Trump supporter that has no business being published here. He's FAR from being rational or a supporter of liberty. Here he shows his right-wing bias by simply ignoring the truth that what adults do and say has a direct impact on what kids do and say. When adults get murderous in their attitudes it rubs off on kids - I've seen it real-time myself when I was that age. I grew up in the Deep South during racism so don't try to tell my differently, I saw it and lived with it. Here Sullum shows he simply hates LGBTQ+ people and is comfortable with trans kids getting beaten up in school and potentially killed.
Fuck Sullum. End of story.
Jacob Sullum is a discredited Trump supporter
I remember my first beer. Welcome to Reason.com! Read literally anything written by Sullum before this post and it will disabuse you of this notion.
Of course you don't get to decide when it is "End of Story", particularly when you use a logical fallacy to declare the story false,
Jacob Sullum is a discredited Trump supporter…
Were you born yesterday, or did you just discover Reason like 2 minutes ago?
Jacob Sullum has one of the worst cases of TDS of the entire Reason writing staff. It’s well-known and has been well-documented for years.
Old-timers know Sullum as a Trayvon-Truther.
There has to be a limit on parody accounts, right?
It's asymptotic, unfortunately.
"The preliminary autopsy" Was not actually released. And is preliminary. Some cop made a claim about the preliminary autopsy. Cops regularly lie or use deceptive language. For instance a cop could say "indicated" simply becuase there was more than one noted injury or medical issue. That in no way closes the issue. You'l notice no medical professional made any claim. So your use of "lie" on the subject is at least as innacurate as the original report itself that you termed a lie.
It’s not unclear. The NYT is double-lying. … It appears that it was a possible OD or suicide.
Yeah, this is a pretty clear case of “I can neither confirm nor deny…”/unspoken truth between the lies retardation.
If her skull, several ribs, several vertebra were all fractured there would be no need for a tox screen to determine what killed her. If she got in the fight, went home and took a bunch of pills to the point that you have to wonder if the fight killed her or not well…
Maybe there’s a case that the drugs she took beforehand and the drugs she took afterwards as a result of the fight killed her or the drugs she took thinned out her blood to the point that injuries sustained in the fight caused her to hemorrhage fatally. However, still, if you punch me in the head and I go take a borderline lethal stack of warfarin and aspirin that causes me to bleed into my skull and die, you didn’t kill me, the aspirin and warfarin did. Even if you caused the bleeding, you had no idea what drugs I was on or would do subsequently.
Even with the story as "she fell and hit her head during the fight" it seems evident the fight had little to do with her death.
Feels an awful lot like we're waiting on the tox screen to determine whether Jackie Coakley was fatally raped through broken glass coffee table.
There was no non-binary student because there's no such thing as non-binary.
"The New York Post reports that Sue Benedict, Nex's mother, said Nex fell and hit their head during the bathroom fight"
hit HER head. don't succumb to their game sully.
You lying sack of shit.
"Misgendering" in print can be punished in at least two states I know of. New York and California. There are probably more. Not to mention foreign countries that probably would be allowed to seek damages under the Biden Admin. Thus publications have to play it safe and use the "preferred pronouns" or face large fines.
""the student, who did not identify as male or female,"
Last time I checked, schools usually don't have non-binary/gender-neutral restrooms. So, I'm guessing that absent this restroom law, she would go into whichever restroom was closer.
That was my thinking as well, which bathroom would they have been using absent the law?
One would assume it's still the women's. Less stalls in the men's bathroom and probably way more piss on the seats. Unless the girl used that funnel thing she wasn't using a urinal.
People need to stop the charade. You can't choose male or female. I don't care what clothes you wear, but you can't change the facts.
Learn something about human biology before you open your mouth and prove beyond any doubt how unintelligent and uninformed you are.
We know about human biology and how chromosomes control which sex (there are only two) you are. You are an idiot.
Has biology changed that much since I took it in 1985? At that time there were, in mammals at least, only two genders. Egg carriers and sperm injectors. There were no other options. Fish and frogs had some weird exceptions but they were quite firm on mammals.
Yeah, she would never have been bullied in a boys' room. Nobody ever has been bullied in boys bathrooms at school.
Truth be told, I'm sure the bullying is much worse in the girls' restroom.
Nowadays, you're probably right.
That’s almost certainly true. Toxic femininity.
There is no more cruel human, on average, than a 13 year old mean girl. They will pick at any weakness, are relentless, and try to destroy a rival's entire reputation.
Which is weird because seven to nine year old girls are some of the kindest, most compassionate people there are.
Not really. 7-9 year olds aren’t thinking of how to get the alpha males to mate with them. 13 is when those instincts start to develop.
I grew up with all sisters, can attest.
Don't have to add the "mean girl" part. They are all fucking evil. They also don't change much over the next 40 years...
You mean to tell me that regime media is a rotting corpse?
I have seen the use of the term 'regime' around here before. Where did this come from? This is referring to the government? Why refer to the government as 'regime'?
Perhaps you think you can get away with pretending you are that stupid, but I will enlighten bystanders who you confuse.
"Government" has a secondary meaning of "the people in power" as when they talk of a "government falling" when the prime minister loses a no-confidence vote or an election. This usage is not restricted to parliamentary systems.
"Regime" refers to the same meaning: the people in power, as opposed to the minor bureaucrats who take phone calls to fill potholes, issue dog licenses, and file forms.
So why use 'regime' when 'government' has the same meaning? Is it to imply that the government is authoritarian and illegitimate?
“Government” has a secondary meaning”
Doubles down on playing stupid.
Why do you choose to use the word 'regime' when the word 'government' would suffice? What is the additional meaning you wish to convey with the use of the word 'regime' instead?
Why do you choose to use "choose" instead of "select" or "pick"?
Why do you choose to use "use" instead of "utilize"?
Why do you choose to use the unnecessary "the word" in front of the quoted words "regime" and "government"?
Why do you choose to use "suffice" instead of "be sufficient"?
The world does not wonder.
Okay, if you insist, I'll answer your four questions.
Why do you choose to use “choose” instead of “select” or “pick”?
Because 'choose' is grammatically more correct.
Why do you choose to use “use” instead of “utilize”?
Because it is less wordy.
Why do you choose to use the unnecessary “the word” in front of the quoted words “regime” and “government”?
To emphasize that I am referring to the word choice and not the concept to which each word refers.
Why do you choose to use “suffice” instead of “be sufficient”?
Because it is less wordy.
There, happy?
Damn you're a sucker.
Why?
Why do you think, hmmm?
Jeff was being retarded on purpose.
I don't understand the point you were trying to make. But whatever. I answered your questions, hope you're happy.
You didn’t answer my question.
Most people use contact as a verb. It is not. Make contact. My contact. The contact. That's the proper use.
Was Victoria Nuland part of the government during Trump’s administration?
Is Obama currently part of the government? Is John Brennan part of the government?
I believe the answer to all three of your questions is "no". What is your point?
Four further questions await your insightful reply.
How many times can a sea lion jump on one breath?
We're about to find out.
His obvious point is that someone can be in a position of power and influence over the government, and therefore part of the regime, even without technically being a government officer.
I'll ask you the same question.
How does Obama, now, have power over you?
"someone can be in a position of power and influence over the government, and therefore part of the regime, even without technically being a government officer."
Hey chemjeff radical individualist, your four questions continue waiting. Wassamatta, cat got your tongue?
They’re part of the regime.
So you are referring to people who do not hold formal power yet still have some measure of influence over the government? Okay, fine. But so what? Sure it's easy to imagine that Obama's advice on a particular topic will carry some weight in certain circles. Ultimately though Obama can't do anything with any power. If Obama advises Biden to do something, and Biden does it, that's on Biden for accepting that advice and using his formal power to implement that idea, not on Obama for giving it. What is the point of recognizing these people outside of government?
Lol. Classic Jeffey.
How does Obama, now, have power over you?
Hey chemjeff radical individualist buddy ole boy, those questions are still unanswered.
Do you really think Biden is running the executive branch?
Well, I don't think any president truly "runs" the executive branch, it is just too big, so every president must necessarily delegate a great deal of authority to advisors. It would not surprise me to learn that Biden has delegated more than most considering his mental state.
Do you think Obama (still) runs the executive branch?
To some extent, yes.
How so?
Here’s Lying Jeffy pretending he wants to understand a certain perspective, but the rest of the thread shows he really doesn’t.
No, I do. But you are doing your best to sabotage it.
If your definition of 'regime' does not agree with Vernon's, then why not point that out instead?
Funny how libertarians might use terms indicating they disdain the government or people in power. It just makes no sense!
Why would Jeffy know anything about what libertarians think?
What would you know about it?
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/tu-quoque
Fine, then your response to me is an ad hominem, insulting me by suggesting that I am not actually a libertarian.
I just asked a question.
Ha right. It was an insult packaged within a question.
What? Vernon stole one of your tricks, Jeff?
He's not pretending. He's really that stupid.
I know, but it's fun to give him an opening to look even stupider.
He's not pretending
The term 'regime' strongly implies authoritarianism.
Right - a 'regime' in my mind, when referring to a government, implies that it is not just authoritarian but also illegitimate.
It's always 'regime' change. Never 'democratically elected government' change, or 'dickbags we put into power' change. 'Regime' means bad guys. Them.
Bad guys. You.
Good guys don't remove their opponents from a ballot. Regimes do.
Good guys don't use political lawfare against their political opponents. Regimes do.
Good guys don't censor speech. Regimes do.
'Regime' implies order or structure. As it's the root word for regiment.
For example, someone could have a 'training regime', or a 'health care regime'.
Wasn't gonna say anything. But ill add regime to words sarc doesn't know.
At this point, it may be far more productive to make a list of terms Sarc actually understands. It's probably much smaller.
*types "define regime" into google*
Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
re·gime
/rāˈZHēm,rəˈZHēm/
noun
1.
a government, especially an authoritarian one.
"ideological opponents of the regime"
Similar:
government
authorities
system of government
rule
reign
dominion
sovereignty
jurisdiction
authority
control
command
administration
establishment
direction
management
leadership
2.
a system or planned way of doing things, especially one imposed from above.
"detention centers with a very tough physical regime"
Add the concept of multiple definitions to the long list of ideas that Jesse, ML, ICP and the rest of the idiots (they know who they are) can't grock.
"The term ‘regime’ strongly implies authoritarianism."
Apparently it's you and jeff who don't understand multiple definitions.
Did you read your post?
Multiple definitions. You chose one. Ignored the others. Then accused others of what they meant when it was obvious to everyone else.
When talking about governments, the use of the word ‘regime’ is most likely meant as a system or planned way of doing things.
Check.
Add context to the list of concepts you can't grock.
So you’re asking us what we mean when we use the word, but then you decide which definition and context we’re using it.
In other words, when you guys act like you’re trying to understand why we’re using the word, you’re lying.
And you double down on being wrong.
Going great today sarc.
"Add context to the list of concepts you can’t grock."
I guess it would be pedantic to point out that it's "grok", not grock. But since sarcjeff are being pedantic AF in this discussion, it seems fair.
Today, Jeff says something stupid, and sarc goes all in to defend it.
Tomorrow, sarc will say something stupid, and jeff will go all in to defend it.
Today was Jeff's serve, in a game of ping pong played by idiots.
They have no tribe!!!!
What was stupid about it? It is a legitimate question. The word 'regime' has multiple meanings and it is used rather frequently now usually by those on the right. I don't travel in right-wing circles, I don't read their blogs or follow their tweets, so I'm asking what is the deal with the use of this word.
I usually just say 'Administration', myself. But I think it's pretty popular on either side of the aisle to refer to an administration that you don't particularly agree with as a 'regime'.
It's not inaccurate. I don't recall seeing anyone losing their minds or anything when people referred to the Trump Administration as the 'Trump Regime'.
Do you use the word 'regime' to describe the government when you like the people who are in power?
No?
Why is that?
You're ass-u-ming he likes any government in power.
But that is not how many people in this discussion are defining the word 'regime'. They are using it to describe people outside of the administration who have power or influence over the government.
So I suppose that would be like referring to Sean Hannity as part of the "Trump regime".
People referred to Limbaugh the same, so again, nothing new.
You think Hannity has more power than Obama?
Nobody believes that. This is why you’re called Lying Jeffy.
Well, I picked Hannity for a reason.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/05/sean-hannity-donald-trump-late-night-calls.html
While he was president, Trump and Hannity would talk on the phone nightly, sometimes many times a day. That certainly sounds like influence to me.
So why wouldn't Hannity during the Trump presidency meet your standard of 'regime'?
And no I didn't say Hannity has more power than Obama. That was you dishonestly putting words in my mouth. Liar.
My claim is that based on the definition you all gave me for 'regime', Hannity would count as part of the 'Trump regime' during Trump's presidency. Seems straightforward to me.
But if I'm wrong, please explain why I'm wrong.
Dumb as fuck or dumb on purpose?
So when a private citizen has access to the president, to the extent that the two have nightly phone calls, that person should not be considered part of the 'regime' even though that person has way more influence on the president than the vast majority of other private citizens.
It is starting to sound like your term of 'regime' only refers to left-leaning people.
Subtitle of your link:
“Life inside the bunker of Fox News’ resident Trumplegänger”
But it gets better from there:
The call to the White House comes after ten o’clock most weeknights, when Hannity is over. Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday, Sean Hannity broadcasts live at 9 p.m. on Fox News, usually from Studio J in midtown, where the network is headquartered, but sometimes from a remote studio on Long Island, where he was raised and now lives.
All White House phone numbers begin with the same six digits: 202-456. Hannity calls the White House switchboard, a number listed publicly, and reaches an operator. The operator refers to a list of cleared callers, a few dozen friends and family members outside the administration who may contact President Donald Trump through this official channel — among them his adult sons, Eric and Don Jr.; private-equity billionaire Stephen Schwarzman; media billionaire Rupert Murdoch; real-estate billionaire Tom Barrack; Patriots owner and also-billionaire Robert Kraft; and Hannity.
The operator then dials the president, who leaves the Oval Office around 7 p.m. and who, by this point in the evening, is almost always by himself on the third floor of the executive residence (the First Lady reportedly sleeps in a separate bedroom). He tells the operator to put Hannity through.
Their chats begin casually, with How are yous and What’s going ons. On some days, they speak multiple times, with one calling the other to inform him of the latest developments. White House staff are aware that the calls happen, thanks to the president entering a room and announcing, “I just hung up with Hannity,” or referring to what Hannity said during their conversations, or even ringing Hannity up from his desk in their presence.
Trump and Hannity don’t usually speak in the morning, which the president spends alone, watching TV and tweeting. During the first months of the administration in particular, the tweets launched at the beginning of the day landed like bitchy little grenades directed at the programming and personalities that angered him on MSNBC and CNN. “Early on, usually we could count on the president watching Morning Joe first thing, at 6 a.m.,” one White House official told me. “He’d watch an hour of that. Then he’d move on to New Day for a segment or two. Then he’d move on to Fox.”
Senior staffers worried about this pattern of behavior: By the time his day was formally under way with the daily intelligence briefing in the Oval Office — scheduled as late as 11 a.m. — the whole world was often thrown off course, wondering whether there were “tapes” of his conversations with a fired FBI director (May 12, 2017, 8:26 a.m.) or if a TV host had been “bleeding badly from a face-lift” at Mar-a-Lago (June 29, 2017, 8:58 a.m.).
Yes Lying Jeffy, this story is convincing that Hannity has as much influence as Obama, Nuland, and Brennan.
You’re a fucking retard if you believe this. But I don’t think you do, I think you’re a disgusting liar.
I never said that Hannity had "as much" influence as Obama, Nuland or Brennan. That is a strawman that you invented.
I am willing to believe that Obama, Nuland or Brennan have more influence now than Hannity had on Trump. I am simply pointing out that, I think, Hannity falls under Vernon's definition of the term 'regime'.
I am starting to get the impression that 'regime' is a derogatory term that you only apply to the people you don't like, and that even if it applies to a person on your team, you object to the use of the term even if it fits.
“and that even if it applies to a person on your team”
You just can’t help yourself. It’s pathological.
The word ‘regime’ has multiple meanings and it is used rather frequently now usually by those on the right.
Seriously? "Regime" has regularly been referenced in the news in this exact same context since at least the Vietnam War era. If anything, it has seen fewer references since becoming very overused during the invasion of Iraq when "regime change" was all the rage.
You seem so very desperate for validation. Maybe you should take a break from Reason.
Let me clarify - it seems to be used rather frequently now usually by those on the right to refer to our own government.
Geez you're ignorant. I've used it in reference to management at places I've worked. Sportsball players and fans use it to talk about management. It means what it means, and you trying to pretend you don't understand it just makes you look like the fool you are.
jeffsarc now pretending that using the word regime to refer to a US administration is somehow unseemly.
Just for fun, I went to the WAPO site, and typed the word regime into the search engine, and saw a number of references to the "trump regime" I expect I could get similar results at most sites, left and right.
Why do you care?
I simply find it curious that this term is used so routinely now. I'm asking what is the additional meaning you wish to convey by referring to the government as a 'regime'. That you merely don't like them? That you think they are authoritarian? That you think they are as authoritarian as, say, some third world dictatorship? That you think they are illegitimate?
This is another example of you pretending to be offended by a common practice, similar to your fake pearl clutching about “dehumanizing language” and “language of genocide.”
Give us a break.
I didn't say "offended". That is you projecting onto me what you think I mean.
You didn't say offended, but you acted offended.
Again, give us a break.
I read an article recently that described a phenomenon where if you repeat a word a bunch of times in a row, it will suddenly lose meaning to you. Found it here:
Words Seem to Lose Their Meaning When We Repeat Them Over and Over. Why?
I am not saying that has happened to Jeffy. He is just being a disingenuous cunt.
It’s pretty obvious when they said they wanted to understand why people were using that word they were lying.
They just don’t like us using it. Kinda like how sarc gets upset when we accurately call out fascism.
Oh, I forgot you’ve been gone for awhile. You missed sarc getting very upset several times when people accurately described fascist actions by the regime.
Here is the thread.
https://reason.com/2023/12/12/texas-abortion-law-test/?comments=true#comment-10354105
One of many.
Now they’re doing the same with the word regime. And Lying Jeffy is comparing Obama’s power to Sean fucking Hannity.
And you’ll note he ignored “ex” CIA agent Brennan and Victoria Nuland.
Then you all need to clarify what you mean by 'regime'.
Vernon defined it as:
“someone can be in a position of power and influence over the government, and therefore part of the regime, even without technically being a government officer.”
So it sure seems like Sean Hannity, with his nightly personal phone calls to the president, certainly would count when Trump was president.
I'm not saying that Obama or Nuland or Brennan wouldn't count under your definition. I'm asking why Hannity wouldn't count under your definition.
What influence do you think Obama has over the government right now?
You first Lying Jeffy.
What influence do I think Obama has over the government? I don't know. I really don't. I don't keep up with what Obama is doing. All I know is that he still lives in DC. I am sure he probably gives advice and has a perspective that others are willing to listen to.
What influence do you think he has?
I see that there is a recent article in which the Obama people and the Biden people disagree about Biden's re-election strategy.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/01/14/biden-obama-2024-00135446
Okay, fine. Is this type of thing what you are referring to?
If you really can’t understand the difference between Hannity and Obama, Nuland, and Brennan, I don’t know what to tell you.
Although I don’t believe you can’t.
Sarc is not a facist he just wants the combination of goverment and corporate power!
That the people with the power and influence to rule over us through government power are not limited to those who hold government offices.
With the way the story is framed, one wonders if the beatdown this girl would have received in the boys bathroom might have been worse.
Or were the girls who allegedly beat her to death trans-women? Would would add an additional layer of irony for sure.
Yeah, funny thing with the LGBTrans stupidity I linked above. Your average 16 yr. old girl would have the decent sense not to splash water and pick a fight with a group of boys in the boys room and the average boy, if a girl accidentally splashed water, and admitted it was accidental, would between politely excuse the issue, profusely apologize for getting in the way of her water, or even encourage more splashing... but butch retards gotta butch retard.
This seems more like a school fight that got out of hand, rather than some direct result of a stupid bathroom law.
I'm really sick of these stupid bathroom wars. Why not just have one bathroom? Men, women, trans, nonbinary, whatever, can use it. Have stalls, urinals, open troughs, whatever.
Only partially joking here.
I had to explain the old stadium-style troughs to my wife once. She was mortified.
It was worst at Wrigley - they had double-sided troughs at one point.
Lol, yep, those are the exact ones I described to her.
omg that is awful.
Grow up.
I think we had those in the barracks when I was in basic at Benning. Maybe it was only in the field training sites. It's been... well... a long time.
That must have been awful. Being a cub fan is the pits, always knowing your inferior to the south siders
We actually have gender-neutral and unisex toilets in existence, and the trans-advocates have made it very clear that these do not meet their demands. They want to go into the other restroom.
Remember when the proponents of gay marriage said these things would never happen?
Yes, the Slippery Slope.
Well, I believe that these things *wouldn’t* have happened, outside of a decidedly inorganic/astroturfed “trans movement” being originated and amplified by those with an agenda to demoralize and destabilize our nation.
Trans folk are not that organized. Most are not wealthy, and much of their day-to-day energy is spent navigating their own personal challenges of health, appearance, interpersonal/social relationships, and survival. No way that they formed a powerful nationwide coalition amongst themselves and “made it happen”.
If it had been organic, the leaders/originators of that movement would be widely hailed.
No, someone else has been pushing that cart forward.
Oh here we go. There's a SINISTER PLOT to DESTROY AMERICA using transgender bathrooms as the vehicle of destruction!
That's only one small aspect of the war to destroy our society. It just gets lots of press because of the shock value to normal people.
Who's the ringleader of the plot? Where are the meetings held?
If I thought you were genuinely curious, I’d try to explain it to you. It’s clear you’re not.
Stay safe Lying Jeffy!
Harvard.
TRUST TOP MEN!
Well, I can understand that. It probably makes them feel stigmatized that they have to use "that one bathroom". But we all have to compromise a little bit.
Problem with that is that some people still have this silly notion that biology actually matters. Biology! How quaint.
Problem with that is that some people still have this silly notion that biology actually matters. Biology! How quaint.
Biology relates to sex. Gender is not sex.
If gender isn't sex, then they don't need the reconstructive surgeries or hormone injections.
Excellent point! There is a difference between having different genders and body dysmorphia. Body dysmorphia is a mental disorder (and I do not mean that as a pejorative - it is a disorder in that the "mind" has a disconnect with the "body"). You can be more or less masculine and more or less feminine and fluid in your sexual proclivities - that's gender. Body dysmorphia is something different yet the public parlance has conflated the two.
we all have to compromise a little bit
Literally Hitler transphobe.
Nah.
"Everyone who disagrees with me is Literally Hitler"
Shutting down Drag Queen Storytime at your local library is way different than putting people in gas chambers.
THINK IT THROUGH.
Where's the sarcasm button?
Shutting down Drag Queen Story time at your local library is way different than putting people in gas chambers.
Ha! My twin sons' mother and I took the boys to drag queen story time in Ptown frequently when they were kids. Now they play college football and ooze heterosexual masculinity.
And everybody clapped.
Considering the parents, it's not a surprise they ended up retarded.
Was that before or after you took them to feild trip to pluto?
My twin sons’ mother and I took the boys to drag queen story time in Ptown
...aaaaand I think we're done.
College football requires college education. Unless they Doogie Howarded their way into college around ten years old that makes them in their 20s.
The term "kids" is used for offspring younger than their teens.
Thus you has Drag Queen Story Hour in "ptown" whatever that is, over 10 years ago? I have a hard time believing that. I may need a link to prove that existed.
I won't ask you for proof of the twins or their college records.
"But we all have to compromise a little bit."
I'll bite --- why?
Because we all have to coexist on some level in shared public spaces.
You are the one demanding a massive change with no input from others.
Why should we not just tell you to go fuck off?
You have to provide a reason for this massive change. You have never once done that.
Because people will have sex in them.
Okay, that is true for the male bathrooms in a lot of parks, but it's the main reason they are.
Beyond that, men can use urinals, women generally can't. You can get like 2 urinals for every toilet, more if they use troughs like in old stadiums
more if they use troughs like in old stadiums
Seriously though, do you know of any modern restroom that has a trough?
No, but I imagine they are still a viable option where there are a lot of men drinking a lot.
We could bring back the vomitorium and solve another problem at the same time.
A vomitorium is an exit to a stadium.
There were troughs in the local bars back in the day. Drunks have notoriously poor aim. Of course the urinal stalls have pretty much eliminated any size comparison disputes so that's an improvement.
I saw one in a Zaha Hadid building in Germany.
The last time I "saw" one was in an episode of American Dad, wherein Steve asked a stranger why he was standing so close to him, given the length of the trough. To which the gentleman replied, "Oh, I'm the weird one? You haven't peed one drop since I've been watching."
The last one I saw was Sun Devil Stadium ~1999.
still there for the 2004 Fiesta Bowl ...
Williams-Brice Stadium (S Carolina Gamecocks) had them as recently as 2005.
They should put a trans bathroom in the Gamecocks stadium and just have the sign on the door read, "Girlcocks."
People use shorthand "bathroom" but the bigger issue are actually locker rooms and open showers in schools.
Women have a need and a right to have single-sex spaces where they can be together, even those that have nothing to do with elimination or disrobing. Men pretending to be women need to be kept out of those spaces.
Perhaps because women don't want to be ogled by men?
The New York Times lying is not news.
It is the ordinary course of events.
" It is unclear whether the injuries that Nex suffered in the fight contributed to their death. "
Another victory in the war against grammar.
Grammar is racist.
Grammar lesson compliments of Merriam Webster: (https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/nonbinary-they-is-in-the-dictionary)
We recently announced the addition of the nonbinary use of they—that is, they as it's used to refer to a single person whose gender identity is nonbinary—and a lot of people had some questions, "why?" being primary among them.
The answer to that question is no different than it is for any other word. All new words and meanings that we enter in our dictionaries meet three criteria: meaningful use, sustained use, and widespread use. Nonbinary they has a clear meaning; it's found in published text, in transcripts, and in general discourse; and its use has been steadily growing over the past decades. English speakers are encountering nonbinary they in social media profiles and in the pronoun stickers applied to conference badges. There's no doubt that it is an established member of the English language, which means that it belongs in Merriam-Webster's dictionaries.
Nonbinary they takes a plural verb, despite its singular referent, which can make the grammatically conservative uncomfortable. It's helpful to remember that the pronoun you was initially plural, which is why it too takes the plural verb even when it's referring to a single person. "You are" has, of course, been perfectly grammatical for centuries, even when the "you" is an individual.
The language's lack of an exclusive gender-neutral pronoun is a famous deficit, and they has been quite ably filling in for more than 600 years. Its use largely goes unnoticed in such constructions as "No one has to use it if they don't want to"—a use that has long been covered in our dictionaries—and it's quite possible that the nonbinary they is headed for a similarly unremarkable fate.
Yes, we know you cultural Marxists like to change definitions.
Geez fuck, whose sock puppet is this?
I mute the trolls for a reason, then I don't bother them. They should just stick to their name and remain a grey bar.
Apropos of nothing, there’s a hotel in Louisville (can’t remember the name) where the lobby men’s restroom has the urinals mounted on a one way mirror wall, looking out into the lobby. Pretty good test of your self confidence.
Until someone unexpectedly turns off all the lights in the lobby and people realize one way mirrors are really one way at a time mirrors
A number of regional (Mid-Western-ish) sports bars, some I believe partially-owned by Jerome Bettis, have a habit of making the mirror behind the bar one-way glass so that you can stand at the urinals, in the bathroom behind the bar, and still watch the game(s).
I read the NYT morning briefing every day just to see how whacked out (biased) they are. It is beyond Pravda and I’m amazed that anyone is dumb enough to believe what they print.
chicks ...
One also has to wonder if she was driven to this by being named after an Ayn Rand character
At the risk of pointing out the obvious, the child pictured above is obviously a female human being. A creature commonly referred to as a girl in the English language. When discussing these creatures in the third person the language provides popular universal pronouns to describe them. She/her. The language also provides pronouns for more than one individual and when referring to individuals whose gender is unknown, they/them. There is no question about the gender of the child in the photo. She is a girl. The transgender cult insists that we participate in their dishonesty. Sorry. I'm a conscientious objector.
"The New York Post reports that Sue Benedict, Nex's mother, said Nex fell and hit their head during the bathroom fight"
Were two people attacked in the bathroom?
Why is the author using these ridiculous plural pronouns?
Merriam Webster answers your question:
A Note on the Nonbinary 'They' (It's now in the dictionary.)
(https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/nonbinary-they-is-in-the-dictionary)
We recently announced the addition of the nonbinary use of they—that is, they as it's used to refer to a single person whose gender identity is nonbinary—and a lot of people had some questions, "why?" being primary among them.
The answer to that question is no different than it is for any other word. All new words and meanings that we enter in our dictionaries meet three criteria: meaningful use, sustained use, and widespread use. Nonbinary they has a clear meaning; it's found in published text, in transcripts, and in general discourse; and its use has been steadily growing over the past decades. English speakers are encountering nonbinary they in social media profiles and in the pronoun stickers applied to conference badges. There's no doubt that it is an established member of the English language, which means that it belongs in Merriam-Webster's dictionaries.
Nonbinary they takes a plural verb, despite its singular referent, which can make the grammatically conservative uncomfortable. It's helpful to remember that the pronoun you was initially plural, which is why it too takes the plural verb even when it's referring to a single person. "You are" has, of course, been perfectly grammatical for centuries, even when the "you" is an individual.
The language's lack of an exclusive gender-neutral pronoun is a famous deficit, and they has been quite ably filling in for more than 600 years. Its use largely goes unnoticed in such constructions as "No one has to use it if they don't want to"—a use that has long been covered in our dictionaries—and it's quite possible that the nonbinary they is headed for a similarly unremarkable fate.”
Fancy english professors are now pushing that black people should absolutely be (B)lack people.
The christian moral majority was replaced with what is postmodern woke PC culture. All the experts agree on all kinds of stupid shit. Its up to you to decide if wearing shoes on your hands or drinking with your ass unstead of your mouth is prudent because some mental freaks rose to power and a bunch of experts agreed with them to virtue signal. If the mob is telling you water is in fact not wet and they have 1000 experts drinking that kool aid, its up to you to parse out that they are retarded and it is in fact wet.
Fancy english professors are now pushing that black people should absolutely be (B)lack people.
Cruel irony, as English professors should be the ones pointing out that that the word black is very poor descriptor and completely unnecessary in most cases.
As concerns North America, I disagree. Here, "Black" refers to an actual subculture, a sub-nationality, created and maintained by slavery and segregation. I don't begrudge them a capital B.
Your confusing black with nigger
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=f3PJF0YE-x4
No, I'm not.
Wow. I completely missed the news about the hand shoes and the ass drinking.
If you get your way, I guarantee you’ll be against the wall before I am.
Dictionaries are descriptive, not prescriptive. They describe how people currently use words. If enough people use a term in a way that is incorrect or nonsensical, that usage will enter the dictionary.
Yeah, like using vaccine to describe an injectable that does nothing to prevent a viral infection.
Airborne Fizzy Tablets are a vaccine now. They should add that to the label. It would sound better than a teacher got tired of getting colds when they flew.
Yup, and the meaning evolves and that's how it is with language. Dictionaries don't cause the meanings of words to evolve, people do that.
And sometimes, the people are wrong, and a term "evolves" into something incorrect or nonsensical, that is subject to legitimate disagreement and criticism.
You commies aren’t really people.
Yes, thus a language devolves into nonsense. Decimate as a synonym for devastate is a good example of that devolution. I've had some idiots claim that "could care less" means the same as "couldn't care less" because language evolves.
Can confirm. The word "ain't" is even in the dictionary.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ain%27t
Dictionaries were descriptive, now they're prescriptive.
FTFY
Say, did you guys hear the story about how the Lakewood trans shooter had a Palestine sticker on the gun? That he / she put antisemitic rants on social media, including a not so veiled threat to shoot pro Israel demonstrators with the very gun used in the church shooting?
But wait a minute. What happened? Where's the media outcry on the squad and the pro Jihad Harvard kids for their violent rhetoric? Why do women's group remain silent on Palestinian Shrek voting "present" on condemning Hamas rape.
How strange. It's almost as if the media biased, and the left only cares about "equity" or "diversity" for only SOME group of people. You learn new things every day.
The left is completely unabashed about having different standards for different people. They make no pretense about everyone being equal. That’s why they demand “equity” rather than equality.
When you marginalize everyone else, then the left is actually the center. See how that works?
That's not an exaggeration, either--it's what Kimberle Crenshaw promoted in "Mapping the Margins."
How dare you!
Our official state religion tells us that all gun bullet shooter types are MAGA white males indulging their primitive urges for genocide. It is entirely proper for NYT, WAPO and other church newsletters to keep our narratives pure.
"The implication is that state policies are reinforcing the intolerance from which Nex suffered. Maybe."
This sums it up nicely, and everything that came before it is biased speculation beyond the level of any similar alleged bias in the NYT or the Independent. Kids will be kids, yes, and they get into fights at times. When adults (politicians, school boards, state legislators) behave badly by passing laws that silence the voices of families (children and parents) that are experiencing medically documented gender non-conformance (not sex non-conformance), in order to allay the irrational fears of the ignorant, it goes without saying that your average school-girl/boy bully gets new material to work with, and new innocents to victimize.
The toxicology this writer refers to in an effort to infer that the deceased child may have been an illicit drug user is despicable wishful thinking.
To the commenter who suggested that Nex started the fight because they threw water at another student, where, exactly, were you standing when you confirmed that water being thrown was the very first action or statement leading to the fight.
Google "gender vs. sex." One's gender is in their brain; one's sex is in their pants. Good news: Though trans hate is the new right-wing wedge issue. It'll certainly fade away just as the same sex marriage issue did. Then we can get back to being communities of kindness, acceptance, and equity until some politician offers up the next wedge to divide us for political gain.
>>trans hate is the new right-wing wedge issue.
projection always easier than amateurjection.
Trust me, but feel free to verify. Start here if you like: https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-politics-and-policy/transgender-people-gop-candidates-find-latest-wedge-issue-rcna17933
Sure, the "right" wing is the part of our society doing the most wedging and dividing. But you be you.
You're right. And, thanks for the permission to be myself.
Liars gotta lie.
Yes, shitlibs don't like it when they're insane theology is resisted.
When adults (politicians, school boards, state legislators) behave badly by passing laws that silence the voices of families (children and parents) that are experiencing medically documented gender non-conformance (not sex non-conformance), in order to allay the irrational fears of the ignorant, it goes without saying that your average school-girl/boy bully gets new material to work with, and new innocents to victimize.
Oh come on. I seriously doubt that a fight in the bathroom is motivated by some stupid bathroom law. Your claim is basically projecting adult politics onto these kids. Yes the bathroom laws are stupid, but sometimes a fight is just a fight.
Sometimes a fight is just a fight, but in this case, a student lost their life. I agree with you that these bathroom laws are stupid (thanks for saying so). You don't think that parents political biases filter down to their kids, and if trans people are being talked about negatively at home that kids inclined to bully wouldn't bring it into school? Similar to the fact that adolescent school mass murderers typically have "gun enthusiasts" for parents.
Sure it is possible that these kids got into a fight over political disagreements about the bathroom law, or because the bathroom law triggered some bigoted response in kids. But I think it is FAR more likely that they got into a fight over petty kid things, like about 99% of the fights involving kids.
Similar to the fact that adolescent school mass murderers typically have “gun enthusiasts” for parents.
Cite? Because that is almost certainly pulled straight out of your ass.
The most striking similarity between school shooters is the early use of antidepressant drugs.
Cite?
PROTECTING AMERICA’S SCHOOLS
A U.S. SECRET SERVICE ANALYSIS
OF TARGETED SCHOOL VIOLENCE
https://www.secretservice.gov/sites/default/files/2020-04/Protecting_Americas_Schools.pdf
(Page 22) FIREARM ACQUISITION: From the Home: Nineteen attackers (76%) acquired a firearm from the home of a parent or another close relative. In half of the firearms cases (n = 12, 48%), evidence indicates the firearm was either readily accessible, or it was not secured in a meaningful way. For example, some firearms had been kept locked in accessible wooden or glass cabinets, locked in vehicles, or hidden in closets. In four cases (16%), the firearms were kept in more secured locations, but the attacker was still able to gain access to them. In these instances, the firearms were secured in a locked gun safe or case, but the attackers were able to gain access to them because they knew the combination or where the keys were kept, or they were able to guess the password or combination. In three cases, it is unknown if the firearm had been secured.
So you're saying all firearm owners are "gun enthusiasts"?
Did I?
:::Checking:::
Nope. I didn't say that.
Yes, you did.
"Similar to the fact that adolescent school mass murderers typically have “gun enthusiasts” for parents."
Then you cited this:
"Nineteen attackers (76%) acquired a firearm from the home of a parent or another close relative."
No, I never said “all firearm owners are ‘gun enthusiasts.'” You quoted what I said and it wasn’t that.
> I’ll change “enthusiasts” to “owners,” (though I’ve never been a gun owner precisely because I’ve never been enthusiastic about such ownership). If more than 3/4 of adolescent school mass murderers obtained their gun(s) from a parent or another close relative, I’d say that qualifies as “typical.”
Well if you can't trust Google...
Good point. Search it in Duck Duck Go.
Well if you can’t trust Microsoft…
Agreed. The "trans" nonsense is a passing fad that will fade away.
^ What folks said about the push for legal same sex marriage, legal recreational marijuana use, women voting and having credit cards in their own name, and the Black civil rights movement.
Names? Cites?
"gender non-conformance" has been around like...forever? It doesn't need to be medically documented. Throughout human history there have been great grandmas who were tomboys as a child and great grampas who played with dolls. Nobody freaked out about. This girl claims to be non binary a category of human being being that only happens in the event of chromosomal abnormalities. But she still has her sex in her pants. Glad to hear that. We can like it or not but our biology precedes us by millennia and the biological clock is a much more powerful force than gender dysphoria or social contagion. It's likely that if this girl's illusions were not indulged by the adults in her life she'd be figuring out how to be an adult woman and would probably have succeeded. In any case we don't know if her delusions had anything to do with the fight or her ultimate death. What we do know is that the transgender cult is eager to exploit this tragedy to promote their agenda.
"This girl claims to be non binary a category of human being being that only happens in the event of chromosomal abnormalities."
Wait. Are you talking about intersex? 'One of these things is not like the other.' There's actually a definition for 'non-binary.'
Just because it is defined does not mean it isn't imaginary. I can find a definition of a unicorn. I will never be a unicorn.
The person in question was a girl. She identified sexually as non-binary. Which is fine, and probably completely irrelevant.
The person in question was a girl. She identified sexually as nonbinary. Which is fine, and probably completely irrelevant.
The person in question was (allegedly) assigned female at birth as a result (presumably) of possessing female genitalia. Their sex at birth was declared by an obstetrician to be female.
Nex identified their gender as nonbinary (not fully a girl and not fully a boy or possibly even no gender at all) from their core beliefs and feelings about their identity. Nex's core beliefs about their identity may have changed as they matured. Nex may have eventually concluded that they were a trans man and might have abandoned they/them pronouns for he/him/his, or they may have ultimately identified as a cis woman and adopted she/her/hers—or they may have identified as nonbinary indefinitely. This is internal to Nex and it has absolutely no relationship to what anyone else thinks based on their rigid embrace of the gender norms of Western society or their intrusive demands that everyone in Western society follow them.
Whatever Nex may have ultimately decided, Nex would have always known that their sex was female, but that would be irrelevant because in a free society Nex can decide how to physically present in public: what name to be known as, what clothing to wear, what mannerisms to employ, and what affirming surgical procedures to undergo.
Having used the fake term “cis,” everything else you’ve typed can summarily be ignored, troon.
Dagny wasn't "assigned" as anything, actual human biology created her that way.
Having used the fake term “cis,” everything else you’ve typed can summarily be ignored, troon.
— Cis: An actual word in the dictionary.
— Troon? Are you a golfer, "Red?"
Dagny wasn’t “assigned” as anything, actual human biology created her that way.
— "Sex assigned at birth:" The actual correct term.
— https://youtu.be/qO-U2WlgroQ?si=GgCcKdRCyHQMOukZ
Cis: An actual word in the dictionary.
A made-up word by lefty activists.
— “Sex assigned at birth:” The actual correct term.
"Sex documented at birth:" The actual correct term.
I'm good wit dat.
Because that's the biological reality, not what your cult brainwashes these kids into thinking they're "born in the wrong body."
“not what your cult brainwashes these kids”
Pretty sure BJPG is one of these brainwashed kids.
Doctor: Well I'm no expert but (opens anatomy textbook) that looks like a vagina to me. What have you got?
Nurse: We've got the pre natal testing and the chromosomes match up with your observation.
Doctor: Well I've got this damn birth certificate but I'm reluctant to make the call. I mean what if this baby's gender doesn't match it's chromosomes? What if this creature has no gender at all?
Nurse: Maybe we should get a second opinion.
Doctor: OK somebody call Dr. Jones. She's always looking for billable hours.
"It’s likely that if this girl’s illusions were not indulged by the adults in her life she’d be figuring out how to be an adult woman and would probably have succeeded."
Didn't they say the same thing about gay kids a long, long, long, LONG time ago?
Some people said that, but they were wrong. Today, the people saying men can have babies are full of shit.
Males cannot have babies, for sure, but trans men can get pregnant and have babies. #TheMoreYouKnow...
"Trans men" are women.
@Vernon, Trans men are biological females. I’m pretty sure they don’t deny that. They don’t identify as the male sex, they identify as men. Who would you be to deny that a person feels the way they feel? I guess it’s OK that you don’t like it, but why would you think you should have any say in how some other person identifies?
To clarify, we’re not talking about biology here, we’re talking about a person’s core beliefs about their identity—how they feel about who they are, how they dress or what appearance they present in public.
Medical science has determined that a person identifying as a gender that is different from their biological sex is not “mental illness.” The “mental illness” is the distress they experience as a result of the mismatch between their biological sex and their gender identity and from the (often raging) disapproval of society. That distress is called “gender dysphoria” effective with DSM-5, which replaced “gender identity disorder.”
https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/diversity/education/transgender-and-gender-nonconforming-patients/gender-dysphoria-diagnosis
Quoted from the above link: “With the publication of DSM–5 in 2013, ‘gender identity disorder’ was eliminated and replaced with ‘gender dysphoria.’ This change further focused the diagnosis on the gender identity-related distress that some transgender people experience (and for which they may seek psychiatric, medical, and surgical treatments) rather than on transgender individuals or identities themselves.
The presence of gender variance is not the pathology but dysphoria is from the distress caused by the body and mind not aligning and/or societal marginalization of gender-variant people. It needs to be ego-dystonic to qualify as a diagnosis and having a discussion with our patients about the diagnosis prior to charting it is necessary and good care.
The DSM–5 articulates explicitly that “gender non-conformity is not in itself a mental disorder.”
Good discussion. What other questions do you have, Vern?
If you don't see what's wrong with sexism, encouraging delusional thinking in young people, and poisoning and mutilating people in pursuit of trying to reify their delusion, then I'm at a loss as to how I would explain it to you. There's something very wrong with your brain.
To be clear. Some adult women are attracted to other adult women. We call them lesbians. They've been around like...forever? But the vast majority are not delusional about their sex. Being gay is not a delusion. Gender dysphoria is.
@Gaear, Transgender people aren't "delusional" about their sex. They understand biology. They know they are biological females. This is separate from their core identity as having a gender that differs from their biological sex. Gender dysphoria is not a delusion, it is a DSM-5 diagnosis that describes the mental distress experienced by trans people whose core gender identity (which they generally cannot change) differs from their biological sex and from the maltreatment they experience from society (which maltreatment you are demonstrating in your above statements).
Perhaps it will help you understand if you take note of the generally accepted terms related to this subject. The terms "male" and "female" describe biological sex. Transgender people don't usually say that they identify as male or female; they are more likely to say they identify as a man or a woman (or in the case of children, a boy or a girl). They're not telling you what their sex is, they're telling you what they feel like in their core identity (gender identity).
The dictionary may not have totally caught up with this, but that's not a denial of the reality. Sex is biological and immutable: male or female (or intersex). Gender is the term trans people use to communicate how they feel, which often corresponds to how they wish to appear in public by way of dress, jewelry, makeup, or whatever. Many, but certainly not all trans people will seek some degree of surgical treatment to assist in matching their appearance with their perceived gender (which they presumably hope will help to alleviate their mental distress: dysphoria).
Think about it for a moment: if a trans woman can achieve an appearance that "passes" your test of what a woman should look like, and you have no idea that you're looking at a trans person, that person won't need to worry about your misguided disdain, and you can both go about living your lives. The trans person won't be triggered into a state of dysphoria and you won't be triggered into a state of "trans panic."
There is no such thing as "gender".
Then we can get back to being communities of kindness, acceptance, and equity until some politician offers up the next wedge to divide us for political gain.
This has always been a retarded talking point.
"I'm for good!"
5 minutes of hate later:
"Fuck'em."
Maybe you should challenge the premise that people are good intrinsically.
This has always been a retarded talking point. “I’m for good!” 5 minutes of hate later: “Fuck’em.” Maybe you should challenge the premise that people are good intrinsically.
Whoa. Sorry, there’s just too much to unpack here with this one, but as the dad of an intellectually disabled son, would you mind not using the offensive and dated word, “re*****d?” Thanks in advance, @Nobartium.
Doing anything you ask or demand is retarded.
“Sorry, there’s just too much to unpack here”
Are you returning from a long vacation, or admitting you’re a simpleton, retard?
So you want Nobartium to say it's an intellectually disabled talking point?
Woof, lot of the usual Current Year passive-aggressive buzzwords there.
Google “gender vs. sex.” One’s gender is in their brain; one’s sex is in their pants.
In that case you will agree that sex, not gender should determine the use of restrooms, locker rooms, showers, and which sports team to play on. But that puts you on the side of "trans hate" according to activists.
After all, they continuously argue in court that "on the basis of sex" means "gender identity".
@John, LOL. OK, yeah, you raise good points, but fail in your "conclusions." You really should try hard to get over this rest room panic you're experiencing.
The dictionary may not have totally caught up with this, but that’s not a denial of the reality. Sex is biological and immutable: male or female (or intersex). Gender is the term trans people use to communicate how they feel, which often corresponds to how they wish to appear in public by way of dress, jewelry, makeup, or whatever. Many, but certainly not all trans people will seek some degree of surgical treatment to assist in matching their appearance with their perceived gender (which they presumably hope will help to alleviate their mental distress: dysphoria). If their appearance matched their perceived gender and you couldn't tell they were trans, they wouldn't have to put up with your freak-out.
I've never been inside a public women's rest room, but I assume there are no urinals. If a trans woman uses a women's rest room, she's gonna use a stall like all the other women. Now, as long as you don't follow her in there and peek through the crack, then both of you can just continue on with your day.
In that case you will agree that sex, not gender, should determine the use of restrooms.
If you follow that to it's logical conclusion, you'd run into a big problem with trans men or trans women who have fully transitioned and cannot be "detected" as trans, causing quite a stir in the rest room you want them to use.
John, here's an example of a trans man who would cause some serious concern if he tried to use a public ladies room:
https://www.boredpanda.com/transgender-man-before-and-after-jamie-wilson/
And here are a bunch of examples of trans women who would be ill advised to use a public men's room:
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/transgender-girls-inspiring-transformations--43769427619991211/
What are your thoughts?
trans men or trans women who have fully transitioned and cannot be “detected” as trans
Such people are rare. In most cases the cosmetic results of "transitioning" are not good enough to fool anyone. "Trans women" look like a guy in a dress. "Trans men" look like a woman dressed as a teenage boy.
Haha, You must realize there's no way you could know how many fully passing trans people you see in a typical year.
You're fantasizing. "Fully passing", for most people, is a cruel lie.
You just talked about the difference between sex and gender, and how no one is disputing that sex cannot change. Isn't it odd how the article you posted uses "Female to Male Transition."
But that's the term for it you might say. And that is my point. The transgender movement activists are intentionally interchanging the terms between sex and gender, if one subscribes to gender being a distinct thing.
I don't hate trans people. I feel sorry for them. What's the word for having pity for a person who has been victimized by activists and therapists? Transpitiful? Transpity?
"students must use the bathroom that aligns with their
birth gendersex"Fixed it.
I bet we can freak out enough younger kids so they never actually use the bathroom at school.
Lots of them are in diapers anyway.
'Don’t let culture war politics overwhelm a commitment to the facts.'
Don't you mean, don't let facts overwhelm political religion and a commitment to delusional beliefs?
If the autopsy ruled out trauma as a cause they likely ruled out an epidural hematoma (which is the common cause when someone has head trauma, then a lucid window without symptoms, then sudden death). It would be fairly obvious and the first thing they would look for.
My money is on OD. Very sad. But we have a very clear connection between the gender cult and mental illness / suicide. It should be a cautionary tale for parents to steer far far away from the stuff
"My money is on OD. Very sad. But we have a very clear connection between the gender cult and mental illness/suicide. It should be a cautionary tale for parents to steer far far away from the stuff."
The connection you speak of has to do with non-acceptance at a vulnerable time in a kid's life, first by immediate family, and then by communities and society. That's what drives adolescents into mental illness and suicidal ideation. If parents, school systems, and communities want to keep their kids emotionally healthy and alive, they need to "steer" right toward "the stuff," and show love and support. Steering away = rejection of your child.
"The connection you speak of has to do with non-acceptance at a vulnerable time in a kid’s life, first by immediate family, and then by communities and society."
If your survival is predicated on people buying into your delusions, that is a classic "you" problem.
Nobody owes you anything. And given how often trannies are quite rude to others, my empathy for them as a group is low.
"If your survival is predicated on people buying into your delusions, that is a classic “you” problem."
There are way too many facts and there is way too much scientific knowledge out there now to still be using the word “delusion.” We’re talking about a parent’s emotional acceptance and support of their child and how critical that is to them becoming well-adjusted adults (whether trans, nonbinary, or cis). Why does non-conformance with gender norms seem to make you so angry?
"Nobody owes you anything. And given how often t******s are quite rude to others, my empathy for them as a group is low."
In 2024, I should think that assigning some negative trait to a class of people would be universally condemned, but I’m well aware that you have lots of company in your contempt. I would never hold the prejudice that others in your class are as rude as you’ve shown yourself to be right here.
We’re talking about a parent’s emotional acceptance and support of their child and how critical that is to them becoming well-adjusted adults (whether trans, nonbinary, or cis). Why does non-conformance with gender norms seem to make you so angry?
A parent's responsibility to guide their children, not enable them.
Why does resistance to your body dysmorphia cult make you so angry?
Acceptance of non-conformance with sex norms is the opposite of transgenderism. Transgenderism holds that one's thoughts and feelings and their expression must comport with one's sex and society's expectations of that sex, and if they do not, that is cause for dysphoria that must be corrected by acting to bring them into alignment. "Transgender care" is conversion therapy.
LMAO, my bad. I’m usually pretty quick picking up parody, but you got me. Well done.
Even if he's a parody, he's voicing opinions that many actually hold and need to be rebuked.
"There are way too many facts and there is way too much scientific knowledge out there now to still be using the word “delusion.”"
"None" is not my definition of "Too much", but you do you.
"We’re talking about a parent’s emotional acceptance and support of their child and how critical that is to them becoming well-adjusted adults (whether trans, nonbinary, or cis). Why does non-conformance with gender norms seem to make you so angry?"
Because it is a lie.
You also blamed SOCIETY for not playing with their delusion. Society owes you nothing. And given the sheer obnoxious amount of self-importance they present, trannies have less room than most to demand manners for their condition.
If a child decides that they need to remove an arm because they feel like somebody missing an arm, you'd be a monster to play along. If a child is anorexic, you'd be evil to say "Yeah, fatty, you got a point there".
You don't fix a mental issue by playing along with the delusion.
"In 2024, I should think that assigning some negative trait to a class of people would be universally condemned, but I’m well aware that you have lots of company in your contempt. I would never hold the prejudice that others in your class are as rude as you’ve shown yourself to be right here."
I'm not the one demanding you let a man be naked around your daughter. I'm the one saying playing along with the mentally ill is a bad idea.
Just because YOU think it is nifty to see the mentally ill kill themselves does not make it a necessity for me to join.
"If a child decides that they need to remove an arm because they feel like somebody missing an arm, you’d be a monster to play along. If a child is anorexic, you’d be evil to say 'Yeah, fatty, you got a point there.'"
I don't know you, damikesc, but I have a sense that you're pretty new to debating.
So, refute his point.
No valid point was made. Make a valid point.
So, you’re OK with cutting off a child’s arm if he identifies as one-armed?
It is amazing how an entire continent and multiple journals can expose your lie that acceptance reduced suicides, yet you persist with the lie.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36895315/
Results: Each category of adult and peer gender identity acceptance was associated with lower odds of a past-year suicide attempt, with the strongest associations within each individual category being acceptance from parents (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=0.57) and other family members (aOR=0.51). The TGNB youth who reported gender identity acceptance from at least one adult had one-third lower odds of reporting a past-year suicide attempt (aOR=0.67), and acceptance from at least one peer was also associated with lower odds of a past-year suicide attempt (aOR=0.66). Peer acceptance was particularly impactful for transgender youth (aOR=0.47). The relationship between adult and peer acceptance remained significant after controlling for the association of each form, suggesting unique relationships for each on TGNB youth suicide attempts. Acceptance was more impactful for TGNB youth assigned male at birth compared with TGNB youth assigned female at birth.
Conclusion: Interventions aimed at suicide prevention for TGNB youth should include efforts aimed at leveraging gender identity acceptance from supportive adults and peers in their lives.
It is amazing how an entire continent and multiple journals can expose your lie that acceptance reduced suicides, yet you persist with the lie.
Let me Google that for you: https://gprivate.com/69mm8
Google? I thought we were using duckduckgo? Come on man, stay on script!
🙂 😀 Seems like the lie was yours.
When I was a teenager I thought I was an android. Kids think fucked up shit when the hormones are raging and their feelings are out of their control. I guess if I were a kid today they’d be pushing me to get cybernetics installed.
I believe the whole idea of the law was to protect from girls being assaulted by boys. And this Nex person would never pass as a boy.
What statistics can you cite to document the prevalence of sexual assault in bathrooms by someone who is trans or pretending to be trans? You could ask the sponsors of the original bill, but don't hold your breath waiting for their answer.
The number of girls who have inserted their penises into other girls in a restroom or locker room is holding steady at zero.
So, no statistics. Seems like we're in violent agreement.
Girls don't have penises. I should have realized I would need to explain that to you.
VA showed that schools will simply opt to not prosecute a tranny who rapes in the bathrooms. But they will work with the DOJ to go after a father who was pissed that a tranny raped his daughter.
So, there's that.
Drug use in school bathrooms is prevalent. That's why school resource officers are standing outside bathrooms and searching kids before they go in.
** I have not read comments ** We should also not discount whether these “thorough” investigations are now going to be biased by the off-base media and public responses (including this article). If that child did in fact die bc of a beating she received at school, I strongly hope that the peers responsible are held as accountable as someone would be if they caused a same-gender peer’s death the same way. It seems unlikely that a healthy child would randomly die from something unrelated to head trauma from an assault hours prior, but if that is the case, I also strongly hope that if the bullying was due to being transgender or some misplaced fear that they were a threat to their peers, that the sociopaths (fact (and let’s face reality — who probably are being groomed for a future of pathologic senses entitlement)) involved are treated as such.
"I also strongly hope that if the bullying was due to being transgender or some misplaced fear that they were a threat to their peers, that the sociopaths (fact (and let’s face reality — who probably are being groomed for a future of pathologic senses entitlement)) involved are treated as such."
I love that trannies are always the victim.
Your use of parenthesis is confusing. Not to mention their content. "Groomed for a future of pathologic senses entitlement." Tell me spell check fucked that up 12 ways from Sunday because it makes no fucking sense otherwise.
Bottom line: She was a girl in the girls' restroom. "Transgender bathroom" laws have no relevance to this case.
She was a weird girl in the girl's bathroom, which exposed her to bullying girls. But at least she wasn't raped. What would have happened if she'd used the boy's room instead?
Are we ignoring the existing evidence about antagonizing people who could/would/did kick her ass and assuming she has the good sense not to antagonize 16 yr. old boys or no?
God the press lies and lies. LoTT doesn't post anti gay and trans content she only post pro gay and trans content and that's why they hate her. She exposes what they're saying in their little corner of the interwebs and it's bad.
Cultural appropriation!
I know this girl. You know this girl. Some of you may have even been this girl in some fashion. And we all know what happened.
It’s suicide.
It’s always suicide with the “nonbinary and transgender” crowd. Especially the GenZ’s. Which makes it all the more tragic.
We all know this girl. An awkward, insecure teenager looking for meaning and identity (and probably more than a little attention, if only to have her existence acknowledged), and falling prey to a highly seductive – to the point of predatory – social contagion that has somehow declared and empowered itself to be above criticism, rebuke, or even mere factual contradiction.
This is a girl who lost her way. And in trying to find it, fell prey to a cult. A cult where she had her head filled with nonsense, was welcomed and praised and mindlessly affirmed at every turn, and then had her identity rewritten for her – complete with they/them pronouns – and the command to reject anything, even reality itself, if it’s challenged even slightly.
This is a well-known, well-documented path to depression, self-loathing, and ultimately suicide. It doesn’t even matter what happened in the bathroom, we – as a society, and a culture – failed this girl long before she even got to school that day.
It’s sickening. The needless tragedy of it all should sicken you to your core. How the media (and politicians) uses it to push its enabler agenda should sicken you as well. And if it does – there’s good news, because there will be a reckoning for it. And I wouldn’t be surprised to see that it’ll be all these kids suffering these intentional abuses that lead the charge in a very near future.
And if it doesn’t sicken you… well, then God help you when they come to burn down your rainbow temples and take vengeance on those who socially, emotionally, and/or even physically mutilated them during their childhood. They’ll be adults soon enough, and they’ll soon realize what you did to them. And they will come for blood. And those who they come for will absolutely deserve it.
Miss Benedict, you deserved better. We failed you, and I’m sorry. I hope you have the peace now that you were deprived of in a life so needlessly cut short.
It’s pretty telling that the parents set up her obituary page with her actual name instead of her assumed one, and posted pictures from before she got sucked into the body dysmorphia cult.
Odds are her whole trans bullshit was totally inspired and supported by idiot adults at the school telling her that her parents don't care, don't understand and don't love her. That's EXACTLY what a teacher at my son's high school told a girl who was having identity issues.
Fucker should die for that. But he's a teacher so it's real hard to get him fired.
With it's unquestioning genuflection to the transgender cult, the US has become an outlier in the western world. In recognition of the real damage being done to these children the UK and Europe are shutting down this shitshow. Meanwhile outside of a few red states, government and media fully embrace an anti science, anti human agenda. Any parent who attempts to mitigate the damage to their child is at risk of having her/him kidnapped by the state. The cult will begin to crumble the way things usually get done in the US. Through expensive civil litigation. The cult creates new plaintiffs every day and those who were minors that can't legally sign a waiver will line up to be made financially if not physically whole. The Munchhausen moms won't be able to control them anymore. Even if they can't get their breasts and penises back the cynical perpetrators will be made to pay and the whole racket will become financially unsustainable.
Noted.
There is already a trickle of lawsuits against the mutilators in the pipeline. Over the next few years it will become a tsunami.
Nope.
Definitely. Most of these idiotic social movements that parents use to evade blame for fucking up their kids end up in court and then die out. Sue a few schools. teachers, councilors, therapists, doctors, nurses and hospitals and change happens.
Too bad a lot of low life lawyers will get rich off this.
I don't see suicide as such a bad thing. If you've sat through the first half of the movie and it's sucked you don't need to hang on to the end to be sure it sucked. Punch out.
People say that suicide is a selfish act. So fucking what? If you are suicidal because life blows chuncks odds are all those people who will claim to love you after your dead probably weren't really there for you when you were alive. If they aren't there for you when you're young odds are they won't give a shit when you are an adult. So if you've got a shit situation with the people who should care then fuck it. Punch out.
Life isn't special or precious. Two teenagers fucked up on meth can make a life. Frequently they do and those kids are pretty much doomed to a life of petty crime and shitty living. Again, if you're that kid, Punch out. It's not getting any better.
These kids who are so fucked up that they think joining the Alphabet Mafia is the way to get attention aren't going to have happy lives. If they get the meds and surgery they will spend the rest of their lives on medications and visiting doctors because their parents didn't care enough to make a fucking stand. Fucking Punch out. No reason to wait until Thirty to decide life sucks.
Justin Trudeau, is that you?
Make sure you explain that to her parents. I'm sure they'll find it a great comfort. Be sure to tell me if they were inattentive meth addicts.
What kind of life was this kid headed for as an Alphabet Mafia recruit? Is it a life that would be worth living?
We'll never know.
And that's kind of the thing you're missing - growth, maturity, hope.
Maybe, like most teenagers, she would have grown out of this fad and this phase. I'm 100% convinced that the extreme majority of these kids who think they're part of the hip socially contagious rainbow cult are, in fact, simply going through a phase. And just like the goth kids (or hippies, or skaters, or whatever) you grew up with in high school didn't stay that way as they entered into maturity and adulthood - this did not set their life path in stone as one consisting mainly of black eyeliner, spiked dog collars, and fishnets.
The problem, as you point out is that there's a big difference between goths and trans: which is that goths didn't have a coordinated effort of adults, institutions, culture, media, and politics affirming/ encouraging/ normalizing/ legitimizing it. With goth's we all just kinda rolled our eyes and waited a year or two until they grew out of it. With the rainbow garbage "progressive" society really DOES seem to want to lock that in and set it in stone. But that still doesn't mean we should treat a girl like this, who's had a sip of their kool-aid, as a lost cause beyond redemption and growth; as hopeless.
Maybe if these kids had more people stepping up to OFFER them hope, instead of writing them off and actively encouraging/affirming their suicide (which, honestly, how is that any better than what the alphabet mafia is doing - end of the day, it's still just a kid that's been destroyed) - well, like I said, that's where we as a society failed this kid.
Aren't you the Apostle of Foolishness... Immediately an attitude like yoursl means 'LIFE WILL SUCK" -- I come to you with a problem and tell me to hang myself. People like you do make the world hell.
Don't have children, you'll be poison to them
Nex should've used the boys room, instead?
We know a stupid unthinking Ayn Rand clone when we read this.
He should be one or the other. As it is he automatically doubles the nunber of potential haters. Now: Grow a mind, would you !!
Most parents can see there is something wrong with this child
The bathroom issue is what changed a famous ACLU mother, don't forget
ACLU Leader Quits After Daughters Encounter Men in the Women’s Restroom
IF you defend either the child or the attackers you can be sure you are a hateful bigot., There is the 3rd side that 90% of my neighbors and co-workers endorse: Allow parents to choose their school. You want your kid to be someone people will hate, there is a school that will accomadate you. But if you refuse that privilege to other parents, your 'not right' child will be attacked.BET ON IT.
Okay, to get and keep your great REASON job you had to forego parenthood but , still, consider : No parent seeing this child doubts that he is disturbed, not well, and on the path over the cliff