Texas Cops Held a Terrified Couple at Gunpoint After Raiding the Wrong House
Tyler Harrington has filed a lawsuit after four police officers burst into his home in the middle of the night.

Tyler Harrington and his wife were asleep in their beds when four Harris County, Texas, Constable Officers burst into their home and held the terrified couple at gunpoint. While the cops eventually realized they were in the wrong house, they didn't leave without admonishing the couple for keeping their door unlocked.
Harrington has now filed a lawsuit, arguing that the officers' invasion of his home was an unconstitutional breach of his Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable search and seizure.
On September 24, 2022, Officer James Lancaster responded to a call from a woman, named "Mrs. H" in the complaint, who said that she heard a knock at her back door. Lancaster spoke to Mrs. H and examined the outside of her property, finding nothing suspicious.
Mrs. H also told Lancaster that her daughter and her daughter's boyfriend would arrive to check out the house themselves. Mrs. H then decided to "get in her car and drive around until others came home." When Mrs. H's daughter and her boyfriend arrived, another neighbor, named "Mr. S," called the police to report their truck as suspicious. When talking to dispatchers, Mr. S accidentally gave the wrong address for Mrs. H's house, reporting Harrington's address instead.
Soon, two more officers arrived. According to the complaint, Lancaster clearly should have known that dispatch had been given the wrong address. While pointing to Mrs. H's house, he told the other officers, "That's the house with the person knocking on the back door, that was the house earlier….I checked the one across the street." In reference to Harrington's address, he said he had "never been to this house."
But the officers decided to enter the Harrington's home anyway, testing both the front and back doors and finding them unlocked. A fourth officer arrived, and according to the suit, Lancaster told him that they were "waiting on the owner," despite knowing that it was a different house than the one owned by Mrs. H, where the owner had left and was to return shortly.
Around midnight, two of the officers burst into the Harrington's home with their guns drawn, shouting "Constable's Office, come up with your hands out!" Harrington's wife, whose full name wasn't identified in the suit, was woken up by the officer's shouting. She confirmed that she lived at the house, and one of the officers, Jared Lindsay ordered her to get her ID and come to the door.
Around the same time, Lancaster entered the home with his gun drawn, shouting the Spanish phrase for "hands up," and began searching the home. As the officers held his wife at gunpoint, Tyler Harrington woke up and walked out of the bedroom, at which point the officers began pointing their guns at him as well, shouting questions at the couple.
Eventually, the officers realized they were at the wrong house but still led the couple back into their own home at gunpoint. After releasing the couple, Lindsay told them that "someone had reported people searching the front and back doors of this house," adding that the caller had told them the owner was gone.
After again confirming that the Harringtons were the owners of their own home, the complaint claimed that Lindsay lectured the couple for not keeping their doors locked, telling them "because when we see a door unlocked like that, we're gonna come in and make sure everybody's safe."
Several minutes later, the complaint alleges that Lindsay said of the couple, "Oh yeah they're gonna complain…they're gonna complain…we scared them."
"No reasonable officer could have believed there was probable cause to enter and search Mr. Harrington's house," the complaint states. "Defendants' flagrant disregard for Mr. Harrington's constitutional rights subjected him to agonizing emotional pain, fear, severe and ongoing emotional injuries."
Unfortunately, the Harringtons are far from the first people to be terrorized by police entering the wrong home. In 2020, Seattle police terrified an innocent woman when they burst into her apartment, which wasn't even in the same building as the apartment they meant to search. In 2021, Illinois police detained a family for over six hours when they executed a search warrant on the wrong house. And a report released last year found that Chicago police raided the wrong house over 20 times between 2017 and 2020.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
“”While the cops eventually realized they were in the wrong house, they didn’t leave without admonishing the couple for keeping their door unlocked.””
They were disappointed they didn’t get to break it down and stick the owner with a bill.
No, they were disappointed there were no dogs to shoot.
“because when we see a door unlocked like that, we’re gonna come in and make sure everybody’s safe.”
How do you “see” that a door is unlocked?
And if you can see it unlocked, what in the hell makes you think you can enter?
Finally, how much legal trouble is expected if you kill a couple uniformed home invaders?
And how the fuck can they think that entering with guns draw makes anyone other than themselves safe?
I had a cop tell that the obviously fake grenade hanging on my rifle rack “got his spider sense tingling”. Maybe these cops has a similar sense for unlocked doors.
This is why you should always trust government experts.
I used to think I was crazy to have long deadbolts, drop bars, and a steel door.
Now I think I will add grenade netting to all the windows.
My wife wanted a new front door for our house. She said I was crazy to want to build it like a vault door with several steel bolts throwing into a heave gague steel frame. We compromised on a normal door.
“Constable’s Office, come up with your hands out!”
So , is this a typo or did they really say it backwards like this ? Also, since when is leaving your door unlocked grounds for police to enter ? What is reasonable cause for that ?
Between that and the leading the family back into their house at gunpoint this sounds like something out of the files of Police Squad!.
They can start reversing words in commands regularly, just to keep suspects off balance.
“Put your hands on the floor and lie down on your head.”
“I’m gonna weapons you now for search.”
“I’m arresting you under place. You have silence to remain right.”
And for cops in Hawaii:
“Dan ‘em, Booko!”
Ban late night raids on homes. No need for it.
” In 2020, Seattle police terrified …:How many searches did the Seattle police correctly execute in 2020? “In 2021, Illinois police detained a family…..” DItto: How many correctly executed searches for the Illini police?? “….Chicago police raided the wrong house over 20 times between 2017 and 2020.” And how many times did the Windy City cops raid the correct house? Once again, the media seizes upon the sensational exception rather than the mundane quotidian.
The same wrong house 20 times?
Libertarians demand that government never make mistakes!
When you look out across the libertarian landscape and find no more foreign wars, no more corruption in the military industrial complex, no collusion between the government, big tech, and big pharma, no Chinese dissidents being silenced, no American dissidents be held without charge and awaiting show trials, nobody from Denmark to Sri Lanka having their farming methods banned, no national debts in excess of GDP, no cartels driving people from their lands or countries on the other side of the imaginary constructs struggling with how to deal with them… no more problems other than how to deal with convicted mass murders still found to be guilty after multiple appeals and a few people scared by cops every couple years… there is where you will find Emma Camp… standing alone against the forces of severe but accidental inconvenience.
Yes. I demand that cops should never break into houses in the middle of the night. Even if they had the right house there was no excuse for this behavior. This doesn’t seem like a really far fetched ask really.
Is it illegal for anyone with an IQ of over 80 to become a cop? It sure seems like it.
I’ve been reliably informed that cops don’t make mistakes.
sarcasmic 10 hours ago
Flag Comment Mute User
Chat up a defense attorney or someone who works in the office of one, and ask how many of their clients didn’t do it. They’ll likely say none. I was surprised at this myself.
When talking to dispatchers, Mr. S accidentally gave the wrong address for Mrs. H’s house, reporting Harrington’s address instead.
…
According to the complaint, Lancaster clearly should have known that dispatch had been given the wrong address.
Why?
Call 1: Investigate House 1.
Call 2: Investigate House 1, mistakenly reported as House 2.
Arrival: At this point nobody has corrected them about the issue.
You guys remember Home Alone? The burglars were marking/hitting multiple houses on the same street based on knowledge that they weren’t home. Criminals DO that.
If House 2 was reported, and nobody ever corrected them on it, why would you expect the cops to “clearly know” that dispatch had been given the wrong address? They HAVE to investigate it
Imagine that something HAD happened at House 2 and was reported. What, the cop is supposed to arrive and say, “Hey I was near here earlier at a different house. Someone must have gotten something wrong. Let’s go investigate the first house – and ONLY the first house.”
That’s stupid.
And yea, a second call to the same neighborhood plus an unlocked door? Kinda suspicious. Even if wrong, it doesn’t mean the suspicion was invalid.
Look, I get that y’all are a bunch of mindless reflex ACABs – but maybe put just the slightest amount of rational thought into these articles?
Oh, wait, it’s Emma. Never mind. See, if she had a brain, she would have capitalized on this part:
They walked down hallway with their guns drawn. They found Mr. Harrington and his wife asleep in their bed. Defendant Lindsay asked Defendant Cano, “Did they give us the right address?” to which he replied in a whisper, “I don’t know.” The two Defendants retreated to the front door. Instead of staying outside to radio dispatch or take other steps to confirm the address, they knocked for the first time, announced their presence, and then reentered the home with their guns still drawn.
I mean, if that’s true (and no, allegation in a complaint does not make it so), then dang. They’ve cleared the house AND questioned the accuracy. Yea, at that point they should be calling it in.
BUT, that’s also very specific. Is there bodycam to that effect? Where did this allegation come from?
Also, why’s Mrs. Harrington not a named plaintiff? Maybe she has a different take on things here?
Things that a journalist should look at before, y’know, just splattering mindless narrative all over the screen.
Your ability to ignore whatever is inconvenient to your narrative is incredible. Did you miss the part where the one officer knew it should be the other house (saying they were ‘waiting on the owner’, and knowing it was the other house that had the person knocking on the back door)?
And shouldn’t they knock and announce and wait for the resident to respond before invading the home? Where’s the probable cause to enter *that* house?
I expect you to again ignore all information to the contrary and draw all inferences in favor of the police. Never change AT.
No, I didn’t miss that part. It doesn’t change the fact that the police received reports of suspicious activity at two locations, both of which now merited investigation since there was no point where the 911 caller informed them of his mistake. They HAVE to investigate both now.
The fact that one had been previously investigated by one of the same officers is irrelevant. They can’t just assume a mistake has been made and ignore the second call completely.
And shouldn’t they knock and announce and wait for the resident to respond before invading the home? Where’s the probable cause to enter *that* house?
They’ve had two separate reports of potential prowlers, and they came across an open house. I’m not 100% sure about Texas, but in many jurisdictions an unlocked house (both front and back, I might add!) carries with it no reasonable expectation of privacy. No probable cause needed. And even if it was, coupled with reports of suspicious activity could arguably create an exigent circumstance that might also negate the need for it.
It’s not inferences in favor of the police, it’s just a simple understanding of the law. Like I said – where I start to draw issue with the police conduct is in the second breach.
But stupid Emma, like you here, was too busy on her ACAB tear to notice that fact. You want to assume your conclusion right out of the gate and not think real hard about whether it’s accurate just so long as it affirms your narrative – and in doing so, you assert an argument that makes no sense, while completely missing one that actually might.
That’s why I start with the facts as given, and see if they GET to the conclusion being asserted. Which is the way you’re supposed to do things when engaging in rational thinking.
“If House 2 was reported, and nobody ever corrected them on it, why would you expect the cops to “clearly know” that dispatch had been given the wrong address? They HAVE to investigate it”
Good point. I’d like to know why an officer burst into a house screaming in Spanish. Since I don’t speak the language my first conclusion was that it was a MS13, illegals or other gang invasion and begin firing especially if it was in the middle of the night.
The cops were dumb, but:
1. why did the first lady call the cops simply because there was a knock at the door?
2. why did her nosy neighbor call the cops just because he saw a truck in the driveway?
What’s going on in that neighborhood?