Alabama Police Officer on Leave After Viral Video Shows Her Tasing Handcuffed, Compliant Man
The Alabama State Bureau of Investigation is now looking into the incident as well.

A police officer in the inaptly named town of Reform, Alabama, has been placed on administrative leave after a viral video showed her tasing a handcuffed and compliant man during a traffic stop. The incident is now also under investigation by the state.
The cell phone video of the December 2 traffic stop starts with the officer ordering the handcuffed man to get off the ground and leading him to the back of her patrol car. The video doesn't capture what happened before.
The officer puts the man against the trunk of the patrol car, places her taser against his back, and orders him to "stay still."
"I ain't doing shit. I got a gun right there," he says, referring to a gun in his pants. "I'm not doing nothing."
The officer removes the gun from the man's pants, then laughs and says, "Oh yeah!"
"What you saying 'Oh, yeah' for?" the man asks. "I'm not–"
The officer tases the man in the back until he begins crying and yells at him to "shut the fuck up."
Local news outlet WVTM of Birmingham identified the man as Micah Washington, 24, of Tuscaloosa:
"She Tased him in the back and she was holding it. She was just holding it there until he started crying," said Jalexis Rice, Washington's girlfriend.
Rice said this all started when her boyfriend and two others were changing a tire of the car they were driving.
She claims that's when the officer in the video pulled up, eventually putting her boyfriend in handcuffs and stunning him with a stun gun.
According to Pickens County Jail records, Washington has been charged with resisting arrest, obstructing governmental operations, possession of marijuana, drug trafficking, and being an ex-felon in possession of a firearm. He was released yesterday on a $505,000 bond.
The Reform police chief and the city have not released more details on the traffic stop, or what happened prior to the beginning of the video. In statements to news media, Reform Police Chief Richard Black only acknowledged that he had seen the video and that all evidence regarding the traffic stop was being sent to the Alabama State Bureau of Investigation for review.
In any case, the video clearly shows that Washington was disarmed, handcuffed, and not resisting when the officer tased him at length—a particularly sadistic example of excessive force that will be hard to justify even with the generous leeway afforded to police by departments and courts.
Unfortunately, such constitutional abuses are not isolated. Reason recently reported on a Wyoming police officer who is being sued for assaulting a disabled eight-year-old boy; a Mississippi county where a gang of sheriff's deputies proudly called themselves "the goon squad;" and how Maryland cops shot a woman's dog and then said, "That's what happens when you don't answer questions."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Mulletbama
The cop is a woman, so I'm not so sure that's a mullet.
What is a woman?
What is a woman?
A man without a penis. /s
I think Handcuffed Complaint Man may be on the same team as Bicycle Repair Man.
For reference:
https://youtu.be/Tq_xTeWiv6I?si=ozF2U1mjUpII71eX
If good cops existed they would speak out against incidents like this.
It’s what they don’t say that matters.
You don’t think they have, as law enforcement, a responsibility and duty to enforce the law within their own ranks?
I think that’s quite a bit different than you and your moron friends making up shit when I don’t say anything about something and calling me a liar when I disagree.
But you know this. You can’t be that stupid.
Sober up?
For many weeks now, thanks for asking. Ass.
Is part of their job getting medals for shooting an unarmed woman? Asking for consistency.
Only if they're federally employed, you know that.
Sorry. Forgot.
A new pastime is guessing which muted rectangular MAGAt Sarc is sparring with.
That's how pathetic I expected your hobbies to be.
But they don't or we'd have heard from them already.
Are these the people who are supposed to use their discretion to determine who can carry a concealed weapon?
I'm just gonna say it-this is a problem with female officers. This guy is clearly more than a foot taller than her. He's not even particularly buff or jacked and he's probably got 100 pounds of muscle on her.
Anecdotally, female officers are more likely to escalate situations because even the slightest bit of tension from someone with such a physical advantage is threatening to them. She can't even risk standing next to him without him being handcuffed on the off chance he might decide he doesn't need to listen to her shit.
This is what happened with the deaf guy who recently got his ass beat by two officers; he didn't realize he was being pulled over until he parked at his destination and got out of the car. A female officer panicked because she thought he was coming to attack her when he was clearly baffled by what was going on, and slammed him into the pavement to handcuff him, so he couldn't even try to sign at the officers.
The phenomenon you describe may happen sometimes but it has no relevance here. The man was already in handcuffs and compliant. There was no situation to escalate and no possible remaining risk of a threat when she attacked him. This was pure sadistic bullying.
You're just reinforcing my point. He's not escalating, she is. She has to force compliance through exerting control.
How in the hell is she ever going to handcuff this guy if he's NOT compliant? He could just stand there with his arms up and she'd never reach them. This dude might be able to bench her with one arm.
...But he was already handcuffed.
He was handcuffed and bent over the car. Looks pretty compliant to me
There is a recent video going around where four female officers (from NYC?) could not detain a male suspect. All four were tubby and barely tried to waddle after him once he got loose.
I saw that and was frankly surprised they didn't just kill the guy on the spot for failure to obey. It's not like anything else would have happened.
Female law enforcement officers of color in a blue city. You’re probably right.
All four were tubby and barely tried to waddle after him once he got loose.
Expecting cops to be in shape is fat-phobic. Or something.
They could have starred in Miami Vice.
Crockett and Tubbs
Sure it's not Virgin Tubbs?
"They call me Mx. Tubbs!"
https://twitter.com/CPD1617Scanner/status/1727678611933515858
Thanks. Chicago.
Don't worry, Kim Foxx will have him back on the street in no time.
Someone needs to toss the Brazzers logo on that!
It was Chicago.
Meh, seems like I recall a clip of something similar to this happening in NYC too.
Edit: Where I'm from, the "You don't do that to a woman." from a woman, shouted at a guy with 5 other guys sitting on top of him would've elicited a "Shut the fuck up."
ATM I agree with you. This is intersectionality -- the intersection of wokeness (having a woman do a man's job) and Cartmann-ness (respect my author-i-TIE).
The thread discussing ass-to-mouth is the one below. Not this one.
This is such an interesting comment. Decades ago the “stereotype” that was constantly levied at women police officers was that because of their empathetic and caring nature they would be less likely to use force when it was needed and appropriate. Hence, we shouldn’t let them be police officers. Now, it seems like the “stereotype” is that because women are small, physically weaker, etc. they are actually more likely to use force. Hence, we shouldn’t let them be police officers.
For what it’s worth, the vast majority of the research I’ve read looking at this finds no significant differences between men and women and their use of force. To me that isn’t that surprising when you look at the distribution of use of force within a department across officers.
While I do know a couple studies that do find statistically significant gender differences, all of those point to men being more likely to use higher levels of force compared to female officers. However, not sure about moderator/interaction effects (e.g., are women more likely to use force when interacting with men compared to when interacting with women).
Hmm...
I still don't want to be pulled over by a female cop.
This is such an interesting comment. Decades ago the “stereotype” that was constantly levied at women police officers was that because of their empathetic and caring nature they would be less likely to use force when it was needed and appropriate. Hence, we shouldn’t let them be police officers. Now, it seems like the “stereotype” is that because women are small, physically weaker, etc. they are actually more likely to use force. Hence, we shouldn’t let them be police officers.
If you want to find evidence of a person holding both of those positions, you'd be able to levy an accusation of hypocrisy. Frankly, I think the idea that women are inherently "caring and empathetic" is problematic; individuals have personalities, collective groups do not.
But when you're looking at physical standards, you don't need subjective criteria. This is a short woman, probably 120 pounds at max, likely less. Should she be barred from any law enforcement career? No, there's ton of police duties that are less physically taxing. But as a lone patrol officer she might be out of her depth.
Another reason why women do not belong on police force, except to handle females arrested and brought in for incarceration. Other than that, they do not belong on patrol.
Am I the only one who read that as "tasting" instead of "tasing?"
Just me? Ok then.
The video you seek is out there somewhere, I’m sure.
She is part of the penal system.
Don't you mean renal?
Urine the right in that she made a few folks pissed.
I got the pun chumby. Sorry sarc didn't.
Possible that it was Tulpa posting.
She seems nice.
Tasers are supposed to be a replacement for deadly force and only deployed when deadly force would be justified. Instead they've become torture devices. I suppose it's better than beating someone with a club. That is unless the tased person falls onto their head and dies.
Many places use them as compliance devices.
That doesn't change the fact that their use was sold to the general public as a substitute for deadly force that would never be used for compliance and torture.
Tasers can definitely be lethal. Looking at individual cases reported by the Guardian in 2016 (https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2015/jun/01/the-counted-police-killings-us-database), it seems that Tasers account for roughly 2% of the deaths caused by cops.
It was a flawed concept to begin with. The inventor imagined that people faced with a threat which warranted lethal force would take a chance on less-than-lethal force. When it became obvious that they weren’t, he had the choice of continuing to sell electric whips or going out of business.
You hit the nail on the head with Less Than Lethal. There are no Star Trek phasers with a stun setting that there 100% safe stopping power. Anything that can disable a person can also kill them. The one thing that less than lethal weapons can do that lethal weapons can't do is fail miserably. For every technique there are people it will kill and people who won't notice the effect or while angry won't care about the effect.
A .45 slug to the chest is about as close to 100% effective as you can get.
But that makes no sense.
We already know that there are any number of sitautions where the lethal force of a handgun may be replaced with the various "less-lethal" weapons, which is why "less-lethal" options even exist. Unless you also object to billy clubs and pepper spray.
Or has a heart attack.
I’m just going to say it. It should be spelled with a “z”. Lazer. Tazer. Acronym etymologies, be damned. Second thing I want done after we get rid of the commies.
There are a whole lot of words in English where "s" is pronounced like "z".
Surprise!
edit: Laser is an acronym: light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation
Would it be better if it was spelled LASER everytime it was used?
Taser is also an acronym.
Ok, sure, but "Tom Swift and His Electric Rifle" is a lame attempt at a nickname instead of an actual description of the device's functionality.
You could always, if you like, just pronounce it differently. It's an acronym, so the spelling comes from the thing it's based on. It shouldn't be spelled differently just because you think people are pronouncing it wrong, you should just pronounce it the way it's spelled.
Well in the 24th century it's spelled phaser, also an acronym. So now you're gonna argue with Star Trek canon?
Cops are like that, yup, they are!
I'm guessing he started out as a "compliant man", but then after that treatment wound up as the headline read, a "complaint man"!
Judging by her expression she got a kick out of that. Dollars to doughnuts she bragged about it when she got back to the station.
After watching a few times, I think she's so twisted she mistook her taser for her glock and was trying to 'empty' it into his liver.....
Odd name for a superhero:
What's his super powers, I wonder?
Hopefully suing sadistic cops into bankruptcy.
Bwaaahahahahahahahaaaaaa
It wouldn't be the cop filing bankruptcy. Assuming no qualified immunity, the local govt that hired this officer would be on the hook for the payment. Which is fine for the victim, they usually have deeper pockets than individual cops BUT its the taxpayers that ultimately foot the bill in the end.
Which needs to end immediately if ever we want accountability to fall on the individual officers in the hope that maybe then they wouldn't be suck colossal d-bags. Police unions have lots of pull and lots of politicians want to 'back the blue' and 'be tough on crime.' So its a hard sell.
Local government, you mean the taxpayers who are always on the hook for these lawsuits.
Handcuffed Complaint Man's superpower is generally dying in futile, impotently raging irrelevance.
I also think that one of his special moves is can’t-breathing.
Gotta be an old Jewish guy.
Alternate name: The Kvetch
Something less than Particle Man?
Supporting the current thing, reluctantly.
The uncanny ability to turn a criminal traffic stop into a multi-million dollar payout using only the sound of his voice.
Just watched the video. That whiny little bitch is crying extra hard to get that payout.
Largely irrelevant. If the cop had behaved professionally, and NOT used a potentially lethal weapon on a handcuffed suspect who was not actively resisting, she wouldn't be on leave, and he'd be looking at some serious prison time for a Felon In Possession Of A Firearm.
Because the twit couldn't act like a professional, I wouldn't be surprised if they drop the charges in return for the lawsuit going away, and he'll be free to continue to be a menace to his community.
What is a complaint man?
Obviously, when everyone is a senior editor no one is an editor.
Proofreading saves phrases.
I see someone corrected the headline. Was it one of senior editors? Or just one of the plain type editors?
It was a ninja editor.
The video doesn’t capture what happened before. … Washington has been charged with resisting arrest, obstructing governmental operations, possession of marijuana, drug trafficking, and being an ex-felon in possession of a firearm. He was released yesterday on a $505,000 bond.
Methinks this “The victim suddenly appeared in front of the officer, face down, in handcuffs.” could use some fleshing out.
I mean, I know it's a cardinal sin of democracy to ask members of either the privileged law enforcement class or the privileged journalism class to do their jobs with the least bit of integrity but...
Nothing in that list of charges seems to speak to why she stopped him or confronted him in the first place, which is odd.
I've seen some speculation that she ran his plates and it came back registered to him & flagged with a warrant. Which explain the encounter, but would still not explain the 'tase your cuffed suspect in the back until he squeals' technique that she employed.
Speculation?
Let's say it came back he was wanted for murder. Does that justify electrocuting a handcuffed man?
I always thought it was the bad guys who torture prisoners.
"Does that justify electrocuting a handcuffed man?"
No. I'm not sure what would, short of the handcuffed man overpowering the officer and attempting to either flee or do great bodily harm to the officer or others.
Is that what your copy of the NAP says? The aggressor, a previous and suspected felon, must overpower the victim before the victim is allowed to retaliate?
You tards may not like officer wet rag wearing a badge but spineless morons are the reason she’s on the force and to say “Now she’s on the force she can’t even fire her taser unless she’s been overpowered first.” is pretty fucking evil.
I mean is it too difficult to act like actual no-shit libertarians around here? Humans use force against each other outside the law all the time. Frequently resulting in death. We just got a police case where an alcoholic wound up mummified. The article even points to a story about an SRO body slamming a grade school kid. Comparatively speaking, this is an exceedingly fucking tame case of abuse.
The aggressor, a previous and suspected felon, must overpower the victim before the victim is allowed to retaliate?
The video doesn't appear to show him being an aggressor, so what retaliation is appropriate?
There's a Grand Canyon between "she can't use her taser unless overpowered" and "she can taze a cuffed and compliant suspect willy-nilly".
The video doesn’t appear to show him being an aggressor, so what retaliation is appropriate?
I know this is hard for you retards to figure out but "I reserve judgement until I see all the facts." or even "I'm not the King of Alabama, nobody died or was permanently injured, not my problem." is a valid answer.
There’s a Grand Canyon between “she can’t use her taser unless overpowered” and “she can taze a cuffed and compliant suspect willy-nilly”
Yeah, no shit, I'm not the one who leapt to the "she can't use her taser unless overpowered side of the Grand Canyon" on less than half the evidence.
Except that we're in the real world here, where we have video of the guy not being aggressive. So, yes, the evidence seems to indicate that the tasing was uncalled for.
Now, answer my question: The video doesn’t appear to show him being an aggressor, so what retaliation is appropriate?
The video doesn’t appear to show him being an aggressor, so what retaliation is appropriate?
Obtaining a complete video of the complete incident.
As I indicate below, you don’t have the mentality to understand the retardedness of your own position, even if it detracts from the side you presume yourself to be taking.
To be clear, if she beat him to the ground and then handcuffed him for no reason at all, are you going to stick with the narrative “No aggression occurred prior to her tasing him in the video.” or no?
Because I laid it out pretty equally (non-)criminally and (non-)aggressively on behalf of both parties and, for some reason, you rejected it in favor of the sexual musings inside your own head.
It IS bad guys who torture prisoners, and they're usually bad guys with guns, badges, and no regard for the law.
Nothing in that list of charges seems to speak to why she stopped him or confronted him in the first place, which is odd.
The "We were just changing a tire and yada yada yada my gun-toting ex-con boyfriend was on the ground in cuffs." is retarded as all hell too. It *should* be an embarrassment to a reporter to print that but, this is Reason (drink).
‘tase your cuffed suspect in the back until he squeals’ technique
I just watched the video and you people need to get the fuck out. The way it's told, I was expecting him to get tased for several minutes before finally breaking down. He starts fucking crying for the camera the instant the taser goes off. You people are fucking retarded chumps just waiting to get played by the next Jo Jorgensen and another Summer of Love.
Why was it ok for him to get tased at the point when we see him get tased?
The story is an embarrassment, absolutely, but so is insisting that tasing someone who was apparently not being aggressive is totes ok. Your copy of the NAP appears to be defective.
Your copy of the NAP appears to be defective.
A working NAP with a defective presumption of innocence and due process isn't really any better.
Does every tasing by anyone automatically count as an aggressive act warranting any/all responses under the NAP or are there No harm/No foul or Stupid games/Stupid prizes exceptions? Because, if the USMC in your name means anything, I'm pretty sure you've engaged in the former, if not the latter. And if you want it to continue to mean anything, things are going to have to stay that way.
Really putting work on the "mad" part of your name.
Does every tasing by anyone
Since nobody is talking about that, what does it matter? THIS officer, in THIS video, tased THIS suspect for what appears to be NO GOOD REASON. Address THIS video.
Stupid Games/Stupid Prizes is warranted in this instance? How? Sorry, but the mere act of being a bad person doesn't instantly qualify one for stupid prizes. The suspect was, apparently, being cooperative. That's exactly what should earn one a "no stupid prizes from thugs in uniforms" award.
Cooperate and be punished is a problem, is it not? Or are you ok with that?
Since nobody is talking about that, what does it matter?
Just because you want to ignore evidence that may not support your narrative, the presumption of evidence, and due process and, instead, shout NAP! rather literally out of any/all context, doesn't mean everyone else does.
This really isn't that hard but you keep voluntarily retarding yourself.
The plug your ears and shout "I can't hear you!" defense? Interesting.
The plug your ears and shout “I can’t hear you!” defense? Interesting.
Right. I repeatedly posit that there's other evidence and an entire other side to the story, maybe even several, but you continue to say "BUT TEH VIDEO SHOWEZ!" and, bizarrely, "I CAN'T HEAR YOU OVER MY IMAGINING YUR SECHSUAL FANTASEEZ!" with your fingers in your ears.
Male, Female, Gay, Straight, Trans – ACAB.
According to other news outlets, she initiated contact for him "being suspicious" . He was changing the tire on a car. Changing a tire while black is a suspicious thing to do, apparently.
And is that absolute glee I see on her face when she tased him ? His whole spine must have seized and she just tells him to stop crying. I'd like someone to do that back to her and see how it feels.
Shocking that the first mention of this being a racially based attack is from you.
I'm not an ostrich.
Btw, there is no Santa Claus, there is no Easter Bunny, there is no God, the government man is not here to help you, men are not women, and the over policing of minorities under BS premises is real ... especially in Alabama.
It is POSSIBLE that she recognized him, knew that he was a felon, and spotted what looked a lot like a concealed firearm on him, and confronted him about it.
However, by tasing a handcuffed suspect who was not resisting arrest at the time he was tased, I'm not inclined to extend the benefit of the doubt to this particular cop.
OK, so obviously this is wrong on multiple levels. There's no defense to be made here. Let's take it by the numbers.
1) Female cop. By and large, they can't do the job. Sorry not sorry. (Even worse that she was apparently riding solo.)
2) Gross misuse of force. So, the guy has a gun. That's not an automatic green light to escalate force. Especially when he's restrained and you've taken control of the lethal weapon. Which, btw, she did a terrible job of leading us to...
3) Improper firearm handling. So, she finds a gun on the guy and just casually tosses it on the hood of her car? While there are two other unaccounted for suspects on the scene?
4) "Shut the f*** up." So, this is one of those things that evidence that power has gone to a cop's head. A suspect that won't shut up does not justify using force to subdue him into compliance. A suspect that's resisting, sure - but this guy, despite being a chatterbox, appears to be complying. That's usually a, "If you won't do as I say, I'll make you." Not OK.
5) What instigated the confrontation in the first place? Sorry not sorry but "Rice said this all started when her boyfriend and two others were changing a tire of the car they were driving" smells fishy. I've watched the video a couple times, and I can't make out what's by the back left tire - but, the rear two seem fine, and I'm not seeing a lean to the car that would suggest a problem up front. Also, if you've ever changed a tire, your trunk is almost certainly open while you're doing it. And Washington is only 24 years old with a felony conviction - and he picked up a trafficking charge, meaning they found ample drugs. Was he a known scumbag dealer that girlcop happened upon? Did she spot them doing something shady there on the side of the road? Were they actively searching for him? What was the lead-up to all this? Not that the answer would justify her conduct, but it would certainly give us some insight into her mindset.
I hate how nobody bothers to investigate this stuff before splattering the video online hoping to go viral and gin up outrage. And then how everyone goes head first into it, like it's some kind of socially-acceptable pornography to indulge in.
5) It looks like it was “contempt of cop”, a very serious offense.
https://www.al.com/news/2023/12/handcuffed-man-hit-with-stun-gun-by-alabama-police-after-stopping-to-change-tire-freed-from-jail.htm
The ordeal began when Washington was changing a flat tire on a Pickens County roadway, not far from his aunt’s house, Maxwell said. Washington and others were going back and forth to the house to get equipment needed to change the tire when Elmore stopped to question Johnson.
Maxwell said the officer asked him what was going on and asked him for identification. Washington told the officer he was not doing anything wrong, knew his rights and didn’t have to provide that information if he wasn’t detained.
Washington pulled out his phone to start recording and Elmore used a stun gun on Washington, which caused him to drop to the ground. He was then handcuffed.
What happened next was caught on the now-viral video recorded by one of Washington’s family members.
Yea, see - that's squirrely.
It's a frickin' Hyundai Elantra. I promise you there's no "equipment" that they need to hike back and forth to Auntie's house to get. It's all in the trunk. Which is closed.
There's something about this young felon and how he came to be there that missing and how/why girlcop came upon them. Again, not that it justifies anything Maniac Cop did - but still. It'd be nice to have the whole picture rather than just the outrage porn.
Assuming all the equipment that came with the car ... is still in the car, then yes. There is no mention of if this is the original owner or after the car has been sold for the uptenth time. I have no idea.
I would think the reason for the stop would be in the contact report, but in all the outlets I've read, the police aren't talking about it. Usually if they have a good reason they won't shut up about it because it makes the stop look more legit. And as usual, they've thrown every charge they can think of against the victim to see what will stick. After ... what, 3 days? ... some of the charges are already falling off. It will be interesting to see what remains.
Oh, so he was tased, cuffed, and then tased again while cuffed.
Yeah, officer went too far.
Oh, so he was tased, cuffed, and then tased again while cuffed.
According to the Washington and/or his attorney.
Despite Liberty_Belle's retardation about being an ostrich, the same narrative works both ways: if the media had bodycam footage or were being unduly denied it, that would be part of the story. It's not.
Likely, it's like any one of hundreds of similar incidents where a finger to the chest (from a 120 lb. woman) and a dismissive brush off (from a larger man) is, rightly, by both parties, seen as an acts of aggression.
But narrow minded idiots gotta cling to narrow minded narratives. Even if those narratives feed directly into Antifa narratives and larger indictments of Western society as a whole.
According to the Washington and/or his attorney.
So? If he wasn't tased prior to being cuffed, then it's even more egregious to have tased him later, while he was cuffed and cooperating.
Likely, it’s like any one of hundreds of similar incidents where a finger to the chest (from a 120 lb. woman) and a dismissive brush off (from a larger man) is, rightly, by both parties, seen as an acts of aggression.
What makes that likely? I watched the video, it doesn't seem likely to me. It doesn't seem like the big guy is being aggressive. He could have easily overpowered her prior to being cuffed, or even after being cuffed. But, he doesn't appear to attempt it. So, why does that warrant tasing?
But narrow minded idiots gotta cling to narrow minded narratives
Yes, it appears you do.
Yes, it appears you do.
Aw, mature enough to avoid putting "I'm rubber you're glue." in front of it. How cute.
Well, sometimes it's fun to stoop to your level.
Once again, Alabama proves itself to be a shithole full of corrupt cops who have no regard for the law Why does ANYONE even visit there?
On the other hand, I've been to Albuquerque.
As a Burqueno... you're not wrong.
I was going to say that it always seems like Reason does this on purpose. They'll have a half-dozen or so brutal police abuse cases and then they'll cap it off with a case of some actual felon who was actually breaking the law who gets border line man handled and act like it's rise of the Fourth Reich. Then I thought about the purpose:
A Los Angeles Jail Let a Woman Die of Withdrawal, Then a Coroner Allowed Her Body To Decompose - EMMA CAMP | 11.29.2023 4:00 PM - Show Comments (53)
Wyoming Cop Assaulted a Disabled 8-Year-Old, Then Deleted the Body Camera Footage, Lawsuit Claims - EMMA CAMP | 12.4.2023 5:14 PM - Show Comments (75)
Alabama Police Officer on Leave After Viral Video Shows Her Tasing Handcuffed, Compliant Man - C.J. CIARAMELLA | 12.6.2023 1:13 PM - Show Comments (93) (86, so far, without my contributions)
So a woman dying in prison and getting mummified by neglect and an SRO tackling a gradeschooler gets a benign sigh from the forum but the gun toting ex-con who gets tased and suffers no other injury gets more comments than the other two in less time...
it almost seems like some of you are the self-hating white people that the Reason contributors are clamoring over each other at cocktail parties to inform and entertain.
Different stories get different responses, who knew?
Half of the comments here are jabs at the female cop, and the misspelled "complaint man".
The 8-year-old story got plenty of comments about reporting the lawsuit as fact.
Speak of the Devil!
The first article I cite-
Ctrl+f "VinniUSMC": 0 results.
The second article I cite-
Ctrl+f "VinniUSMC": 0 results.
This article-
Ctrl+f "VinniUSMC": 8 results.
Yeah, I didn't read the first one, and the second one had a great comment that said everything I would have said. So what?
What do you think that proves?
Why can't you admit that people shouldn't be tased without justification?
Why can’t you admit that people shouldn’t be tased without justification?
I never said they shouldn't. People shouldn't be tased without justification. Better? Now, I know this whole libertarian, adult thing is difficult but, in turn, what do we do about it? Tase her back? Fire her for being a 5' tall, 120 lb. female who felt threatened and/or powerless? Release an illegally-armed felon because a 5' tall, 120 lb. female felt threatened/powerless?
I'm not your enemy, General, and this isn't any sort of real existential crisis, yet. But I am strongly suggesting you learn how to think outside of your own head for a bit. The latter option as kneejerk reaction to Tiktok videos has conclusively proven itself to be a widespread and self-defeating failure to your own side's detriment.
None of the above. We should admonish the officer, acknowledge that this isn't how things should go, use it as a teaching moment, and try to do better in the future.
Fire her for being a 5′ tall, 120 lb. female who felt threatened and/or powerless?
Burn that strawman, burn!
Burn that strawman, burn!
I lined up several straw men and I didn't burn any of them rather specifically because that's the point.
See, we've explored all these differing timelines and options, your solution of "admonish the officer, acknowledge that this isn’t how things should go, use it as a teaching moment, and try to do better in the future" is synonymous with the "PAID LEAVE, MOAR TRAINING" straw men that others have lit on fire in futures past and that we'll continue to set fire to and loop through unless we can all figure out how to change all the larger fact patterns.
To wit, admonishing the officer is only half the equation for this particular situation. Is gun-toting felons/criminals/convicts, including Hunter Biden and Gaige Grosskreuz, the libertarian ideal? I'm dubious either way.
On the other hand, look at the diversity!
Almost 50 yr. old hot take.
Personally, I can sympathize with-
Burly Detective : What do ya think, a gang hit, screwed-up drug score, unlucky John, or an unhappy love affair? PI run amok? FBI or DEA frame up? Huh? Don't tell me this shit's gettin' to ya. Not Harry Callahan. Say it ain't so.
Harry Callahan : No, this stuff isn't gettin' to me. The knifings, the beatings, old ladies being bashed in the head for their Social Security checks, teachers being thrown out of a fourth-floor window because they don't give As, the prison rape, the false rape accusations, the cries of systemic racism, the false racial hate crime accusations, the domestic abuse, the nickel rides, the suspects throwing themselves against vehicle walls to hurt themselves, the trigger happy no-knock raids at the wrong house, the intentional SWATtings at the right house, the flashbanged babies, the Beer Summit, the anonymous reports, the edited videos posted online showing a group of black kids getting assaulted by a pregnant woman for a bike, the unedited live stream of a group of kids beating up a retarded kid because
he's whitethey think he voted for Trump, the unarmed man shot on his knees in the hallway, the officers shot at a BLM rally in Dallas, the officers standing around outside Uvalde, the officers that enforced lockdowns, the officers that refuse to enforce lockdowns, plainly and knowingly unconstitutional governors trying to grab guns, local LEOs refusing to obey them... that doesn't bother me a bit.Burly Detective : Come on, Harry. Take it easy.
Harry Callahan : Or this job, either. Having to wade through the scum of this city, being swept away by bigger and bigger waves of corruption, apathy and red tape. Wade through the #Russiagate press, the #MeToo press, the #ACAB press, the #COVID19 press, the "mostly peaceful" press, the "Antifa is just an idea" press, the "a fire extinguisher killed Sicknick" stories, the "OMG! Can you believe he said good people on both sides" press, the "right-wing extremism kills and gun violence kills more people than car accidents" press, the "tacitly religious Western Democracy is worse than Marxism and ancient sacrificial tribal Theocracies combined" press... Nah, that doesn't bother me. But you know what does bother me?
Burly Detective : What?
Harry Callahan : You know what makes me really sick to my stomach?
Burly Detective : What?
Harry Callahan : Is watching
you stuff your face with those hot dogs.a 120 lbs. woman tase an able bodied adult male in handcuffs for less than 30s without any other injury. Nobody, I mean NOBODYputs ketchup on a hot dogdiscomforts a black felon illegally carrying a weapon for any reason.Why are you so triggered by this? Are you a female cop who likes to tase black people?
This article didn’t trigger me to show up and comment, I’d be commenting if it were about Sicknick or The Jones Act or COVID or Section 230 or EV susbidies or pretty much any of the shitty reporting that Reason does… how about you?
Sorry, I’m not sexually gratified by maintaining lists and bookmarks and searches for “gotchas” like you are. Make your point.
The first comment you made on this article was great (unless this wasn't you? https://reason.com/2023/12/06/alabama-police-officer-on-leave-after-viral-video-shows-her-tasing-handcuffed-complaint-man/?comments=true#comment-10345422). Calling out the shitty reporting of Reason, spot on. Same as the shitty reporting of the 8-year-old story which breathlessly repeated the lawsuit as fact.
Your strange retorts later that a person shouldn’t be safe from police aggression while they are cooperating? Statist bootlicker bullshit.
Sorry you got so triggered.
I don’t need to restate my point. Your showing up and advertising the sexual fantasies in your own head that nobody was talking about until you got here makes my point better than I ever could.
As I linked above, you aren’t mentally equipped to deal with this issue. You’re stuck in a “People feel threatened when *I* think they should feel threatened and we need to release more actually criminal felons, as evidence, I present a Tiktok video (just like Antifa would).”/"It's *MY VERSION* of the NAP-way or the the Highway" mentality. Except, unlike the clip I linked above, I don’t believe the laws of physics or any existential crisis is so impending that you can’t, someday, develop an understanding of it.
Whomp whomp
Your showing up and advertising the sexual fantasies in your own head that nobody was talking about until you got here makes my point better than I ever could.
So, should I point out the "I know you are but what am I?" See, it's fun to crawl around in the mud sometimes.
So, should I point out the “I know you are but what am I?” See, it’s fun to crawl around in the mud sometimes.
I'm trying to get you to consider not just this incident but women in policing, feminism, the NAP, MOAR TRAINING, and Antifa as they all converge on this incident and this forum and magazine has covered and faulted all of them.
You're trying to pretend I'm here to watch dominatrix BDSM porn.
I don't agree with the "and you never will be" portion of the clip I linked above, but you're doing your darnedest to make it true.
Alabama cop, brown prisoner, Austrian torture. The cop is surely angling for a leadershop position in the Lootveeg Fon Meeces Caucus
Due to the circumstances surround this man, I believe extra caution would be warranted but Tasing someone who's already cuffed and up against the hood of the car is over the top.
However since the cop is a woman who is half his size in weight and muscle she is obviously taking no chances.
On the other hand if women who joined the police force were allowed only desk jobs to handle female arrestees and not out on patrol, might make some difference.
Women have no business on street patrol. But thanks to feminism and liberal ideology women have been put into evermore dangerous situations such a police patrol and even combat.
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=micah+washington+vs+elane#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:8793c375,vid:XYHaugdaUyM,st:0
Micah Washington speaks out in interview after recorded incident.