Ohio Becomes the 24th State To Legalize Recreational Marijuana
Voters approved a ballot initiative that will allow possession, home cultivation, and commercial distribution—assuming that state legislators don't interfere.

Ohio, where legislators authorized medical use of marijuana in 2016, went further on Tuesday, becoming the 24th state to legalize recreational use. According to projections by NBC News and The Hill, voters approved Issue 2, which allows adults 21 or older to publicly possess up to 2.5 ounces of marijuana and grow up to six plants at home. With 57 percent of ballots counted, 56 percent of voters had said yes to the ballot initiative, which also will create a system to license and regulate commercial sales.
That's assuming Ohio legislators do not rewrite or override the rules established by Issue 2, which they have the power to do with any "initiated state statute," as opposed to a constitutional amendment. Before Issue 2 was submitted to voters, the Republican-controlled Ohio General Assembly passed up a chance to enact it, and now the measure returns to the legislature, which can revise it before it takes effect.
"I definitely think that if it passes, there are problems in it that need to get addressed," Ohio Senate President Matt Huffman (R–Lima) said before the election. "I will advocate for reviewing things or repealing things or changing things that are in it."
Which things? Huffman was not specific. But in a speech last month, he warned that marijuana legalization could precipitate a "mental health crisis" in Ohio. "When we see more drug use, when we see more teenage mental illness, more teenage suicide," he said, "people may say, 'We should bring this back a little bit.'"
Unsurprisingly, the Coalition to Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol, the group that ran the Issue 2 campaign, thinks the measure should be implemented as is. "We think that Ohio voters have a right to expect that their elected officials follow election results and respect the will of the people," coalition spokesman Tom Haren said in response to Huffman's comments.
Issue 2 was backed by the Marijuana Policy Project, the American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio, the Green Party of Ohio, and two members of the state's congressional delegation: Sen. Sherrod Brown (D) and Rep. David Joyce (R). Their argument was pretty straightforward: that marijuana should be treated like alcohol, which would replace the black market with a regulated industry, generate tax revenue, and "end unfairly harsh punishments for minor marijuana offenses."
Opponents included a bunch of Republican legislators, several law enforcement groups, and Ohio's Republican governor, Mike DeWine, who worried about "increased use by underage kids"—a fear that has not materialized in other states that have legalized marijuana. Three Republican legislators employed starkly anti-capitalist rhetoric, complaining that Issue 2 "puts profits over people" by legalizing "an addiction-for-profit industry" that will "make a few greedy investors rich."
Unless state legislators intervene, Issue 2 will establish a Division of Cannabis Control within the Commerce Department, which will be charged with licensing and regulating growers, manufacturers, testing laboratories, distributors, and retailers. Sales will be taxed at 10 percent, in addition to standard state and local sales taxes that average 7.24 percent. Local governments are not authorized to impose additional marijuana taxes, although they can claim a share of the revenue if they allow pot shops to operate within their borders.
The taxes in neighboring Michigan, where voters approved marijuana legalization in 2018, are similar: a 10 percent retail tax, plus a 6 percent standard sales tax. "We're taking money away from drug dealers and Michigan dispensary owners and putting it back into the pockets of our local governments," Haren said before the election.
Legalization of possession takes effect in Ohio on December 7. State regulators are supposed to start issuing commercial licenses within nine months.
"This isn't groundbreaking," Haren said after Issue 2 qualified for the ballot. "We're just trying to get Ohio in line with neighbors like Michigan and Illinois."
Once people can legally buy marijuana, where can they legally consume it? That question has presented a puzzle in other states that have legalized recreational use without allowing businesses analogous to bars or restaurants that serve alcohol. The problem is especially acute for out-of-state visitors, who are apt to find that their hotels frown upon marijuana use.
The Ohio initiative obliquely addresses that issue. It says marijuana use in "public areas" is a "minor misdemeanor," punishable by a $150 fine. It explicitly does not permit marijuana use on "federal, state, or locally owned land." It says landlords may not reject tenants based primarily on their cannabis consumption, although they would be allowed to prohibit pot smoking as long as that is a condition of the lease. Finally, the initiative says it does not "prohibit any public place from accommodating an individual's use of [recreational] cannabis," which seems to leave room for businesses where people can legally use marijuana.
"Cannabis legalization is an issue that unites Democrats, Republicans, and Independents," Paul Armentano, deputy director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, said in a press release tonight. "Ohioans have seen similar legalization laws adopted in neighboring states and they know that regulating the cannabis market is preferable to the failed policy of prohibition. It is imperative that elected officials respect the voters' decision and implement this measure in a manner that is consistent with the sentiments of the majority of the electorate."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
THE O-high-o State
That ain't a buckeye on your shirt, is it?
If only there were 420 states.
Issue 1 also passed. Abortion is now protected in Ohio by the Ohio State Constitution.
BTW why do all the commenters here pretend that Republicans are more libertarian than Democrats. When the Republican governor of Ohio and most of the Republicans in the state house voted against legalizing marijuana. Now just watch the Republicans in power try to stymie legalization implementation.
Ohio is a swing state.
I guess the voters agreed with Evangeline Lilly.
https://www.instagram.com/p/CZPQ4hlLFCl/
The military has long required all kinds of vaccines, some of which aren't even generally available in the US. It is essential as a defense against biological warfare. Any soldier seaman or airman who refuses should be discharged.
Similar situation with Healthcare professionals. Refusing to get vaccinated endangers their patients and subjects their employers to huge liability. They need to find another line of work.
If you are so stupid as to refuse vaccines, you are no longer a loved one of mine. And if you are my employee I am firing you because you have too low an IQ.
These examples are based on our custom, tradition, and precedent.
Here is the thing.
Requiring bars and restaurants to exclude patrons who did not have proof of vaccination status has absolutely no basis in our custom, tradition, or precedent.
I read about proposals to require airlines to refuse service to passengers to domestic flights who could not prove they were vaccinated. That too, had absolutely no basis in our custom, tradition, and precedent.
And, of course, requiring all employers with over fifty employees to refuse employment to those unvaccinated has absolutely no basis in our custom, tradition, and precedent.
That is the stupidest thing I have read in a long time, Charliehall.
I am a physician and I hope you are aware that the Corona vaccine does not prevent catching OR transmission of Covid.
At best it reduces death rates once infected.
At a cost of increases rates of myocarditis.
So persons at low risk of death from Corona should not get the vaccine.
That is the stupidest thing I have read in a long time, Charliehall.
You new here? He's been spouting inane comments for a while. Ignore him.
Not all vaccines are equal. The fact that it may be reasonable to force some vaccinations on military does not make it reasonable to force any vaccine on them. Vaccines that are time tested and actually prevent infection in most people are amazing things. It is not reasonable at all to assume that any new vaccine will also be in that category. Lots of vaccines have failed or caused more harm than good. The covid vaccines have largely failed, and there is some evidence that they don't come out well in a reasonable cost/benefit for most people.
Nice to see someone who is consistent.
Two huge defeats for the Big Government Party -- the Republicans.
You misspelled "a"
You know who else was against legalizing marijuana, but wasn't a Republican?
https://twitter.com/Steve_Sailer/status/1721955553294049708?t=M6fwlg5kOvd5nnRYvsAEHw&s=19
How much of younger Americans becoming more illiberal is due to their ideology changing away from traditional American support for free speech vs. how much is it due to younger Americans being less white and thus not coming from cultures that valued free speech as much?
Mostly it's coming from social media, where it's easy to gang up on anyone who says anything against the CRT-Marxist-woke orthodoxy.
Maine Question 3
Do you want to create a new power company governed by an elected board to acquire and operate existing for-profit electricity transmission and distribution facilities in Maine?
NO: 67.59% (93,075 votes)
YES: 32.41% (44,628 votes)
30.62% of precincts reported
Local media has called it for the Nays. No socialist electric company.
This thing went down quicker than a slice of stuffed crust pepperoni pizza in Jeff’s gullet.
https://twitter.com/jimstinson/status/1722065409833148737?t=rPj2ezncea8DFdgqgoLoBA&s=19
In a stunning .... punch ... to Richmond area's reputation, the amateur Virginia porn star is about to win.
Gibson Democrat 50.4%
Owen Republican 49.6%
65%
She isn't a porn star, she's a nurse. Sex videos were just a hobby for her. And what exactly is wrong with that?
More like a side hustle.
Looks like she did lose in the end.
I think I'm going to need to investigate further.
Well, to be fair, you wouldn't expect her to be favored in a tight race.
Christopher Charles Morton would be proud.
Good for Ohio.
And people said Libertarians were tilting at windmills trying to legalize drugs. But it's pretty much the only part of the LP platform that's winning.
You mean "#winning".
But also losing. Cannabis is legalized (but heavily taxed) as politicians talk about cracking down on fentanyl, sending the military to Mexico and banning menthol cigarettes. One step forward, 2 steps back.
And here in Wisconsin we don't yet even have medical marijuana laws. Not that it matters as Wisconsin residents can get their pot in neighboring states of Illinois and Minnesota and spend their money in those states.
"Issue 2 will establish a Division of Cannabis Control within the Commerce Department, which will be charged with licensing and regulating growers, manufacturers, testing laboratories, distributors, and retailers."
Brand new bunch of regulators getting millions of tax dollars for running our lives is not my definition of a libertarian win.
I'd say it's a win on points but not a clean KO. It's better than the status quo ante - assuming that the legislature doesn't find ways to unwind the result.
Just once, how about just legalize it and see how that goes?
They sort of did that in DC, I guess (not intentionally, but it worked out that way for a while at least).
It's refreshing to see Ohio embrace progressive policies on recreational marijuana use. It's a positive move towards sensible drug laws, potentially reducing crime and increasing tax revenue. It's a stark contrast to the situation in France, where such liberalization seems far from reality at the moment
love it. someone needs to tee up Texas.
In Ohio, a number of elected politicians were publicly encouraging people to vote against this ballot initiative when it became evident that the initiative would likely pass. When elected officials publicly advocate against the will of the voters, do you really think they’ll go ahead and implement the new law without underhanded attempts to undermine its intent and purpose?
Wait and see. There are a whole lot of people who would be very unhappy if that happened. They might decide to use the new abortion right on some of them thar politicians.
Begone from this earth, tumor