Illinois Family Files Lawsuit After Police Execute Wrong-Door Raid and Allegedly Detain Them for 6 Hours
"I asked them to show me a warrant; they didn't show me nothing," a grandmother said.

A family in Joliet, Illinois, says they were terrorized by police, held at gunpoint, and detained for six hours after officers executed a search warrant on the wrong house.
A federal civil rights lawsuit filed Wednesday by the law offices of Al Hofeld Jr. accuses the town of Joliet and nearly two dozen police officers of unlawful search, excessive force, false arrest, and conspiracy, among other rights violations.
On November 2, 2021, 62-year-old Adela Carrasco and her family were awakened by the sound of banging and shouting at their front door. Carrasco, whom her lawsuit says suffers from asthma and uses a cane due to a hip injury, hobbled toward the door to see what the commotion was.
Carrasco discovered 21 armed law enforcement officers from the Joliet Police Department, Will County Sheriff's Office, and U.S. Marshals Service. The officers were investigating a deadly Halloween-night shooting two days prior and had decided to execute an outstanding warrant for 18-year-old Elian Raya, one of Carrasco's grandsons.
"I asked them to show me a warrant; they didn't show me nothing. They just pushed me aside and went in," Carrasco said at a press conference Thursday announcing the lawsuit. "And I'm screaming at them the whole time to put down their guns because they're going to shoot my grandkids."
The lawsuit says the officers barged into the bedrooms of Carrasco's grandchildren, who ranged in age from 12 to their early twenties, and pointed guns at them while shouting obscenities.
There was only one problem: The search warrant for Raya listed his address as 226 South Comstock. Carrasco lived at 228 South Comstock. The building is a duplex with two separate front entrances, both with addresses clearly marked.
The lawsuit alleges that although officers knew or quickly realized that they were not in the right unit, they continued to ransack Carrasco's house, cutting open couch cushions, flipping mattresses, and dumping drawers.
Even after the officers went next door and arrested Raya, they continued to detain Carrasco and her grandchildren for the next six hours while Raya was taken to the police station and interrogated. The lawsuit says officers refused to let anyone go to the bathroom, put on clothes, or retrieve Carrasco's asthma medication.
"This is unacceptable behavior towards young children and an elderly, disabled woman, regardless of the circumstances," Zach Hofeld, an attorney for the family, said at Thursday's press conference. "There is a modicum of decency and reasonableness with which police must treat the elderly and children. The psychological injuries they suffered as the result of officers' misconduct are profound and will remain with them for the rest of their lives."
The lawsuit alleges that Joliet police officers filed misleading and incomplete reports to cover up their search of the wrong unit and that the department has refused to provide Hofeld's firm with body camera footage of the raid for over a year.
Hofeld's firm says nothing came of Raya's arrest. Three unrelated suspects were later arrested in connection with the Halloween shooting.
Carrasco's fear of her grandchildren being shot was not hypothetical. Earlier this year, the city of Richton Park, Illinois, agreed to pay $12 million to settle a lawsuit stemming from a 2019 SWAT raid during which a police officer shot a 12-year-old boy in the kneecap.
Hofeld's firm represented that family as well, plus roughly a dozen other Chicago-area families who say police pointed guns at their children during botched raids.
An investigation by the local news outlet CBS 2 found that Chicago SWAT teams frequently relied on unverified search warrants to ransack houses; hold families, including children, at gunpoint; and, in one case, handcuff an 8-year-old child. In another case, 17 Chicago police officers burst into a family's house with their guns drawn during a 4-year-old's birthday party. The members of one Chicago family say officers raided their house three times in four months looking for someone the residents say they don't know.
In 2018, Chicago settled another civil lawsuit for $2.5 million by a family who claimed Chicago Police Department officers stormed their house and pointed a gun at a 3-year-old girl.
And in 2020, the Chicago Police Department made national headlines after body camera footage showed officers humiliating a naked woman during a wrong-door raid. Chicago police burst into the apartment of Anjanette Young based on a faulty tip and handcuffed her while she was naked, forcing her to stand in full view of male officers as they searched her home. The city eventually settled a lawsuit filed by Young for $2.9 million.
Reason has been reporting for decades on the disastrous consequences of police departments' reliance on volatile SWAT raids, which put both innocent people and officers at risk.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"I asked them to show me a warrant; they didn't show me nothing. They just pushed me aside and went in,"
I'd say they showed her something.
They showed her who's in charge.
Since I suspect there has never been a wrong address raid at a duplex, of a grandmother and the specific number of children/grandchildren of the specific ages involved here, I expect QI.
You can't have a police state without police.
spot on
If seven-figure judgements ($2,900,000) don't deter this sort of behavior, then eight-figure judgements ($12,000,000-$99,000,000) judgements should become common.
If eight figures don't stop it, in a year or two juries should go to nine figures with continued periodic increases as long as this kind of behavior continues. At some point a level of financial pain will be reached that causes this kind of behavior to stop.
I wonder at what point it would incentivize the "searchers" to consider it cheaper just to kill everyone in the home that shouldn't have been searched or to carry a kilo of two of heroin and a few hundred fentanyl tablets "to find" if they realize they're in the wrong house.
Why do people remain in places like Chicago?
Im making over $13k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. This is what I do.
This Website➤---------------➤ https://www.dailypro7.com
Why would the size of the judgement deter them? The officers don't pay for it. The police department doesn't pay for it. The city doesn't pay for it. Guess who does? The taxpayers, the very people being abused.
Rule 308 is the only thing dirty cops understand.
I know the lawsuit lottery is ingrained in our society but maybe the problem can be solved by changing our societies view of police that innumerable television shows have created. In those shows police are portrayed as brave defenders of social order, the thin line between anarchy and civilization, Clark Kent with a badge, so on and so forth.
We need people to see cops for what they are. Just another kind of government employee serving whatever administration that signs their paychecks. People don't hold postal workers up on pedestals. They don't think the people at the DMV are heroes protecting us from chaos. Police are no different than any other person who gets a government check and should be honored no more than the rest of them.
No judgment is going to serve as much of a deterrent when the money comes out of the pockets of taxpayers, not the thugs who actually violate people's rights. Until misbehaving cops are personally on the hook, they have no reason to care. If you really want to deter them, they should face the same criminal charges as a private citizen who engaged in similar behavior. Bust into the wrong house in the middle of the night and start waving guns around? Sounds to me like criminal trespass and assault with a deadly weapon, just for starters. Holding people at gunpoint for one damned second after you know (or should know) you screwed up? Wrongful imprisonment. Just for good measure, cops should be personally on the hook for any property they damage or destroy when wrongfully executing a warrant. Maybe they'd be a little less eager to smash stuff up if they had to pay for it.
The police Chief and Mayor should be fired and the family given a million for their trouble.
Assholes. Why do they toss the house? I have an idea why. Something to do with their being assholes with no accountability. Process as punishment.
Seems to me that when serving a search warrant that allows the search of a house, they could secure the place, remove the people and carefully and non-destructively search. There's no excuse for destroying property or even making a mess. The search would be more effective too if done methodically and carefully.
Why do they toss the house?
Long version: Punishment for failure to show respect. I bet if the family had been quiet and subservient the cops would have just milled around until they figured out what was going on and left. Instead they responded to righteous indignation with unlawful detainment and property destruction in an effort to find an excuse to illegally arrest someone on charges that they knew would eventually be dropped. Process is the punishment and all that.
Shorter version: Because fuck you, that's why.
Judging from the surnames, this does not sound like a Martha's Vineyard or Hyannis Port beachfront neighborhood. Suppose the cops raiding the wrong address were illiterate rednecks whose command of Spanish is limited to "taco, enchilada, cerveza"... then they have an excuse, right? The victims ought to have protested in Oxford legalese or procured a certified interpreter.
Brings to mind the Democrats reaction to the police they manage killing George Floyd, in distracting people from the Democratic Minneapolis Mayor's responsibility for his police killing Floyd, and blaming it on "systemic racism" (an admission the Democratic mayor and the Democratic chief of police are racists even if they're black) and calling to Defund the Police. All distractions from their responsibility for police abuse, just like this abuse in Democratic run Chicago where "systemic racism" means the black mayor is a racist and can't help but hiring abusive racist police.
IMHO, anyone who claims that systemic racism exists in the USA, should be fired for their racism. I disagree that I'm a racist, and they have nothing but their own police abuse to back it up. It's absurd.
The cops did not kill George Floyd. Floyd died from an over dose of fentanyl, approximately three times the fatal amount .
The true autopsy report indicated the amount of fentanyl in Floyd's system would have killed three people.
Using a technique learned from Isreali police probably didn't help much.
And in 2020, the Chicago Police Department made national headlines after body camera footage showed officers humiliating a naked woman during a wrong-door raid. Chicago police burst into the apartment of Anjanette Young based on a faulty tip and handcuffed her while she was naked, forcing her to stand in full view of male officers as they searched her home. The city eventually settled a lawsuit filed by Young for $2.9 million.
Sounds just like any other regular old business transaction to me.
One should remember that one of the officers, Officer French, was killed in the line of duty. According to Ms. Young, she was the only officer who showed any concern. She got her a blanket to cover up. It is sad, indeed, that Officer French is no longer with us.
In related news, Los Angeles police have failed to halt dogfish slaughter in the wet markets of Arcadia
Qualified immunity baby. It attracts people who like to terrorize old ladies and shoot dogs.
Two surprises: One was that an actual crime with alleged victims was even a remote and distant factor. The other was that they didn't simply throw down some guns and dope and use that as pretext to confiscate the house.
They need to come to DC for Police Week and get tips from the Baltimore cops.
Until we start holding bad cops personally liable for their misdeeds, these will continue. End qualified immunity, decertify all public sector unions and rewrite the liability laws such that municipalities are on the hook for the officers’ legal defense but that the officers themselves (and not the taxpayers) must pay any and all judgements when they are found guilty.
Yes, those changes will disincent some people from becoming cops. As evidenced here, some of them clearly should be in a different line of work. More importantly, those changes will incent the good cops to get the bad ones out of the system sooner so they don't share the liability.
Excellent comment. Completely agree. Garnish their police pension funds for victim restoration.
The cops can get proffesional liability insurance like many of us have to.
If your warrant is to find a person, what the heck does cutting open the couch cushions and dumping drawers have to do with anything ? Even if you found the person you're looking for, you would get sued for doing stuff that has nothing to do with the warrant , wouldn't you ?
Yeah it looks like this was an arrest warrant not a search warrant. Unless the suspect has sewn himself into a couch cushion it's just police state terrorism.
It must have been a search warrant for a very tiny midget.
Sorry, didn't mean to flag your comment
Desperate hope to find anything even the slightest bit illegal so they could justify their actions after the fact.
What's funny is even with all the idiotic laws forbidding all manner of things the cops STILL couldn't find anything illegal.
I hope Carrasco walked right the fuck past them.
Lead raid officer and next level up official need to be fired and their pensions forfeited to the families they illegally raided and detained. It's the only way to lessen the chance the same thing will happen to another 'wrong address' victim. The only way.
Yes, Reason has been virtue signaling and wallowing in self-righteous indignation for decades, without actually making any useful political proposals.
“…without actually making any useful political proposals.”
Twat, Reason.com has NEVER-EVER suggested SHRINKING THE POWERS OF GOVERNMENT ALMIGHTY to help fix such problems? Or seriously WHITTLING DOWN on “qualified immunities”? Twat planet, planetary-plane, galaxy, or parallel universe do YOU reside on or in?
Making any proposals? They usually hit the two cases of SWATting and/or 'wrong address' no-knock raids bookending about every 3-5 yrs. and fill the gap with 50 or so "Some people did some mostly peaceful things. Yada yada yada. The cops are guilty because someone got arrested." anti-proposal, or even clearly defining the problem, or even providing all the facts it would take anyone else to identify the problem, propaganda pieces.
Proposals were old Reason. Since Gary Johnson and Jo Jorgensen got involved it's been 'Bake the Cake' and 'We should support the protestors' Teen Reason.
"although officers knew or quickly realized that they were not in the right unit, they continued to ransack Carrasco's house, cutting open couch cushions, flipping mattresses, and dumping drawers." Faith-based asset-forfeiture, meet qualified immunity. If they had shot the grandkids, that's the locals' problem. Any settlements can be paid off by additional faith-based asset-forfeiture and qualified immunity, right?
No knock warrants need to be banned. People are going to get killed; especially when the police get the address wrong. To an innocent homeowner, a ‘no knock’ warrant being served at 5 a.m. is indistinguishable from a home invasion. If someone armed kicks in your front door, shooting them is not an unreasonable reaction. How long before a police officer or an innocent homeowner is killed because of this nonsense?
It has already happened in at least two states - Mississippi and Arizona. Those two come to mind out of memory. I'd be surprised if there aren't other cases I don't remember or haven't read about.
The big surprise here is they didn't just bust the door open.
They waited for someone to open it.
One step forward would be cracking down on steroid use by police officers.
You have to remember that police departments are made up of people who are not very bright. In truth, an above average IQ is a disqualification from any police department. They want’em stupid and with an attitude. The results of which are clearly indicated. Another problem is the militarization of police departments. Dressing up as soldiers in a civilian populace has a negative affect along with the attitude that it’s us against them. Meaning the police vs the civilians. There are times when it calls for such but that’s few and far in between. SWAT raids to look for a supposed wanted person and then at the wrong address do nothing to advance positive attitudes towards police and in fact create even more distrust.
I think it'd be funny if 226 South Comstock caught fire, and the authorities didn't bother to tell/evac the residents of 228 South Comstock.
I mean, we don't want to accidentally bother the people who are literally living under the same roof in an adjacent room, that technically happens to be classified as a separate residence with a direct internal access point (albeit, a likely locked one, but regardless the absence of which would evidence an apartment rather than a duplex, which is a key point here) between the two rooms.
But no, let's not consider the architecture here at all. Emergency response should definitely stick to literal property boundaries. Whether it's a murder suspect, or a fire, or a gas leak, or whatever else - if it's only happening in one side of a building, just go ahead and ignore the other side completely. If the carbon monoxide alarm in 226 goes off, it's no concern of 228.
"The building is a duplex with two separate front entrances, both with addresses clearly marked."
Also when advised of the wrong address, the police continued to hold the hostages.
The fire department would have done the same.
What, hold the wrong people hostage?
ACAB/FTP