No, Low Interest Rates Did Not Justify Adding Trillions of Dollars to the National Debt
Especially because the once-dismissed possibility of rising rates is now a reality.

Countless financial soothsayers and Wall Street wizards were once members of a curious cult. Their doctrine? The unshakable belief that interest rates had managed to find something resembling the fabled Fountain of Youth, leaving their numbers eternally low and never rising. The "Forever Low" brigade dismissed those of us who argued that high government debt was unsustainable and, partly because low repayment rates would not last forever, we should control spending.
Now, let's be clear. Predicting the economic future isn't like reading the morning weather forecast. Nevertheless, the certainty of the Forever Low cult felt a bit like confidently asserting that winter would never come to Alaska because June was particularly warm. Interest rates have historically fluctuated due to various economic factors. Somehow, many believed that the unprecedented period of declining and low rates over the past few decades had become the new normal, never to change much.
Every time someone would suggest that rates might increase in the future, and thus recommend a turn toward more fiscal discipline today, the Forever Low club would raise their eyebrows, smirk, and summarily dismiss such heresy. "That's quaint," they might imply before proceeding to tell us how wrong we were to have predicted inflation and higher rates after the 2008 financial crisis.
True enough, I was one of those who didn't understand that new Federal Reserve policy at the time meant that inflation would not, in fact, break out. I also didn't see coming the next 15 years of super-low rates alongside growing government indebtedness and a money supply steadily inflated through what seemed like permanent quantitative easing.
Yet I never felt it was wise to bet on rates remaining low as a justification for going further into debt. After all, even low rates on a growing amount of debt mean larger and larger interest payments. That in turn would mean that more of our revenue would have to be devoted to interest rather than spending on government programs that people value.
In a way, the curious cult's certainty was impressive. It's not every day we witness such unwavering confidence in the face of rising red ink. It was even more stunning during the pandemic, when we saw the national debt rise by $5 trillion over a mere two years. That included $2 trillion in March 2021 with no call for future austerity, a time when the economy was already recovering and inflation was thus significant.
When inflation warnings became hard to ignore, the Forever Low gang retorted that it was silly to worry because, in the worst-case scenario, "the Fed has the tool to bring inflation down." That tool amounts to hiking interest rates to slow down the economy—which seems in direct contradiction to the belief that debt accumulation was OK because, you know, interest rates would remain forever low.
But then, as fate (and economics) arranged matters, the winds shifted. Whispers started circulating about tangible changes on the horizon. The first signs were subtle, but soon the murmurs became louder. The once-dismissed possibility of rising rates is now a reality. With the yield on a 10-year Treasury yield above 4.5 percent, the new refrain is that we could ignore deficits in the past, but we can't anymore.
Of course, this too is wrong. We should have never ignored deficits, which, along with spending and debt projections, were on an uphill trajectory that made us susceptible to a crisis if interest rates rose suddenly—especially since half of our debt has a maturing time of three years or less.
Faced with higher rates, the Forever Low caucus has weakened. Yet it seems to have been replaced with a sense that these high rates are transitory and will inevitably fall back down. I predict they'll be as transitory as inflation was supposed to be, which is to say longer than one thinks.
The inflation problem has been stubborn, and if the rising interest payments are paid with more borrowing as opposed to fiscal restraint, inflation will only worsen, triggering more interest hikes and more interest payments. That's a vicious cycle that, short of some economic growth miracle driven by a wonderful innovation, can only be stopped with fiscal contraction.
In the end, the Forever Low believers were correct in their own transitory way. After all, interest rates did remain low for an extended period, catching many by surprise. Their main mistake, though, was tragic: concluding that there was no cost to trillions of dollars in additional debt.
COPYRIGHT 2023 CREATORS.COM.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
But stonks go up
Stocks, too!
Well, looks like SouthPark has gone full Kultur War hurr durr.
Because the budget does not distinguish between current and capital expenditures, merely borrowing more just because rates are low isn’t necessarily a good idea.
But if one can finance capital expenditures cheaply with an objectively determined imputed rate of return on the investment, borrowing more to fund capital expenditures not only makes sense, not borrowing more becomes foolish unless there’s good evidence for a crowding-out effect, and I’ve not seen any.
(FWIW this doesn’t mean that there is no such evidence – there may be and I would change my opinion if the evidence were good, but I just haven’t seen it. )
And if anyone claim that the government can never build projects efficiently, that doesn’t prevent it from paying private companies to build projects efficiently – admittedly there being plenty of room in practice for private companies to rip off the government.
Except government doesn't "invest," it funnels money from productive people who are good at making it grow, to unproductive leeches with lavish pensions and benefits who belong to public employee unions who donate to politicians to help them get elected so they can keep the gravy flowing. It has nothing to do with "investment." And it does "crowd out" productive investment, because people have less of their own money to invest. How could it not?
When the government borrows money, it is not "funneling" money from productive people. It is just borrowing money. If productive people want to lend the government money, let 'em.
And it does “crowd out” productive investment, because people have less of their own money to invest. How could it not?
No-one is being forced to invest, duh. Further, you're making the assumption that the buyers of USTs are generally individuals. The issue of "crowding out" is whether as a result there is less money available for other borrowers - who might as a result have to pay more to lenders to get the lenders to switch from USTs to corporate bonds or loans.
As I said, if there's evidence, let me know.
You have stated your opinions. How about providing some facts to back them up?
If you need to borrow more to make the minimum payments on your existing debts, technically you're already broke.
All of that debt could have been converted to longer maturities, and the debt ceiling could have, I don't know, actually capped the debt, and a way out of the mess could have been underway by now.
Only if you stopped going further into debt.
According to Paul Krugman, inflation is over. You just have to ignore food, energy, and used vehicle prices and it's gone.
oh yeah, forgot housing. Have to ignore those prices.
But for the cheap crap you buy from China? Inflation is over. And I guess video games and media.
Just ignore the cost of a new AAA vidya being $80 and the prices of all your streaming platforms going up or adding advertisements. The basic rule holds though, wherever you see less for your dollar just close your eyes and the inflation disappears.
I AM Making a Good Salary from Home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing, under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone. go to home media tech tab for more detail reinforce your heart
OPEN GO HERE↠↠↠ http://Www.DailyPro7.COM
The deficit spending crowd and all the other iterations of government social spending don't have to be cautious because no one ever holds them accountable for being wrong. The people who elect our lords and masters never learn that there is no free lunch.
Speaking of ten year bonds, why would Michigan State, or any football team, give a ten year, guaranteed extension to a coach on the basis of one good season?
Thats fine as well as you plan well,
Social Media and APk
fiddle leaf fig
https://bongeats.com/
Seed Capital Loans and Mortgages have been an absolute game-changer for me! I cannot express enough how grateful I am for their services. From the moment I reached out to them, their team was incredibly helpful and supportive. They guided me through the entire process, making it seamless and stress-free and you can also explore more reviews on https://seed-capital.pissedconsumer.com/review.html . The application process was a breeze, and their knowledgeable staff answered all my questions promptly. I was pleasantly surprised by how quickly they approved my loan and mortgage. The terms and conditions were fair and transparent, giving me peace of mind. What truly sets Seed Capital apart is their personalized approach. They took the time to understand my unique financial situation and tailored a loan and mortgage package that perfectly suited my needs. Their competitive interest rates and flexible repayment options made it even more convenient for me.