Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Reason Roundup

Zelenskyy Goes To Washington

Plus: Rupert Murdoch retires, Ibram X. Kendi blew through millions of dollars, and more…

Liz Wolfe | 9.22.2023 9:29 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Zelenskyy/Biden meeting | Julia Nikhinson - Pool via CNP/CNP / Polaris/Newscom
(Julia Nikhinson - Pool via CNP/CNP / Polaris/Newscom)

Bad luck for Zelenskyy in D.C. On Thursday, Ukrainian President Volodymr Zelenskyy met with President Joe Biden, making his plea for greater U.S. support for the war effort against Vladimir Putin's Russian invasion. Though the White House had just announced a $325 million air-defense package for Ukraine, "the Biden administration has opted not to provide Ukraine with long-range missiles known as ATACMS that would allow Kyiv to strike well behind Russian lines," reports Axios.

 Zelenskyy's plea for an additional $24 billion also does not look likely to materialize, as Rep. Chip Roy (R–Texas) and Sen. J.D. Vance (R–Ohio), along with six senators and 22 members of the House, used the occasion to voice their opposition to that high dollar amount of Ukraine aid. As Republicans in the House continue to oppose spending bill proposals, the U.S. government inches closer to shutting down, provided appropriations cannot be agreed to by the Sept. 30 deadline.

Meanwhile, as Zelenskyy has been in the U.S. this week, relations between Poland and Ukraine have soured due to a grain dispute, and Poland has declared it will no longer arm Ukraine. Also this week: "Nearly 50 children from Russian-occupied regions of Ukraine were taken to Belarus… with the help of a charitable foundation that has been accused of facilitating Russia's forcible deportations of Ukrainian children," reports The New York Times. 

On Tuesday, while in New York, Zelenskyy addressed the general assembly of the United Nations and sounded alarm about the kidnapping and deportation of children from occupied regions.

Kamala Harris, here to secure the border and end all gun violence? The White House has created a federal Office of Gun Violence Prevention and tasked Vice President Kamala Harris with leading it. "Every time I've met with families impacted by gun violence as they mourn their loved ones, and I've met with so many throughout the country, they all have the same message for their elected officials: 'do something,'" [President Joe] Biden said in a statement.

This, apparently, is that something. It's not clear how this office will actually work to solve the problem, nor is it clear that Harris' previous busywork—supervising the administration's border strategy—was completed successfully. No information has been released on how much funding this office will gobble up, either.

Agents of the state hopefully held accountable: This week, Reason's Billy Binion has been covering the Tony Timpa wrongful death trial from Dallas.

In August 2016, "Timpa told a [911] dispatcher that he was having a mental health crisis," saying "he had schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression, and anxiety and that he had not taken his medication. Two private security guards handcuffed Timpa and waited for the cops." Timpa was then held down by police officers in a prone restraint for over 14 minutes as he cried out, asking them to stop and telling them he was going to die. The police officers joked as they held Timpa down. Following his death, the government refused to give Timpa's family the body camera footage of the incident, and then invoked qualified immunity to shield the cops from civil liability (which was later appealed and overturned). "Tony Timpa's story shows how far the government goes to prevent victims of abuse from seeking recourse," notes Binion, who has covered this case extensively.

Now, finally, Timpa's case will be weighed by a jury. Trials like these are "incredibly valuable fact-finding tools—particularly when the defendants are government employees who may have violated the Constitution at the direct expense of the taxpayer," writes Binion.


Scenes from New York:

New York City is trying to do what virtually every city in the developed world already does — putting trash in garbage cans — and some NIMBYs aren't having it because the status quo of trash and rats spewed all over the sidewalks give that "cute neighborhood feeling"… Holy f*ck! pic.twitter.com/SNgyIf3pT2

— Aaron Carr (@aaronAcarr) September 20, 2023


QUICK HITS

  • Did Ibram X. Kendi's Center for Antiracist Research just blow through $30 million in two years?
  • Stunningly bad ideas for how journalists should cover Trump vs. Biden.
  • Dispatches from the Senate, which now has no real dress code:

Fetterman looks like he's about to tell you that he found half a cat in the air conditioner he was working on yesterday. pic.twitter.com/Iy4ZuiswuJ

— Tony Kinnett (@TheTonus) September 21, 2023

  • At 92 years old, Rupert Murdoch is retiring. His son Lachlan will now oversee the Fox empire in his place.
  • Argentina "isn't just a place of multiple truths and ready arbitrage, it's a place in real crisis where the pegs and stories and chewing gum holding things together are all failing," reports Karl T. Muth for Noahpinion. ("Cualquier cosa es major que pesos," says one bitcoin ATM sign Muth encounters.)
  • "Jackson's experience is a warning to the vast majority of Alexa users and smart home dwellers who… are increasingly at the mercy of the tech they have embedded into their lives and bedrooms," writes Tablet's Jarod Facundo in his investigation into the story of a black man who Amazon accused of making racist remarks in private.
  • Incredible:

san francisco's new approach to combatting property crime is encouraging victims to have less property pic.twitter.com/f7pg0lL7Fd

— Mike Solana (@micsolana) September 21, 2023

  • On Tuesday, Indonesian TikTok influencer Lina Lutfiawati was sentenced to two years in prison and more than $16,000 in fines. Her crime? Eating pork rinds, which is considered haram and is forbidden by the government.
  • No Curtis Mayfield or Marvin Gaye, really? Jann Wenner defends his picks for best artists in his new book, The Masters, but ends up sounding… a bit sexist and racist. (His defense of Rolling Stone's journalistic malpractice is similarly stunning.)
  • Inside China's disturbing war on drugs.
  • About 45 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 and 29 live with their parents—roughly the same rate as in the 1940s. (People should do whatever they need to in order to scrape by, but Failure to Launch Syndrome disturbs me. It's almost like cities should loosen bad regulations to allow more housing to be built!)
  • Nightmare blunt rotation!

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: IRS Targeting More Supposedly 'High-Income' Americans Than Advertised

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

Reason RoundupJ.D. VanceVolodymyr ZelenskyyUkraineMilitaryForeign AidRussiaDefense SpendingJoe BidenBiden AdministrationKamala HarrisGun ControlPolice AbusePolitics
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (454)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Jerry B.   2 years ago

    Seems that Democrats always want to do something about gun violence by going after the guns, but not the violent - punishing the law abiding and not the criminals. Feature or bug?

    1. R Mac   2 years ago

      Everyone except Jeffdeesarc knows that answer.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

      Let's see. Law-abiding gun owners mostly white and rural. Violent criminals mostly POC (at least by proportion) and urban. Which group fits the "despised" DNC category?

      1. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

        Which group fits the “despised” DNC category?

        Both, really. Just one group they pretend not to hate in order to pander for votes.

      2. Michael Ejercito   2 years ago

        Just remember.

        The same side that advocates decarceration, the same side that accuses the police of habitually hunting down and gunning down unarmed Black men, the same side that accuses the criminal justice system of being systemically racist...

        ...is the same side that advocates for stricter gun control laws which would be enforced by these very same police in this very same system.

    3. Unable2Reason   2 years ago (edited)

      "gun violence"

      What about regular ‘ol violence? If somebody murders you with a knife, as you’re flying away into the ether, are you going to look back and go: “Thank God I wasn’t killed with a gun!”?

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

        You will if you are a dedicated Democrat. But then you suffer from fewer victim points in progressive heaven.

        1. Jerry B.   2 years ago

          You’re assuming that dedicated Democrats might possibly get to heaven. Especially considering so many of them are anti-theists.

          1. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   2 years ago

            Democrats have no souls.

      2. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

        Again not defending Democratic gun policies, but this argument is deliberately obtuse. You can’t, for example, commit mass murder at a country music festival from a hotel window across the way with a knife.

        1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

          It would be better to use a bomb.

          1. JesseAz   2 years ago (edited)

            Why we should ban pressure cookers and fertilizer and the cars that carry the bombs.

            1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

              Ban all metal objects and "chemicals".

              1. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

                Ban everything that exists, since everything that exists is chemicals.
                🙂
                😉

        2. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

          Obtuse...

          Odd, coming from Mr. Obtuse himself, Mike Laursen. Laursen, you do realize that knives can be thrown, right?

        3. Zeb   2 years ago

          Sure, but such scenarios account for approximately 0% of murders.
          Of course guns are more effective weapons, that's why people want them. But I tend to agree that making "gun violence" a special category that gets all the attention is kind of silly.

        4. JesseAz   2 years ago (edited)

          Not defending policies, just criticizing all arguments against those policies. Good work Mike. I see you can’t criticize dem gun policies you pretend to not be supporting.

          Words from critics is worse than actions from dems.

          Also search for mass stabbings.

          1. Outlaw Josey Wales   2 years ago

            I'll give you an easy one. The recent Idaho stabbing murder of the college students in their home.

            1. soldiermedic76   2 years ago

              Which happened at my alma mater and I drove by that house every day to class and my folks live 13 miles from there and my SIL lives in Moscow with her son and husband.

        5. Idaho Bob   2 years ago

          You can’t, for example, commit mass murder at a country music festival from a hotel window across the way with a knife.

          You defend your life against a genocidal government with a knife either. The Second Amendment was included to kill government agents should the need arise.

          1. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

            I don't disagree with your observation, but it also is not relevant to what I said.

        6. Unable2Reason   2 years ago

          They said "gun violence". Nobody said anything about mass murder. The office is called Office of Gun Violence Prevention. Not Office of Gun Mass Murder Prevention.

          Why are you more concerned with 5 people being killed at once than 5 people being killed individually? How many individual people have been killed in Chicago in the last month? Are any of them looking back and going: "Thank God I wasn't killed in a mass shooting!"?

          Why are you being deliberately obtuse?

          1. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

            Why are you more concerned with 5 people being killed at once than 5 people being killed individually?

            I didn't indicate my level of concern in any way, but my point is that any honest look at the world will acknowledge that guns are much more effective at killing people than knives.

          2. R Mac   2 years ago

            “Why are you being deliberately obtuse?”

            Mike Liarson is a squawking bird named Dee and should be treated as such.

          3. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

            No dead of any number are looking back at anything and thinking anything because death is final. All the more reason to defend the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, so you can defend the only life you have.

            1. Truthfulness   2 years ago

              Jesus would like to have a word with you

        7. Jerry B.   2 years ago

          A longbow and a bunch of arrows could do a pretty decent job. Ask the French.

          1. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

            In the Vegas mass shooting I used as an example: “[Paddock] fired more than 1,000 bullets, killing 60 people[a] and wounding at least 413.”

            It would be something to see one guy do that with a longbow and a bunch of arrows.

            1. soldiermedic76   2 years ago

              A warbow had a draw weight in excess of 110 lbs and a range of 300 meters. A good archer could put twenty arrows into the air in under a minutes and fire them in such a manner that they all hit at approximately the same time. With that draw weight, using a bodkin arrow against someone not in plate armor, the arrow would pass straight through, even at maximum range, with little loss of momentum. Firing into a crowd from an elevated, barricaded position, you'd be amazed at how many casualties he could rack up.

              1. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   2 years ago (edited)

                Or just start tossing some grenades into the crowd. They’re not that hard to make. Or just load up a series of drones with C4 or something similar.

          2. soldiermedic76   2 years ago

            Well, at least those that didn't end up as porcupines at Crecy, Portier and Agincourt.

    4. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

      Not defending it, but there is a logic to it: nobody knows in advance who the violent ones are going to be.

      1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

        It’s easier if we assume everyone is a criminal.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

          Please lock us all up!

      2. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

        See the lesson in Logic 101 below. This is more than "a blog to read over coffee" if you pay attention.

        1. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

          I’ll quote myself from my comment you are replying to: “Not defending it”.

          Your critique of Democratic logic addresses a different aspect of their arguments than I addressed. I agree with you that “do something” is bad policy.

          1. R Mac   2 years ago

            Just because you preface your defense of something with a lie, doesn’t make it less of a defense.

          2. JesseAz   2 years ago

            You still defended it twice despite your claim.

          3. Super Scary   2 years ago

            "I’ll quote myself from my comment you are replying to: “Not defending it”."

            Same energy as "I'm not racist, buuuuut..."

            1. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

              Sorry I’m not sufficiently hateful toward Democrats.

              1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

                I would gather that it's hard to be hateful toward Democrats when you are one, Dee.

              2. JesseAz   2 years ago

                You have zero hate to your beloved party.

              3. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   2 years ago

                You are their creature.

      3. JesseAz   2 years ago

        You defended it twice.

      4. Michael Ejercito   2 years ago

        So disarm FJB's Secret Service security detail, just in case?

      5. Dillinger   2 years ago

        >>but there is a logic to it

        no, there's authority to it.

        1. Mike Laursen   2 years ago (edited)

          Of course. There is proposed use of government authority. That doesn’t negate that there is a logic to it.

          1. Dillinger   2 years ago

            logic is logic. authority is rationale. not the same.

            1. Mike Laursen   2 years ago (edited)

              Agreed, not the same. They are orthogonal.

    5. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

      "Every time I've met with families impacted by gun violence as they mourn their loved ones, and I've met with so many throughout the country, they all have the same message for their elected officials: 'do something,'" [President Joe] Biden said in a statement.

      A little lesson in Logic 101:

      Although the following syllogism seems formally correct, it is not an argument, much less a valid argument:

      We must do something!
      Gun control is something!
      Ergo, We must do gun control!

      The invalidity lies in the equivocal use of "something," referring both to the Universe of actions at large and a particular action, as well as the Appeal to Emotion Fallacy in the initial and second premises.

      Not an argument.

      1. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 years ago

        Thank you.

        1. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

          You're welcome. And this applies equally to any policy or course of action du jour this is predicsted upon emotionalism, apocalypticism, and desperation.

    6. Eeyore   2 years ago

      Does anyone else see "The Joker" when they look at Kamala?

      1. JesseAz   2 years ago

        Same cackle too.

      2. Dillinger   2 years ago

        leave Caesar Romero out of this.

      3. Super Scary   2 years ago

        Which one? The one true Joker, Jared Leto, or one of the other ones?

        1. Eeyore   2 years ago

          Her own rendition. More sociopath than the Jared Joker.

      4. Fats of Fury   2 years ago

        No, Mr. Ed.

        1. R Mac   2 years ago

          Oh come on man, AOC is way more attractive than Kamala.

      5. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

        Only if The Joker did a whole bong of the really sticky stuff and didn't hold Gotham City hostage "Because He Got High."
        🙂
        😉
        She"s just not manic enough to be The Joker.

    7. Fats of Fury   2 years ago

      There's always the Bukele way.

      1. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

        Bukakke? Oh wait, I need a new prescription of glasses.
        🙂
        😉

  2. Minadin   2 years ago

    How much have we given cumulatively to Ukraine so far? (Just since February 2022)

    1. JFree   2 years ago

      Most of what we've given has been excess out-of-production inventory.

      The talk about what that costs is mostly a fraud. A deliberate attempt to avoid discussion about why we are replacing Cold War inventory.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

        Can I come and take your excess inventory?

        1. JFree   2 years ago

          You R's are so corrupt and fraudulent

          Would you prefer that the inventory be sent to police departments to be used against Americans? You all love that shit and that's the only time you R's don't talk much about the SUNK COST of inventory as if it is replacement cost. Inventory which, by the fucking way, was intended to be used against the expansionist goals of the Soviet Russian Empire.

          You people are such clowns. You now have the chance to end or at least massively reduce the FUTURE obligations to NATO. Instead, you choose to perpetuate the MIC goal to 'always replace inventory so we can keep the permawars going everywhere around the world'

          1. JesseAz   2 years ago (edited)

            JFree thinks police stations have stingers and artillery.

            You now have the chance to end or at least massively reduce the FUTURE obligations to NATO.

            Also is fucking retarded.

          2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

            JFree "logic":
            1. JFree writes something stupid.
            2. Somebody criticizes JFree.
            3. That person must be a Republican!

            If not actually retarded, then very close.

            1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

              He's something almost, but not quite entirely unlike a retard.

            2. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

              Just dishonest and arguing in bad faith. He knew what he was doing.

          3. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

            Excess or unnecessary weapons inventory should be dismantled or destroyed.

            1. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

              Or sold at auction to U.S. Citizens, who then can send them to Ukraine if they choose, with all proceeds going toward the National Debt.

              1. JesseAz   2 years ago

                Half the Ukraine spending isn't even weapons. They spent billions buying Ukrainian pensions to fund.

              2. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

                I've heard this idea before that the libertarian solution for defending foreign countries would be for private citizens to be the ones to send aid to foreign countries.

                There is an obvious problem with a nation-state whose private citizens are running their own foreign policies. Just imagine a scenario where a wealthy Egyptian citizen is buying weapons for Iran. It would be considered a case of Egypt "harboring" terrorism or some similar rhetoric.

                Same would happen if a US citizen were supplying significant weaponry to Ukraine. Russia would consider it to be military aid coming from the United States.

                1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

                  U.S. citizens are supplying weapons to Ukraine. Just because Joe sweeps his hand over it doesn’t mean citizens aren’t paying for them.

                2. JFree   2 years ago (edited)

                  This 100%. That said private citizen (aka terrorist, drug lord, mercenary, arms dealer, etc) sending arms involves them in the war and creates a very legitimate military target. So that someone opposing them who say blows up their office building within the US killing hundreds of civilians has now just created a legitimate casus belli for the US govt to now get involved much more seriously and in an uncontrolled manner.

                  It’s a form of blowback that is completely uncontrollable unlike say the shit that the CIA or Pentagon does which only remains uncontrollable as long as it remains secret.

                  AlQaeda was financed by rogue elements of the extended Saudi royal family (a family which has many thousands of family members) for a long time. That’s a big reason 9/11 happened. It's also a reason why we went into Iraq in the aftermath of that.

                  1. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

                    Thank you.

                    1. JesseAz   2 years ago

                      When leftist idiots agree.

                3. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 years ago

                  No it isn't that complicated. All you need is the Pentagon/State Dept posting what they are willing to sell and to which countries and allow Americans to bid on it on behalf of the approved foreign country. The only change is that American citizens would get to decide if the arsenal got sent. The Americans wouldn't need to accept delivery of arsenal they order.

                  But I also suspect that the cost of dismantling/destroying is more than the shipping costs to Ukraine - but that probably comes down to weapons systems.

                  Its also untrue that this is all from excess stock since we have Patriot weapons systems deployed in Ukraine.

                  1. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

                    So, like a bake sale for foreign aid?

                    Yes, that would be voluntary while still allowing the nation-state to maintain a consistent foreign policy.

                  2. JFree   2 years ago

                    The Patriot system is the one current (afaik) bit of capital equipment sent to Ukraine. The US is, for obvious reasons, not interested in sending current equipment to Ukraine to be either diverted or captured. A discussion about replacing Patriot batteries - seven in total which does involves cost beyond sunk-cost - is entirely legitimate.

                    However - it is also very clear that the Ukraine war has shown that Patriot systems are massively expensive overkill for cheap drone attacks. One would think a discussion re that (which really only peripherally involves Ukraine since that war has proven to everyone around the world that cheap drone attacks are effective now) would be more fruitful than simply 'let's just keep buying Patriot systems and missiles'.

                    1. JesseAz   2 years ago

                      You dont know a fucking lot then. I've mentioned 2 other systems in this very thread dumbass.

                    2. JFree   2 years ago

                      Missiles themselves (eg Stingers) are ammunition.

                      Ammunition is the material fired, scattered, dropped, or detonated from any weapon or weapon system.[1] Ammunition is both expendable weapons (e.g., bombs, missiles, grenades, land mines) and the component parts of other weapons that create the effect on a target (e.g., bullets and warheads).

                      The Stinger system - launcher and missile - is obsolete. That is why the Pentagon has not bought anything in years and possibly the last decade. Yes the missile is ammo. The launchers will not be replaced.

                      If the Pentagon was sitting on its butt for a couple decades now delaying its replacement, that is NOT a Ukraine-created problem. It was delayed because the Pentagon wanted to spend money on big-ticket shit to blow up mountain goats and hillbillies from long-distance. And hasn't been intending to defend the US against a real enemy who has planes and missiles.

                      Are you saying that real armies with planes and missiles are by definition the friends of the US while mountain goats and hillbillies are the reason for the US to spend $1 trillion per year on 'defense'? And that therefore, now that the US has seen an actual real-life war between two serious militaries, the US should continue to use an obsolete Manpads system and consider it current even though we haven't bought anything in years?

                    3. JesseAz   2 years ago (edited)

                      Stingers consist of both a launcher and a missile. The launchers are reusable. It is a system ignorant fuck. Both are produced by different contractors.

                      The next generation stoner system was a 5 year bid with likely 7 years to production.

                      Wars don't wait until you are ready. Legacy stingers are still effective. Military systems have contractual 30 year life.

                      Again. Youre talking from ignorance.

                4. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

                  Naturally, this means sales to persons who aren't engaged in hostilities against the U.S., as Iran is.

            2. Fats of Fury   2 years ago

              Joe just hands them off to the Taliban

          4. damikesc   2 years ago

            We're bankrolling NATO as is. The only way to cut future obligations is to leave.

      2. R Mac   2 years ago

        Amazing.

      3. Rev Arthur L kuckland   2 years ago

        The correct answer is it should be 0

      4. JesseAz   2 years ago

        This is 100% false. Which is why we are low on bullets and scrambling to create next generation stingers. There is no current replacement.

        Like most topics JFree talks from ignorance.

        1. Zeb   2 years ago

          But he makes up for it with condescension and arrogance.

          1. R Mac   2 years ago

            Zeb’s conversion to Mean Girl is progressing nicely.

            1. Mike Parsons   2 years ago (edited)

              Good, good.

              Seriously though, I see Zeb on here as a pretty down the middle guy. The more insane lefties are just getting so ridiculous he doesn't have the patience to suffer them anymore

            2. Zeb   2 years ago

              Don't get too excited.

              1. R Mac   2 years ago

                Too late!

            3. Outlaw Josey Wales   2 years ago

              Zeb’s conversion to Mean Girl is progressing nicely.

              He'll know he's made it when he's properly muted and joins the Grey Box Alliance

              1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

                Which one? Sarcasmic's or Mike Laursen's?

        2. Unable2Reason   2 years ago

          When we sabre-rattle China now, it's just an empty scabbard. The sword we gave to Ukraine.

        3. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

          Ignorance is puting it mildly in JFree's case. If he had knowledge of even a tenth of what he yammers on about, he might actually be somewhat dangerous.

        4. JFree   2 years ago (edited)

          Ammo is not remotely the majority of what we’ve sent.

          It does however raise a legitimate national security issue – that is very much related to cost – that you people are still not addressing AT ALL.

          Namely, if a fighting war breaks out with Russia, North Korea, and Iran all on the same side making ammo – and we don’t have the capability to counter that; then perhaps we have seriously fucked up our defense/strategy priorities for a couple decades. Spending way too fucking much on big-ticket capital equipment and way too little on production CAPACITY (not inventory) for ammo/supplies.

          I’m sure the Reason/globalist crowd has a solution – let’s just import ammo from China.

          You MAGA crowd also have a solution – Russia, North Korea, and Iran are our friends. NATO are our only enemies. So we don’t need to change our ammo production capacity. Oh really?

          Of course increasing production capacity when needed fits more into the model of ad hoc militia mobilization not of a standing army with tons of ammo in inventory. But NO ONE is talking about that.

          1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

            You are definitely speaking above your capacity.

            1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

              And out of his anal aperture.

          2. JesseAz   2 years ago (edited)

            For fucks sake. Did you miss the comments regarding stingers? And then you claimed we were giving them to the police. Lol.

            Much of what was sent over were current defensive capabilities we can no longer manufacture, parts no longer exist, with DoD now scrambling to replace.

            Production programs are on average 5 to 7 years. You can't have ad hoc production moron. Parts obsolescence is a huge issue. Technology changes much faster than the 1920s. God damn your display of ignorance.

            Ukraine is not part of NATO fucking retard.

            Leftist commie statist shit.

            1. JFree   2 years ago

              Much of what was sent over were current defensive capabilities we can no longer manufacture, parts no longer exist, with DoD now scrambling to replace.

              There you go. Now you're yapping about replacing obsolete capital equipment (v supplies/consumables like ammo) as if that decision is something that cannot possibly be challenged or debated. You people really are useful idiots for the MIC.

              We had 30+ YEARS to have a serious discussion about NATO - who is the post-Soviet threat, what is the US role or is there one, how do we get Europe to do something other than parasite - with people who matter. You know - diplomacy among allies. 'Noninterventionist' did nothing. They never do because they prefer to know nothing as well. So the 'deep state' (careerists not your conspiracy folks) did what they do. And no - the drunk on a barstool approach (Trump) was neither new nor productive of anything. It's simply a drunk on a barstool looking for whoops and applause from the peanut gallery.

              So instead - the decisions force themselves over time. And now take place in a context where noninterventionists become nothing but useful idiots.

              You can’t have ad hoc production moron.

              Yes you can. Just because you people prefer a standing army and don't give a shit about what the 2A really means or what a militia-based defense can do, doesn't mean the status quo is the only possible option. You people were just as blind with what a militia could do with a public health issue, which left you clowns pissing into your shoes against a standing army of professional public health bureaucrats. That worked well didn't it.

              You people are simply not serious adults. I understand. That's a requisite part of that strain of libertarian/R nihilism that just wants to rail against gummint - like a drunk on a barstool.

              1. JesseAz   2 years ago

                Everything you say is too wrong to even be from ignorance.

              2. soldiermedic76   2 years ago

                An obsolete/older functioning weapon system you actually possess is far more useful than a future combat system you have to wait for to be produced. What a fucking idiot. If I had to choose between going into combat today with a M1903 Springfield or no rifle at all, but the promise that eventually I'll get issued an M-5 (once production starts), I know which one would be my choice and only an idiot would choose the latter option. There's a reason that the US Army still is issuing M-4 rifles despite officially adopting the M-5 over a year ago, moron. You don't withdraw a weapon system until you have the new system in place and manufacturing capacity necessary to replace the old system. For reference look up the P-36, P-40, F4F etc. You fight with what you have on hand not what you'll have tomorrow. Anyone who is running down our supply and inventory today with the plan of eventually replacing it later is putting the entire country at risk. Period. No quibbling allowed. You fight with what you have, even if outdated. Period. End of fucking discussion.

                1. JFree   2 years ago (edited)

                  Fight who. Are we invading Mexico? Or are they invading and reconquering Aztlan? Does the Taliban have an entrenched front line?

          3. R Mac   2 years ago

            That’s a whole lot of bullshit for one post.

            1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

              He's trying to compensate for Jeffy's absence.

              1. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   2 years ago

                Did Fatfuck finally die after his stomach exploded subsequent to a trip to Golden Corral?

          4. damikesc   2 years ago

            You really have no clue what you're talking about. At all.

      5. soldiermedic76   2 years ago

        Bullshit!! Tell that to my son's unit, whose M1A2sept1 are deadlined and retired and we're supposed to be replaced in January with M1A2SEPT3 but instead those tanks were sent to Poland (the M1A2SEPT3) so Poland could send Ukraine their old T-72. Or the artillery section of his unit which hasn't done a live fire exercise in over a year because there's a shortage of 155mm shells because we sent them to Ukraine. According to the reports I've read, we've sent so much of our munitions to Ukraine that we have about 6 weeks of inventory if the balloon goes up. And we don't have the manufacturing capabilities to replace the inventory for a decade. I know the soldiers and it isn't excess inventory. It's severely impacting training for our troops.

        1. R Mac   2 years ago

          In Jfree’s defense, he’s a moron.

    2. R Mac   2 years ago

      Last I knew it was over 100 billion.

      1. Minadin   2 years ago

        100 billion dollars is $700 per taxpayer on average.

    3. Rev Arthur L kuckland   2 years ago

      2...much

    4. Kungpowderfinger   2 years ago

      “Zelenskyy Goes To Washington”

      When did he fucking leave?

    5. Jerry B.   2 years ago

      A lot less than most of NATO, based on percentage of GDP.

      https://www.bbc.com/news/66870559

  3. Idaho Bob   2 years ago

    Kamala Harris, here to secure the border and end all gun violence? The White House has created a federal Office of Gun Violence Prevention and tasked Vice President Kamala Harris with leading it.

    I'm expecting some New Mexico-style EO from Biden.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

      Backed up with BJs from Harris?

      1. Rev Arthur L kuckland   2 years ago

        Bj from Harris, or bj with harris

        1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

          Both are deadly.

        2. Eeyore   2 years ago

          "Get down there you little cuck", Kamala.

    2. mad.casual   2 years ago (edited)

      I’m expecting some New Mexico-style EO from Biden.

      L… O… L… When you say “New Mexico” is that a reference to Michelle Lujan or the Johnson/Weld LP ticket?

      For those that don’t recall, this “Special Vice Presidential Task Force” was *The* Libertarian Party Platform position in 2016.

      Even further, it was *The* Libertarian Party Platform position in 2016 after the Obama/Biden Administration used the same “Special Vice Presidential Task Force” to generate and perpetuate the “1 in 4 women” myth and Title IX/Dear Colleagues BS that Reason nominally opposed.

      1. Idaho Bob   2 years ago

        Michelle Wuhan.

        I see Biden trying a "health emergency crisis" and invoking the supremacy clause.

      2. R Mac   2 years ago

        I was the worst Trump cultist of all time when I voted for that idiot.

        1. mad.casual   2 years ago

          Loser.

          +1 Write in for Ron Paul.

  4. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

    Man, if I had scrawny, splayed legs like Fetterman, I'd never wear shorts. At least stop skipping leg day, dude.

    1. Idaho Bob   2 years ago

      How in the fuck did that thing ever win a senatorial election?

      1. Sandra (formerly OBL)   2 years ago

        A combination of factors.

        1. Weak Trump-endorsed GOP candidate.
        2. Friendly media covering up the extent of his health issues.
        3. Dem voters are so obedient most of them would have lined up for Hoodie McStrokebrain even if he'd been in a coma.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

          And if not fortified voting, at least illegal manipulation of the process.

        2. Rev Arthur L kuckland   2 years ago

          4 ballot stuffing

        3. Minadin   2 years ago

          We actually had Democrat voters in MO elect a dead guy to the Senate once.

          1. R Mac   2 years ago

            I believe Pennsylvania also elected a dead guy in the same election as Fetterman.

            1. Unable2Reason   2 years ago

              Fetterman must surely be the lead candidate in some sort of Dead Pool somewhere. Maybe a Brain-Dead Pool.

              1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

                Fetterman looks like Frankenstein forgot to install the brain before animation.

                1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

                  "Abbie Normal"

                2. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

                  "Puttin' On The Riiiiitz!"
                  https://youtu.be/ab7NyKw0VYQ?si=lb5wmEyDKFNXrLaT
                  🙂
                  😉

                3. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   2 years ago

                  Fetterman looks like the result of Pluto from the original ‘Hills Have Eyes’ fucked Uncle Fester and they had a shit baby.

              2. Anomalous   2 years ago

                Uncle Fester's head on Lurch's body.

            2. Eeyore   2 years ago

              Most competent candidate they ever elected.

        4. JesseAz   2 years ago

          And Pennsylvania keeping the same illegal election changes from 2020. You missed the biggest one.

      2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

        Hate to break it to you, but people are retards, especially in mob mode. The more Democracy! we get, the worse our country will be.

      3. Kungpowderfinger   2 years ago (edited)

        So is Fetterman wearing what he wants supposed to show his bravery in overcoming his mental disabilities?

        WTF, handlers?

    2. Kungpowderfinger   2 years ago

      Fetterman looks like he's about to tell you that he found half a cat in the air conditioner he was working on yesterday.

      Don’t insult this country’s hardworking HVAC professionals by comparing them to this lazy slob.

      1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

        Why is he carrying a picture of a face?

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

          Are you sure it is just a picture?

      2. mad.casual   2 years ago

        Hard working? All they do is remove them!

        You probably just assume those cats cut themselves in half and then get installed into air conditioning units all on their own don't you?!

      3. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

        Future historians will refer to this session as the "Buttcrack Congress".

        1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

          Cite?

    3. Fats of Fury   2 years ago

      Fetterman should wear a hospital gown along with the over 80 crowd, the rest should wear togas.

      1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        "the rest should wear togas."

        I can actually get behind that idea.

    4. soldiermedic76   2 years ago

      This just shows he doesn't even respect himself enough to not look like a complete slob. Okay, don't want to wear a suit, fine, but theirs a lot of options between looking like an out of work UPS driver and three piece business suit.

      1. Outlaw Josey Wales   2 years ago

        Sadly, a good tailor could make his goofy body look half way respectable.

  5. Idaho Bob   2 years ago

    On Tuesday, Indonesian TikTok influencer Lina Lutfiawati was sentenced to two years in prison and more than $16,000 in fines. Her crime? Eating pork rinds, which is considered haram and is forbidden by the government.

    And yet you praise long sentences for trespassing.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

      Also, pork rinds are not vegan or green, and thus violate the WEF human feeding guidelines.

      1. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

        the WEF human feeding guidelines.

        "Bugs and a side of Soylent Green are part of any balanced diet." - Claus Schwab, probably

        1. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

          The Postmodern equivalent of the Fifties Hamburger Sandwich with a Garnish of French-Fried Po-Tatoes. Just what a growing Teen needs!
          🙂
          😉

    2. R Mac   2 years ago

      Do you think they call them pork rinds, chicharróns, or something else there?

      1. Ska   2 years ago

        Forbidden cracklin'.

      2. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago (edited)

        They even have a song about it done to the tune of Leadbelly’s “Black Betty”:

        “A Pig Named Betty!
        Haram-Ba-Lam!
        A Pig Name Betty!
        Haram-Ba-Lam!…”
        🙂
        😉

        1. R Mac   2 years ago

          Ha, nice.

          1. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

            Best I could come up with on a moment's notice. Chumby and Utkonos have the jokester game on lock. They're too smart and busy to waste too much time here.

            I wonder if one of them wrote the Subway PRaO-ferred commercials?

            https://www.ispot.tv/ad/18fK/subway-proferred-anthem-ft-stephen-curry-jayson-tatum-peyton-manning-mallory-swanson

    3. JesseAz   2 years ago

      Be fair to Reason. They only wanted 12 years for knocking over a fence, not 17.

    4. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

      Who praised long sentences for trespassing?

      1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

        The same people who justify shooting unarmed citizens in the face for trespassing on public property.

        1. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   2 years ago

          Pedo Jeffy?

      2. JesseAz   2 years ago

        Selection bias Mike. Where did they criticize multi month sentences for people just walking on the Capitol grass? Where have they defended the arrests, solitary, no bail arrests for non violent J6 people (the majority)

        The closest they came was saying PB shouldn't get terrorism charges. That would make the charges 12 years, not 17 or 21.

        Who the fuck do you think you're tricking?

  6. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

    "Did Ibram X. Kendi's Center for Antiracist Research just blow through $30 million in two years?"

    Since accounting and even numbers are racist, Kendi was forced to use his antiracist super powers and vaporize all that cash. Also blow jobs.

    1. Minadin   2 years ago

      The better question is, did they really only manage to produce 2 original papers with all of that time and capital?

      https://freebeacon.com/democrats/ibram-kendis-center-for-antiracist-research-hasnt-produced-any-research/

      1. R Mac   2 years ago

        Doing actual research is white supremacy.

    2. Eeyore   2 years ago

      You have to actually hire the prostitutes to explore how racism is impacting them. It is a slow expensive process.

  7. Sandra (formerly OBL)   2 years ago

    "nor is it clear that Harris' previous busywork—supervising the administration's border strategy—was completed successfully"

    Have we considered the possibility that the border situation is exactly what Biden and his handlers want it to be?

    #CheapLaborAboveAll

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

      Can we bus them to the auto factories shut down by UAW strikes?

      1. Jerry B.   2 years ago

        Not sure I’d want to drive the cars they built.

    2. R Mac   2 years ago

      Yes. And it’s not just cheap labor. Buy ammo.

  8. JFree   2 years ago

    Why the fuck does Reason link to NYT? It's a goddamn paywall site.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

      Really?

      1. JesseAz   2 years ago

        His only issue is the pay wall. Not being the mouth of the DNC.

        1. Ska   2 years ago (edited)

          In fairness I also read the Times, mostly to better understand the stupidity of the hour. I really love their 60% comment rejection rate as well, perfectly completed with a lack of acknowledgement, indication, or chance to revise.

          As opposed to the WSJ, my other mainstream news choice, which pretty much immediately posts any comment (without obscenities, they aren’t fans of that). And if your comment doesn’t get posted, they will give you a warning (again, immediately) and allow you to revise. Perhaps not ideal but at least fair and workable.

          1. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

            Who would have thought the progressive outlet would be the one for curated speech and solidification of their brain-worm bubble

            1. Ska   2 years ago (edited)

              Well according to Times readers it’s the Republicans that censor and curate speech. 😀

              It’s always Republicans. Pretty much every comment section on any article on any problem in any part of the world – Republicans.

              1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

                For the pretentious elite, it's always "those people".

              2. R Mac   2 years ago

                See Jfree above, lol.

          2. Super Scary   2 years ago

            I'm actually surprised to hear that they even have a comment section.

          3. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   2 years ago

            I understand. I like to read fiction too. Though usually not democrat fan fiction.

        2. JFree   2 years ago

          I read all sorts of shit that doesn't fit some ideological pigeonhole. I won't even bother explaining why that approach is far better than preselecting sources that agree with and are vetted by other sources you already agree with.

          1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

            I read all sorts of shit

            Believable.

            1. R Mac   2 years ago

              Explains so much.

          2. JesseAz   2 years ago

            Cite of you reading anything of worth?

            Most of your arguments are leftist narratives or based in ignorance. See above.

            1. soldiermedic76   2 years ago

              Cite for him being able to read.

            2. JFree   2 years ago

              None of my arguments are based on some DeRp narrative. Those are what YOU understand the world to be divvied up into.

              Here's one site - RealClearWorld It's just an aggregator site re stories that are outside the US. I look at it every day and read maybe two or three articles. That one also has aggregator sister-sites (accessible from the toolbar near the top) focused on markets, science, US politics (yes that's DeRp), policy (wonk stuff), book reviews, defense, energy, etc. And there are plenty more. Most of which are really far more credible than the above because they aren't based on journalism sources.

              There's an entire world of info out there on the Internet. Most of it has nothing to do with DeRp politics or ideology. Some of it isn't even in English. Maybe you should learn to surf outside your safe little kiddie pool.

              1. JesseAz   2 years ago

                Lol. Jfree thinks he is the only one who reads realworldX suite of sites.

                The 2 or 3 are always leftist sources based on your narrative pushing of the dems buddy.

                1. JFree   2 years ago

                  You've never cited a fucking thing beyond zerohedge or fox.

          3. Super Scary   2 years ago

            "I read all sorts of shit"

            Well, I like to read the news, but you do you I guess.

            1. R Mac   2 years ago

              When he’s finished reading, he gives it to sqrlsy.

              1. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   2 years ago

                I thought SQRLSY just read his own shit, like reading tea leaves. Before he eats it.

          4. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

            So you admit you read shit.

    2. Gaear Grimsrud   2 years ago

      Incredibly Reason editors actually pay to read dreck. And it clearly influences their attempts at journalism. I'm going to exclude Liz who's doing a great job lately.

    3. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

      I think a lot of the staff have subscriptions so they forget about the paywall. They never see it.

      I'm still able to see the articles because my local public library has a subscription. All I have to do is enter my library card information. A lot of other commenters here probably have similar setups at their local library.

  9. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

    '"Every time I've met with families impacted by gun violence as they mourn their loved ones, and I've met with so many throughout the country, they all have the same message for their elected officials: 'do something,'" [President Joe] Biden said in a statement.'

    Since Democrats have eliminated families, at least among their preferred minions, they have no choice but to eliminate guns.

    1. JesseAz   2 years ago

      Does he tell them all about his son dying in war or his dead ex wife like he does soldiers?

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

        No, but Joe does tell them how he was first on the scene in Sandy Hook.

  10. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

    Did Zelensky meet with Kendi, and compare notes on how to make millions or billions vanish?

    1. R Mac   2 years ago

      At least Zelensky has a couple hundred thousand dead Ukrainians to show for it.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

        Thousands of dead white people? Now Kendi is interested.

  11. Rev Arthur L kuckland   2 years ago

    Can't Ukraine cover the cost with their child organ harvesting money?

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

      Not after they paid Hunter for all his expert consulting.

      1. Eeyore   2 years ago

        Most profitable consulting ever.

      2. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   2 years ago

        He’s an expert on getting pegged by his hooker while smoking crack.

    2. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

      I don't think your notorious AutoCorrect could produce something like that. That is in the delusional realm of blood libel.

  12. Sandra (formerly OBL)   2 years ago

    "san francisco’s new approach to combatting property crime is encouraging victims to have less property"

    Well what do Koch-funded libertarians propose? Getting tougher on criminals?

    LOL nope! Can't have that! Goes against your sugar daddy's #EmptyThePrisons agenda. 🙂

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

      Hmm, if we have to constantly buy more stuff to replace what is stolen, er, legally appropriated under social justice guidelines, then the market keeps expanding, right?

      1. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

        legally appropriated under social justice guidelines

        I believe the current preferred euphemism is "proletariat shopping." Or does that only apply to looting, not petty theft?

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

          That only applies in "stores". Out in residential neighborhoods, the preferred terms are "finding" and "reparations".

        2. Ajsloss   2 years ago

          "Cuttin' it up." Don't you even Chicago?

      2. BYODB   2 years ago

        Bastiat has a sad.

    2. Kungpowderfinger   2 years ago

      “Emptying your car helps us #emptytheprisons”

      Find out more at Pleaseplaceyourheadinyourass.ca.gov

  13. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

    Sen. Bob Menendez and wife indicted on bribery charges, Justice Department says
    Kara Scannell
    By Kara Scannell, CNN
    Updated 9:44 AM EDT, Fri September 22, 2023

    TWO TIERED JUSTICE SYSTEM! WITCHHUNT! ARGLE BARGLE!

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

      Beer for breakfast?

      1. R Mac   2 years ago

        No, he’s just a moron.

      2. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

        The standard excuse for some corrupt scumbag pol who is indicted...

        TWO TIERED JUSTICE SYSTEM! WITCHHUNG! I'M INNOCENT!

        1. Sevo   2 years ago

          turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
          turd lies. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

        2. JesseAz   2 years ago

          Real charges without novel construction vs novel theory of law construction. Discuss.

          1. R Mac   2 years ago

            That isn’t in his email.

        3. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

          This is Menendez second time around Pluggo. Once the heat is off Biden do you think that there will be more hung juries like last time?

          1. JesseAz   2 years ago (edited)

            He was only caught with 70k on stuffed envelopes and 100k in gold bars this time.

            No evidence.

            They were consulting bills for his wife. Not bribery. Prove where Bob touched the money.

        4. damikesc   2 years ago

          Klansmen were charged in the South in the 40's and 50's.

          THE JUSTICE SYSTEM WAS EQUAL!!! --- SPB 2.

      3. Super Scary   2 years ago

        It counts as bread, so he's fine.

    2. Sevo   2 years ago

      turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
      turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

    3. Mother's Lament   2 years ago (edited)

      Sacrifice scapegoat for Biden?

      I mean it’s not like he hadn’t been already charged multiple times in the past for this stuff.

      “The corruption trial of Menendez ended in a mistrial in November 2017 after the jury reported it was deadlocked. Both men denied all of the charges. Following the mistrial, a federal judge acquitted them of several of the charges in 2018.”

      Funny how you forgot to mention that Pluggo.

      1. Minadin   2 years ago

        And the Senate Subcommittee on Ethics found him guilty, and sent him a sternly-worded letter:

        "The Committee has found that over a six-year period you knowingly and repeatedly accepted gifts of significant value from Dr. Melgen without obtaining required Committee approval, and that you failed to publicly disclose certain gifts as required by Senate Rule and federal law. Additionally, while accepting these gifts, you used your position as a Member of the Senate to advance Dr. Melgen's personal and business interests. The Committee has determined that this conduct violated Senate Rules, federal law, and applicable standards of conduct. Accordingly, the Committee issues you this Public Letter of Admonition and also directs you to repay the fair market value of all impermissible gifts not already repaid."

        https://www.ethics.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/49c12c75-7a26-4fe6-b070-19fcef4d7532/senator-robert-menendez---public-letter-of-admonition.pdf

    4. JesseAz   2 years ago

      This is what, his third indictment? Watch DC juries let him off again.

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

        One less than Fatass Donnie.

        1. R Mac   2 years ago

          You were banned for posting kiddie porn links.

          1. Outlaw Josey Wales   2 years ago

            An obvious witch hunt. 🙂

        2. JesseAz   2 years ago (edited)

          Yes. You’ve proven you love lawfare and novel legal constructions that only charge a person you hate. You’ve proven your left allegiance many times.

          You hate Menendez because he went against Obama once.

        3. Sevo   2 years ago

          turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
          turd lies. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

        4. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   2 years ago

          Die. You’re a pedophile. Your kind has no place in our country.

  14. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   2 years ago

    I'm agonna come right out and say Liz is a whole lot better than ENB.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

      Not quite light years, but damn close. I'll fully agree that Liz is 110% better than ENB. And no, I don't miss the sex worker and abortion links.

    2. Idaho Bob   2 years ago

      Especially from a libertarian POV.

    3. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

      Now White Mike's going to start ragging on her for being somewhat libertarian, and we can tell him to shut up and enjoy his blog with coffee.

    4. R Mac   2 years ago

      Pretty strong consensus on this. The irony is White Knight has muted everyone giving Liz credit.

      1. JesseAz   2 years ago

        Did you see Mike yesterday again praise himself as White knight? Pretending he wasn't white knight?

        1. R Mac   2 years ago

          Yeah. It’s pretty fucking pathetic.

        2. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

          No I missed it.

          First he comes out and say's "It was me, Mike Laursen", then he pretends it wasn't him, then he admits it was, and now he says it isn't again?

          Aside from the fact that they sound exactly alike and were triggered by the exact same things, if you mute White Knight then Laursen is muted too, and vice versa.

          He really doesn't think this stuff through, does he?

          1. JesseAz   2 years ago

            He is just the greatest programmer in history who can't figure out simple web code or how to unsubscribe from email lists.

    5. Zeb   2 years ago

      Yes. Liz Wolfe morning links are pretty good. With a nice tone of libertarian snark.

      1. R Mac   2 years ago

        Yeah, I almost appreciate the snarky tone as much as the superior content.

        1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   2 years ago

          And she doesn't take herself as seriously, keeps her commentary short. I sure don't miss 10 paragraphs on Backpage or some sex workers testimony. There are so many things governments do wrong, no need to ride her favorite horses into the ground.

          Wonder who we'll get Monday.

          1. Cyto   2 years ago

            I agree. Links are links. Snark is the appropriate tone.

            And if you want to do a 5 paragraph rant on your favorite subject, do a blog post. Or post it in the comments like a couple of weirdos here in the comments do.

            For good morning links (and bonus afternoon/evening links), try http://www.glibertarians.com

            1. R Mac   2 years ago

              Did sarc really get banned from there?

              1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

                That's what I keep hearing. I'm also curious as to if he was really banned, and why.

              2. Cyto   2 years ago

                I don't think he was ever an attendee.

                They have a cordiality policy. John (poster here for years - since disappeared or renamed) didn't survive there, because he likes to argue for the sake of arguing. So even though he's a conservative attorney which you would think would fit in with a group of mostly right-libertarians, he got kicked.

                Not too many people get kicked - at least not publicly. But they don't allow trolls of any stripe.

                1. R Mac   2 years ago

                  Really? Lol, sarc made a big proclamation about leaving here and going over to glibs, only to return shortly.

                  1. Cyto   2 years ago

                    I may have missed it. I do miss a lot of the drama. I have zero interest in middle school stuff, so I just don't see it. It isn't even a conscious decision.... it just doesn't register at all most of the time.

                    I noticed the John drama because it was fairly drawn out and he really tried not to be a troll... but pathological behavior is... uh... pathological. He actually got banned, apologized, got unbanned, got banned again, if I recall correctly.

                  2. Cyto   2 years ago

                    OK, I asked and apparently he does show up from time to time.

                    Shows how good my skills of perception are.

                    Or perhaps it reveals my own pathology - I don't see the person presenting the ideas, I see the ideas. So a good idea is a good idea. And dumb is dumb, even if Einstein said it. So it takes a minute for me to connect the two. It explains why I didn't go into sales. Names are hard.

                    1. Cyto   2 years ago

                      Worse, I've had plenty of positive interactions.

                      Dang. I'm losing it.

                    2. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

                      Does he sober up before posting there or something? He doesn't appear to be spoiling for a fight with damn near everyone.

                    3. Cyto   2 years ago

                      Nobody spoils for a fight over there. It is super cordial. Probably why i didnt associate the two..

                      Nobody has been banned in a very long time, AFAIK. It has its own culture, and people who are going to misbehave won't want to hang around there anyway. They are the best of people.

          2. R Mac   2 years ago

            I thought she was taking them over permanently?

            Although everyone doing them for a week could be pretty revealing.

            1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

              Exactly. Everyone has his or her own biases and will post articles that follow said biases. Even I do it here in the comments. It would be revealing to see, say Shackleford's links for a week, or Robby's, or even Sullum's. Hell, KMW's links might be the most revealing of all.

              1. JesseAz   2 years ago

                So many links from the dispatch for KMW.

          3. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

            I suppose. We're not going to here as much about sex workers, but it's looking like we're going to hear about New York City every day.

      2. Minadin   2 years ago

        I like the snark. It's also one of the reasons I like the comments.

    6. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

      Its just such a refreshing pace to have someone that clearly isn't an in-the-bubble leftists doing the links. You can instantly see the shift in tone.

    7. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago (edited)

      Liz Wolfe is mostly all right, but she did say that theatre-vaping, peanut gallery Lauren Boebert was “relatable,” so must wait and see…

      1. Mike Laursen   2 years ago (edited)

        It’s an important distinction that Wolfe wrote “most relatable”, not an unqualified “relatable”. It marks her statement as “damning with faint praise”, which is a form of sarcasm — meaning she was actually implying that Boebert isn’t relatable.

        1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

          LOL . Good thing you aren’t an attorney.

          1. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

            Given that Poe's Law is the Fourth Law of Thermodynamics around here, it is sometimes hard to tell about these things. If it was sarcasm, as it likely was, it was very deep dish, I'll give Liz credit there.

  15. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    Disturbing.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/britains-parliament-demands-rumble-x-deplatform-russell-brand

    Two hundred and fifty years ago, Great Britain bequeathed to us our notions of due process and free speech. That country, however, no longer exists. Instead, we have a country that is demanding that Russell Brand, who has been accused of alleged sexual wrongdoing that occurred decades ago (charges he denies), must be deplatformed from Rumble, a site built upon free speech. Fortunately, Rumble is standing strong.

    During those same years of debauchery, Brand was an out-and-proud leftist, as well as an edgy (very edgy) comedian. Now, though, during his years of clean living, Brand has become something of a libertarian, talking to people like Tucker Carlson and Ben Shapiro because he stood against COVID and vaccine madness.

    It’s deeply disturbing that a government would try to destroy an individual based on ancient allegations. What’s sad about this action is that it was Britain that bequeathed to us our fundamental concerns with free speech (the First Amendment) and due process (the Fifth Amendment). George Orwell saw it coming, but that doesn’t mean we have to be happy that it’s here.

    1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

      I don't think people realize just how scary that letter actually is. Even if the whole thing wasn't a smear campaign that letter would still be incredibly frightening.

      1. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

        "Open up, police. We have been told that someone who doesn't like you said you may have misgendered someone back in high school. Do you have any defense for your bigotry and hate crimes?"

      2. Cyto   2 years ago

        They've come forth with more. The government also sent letters to the other platforms - The TikTok letter has com out. They also hit TV stations, telling them they are not to interview him.

        https://thepostmillennial.com/uk-parliament-sends-letters-to-social-media-platforms-demanding-demonization-of-russell-brand

        This is next level.

        The twitter files showed that a large swath of western governments were working behind the scenes to censor the internet (in a political way). Now, they don't even bother hiding it. Openly sending threat letters to media, tech companies and probably advertisers (see what WaPo is doing to Dave Portnoy in the latest round of this tactic)

        We are really far down that slippery slope that we've been told doesn't exist.

        1. R Mac   2 years ago

          Portnoy’s response was awesome.

          If you’ve never seen it, his deposition by Michael Rapaport’s lawyer is great. “That went well.”

          https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=m-6Iuiewn-o&pp=ygUgRGF2ZSBwb3J0bm95IHJhcGFwb3J0IGRlcG9zaXRpb24%3D

        2. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

          Why did the House Republicans abandon HR 140?

          1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

            Protecting Speech from Government Interference Act

            Also known as the 1st amendment.

          2. R Mac   2 years ago

            Lol, still taking this completely dishonest stance on this?

            The House PASSED it already. Now it’s up to the Senate, which is controlled by the Democrats.

            Here Dee, maybe this will help you:

            https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OgVKvqTItto&pp=ygUOSW0ganVzdCBhIGJpbGw%3D

            1. JesseAz   2 years ago

              It is amazing he is still going with this talking point.

        3. soldiermedic76   2 years ago

          I mean Biden's handlers sent out marching orders to the media after the impeachment inquiry was launched. Are we really that far behind?

      3. R Mac   2 years ago

        As disturbing as the letter is, it’s reassuring that Rumble responded by telling them to fuck off.

        Now content providers need to step up and leave youtube and post exclusively on X and Rumble.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

      Remember, the Brits have always embraced autocratic rule and consider themselves subjects of the realm. At least we got a skewed sample of reprobates who wanted to try something different.

    3. Zeb   2 years ago

      That is scary and insane. Even if he turns out to be a no-shit rapist (which I very much doubt), why shouldn't anyone be allowed to hear what he has to say on non-rape-related subjects? I can't see this as anything but an opportunistic attempt to silence someone who is saying things they don't want people to hear.

      1. R Mac   2 years ago

        The anglosphere has gone full fascist.

        1. soldiermedic76   2 years ago

          England, as well as America, had a decent sized fascist movement right up until 1939, then they tried to pretend they didn't.

      2. Stuck in California   2 years ago

        That's exactly what it is.

        Free speech is only free if people we don't like are allowed to say things.

        You don't have to listen. You don't have to agree. But if you muzzle them, someone gets to muzzle you, and that's way worse.

  16. Mother's Lament   2 years ago (edited)

    Stunningly bad ideas for how journalists should cover Trump vs. Biden: With democracy on the ballot, the mainstream press must change its ways”

    Woah! This Liz is remarkably different from the last one. ENB would have thought that they were regrettable but prudent.

    “Christiane Amanpour has reported all over the world, so she recognizes a democracy on the brink when she sees one… “We have to be truthful, not neutral,” she urged. “I would make sure that you don’t just give a platform … to those who want to crash down the constitution and democracy.”

    “Let save democracy from mumble-mumble through censorship and rabid partisanship”.

    “News organizations have turned Biden’s age into the equivalent of a scandal.

    Biden’s turning Biden’s age into a scandal.

    “evidence-free Biden impeachment efforts”

    I can’t believe some politruks are still claiming that. Didn’t get the “doesn’t actually matter” memo I guess.

    “Trump continues to be covered mostly as an entertaining sideshow – his mugshot! His latest insults! – not a perilous threat to democracy, despite four indictments and 91 charges against him”

    Those four fraudulent indictments and 91 charges against him are the actual perilous threat to democracy, deliberately interfering with an election. But Goebbels’ are going to Goebbel.

    “The Nobel-winning economist Paul Krugman pointed out last week that the media apparently has failed to communicate something that should be a huge asset for Biden: the US’s current “Goldilocks economy”. Inflation is low, unemployment is low and there’s virtually no hint of a recession.”

    Oh wow! That last line. I can’t even…

    1. Idaho Bob   2 years ago

      Oh wow! That last line. I can’t even…

      Naked propaganda, nothing more.

      1. damikesc   2 years ago

        I've not seen many pieces to show how useless the media is that compete with that gem.

        1. Sevo   2 years ago

          CNN is proud that it's not The Guardian - at least one worse source.

      2. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

        "Oh wow! That last line. I can’t even…"

        "Perpetually wrong and retarded person Paul Krugman...." always would be perfect context for what comes next

        1. R Mac   2 years ago (edited)

          The internet had the same effects on the economy as the fax machine.

        2. Minadin   2 years ago

          If the next administration appoints him and Jim Cramer in charge of the Fed & Treasury Dept, how long until economic armageddon?

    2. JesseAz   2 years ago

      Time to switch 401k to blue chip sticks if that was Krugmans statement.

    3. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

      “I would make sure that you don’t just give a platform … to those who want to crash down the constitution and democracy.”

      So I take it they're not going to be giving airtime to any Democrats anytime soon?

    4. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

      “The Nobel-winning economist Paul Krugman pointed out last week that the media apparently has failed to communicate something that should be a huge asset for Biden: the US’s current “Goldilocks economy”. Inflation is low, unemployment is low and there’s virtually no hint of a recession.”

      You serious?!

    5. Cyto   2 years ago

      Why go with "it doesn't matter" on the evidence-free claim. I mean, I get that it is true... they certainly didn't have that standard for Trump.

      But....

      "Evidence free" is just an insanely obvious lie. The evidence is vast. The Ukraine/Barisma story alone is plenty of evidence. You can choose to ignore it, discount it or simply not care if government officials are on the take. But you cannot pretend that it doesn't exist. That's just a flat lie.

    6. soldiermedic76   2 years ago

      Got to love the progressives cheering on Bidenomics, like we are to stupid to look at our bank account and draw the obvious conclusion. Hell, I went back the nursing last year, making $10000/year than my job as a professor, just got a 5% pay raise in July, and I'm having a harder time making ends meet than two years ago, and we didn't take on any new debt. My grocery bill averages >$200/month more. Gas has doubled. I am selling out my cattle at the end of the fall, despite the highest calf prices in a decade, because input costs are so high that I can't keep operating.

      1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        "I am selling out my cattle at the end of the fall, despite the highest calf prices in a decade, because input costs are so high that I can’t keep operating."

        *Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab wearing monocles and hand-rubbing* - "Just as planned."

  17. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    Ukraine figured out how to piss off Poland.

    https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/09/22/why-tensions-are-mounting-between-poland-and-ukraine/

    The immediate cause of the row is that there is now a glut of Ukrainian grain in central and eastern Europe. As the Black Sea is blockaded by Russia, grain that would have been shipped to Africa and the Middle East has instead ended up in the EU. This has destabilised agricultural markets in Poland, putting extraordinary downward pressure on local prices and causing outrage among Polish farmers.

    In fact, these tensions go back further than the row over grain. Ukraine and Poland, like most eastern European neighbour countries, have a complex and often dark shared history. At various stages over the past several hundred years, large parts of western Ukraine have been ruled by Poles. These rulers showed varying and not always tolerant attitudes to native Ukrainians. For Poles, especially painful were the massacres of Polish minority groups in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia, carried out by forces loyal to Ukrainian nationalist Stepan Bandera during the Second World War.

    Tensions have been ratcheted up further by three other issues. The first is the looming Polish elections, where the incumbent Law and Justice (PiS) party is facing tough competition. The rural vote is crucial to its re-election chances. PiS is losing ground in the polls to the right-wing Konfederacja (Confederation) party, which has started to question Poland’s ‘unconditional support’ for Ukraine and has linked this to the cost of living.

    The second cause is Ukraine’s own blunders.

    The third is the internal politics of the European Union.

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 years ago

      The brutal ethnic cleansing of Polish people carried out by Ukrainians 80 years ago has not been forgotten by the Poles. The entire narrative that the Ukraine is a small and innocent homogeneous nation being invaded by the evil Goliath ignores a whole lot of history.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

        So, reparations?

      2. R Mac   2 years ago

        Yeah, and while it’s easy for our corrupt corporate propaganda machine to convince most Americans that Ukraine is just a poor innocent country, people in Eastern Europe aren’t as easily duped.

      3. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago (edited)

        But didn’t the Russian Goliath oppress and slaughter them all, Pole and Ukrainian alike?

        1. R Mac   2 years ago

          You continue to use simplistic binary thinking on this topic.

        2. soldiermedic76   2 years ago

          Which Ukraine? Because today's Ukraine didn't exist prior to 1945. Almost all the northwest portion was part of Poland, until Stalin forcefully resettled the Poles onto German land after he forcefully resettled the Germans living there west. The war crimes committed by the Soviets in 1944-45 are nearly as bad as their opponents. Basically, between the Mongols, Ottomans/Turkish tribes, Holy Roman Empire and it's successor the Austrian-Hungarian Empire and Prussia, the Brotherhood of the Sword and it's successor the Teutonic Knights, the Scandinavians, the Romans and Greeks, any claim to ancient homeland country in Eastern Europe is historical gaslighting, mainly a latter 19th and 20th century creation.

    2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

      <This has destabilised agricultural markets in Poland, putting extraordinary downward pressure on local prices and causing outrage among Polish farmers.

      So if you get more of a thing... the price goes down?

      Hmm, this changes everything.

    3. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

      "large parts of western Ukraine have been ruled by Poles"

      Because it was Poland and full of Poles... at least until Austro-Hungary took it in the 1760's.

      The "Ukrainians" are Ruthenians, western Rus, the pure original Russians from before the Tartar hordes miscegenated with their eastern brothers and sisters. The Russian and Ukrainian languages are as different as British English and Scottish.
      The Ukrainian SSR was a construct by Joseph Stalin to get another seat in the UN. Before that the territory was always Poland and Russia with the Austrian Empire occasionally nosing in.

      1. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

        So would Austria be justified in invading Ukraine too? To the Donbass but no further? Like You Know Who Else from Austria?...

        1. soldiermedic76   2 years ago

          You do realize that most of the Eastern European countries borders, and several countries, were created whole cloth at Versailles, Yalta and Potsdam, don't you, with no input from the peoples living there? Until 1918, Poland was a landlocked country for most of its history, for example and until the 18th century, Estonia and Latvia were part of Sweden. Most of Northern Ukraine and Western Belarus was Poland and almost all of Western Poland was Germany. Stalin forcefully resettled the Poles and Germans west and moved Russians in, to gain control. When shit like that happened to your grandparents, it's kind of hard for you to fully forget it. Ukraine is a modern construct, created ad hoc after WW2, with the sole purpose of Stalin and Soviet Russia gaining more power over Eastern and Central Europe. That doesn't excuse Putin but it acknowledges that history tends to be far messier than good guys vs bad guys.

          1. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

            Of course. All of this is correct. But civilians and little children should never be fair game for deliberate attack and especially kidnapping for forced adoption and/or slave labor. Putin hit an awful low in modern times with that one.

            1. soldiermedic76   2 years ago

              The kidnappings seems to be evidenced based, but the targeting of women and children seems far more ambiguous. Yes, civilian casualties have been high, but any number of factors could account for that. Bad guidance systems. Poor targeting data. Damaged munitions causing them to go off course. Etc.

        2. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

          Austria signed off of Galicia (the Western Ukraine) in 1917 and most people there were never ethnic Austrians. They were however ethnic Poles and Russians, ever since Poles and Russians first became a thing. And Poland never gave up it's old homeland of Galicia. It was taken.

      2. R Mac   2 years ago

        Yep. Kiev was the “original” capital of the Rus.

      3. soldiermedic76   2 years ago

        It wasn't just the Austrian but also the Hungarian part of that union. Oh, and the Prussians played around a bit too.

  18. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

    Tim Scott slams Trump, other GOP presidential candidates for being 'wrong' on abortion
    Tim Scott charges that when it comes to abortion, Donald Trump, Ron DeSantis and Nikki Haley have "run away from protecting life"

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/tim-scott-slams-trump-gop-presidential-candidates-wrong-abortion

    Chasing the Fundie-Nut vote as a gay man?

    Won't work, Timmy.

    1. Sevo   2 years ago

      turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
      turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

    2. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

      And what evidence do you base your accusation of Tim Scott's orientation on?

      1. JesseAz   2 years ago

        Whoopi Goldberg and Joy Behar from the view said it, shrike believes it.

    3. damikesc   2 years ago

      Homophobic racist SPB going after Scott some more.

      I'm beyond shocked. Really.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

        Maybe he has revealed a secret fetish.

      2. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        "Homophobic racist SPB"

        Don't forget Pluggo's shot at Scott's religious identity too. He's the whole package.

  19. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    School choice for me, but not for thee.

    https://www.illinoispolicy.org/union-bosses-pay-lobbyist-big-bucks-to-kill-school-choice-as-he-sends-his-kids-to-private-school/

    Stacy Davis Gates isn’t the only union boss trying to kill scholarships for low-income students while also sending a child to private school.

    Enter Sean Denney, the director of government relations at the Illinois Education Association, which opposes Illinois’ Invest in Kids tax credit scholarship program.

    Denney sends his own children to a Catholic school in Springfield, Illinois, according to a report by NBC 5 in Chicago. He earns a six-figure income as chief lobbyist for the IEA.

    The IEA pays Denney more than $188,000 a year, according to the union’s 2022 federal filing with the U.S. Department of Labor. That doesn’t account for any other household income he or family members may receive from other sources.

    On the other hand, the average family receiving an Invest in Kids scholarship makes just $45,046 a year.

    1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

      Everyone has school choice now.

      Some people just don't want to pay for their little crumb-crunchers tuition and want the government to do so via vouchers (theft).

      1. Sevo   2 years ago

        turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
        If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
        turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

      2. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

        So you don't think that poor minority kids should have the same opportunities as the rich? Pluggo, so far you've shown that you're a pederast, a bigot, a racist, a misogynist, and now you engage in class warfare against the poor.

        1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

          Education is not the federal government responsibility.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago (edited)

            Dumbass, the scholarship involved is a state program, not a federal program.

          2. Sevo   2 years ago

            turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
            If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
            turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit.

          3. JesseAz   2 years ago

            Fine. Remove all funding. You won't get arguments here. But until then, school choice.

            But you only care about public unions funding your favorite politicians.

        2. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

          He figures most of those kids are probably black, so they deserve nothing.

      3. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

        Some people just don’t want to pay for their little crumb-crunchers tuition and want the government to do so via vouchers (theft).

        It's not theft if I pull my kid out of school. Or... or are you telling me all those decades of the Teacher's Union Thugs telling me how much it costs per child to educate them was a lie?

        Perhaps if we agree on the latter, I'll agree with your assertion that the voucher money has no relation to the costs of educating my child. Otherwise, we can agree to disagree, with the status-quo being: we get vouchers and school choice.

      4. R Mac   2 years ago

        How do you get more retarded? It’s truly amazing.

        1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

          He's a marvel.

  20. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    Gotta love this cashless bail shit.

    https://cwbchicago.com/2023/09/driver-flees-police-crashes-in-lincoln-park-5-weeks-after-a-judge-released-him-from-electronic-monitoring.html

    About a month after a judge decided Gambino Johns didn’t need to be on electronic monitoring for two pending misdemeanors, Johns led Illinois State Police troopers on a high-speed chase across Chicago that ended with a crash in Lincoln Park, officials say.

    During a detention hearing Tuesday, Judge Mary Marubio ordered him to observe a 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. curfew when he goes home.

    He won’t be able to do that until he sees Judge Stanley Hill, who is handling his two pending retail theft cases, on Thursday.

    When Johns appeared in bond court for the second case on August 6, Judge Kelly McCarthy ordered him to go onto electronic monitoring. But Hill nixed the electronic monitoring requirement two days later.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

      But once we legalize all behavior, the crime rates will drop!

      1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        Don't worry, they still get to have armed security.

    2. Fats of Fury   2 years ago

      Chicago has morphed into Johannesburg.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

        At this point, Johannesburg might be safer.

    3. soldiermedic76   2 years ago

      Trying to come up with something pithy involving Chicago and Kurt Russell/Snake Plisken. It seems appropriate at this point.

  21. Sevo   2 years ago

    "The White House has created a federal Office of Gun Violence Prevention and tasked Vice President Kamala Harris with leading it..."

    There are those who will imagine she's 'doing something'.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

      Doing something or someone.

  22. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    I've been down to the border there, back in late 2014. At the time, it seemed like a fairly peaceful place, a couple days before Thanksgiving. How much has changed.

    https://nypost.com/2023/09/21/joe-biden-protects-illegal-texas-migrants-not-the-border/

    Tiny Eagle Pass, Texas, just saw a migrant surge equal to almost half the town’s population (just 29,000).

    Biden responded by sending 800 troops to the area — not to reinforce the border, but to protect the illegal crossers.

    As many as 8,000 more illegal migrants are reportedly on the way to Eagle Pass. The question now is: How long until the town holds more migrants than citizens?

    The besieged community has declared a state of emergency, with its Democratic mayor fearful for the future of its fire and police departments.

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

      As many as 8,000 more illegal migrants are reportedly on the way to Eagle Pass. The question now is: How long until the town holds more migrants than citizens?

      Biden has a jobs program in the works that'll *checks Reason bylines* reduce government spending on migrants... which *checks old Reason bylines* the government doesn't spend.

      1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        Koch Libertarianism sure is interesting.

      2. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

        which *checks old Reason bylines* the government doesn’t spend.

        Cite?

        1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

          Roar you mighty Sea Lion, roar!

          Or try googling it...

    2. JesseAz   2 years ago

      Think of how rich Eagles Pass is about to become - sarcasmic.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

        Quick! Set up a bunch of Octoberfest tents, and buy a few truckloads of beer. I hear Bud Light sells at a discount.

      2. R Mac   2 years ago

        As long as they have enough work permits to go around.

  23. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    Kamala Harris, here to secure the border and end all gun violence?

    Man, they really want to poison her to the electorate, don't they. She's been way ahead of them on that.

  24. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    Now, finally, Timpa's case will be weighed by a jury.

    I can't wait to see what cretins they find to sit on this one.

  25. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    Did Ibram X. Kendi's Center for Antiracist Research just blow through $30 million in two years?

    They just kept finding more racism to fund against.

  26. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    ...trash and rats spewed all over the sidewalks give that "cute neighborhood feeling"… Holy f*ck!

    The same geniuses who lamented modernity coming to quaint Cuba.

    1. Fats of Fury   2 years ago

      Well the fat lady sang so it must be over.

  27. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    Stunningly bad ideas for how journalists should cover Trump vs. Biden.

    Truthfully, in any form, would be nice.

    1. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

      Ha. That article is worth a read.

  28. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    Dispatches from the Senate, which now has no real dress code...

    It's like mainstreaming the developmentally delayed into school classrooms. Everyone benefits from special needs distractions.

    1. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

      It’s like mainstreaming the developmentally delayed into school classrooms.

      Conspiracy theory: Fetterman didn't actually have a stroke, he's just retarded.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

        Why not both?

  29. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    His son Lachlan will now oversee the Fox empire in his place.

    Seems like this might have already started happening.

  30. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    ...the story of a black man who Amazon accused of making racist remarks in private.

    "We apologize for the inconvenience, but your Alexa unit has lowered your social credit score to below the threshold for fulfilling your Dockers pants order. We look forward to serving you once you do better."

    1. damikesc   2 years ago

      MUH PRIVATE COMPANIEZ!!!

      1. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

        So, what is your answer?

        1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

          What is yours?

          1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

            Well regulated, top-down "libertarianism".

        2. damikesc   2 years ago

          Clearly, private entities should have absolutely zero regulations on them. If you use their service, you've clearly agreed to let them do whatever they want to you, right? You can always stop doing so....theoretically. Except here. But, hey, should never have gotten involved in the first place, amirite?

          1. soldiermedic76   2 years ago (edited)

            The biggest problem with the muh private company argument is that many who use it use it to give cover for any criticism of a companies actions. I’ve seen it often from both comments and writers here on Reason. Criticism doesn’t equal regulation or law. I can say a company can do something, but still say that that something is wrong. It’s like the ‘the 1A only applies to the government’ to counter arguments that social media censorship violates free speech. The 1A does limit government, but free speech, in spirit, goes far beyond simply government actions. Yes, the private company can censor, legally, but morally it violates the spirit of free speech. That’s their right as a company or individual but it doesn’t inoculate them from criticism for those policies either. Especially, when they try to portray themselves as the modern public square.

            1. soldiermedic76   2 years ago

              The problem I see with many self acclaimed Libertarians is that they seem to argue that libertarians shouldn't criticize private individuals or corporations. That there is no morality.

          2. Mike Laursen   2 years ago (edited)

            Essentially correct. Especially if we are talking about something as unimportant as, say, Twitter.

            I can see the case for civil rights laws that say a grocery store cannot refuse to sell food to anyone, for example. But nobody *needs* to tweet.

            And you still didn’t say what your solution is.

            I hinted at mine above when I asked about why HR 140 died in committee. It was exactly the right solution, and it’s been abandoned by Congress.

            1. soldiermedic76   2 years ago

              Because you've been told this every fucking single day, the house passed it and Schumer killed it in the Senate. You fucking disingenuous motherfucker. You are told this multiple times every fucking day and still act as if you aren't aware of it. This is why everyone calls you a lying sack of shit.

    2. Fats of Fury   2 years ago

      Wait until it locks him out of the house.

  31. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    san francisco's new approach to combatting property crime is encouraging victims to have less property

    Thieves are already on it.

    1. damikesc   2 years ago

      Amazing how much more convenient every possible option outside of "punish the criminal" is, ain't it?

  32. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    Her crime? Eating pork rinds, which is considered haram and is forbidden by the government.

    Also not healthy, which burdens health systems.

  33. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    Jann Wenner defends his picks for best artists in his new book, The Masters, but ends up sounding… a bit sexist and racist.

    A book. That's why we're being subjected to this guy's intellect lately.

  34. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    About 45 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 and 29 live with their parents...

    Kick those parents out already.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

      Stupid boomers/Gen-Xers/Millennials refuse to die!

      1. Fats of Fury   2 years ago

        I have serious doubts about millennial and z-ers ability to use a can opener.

  35. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

    Did Ibram X. Kendi's Center for Antiracist Research just blow through $30 million in two years?

    *sigh*

    Reason: Is this anti-racism Kultur-war hurr durr stuff a scam?

    1. I, Woodchipper   2 years ago

      Culture war is when normal people resist the radical changes pushed on them by bolsheviks.

  36. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    Nightmare blunt rotation!

    Late night hosts without their writers. I can't imagine the bleakness.

    1. R Mac   2 years ago

      They weren’t exactly funny WITH their writers.

    2. mad.casual   2 years ago

      Everyone pretend podcasting isn't boring.

  37. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

    No Curtis Mayfield or Marvin Gaye, really? Jann Wenner defends his picks for best artists in his new book, The Masters, but ends up sounding… a bit sexist and racist. (His defense of Rolling Stone's journalistic malpractice is similarly stunning.)

    New York Times... who's calling Wenner "a bit racist and sexist" here, Reason or the New York Times, because I have to figure out if any of this is real or just Kultur War Hurr Durr stuff.

  38. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

    "Jackson's experience is a warning to the vast majority of Alexa users and smart home dwellers who… are increasingly at the mercy of the tech they have embedded into their lives and bedrooms," writes Tablet's Jarod Facundo in his investigation into the story of a black man who Amazon accused of making racist remarks in private.

    Reason, this story is like 8 months old. What's next, a story about Yoel Roth and twitter censorship of mean tweets from the New York Post?

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

      They have to play catch-up somehow. Shit, it only took them a couple of years to figure out the feds involvement in censoring Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube.

    2. Cyto   2 years ago

      This is an insanely good comment. Bravo!

    3. R Mac   2 years ago

      Wait until you hear about the basis for the Mueller investigation!

    4. Dillinger   2 years ago

      "challenge accepted." ~~ Sullum

    5. Mike Laursen   2 years ago (edited)

      So, *checks for a point to Diane/Paul’s comment*, you want to impose some kind of time constraint on what Reason can discuss? Would you follow the same time constraint in the old events you refer to in your comments?

      1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

        “It’s just a blog to read over coffee “, yet you defend it at every turn.
        Kinda sad.

      2. Cyto   2 years ago

        Why would you post that? Why would you even think it?

        "checks for a point"???

        clearly you aren't so dumb that you didn't get the point. So why say that? And clearly you understand the validity of the point....

        I am completely baffled. Is this just team-based snark - anyone who is on "the other team" gets snark if they attack one of your own?

        Is this a reason insider being butthurt?

        This just makes no sense. We have a couple of articles that are way over in the "too little, too late" camp - in the face of a commentariate who excoriated them for not covering and even poo-pooing such issues - and you think there is no point to such a comment?

        Snark is appropriately pointed and directly over the target. These issues should have been front and center at a Libertarian magazine way back when they happened. Reason should have been tearing the censorship regime up before Taibbi, with multiple authors. They should have done original reporting on the amazon story instead of a blurb. And they damn sure shouldn't have spent a decade telling us "Nothing to see here, move along" about all the related issues that culminated in these stories.

        1. Cyto   2 years ago

          But, it turns out that Koch is a major player in the censorship regime, being a founding donor to the Stanford Internet Observatory - one of the key groups facilitating the "journolist on steroids" that controls the media and big tech.

          So I guess that explains why none of this was happening and it totally isn't coordinated and they are private corporations anyways and hey, you should probably just shut up and not talk about this conspiracy theory garbage, ya big Alex Jones fanboy!

          1. Dillinger   2 years ago

            ^^^ body blow! body blow!.

        2. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

          You said above you don't follow people, so you are probably not aware of Diane/Paul's pattern of being a team player for the right, and of taking ingracious potshots at our hosts, Reason, on a regular basis. It's extremely tiring, both on Diane/Paul's part and all the other commenters in the Reason-bashing club.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

            Oh, go blow it out your ass, Dee. You're a team player for the liberal-tarians, those here who are libertine, not actual libertarians. You mute anyone who gives you ample evidence to contradict your message, narrative, and general world view, and then claim no one has any evidence to the contrary.

          2. JesseAz   2 years ago

            Reminder. Mike can declare anyone else to be on team MAGA. Don't ever call him the obvious leftist he is though.

          3. Cyto   2 years ago

            So.... you are a reason insider?

            There's plenty of scorn heaped on the reason staff - but 90% of it is in direct response to things worthy of scorn. This knee-jerk defensiveness is weird.

            Usually the trolls are pathological or paid shills. Neither would be. emotionally attached to the editorial stance of the former flagship libertarian publication. And claiming there's nothing worthy of "bashing" from our hosts makes you sound like you are reason's Karine Jean-Pierre.

            So dish... what's the real reason? Dating the editor? Work in accounting? Junior copy editor? Enquiring minds want to know!

            1. Mike Laursen   2 years ago (edited)

              Right. Weird that I actually like the magazine/institution whose website I’ve been coming to for years and years, and find the club of right-wing, non-libertarian Reason bashers irritating. (Especially their continual steam of dishonesty, team partisanship, rudeness, and cultivated victimhood.)

            2. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

              “but 90% of it is in direct response to things worthy of scorn”

              Highly disagree. Especially in Diane/Paul’s case, where she/he is in the habit of making little snarky remarks. And rarely going beyond passive-aggressive comments to say anything of substance. And, by the way, bringing up loads of politics from the past.

    6. Fats of Fury   2 years ago

      His being black and no one home at the time is a new twist. Does section 230 protect Amazon over this? He should sue to find out.

  39. I, Woodchipper   2 years ago

    Bad luck for Zelenskyy in D.C. On Thursday [] Though the White House had just announced a $325 million air-defense package for Ukraine,

    Getting ONLY 325mil of my money is "bad luck"

  40. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

    This is an article.

    How Climate Week in New York Turned Into ‘Burning Man for Climate Geeks’

    NEW YORK — It’s almost like the climate crisis has gotten itself a new team of publicists, judging from the boggling array of sessions, panels, VIP dinners, workshops and fireside chats happening this week as part of Climate Week NYC.

    Among the record number of 585 official affiliated events: Breath work to build resilience within the climate movement, workshops on ecologically friendlier wine, an ice cream giveaway to highlight “climate risks to the flavors we love,” and at least five sessions aimed at stemming the environmental ravages caused by the clothing industry, including a daylong circular fashion festival.

    This was in addition to two sold out Earth-focused drag shows, “SAVE HER!” hosted by the eco-drag queen Pattie Gonia, and the spectacle of Prince William wading into New York’s East River to visit the Billion Oyster Project, which works to restore reefs using mollusks. There were hundreds of less glittery events too, focused on decarbonizing agriculture, deforestation-free cattle ranching, carbon removal, environmental justice, food waste, green steel, and session after session on climate finance and climate tech.

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

      Chaotic, sprawling, and borderline circuslike, Climate Week NYC, which officially runs through Sunday, is in many ways a showcase of human innovation, the countless ways people in many industries are working to slow and potentially reverse the enormous harms humans have done to the planet.

      A magnet for startups, branding consultants, sustainability officers, scientists, policy wonks and assorted advocates, it’s a place to network, forge partnerships, see and be seen, and find solace with like-minded folks, albeit ones who can afford to journey to and stay in the country’s most expensive city.

      1. mad.casual   2 years ago (edited)

        It’s like history ended, time bounced off of it and we’re living through a New York World’s Fair (’39 or ’64 take your pick) backwards. Take a dip in the fabulous East River! Enjoy a tasty sustainable ice cream! Come see the city of Yesterday powered by the technology of 100 yrs. ago! See the unbelievable spectacle of women wearing pants and, even more unbelievably, men wearing women’s clothing!

        With a reality like this, who needs bong hits to get through a DeSantis quote?

        1. Zeb   2 years ago

          Definitely need bong hits to get through reality like this.

      2. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

        ones who can afford to journey to and stay in the country’s most expensive city.

        Did they fly there in jets and use air conditioning while in the hotel? I bet they did.

        1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

          dude:

          , it’s a place to network, forge partnerships, see and be seen

          They've literally turned "climate action" into a high-end party for the rich, and they're not even trying to hide it.

          1. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

            The current elites seem to try and mimic the elites in the hunger games capital city as much as possible.

            Partially because commies always tend to behave in the same dystopian way, and partially because the hunger games is the highest bar these cultists can clear from a literary perspective while following along.

        2. Zeb   2 years ago

          They are completely unserious. It's just the fashionable thing to do.

      3. soldiermedic76   2 years ago

        decarvonizing agriculture... so doing exactly what American agriculture has been doing since the green revolution before the idiot environmentalists starting pushing stupidity like organic, anti-GMO, vegan bullshit?
        Deforestation free ranching? Exactly like US ranchers have been doing ever since we annexed Texas and settled the Great Plains and the Southwest? In fact, US cattle ranchers have actually helped reforest large parts of the country during the latter 20th, into the 21st century. Until the watermelons decided that cattle grazing BLM and USFS land was bad mmmkay.

    2. mad.casual   2 years ago

      This was in addition to two sold out Earth-focused drag shows, “SAVE HER!” hosted by the eco-drag queen Pattie Gonia, and the spectacle of Prince William wading into New York’s East River to visit the Billion Oyster Project

      Wait. So did Prince William wade into the East River in a dress or was one of the chicks with him really a dude?

  41. Dillinger   2 years ago

    >>$325 million air-defense package for Ukraine

    "no hackable F-35s please. thanks." ~~ Voldomyr

  42. Super Scary   2 years ago

    "Nightmare blunt rotation!"

    Oh cool, maybe they are going to talk about weed a bit more after all those articles about psychedelics. Let's follow the link!

    "On August 29, Spotify surprise-announced the launch of Strike Force Five, a new podcast collaboration between the late-night hosts Seth Meyers, Stephen Colbert, John Oliver, and the Jimmies (Kimmel and Fallon)."

    I just threw up in my mouth a little.

    1. mad.casual   2 years ago

      Wait, the Verizon sales guy hosted a late-night show?

      1. Dillinger   2 years ago

        tell me you saw how Hollywood is pimping itself out to help cover expenses ... Adam Scott walks your dog for $2Gs and so forth

        1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

          Funny stuff.

    2. Fats of Fury   2 years ago (edited)

      They're gonna top Toobin in the jerk off prize.

    3. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

      More like, thanks for the warning, I'll remember to do something else at that time.

  43. Dillinger   2 years ago

    >>Kamala Harris ... Office of Gun Violence Prevention

    let's get the one human most likely to shoot herself in the face to lead.

    1. mad.casual   2 years ago

      When you put it that way, yeah, it sounds bad. But when you put it "The highest ranking politician likely to take a shot to the face." or "The highest ranking politician likely to have someone unload on her face." the position doesn't sound like anything she can't swallow.

      1. Dillinger   2 years ago

        >>highest ranking politician likely to have someone unload on her face

        first thought was "I think Boebert gives her a run" but I see the disqualifier

        1. Cyto   2 years ago

          Meh.... one of them is a decade or 2 past her sell by date.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

            Kamala Harris was past her expiry date the minute she got put on the sale shelf.

  44. Dillinger   2 years ago

    >>No Curtis Mayfield

    means your list is incomplete.

  45. Minadin   2 years ago

    So, NJ Senator Bob Menendez was just indicted on charges of bribery for taking cash, gold bars, a luxury car, and an apartment.

    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/sen-bob-menendez-indicted-gifts-gold-bars-car/story?id=103407936

    1. Minadin   2 years ago

      And, he's chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, and the bribes were just some gifts from a couple of foreign businessmen. Maybe a no-show job here or there.

      Probably no big deal.

      1. Dillinger   2 years ago

        nice to see they're finally trying. Bob should have been in prison for decades already

        1. Cyto   2 years ago

          Translation:

          someone forgot the 10% for the big guy.

          1. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

            either the right people weren't paid off, or an insurmountable amount of evidence leaked out such that it could no longer be plausibly denied by friendly propaganda sources.

            1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

              Reminds me of Dan Rostenkowski (D-Chicago). Rosty was a powerful Representative in the House for many years. Always wondered who he pissed off to have Eric Holder (yes, that Eric Holder) go after him for misuse of the House Post Office.

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Post_Office_scandal

            2. Dillinger   2 years ago

              talk about the Lufthansa job, wind up in a freezer truck.

    2. Fats of Fury   2 years ago

      Let me tell you about Menendez the Moocher
      He was a low down hoochie coocher.

  46. Dillinger   2 years ago

    >>Her crime? Eating pork rinds

    pig's a filthy animal.

    1. Cyto   2 years ago

      A pig is a magical animal, made of bacon, ham and pork.

      -Homer Simpson

  47. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 years ago

    Fuck you, Tony Kinnett, you elitist fuck. There is nothing wrong with looking like a HVAC tech. Maybe if the cunts in DC actually worked for living, they'd understand that.

    1. Minadin   2 years ago

      Maybe the people working on A/C's in his neighborhood are just illegally removing the copper.

    2. mad.casual   2 years ago

      I don't much know, nor really care, who Tony Kinnett is, but maybe he means, "Why did Fetterman show up to Congress looking like someone who shows up only when there is a problem, accurately diagnoses the problem, performs the work to fix the problem at the quoted price, and then goes away?"

  48. Dillinger   2 years ago

    >>the story of a black man who Amazon accused of making racist remarks in private

    I think they're allowed to use the word.

    1. mad.casual   2 years ago (edited)

      Amazonians? Amazons?

      1. Dillinger   2 years ago

        lol death by snu snu.

        1. Eeyore   2 years ago

          "Oh thank you, Lord in heaven."

    2. Cyto   2 years ago

      And it wasn't in private. It was to an amazon employee on the man's front porch via his ring doorbell.

      And it didn't happen.

      1. Dillinger   2 years ago

        interesting. how far past the front door can sound waves emit and still remain private? is Ring a responsible third party?

        1. Eeyore   2 years ago

          Anyone still giving money to companies like Ring are idiots.

  49. TangoDelta   2 years ago

    "... we need as a City to pound in every way possible the message to visitors: get out and never look back, it's not too late to save yourselves!"

    Fixed.

  50. Roberta   2 years ago

    Inside China's disturbing war on drugs.

    Comment?

  51. damikesc   2 years ago

    I'm surprised the DoD decision that a shutdown will NOT impact monies sent to Ukraine for stuff like training (our OWN soldiers will be out of luck, but Ukraine? No problems there) did not get mentioned.

    https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/21/politics/ukraine-training-support-pentagon-shutdown/index.html

  52. NOYB2   2 years ago

    Zelenskyy represents Biden foreign policy perfectly, and Fetterman represents the kind of respect we should pay the Senate perfectly.

    Altogether, a good week.

  53. CE   2 years ago

    I missed the part where Ukraine joined NATO, and we are obligated to help defend them. Isn't the US 33 trillion in debt? Isn't the security of Europe best served by negotiating an end to this war?

  54. kfs   2 years ago

    NATO is a cold war relic. NATO's mission on was to prevent an attack on western Europe by the Soviet Union, it accomplished this task on December 25, 1991, with the dissolution of the USSR. There should have been no exchanging Russian imperialism for Soviet communism. A new treaty should have been negotiated or NATO should have been dissolved. The Iron Law of Oligarchy states: That an organizations continued existence is paramount to its mission.

  55. JacquelineTaylor   2 years ago (edited)

    I’ve earned $17,910 this month by working online from home. I work only six hours a day despite being a full-time college student. Everyone is capable of carrying out this work from their homes and learning it in spare time on a continuous basis.
    To learn more, see this article———>>> https://workscoin1.pages.dev/

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Trump's Tariffs and Immigration Policies Could Make Housing Even More Expensive

M. Nolan Gray | From the July 2025 issue

Photo: Dire Wolf De-extinction

Ronald Bailey | From the July 2025 issue

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!