He Caught a Burglar in the Act. But When Police Came, He Says They Tased Him Instead of the Intruder.
Damien Smith claims in a new lawsuit that police racially profiled him and violated his First, Fourth, and 14th Amendment rights.

Damien Smith says he came home one night in October 2021 to find an intruder burglarizing his house. When the police arrived, they tased him instead of the intruder. Smith, who is black, has now filed a lawsuit against the officers, claiming that they racially profiled him and violated his civil rights.
The officers "racially profiled Mr. Smith, and acted pursuant to LAPD policies and practices that allow and encourage officers to over-react to black people, whom they wrongly assume to be criminals," the 24-page suit argues.
Smith is an actor and filmmaker known for his appearances in The Purge and Snowfall. Smith had even been working on a documentary about police brutality when he had his own police encounter on October 13, 2021. According to the suit, when he entered his house around 12:30 a.m., he caught an intruder in the process of burglarizing his home. The intruder remained in the apartment while Smith called 911.
LAPD officers arrived around 1:30 a.m. and entered through the back door of Smith's apartment. According to the lawsuit, police "unholstered their taser guns, pointed them toward Mr. Smith, and screamed at Mr. Smith: 'Get on the ground!'" Smith protested saying, "I live here, I called 911!" LAPD officers subsequently tased Smith, striking him in the chest and back. According to a Los Angeles Times interview with Smith, when police tased him, the intruder used the opportunity to escape.
Several LAPD officers then handcuffed Smith and walked him out to a patrol car. Outside, a small crowd of Smith's neighbors had gathered, and several told the officers that they "had arrested the wrong person" and that Smith "lived there." Still, the officers placed Smith in the patrol car and closed the door.
"The physical pain, emotional distress and embarrassment that Mr. Smith endured at the hands of Defendant Doe Officer Guillen and other Defendant Doe LAPD officers remains to this day," the complaint states. "This incident and injury occurred only because Defendant Doe Officer Guillen and other individual and Doe defendant LAPD officers…failed to carefully and thoroughly investigate the facts leading to Mr. Smith's 911 call."
The lawsuit alleges that the officers' actions violated Smith's First, Fourth, and 14th Amendment rights and asks for damages to cover medical expenses and attorney's fees, as well as special damages for the emotional suffering the ordeal inflicted on Smith.
"I believe there was a racial component to this whole situation, how the police treated me, how everything was executed," Smith told the Los Angeles Times. "I don't think it would have went down in this manner if I was not African American."
While Smith's tasing and arrest are outrageous, it's unclear whether his lawsuit will succeed. Police officers are protected by expansive qualified immunity, which makes holding police accountable for civil rights violations an uphill battle.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Am guessing that LA/Cali does not have a castle doctrine that allows a homeowner finding an unwanted person such as a burglar in their residence to use appropriate force.
Actually, California does follow the Castle Doctrine.
CA Penal Code 198.5 reads "Any person using force intended or likely to cause death or great bodily injury within his or her residence shall be presumed to have held a reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great bodily injury to self, family, or a member of the household when that force is used against another person, not a member of the family or household, who unlawfully and forcibly enters or has unlawfully and forcibly entered the residence and the person using the force knew or had reason to believe that an unlawful and forcible entry occurred. As used in this section, great bodily injury means a significant or substantial physical injury."
In other words, CA says you have a legal presumption that you reasonably feared imminent death or great bodily harm to yourself or a family member if an intruder forcibly enters or tries to enter your home. There are some exceptions such as if the person trying to break in is also a member of the household but those exceptions don't apply to the case above.
Thanks for the detail. My assumption was incorrect.
Now only if Cali/LA becomes a constitutional carry state where someone returning home encountering a home invader would already have the legal right to be armed as they entered.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,000 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
Do we know the entry was done "forcibly"?
Unless he leaves his LA apartment door unlocked it was. Which seems unlikely.
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning sixteen thousand US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome7.com
As explained to me by LE: Was something damaged to effect the entrance. Was the window screen cut. (just entry through an open window is not sufficient.
"CA Penal Code 198.5 reads..."
Yep, and although not specifically mentioned in the code (last time I checked), the judicial record indicates that these basics (use of force in self defense of one's self, or others) applies outside the home as well.
yet if you actually shoot someone, or shoot and kill someone defending your life the state will charge you, and also charge you with some gun violation, and you will sit in jail until the court and jury “figures out what happened”.
California seems to favor criminals rights over homeowners rights.
You might think a black man knows better than to call the cops.
Maybe he does know the cops and that is why he called, expecting to be attacked, to sue, and get a big settlement. Great planning!
Well he just happened to be writing a movie about police brutality at the time, so there's that.
Talk about luck! He's subjected to police brutality...while working on a documentary about police brutality!
https://twitter.com/AdamCrigler/status/1681929217250844675?t=YiqN4swZXoiVmMTevBlvKg&s=19
So he killed himself with drugs and they charged Chauvin with murder?
[Link]
Outside, a small crowd of Smith's neighbors had gathered, and several told the officers that they "had arrested the wrong person" and that Smith "lived there." Still, the officers placed Smith in the patrol car and closed the door.
Of course they did. They can't admit to being wrong. They're cops.
What color was the burglar? Could the cops have been following the D.A.'s policies?
It happened to Dave Chappelle.
He's lucky to be alive.
Let's get this straight, the guy gets home at 12:30, finds a burglar, calls 911.
And the burglar just hangs out for an hour until the cops arrive at 1:30? Did the guy have a gun on the burglar? Don't cops shoot black guys with guns?
Then the burglar escapes? If the cops thought the burglar was the resident, didn't they find it odd he ran away from his own home?
I call shenanigans.
I call shenanigans.
Yeah, we’re definitely getting the attorney’s spin.
I call shenanigans on this paragraph:
The officers “racially profiled Mr. Smith, and acted pursuant to LAPD policies and practices that allow and encourage officers to over-react to black people, whom they wrongly assume to be criminals,” the 24-page suit argues.
I’m not entirely sure how you would write the policy to encourage people to overreact to someone they wrongly identify, let alone convict someone on it, but it sounds like a Monty Python sketch.
As far as the actual description of what happened, the loose shitty narrative doesn’t quite set it on the shelf next to Jussie Smollett but does put it pretty solidly in Paul Pelosi territory.
I’m not entirely sure how you would write the policy to encourage people to overreact to someone they wrongly identify, let alone convict someone on it, but it sounds like a Monty Python sketch.
Maybe more like a Futurama sketch.
Of course it's covered by QI - because in all apparently similar cases, the cops entered through the front door, which makes it an entirely different situation.
I am a HUGE critic of the police and their policies and procedures, but in this instance they actually did not act inappropriately. It had nothing to do with the man's race. When you enter a situation with potential hostile actors in the building, EVERYBODY is ordered to the ground until the building is cleared, THEN they work out who is who and what is going on. The home invader can easily say "I'm the home owner, I called you" while he's pulling his gun to shoot up the place. (Likewise, the innocent homeowner can explain the situation while complying and lying on the ground to demonstrate that he is not a threat.) They have to secure the premises before they can listen to your protests.
This is the situation that is caused by all of these bad cops using excessive force. It puts everybody in danger. Now people see racial-profiling everywhere and refuse to comply with reasonable commands that are intended to protect everybody there. All because the bad actors in law enforcement have so undermined the credibility of law enforcement officers. It puts us all in danger.
We will see when the police release their statement after getting their stories straight, if they perceived that the man they tased had made ‘furtive movements’ and therefore had to be out down. The ‘it’s coming right for us’ defense.
We will also see what happened from the police body cam videos (LOL) unless they don’t exists or were ‘misplaced’.
or the cameras failed (where shut off) at the critical moment!
That argument may have won in the days before body cams. Now that they're ubiquitous we see the truth. No one has been hurt by body cams more than the "I didn't even do nuffin" crowd. Seriously, cite more than a single example in the last decade when the body cam in a critical incident were "misplaced."
Correct. If you read other news stories it says the homeowner grabbed a hunting knife which he then used on the burglar. So police arrive and see a man with a knife standing over another man who's bleeding. It seems perfectly reasonable to detain the one who is the biggest threat until you can figure out what is going on. And of course, I'm sure that in the midst of writing a documentary on police brutality he was FULLY compliant and gave them absolutely NO reason to taze that chip off his shoulder. Of course this will all be cleared up when the body cam is released and we see that he conducted himself in exactly the manner we expect he did and police followed procedure like they do in 95% of the cases.
The version I read said he wasn't holding anything when the police came in thru the back. He said " I live here, I called you." or something but was tased. My question to everybody is do you think the police gave a crap about what he said ? Or do you think that they decided he didn't immediately comply immediately enough for them to think it was immediately and tased him because a cop can't be bothered to take 2 seconds to listen to somebody before considering them non-compliant taser bait ?
This is the situation that is caused by all of these bad cops using excessive force.
Go fuck yourself.That's an awful big and irrelevant tangent to leap to in contradiction to your own point. One might infer that you don't give two shits about the first paragraph and were using it as a stalking horse.Plainly and simply and by your own premises: This is the situation that is cause by all of these criminal home invaders. Then, once *they've* caused a home invasion or other crime necessitating police at all, by your own assertions, this is the situation that is caused by belligerent homeowners and race-baiting hucksters doing shit that seems shady or portraying perfectly normal activities and procedures, even ones created, put in place, and enforced of, for, and by black people, as racist. Then *maybe* this situation is caused by bad cops using excessive force *at the scene*.
To whimsically ascribe the police action in this case, especially contravening your prior narrative, to some other unnamed or unidentified case or cases without evidence is pretty close to, if not directly saying, "These (black) officers were violent because they've seen other (black) officers be violent and it's become a learned behavior or a general expectation that (black) officers are just generally more violent than the average population."
So, why did the police allow the intruder to escape? Doesn't appear they secured the premises.
Good comment.
For sound economic perspective go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
So let me get this straight. He calls 911 reports an intruder. The police respond and tell him to get on the ground and he doesn't. The police are trying to gain control of the situation. This is normal procedure. Once they have the scene and the people there secured, then there is time to safely verify who is who. Then throw in that the resident is Black and is making a film about "police brutality" I have to question the entire situation.
That addresses some of it - but why didn't they treat the burglar the same way they treated the owner? Why was the owner arrested and placed in a police car?
"He Caught a Burglar in the Act. But When Police Came, He Says They Tased Him Instead of the Intruder."
Equity.
Don't make us call The Handicapper General. You won't like it when we call The Handicapper General.
I drove a NYC bus . One night one of my passengers was attacked by another person with a box cutter . I was able to flag down a police car and they boarded through the back door. The police separated them and put one in hand cuffs. I pointed out the man they had cuffed was the person attacked. They took the cuffs off and ruffed up the other guy then cuffed him . They both were black . I had to file a report .When getting the information from the officer he mentioned how common that they cuff the wrong person because they have to act and they don’t know who did what . Your article don’t mention the race of the assailant . This could be racism or maybe the police thought they were doing what needed to be done . I would have accepted an apology from the officers and moved on .
"I would have accepted an apology from the officers and moved on ."
What sort of world would we have if people acted this way?
When police arrive they often have no way to tell the good guy from the bad guy. Should the police believe everyone who says "I am the good guy"? Of course not! Therefore the police will likely cuff everyone, then try to determine who is the good guy. In this case it appears that refusing to follow police orders resulted in the bad guy getting away.