Why Is So Much of Reddit Dark Right Now?
When your business relies on volunteer moderators and user-generated content, angry denizens can threaten the whole enterprise.

If you inhabit a certain corner of the internet, populated by nerds and developers and music obsessives and shitposters (sometimes one and the same), you may have noticed some changes. Roughly 30 percent of Reddit is currently dark, with more than 2,000 subreddits—the individual community forums housed on the site, which are moderated by volunteers—involved in an ongoing protest of Reddit's decision to charge third-party app developers for access to the company's backend.
Though the protest was originally planned for June 12–14, many subreddits have extended their strike, as the initial coordinated action yielded no sign of reversal from CEO Steve Huffman. Thus, Reddit's saga is a case study in the perils of relying on user-generated content and volunteer moderators as a business model—and the extraordinary power of this decentralized model to push back on unpopular decisions made by the C-suite.
To understand Reddit's predicament, you must first understand its format: Users, who can have accounts for free, post content on individual subreddits, which are served by volunteer moderators who decide the rules for their specific community. This outsourced, decentralized content moderation format means mods are doing free work for the company and have a fair amount of power to protest higher-level decisions they dislike. It also frees the site from having to employ moderators.
The Washington Post's Megan McArdle writes:
You can imagine Reddit's business model as a kind of giant digital Goodwill store. Citizens with surplus time, ideas or complaints about the state of the world periodically stop by to donate things. At Reddit, volunteers sort through them, toss out the stuff that's truly gross and put the rest on display for customers to browse. If all goes well, this activity generates funds — Goodwill literally sells the goods, while Reddit sells advertising, subscriptions and virtual goods — enough to cover operating costs and then some.
The conventional wisdom has long been that if you're not paying for the use of a social media site, you are the product—meaning your data. In this case, Reddit isn't looking to start charging users, but it is looking to monetize their data, charging for application programming interface (API) access, which affects the third-party apps that many Redditors use to moderate, post, and read. As a result, many developers of third-party clients have said the API pricing is untenable, and that their products will no longer serve users. Huffman, meanwhile, says he will "continue to be profit-driven until profits arrive" (and plans to go public this year).
Interestingly, Reddit first "framed the decision as a response to generative AI companies that scrape its content to build their lucrative large language models while paying Reddit nothing in return," per Vox's Sara Morrison, so this may be yet another example of artificial intelligence (A.I.) altering the digital landscape—and/or companies preparing for the inevitable, and/or companies using A.I. as cover to make decisions they already wanted to pursue.
"The protestors are correct that Reddit is killing businesses that were built on its platform, and Reddit is also correct that these businesses were weakening its ability to monetize, which could eventually threaten the product itself," writes Byrne Hobart at The Diff.
Another factor at play here is the fact that venture capital funding—which Reddit long benefited from—has dried up. Reddit, like many other platforms, is concerned now more than ever with profitability. But it may have a very tough road ahead of it given the unconventional, decentralized model at its core. "The big downside to having a consumer brand is that the product ends up being one that everyone has an opinion on; the downside to outsourcing important work to unpaid moderators is that they have opinions about what direction the site goes in and what decisions the business behind it makes," notes Hobart.
For now, the standoff shows no signs of letting up, but inventive Redditors have found a new way to protest: Moderators are marking their (nonpornographic) subreddits "NSFW," or "not safe for work," to disallow ads and cut off revenue in an effort to get the company to listen to their demands.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Those darn Christian NationLists/ Common Good Conservatives ruin everything
Easily start receiving more than $600 every single day from home in your part time. i made $18781 from this job in my spare time afte my college. easy to do job and its regular income are awesome. no skills needed to do this job all you need to know is how to copy and paste stuff online. join this today by follow details on this page.
.
.
Apply Now Here—————————->>> https://Www.Coins71.Com
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do.....
For more detail visit the given link..........>>> http://Www.SalaryApp1.com
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM
All ten of them. They have the power of the sky father or something, one supposes. What do you (open to all) think the next trumped up media-hyped group to be scared about will be? White nationalists are always the fallback, all the way to the 1980s. Satanists are out of favor, because they're so edgy & cool, and are actually atheists and transgender activists it seems. Muslims not allowing flags likely a flash in the pan, but good for a clown nose/complete lack of self awareness chuckle. TERFs, damned women not wanting to see cocks in the ladies showers, the worst kind of bigotry. And the girls and women objecting to transwomen's clear physical superiority, clear indicator that they are terrible people. Looking at that, it's likely to be some flavor of straight white conservative men who can be misrepresented as supremacist/nationalist/incel, innit? Because, patriarchy.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,300 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,300 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link————————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
Maybe because they're busy banning each other?
https://twitter.com/reddit_lies/status/1671268246383894528?cxt=HHwWgIDR4bDnxLEuAAAA
BREAKING NEWS!
r/MarchAgainstNazis is giving everyone the ability to moderate each other.
(yes, that includes you)
This is AWESOME. It will make a glorious mess, but it's Reddit so it never mattered in the first place.
Six months ago I lost my job and after that I was fortunate enough to stumble upon a great website which literally saved me. I started working for them online and in a short time after I've started averaging 15k a month... The best thing was that cause I am not that computer savvy all I needed was some basic typing skills and internet access to start.
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)>>> https://www.Salarybiz.com
If you inhabit a certain corner of the internet, populated by nerds and developers and music obsessives and shitposters (sometimes one and the same), you may have noticed some changes.
Reason comments?
Roughly 30 percent of Reddit...
Oh.
All it is really doing is showing just how inept Reddit leadership is.
They have free labor (unpaid mods) and free content (unpaid people freely adding videos, etc.) yet still can't turn a profit. Literally all they have to do is put out a product worth half a shit (ie. a halfway decent mobile app and a decent and not computer slowing pos website) and they'd be fine. But they can't even do that.
All the whining about moderators and API access is a cover for their ineptitude.
They have free labor (unpaid mods) and free content (unpaid people freely adding videos, etc.) yet still can’t turn a profit.
I have been asking almost since Reddit's inception, why an internet BBS needs a CEO. It appears Reddit is starting to ask that question internally.
Non-profit status seems like a really good fit for Reddit.
The good news is, for the reasons you give, someone could come along and replace them.
A better business model would be an online community that is organized like a mutual/cooperative. For the channels. With Reddit being more like a franchisor.
That would fit into the Fediverse (the federated, open network Mastodon is built on).
...but people USE Reddit. Nobody touches Mastadon outside of pedos.
Wait, what? I thought ENB here said everyone was going to Mastadon after the twitters turned into a racist hellscape under Musk. They even had a guide to how to get on mastadon.
I'm pretty sure it was supposed to be the utopia to replace that one lost when Elon required you to pay for a blue check mark.
The tools would. But like all open-source stuff, there’s a tendency to throw it all against the wall and pray that someone else figures out how to make it work together. Which doesn’t happen so it looks like the fediverse. Most people who are social and could attract a community need something like a franchise manual to follow for the tech/revenue stuff.
Part of the issue is they also give the content away for free. Speaking as a sysadmin, servers and bandwidth are expensive. They have to keep the foo counters turning somehow.
Most old BBSes were run as an act of love by the sysop, but they typically didn't scale very well.
Of course, directly charging the users at this point would inspire an even bigger rebellion. Not sure how they're going to dig out of this one.
I think the internet is going to end up in a last man standing gets to charge situation. Ad rates are through the floor and venture capital is drying up. So a lot of the things that allowed free websites to thrive are going away.
No. The problem is that Reddit has no knowledge or inclination of how to reward those who are producing/moderating the content. As if the CEO is a slaveowner, the content is HIS property, and the slaves are expected to work for free.
In a way its about how to make a profit - but longer term its about staying in business. Reddit is really lucky actually. There is no easy way for those mods/producers to change platforms in a way that they can be paid or otherwise incentivized to keep doing what they do. So they are simply 'going dark' - until the lack of an alternative drives them crazy and they feel compelled to produce something for free. But those mods/producers are always going to be looking elsewhere that is more valuable for them - and the content they produce under unpaid conditions is always going to be crappier than content paid.
There are so many ways that these social media companies could make money by changing their business model from platform to tool. But VC's wouldn't be able to find a hypeable collect-all-eyeballs-and-IPO/exit strategy that makes them money. And VC's are the ones who control the business models.
The worst part of all is that it's not Reddit that suffers from this crap, it's the communities that are being squashed by the moderates throwing a fit. Reddit's API changes are a shit idea, but if they really want to drive traffic to the official Reddit app, they should make the official app better than the free ones. The official app is a giant black hole of broken dreams and failure. It's unusable and shit. I would rather just not use Reddit at all than use the official app.
"a giant black hole of broken dreams and failure"
That is their user base
Not crying over mods that have feifdoms and push curated and biased allowed discussions. I'm laughing at the entire thing.
Ok, people keep saying this and I don't get it. I understand not wanting to be pushed into using the official app, but I don't understand why people claim to hate it. It works fine for me. I have both read several hundred hours worth of content on my phone with it, and likewise posted several dozen chapters of a story with it from my phone as well.
Everyone keeps saying "it's broken and sucks!" but no one can ever explain how to me.
Okay, the last time I remember using it years ago it was painfully slow, as in posts could take 1-2 seconds to open, not helped by the fact that you would be treated to ads that cover 40% of the screen or more and autoplay videos. Text wasn't comfortable to look at and clicking on things was haphazard as the UI shifted them around constantly to make room for another ad. It's literally impossible to imagine a worse UI design.
Ok. I can grant the "slow to load" part, although to me it feels like more of a connectivity issue. But other than occasional ads that appear inline like other stories on the feed do, I cannot recall ever having seen an ad anywhere else in the interface. I dunno, maybe it used to be significantly different? I've only been using Reddit for about 4 years now, so possibly our experiences don't overlap?
I don't understand why people are so gung ho about apps.
I use the mobile site with an adblocker. I moderate a large, but low traffic forum. All I do is delete spam and harassing posts.
Other mods seem hellbent on reviewing every stupid comment that gets posted. That's what voting is for.
What's most amusing is that you'll see 6 people post a complaint as a comment, while NONE of them will bother to click a formal "report" link.
People want something to complain about.
God save the queen, man.
Most of the mods are mentally ill trannies, so throwing a fit comes with the territory.
the downside to outsourcing important work to unpaid moderators is that they have opinions about what direction the site goes in and what decisions the business behind it makes," notes Hobart.
Yeah, "unpaid moderators" who almost universally suffer from "Internet Moderator Syndrome" which, in the pre-internet era I called "Hall Monitor Syndrome".
Or even worse, HOA President Syndrome
The Stanford prison experiment was bullshit, but I think the reddit moderators prove the thesis all the same
The Stanford prison experiment may have been bullshit, but the Reddit Prison Experiment is very, very real.
I got the account I had for a long time banned on reddit by the mods of a sub that in general is a pretty mainstream area, but like all of reddit is infested with left-wing hall monitors as mods.
A comment was flagged as "bigotry", and I was instantly perma-banned from the sub. I replied that even the worst interpretation would just be criticism, but even the comment itself had a "but to each his own, its a free country" sentiment since it was in regard to able bodied consenting adults. When pointing this out to the mod that banned me, he/she responded with "well it could theoretically be interpreted as bigorty, maybe choose your words wiser next time, bye".
Using a different account who's email was apparently linked to the original one (damn you, google) got me perma-banned from reddit as a whole, of which I got no reply at all, even though the original ban was clearly an activist censoring any speech that is even remotely critical, rather than actual "bigotry".
Ill never have sympathy for any of them, they are the lowest dregs of society, and a massive waste of life. "Unpaid" is more than they are worth. And in the end, getting to be the little speech censoring, left wing hacks, controlling their little kingdoms is what they want anyways. Which is why they keep doing it, unpaid, and always will. There will always be those who sign up to be hall monitors, and everyone should be skeptical of them.
Similar thing here. I was banned from /r/solotravel by responding to a gay post asking about traveling in an anti-gay country. I said not to act gay, advice which was deemed too bigotted to stand.
As for the app, I use it when away from home, but normally I access with desktop and ad blocker.
The Reddit for my city "went dark" pretty much the same day as a collapse of a section of the interstate. Needless to say, when it got back a lot of users couldn't give a shit about this API stuff and were mad they couldn't use the page to get information on the incident.
It should also be noted that a lot of moderators are primarily upset that these upcoming changes will make it hard to use their third-party apps to automatically ban users for trivial things like posting in a no-no subreddit.
Lots of business lessons found in this situation on what not to do. The issue Reddit has is that it thinks too highly about itself and forgot the lessons from digg and other websites like them. C-suite decisions are just hastening the rise of whatever company will replace Reddit in 5-10 years.
Reddit is a a hive of leftist scum.
There are some gun subreddits and r/Republican, everything else is complete hate for conservatives
Yes which is why the mods are losing their minds over the fact the CEO is considering implementing a vote system to remove the moderators who forced everyone into the boycott when they disagreed with it. Mods use their “power” to ban and censor anyone who disagrees. I am banned from 15+ subreddits for simply belonging to covid skepticism subreddits those mods disagreed with, and I never even tried to join or participate on their subreddits. They use bots to ban you automatically when you make a comment or if you are a member of a sub they dislike. The mods think they are far more important than they are and it’s honestly hilarious they think reddit cares what they want or think.
What happened to “private companies can do what they want”? I guess that doesn’t apply to them in their minds.
Vote system is just going to get trolled. Raids will become common unless there is some safety measure put in place.
Nothing at all?
This amounts to a dispute between a private company and it's volunteer workforce. It can either accommodate the volunteers, or it can continue it's own way and lose volunteers.
Neither course of action says a thing about "private companies can do what they want".
It's a hive of autistic males who live with their mothers.
same thing?
Huh, so the good news, as I'm hearing it is, the crew of the OceanGate didn't die slowly asphyxiating in the cold, dark depths.
That's the rumor. And makes the most sense, what with specs designed only for half the depths they were going to.
Then there's the AP's take on it all...
https://twitter.com/AP/status/1671602671998861313?t=gIlHaCq3WpwJO_0z6UPz0w&s=19
The search for a submersible that disappeared while taking wealthy tourists to see the wreck of the Titanic has transfixed parts of the world. That contrasts sharply with another recent tragedy in which the victims were migrants motivated by desperation.
never let a good crisis go to waste, and if we can jam in open borders, damnit, we have to do it
And it's gone.
https://twitter.com/nicksortor/status/1671957336657633281?t=_aqHw8LztyM-535lJ4oshA&s=19
COAST GUARD UPDATE: The Titan sub’s tailcone was discovered 1,600 feet from the Titanic on the sea floor.
Debris found is consistent with the “catastrophic loss of the pressure chamber.”
Upon making that discovery, the Coast Guard immediately notified family members their loved ones had been lost.
There are definitely worse ways to go than instant death from an implosion.
Yeah, there were reports last night of a 'knocking sound every 30 minutes'. However, my first thought was, "the ocean is a noisy place, they heard 'knocking sounds' when searching for Malaysia 370".
I'm also learning that those submersibles have a limited lifespan. Each time they go to depth, their 'max depth' is effectively reduced. No info as to whether Ocean Gate was considering this after each successive dive.
From what I've read they didn't consider very much, so I doubt they considered that.
Makes sense, metal fatigue happens in things like airplane skins from the pressure differential changes.
There is a lawsuit against them by an ex empire engineer fired for them skipping destructive testing. The CEO also thinks the industry was over regulated.
"used to think"
😉
No info as to whether Ocean Gate was considering this after each successive dive.
Based on some of things I've heard about what a shit show their design and engineering for that thing was, I'm thinking probably not.
The pictures from that sub are dumbfounding to me. I am usually the last person to judge how others spend their money, unless it is to buy force or agitate for government action. But then I looked at the photos of people inside that submersible.
https://www.insider.com/titan-missing-submersible-photos-interior-exterior-dock-launch-2023-6#crew-members-are-sealed-inside-the-vessel-with-at-least-17-deadbolts-in-addition-to-the-view-from-the-viewport-crew-members-can-use-monitors-and-tablets-to-survey-their-surroundings-5
How could ostensibly smart and successful people have thought that was a good idea? You climb into a sewer pipe with a single 8 inch window, and sit cross-legged on the floor like some kindergartener in his crazy dad’s improvised bomb shelter? It has a fit and finish on par with a rocket my kids fashioned out of an old refrigerator box at age 8.
I think that every fabulously rich person ought to commission a case study on this episode for their own good. Billionaires I’ve read about are not idiots. And people don’t generally accumulate and hold that much money if they are easily duped by con men. But somehow the charlatan running the Titan project managed to get past these rich peoples’ bullshit filters and convince not only these successful people to climb into a tiny, sketchy coffin, but to bring their children too.
Unbelievable.
And people don’t generally accumulate and hold that much money if they are easily duped by con men.
They don't get rich by being duped, but from what I've heard once people acquire a certain amount of wealth they will buy things simply because they're expensive. "Quarter of a million dollars for one ride? Count me in!"
Perhaps...though the founder of my old company still drove around in the hatchback he had slept in when starting the company, and wore rather crappy clothes.
While I agree with you that the $250k is insignificant to them, my point was that they should have known better- irrespective of the price. That carbon-fiber tube looked sketchy. No seats or harnesses, just criss-cross-apple-sauce on the floor? You can't even see what is going on outside, except for a tiny little window...Most of the visibility was from small tv's displaying a feed from cameras outside the hull. Think about that- you are spending $250k to go to the bottom of the ocean and watch video feeds, no different from a person watching on the surface...you have substantially increased your risk for only a tiny change in the experience- that little window. It's just bizarre to me.
I totally understand what you're saying and I agree. My point is that some of these rich guys can be duped into buying expensive garbage simply because it's expensive. In this case the garbage was also deadly.
It's not about the experience. It's about the bragging rights.
And that little window is what killed them all
Nicholas Cage alone is proof that wealthy people will spend their money on really self-indulgent shit just to say they did it. Look at Bezos and Branson and their space travel obsession.
"How could ostensibly smart and successful people have thought that was a good idea? You climb into a sewer pipe with a single 8 inch window, and sit cross-legged on the floor like some kindergartener in his crazy dad’s improvised bomb shelter?"
Was talking with the wife about this last night when we saw the details. Completely agree. Ill pay bezos or musk a few million to have a comfy space ride rather than spending potentially my last hours alive in a sea coffin the way these folks did. Woof
https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/disneys-diversity-chief-latondra-newton-quits-after-pair-box-office-bombs
Yes, we are at that point in the identity politics/DEI cycle where companies - in addition to CEOs, COOs, CIOs, and so on - now have Chief Diversity Officers; and no, that paragon of youthful grooming, Disney, no longer has one. That's because the chief diversity officer and senior vice president of Disney, Latondra Newton, is leaving her role after more than six years, Deadline reported citing an internal memo.
"Coleman wrote that Newton “decided to leave The Walt Disney Company to pursue other endeavors.” Newton plans to join the corporate board of another company and focus on the creative company she owns. It wasn't clear if she would hire Alissa Heinerscheid, best known for single handedly destroying Bud Light and Tranheuser Busch with her Dylan Mulvaney influencer campaign.
Newton had, since 2017, led Disney's diversity and inclusion initiatives, coordinating with various teams to produce entertainment "that reflects a global audience and sustains a welcoming and inclusive workplace for everyone," as per a profile on the company's website."
"Before Disney, Newton was Group Vice President, Social Innovation and Chief Diversity Officer. Toyota Motor North America, Inc. and Chief Program Officer, Toyota Mobility Foundation, Toyota Motor Corporation. She began her career at Toyota in 1991."
So, she's been a useless leech her entire career.
Correct
Speaking tangentially to this, did you see that clip where Spielberg completely snubbed Kennedy on stage, and she stopped clapping and her husband escorted her off stage in a huff?
That was *finger-kiss* magnifique.
did you see that clip where Spielberg completely snubbed Kennedy on stage, and she stopped clapping and her husband escorted her off stage in a huff?
I suspect Spielberg has never liked her. There’s an audio clip out there on the interwebs, although I don’t know for sure if it’s ever been authenticated as real, of Spielberg trashing her. He said, and I’m paraphrasing here, the only thing she was good at was getting coffee and interrupting other people to interject her own bad ideas. Her main job (as his executive assistant going all the way back to Raiders) was to take notes at meetings and she was terrible at even that. And apparently all of her story ideas were complete shit. Which makes sense given the sad state of Star Wars and Indiana Jones under her watch.
Which begs the question, how did she get promoted to such a high position? Given that we’re talking about the entertainment industry, I’m just gonna assume that she must have been quite attractive in her younger years and very good at fucking/ sucking dick. And now, in the poundMeToo era, she knows too much to ever get rid of her.
I suspect Spielberg has never liked her. There’s an audio clip out there on the interwebs, although I don’t know for sure if it’s ever been authenticated as real, of Spielberg trashing her.
That audio clip is real, what I don’t know is what the context was. People tease colleagues all the time, so it might just be friendly professional teasing. In fact, the first time I heard that audio clip, I kind of dismissed it as friendly comradery — given that she steadily rose through the ranks at LucasFilm and was kept on throughout the entire Indiana Jones franchise, but after seeing the event on stage, I’m now questioning that.
And now, in the poundMeToo era, she knows too much to ever get rid of her.
Without speaking to the former, there have been questions about why Bob Iger has kept her. There are rumours that Iger has aspirations for the presidency, and he doesn’t want to be on record as firing one of the top female executives in the industry. However, despite rumours that she’s been “sidelined” at Disney– given meaningless time-filler projects etc., I don’t see much evidence of that given her central role in the new Indiana Jones disaster.
But given what happened on stage at Disney, it seems reasonably clear to me that Spielberg either: Doesn’t think very much of her OR is a colossal asshole who didn’t snub her out of any personal animus, but just never considered her to be worth mentioning.
https://twitter.com/BoundingComics/status/1671662617432150024?t=YaxUTHdQsRzcQtReYC7eXw&s=19
Lucasfilm President Kathleen Kennedy Says “It’s Entirely Possible” For Phoebe Waller-Bridge To Take Over Indiana Jones Franchise
"Which begs the question, how did she get promoted to such a high position?"
A couple things. First she has been floating around big names for a long time, getting their coffee and setting up meetings. She apparently made a couple things happen in terms of logistics for some movies, famously Jurassic park, but its over exaggerated. There is a myth that "Jurassic park wouldn't have happened without her!" and that has been applied to other past films as well in the spirit of "it takes a STRONG WOMAN to get things done in this world" - girlboss shit. Basically she was good at getting the coffees and making sure certain people got where they needed to be on time, and stuck around big directors/producers that were actually making big films.
In the above context, the me2 movement happened, and Disney leaned very hard into the intersectional feminism (among other terrible political cults) and this is what you got. "The Force is Female". Star wars / Lucasfilm with a strong powerful womyn at the helm, going to show the men how to do it. And hell, she's been the one behind the scenes making these all these useless males look good for all these years, so its long past due she get her shot and show everyone what women can do...
Unfortunately for her, the Peter principle seems to be hitting her VERY hard and she was never ready for the big time. So all she can produce is bottom of the barrel intersectionality woke shit that, apparently, no one will pay to see
She was always a glorified office manager/secretary who Spielberg kept around specifically because she was good at keeping the itinerary moving. Spielberg is very much a romantic about movies as art that moves people. That snub, I suspect, is mostly rooted in aggravation that someone he kept on staff for all these years has made a mockery of the industry that he loves.
Unpopular Opinion: I liked the sequel trilogy, well at least Force Awakens and Rise of Skywalker, and didn’t really see Rey as being all that different than Luke as far as their heroes journeys and being Mary/Gary Sue’s.
Ill respectfully disagree for a plethora of reasons. Force awakens was the only of the sequels that was even kind of watchable, and it was just an updated New Hope. It got great numbers because of the brand name and the huge gap in time, but it was still just a new hope for today's generation. TLJ was complete trash, and ROS was literally the first star wars movie I never finished. Fell asleep on the couch 2/3 of the way through it and it was so meh that I never had any desire to finish it. Palpatine being alive, and Rey being a palpatine was ridiculous enough, but the movie was just more milquetoast blah, and these two movies made history by having sequentially less attendance / tickets each time than the previous, unheard of in Star Wars past.
Rey is absolutely a Mary Sue. Luke is not. Rey is near flawless, and without training bested one of the, if not the, top Jedi masters in existence. Luke actually went on the classic heroes journey, and has character flaws, faced struggles, and famously got too big for his britches losing his hand and having to fight his way back. Luke may have been too powerful in some ways (should he really have been able to fly THAT well right away?) but he goes on the classic heroes journey that makes you like a character. Rey showed up at 9.9/10, and never really grew or developed at all, was like watching superman if he didn't have the problem with kryptonite.
Sequels were bad for pretty much 2 reasons. 1, Kathleen Kennedy's "the force is female" was essentially her making it a girlboss, Mary-Sue self insert in Rey, and its bad for the same reason Mary Sue stories are ALWAYS bad. You cant get interested in a character with unlimited power level who faces almost no struggles. 2, It was written by the same modern writers that are writing the other Disney swill, complete with their uninspired, hack directors (Rian Johnson, and Abrams).
She deserves nothing but scorn. Single handedly murdered Star wars, a former money printing machine, and Indy 5 looks like a flop now.
She was handed absolute gold and managed to turn it into a dung pile.
Disney has escalated the DEI, LGBTQ, and gender propaganda significantly since the political awokening in 2016. Every year it gets worse, and they are bleeding subscribers and the movies are flopping harder.
Question is will the pain ever increase to the level they change course. As of right now most of their products are loss-leaders they use to virtue signal. But in the past a disney/pixar movie losing money would be absurdity. Its about to become a normal occurrence.
Hopefully sanity wins, but im not so sure yet.
NBA draft is going on. Had it on for a few minutes. ESPN broadcast crew is JJ Reddick, Jay Bilas, and 2 or 3 black women. The women are annoying as hell, but Disney keeps forcing them onto every NBA show.
They're starting to go through the same brand rejection as Bud Light now. They never should have picked that fight with DeSantis because that, and the dyke who just quit as their DEI commissar, completely fucked their brand by making it a vector for the Rainbow Evangelical Church.
So both sides built ventures on the idea that everything should be free to them. Not caring about spoiled children bickering.
Actually, the API developers are on board with paying (assuming they are telling the truth in all these interviews I'm reading), but reddit's cost structure seems to be prohibitive.
#Winning
https://twitter.com/squatsons/status/1671926337307840513?t=ifYWERJApvtlhAexqAhEDg&s=19
General mobilization announced in Kiev.
In the Obolonsky district of Kiev, the mobilization of citizens liable for military service was announced - even those who did not receive a summons should appear at the local military registration and enlistment office. In the event that the people of Kiev, falling under the mobilization, do not comply with this requirement, they fall under criminal liability.
general mobilization was also announced in the Ivano-Frankivsk region.
To the last Ukrainian.
[Link]
I’ve heard the rumors that it’s mostly ethnic Russians in the east they’ve been snatching off the streets for the Ukrainian army. So I guess shits getting real now.
And why are the Ukrainians launching “counter-offensives” in the first place? All of the attritional math benefits defenders. And spending months telling everyone you’re going to do it?
Obviously, I think we can guess some answers involving politics and MIC $$$. But it sucks donkey dick for the poor chumps sent out across open ground to try and get through 5 layers of Russian defenses.
Yep.
Been using eastern and southern Ukrainians, plus Hungarians from the southwest.
Kiev and Lviv have been mostly untouched outside of volunteers, which is fairly surprising given losses so far.
Obviously, I think we can guess some answers involving politics and MIC $$$.
Speaking of which, I saw yesterday that the pentagon found another "accounting error" similar to the last one that allowed them to send another $3 billion (IIRC) to Ukraine. This time it's $6 billion.
Funny how these "accounting errors" only go one way.
And why are the Ukrainians launching “counter-offensives” in the first place?
Not saying it's a plan that is destined to succeed, but the simplest explanation is they want to drive out the army who invaded their country.
Because the mods on reddit act like dictators. They do not own the subreddits and reddit is considering kicking them off and they are collectively crying and losing their shit because they won’t be able to ban and censor people they disagree with anymore. Good riddance to the dictatorial mods. Most redditors are opposed to the “blackouts” but mods made it seem like everyone was on board.
It's been hilarious reading @reddit_lies on Twitter documenting the mods absolutely losing their shit over this.
My understanding is that Reddit is not currently profitable, or set to become unprofitable because ad rates are plummeting through the floor. So this is a desperate attempt to get users to up API's that are monetizable to keep the lights on.
A.K.A. you can do a black out all you want, but Reddit has to actually pay for the servers you use.
You know what kind of people charge for access to their backend?
Where's Tony been? I haven't seen him in the comments for a while.
For sound economic perspective go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
Hilarious. So many stories from commenters who act likes assholes here complaining about the Reddit forums they were banned from.
I got labeled as a bigot and perma-banned for saying the words "rainbow capitalism".
If you don't have a problem with Reddit's petty tyrants who censor speech to keep the left from hearing any criticism at all, I can tell you that you are on the wrong side of the fight my brother.
Idiot freeloading anti-capitalists on social media being idiots.
If Reddit does not become profitable, there will be no Reddit.
The days of sucking up never-ending piles of almost-free VC money while bleeding red ink on the balance sheet are over as long as interest rates stay above 2%.
They aren’t asking users to pony up, just 3rd-party app sellers (other for-profit businesses)…
It would be hilarious if Reddit treated this like a labor dispute, and locked everyone out… Shut the site down *completely* for a week or two (not 'go private', but 'We are closed' on the front page) & (Because it's not a labor dispute, the freeloaders aren't paid employees, and there can be no NLRB complaint) mass-ban the offending mods….
Raise your hand if you have never been on Reddit and could care less.
Freeloading users are a symptom of the new generation that thinks everything from the internet to college loans should be free just because.
Consistently made over $20,000 in income from home with the benefit of smooth playback and sticky online interest. |F330″ I actually made $18,000 with this perfect home income. Everyone can now without a doubt...
http://Cash.Salary49.com
For users, the visual perception of the product or service that they can receive is important. If you are planning to grow your business, post video reviews on the popular YouTube platform! So that as many users as possible view your videos here https://www.1kviews.com/ buy youtube views. They process the order quickly. When you choose our service, your order goes into action immediately. No waiting, no delays, just a quick start to increasing your YouTube views. This will make you popular among more YouTube users and help you grow your business.
Because they're all over here at 'reason' trying to spell any part of "Atlas Shrugged" and drooling "but muh cannabis"?