Review: Imperfect Victims Documents Women Who Are Prosecuted for Defending Themselves
Author Leigh Goodmark's end goals of abolishing prisons and defunding police are hard to swallow.

Women who suffer years of physical violence finally fight back, and wind up in prison. Rape victims jailed as "material witnesses" to compel their testimony. Teens exploited by violent pimps who themselves get charged with sex trafficking. Imperfect Victims: Criminalized Survivors and the Promise of Abolition Feminism is filled with story after infuriating story of such situations.
The book, from University of Maryland law professor Leigh Goodmark, takes a detailed look at how girls and women come to be arrested, prosecuted, and punished for such actions as defending themselves against violence or refusing to participate in the prosecution of someone who victimized them.
The roots of many such injustices, Goodmark explains, are ironically found in policies pushed by anti-violence advocates meant to help survivors of spousal abuse, sexual violence, and other crimes that disproportionately affect women. These carceral solutions have failed to decrease violence, but they have had "significant consequences for the victims of that violence," writes Goodmark.
Her solution—"abolition feminism"—aims to move "away from a mindset that equates punishment with justice." Ultimately, it would involve abolishing prisons and defunding police. Goodmark's end goals are hard to swallow: Like so many criminal justice abolitionists, her alternatives rely on a mix of vague and utopian visions (we need "a different world entirely," where everyone's needs are met and racism and patriarchy are dismantled) and ignoring the fact that material conditions can't fully account for human passions and prejudices. Nor does she explain how to address ongoing violence from those resistant to restorative justice.
But Goodmark also offers plenty of less radical ideas for action. These include decriminalizing sex work, opposing "new criminal laws that purport to make society safer while increasing the reach of the carceral state," repealing mandatory arrest laws for domestic violence situations, and fighting for clemency for those unfairly imprisoned.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do.....
For more detail visit the given link..........>>> http://Www.jobsrevenue.com
Im making over $13k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tellme how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, itwas all true and has totally changed my life.last month my pay check was $13583just working on the laptop for a few hours.Simply go to this website and followinstructions to start earning....Have a good Day..
.
.
For more detail visit the given link...................➤➤ https://Www.Coins71.Com
Goodman is a Leftist kook, but because she has ideas ancillary to her main vision that ENB agrees with, she is good to bring up.
Gotta change the narrative away from Alice Sebold, Matt Araiza, and E. Jean Carroll somehow.
Online, Google paid $45 per hour. Nine months have passed since my close relative last had a job, but in the previous month she earned $10500 by working 8 hours a day from home. Now is the time for everyone to try this job by using this website…
Click the link—↠ http://Www.Smartjob1.com
A DA who jailed me as a material witness could certainly get me to testify in his trial. I don't think he'd much like my testimony after the defense got through cross-examining me and I confessed everything I said about the defendant on direct examination was a lie, but the DA had locked me up and told me I couldn't get out unless I said what he wanted. And, of course, there would be a record of my having been jailed as a "material witness", to confirm my assertion in court. In any sort of reasonable court environment, reasonable doubt would come slithering out from under the bench and jump all over the jury, and the DA could kiss his desired verdict "Buh-bye!" Step on my toes, and I become one obstinate SOB.
Goodmark's end goals are hard to swallow: Like so many criminal justice abolitionists, her alternatives rely on a mix of vague and utopian visions (we need "a different world entirely," where everyone's needs are met and racism and patriarchy are dismantled) and ignoring the fact that material conditions can't fully account for human passions and prejudices.
All I Need is a Miracle
Author Leigh Goodmark’s end goals of abolishing prisons and defunding police are hard to swallow.
Let me guess… she means well though!
Whoa, one person can have both good, reasonable ideas and unworkably utopian ideas at the same time? And it's possible to endorse someone's good ideas while disagreeing with their bad ideas? Madness, I tell ya! All or nothing!
But... moving on, check out her truly RADICAL ideas!!!
.
I get over $25k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look it. {re-05} Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. This is what I do, check it out by visiting:-
.
Following Link:→ → http://smartwebwork03.pages.dev/
Her solution—"abolition feminism"—aims to move "away from a mindset that equates punishment with justice." Ultimately, it would involve abolishing prisons and defunding police.
Funny how people who are driven by completely different concerns and motivations-feminism, overpolicing, racism-all end up unified on what the solution must be-abolishing prisons and the police.
Abolishing prisons and the police would be a disaster for feminism-the people who actually turn women into victims need to be removed from society.
(we need "a different world entirely," where everyone's needs are met and racism and patriarchy are dismantled) and ignoring the fact that material conditions can't fully account for human passions and prejudices.
"I agree with what she's trying to accomplish here, but her 'New Soviet Man' approach probably won't work."
Step one: Recognize the need for “a different world entirely,” where everyone’s needs are met and racism and patriarchy are dismantled.
Step two: Acquire Unicorns
Step three: ????
Step four: PROFIT!
Lucy . you think George `s storry is impossible, on sunday I got a brand new Saab 99 Turbo after having made $8551 this past four weeks and just over ten-k last month . it's by-far the most comfortable job I have ever had . I started this five months/ago and almost straight away began to bring home over $95... per-hour..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://www.apprichs.com
Step three is teaching the unicorns to behave in unicorn races and not use their horns!
“”Prosecuted for Defending Themselves””
To the liberal mind defending yourself is vigilantism.
As a heads up --- take away cops and prisons and women are simply prey.
Hate to break it to you and her.
Not if every last rapist's needs are met by society up front! Betcha didn't think about that one didja?!
They need more “comfort women?”
Ah, but some rapists, maybe many or most, might consider a "shooting fish in a barrel" solution to be too easy to satisfy them.
In other words, some rapists might refuse a socially-provided rape victim; it might be that they get turned on by doing something that society expressly disapproves of.
Thus it might not be possible to meet every last rapist's needs up front, even if the women who are thrown to the rapists are unwilling participants and thus the rape itself is real from the individual women's perspectives.
I'm old enough to remember when rape wasn't about sex, it was about power, so we were told.
Todays rape is about retroactively withdrawing consent, having sex when drunk and feeling 'coerced' through persistence.
In such cases, the easiest way to reduce rape is to recognise the reality that it isn't rape. As for the rest, yeah, fish in a barrel might not do it for them on the power trip front.
Well intentioned nonsense is still nonsense. In a perfect utopian world there would be no rape/abuse/whatever ; but we have clearly established that this world is not utopian. There are far too many people whose sense of morality only extends as far as they think they can get away with. Pretending otherwise is a disservice to everyone involved. Abolishing police is just stupid, tho I would like them to be better trained, screened, and held accountable for their misuse of privileges when it occurs.
Although abolition feminism may be silly on the face of it ("a different world entirely"), the goals of decriminalizing private matters and de-emphasizing punishment are not mutually exclusive with improving "the world" by giving police a lot less to do and eliminating prisons. It is not hard for me to imagine a United States where police don't go looking for trouble on patrol but are limited to serving legitimate search and arrest warrants based on actual probable cause of real crimes (as opposed to naughty behavior) and where jails are much smaller because only a few suspects need to be incarcerated for brief periods while investigations are carried out; and prison is NEVER a punishment but a temporary safety device until the death penalty can be carried out on the few truly dangerous criminals.
To be fair, abolishing prisons and defunding police are essentially true anarchist positions/goals.
The part where the author screws up is that she fails to realize that anarchist positions require that each individual take 100% responsibility for their self defense, including the willingness and capability of killing in self defense.
Most women would never accept that trade-off in reality and would immediately start demanding the creation of police to defend them.
The only reason the Defund the Police movement still exists now is that its proponents are typically wealthy white leftist women living safely ensconced in high-income neighborhoods where crime is rare and policing is strong. They can afford to have the delusional luxury belief that they can survive in a world without police in the same way that leftists who shop at Whole Foods with its dazzling array of boutique and artisan goods can believe that communism is better than capitalism.
The book, from University of Maryland law professor Leigh Goodmark, takes a detailed look at how girls and women come to be arrested, prosecuted, and punished for such actions as defending themselves against violence or refusing to participate in the prosecution of someone who victimized them.
“One of these things is not like the other. One of these things does not belong.”
Refusing to aid the prosecution of someone who victimized you only leaves the victimizer free to victimize someone else. Like, WOW! “Sisterhood Is Beautiful”, Man!