New Poll: Bad News for Biden, Good News for Trump
Plus: France wants to target porn websites without involving the courts, Republican senators agree with House colleagues about the debt ceiling, and more...

Biden's approval ratings slip. It's still way too early to read much into polls about the 2024 elections. But as far as early election opinions go, the picture can't be comforting for Democrats. A Washington Post-ABC News poll conducted between April 28 and May 3 finds that only 18 percent of those surveyed "strongly" approve of how Joe Biden is handling the presidency, with another 18 percent saying they "somewhat" approve.
This 36 percent approval rating is down from 52 percent in April 2021 and 42 percent in April 2022. Biden's approval rating also stood at 42 percent back in February of this year.
Meanwhile, a net 56 percent somewhat or strongly disapprove of the job Biden is doing.
"This poll is just brutal for President Biden," ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos said.
One shouldn't put much stock in a single poll, especially not this far out from the actual election. But it's an interesting snapshot of the current mood surrounding both Biden and former President Donald Trump.
When asked whether Biden or Trump has done "a better job handling the economy," 54 percent said Trump and just 36 percent said Biden.
And when people were asked if they would vote for Biden or Trump in 2024, Trump enjoyed a slight advantage: Thirty-six percent said they would definitely vote for Trump and an additional 9 percent said they probably would, while 32 percent said they would definitely vote for Biden and 6 percent said they probably would. (Twelve percent said they were undecided, 3 percent said "neither," 1 percent said "someone else," and 1 percent said they would not vote.)
While I don't take too much stock in polls at this time, these numbers are striking.
Democrats, it would appear, have a Biden problem. https://t.co/MUOg2g8Jsq
— Alyssa Farah Griffin (@Alyssafarah) May 8, 2023
Democratic and Democratic-leaning voters were asked if they would like the Democratic Party to nominate Biden to run for a second term as president in 2024 or another candidate. Just 36 percent said Biden, while 58 percent said someone else.
The obvious choice for "someone else" might be Vice President Kamala Harris. But no one can really make a case for a President Kamala Harris, whose vice presidency has been as underwhelming and filled with weird missteps as her failed 2020 presidential bid.
On the GOP side, Trump is pulling further ahead of potential primary competitors. Among Republicans and Republican-leaning voters, 43 percent were in favor of the party nominating Trump as its 2024 candidate, compared to just 20 percent who said the Republican Party should nominate Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis. No other candidate or potential candidate garnered more than 2 percent support, although many conservative respondents (27 percent) said they had no opinion.
The poll was conducted among a random sample of 1,006 U.S. adults, and the results have a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points for the total sample and 5.5 points for just Republicans or just Democrats.
FREE MINDS
France is considering giving tech regulators the power to shut down porn websites without going to court. Under a proposal announced Sunday, the Regulatory Authority for Audiovisual and Digital Communication (Arcom) would be able to block and delist websites that it accuses of not doing enough to keep minors from accessing adult content, according to
The new Arcom proposal is part of a larger bill to "secure and [to] regulate the digital space," Jean-Noël Barrot, the French minister for digital transition and telecommunications, told AFP. The bill also includes provisions related to cyberstalking and gives Arcom power to stop the spread of media that the European Union has banned.
FREE MARKETS
Republican senators are uniting behind their House colleagues in demanding spending cuts before agreeing to raise the debt ceiling. A letter signed by 43 GOP senators states that they are "united behind the House Republican conference in support of spending cuts and structural budget reform as a starting point for negotiations on the debt ceiling."
???? SIGNED BY 43 GOP SENATORS ????
1/ The Senate Republican conference is united behind the House Republican conference in support of spending cuts and structural budget reform as a starting point for negotiations on the debt ceiling.
— Mike Lee (@SenMikeLee) May 6, 2023
"Our economy is in free fall due to unsustainable fiscal policies. This trajectory must be addressed with fiscal reforms," the letter continues. "Moreover, recent Treasury projections have reinforced the urgency of addressing the debt ceiling. The House has taken a responsible first step in coming to the table with their proposals. It is imperative that the president now do the same."
"As such, we will not be voting for cloture on any bill that raises the debt ceiling without substantive spending and budget reforms," the senators concluded.
Senate Republicans who did not sign the letter include Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Josh Hawley (Mo.), John Kennedy (La.), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Rand Paul (Ky.), and Mitt Romney (Utah).
QUICK HITS
Not an expert on Australian law but threatening a two-year prison sentence for selling illegal e-cigs while keeping cigarettes perfectly legal seems like a bad idea. https://t.co/ijkMSB6N8q
— Jacob Grier (is not here) (@jacobgrier) May 8, 2023
• No, the average college grad wasn't making $100,000 in the 1980s.
• The reign of Joe Biden, travel agent in chief continues. Biden and Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg "want to require more generous passenger compensation from airlines who cancel or delay flights, the latest effort by the administration to improve the flying experience ahead of a busy summer travel season," reports Politico.
• States are spending millions on child ID kits that record kids' fingerprints, take DNA samples, and warn that "over 800,000 children are missing every year." But "similar kits are available for free from nonprofit and governmental entities, and claims made by the company about the number of missing children and the effectiveness of such kits are exaggerated," notes ProPublica. (For more realistic child abduction stats, see "Enough Stranger Danger! Children Rarely Abducted by Those They Don't Know.")
• A new Cato Institute paper analyzes the Biden administration's "Housing First" program, which was instituted to address homelessness. The program aims to address "the need for permanent housing before tackling other issues, such as mental health problems or substance use disorder," explain Vanessa Brown Calder and Jordan Gygi.
• The podcast business is shifting: "Some of the most listened-to podcasts in America are struggling to sell ads as the audio business shifts toward the vast, mostly independent, 'mid-tail.'"
• "If you scratch the surface of virtually any supply crisis, you will likely find myriad trade restrictions preventing the flexibility that businesses need to adjust their behavior — just as consumers adjust theirs — in times of emergency," writes Gabriella Beaumont‐Smith.
• In case you're wondering how the 2023 Libertarian Party is going: The Libertarian National Committee (LNC) is suing the Libertarian Party of Michigan (LPMI) for copyright infringement:
The LNC has filed a trademark suit against members of LPMI pic.twitter.com/SZJ4pIqXdw
— Lew Rockwell is a Nazi (@fakertarians) May 8, 2023
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Biden's approval ratings slip.
But what about all his accomplishments?
Waking up at 10 and in bed by 6, with 90% of the pudding making it into his mouth?
He hasn't publicly sniffed a young girl in over three weeks!
He has a lighter schedule than my retired father, and worse impulse control than my demented grandfather.
So...you're saying he does the work of two men?
^this guy MSNBC's
I'am making over $140 an hour working online with 2 kids at home. I neverthought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over 17k a month doingthis and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless .And bestthing is..It's so Easy..Copy below website to check it..,
.
.
This Website➤-------------------------------------------➤ https://Www.Coins71.Com
Two men and a strong boy.
But his economy is up, this is only do to all the unfair treatment he gets from the media - buttplug
Rig count is massive.
One shouldn't put much stock in a single poll,…
Yet ENB put it in the headline.
They will adjust the next couple of polls to try to right the views on uncle Joe.
We should know by now that polls don't matter.
As Stalin put it, "It is not who votes that counts, but who counts the votes."
Victor Davis Hanson has some interesting observations and predictions (starts at 49:44) about the lessons of 2020 and the tactics likely to be employed by the Democrats in 2024:
(the Democrats) ...they're turning to process. They want to make sure that on Election Day in 2024, 70 to
75 percent of the people, depending on the particular state, do not vote on Election Day. They do not want somebody to show up on his own volition with an ID like he's cashing a check and vote. They feel that they will lose every time. They want people to mail in the ballots. And, number two, they feel that with nine trillion dollars in market capitalization in Silicon Valley, that a Mark Zuckerberg can write a check for 419 million dollars and absorb the work of the registrars in key precincts and basically take them over. And it works. And so I think the Republicans are, if they go into this presidential election saying the polls show that all the issues are on our side. The polls show that Ron DeSantis or Donald Trump is ahead of Joe Biden by two or three points, They're in deep trouble because they will use lawfare. They will have certain protocols about balloting and they will bring in so much money.
You have 50 Intelligence Officers that come out on the prompt of Anthony Blinken on the Biden campaign and they swear that this is Russian dis, looks like Russian disinformation, and quash a story. We should assume that they're not stupid so they're going to look back at 2020 and they're going to say, wow, we had a dysfunctional candidate and we had an incumbent with a very successful record and we destroyed him by these institutional processes and that we changed the outcome.
Suddenly, in America, we went from 30 percent voting absentee to 30 percent voting in person and that was by their own volition and deliberate policy. They wanted that. So I don't know how you combat that. Republicans they get all excited and they say you know what? We've got the grassroots. We're ahead in the polls. Now the issues favor us. But that won't work. They're going to have to get some very savvy, very skillful people that understand the ballot process. And they need a whole team of lawyers. These are things we've never experienced before. We've always said they were third world. We're the third world country. The United States has no moral authority to lecture anybody about ballot Integrity. We're a third world nation.
Wow, textbook case of insinuation without any real substance.
But what about all his accomplishments?
His hairplugs are still in place.
What is the world coming to when porn has lost support of the French?
A sign of the return of the Concordat of 1801
And this is all coming from the establishment left there.
"France is considering giving tech regulators the power to shut down porn websites without going to court."
The thing that guys like Gillespie in the magazine and Hank and sarcasmic down here in the comments don't seem to realize (Buttplug does but pretends otherwise), is that it's not still 1992 and the threat of censoring porn comes from the left and not the right.
And unlike the Moral Majority or Christian conservatives of yore, these guys are actually effective and successful. They were successful in Iceland, they were successful in the UK, they were successful in Canada (they just snuck it in under another bill last month), and now they're probably going to succeed in France.
""And unlike the Moral Majority or Christian conservatives of yore, these guys are actually effective and successful.""
It's funny how the left is acting like the religious right of the 80s. My problem with the religious right was their desire to demand I live under their idea of morality. Fuck the religious right and fuck the left.
What's particularly amusing from that time is that the religious right had no actual political power during the 80s. It just seemed outsized due to MTV tard-raging about them all the time, because the left always needs its bete noirs to act like they're the underdogs when it's really the exact opposite.
The religious right always supported Reagan because he was a populist, happily promoted his own Christian religious beliefs, and an unapologetic nationalist, in the sense that he believed America was the greatest country on the planet and always had been. But this idea that the 80s was some kind of puritan hellhole is revisionist history.
No sane people want the crap the current regime is selling, and the polls are finally beginning to reflect that. Note that the leads of Trump and DeSantis over Biden are basically the EXACT same, which means the sentiment is probably a lot more "Biden bad" than "Don/Ron good."
But I think it's all a bait and switch - the deep staters would be more than happy to install a good compliant regime Republican and then complete the collapse of the dollar so they can say "see how much worse the Republicans are?" even though the groundwork has now been laid for the petrodollar to go down in flames with the snap of globocap's fingers.
Then they use the crisis to consolidate power and probably blame those dirty self defense loving free speechers for the mess they themselves created, because that's what they do, EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.
Biden is, and was always intended to be, the meat shield the left/establishment uses to institute a bunch of bullshit to ruin our lives, then be thrown under the bus and blamed for that ruination.
He and Kamala are a big FU from the deep state. Showing how irrelevent voting and elections are today.
^THIS^ [in coordination with the online oligarchs, media, academia, and increasingly corporate quisling america]
https://twitter.com/amuse/status/1655927420883435526?t=d2NLGNfmEsLs0w1ypzMh_Q&s=19
FLASHBACK: The CIA’s 1944 guide to disrupting organizations…
[Link]
The CIA did not exist in 1944. At least not by that name. Right?
It was the OSS.
So funny how the Texas shooter is being treated compared to Nashville.
Round the clock media coverage (with day 1 mention from Reason, might I add) and already have a manifesto out.
Tranny shooter? FBI buried all of the social media, writings and manifesto. MSM memory holed it and instantly made it about the faux-civil rights leaders in the 'Tn 3', who are still the main focus of anything that happened in nashville...minimal focus on the shooter and the children she murdered. Oh, also Reason intentionally avoided covering it, because they are a lefty simp rag.
Lefties here: "What bias?!"
I am pretty sure the brown skinned, Mexican white supremacist's musing were written by ChatGTP.
I don't think so. ChatGPT would've probably been a little less transparent.
It was written by a single woman with some sort of literature degree.
https://twitter.com/ploughmansfolly/status/1655940823635365892?t=5SDnnWC-uD983fn2yAv93Q&s=19
The question looming over this document remains: was it written by chatGPT ‘AI’ or a mid female working at the CIA? Here BAP is, as ever, totally vindicated in his recent take: the majority of the middling masses are already only artificially intelligent. “C’est la même chose”
[Link]
Completely expected.
Exactly like left-wing political violence was not a grave national problem after a Bernie Bro attempted to assassinate the GOP Representatives and Senators at baseball practice.
As soon as the nature of the shooter was discovered to be a member of a Progressive protected class, the Nashville shooting was going to be memory holed.
Who cares about that Bernie Bro? He missed anyway.
I would trade all 435 Congress liars to save the lives of those two sisters that Garcia killed.
And the Jan 6 riot did not prevent Buden from being installed as President, so who should care about that?
Politically motivated mass murder is almost exclusively a right-wing phenomena today.
You warned Americans by repeatedly saying you had all the guns.
By today do you mean literally today? Or would you like me to post thousands of examples from the last 10 years?
Of course it is, as politically motivated mass murder from the Left is routinely buried and unacknowledged as such.
ya sure, when you decide to call any "right wing" person politically motivated, and never call a left wing person politically motivated, then all of it is on one side...by your making
Was this person more politically motivated than the tranny who shot up a Christian school? I cant think of anything more political...someone indoctrinated with far left wing propaganda that rots one's brain, and coincidentally makes you hate Christians, then murders a bunch of Christians. This isnt considered politically motivated for some reason?
But supposedly if someone is a white supremacist, this would make them politically motivated? Seems like its just a double standard so you can put the label on anyone you dont like.
Where is your evidence that Audrey Hale’s motivation was political in nature?
eyeballs, Occam's razor
They can disprove me by releasing the trannifesto
I’m sure it’s everyone’s highest priority is to disabuse you of your beliefs about transgender mass shooters, which are so important to you — I’m not sure why…
Isn't everything political now?
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
We all know that turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
There has been no significant difference in coverage despite your attempts to gaslight about it.
Both were mentioned by a Reason writer right after the shooting happened, with both linking to a news article about the shooting. Actually, there was a bit of editorializing about the “tranny” shooter but none about the shooter with swastika tats.
For both the media have a lot of creepy, salacious details right after the shooting: for Hale, things like her drawing of Jack Nicholson, for Garcia, his RWDS patch and tattoos.
Give it up. You are becoming really boring in your obsession with this hobby horse of yours.
This is false as everyone can read both articles.
"despite your attempts to gaslight about it."
*then immediately tries to gaslight us with false claims
Never change, Mike.
""For both the media have a lot of creepy, salacious details right after the shooting: for Hale,""
Was the manifesto released?
“FBI buried all of the social media, writings and manifesto.”
That’s just a flat-out lie. Within a day of the shooting, we all saw creepy drawings from her notebooks, such as the one of Jack from The Shining; we heard about her showing up uninvited to get together of her former high school basketball teammates, her awkward social behavior and how she disliked the Christian school. We heard about her manifesto, and how it was full of more creepiness.
You are just trying to manufacture a narrative that fits your anti-transgender obsession.
Can you link me to the manifesto?
National Police Association sues to make trans Nashville shooter Audrey Hale's manifesto public
So do you guys think that Mike is really this ignorant, or is he faking it and hoping we are?
link to the manifesto please. I can link you to the Texas shooters
Why is it important to see Audrey Hale’s manifesto?
wrong question.
Why was it so important to immediately see a full colonoscopy of the Texas shooter's manifesto, social media, and everything possible about his motivations, while simultaneously doing everything to hide the tranny manifesto, and sweep the story under the rug immediately.
My news feed, the top 5 articles, is full of "What were the shooter's motivations?!" today.
Not only did I not see any of that with the tranny, but my news feed was full of "Republicans pounce, are trans people safe?"
You’d have a more solid point if both cases were handled by the same police department, or were even in the same state.
More importantly, when you posted comments today saying that Garcia’s manifesto has been published, I took you at your word. I’ve been busy all day and assumed you knew what you were talking about. I don’t see any new stories about a manifesto. Can you provide a cite?
Quoting from a New York Times story from two hours ago: “The F.B.I. and state police collected his computer and cellphone and began combing through his social media profiles to see whether he had left behind a manifesto. As of Tuesday afternoon, none had been found, Mr. Sibley said.”
https://www.nytimes.com/article/texas-mall-shooting-allen.html
WTF, my brother Mike, are you rising to a whole new level of lying about shit?
Yes, please link to Garcia's manifesto.
That would be interesting to see because I have just read two articles, one in the New York Times and one in the Daily Mail, both published this afternoon that say no manifesto has been found.
"Lefties here: “What bias?!”"
The bias is obvious. One shooter is referred to as the 'Texas shooter' while the other is the 'Tranny shooter.'
trueman is a lying piece of shit, ain't he?
'The BLM protestors'
'The Jan 6 insurrectionists'
Eat shit and die, asshole.
Not being a "leftie" or a "righie", I like to think of them both as "batshit crazy shooter".
Where is this manifesto that is out?
https://reason.com/2023/05/09/new-poll-bad-news-for-biden-good-news-for-trump/?comments=true#comment-10054436
...only 18 percent of those surveyed "strongly" approve of how Joe Biden is handling the presidency, with another 18 percent saying they "somewhat" approve.
Once we're staring down the barrel of a possible Republican (scare quotes optional there) presidency I'm confident all efforts will be marshaled to overcome this enthusiasm deficit.
He may need 90 million votes this time.
And if he's up against Trump, we'll still have some otherwise sane commenters here swearing that the result is totes legitimate
"200 Million Votes for Joe, Fighting Trump and the Ultra-Right So Important That Dead and Preborn, Future Americans Exercise Voting Rights" - NYT headline 2024
We're about 3 election cycles away from that highly sought after 125% voter turnout.
We will then finally be more democratic than Saddam Hussein’s Iraq.
https://twitter.com/MikeBenzCyber/status/1655786187410358276?t=ONMBPtCOQ6iGC2AdEubaqQ&s=19
THREAD: New docs obtained by @America1stLegal show DHS plan to produce videos training bystanders to take action against political speech by “Middle-Aged Pro Life Advocates” & “Old High School Friends” who are “Budding Conspiracy Theorists.”
Report: [links]
“Take action against speech.”
You can just taste the freedom.
Free as in, "free to shut the hell up!"
Budding Conspiracy Theorists
I identify as a “this shit doesn’t add up and it’s obvious” theorist (personal pronouns: I/me). Conspiracy theory reproduction isn’t binary and the idea that it is is just a social construct invented by the cis-theory-normative white supremacist patriarchy. It’s really more of a spectrum.
Budding conspiracy theorists only cuts one way.
No one in the MSM calls the Hunter Laptop linked to Russia a conspiracy theory. Which it was. A conspiracy theory which 51 pro-Biden intel folk signed off on.
Conspiracy theories for thee but not for me.
WHY are any of the 51 propagandists still employed? Isn’t their lying behavior proof of either incompetence or bias or both?
"4. In one scenario, Ann utters the phrase “baby killer” at a local bakery event to signify her opposition to abortion. DHS gives you, the bystander, three choices: calling Ann’s husband, contacting Ann’s preacher, or stopping by Ann’s house:"
Ah, I love it when they unintentionally do things that were commonplace in the 50s. Ann is acting up? Better talk to her husband, get her back in line.
You know they're just waiting for another chance for everyone's guard to be down and they'll try to implement it all again.
Get rid of the DHS, get rid of the FBI. It's your only possible shot at delaying this another 20 years.
They'll just come up with some other org.
There is no nice solution.
The only thing that will stop this short of all out, millions dead, war are examples being made.
Bloody, mutilated, specified examples.
France is considering giving tech regulators the power to shut down porn websites without going to court.
That pot of water the frogs are enjoying has been boiling for a while now.
Neo-Nazi movement has many South/Central American roots in the far-right:
Texas shooter who killed 8 wore ‘RWDS’ patch linked to far-right extremists
...
The shooter who killed eight people at a Dallas-area mall was wearing a patch that read “RWDS” — short for “Right Wing Death Squad” — a phrase that has been embraced in recent years by far-right extremists who glorify violence against their political enemies.
...
The “RWDS” acronym is one of countless shorthand terms used by extremists. Others include “RaHoWa,” short for “racial holy war,” and “ 1488,” an alphabet-driven code combining references to a white nationalist slogan and Adolf Hitler.
...
The term “Right Wing Death Squad” originally emerged in the 1970s and ’80s to describe Central and South American paramilitary groups created to support right-wing governments and dictatorships and oppose perceived enemies on the left, said Oren Segal, vice president of the Anti-Defamation League’s Center on Extremism.
https://apnews.com/article/texas-mall-shooting-right-wing-extremists-patch-0be37dc3b41f99835a00ff1c859fd6dd
Last I checked, no-one had any evidence that the social network site where that acronym was found was in any way connected to the "Brown face of white supremacy".
So, once again, you give us more reason to doubt your tribe and their narrative.
Fish are bees.
Men are women.
Mexicans are white nationalists.
we need to build a wall to keep the white supremacists out
Why won’t Biden protect us from Nazis?
When asked whether Biden or Trump has done "a better job handling the economy," 54 percent said Trump and just 36 percent said Biden.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahah!
Go ahead and try to distract everyone with your ADL talking points but we all know this bad poll for Biden makes your blood boil! 😛
On the contrary I am hoping somehow Biden gets dumped.
I would hate to be forced to vote for him again over the Fatass Fascist Liar.
How is Trump a fascist agian?
Nationalist, Race-favoring, authoritarian who hates liberals, intellectuals, and liberal democracy. A fascist lite – not a genocidal maniac. More like Franco than Hitler.
Every thing is about race with Fatass. From his false claims about the Central Park Five to his ridiculous Birtherism.
"Race-favoring"
How was Trump "Race-favoring"? How did he "hate liberal democracy"?
You just slip in these little lies which are the crux of your whole argument and hope we won't notice.
Trump was race-favoring. That’s why he has been celebrated for his work:
1976 Humanitarian Award by the National Jewish Health;
1983 Tree of Life Award by the Jewish National Fund;
1986 Ellis Island Award given to Trump, Rosa Parks and Muhammad Ali;
1990 video of the Rev. Jesse Jackson lauding Trump as a friend to minorities and underserved communities. Jackson expressed appreciation for Trump’s support of the Rainbow Push Coalition’s initiative called the Wall Street Project, which aimed to help minority-owned businesses;
1995 President’s Medal by the Freedom Foundation (Washington) for his support of youth programs;
2007 Muhammad Ali Entrepreneur Award;
2008 Unicorn Children’s Foundation Shining Star Award;
2011 Presidential Hero Award by the Lois Pope Life Foundation;
2015 The Algemeiner Liberty Award for contributions to Israel-United States relations.
A fascist lite – not a genocidal maniac. More like Franco than Hitler.
Franco wasn't a fascist. He was a monarchist and a cultural traditionalist who was extremely effective at preventing rad-left entryism into Spanish daily life for 30 years after he waxed the commies, which is why the western left and their Soviet handlers hated him so much.
Nationalist - pretty much a job requirement for any president
Race-favoring - American isn't a race.
authoritarian- who complied with every court ruling against him
who hates liberals, intellectuals, - who doesn't? conservative one's too.
and liberal democracy.- we are a republic
A fascist lite – You are a fucking idiot. Corporate America does what the democrats demand they do. That's fascism in a nutshell.
Oh - and propaganda and hatred of independent media - the "enemy of the people" to him.
Donnie has all the earmarks of a non-genocidal fascist.
Surpirsed you didn't include any Salon links you didn't read to backup all that calumny.
"propaganda">
Do you know what propaganda is? Hint: It's not mean tweets or rhyming with opponents names during debates.
Give us an example of actual Trump propaganda. Not even asking for a cite or a link. Just an example.
"and hatred of independent media"
Are you trying to claim that the NYT, CNN, WaPo, MSNBC and for that matter, Fox, are independent and don't have party loyalties and collusion?
We've got receipts of Tom Perez giving orders to CNN and regularly meeting with the WaPo editors. Who are you trying to fool?
"...Who are you trying to fool?"
Anyone who doesn't yet know that turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
“…,has all the earmarks of….”
Haha. I see what you did there. Oh, you didn’t mean to?
Damn.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Republican senators are uniting behind their House colleagues in demanding spending cuts before agreeing to raise the debt ceiling.
Uh-huh.
"Our economy is in free fall due to unsustainable fiscal policies. This trajectory must be addressed with fiscal reforms,"
It seems that some things in this last election cycle hasn't just made the GOP remember the term "fiscal responsibility", but to actually remember what it means!
No, I don't think they'll remember if they win the next election. Still, it's better than nothing ...probably.
Remember, Republicans getting pilloried for only stopping 90%of Democrat demands is irresponsible of them but the Democrats making those demands are the champions of liberty and "our Democracy" to the Reason writers and other leftists.
Not an expert on Australian law but threatening a two-year prison sentence for selling illegal e-cigs while keeping cigarettes perfectly legal seems like a bad idea.
Not if you're Big Tobacco.
Hell, I'm giving our government two more years before they start advertising on behalf of cigarette companies to fight vaping.
Big Tobacco pays billions of dollars to various state and federal settlement accounts. If people move to vapes it will be like all those [people moving from taxis to Uber.
But "similar kits are available for free from nonprofit and governmental entities.
And how much did they pay for those "free" kits? Jesus Christ.
Yeah strange language coming from a purported libertarian
And how many of the non profits are government funded.
All of them
Biden and Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg "want to require more generous passenger compensation from airlines who cancel or delay flights, the latest effort by the administration to...
...hike the cost of air travel.
They really, REALLY do not want you traveling anywhere.
Wow, that was paranoid.
Why do you think they have such a hard-on for rail? For EV's?
Because it provides them control.
But, don't worry --- trusting the government has never been a bad idea before.
Worked out great for the Native Americans.
Black and white thinking to go along with the paranoia. The dial can be set to more positions than “total paranoia about the government” or “total trust in the government”.
But, anyway, the reason they like rail is Europeans have cool trains, and Europeans are all more sophisticated and stuff than Americans.
The reason they like EVs is they believe they are better for the environment somehow. (Like ICE automobiles aren't highly controlled... rolling my eyes.)
When has the government done anything to deserve your trust?
I'm not as willing as you to give them the benefit of the doubt with their never-ending litany of reasons to not do so.
What is your evidence I am giving the Biden Administration the benefit of the doubt on their travel policy or anything other matter?
They are open about it Mike. How are you this ignorant?
https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/world-economic-forum-calls-reduce-private-vehicles-by-eliminating-ownership
Mike is the “All is well” guy at the end of Animal House.
And the big push for walkable cities/15 minute cities has nothing to do with the government's intent to control the populous. Stop being so paranoid.
"When asked whether Biden or Trump has done 'a better job handling the economy,' 54 percent said Trump and just 36 percent said Biden."
LOL
Must be depressing to be the official hype man for the Biden economy. The guy who spent Trump's entire term (not just the pandemic year!) shitting on the economy every single day. Then pivoted to raving about the economy as soon as Biden took over: Rig count up! Manufacturing boom! Inflation is a wingnut.com myth!
And now he learns his 5+ years of relentless gaslighting have totally failed! 🙂
#DefendBidenAtAllCosts
It's just the way of the world.
Republican presidents tell gullible American guppies how great the economy is when they are president while GDP and employment are in freefall and deficits pile up.
Then a Dem (Clinton, Obama, Biden) turn in higher GDP, lower deficits, and record job numbers and Americans think WRONG DIRECTION! and yearn to hear more Republican bullshit.
#NumbersDon'tLieRepublicansDo
That's one theory.
Another is that people notice things like virtually everything they buy getting more expensive. And this.
Keep gloating about rig count though. Post that manufacturing link a few dozen more times. Insist spittin' tobaccy is the only thing that's risen in price. Yeah. Double down on your pro-Biden talking points, you'll turn things around any day now. 🙂
Not close.
Obama had record job growth of 84 straight months and record market gains with zero inflation then cut the deficit in half and people still polled WRONG DIRECTION!
#PeopleEatUpRepublicanBullshit
The same Obama who won reelection quite comfortably?
And voters absolutely will punish a GOP President if they think the economy is bad. It was a little before my time but George H. W. Bush looked formidable after the first Iraq War, and Clinton beat him with "It's the economy, stupid."
Obama is personally likeable and charismatic to non-racists.
Old Joe is just feeble and pitiful.
Don't forget that turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Haha. This is the idiot who said everything was about race to trump. Too funny.
Did I mention that turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies? It’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
"It’s just the way of the world."
Ya, it is. It's the way of the world that when everyone's stocks are ripping 20% or more per year, taxes are cut, the economy is hot, and food/gas prices are very low, people are happy with the economy.
Its also the way of the world that when stocks are flailing, the economy is stagnant, and food/gas prices are through the roof, in large part because your lefty boos insisted on keeping the economy shut down for an extended period due to a cold virus while simultaneously printing even more money, people can draw a pretty clear line to democrat policies.
Sorry your gaslighting isn't even working on your own kind anymore. It was never going to convince R's and I's, but even democrats are getting sick of seeing steak for 30+$ per lb, chicken wings for 8-10$ per lb, eggs for 5-10$ per dozen, and their monthly food/utility bills through the roof.
Unfortunately you can only piss on people so much and tell them its rain before they wise up. Just takes democrats a while longer, as they were born in the gaslighting
It’s the way of the world that when everyone’s stocks are ripping 20%
Stopped reading right there at that bullshit.
Fatass suffered us two (TWO) bear markets in just four years. (2018 and 2020) and his four year economic record was dreadful at record low GDP and no job growth with little upside in stock prices.
The only reason gas prices fell was because the economy was so shitty. Over 100 Oil/Gas companies failed or declared bankruptcy in his term.
Remember that turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Over 100 Oil and Gas companies declared bankruptcy in 2020.
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/business/energy/article/More-than-100-oil-and-gas-companies-filed-for-15884538.php
Six refineries closed in 2020.
Oil and gas suffered under Fatass rule.
States shutting down is Trump's fault how?
He didn’t dictator hard enough like the Media claimed he was dictatoring.
Yeah, the biggest dictator thing the Trump admin did was to suspend evictions.
The pandemic is Trump's fault.
Buttplug always tries to pull this and he always gets pushback, yet the very next day he’s trying to pretend that the effects of the shutdowns were somehow Trump’s fault again.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
"Fatass suffered us two (TWO) bear markets in just four years. (2018 and 2020) "
Alright, where is the one in 2018? Where is the 20% decline? By definition, there wasn't a bear in 2018.
The one in 2020 is pretty widely considered to be a COVID glitch. Especially being that it lasted like a month then sky rocketed.
So that's what you got? You stopped listening because you have a made up bear market in 2018, and a govt manufactured one in 2020, at the end of his presidency? That's your ammo?
And just to track the whole trajectory of the Dow, under 20,000 (19 and change) inauguration 2017. 31,000 January 2021.
A more than 50% increase overall increase, with COVID happening.
Biden: 31,000-33,000, a 6% increase over more than 2 years, with a stagnant economy, inflation.
Dont bring your weak economic illiteracy up in here son, no one is buying your gaslighting, and we certainly aren't buying your innumeracy either
A Brief History of U.S. Bear Markets
https://www.investopedia.com/a-history-of-bear-markets-4582652
"The bear market that started in March 2020 began due to a number of factors, including shrinking corporate profits and, possibly, the sheer length of the 11-year bull market that preceded it. "
"In March 2020, the DJI entered a bear market for the first time in 11 years due to the pandemic"
...length of bear market in months: 1.
So a 1 month bear market, caused by the pandemic, at the end of his presidency, that resolved and rocketed past in one single month.
Oh, and a made up one in 2018, to pad your numbers.
Got anything else? Maybe work on you econ 101 homework before you spout off here
Since Record: S&P is 20.06% below its intraday all-time high of 2,940.91 from Sept. 21 closing in bear market levels
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/24/by-the-numbers-sp-500-falls-into-bear-market.html
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Don't forget that turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Must be depressing to be the official hype man for the Biden economy.
I feel compelled to ask the Oracle Of SPBP2 Ownage: is the poll a psyop to get the GOP-leaning portion of the WaPo-ABC News readership to nominate Trump for the candidacy so that Biden can beat him?
Yeah, I absolutely believe #PiedPiper2ElectricBoogaloo is real.
But I don't think every poll showing dissatisfaction with the Biden economy is fake. It's believable to me that many voters would have a general sense of "I'm in worse shape financially since Biden took over."
DeSantis was just 1% less than Trump on a match-up vs Biden.
https://twitter.com/TAftermath2020/status/1655695879951761408?t=zjuL3ieFrrYC8a6PYvb_PA&s=19
Invasion. Those that voted for Biden did this. Some probably love this, most are scared shitless. Elections have consequences
[Video]
States are spending millions on child ID kits that record kids' fingerprints, take DNA samples, and warn that "over 800,000 children are missing every year."
Those poor kids, soon to be abducted by the government.
They are bringing back the draft?
No, just setting up a national database of everyone's DNA.
The podcast business is shifting...
Joe Rogan, you're days are numbered.
CNN+ has no comment.
New Poll: Bad News for Biden, Good News for Trump
No worries; we'll just fortify those elections even harder in 2024.
If you scratch the surface of virtually any supply crisis, you will likely find myriad trade restrictions preventing the flexibility that businesses need...
...to evade putting America First.
.. myriad trade restriction….
AKA lockdowns.
The Libertarian National Committee (LNC) is suing the Libertarian Party of Michigan (LPMI) for copyright infringement...
...while onstage in its underwear.
"'A new Cato Institute paper analyzes the Biden administration's "Housing First" program, which was instituted to address homelessness. The program aims to address "the need for permanent housing before tackling other issues, such as mental health problems or substance use disorder,"'
George Bush tried a version of this. I was on the "ground floor," working to design and implement a similar policy. This, simply, doesn't work. At least in CA.
OWNERSHIP SOCIETY! followed by foreclosure fever.
Bushpig Bullshit. There was lots of it.
You were banned from this site for posting links to child pornography, shit-weasel.
You were one of those Team Red Bush cocksuckers who cheered the Iraq War on and called all us opponents "unpatriotic".
No he wasn't, but you've been busy approvingly posting articles and opinion pieces from those very same cocksuckers who cheered the Iraq War on and called all opponents “unpatriotic”.
Lying, hypocritical fuck.
We all know that turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
No, you lying pedophile. I’ve been against every war or “kinetic military action” that I was politically conscious during, including in the Iraq war, which started when I was in high school, so my opinion didn't matter then. Which is in contrast to you, who falls in line with whatever propaganda is being pushed by Soros and his ilk. And unlike Biden, who (before his brain was completely rotted by dementia) would drift with whatever political winds of the day. But keep gagging on that Ukrainian cock, I’m sure whatever you’re being paid to shill here is more than your dignity is worth.
Also, nothing you said changes the fact that you’re a pedophile whose previous account was banned from this site for posting links to child pornography.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Yeah, who knew that owning a home was a money pit?
I found the program which helped the poor buy houses was just a cruel trick on the poor. If you need assistance to cover the mortgage, you can't afford a house.
They tried this many times already. Homeless destroy the property then leave if any conditions are placed on residing at said property.
"They tried this many times already. Homeless destroy the property then leave if any conditions are placed on residing at said property."
One of the main barriers were the property owners themselves: many owners simply refused to work with Section 8 Housing. This was from their personal experience (I can't blame them there), and working with an even higher-risk population of tenants from the same program...well, why would someone jump to join that?
In my 18 month experience renting out a house, Section 8 was the only positive thing about it. We got paid every month in time.
This has been the cornerstone of CA homeless policy for a few years now.
Clearly, hella effective.
I was on the “ground floor,” working to design and implement a similar policy. This, simply, doesn’t work.
Can you share some of your experiences of what went wrong?
"Can you share some of your experiences of what went wrong?"
i
Sure...
1) the program was instituted through existing Section 8 programs, and considering their myriad of rules and regulations, meant that it was going to take years to adapt to the new "goals."
2) The proposal completely ignored the fact that, even if one was successful in housing a homeless "client," rent free, that doesn't mean squat if they don't have enough income for, say, utilities, etc.
3) In other words, the bureaucracy of Section 8 doomed the effort from the outset. I had a couple of renters in the past who had dealt with Section 8 a dozen years later, and it has not noticeably changed: shortages of housing, months (sometimes years) on a wait-list, etc,
In contrast, my fiance (now my wife of 20 years), was working with Salvation Army, who had their own program. I had access, and support (sort of) from law enforcement, mental health experts, as well as Section 8 personnel. In the few months I was with the program, my wife, working only with volunteers from the SA and their affiliates, housed more people than did I.
Thanks!
You are welcome.
the "homeless" problem has nothing to do with housing. it is all about drugs, mental illness and laziness. the vagrants like living on the sidewalks in a tent collecting government services. giving them a "home" will solve nothing. the *actual* solution is to enforce the law. no one has the right to live on the streets. they all must be removed and not allowed to return. period.
The Cathedral sure is determined to pretend RFK Jr. doesn't exist and isn't a candidate.
He is a kook. But prior to the Democrats going all in defending the establishment institutions since Trump and Covid, he had been a typical kook of an accepted wing of progressive thought.
This 36 percent approval rating is down from 52 percent in April 2021 and 42 percent in April 2022. Biden's approval rating also stood at 42 percent back in February of this year.
Yeah about the best thing that can happen to Team Blue now is for Biden to die in the next few months or so, so that they can have an opportunity for an actual nomination process and nominate someone who isn't senile and 900 years old.
I think this is more evidence that Biden only got elected because he wasn't Trump.
++
You are team blue. I dont know why you guys lie so openly about your biases.
Ehhhhhh, if Biden fails to complete his term and Harris becomes President, Democrats will look absolutely ridiculous if they force out the first woman President after a few months and hand the 2024 nomination to white prettyboy Gavin Newsom or something.
Pretty boy Gavin "Hey, I intentionally defaulted on debts for my state" Newsom would be an easy, easy, easy target.
I've said before that if Newsom ran, he'd be the first presidential candidate legitimately targeted for assassination since Wallace in 1972, and probably kick off a real, actual civil war. You couldn't design a candidate more well-suited to piss off heartland red states than him, ever; he'd require a brigade of security just to get from the airport to wherever he might be going.
Who do the Democrats have on the bench that they could bring into the game?
The only name that pops into my head is Gavin Newsom, but I think there are enough people who hate him that he would go down in flames in a Presidential race.
All that matters is that you still love him, Mike.
Well, there’s always Reason’s favorite Democratic governor, Jared Polis. But he may not be pure enough for the national DNC primaries.
And he’s gay, and I’m pretty sure America isn’t ready yet for a First Gay Spouse.
Maybe I’m wrong. Seems like a gay person can now get elected to any office other than President.
Jeff lucks out. Must be why he is back today.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2023/05/judge-clears-trans-woman-of-flashing-penis-at-women-because-defendant-is-too-fat-to-show-genitals/
Chuckle.
Wow, that guy looks like Weigel.
https://en.mogaznews.com/World-News/2165612/Trans-woman-is-cleared-of-flashing-penis-at--YMCA-because-shes-too-FAT-for--trends-now.html
https://twitter.com/AuronMacintyre/status/1655938800412160000?t=HY3m1JzMAAqOisqxjJRKkA&s=19
The country is being irreversibly transformed
It doesn’t matter what your policy is on culture, crime, or anything else because it will be utterly meaningless in the face of mass immigration
[Link]
Final posts from the Allen Texas shooter...
In one of the last social media posts that he shared on the site, the killer glorified the transgender terrorist who murdered six people at the Covenant School in Nashville at the end of March. He praised how many people the shooter was able to kill and remarked “this is like the greatest accomplishment of feminism ever.”
.
In the same post, the killer seemed to attribute some blame for mass shootings to the media for the spectacle it creates behind mass killers like himself, writing:
.
The media f***ing proves it. They will never miss an opportunity to cover the event and cater the coverage exactly for sick f***s like me. Because the heart of the matter is: we all know it’s just a f***ing spectacle at this point, and the spectacle and the killer are far more interesting the the boring f***s who were killed.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/neo-nazi-texas-mall-gunman-praised-killers-including-trans-shooter-who-murdered-christians-in-nashville
Wasn't the social media site from Russia with zero followers?
I do not buy it. The government and press do not have the assumption of reliability here.
Russian social media page with zero friends/followers, complete with on the nose memes such as *forked road -> act black, or be a white supremacist*
I think they had all the bases covered including immediate manifesto released, and sources are telling me they found a Nazi-member's card in his wallet, a browser full of stormfront pages, a hitler bobblehead on his dash, and a "Jews eradicated" punch card as well.
If you asked chatGPT to write a low budget law and order episode where a shooter was a nazi, this is what it would come up with.
Well, we have to distract from the tranny kid-killer somehow.
Meanwhile leaks from the police department mention cartel tattoos.
And it was "found" by some twink from Bellingcat, which is basically just a CIA pseudonym
Where is this manifesto that is supposedly released?
https://reason.com/2023/05/09/new-poll-bad-news-for-biden-good-news-for-trump/?comments=true#comment-10054436
He praised how many people the shooter was able to kill and remarked “this is like the greatest accomplishment of feminism ever.”
Too soon to say "Well, he ain't wrong."?
You can tell a derranged killer wrote this because of how much he says "fucking". It's all the evidence I need.
So which one of you guys was it?
It wasn't fucking me, that is for fucking sure!
It is all activist judicial lawfare. Ga DA going after Trump committing many abuses from lying during depositions to attempting to force defense attorney off the case.
https://thefederalist.com/2023/05/08/defense-attorneys-allege-massive-misconduct-in-georgias-crumbling-get-trump-crusade/
Manipulation and Intimidation
During Wade’s questioning, Debrow claims he attempted to mislead and confuse her clients by suggesting the D.A.’s office had previously made an actual offer of immunity in late 2022, as opposed to merely floating the potential for an immunity deal. In one case, Debrow detailed how, when she attempted to clarify for her client Wade’s misleading questions, the prosecutor threatened to leave, rip up the immunity agreement, and indict the elector.
.
The D.A.’s office then filed a second motion to disqualify Debrow, falsely representing to the court that “some of the electors represented by Ms. Debrow told members of the investigation team that no potential offer of immunity was ever brought to them in 2022.” The Fulton County D.A. knew that representation was false, Debrow stressed in her response, highlighting the evidence previously presented to both the court and prosecutors that detailed the extensive discussions Debrow had with her clients about the initial immunity outreach.
.
Willis also sought to force Debrow off the case by arguing some of her clients “stated that another elector represented by Ms. Debrow committed acts that are violations of Georgia law.”
And despite the media hyping immunity agreements, apparently none of the electors have provided any testimony that would harm trump or kemp.
Dammit, we have to find SOMETHING to hang on him! Tony swears he's the biggest crook ever to hold office!
(But then Tony, like turd, rarely posts anything that isn't a lie)
How the media treated coverage of Nashville and Allen Texas shooters differently.
https://thefederalist.com/2023/05/08/how-can-media-identify-white-supremacy-in-hispanic-shooter-but-not-trans-murderers-anti-christian-hate/
"there was a nashville shooting?"
- Reason.com
You are straight-up lying:
https://reason.com/2023/03/27/the-problems-with-just-getting-guns-out-of-peoples-hands-as-a-solution-to-gun-violence/
"When hideous murders committed with guns make national news, as in today's Nashville school shooting, it is a natural reaction on many people's parts to call passionately for just getting more guns out of more people's hands, by any means necessary."
Of course they are lying.
How aggrieved you must feel.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/08/media/fox-baier-reputation-reliable-sources/index.html
Well that's too bad. When I did watch Fox, I thought Bret Baier was a more reasonable guy than most.
What I found most telling however was this text message from Tucker Carlson, when Fox called Arizona for Biden on election night 2020:
“We need to do something to reassure our core audience,” Carlson wrote Baier in the wake of the Arizona call, according to The Beast. “They’re our whole business model.”
And it aligns with what I've been reading lately about the whole Fox-Dominion settlement, that Fox's business model wasn't about pushing Trump lies to a duped right-wing audience, but instead pandering to their audience in the worst way possible - throwing standards out the window and just telling people what they want to hear.
Which, in a nutshell, describes a very large amount of the media nowadays, particularly online-only media - their business model isn't to "tell you the truth", it is to pander to your biases. Because you are their meal ticket.
Oh look. Another peaceful Capitol tourist being punished in Biden's gulag.
https://www.fox13now.com/news/local-news/utah-man-sentenced-to-3-years-in-prison-in-u-s-capitol-riot
Let's edit this story to describe what REALLY happened that day:
Less than 20% of j6 defendants were charged for anything related to violence or vandalism. Also.
chemjeff radical individualist 2 years ago
Flag Comment Mute User
What is there to talk about?
.
From a libertarian perspective, Ashli Babbett was trespassing, and the officers were totally justified to shoot trespassers. Again from a libertarian perspective, the officers would have been justified in shooting every single trespasser. That would not have been wise or prudent, of course.
.
They were all trespassers trying to be where they weren’t supposed to be.
Maybe cheer for political prosecutions elsewhere?
Also. Please explain why firebombing cop cars and committing arson is less of a crime than what you posted. A trans kid of a Democrat just got zero jail time for assaulting an officer.
How many cop cars did he set on fire? How many police stations did he burn down? Court houses? ICE building? How many journalists did he 'milkshake"? How many cops did he blind with lasers or fireworks? Crush their eye sockets with cement bricks? How many businesses did he loot? How many CVS and AutoZones did he burn down? How long did his reign of the autonamous zone last?
Amature.
Because some people did some bad things, all people are entitled to do bad things. Got it.
No, it is the unequal application of the law. How can you be that obtuse?
It is intentional. And he supports unequal application.
Oh, okay then. So you agree that this guy is being justly punished and is not a victim of "Biden's gulag". Right?
Yes he is a victim of Biden's gulag which punished political opponents and lets people who have committed far greater crimes go free. FFS, they tried to burn down the national cathederal and nobody went to jail for three years. All violent rioters should be in jail or none. Unequal application of the law makes it a gulag and political. Again, how can you continue to be this obtuse.
All violent rioters should be in jail or none.
So, like I said initially - Because some people did some bad things, all people are entitled to do bad things. Got it.
People with different politics didn’t get punished so it’s not fair when people with his politics get punished. The only difference is politics. That’s it. Yet the people with different politics got away with what they did. It’s not fair. Did I mention that the only difference is politics? The only difference is politics. That means the punishments are political. It’s exactly the same as the Soviets sending political prisoners to die in work camps.
Applying laws in a political and capricious manner is not justice. Give one resonable explination for the difference in treatment apart from politics. Find me one story about a swat raid on a BLM protester who was identifed by social media then arrested later.
I’m not defending anything. I do think the summer rioters got off too easy despite the lies said about me, and if you pay any attention to what I write instead of what is written about me you know I regularly mock the idea that J6 was an insurrection. However I don’t think the explanation is as simple as political parties. Ongoing, nationwide protests of police brutality by people with cabin fever from COVID house arrest vs MAGA-hat wearing yahoos thinking they can stop the certification of the election. This isn’t apples to oranges, it’s grapes to durians. No comparison.
Here is sarc defending the J6 arrests because they aren't gulag. Just like he did below.
https://reason.com/2022/09/07/the-government-needed-a-scapegoat-75-year-old-man-charged-with-opioid-conspiracy-cleared/?comments=true#comment-9689973
Here is sarc defending the disparate sentences J6 defendants are facing.
https://reason.com/2022/04/13/bidens-plan-to-ease-gas-prices-will-save-drivers-a-few-cents-at-some-pumps-2-months-from-now/?comments=true#comment-9445165
I have more links if he denies his past statements again.
He was even defending the sedition charges just last week.
To be fair, he didn’t defend the sentence and did say no when asked directly by somebody else if he agreed with it.
But his original post was obviously mocking both the guy and the people that have spoken out about the injustice of the J6 treatment.
sarcasmic 11 months ago Flag Comment Mute User Charges of trespassing, vandalism and interfering with government business are sufficient. No need to add political crimes to the list.
He had been told multiple times that the third charge listed there was the 20 year charge. And it had never been used prior even with instances like Kavanaugh.
Like I said. I bookmarked a lot of these and last week he defended sedition charges.
But his original post was obviously mocking both the guy and the people that have spoken out about the injustice of the J6 treatment.
What I am mocking is the idea that the treatment of the J6 yahoos is just like political prisoners being sent to the Gulag in Soviet Russia. I wish the people promoting that idea were being hyperbolic, but they’re not. They really believe it. And as I said above, claiming that the only difference between the summer riots and J6 is the politics of the people involved is somewhere between dishonest and dumb.
I can’t figure out why nobody calls out JesseAz when he posts things I’ve said that he thinks are gotchas, when it’s so fucking obvious that I don’t mean what he says I mean. Maybe they feel sorry for his retardation. Maybe they don’t want to appear to be defending the enemy. But they certainly can’t agree with his assertions. They’re fucking idiotic.
Sarc, you pretending to know what I post when they are cited for everyone to see the entirety of the discussion is the most dishonest shit anyone here does.
I posted even more of you defending the J6 prosecutions.
You continually lie about your prior stances.
Saying political prosecutions are fine as long is it isnt a gulag is a fucking disturbing comment. Especially when you have been repeatedly been given the facts regarding their treatment. That is a defense.
It’s exactly the same as the Soviets sending political prisoners to die in work camps.
Yes, it is. But we don't have work camps yet. Those come later when the prisons are full. You are so fucking ignorant of any actual history.
The other major difference is that every single person who attended the summer protests was a violent rioter. Every one. While the only violent people at the peaceful J6 tourism event were FBI, CIA, and Antifa infiltrators.
^totally not a strawman^
It actually isn't. We've seen versions of sarcasmic's arguments presented here:
- everyone who attended a BLM protest was either a violent rioter, or providing cover for a violent rioter, therefore guilty of aiding & abetting
also:
- the Jan. 6 riots were a false flag operation organized by the CIA and Ray Epps
Not really. As jeff said, those arguments are made in these comments regularly.
Where are your cites jeff? Which BLM non violent protestors were arrested with no bail to face threats of 20 years?
Sarc, can you provide the cites?
We’ve seen versions of sarcasmic’s arguments presented here:
That is a fucking lie. You are doing exactly what you accuse every one of your critics of. I know it, because I argued the point about providing cover for looters with you and made you look like a fool. And this is the gaslighting revisionist bullshit you post long afterward. It is new lies to cover up your old bad faith arguments because you are just that shitty a person.
Bears in trunks, jeffy. You compared a person going outside during COVID without a mask to driving around and letting a bear loose from the trunk of a car. You are a fool and always will be.
Nobody has done that in this thread, hence it is a strawman. And now you are posting one strawman to defend the first.
Nobody has done that in this thread, hence it is a strawman.
Goalposts go whoosh!
“Gonna beat my wife! Gonna slap my wife! Gonna kick my wife!…”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8IuZyStHJU
This isn't related to anything. I just think it's a funny song.
And Sarc steps in to defend one of his "true libertarians". What a joke. Unlike you, the rest of us can identify the fools by the company they choose to keep, dipshit.
And Sarc steps in to defend one of his “true libertarians”.
Dude. Learn about threaded comments. You'll look like less of a dunce.
Poor sarc, does not know the meaning of strawman, ad hominem, or goalposts. Poor, poor drunken sarc.
Sarc, back up your bald assertions. You demand it of us, so cite the comments you are referring to.
Chucky, you think you were the only one participating in these discussions?
Here's two comments, found with minimal effort, discussing the supposed collective guilt of those who showed up to BLM protests:
https://reason.com/2020/08/19/a-night-of-aimlessness-surrounded-by-flames-dispatch-from-portland/?comments=true#comment-8413416
Declare Antifa and BLM domestic terrorist organizations and ship their members off to Guantanamo. That will stop the riots overnight.
https://reason.com/2020/08/19/a-night-of-aimlessness-surrounded-by-flames-dispatch-from-portland/?comments=true#comment-8413565
I mean, considering that the people who threw paint were part of a group that also shot someone in Provost, and have been shooting/assaulting other people throughout the country, I have no issue with the gang charges. They wanna be “cool” and “edgy” and be part of what is essentially a criminal gang, they get to play by gang legal rules.
Poor sarc, does not know the meaning of strawman, ad hominem, or goalposts.
Lol, I could teach a class on fallacies from your comments alone!
Here’s two comments, found with minimal effort, discussing the supposed collective guilt of those who showed up to BLM protests:
STOP FUCKING UP THE NARRATIVE WITH FACTS!!!!!!!!
So jeff posts from JimboTBR, not in this thread, and darkflame, not in this thread to prove what people in this thread said.
Jeff is a fucking retard. He intentionally didn't post usernames.
And then sarc unconditionally defends jeff without thought. Lol.
Here’s two comments, found with minimal effort, discussing the supposed collective guilt of those who showed up to BLM protests:
No. No, no, no. You lie and cover for your lies with more lies.
Neither comment even addresses the collective guilt of protesters. The first addresses the guilt of the organizations and the second addresses the guilt of a specific group accused of assaulting and shooting people. You get an F in Logic and kicked out of the Debate Club. Just fuck off and quit flailing.
STOP FUCKING UP THE NARRATIVE WITH FACTS!!!!!!!!
You clearly didn't even glance at the garbage he posted as "evidence". How big an asshole do you have to be to continue to stump for the "bears in trunks" guy just because the same people that call out your bullshit call out his bullshit? Are you anything other than a pathetic attention-whoring shitweasel? You certainly haven't proved it today.
Chuck,
You're missing the fact that his posts were from people not even in this thread yet Jeff's claims are the arguments were made by people arguing today. His argument falls apart that people are being hypocritical or comparing J6 to BLM if he is posting comments from people not even in the thread where he is making this claim.
He INTENTIONALLY removed the names thinking we wouldn't check.
I didn't miss anything. I was pointing out that he couldn't even find posts from one-off randos that say the things he purports that regular commenters continually write.
The first addresses the guilt of the organizations
composed of members whom the author thinks should be thrown in jail at Guantanamo simply for belonging to the organization. That is collective guilt which I was told that you all forswore. Just admit that I'm right and you're wrong.
the second addresses the guilt of a specific group accused of assaulting and shooting people.
the second addresses throwing the entire group in jail even though only a few members of that group were *alleged* to have committed some type of crime. once again, collective guilt.
Oh and here's another one, this time from John:
https://reason.com/2020/07/13/homeland-security-acting-like-an-occupying-army-says-sen-wyden-after-federal-agents-shoot-peaceful-portland-protester/?comments=true#comment-8345644
There is no such thing as “peaceful protestors” in Portland. They are roving gangs of blackshirt thugs who have been terrorizing the city for months. Just tell the truth for once.
Once again, accusing them all of being thugs and terrorists.
but we both know you hate me so much you will never ever admit that I'm right.
That is collective guilt which I was told that you all forswore..
You are a damned liar. Damned by your own post.
everyone who attended a BLM protest was either a violent rioter, or providing cover for a violent rioter
That is what you accused others of saying. Not about the collective guilt of an organization or group, but ALL protesters. Nobody said it. You can't even find a one-off rando that said it. Now sit down and shut up, you fucking lefty shit-slinger.
So, like I said initially – Because some people did some bad things, all people are entitled to do bad things. Got it.
Those terms are acceptable.
Yep
"Because not every murder suspect is caught, every convicted murderer should be let out of jail." -- Spiritus Mundi
If all the convicted murderer's with Democratic Party affiliation are being set free, then yes, everyone should be, you disingenuous weasel.
I've never seen anyone argue as hard in favour of politically biased prosecutions as you. When I say you're a Nazi I'm not exaggerating.
What does being caught gave to do with having justice applied equally?
But lets use your rationalization. How many agents and millions were spent on the cathedral fire investigation compared to J6?
If 2 people commit the same crime and one is punished and the other is not solely based on their politics, is this ok? Yes or no? Go on the record. I say no.
If two people commit the exact same crime under the exact same set of circumstances, but are treated differently because of politics? Yes, that would be wrong.
But what if two different people actually commit two very different crimes, and are thusly treated very differently for various reasons, but one tribe wants to try to claim that they are actually the same crime and the ONLY reason for the different treatment is politics, because they have a political axe to grind with the other tribe? Now that’s a different story.
Glad to see you finally acknowledge that the people that set fire to a federal courthouse should have been treated the same as people who walked through open doors and stayed within the velvet ropes of the Capitol.
Surprising no one, they weren’t.
They should not have been treated the same. They are different crimes under different circumstances.
And I guess this narrative that the Portland BLM rioters got off scot-free is never going to die, is it?
Here is the guy who set fire to the courthouse. He was arrested and punished.
https://apnews.com/article/oregon-portland-12c2b8041c6dfb0e8bd76b89253a6e4f
And I guess this narrative that the Portland BLM rioters got off scot-free is never going to die, is it?
Some people were not charged, which means all people were not charged. Don't you know anything about illogic?
Jeff. Can you compare indictment numbers or just creating strawman arguments again?
Also how arson deserves a lighter sentence than the 80% non violent arrested at j6?
Here is the guy who set fire to the courthouse. He was arrested and punished.
What were you lying about again? You really should read before you link. This guy lit a federal building on fire with people inside and got time served. The Q-Anon Shaman got over 3 years having committed no violence other than trespass.
I think you should read more about the details of the individual case here.
The guy, Gabriel Agard-Berryhill, was an 18-year-old man who threw a lit firework that someone else handed to him, that he was going to throw into the street but - again - someone told him to throw it at the courthouse instead. He was a dumb teenager. He did not have the mens rea of a cold-blooded arsonist. Looks like he served about 1.5 years in prison, has a felony conviction, and also had two years of supervised release. I can't say that this is a terribly unfair sentence after looking at the whole picture.
By the way, the Qanon Shaman guy was released from prison early. Total time he was in jail was about 27 months.
By the way, in both cases, they accepted a plea deal rather than go to trial. Part of their problems here is the plea bargaining system.
Gabriel Agard-Berryhill, was an 18-year-old man who threw a lit firework that someone else handed to him, that he was going to throw into the street but – again – someone told him to throw it at the courthouse instead. He was a dumb teenager.
Seriously? That is your defense for an arsonist? He was young and stupid? At least the Shaman owned up to what he did. And got 27 months for non-violent tresspass.
Libertarianism is at its core about personal responsibility.
You don't belong here.
Also, totally not a strawman. Both BLM and J6 rioters were caught and easily identifiable.
We should give jeffy a break. I speculate he was picked on a lot in grade school after he popped the kickball because none of the kids would let him be on their team.
Says the guy who was actually too much of a bully to be accepted to the police academy, and is still bitter that he doesn’t get to go around beating and choking people for a living.
I always suspected you were the subgenius behind the KillAllRednecks posts. This one proves it.
Calling out fallacy, lies, and ignorance is not bullying, you fucking hack. Unlike you and your buddy, KAR, an actual attack puppet. Something of which you accused me of being just last week.
LOL! Looks like I am not the only one who noticed.
Wait, Chucky is a police academy reject? For being too violent? That explains so much.
Wait, Chucky is a police academy reject?
Not content with spreading your own lies? You really are the worst.
If the law isn't being applied equally, instead being applied due to political affiliation, then yes, he's a victim of “Biden’s gulag”.
Thousands of Democratic Party supporters were let off in the last three years even though they did exactly what he did or worse. You can't just punish your political opponents, Jeff.
No issues with unequal application of law?
That is banana republic BS there, which is what we have become.
I don't see where chemjeff said he has no issues with unequal application of law.
Is this due to the revelation that the FJB campaign was involved in the whole disinformation campaign regarding the Hunter Biden laptop?
Mike has assured us that the censoring of the laptop had zero effect on the election. Ignore all the polls asking if it would have changed Biden voter behavior.
I wonder if ENB has any concerns about Biden banning NY Post from a WH event.
Probably.
Do you mean the "disinformation campaign" which took the form of a letter which went to great pains to point out that, "We want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails, provided to the New York Post by President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, are genuine or not and that we do not have evidence of Russian involvement -- just that our experience makes us deeply suspicious that the Russian government played a significant role in this case."
They probably should have been a little more confident about it if they really wanted to spread "disinformation". That letter reads almost like an opinion!
I'm sure they were confident enough that the letter would serve the purpose of being exploited on media and give Biden a talking point.
Clearly election interference by today's standards. But no one will do anything about that because as Chuck Schumer knows, mess with them and they can screw you six ways to Sunday.
"...Democrats, it would appear, have a Biden problem..."
No. The world has a Democrat problem.
France is considering giving tech regulators the power to shut down porn websites without going to court.
oh no! Not the porn!?!?!
The most important aspect of liberty is porn. Without porn, we are ALL fascists...
If it passes, it’s only a matter of time till they decide other websites are detrimental to society or whatever specious reasoning they’re using.
It’s not a good sign at all.
They must be in cahoots with the French postcard industry.
https://twitter.com/ClownWorld_/status/1655868475448098818?t=MnL5Q6fomKmWzoKdrvD7zA&s=19
Oakland
[Video]
I find it funny that they do not seem to realize that those phones get disabled as being lost/stolen within 5 minutes of this occurring.
Couldn't even wait for his reparation check.
with Dr. Jill's eyes and lips locked on Mrs. Vice President's husband, who has Brandon's six?
also you know the world is a mess when the French start to Puritan up the place.
"Symone Sanders: There Will Be No Democratic Primary, No Debate Stage For Bobby Kennedy Or Marianne Williamson" - RCP
Weird. The party of 'DeMoCRacY! (TM)' has not only rigged the primary so the current entrenched establishment candidates cant lost, but we have former Biden campaign officials saying the quiet part out loud: The DNC won't be allowing a real primary to happen.
No debates, they will circle the wagons and trash anyone who challenges the establishment, and they have already set up the vote such that Biden will start with so much momentum that he cant lose.
I guess this isn't news, especially after what the establishment did to Bernie for Hilldawg
They have "superdelegates" to make sure the commoners do not really have a voice.
"Can I stop you for a second? Do you know how many people said the same thing about Donald Trump in 2015 on this show? The same exact thing.
SANDERS: Yes, because there was going to be a Republican primary. "
Mask is off. They dont even try to pretend
So, just like the Republicans in 2020, right? Weird
Weird, I dont remember seeing anyone in the know with the RNC claiming there wasn't going to be a primary. Or organizing the primary states such that Trump would be a guaranteed win.
In fact, lots of talk about a primary showdown.
Now that I think of it, the complete opposite of the DNC. You are right Jeff, it appears only the R's care about democracy
LOL all you have to do is read the Wikipedia page to realize how far you are off
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries
- RNC dissolved its debate committee (translation: no debates)
- Several states outright canceled their primaries/caucuses
https://nypost.com/2023/04/21/republicans-to-hold-second-2024-debate-at-reagan-library/
Republicans to hold second 2024 debate at Ronald Reagan Library
"The 2024 Republican candidates for president will hold their second debate at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library in Southern California, Republican National Committee Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel announced Thursday.
McDaniel made the announcement during a speech at the library in Simi Valley — but stopped short of providing a date for the debate or announcing on which outlet it would air.
The first GOP debate, which will be broadcast on Fox News, has already been scheduled for August in Milwaukee, 11 months before Republican delegates return to the city to formally nominate their choice for president."
Looks to me like there are two on the books, unless something changed since April 21, 2023.
Or maybe Wikipedia is more accurate....
I'm talking about the 2020 campaign. You know, when Republicans had an incumbent president that they wanted to protect from a primary challenge, in order to preserve power at any cost.
Both teams do the same thing. Protect the incumbent.
Can you remind me off all the candidates that ran in 2020? How many of those were polling above 1%? There are a couple of fringe candidates that are combining for 40% support against Biden right now. Even you aren't stupid enough to believe they are the same.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_the_goalposts
1. First you lied and said that, like the Democrats now, the Republicans in 2020 didn't have a primary.
2. Then you moved the goalposts and inferred the whole thing didn't count because three states out of fifty didn't hold primaries.
3. Now you're claiming your phony claims were to "preserve power" even though the vote was still held and the results were 2,549 Trump delegates to 1 for Weld.
Which puts paid to your original claim that the Republicans didn't hold any primary vote at all.
It's amazing really. Everything you say is always a deliberate lie, even when it doesn't have to be.
wikipedia? are you serious? that is a leftist, censoring website. anyone quoting wikipedia is not a serious person.
^this. Why would a person *ever* use the Wiki page as a first source lol.
He's using it because I did to counteract his first lie that primaries didn't happen.
Now he's pretending that he didn't see my link ten minutes earlier and is pettifogging about details in an effort to pretend it doesn't count.
The people who complain about Wikipedia being "biased" are typically the ones who don't like what it says because it refutes their point.
Whatabout!
The main difference being that Trump was wildly popular in the Republican Party, so much so that we were treated to daily ranting about how horrible the GOP was for standing behind Trump….
2020 Republican Party presidential primaries
"Bill Weld vs Donald Trump
Presidential primaries and caucuses of the Republican Party took place in many U.S. states, the District of Columbia, and five U.S. territories from February 3 to August 11, 2020, to elect most of the 2,550 delegates to send to the Republican National Convention. Delegates to the national convention in other states were elected by the respective state party organizations. The delegates to the national convention voted on the first ballot to select Donald Trump as the Republican Party's presidential nominee for president of the United States in the 2020 election, and selected Mike Pence as the vice-presidential nominee."
We don't call him lying Jeffy for nothing. I hope he didn't get 50 cents for that one.
This one jeff?
https://www.businessinsider.com/watch-republican-debate-live-presidential-candidates-2019-9
A sitting President who gets a remotely serious primary challenge historically loses the general election. Things that cause the Democrats to lose are by definition "anti democracy" in their minds and changing the rules is a required action.
Their rhetoric around McCarthy's speaker battle was very telling.
During a heated back and forth, with multiple sides having input, negotiating, and people taking sides, McCarthy and others working to secure votes, having to please various subsets of people to get their votes, and it being a messy drawn out process.
Democrats made fun of this, and bragged how nice and clean their process was, as new leader Jeffries properly "waited his turn" until Pelosi decided she was ready to give up power.
They actively derided a democratic process, and bragged about what amounts to a coronation / succession event. This is the democratic party, and the "democracy" they want. They would love nothing more than to have a nobility/aristocracy unencumbered by the dirty townsfolk having a say in things.
** oops **
"Parents are suing over claims teachers encouraged their sixth-grade daughters to join LGBTQ club but to keep it a secret: Girls were told 'if they are not happy in their bodies they are transgender'"
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12059347/Parents-suing-LGBTQ-club-claims-regarding-teachers-daughters.html
Weird. I was told by Jeff, Tony, and brother Mike Laursen that this isnt happening in schools. Trans people just want to be left alone. They aren't secretly grooming children, right?
They aren't, and if they are it's a good thing. /Jeff, White Mike, et al
"‘if they are not happy in their bodies they are transgender'”"
It is scary how sweeping that phrase is. Get a bad hair cut? Transgender. Did you get a little flabby over Christmas break? Transgender.
Jeffy's argument is actually, "If they don't hear this at school. where are kids supposed to hear about it? Most parents are not going to want their kids to even know about suicidal ideation and self-mutilation."
Goddamn conservatives!
"Most parents are not going to want their kids to even know about suicidal ideation and self-mutilation"
The parents are the real extremists.
"Parents are suing over claims "
Suing over claims? What's this, make work for lawyers month?
Don't you pay attention to SCOTUS rulings? Every month is make work for lawyers month.
Can you link to where I said such things aren't happening in schools?
(Hint: You won't find one. I never said any such thing. Jeez, you've gone into blatant lying mode today.)
Prediction: it won't be too much longer now until more democrat candidates decide to find their balls and officially jump in to challenge Sleepy Joe, with most likely Gavin Newsom leading the way first. Sleepy is more vulnerable in his own party than any incumbent president since LBJ 55 years ago.
Sleepy will maintain his near unanimous support among the negroes, the far left media, and the thoroughly corrupted Washington DC establishment. However, his support among non DC area whites is dropping closer and closer to zero with each passing day.
If the non DC area white democrats are able to pick an alternate to consolidate around (which is by no means a given), senile old Sleepy Joe will likely be toppled. But if they don't consolidate, we'll be dealing with this creepy old asshole for at least another year and a half, at minimum.
"no one can really make a case for a President Kamala Harris, whose vice presidency has been as underwhelming and filled with weird missteps" And yet no one could really make a case for a President Joe Biden either, and yet he was nominated and elected President. I feel as though I'm living inside a dystopian sci-fi novel!
Weird......not the word I would have used.
"And yet no one could really make a case for a President Joe Biden either, and yet he was nominated and elected President."
It was his turn. Case closed.
His turn would have been in 2016 after being VP for two terms. But someone decided it should be her turn instead and lost the election.
"But someone decided it should be her turn instead and lost the election."
Her turn was 2008 but Obama jumped the queue. Her turn was bumped to 2016, and Biden bumped to 2020.
There was a case:
– He was Obama’s vice president.
– His name is well known.
– He was safe and boring.
- He wasn’t Trump.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UviieCwwmRU
At least senator Blutarsky has the correct reply
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ct_33t9uuAc
No, I wasn't wondering how the Libertarian Party was going, but thanks for asking.
"Housing First" - "America First" - if everything's "First" then what's "Second?" Anything?
"Safety third" not so funny now.
Safety last! - Ash Williams
“This trajectory must be addressed with fiscal reforms.” Quick question: Why didn’t the GOP “address” fiscal reforms when they owned both Houses of Congress and the White House. Why do they only “address” these things when they can’t possibly pass? Enquiring minds want to know!
bad approval ratings for biden does not necessarily translate into fewer votes in 2024. want proof? one word: fetterman. democrats will elect anyone and the person's qualifications or abilities are not relevant.
It's like election fortification stopped being a thing after 2020 or something.
It depends on who their opponent is, doesn't it?
Biden never would have been elected had he been running against a "RINO".
This 36 percent approval rating is down from 52 percent in April 2021 and 42 percent in April 2022. Biden's approval rating also stood at 42 percent back in February of this year.
This seems to coincide with the dramatic user shift to Mastodon.
More than anything this poll suggest that Americans do not want a rematch of 2020. At this point there seems little to suggest they will get anything other than that rematch. If the election were today President Biden would have to worry. The election is in 19 months and if it is still Biden vs Trump, I predict people will pick Biden.
BTW - good news for Trump is he up in the polls the bad news is that he lost another court case. I see little to suggest that his losing streak will change in the next 19 months.
"" The election is in 19 months and if it is still Biden vs Trump, I predict people will pick Biden.""
A sizable percentage of the population believe we are heading in the wrong direction. If things got better I might agree with you. If things stay on the same trajectory it will probably go to Trump. And that scares the shit out of a lot people.
What does it mean "we are heading in the wrong direction"? People don't like where we are heading but is there a uniform opinion on where we should be heading, I doubt that. That why these right direction wrong direction polls are almost uniformly wrong direction. The person who wants the government to do more and the person who wants the government to do less get counted as the same.
"A federal jury in New York City found that Donald Trump defamed advice columnist E Jean Carroll with an October 2022 social media post in which he called her allegations a “con job”, Reuters reports."
"I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA WHO THIS WOMAN IS. THIS VERDICT IS A DISGRACE – A CONTINUATION OF THE GREATEST WITCH HUNT OF ALL TIME!"
I wonder if she can sue him again, each time he defames her? You just know he will say it again...
I don't know about Ms. Carroll, but I am sure that Judge Kaplan is about at his limits, and I would not be surprised to see sanctions issues.
If calling someone a con job is winnable defamation, Trump would be the richest man in the world.
Thanks, ObviouslyFullofShit!
Stuff your TDS up your ass; your head wants company.
Trump is fuming on TRUTH Social, saying the trial was held in an “AN ANTI-TRUMP AREA”. The “ANTI-TRUMP AREA” is his home town.
He is also falsely claiming on TRUTH Social that he isn’t “allowed to speak or defend [himself]”.
Trump got the same chance to examine and strike jurors as any other defendant. The difference is that he had a team of high price lawyers making the picks. The average person has their lawyer if he is lucky and maybe a public defender if he is not lucky. So I am not buying Trump's BS.
Well... Mike will applaud it as government free speech.
Expect more of that as the election gets closer. They got a taste of what they can do with their heavy-handed "anti-disinformation" censorship in 2020 and their going to go full Pravda for 2024.
It may also be illegal based on laws passed a half century ago.
It was ABC.
https://nypost.com/2023/05/05/will-media-censors-never-quitabcs-foolish-omissions-in-rfk-interview/
" “This part of the interview he expressed misinformation so we’re not showing it to you.” Fucking Pravda shit."
This line of thought is going to be used to prevent debates too, along with a pinch of "we don't want to give [X] a platform."
And a huge trans groomer fan.
Thing is...he is a fairly goofy candidate.
And he STILL gets 20% against "the most voted for President in history".
...which clearly means Biden exceeds 90M votes in 2024.
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do.....
For more detail visit the given link..........>>> http://Www.jobsrevenue.com
Online, Google paid $45 per hour. Nine months have passed since my close relative last had a job, but in the previous month she earned $10500 by working 8 hours a day from home. Now is the time for everyone to try this job by using this website…
Click the link—↠ http://Www.Smartjob1.com
I wish Trump had been like Franco
Wasn't that Al Gore's wife, Tipper?
We all know the answer.
Dee Snider sitting in front of Congress and giving them a verbal tongue lashing was one of the greatest things to happen in my youth.