Feds Want to Penalize Overly Complicated Subscription Cancellations at $50,000 a Pop
A government big enough to "solve" your minor irritants will do plenty of other stuff you don't like.

What kind of monster doesn't want the federal government to make it easier for consumers to cancel unwanted subscriptions? That's the unspoken premise behind basically every headline covering last week's Federal Trade Communication (FTC) notice of proposed rulemaking to mandate "click to cancel" functionality on companies that use "negative option marketing" tactics such as free trials and automatic renewals.
"Still trying to quit that gym membership? The FTC is proposing a rule that could help," reported NPR. "Frustrated over canceling a subscription? Relief may be coming," offered The Washington Post. CNN added, in the most common headline formulation: "FTC wants to make it easier for consumers to cancel free trials and subscriptions."
The proposed rule requires negative-option sellers to provide, under maximum penalty of $50,120 per violation per day, a mechanism for cancellation that's "at least as simple as the one used to initiate the charge," via the same medium (app, website, phone, mail, etc.). Explained FTC Chair Lina Khan on Morning Edition: "When you're talking about companies that have hundreds or thousands or millions of consumers, that could add up quite quickly."
This borderline-gleeful attitude is part of the reason Khan is a figure of constant controversy. But it's also consistent with the policies of President Joe Biden, who spent paragraphs of his State of the Union address in February railing against "junk fees," travel surcharges, and so forth. "Americans are tired of being—we're tired of being played for suckers," Biden said.
The only Republican appointee on the FTC, Christine Wilson, was also the lone vote against the FTC's proposed rulemaking last week. And though you'd be hard-pressed to find any of her specific objections in all those "Subscriptions can be hell to cancel" headlines, her dissent points out that the rule as written constitutes a major regulatory power grab:
the Notice explains that "the proposed Rule prohibits any person from misrepresenting, expressly or by implication, any material fact regarding the entire agreement—not just facts related to a negative option feature." It further explains that "[s]uch deceptive practices may involve misrepresentations related to costs, product efficacy, free trial claims, processing or shipping fees, billing information use, deadlines, consumer authorization, refunds, cancellation, or any other material representation."
Consequently, marketers using negative option features in conjunction with the sale of a good or service could be liable for civil penalties or redress under this Rule for product efficacy claims or any other material representation even if the negative option terms are clearly described, informed consent is obtained, and cancellation is simple.
Emphases added. Though you would never know it from the shallow THEY FIX PROBLEM! news coverage, the FTC is telling the estimated 106,000 businesses that use such subscription-renewal techniques that they will face potentially crippling fines if activist bureaucrats deem any of their business processes, whether related to subscription renewals or not, to be misleading.
Such regulatory mission creep is as predictable as receiving an AARP card in the mail during your 50s. Governments that are big enough to police the language of magazine auto-renewals are guaranteed to intrude on personal consumption choices in ways that even corporationophobes find uncomfortable. The FTC's vigorous exertions under Biden include:
* Asking Twitter to rat out the names of all journalists involved in working on the #TwitterFiles series of investigations.
* Proposing—without any relevant legislative prompt—a near-total ban on workplace noncompete contracts.
* Attempting (before being thwarted by a federal judge) to block Meta's acquisition of a virtual reality company on the legally adventurous grounds that in doing so the Facebook owner would prevent itself from innovating in the virtual reality space.
* Challenging Microsoft's purchase of a video game company, because reasons.
* Investigating Amazon for, in the words of Reason's Elizabeth Nolan Brown, "everything from its purchase of the robot vacuum maker iRobot to whether digital voice assistant Alexa violates the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act and how it decides which marketplace products to give the 'Amazon Choice' label."
Khan's regulatory zeal and process overreach has led Christine Wilson to announce her resignation from the commission, citing Khan's "disregard for the rule of law and due process," among other complaints.
The click-to-cancel rule is guaranteed to jack up compliance costs (which hurt small entities hardest) and drive some current practitioners out of the negative-option market altogether. No more easy-peasy renewals for your favorite poetry magazine or coffee roaster.
But don't worry, the proposal is still open to feedback from the public. And The Washington Post's Michelle Singletary, for one, wants to make sure the process is impartial: "This is your chance to be heard. If you have a horror story about canceling a free trial, auto-renewal or subscription, tell the FTC."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Holy shit! It's fucking shameless how Reason hates on Republicans while never being critical of Democrats! They're fucking leftists, one and all!
Still broken. Shouldn't you continue being gleeful about political prosecutions? That's been your shtick for 2 days.
Political? ha.
What snowflakes. Accept your con man already.
I am making over $30k a month working part time. I am a full time college student and just working for 3 to 4 hrs a day. Everybody must try this home online job now by just use this Following
Website........ http://Www.Smartjob1.com
I suspect JesseAz is one of the people referenced here.
I am able to obtain 80 dollars per/hr to complete easy work working off of a home computer. I not at all realized that it is possible however one of my greatest mate has collected $25k only within three weeks completing this super job furthermore she satisfied me to avail.
Discover further guidance by reaching following
website. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .>>> http://Www.jobsrevenue.com
Nope. These must be the ideas you always talk about.
I probably would get why you think cancelations are difficult being a lazy alcoholic.
You need to fuck off, you little pussy. Run and hide little girl.
I am making a real GOOD MONEY (123$ / hr ) online from my laptop. Last month I GOT chek of nearly k, this online work is simple and straightforward, don’t have to go OFFICE, Its home online job. You become independent after joining this JOB. I really thanks to my FRIEND who refer me this SITE. I hope you also got what I…go to home media tech tab for more detail reinforce your heart… ══════HERE►► https://salarycash710.blogspot.com
https://salarycash710.blogspot.com/
Well, see, here's the problem: You try to cancel, they don't cancel, so they get another month or two of your $25 or $50 monthly payments. Which is shitty, your money is just gone, but you're not going to sue them for it because it's not cost-efficient to do so. So they screw you over and face no consequences.
I don't know if THIS is the proper solution for it, but "Click to subscribe, call to cancel" is an exploitative business practice.
Bingo.
This is a well defined problem with a well conceived solution. If all government regulation were this straightforward, we wouldn’t have to be libertarian.
Except the article (which, yes, take anything written here with a grain of rock salt) suggests the new rule goes way past that. Also, given Khan's history, I trust anything she proposes about as far as I could throw a Mongolian pony.
It's nice to know someone actually reads the article instead of skipping straight from the headline to shit-flinging in the comments. The proposed regulation is practically a blank check for the anti-corporate jihadis. It also has lots of potential to drive up compliance costs, which always favors larger companies over small ones. This is pretty perverse, coming people who regularly proclaim their horror over any business that's "too big".
Actually, you are going to sue them over it (or someone is in your name, anyway) because this is exactly what class action lawsuits are for.
Which calls for the question "why haven't these practices already been sued out of existence". Possible answers are:
1. They have (and the political hype and fearmongering is largely an exploitation of practices that are no longer common).
2. They are so uncommon that even class action lawsuits aren't cost-effective.
3. Cancellation isn't actually all that hard, we just like whining about those "evil corporations".
4. Plaintiffs' lawyers are stupid and don't see the easy money (which, given the other suits that get filed regularly, seems unlikely).
My guess is that, because politicians like to run to the front of the parade and pretend like they are leading it, it’s 1 and 2.
As in it's a problem that's already been fixed by courts and markets, and the politicians are just using it as an excuse to obtain more power.
Entirely possible, although I'm not generally a big fan of class action suits. They're often little more than welfare for lawyers, while supposed plaintiffs get pennies on the dollar. And while some may solve or at least improve actual problems, others strike me as pretty frivolous. Defending against those imposes dead weight losses on businesses, driving up prices for consumers with little benefit.
And the customer service line is only open on alternate Wednesdays in prime numbered months from 2:35 to 2:57 AM, and they forget to adjust for DST.
I'm sure others have nightmare stories, but I don't think I've ever had difficulty canceling anything online.
Pretty much every streaming service I've used started as a free trial or discount. And just threatening to cancel usually leads to an offer for a free month (Hulu) or extension of the reduced price (HBO Max, Starz). If I reject that, the cancelation process is done within a minute or two.
#YMMV
Gym memberships are notorious for this.
SiriusXM radio is another example.
In our current “trial subscription “ business model, it’s more common than you think.
Yeah, my one big cancellation story is a gym membership one.
Local gym went out of business but kept billing us.
You can't cancel if they don't answer the phone.
Total PITA to get it handled through the credit card company.
I was going to get a membership at the local gym but they wouldn’t take cards. They required a voided check so they could have direct access to my bank account. Fuck that. I told them to screw. Buyer beware.
Use a credit card issued BY your friendly LOCAL bank or credit union. If they start slamming yu, call your card issuere and report the fraud. Every time I've asked they've taken MY side. They also seem to have a way of blacklising phoney charges so if they try and re-charge a second time it goes nowhere.
Banking with the BIG banks (BofA, Chase, WellsFargo, etc" they never seemed to care. So I blew them all off and have happily been using regional banks and credit unions. this is no longer a problem.
So the gymn won;t take plastic? Fine. Select a reliable credit union and go ahead, give them a blank check. When you try to end the game and they keep hitting yu. close that account, and reopen a new one with them. Let them know NO NE can "forward" any checks from the old account to the new one. They have now hit a dead end. Send them an email and/or written notice, keep a copy, dated and signed.
Credit Unions are the best financial institutions..partly because you are not a "customer" but a "MEMBER" Make sure yours is part of the "shared branching" network. That makes your local debit card work at tens of thousands of other credit unions without incurring any fees, all across the nation just as if you had walked into your local branch back home.
Very good. I agree entirely. Of course I never take a "cancel after your free trial offer", so I mostly avoid this crap.
I've been doing my banking through my local credit union for nearly thirty years now. They generally offer better service and lower fees, and I highly recommend them. But even the big-name credit cards I use have consistently supported me with minimum hassle when I've had issues. They all offer various cash-back benefits, which is about the closest thing there is to free money. Two or three percent may not sound like much, but it adds up. Plus I never use the cards to buy things I can't afford. I pay off the balance every month, so my effective interest rate is zero.
The easiest way to cancel an automatic charge is to simply cancel your credit card and replace it with a new one. That way the automatic monthly charge "fails", then "they" have to call you.
Personally, I try to avoid these "free" trials just to avoid any possible hassle or the risk of my own carelessness costing me money. That said, the last time I had any major hassle was probably at least a decade ago. Just keep saying no, and most companies will quickly get the message.
Seriously though, boo fucking hoo.
That’s what a trial subscription means, right? Cancel if you don’t like it.
For example you want to watch a movie on Amazon that’s on a paid channel, so instead of renting the movie you subscribe. Then immediately after go to subscriptions and cancel. Pay for one month while having access to the entire catalog. If you keep the subscription and pay any attention to your bank statements, you’ll only pay for one unwanted month. It’s not rocket surgery. Do people need bubble wrap for their credit cards?
You suck at reading comprehension. This isn't about companies that let you cancel online.
The government is talking about "Negative Option Marketing" which means if you don't cancel then the subscription/membership continues, and they're complaining that the companies are tricking people into paying more.
What the bill does is it allows unaccountable bureaucrats to arbitrarily fine companies if they deem the messaging to be "misleading."
It's a fix to a non-problem that is guaranteed to be abused.
It's also about letting the anti-corporate jihadis at the FTC punish companies for violations that have nothing to do with the auto-renew feature. "Protecting" consumers from difficult cancellations is nothing more than the camel's nose in the tent.
what kind of moron needs the federal government to help quit the gym?
An average moron.
Remember, half the population has an IQ below 100.
the solution would be to stop morons from joining the gym, but in today's graft-economy solutions are not met with cheer
Help me daddy gov! Help me!
While it’s not the solution I would have chosen for the noncompete problem, it’s what you’d expect from congress after years of abuse by tech companies.
I’d have simply required them to be posted with the job description, but this works too.
It’s obvious the authors have never had to deal with them personally. You’ve quit your old job and on day of your new job, you’re asked to sign something promising to never work for the companies that most value your skills.
“Sign it and fight it later” isn’t good public policy.
Oh c'mon, it's our god given right to be fucked by these companies!
Unlike government, companies only fuck you if you ask for it.
And only government has the power to demand at gunpoint that I pay for the privilege of being fucked.
"*Asking Twitter to rat out the names of all journalists involved in working on the #TwitterFiles series of investigations."
That would be a "so called" journalist, wearing a tin foil hat.
This is to take down Substack. Too many dangerous misinformationists on that site.
I have used the simple and straightforward technique of reading the fine print before signing up for anything "free".
Any company that has not honored a commitment to cancel is met with a simple letter quoting the fair credit reporting act, and a reversal by the credit card company. Takes about five minutes and the cost of two stamps.
To quote Cool Hand Luke; "Cap'n, I wish you'd quit being so good to me".
what we have here ... is failure to communicate
It wouldn’t bother me so much if they gave the person trying to cancel the subscription the 50 grand.
How does this proposal (however wrong parts of it may be) prevent "easy-peasy" renewals? From what I've read in the media (although I've not read the actual proposal) it doesn't seem to prevent ongoing subscriptions, just insure that they are as easy to cancel as to enter into.
Yeah, except as the article explains, the proposed policy will also let the anti-corporate jihadis at the FTC punish companies for things that don't actually have anything to do with the auto-renewal feature. Driving up compliance costs will potentially drive smaller providers out of any given business, which is pretty perverse for people who shudder in horror at the mere thought of any company that's "too big".
Reason MAGAZINE writing a defense of magazine auto-renewal policies, with no disclaimer that that is one of their own practices. not that I've tried to cancel mine. Yet.
I ran into this problem with one of the medical alert companies I had purchased a subscription for my mom. She died a month into a new year and the company insisted I pay for a whole year and hit my Discover card for the whole year. Discover was great help to the medical alert company even transferring the charge to my new card as the old card had expired. I went on every rating site I could find and gave a bad rating to the medical alert company and gave them bad reviews. Apparently this was a common problem with the medical alert companies. Pure rip-off of families that tried to do right by a loved one. They finally came back to me and offered a part refund if I amended my reviews. I said yes. I also cancelled my Discover card.
This problem could have been solved by the banks or credit card companies, but they did not want to. Even after you tell your credit card company that your card has been stolen, the gym is still able to keep charging membership fees to the new credit card number. You really do need to close your credit card or bank account to get those charges to stop sometimes.
Given that I was laid off in a terrible financial circumstance a year ago, Google’s weekly benefit of 6850 USD in local currency is astounding. “W Many Thanks Google Reliable for Gifting those Rules and Soon It’s My Commitment to Pay and Rate It With Everyone.. right now I Started..”
https://apprichbaba.blogspot.com/