The Feds Are Buying Their Way Around the 4th Amendment
Government agencies have paid to access huge amounts of Americans' data.

A Republican congressman last week highlighted an oft-overlooked threat to the privacy of all Americans: The federal government's practice of purchasing citizens' private market data (PMD) from data brokers without a warrant. Rep. Kelly Armstrong (R–N.D.) raised the issue at the House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government's inaugural hearing.
"The federal government has realized the value of the massive amounts of commercial consumer data that is freely available on the open market," Armstrong said. "Combine [the amount of data available] with the advance in technology like [artificial intelligence], facial recognition, and more, that will allow aggregation, analysis, and identification, and we are fast approaching a surveillance state with no assurances other than the promises of our government that it will not abuse this tremendous responsibility."
Americans leave a trail of personal data while using the internet and online platforms, data that are collected by website cookies, social media platforms, mobile applications, and myriad other digital information hoovers. This information is collected, processed, and sold by data brokers. Private companies buy this data from brokers in order to shape their advertising strategies, but the data are also sold to the government.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), for instance, purchased location data to monitor compliance with COVID restrictions (among other purposes), according to documents reviewed by Vice. In 2017–18, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Criminal Investigation unit paid to access location data to bolster enforcement efforts. After reviewing a database similar to the one accessed by the IRS, The Wall Street Journal reported, "In many cases, the data is precise enough to clearly identify the home address of the phone's user, which can then be cross-checked against public databases showing property ownership records or rental address history."
Under modern case law, the Fourth Amendment does not constrain the government's purchasing of PMD, as such transactions require neither search nor seizure. "The government can buy business records without a warrant or any cause," according to Orin Kerr, a law professor at the University of California, Berkeley. "The Fourth Amendment does not apply." Furthermore, Kerr writes, when multiple parties have claim to data—e.g., the data broker and the user who generated the data—either one may choose to disclose it to government officials.
An understanding of just how much data individuals continuously and voluntarily create is necessary here. "In 2018, people created, captured, copied, and consumed 33 zettabytes (ZB) of data—approximately 33 trillion gigabytes or 128,906,250,000 maxed-out iPhone 12s' worth of information," Klon Kitchen, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, wrote in 2021. "This number jumped to 59 ZB in 2020 and is predicted to hit 175 ZB by 2025. Put another way: Humans currently produce 2.5 quintillion bytes of data every day. If you laid flat 2.5 quintillion pennies, you could cover the earth's surface five times."
Data brokerage was estimated to be a $200 billion industry in 2020. Acxiom, a prominent data broker, had data from 500 million consumers worldwide (with up to 3,000 data points on each individual). One broker obtained 3 billion "new records" every month, according to a Federal Trade Commission report from 2014. In the intervening years, these figures have likely ballooned.
While Americans generally understand how to maintain personal privacy in the meatspace, most are entirely unaware that their daily online activities—e.g., visiting a website—generate personal data that could be processed and sold by brokers. Congress must codify extra–Fourth Amendment restrictions on government actors, curtailing their ability to purchase PMD without robust judicial or other supervision.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Muh Private Companizes!!!!
Mike and sarc are having major breakdowns today with all the articles showing libertarian alignment with conservatives in congress. They are far from perfect. Nobody is saying as much. But they are rationalizing every article as both sides in defense of the dems. Has been amazing to watch.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,500 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,500 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.JobsRevenue.Com
"....and we are fast approaching a surveillance state with no assurances other than the promises of our government that it will not abuse this tremendous responsibility."
Guess I'll know for sure when I am not allowed to board an airliner. Or pass a background check.
Government will not fix this problem because government wants this information. We need to put pressure on our representatives and senators, as well as start filing suits against the government.
Simply hoping your team will win next time around will NOT solve this issue, because your team won't fix it. Gotta put pressure on both teams even your team. Because this issue didn't start with Biden, it's been simmering for twenty years now.
Google pays an hourly wage of $100. My most recent online earnings for a 40-hour work week were $3500. According to my younger brother’s acquaintance, he works cs-02 roughly 30 hours each week and earns an average of $12,265. I’m in awe of how simple things once were.
.
.
See this article for more information————————>>>http://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
Holy hamburger!
I am the fourth commenter and still no "I have made $2,000 a day working from home on line" with three of the same type of replies?
Time to check temps in Hell.....
Moderators finally rolled out of bed...
“Moderators”. LOL
LOL - I saw the dollar sign in your post and almost automatically flagged it!
Good thing that, on the internet, nobody knows you're a dog. woof
Valentine's Day Poetry Thread
Roses are red
Asphalt is black
Take off your dress
and lie on your back
married a blonde chick
asked her on Valentine's Day
didn't last two more
I think it's pretty clear that our government is clearly hostile to Bill of Rights and the constitution. Whether it's censorship by proxy or this blatant end-run around the 4A, they clearly have no intention of following it. It's probably always been hat way, but it seems they're getting way more brazen and open about it, or they're just getting sloppy. Either way, I think it's time to fire up the woodchippers.
Make sure the chippers are sharp. No point in it jamming up on a congressman's lapel pin...
Ironically but a reflection of voters who are clearly hostile to the Bill of Rights and the Constitution. How many times has people heard those campaign make promises to BREAK and VIOLATE the Supreme Law in order to get elected?
>>we are fast approaching a surveillance state
bro 2006 called.
Public-private partnerships.
Or fascism.
Take your pick.
Public-private partnership versus private-public partnership. Bigly difference. Both are still fascism however.
Yes, the private-public partnership is what we used to call "a bribe".
...that use to end up putting those in power behind bars for treason.
It truly is amazing how lax/accepted criminals in D.C. has gotten..
Crony Capitalism, aka "Crapitalism."
The Feds Are Buying Their Way Around the 4th Amendment
And the first amendment, but I'm told Section 230 negates that, so.
They buy their way around anything resembling justice for the little guy.
Up against such a behemoth, where the amount that would bankrupt even a wealthy person is a rounding error for BigFed, only a miracle lets the average American come out ahead.
Meatspace? I assume you mean Metaspace?
I think meatspace is the opposite of metaspace. You've coined a term!
"Meatspace" is a term that's been around for a long time. I'd say ~20 years.
Made the urban dictionary in 2005:
meatspace
noun. a term, originating from cyberpunk fiction and culture, referring to the real (that is, not virtual) world, the world of flesh and blood. somewhat tongue-in-cheek. the opposite of cyberspace.
Maybe we shouldn't listen to Orin "Government can do what ever it wants" Kerr then.
Sorry committee leader... I don't think MORE legislation isn't going to fix this ... just like the Supreme Law didn't fix it.
I'm afraid there is going to have to be PROSECUTION (i.e. actual consequences) before Nazi's stop running the USA. I mean good grief just listen to the second speaker Plaskett talk about how this committee is some kind of partisan attack and "right-wing conspiracy theories" ... the Nazi's favorite projection tactic.
It's past time to start prosecuting agency leads and impeaching congressmen. The US Constitution EXPECTS this. It has to be enforced if it's suppose to mean anything at all; and frankly since it's the VERY DEFINITION of this nation; any dismissal of it classifies that act as an act of treason and an aggressive attempt to conquer the USA.
IMo that, the 4th amendment's 'unreasonable siezures' does apply, since there isn't any reasonable need for the Government to collect that data.
FFS. The knee-jerk libertarian approach to all of this is blindingly ignorant. Those same people assume that whatever the private sector is doing in vacuuming up everything from everybody else is the act of making that data 'corporate property' that they can do with what they will. But if the govt buys that from the vacuum company, then its not corporate property after all and it is instead a violation of the individual rights of the person who provided that info - wittingly or (mostly) unwittingly.
Those basic first principles of data privacy and protection have always been dealt with SOLELY inside the conference rooms of lawyers and other technocrats. From Alan Westin to the 1980 OECD Protection of Data Privacy to the GDPR, there has NEVER been a public discussion of any of this to individuals and our freedom. All we have seen is the outcome - from Kafkaesque violations to identity theft to Facebook-is-free.
But we have all seen a full range of the issues here. So maybe it IS time for a public discussion of this whole data-privacy-computers-exchange-security stuff. BEFORE we just assume everything up to now has been kosher.
Almost Dead
Any constitutional lawyer will tell you that the Fourth Amendment has been moribund for years. We have allowed a progressively tyrannical government to destroy one of the most important building blocks of Americans' liberty. The slide began in 1913 with the Sixteenth Amendment, the income-tax.
So, what to do and how to do it? Many complain, but few offer solutions. How about a solution based upon the original Constitution and Bill of Rights modified slightly to incorporate the Scientific Method, about which the Framers knew nothing? This commentator offered one in the semi-fictional novel, Retribution Fever.
If the founders had intend for ed public information to be excluded, the would've said that.