Police Officer Who Kneeled on a 12-Year-Old Girl's Neck Faces a Federal Lawsuit
According to the suit, the officer "acted with malice or in reckless disregard of Jane Doe's federally protected rights."

Last year, an off-duty police officer placed a 12-year-old girl in a prolonged, illegal chokehold while breaking up a fight at a Kenosha, Wisconsin, middle school. Now, the girl and her family are suing the officer, alleging that his actions constituted excessive force and unlawful arrest.
According to the lawsuit, filed Monday in the U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Wisconsin, Shawn Guetschow, an off-duty Kenosha police officer working as a security guard at a local middle school, unlawfully restrained a 12-year-old girl while breaking up a fight that occurred last March. The complaint states that the sixth-grader—named only as Jane Doe—was acting in self-defense after being attacked by another student in the school's cafeteria. While attempting to break up the fight, Guetschow allegedly fell backward while holding onto Doe, hitting his head on a cafeteria table.
According to the complaint, Guetschow appeared to believe that the girl had caused his fall, leading him to retaliate. He "immediately gripped Jane Doe around her neck and positioned her on the floor in a prone position," placing his knee on the girl's neck and pushing her face into the floor. The suit further claims that "at various times, Guetschow repositioned himself in order to increase the amount of pressure that he was exerting against the back of Jane Doe's neck with his knee." Doe told Guetschow that she couldn't breathe but was ignored.
Eventually, Guetschow handcuffed the girl and arrested her—later urging his colleagues to press charges against the girl. While Doe was eventually charged with disorderly conduct, the lawyer for the girl's family, Drew DeVinney, told CNN that the issue was "resolved," and she was not convicted.
The complaint alleges that, due to the chokehold, Doe experienced a litany of injuries, including "a traumatic brain injury, cervical strain, and recurrent headaches." The incident also allegedly caused her to experience "mental trauma, and anxiety, including severe emotional distress, which has required Jane Doe to undergo mental health treatment and counselling and to change schools."
Ultimately, the complaint argues that Guetschow's actions constituted an illegal use of excessive force and unlawful arrest and, therefore, violated the girl's Fourth Amendment rights. "Shawn Guetschow's unreasonable and excessive use of force against Jane Doe was a cause of the injuries sustained by Jane Doe, including the violation of her constitutional rights, loss of liberty, past and future pain," the lawsuit states, adding that Guetschow "acted with malice or in reckless disregard of Jane Doe's federally protected rights."
The complaint also seeks to hold the local police department accountable for the incident, accusing it of being aware that Guetschow could become violent. "Guetschow's field performance [at a different police department] was marked as 'unacceptable' and he was described as 'emotional, panicked or loses their temper,'" the suit alleges. "The failure to adequately train and supervise off duty police officers, including Guetschow, caused Jane Doe injuries."
"She's humiliated, she's traumatized. Every day, I gotta hear 'daddy I don't want to go to school.' It breaks me because I wasn't there to help her," Jerrel Perez, the girl's father, said in a March press conference. "I want to see this officer get charged because if it was me or another parent or any adult that put their knee on a kid, that would be abuse."
It's unclear whether the lawsuit will be successful, particularly due to broad qualified immunity protections that largely shield police officers from accountability in civil rights cases. However, regardless of the outcome, the suit sends a clear message to the Kenosha Police Department—and any officers who might be inclined to use excessive force when breaking up schoolyard fights.
"This happened at a school," DeVinney said in a March press conference. "So let this be a learning opportunity to those responsible. If you commit an act of unlawful violence against one of our kids, the legal consequences will be steep."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Government schools is one of the reasons why we can’t have nice things.
Which is apparently why Democrats are so opposed to charter, private, and parochial schools.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, i’m now creating over $35,000 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link--------------------------------->>> http://Www.JobsRevenue.Com
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK. 🙂
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.SALARYBEZ.COM
The problem with charter schools is they want pick of the litter students but they want 'average' cost per student funding. The average kid cost about 1/2 the special needs kid to educate. So charter schools try to suck money from the public schools that they don't need.
Private schools seem to be invariably religious schools and well, the religious tend to be under educated in science (esp in the USA) which in turn means they want their offspring equally under educated. Young Earth, Creationalism, climate change happens by magic - it just happens, no cause, no effect.
Leads to people voting for Presidents that have no plan and no realistic expectations ("best health care plan EVER", "build a wall" etc. etc.)
Which teachers' union flunky told you that lie? Charter schools take the same kids that the traditional schools take. Charter schools have no more (or less) right to expel troublesome students than traditional schools.
Magnet schools have the right to be selective about their students. Magnet schools and charter schools are not the same thing.
You are equally obvious in your bigotry and ignorance about private schools generally and religious schools in particular.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.NETPAYFAST.COM
Right, some people might be able to have nice things while others can't, therefore no one should be allowed to have nice things.
THIS IS WHAT PROGRESSIVES ACTUALLY BELIEVE
You're talking about some people having nice things at the expense of others having anything at all, but flagrantly lying about it because you're a scumbag.
Your parents must cry every time they think of you.
●US Dollar Rain Earns upto $550 to $750 per day by google fantastic job oppertunity provide for our community pepoles who,s already using facebook to earn money 85000$ every month and more through facebook and google new project to create money at home withen few hours.Everybody can get this job now and start earning online by just open this link and then go through instructions to get started..........
See this article for more information————————>>>http://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
Here, here. I sho do wan summa yo nice things. I needs my reparations.
This is little different from all the laments that "kids get into knife fights" that went on in the Bryant case. Just refuse to get involved with them in their neighborhoods and let them cry to each other about the consequences of their victimhood mentality and refusing to instil any boundaries on the youth.
I'm thinking there were a few steps between the off-duty cop falling and him 'immediately' grabbing the girl by the throat then 'kneeling on her neck.' He could be a piece of shit, that doesn't mean she isn't as well, something that will no doubt never occur to reasonmag or camp.
Watch the video. She definitely shoved him into the table.
They may both be pieces of shit. One is 37, the other is a child. Get a clue, Hank.
One is 37, the other is a child.
You aren't considering the issue fully. Emma is a child. If I had to nominate someone, between Hank and Emma, for a "Has a clue" award, Hank starts out in the lead by leaps and bounds.
Like the 6 year old who shot his teacher?
Even in the (highly unlikely) event he's telling the truth, the fact remains: this pencildick got his ass kicked by a twelve yo girl. So, yeah, still gonna laugh at him.
"So let this be a learning opportunity to those responsible. If you commit an act of unlawful violence against one of our kids,
the legal consequences will be steepyou keep your job and if you lose in court the taxpayers foot the bill."ftfy
I can't help but think that there's a lot missing from this story.
Watch the video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdSDvq3l0mc
Sometimes I wonder, what exactly in a given instance would be the correct amount of force? It seems like some force in a lot of these situations is merited.
Pretty sure a full grown man putting a knee on the neck of a 12 yr old girl such that she has physical injuries including brain injuries would qualify as excessive.
The issue is probably the officer was never trained to subdue kids, let alone two kids.
Alleged brain injuries.
Much more troubling here is that none of the students stepped in to stop it.
Only then would I think that there is any hope for this country.
I disagree. I think the "Not my monkey, not my circus." and/or "Even if you initiate aggression to stop aggression, you're still liable for the aggression you started." are a couple of valuable lessons about modern day international geopolitics.
Which is it? Did he kneel on her neck, or put her in choke hold? I only ask because those are two very different things.
Which pays more?
The video link above is too short and grainy to really answer that question. It looks like the girl who was subdued (albeit in a clumsy manner) was the initiator of the attack. She continued attacking the other girl after the cop interfered and then attacked the cop as well. He ended it pretty quickly at that point and in hindsight we can argue whether the use of force was excessive (I tend towards saying she fucked around and found out.) The part I can't see is how long she was held on the ground and whether extra force was used when he could have gotten her back on her feet and restrained to then face the consequences
It's always off duty police that get charges like this ?
I ask that because I asked a friend who a school security officer (not police) about this case and his answer was, "We aren't allowed to do that, we break up fights all the time without chokeholds, kneeling on people, nor guns. They're kids, and I'm a grown (expletive) man; occasionally you will get a kid that is big for his age, but I'm a grown (expletive) man. We'd get fired in a heartbeat for some (expletive) like this. This is more frustration than necessity. Cops get frustrated quickly because kids don't automatically listen."
If he did something illegal, he should be arrested and tried.
We need independent review boards for police.
Good luck getting FOPs to agree to truly independent boards.
Ambulance chasers trying to extract money from tax-payers for the out of control behavior of their little brat.
Always remember when reading about lawsuits from the sole perspective of the Plaintiff’s attorney: everything their client did will be downplayed and sanitized, while everything the Defendant did will be the literal Holocaust.
In truth this girl was probably screaming bloody murder after having just assaulted another student, not following directions, swinging hands, cursing, resisting, knocking officers over and just generally being a public nuisance. She probably had to be pinned down for the safety of people around her.
A 12 year old ? Really ?
Ask the teacher who was shot by a six year old.
She should have armed herself.
Always remember when reading about lawsuits from the sole perspective of the Plaintiff’s attorney: everything their client did will be downplayed and sanitized, while everything the Defendant did will be the literal Holocaust.
And filtered through a journalistic source that's notorious for advancing "the victim fell down the stairs" narratives in earnest and, on at least one occasion, running with the narrative "shot, unarmed, in the back, while fleeing" when the footage from multiple angles clearly demonstrated "shot, in the chest, while armed running towards officers".
Again, the magazine spends probably between a quarter and half its budget talking about how borders are a figment of imagination and, upon hearing about Kyle Rittenhouse, a good number of the writers went with "He shouldn't have been in WI." Like the most dishonest abject fucking morons you could imagine.
There are still police in Kenosha? Yeesh