This Professor Was Fired for Her Political Speech. Now, She's Getting Her Job Back.
Collin College fired Suzanne Jones in 2021, after she voiced support for union activity and the removal of Confederate monuments.
A college professor fired for supporting union activity and the removal of Confederate statues will get her job back, following a settlement agreement reached on Thursday.
Collin College education professor Suzanne Jones was fired last year for her political speech—speech that her public university had no right to terminate her over. Jones sued, backed by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE). The parties reached a generous settlement this week, with the school promising to rehire Jones on a $230,000 two-year teaching contract, and pay her six-figure legal fees.
Collin College's firing of Suzanne Jones was one of the most blatant instances of outright politically motivated faculty censorship in recent years—and the hefty price paid by the school will hopefully serve as a warning for other colleges tempted to quash faculty rights.
According to a lawsuit filed in September 2021, Jones was told in January of that year that her teaching contract would not be renewed.
The lawsuit reports that the reason for her termination, according to the college's provost, was that "Jones had challenged Collin College's [COVID-19] reopening plans; and . . . Collin College asked Jones to remove references to Collin College in publicly accessible websites," on two separate occasions. According to FIRE, the first incident occurred after Jones signed her name and college affiliation on an open letter calling for the removal of Dallas Confederate statues in 2017. The second time occurred in 2020 when Jones "used the name of Collin College on a website associated with the Texas Faculty Association, a statewide faculty union Jones helped organize at Collin College."
After the college denied Jones' formal request to be reinstated, she filed suit. "When Jones exercised her freedom of expression, as detailed above, it was related to matters of public concern…that were outside the scope of her duties as a professor," Jones' attorneys wrote. "Collin College has not alleged that Jones' speech hindered operations or that her speech impeded her from carrying out her job. To the contrary, [the school's Vice President] described Jones as 'an excellent faculty member.'"
However, Jones managed to win her job back. In the settlement reached Thursday, Collin College officials agreed to rehire Jones on a two-year contract—and pay her hefty legal fees.
"This is a huge victory—not only for Suzanne but for every single professor around the country who hesitates to speak up because an administrator wants to silence them," FIRE attorney Greg H. Greubel said after the settlement was released. "Censorship is un-American. FIRE is proud to defend people of all political views who are punished simply for speaking their minds. And we're not stopping now."
Suzanne Jones was fired for obviously protected speech. Her recent legal victory will hopefully serve as a warning to other college administrations eager to punish faculty for their political activities.
"You can't fire professors simply for exercising their First Amendment rights," FIRE attorney Josh Bleisch said. Invoking the school's President, he continued, "How much more taxpayer money is President Matkin going to throw away before he gets the message? Lawsuits are our last resort when colleges prove unwilling to respect faculty and the First Amendment. But we won't stop until Matkin ends his regime of silence."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
OK, Emma, now do all the conservative and conservative-leaning professors who’ve been fired for voicing their concerns regarding the following:
– Mask and vaccine requirements
– Gender-affirming surgeries and grooming
– The control of the media by the Democrat Party
– Immigration and controlling the border
– Crime and Soros-backed prosecutors
– Critical Race Theory
Whenever someone doesn’t talk about something to your satisfaction, that means they maliciously support the opposite of whatever it is you believe. All disagreement is rooted in evil and bad intentions.
If you write an article lamenting the treatment of a person while having ignored that same treatment meted out to other persons –or worse, having SUPPORTED that treatment being meted out to other persons then it is not surprising to be called out on one’s hypocrisy.
That’s exactly what I’m saying. The author deliberately and with bad intentions ignored what you feel is important. That means they have the worst possible stance on whatever it is they didn’t talk about.
I am making 80 US dollars per hr. to complete some internet services from home. I did not ever think it would even be achievable , however my confidant mate got $13k only in four weeks, easily doing this best assignment and also she convinced me to avail.
For more detail visit this article… http://www.Profit97.com
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot (psr-08) of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
…
Just open the link————————————–>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> ???.????????.???
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> ???.????????.???
No, she held her clearly partisan tongue until FIRE litigated a case to her liking. She made absolutely no reference to other cases litigated by FIRE. She’s just another pseudo libertarian Dem sycophant on the Reason payroll, and an embarrassingly transparent one at that. Criticism is valid.
For some reason I keep getting logged out, as a result I saw sarcs comment, as he is muted when I am logged in. I see muting him was correct as he is still a broken retard that should kill himself.
Why it is obvious like you say. If you are not in the Trump Cult life has no purpose.
OK, whatever, SoCkSoCkPeDo.
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> ???.????????.???
I’m pleased to see this spreading. 😀
To say this “was one of the most blatant instances of outright politically motivated faculty censorship in recent years” is just retarded. It feels very much like FIRE took a chunk of their settlement, donated to the Foundation, and got Reason to write some promo material for them.
Rather than, you know, a libertarian magazine pointing out that “Muh Privut YOUNEEVIRSITEES!” handing out six-figure salaries and settlements to defendants in the background of student loan forgiveness isn’t exactly a win for anybody. Or an objective reporter noting that a college/employer firing someone for using the employer’s brand to promote a cause the brand doesn’t support isn’t a clear or broad 1A issue that libertarians should be celebrating.
*eye roll, golf clap* yay FIRE’s lawyers. Way to go making money off taxpayers in support of tearing down of both statues and employer’s right to exert ownership of their brand. Way to go returning to the power to the most oppressed workers in all of history. Socio-politically active, 6-figure-earning white women. This victory totally isn’t literally AWFL cheerleading. You totallly aren’t a shitty modern rehash of the ACLU. yay. whoop-ee.
It was not HER free speech she got fired for. It was her presenting HER free speech as being offical speech of the college. That IS after all what is taking place when you put your employers name and logo under your own.
FIRE and Reason are full of shit,. “was one of the most blatant instances of outright politically motivated faculty censorship in recent years” is a full-on flat-assed lie.
She should have been fired. FIRE has lost their way. Reason is just demonstrating how lame they are again.
I can’t speak for ITL, but for myself, I haz disappoint in the lack of Boaf Sidez Do It! in this particular matter.
So who got fired for voicing their concern about “Soros backed prosecutors?”
A) What collegiate staff or faculty expressed such concerns?
B) Did someone want to make the counter-case that Open Society contributions to DA races across the country (often in the range of 10X what had previously been spent in such races) does NOT make them “Soros-backed”?
Or were you trying to avoid making a point?
Let’s all get behind (steady, ITL) the consistent, viewpoint-neutral application of faculty free speech restrictions, shall we?
Works for me.
Yes, Shrike, we know what you get behind.
Amazing! I’ve been making $85 every hour since i started freelancing over the internet half a year ago… I work from home several hours daily and do basic work i get from this company that i stumbled upon online… I am very happy to share this work opportunity to you… It’s definetly the best job i ever had…
Check it out here……….>>> onlinecareer1
“You can’t fire professors simply for exercising their First Amendment rights,”
Unless you are a two-bit conservative school like Hillsdale or Bob Jones University where groupthink is locked in and no one is allowed to voice dissent.
GIT BACK ON THE GOP PLANTATION, BOY!
“BOY”??? You are a fucking pedo, literally.
A few years back you posted kiddy porn to this site, and your initial handle was banned. The link below details all the evidence surrounding that ban. A decent person would honor that ban and stay away from Reason. Instead you keep showing up, acting as if all people should just be ok with a kiddy-porn-posting asshole hanging around. Since I cannot get you to stay away, the only thing I can do is post this boilerplate.
https://reason.com/2022/08/06/biden-comforts-the-comfortable/?comments=true#comment-9635836
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, a TDS-addled shit pile and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
“This is a huge victory—not only for Suzanne but for every single professor around the country who hesitates to speak up because an administrator wants to silence them,” FIRE attorney Greg H. Greubel
Fire and Greg mean well but this is just another rule which will be enforced in a politically discriminatory manner as long as the left controls our institutions. That is what needs to change.
In this case, I’d get rid of the “institution” in question altogether. Collin College is a public school. Is running colleges & universities a legitimate function of government? No, it isn’t. Shut it down!
Since the institution does exist and isn’t going away you might as well have said you believe we should crap unicorns and then sing kumbaya together and everything will be fine.
You assume that it’s possible to revert the process here (i.e., the process of “the left [taking] controls [of] our institutions”). I posit that it isn’t. Which leaves us with my proposal.
Yeah, I would be a little more impressed if the reinstatement involved one of the dozens (hundreds?) of conservative professors fired or otherwise ousted, and not the one liberal canned for saying what most college faculty profess as religious faith.
This woman will now take up the God’s work of failing every conservative student who takes her class and getting every conservative colleague fired.
Do you think she should have been fired?
Collin College is a public school. Is running colleges & universities a legitimate function of government? No, it isn’t. Which means it shouldn’t exist in the first place.
(But what if it’d been a private school? I’d say: it’s up to the school. Your school — your rules. Fire whoever you like, for whatever reason you like. That’s the libertarian position.)
One may argue about whether government should run universities, but given that they do, therefore you agree she shouldn’t have been fired.
And you’re right – had Collin been private they would indeed have had the right to fire her. Unless, of course, her right to free speech was part of her contract of employment. FWIW I can conceive that an academic might well try to have this as part of their private contract, and why not?
Because no employer would agree to such terms, you idiot.
Hey, not seen you around much, you retarded fuckwit! Good to see you back.
You’re wrong. If an employer really wants a particular person as an employee – or wants to mark itself out as a better employer than a competitor without paying more – it could readily add that as a contract term.
One may argue about whether government should run universities, but given that they do, therefore you agree she shouldn’t have been fired.
…
Unless, of course, her right to free speech was part of her contract of employment.
This is so embarrassingly retarded you should be ashamed.
“Dear Susanne,
We owe you one right to free speech.
Thanks,
Collins College
P.S.- Good luck forming your union and fuck the right to the free association rights of the taxpayers we collect from!”
Yes, she should have been fired.
It was not HER private speech. She put the schools name and logo under her name. Have any of the “legal eagles” on this shit show remember what it means to be a “company agent”. And yes, it applies to non-profits and to governmental bodies.
This illustrates several problems with statist judicial systems.
* Her attorney fees were $150,000. This is ridiculous; it puts justice out of reach of 99% of the population.
* Loser pays would improve that, if it included all costs, not just attorney fees — lost wages (had to be explicitly included here), research, hired help, etc. Much more relevant to criminal prosecutions than this case, but it still prevents ordinary people getting justice.
* Too damned slow. If the firing had been properly conducted with the proper legal analysis, the college should have been ready to defend their action immediately. This was so obviously wrong that the professor should have been ready to prosecute within days, allowing for finding a lawyer, preliminary talks with her bosses, etc. It should not have taken two years. What are people supposed o do for two years while waiting for the legal system to get its ass in gear — live off welfare? Savings? Friends and family? No, in reality, most people don’t even try to get justice, they just find another job. Mission accomplished.
Your reform suggestions make sense, except…you get to “Result A” and it’s “Let’s make it easier for people to sue each other!”.
Damn, I just don’t know about that end…
Nope. Unless the perpetrators of the firing debacle have to pay the costs personally out of their own pockets this will not serve as a warning to them or to anyone else in a similar position in other educational institutions. Next question.
I’m a little curious, is allowing a professors contract to expire and opting not to renew it the same as firing them? Functionally they don’t work for the University anymore in either case, but it seems like allowing an employee’s contract to expire isn’t really the same thing as being fired to me.
I’ve done contract work in the past, and having the contract renewed is just about never a certainty. Then again, I’ve never worked for a University directly before either.
Yeah, there’s not much detail here. It may be tenure, it may be contract clauses requiring renewal, we will never know unless we want to download court decisions and wade through legalese.
If a contract requires mandatory renewal it’s a pretty bizarre contract since you can list out a contract for just about any length of time, so a mandatory renewal might as well just have a longer duration in the first place.
I don’t have much opinion on this particular case, it’s just weird since a non-renewal of presumably a short term multiyear contract isn’t usually cause for a lawsuit. In this case presumably it was, but the why isn’t clear. It even states her new contract is for something like two years, so presumably that was the type of contract she was already at the end of when they didn’t renew.
I can imagine a contract which requires renewal if several milestones are met — number of publications, student reviews, outside funding brought in.
I haven’t really looked into this, and the article isn’t really big on details, but there’s a lot gameplaying in the way faculty are hired. Getting an actual faculty position is really, really hard and very coveted. Most people who actually teach classes are contract employees who don’t really get benefits, have no career track, aren’t part of the academic senate and aren’t part of the faculty union. The positions tend to be thought of as semi-permanent, however, and the contracts are simply re-executed periodically without fanfare.
Which is so much as to say that one could conceivably argue in such a context that the renewal of the contract was expected and the failure to renew the contract, particularly without cause for complaint regarding the service, can be viewed as a wrongful termination.
I dunno about professors, but at the lowly staff level, I worked both direct and contract jobs for the University of New Mexico, and in the contract position, they just let me go and that was that.
“We have opted not to renew your contract.”
The end, as they say.
Not quite on point, but many years ago a colleague was hired on a 2-year contract by a Japanese bank in London, which was very different from regular Japanese bank practice. At the end of the two years, his Japanese boss asked very hesitantly, “what is London practice at end of contract?” to which my colleague replied, “oh, you just renew for another two years”. The boss smiled gratefully and promptly renewed his contract.
The college is forced to reinstate an authoritarian Karen professor for violating free speech rights, which, given her positions, she likely does not respect for her opponents. Yay.
Dig the crazy reframe! You been getting lessons from Frank Luntz? Or just being a douche?
She can be fired wrongfully, and still be an ffing bitch.
It’s amazing to me that there are still so many confederate monuments in the south. After WWII all the nazi monuments were taken down or destroyed. How do the losers of the civil war get to keep their monuments to redneck slaveowners?
The more I think about it the more I come to realize that reconstruction ended about 150 years too soon.
From a reader’s letter to the Wall Street Journal:
After the Civil War, a conscious decision was made to bring the South back into the fold. The military occupation of the South was quickly ended, they were given full political participation rights, their Civil War dead were treated with equal honors to those of the Northern dead. This wasn’t all that odd, and certainly not “atrocious.” It allowed the South to rejoin the nation on equal footing, with their dignity intact.
Less than a century earlier, in France, the Revolutionary government, also concerned about ending “inequality and injustice,” took a different approach. After they defeated the insurrection in the Vendée, they killed all the rebels, including the ones that surrendered. They then proceeded to wipe out the entire population of the Vendée — men, women, and children. How’s that for “atrocious”…
Part of it was a political decision to avoid a continuation of the Civil War by guerrilla tactics and terrorism, which was only partly successful. There was also that sfter some time, the North became disillusioned with Reconstruction, much like trying to nation build in Iraq and Afghanistan in our own time.
Recall that most monuments were erected much later, intending not merely to commemorate the Confederacy but to remind the nigrahs who is still running things down heah, and don’t you forget it, boy!
https://www.splcenter.org/sites/default/files/com_whose_heritage_timeline_print.pdf
Quoting SPLC? Pathetic.
Is the chart wrong?
But that line of argument is against you, it’s taking a statement and evaluating it on imputed motives. Very nasty indeed.
“Nasty”? Oh you poor little schneeflocke
Around here the most prominent monument is a statue of Chief Blackhawk a warrior Indian ultimately defeated by the Illinois Militia. In fact Blackhawk is probably the most popular street name for a hundred miles. It was meant to honor the memory of his valor. It used to be pretty common for the victors to honor their fallen enemies.
Well I’m glad no one tore Blackwawk Down!
The letter writer clearly had no idea of the historical and political contexts at play in the decisions. Instead he/she went all the way to the point of judgement with no deeper analysis than “How does that make me FEEL?”
How fucking shallow.
Wow, Peanuts. Big News.
wingnut.com is reporting that Biden will dump Kam-Kam on Monday and replace her with Michelle Obama.
Huuuuge.
Oh yay. An aristocratic appointment.
If it is not high order bullshit.
It’s always interesting to see which comment section agitators are assigned to each of these posts. You’ll rarely get all of them at once, but the ones that sick around (Like, in this instance, SPB2) enjoy attempting to reply to everyone in an attempt to break up the discourse or just start their own multiple posts saying essentially the same thing.
Collin College’s firing of Suzanne Jones was one of the most blatant instances of outright politically motivated faculty censorship in recent years
No, I strongly doubt that. I mean, for fuck sakes, we just went through two years of COVID firings and deplatformings. And if you wanna go international, meaning Canada, this one probably doesn’t even percolate to the top half of politically motivated censorship.
—and the hefty price paid by the school will hopefully serve as a warning for other colleges tempted to quash faculty rights.
Oberlin still hasn’t apologized, despite getting clapped with $25 million.
“You can’t fire professors simply for exercising their First Amendment rights,” FIRE attorney Josh Bleisch said.
And by the way, while FIRE is doing good work here, yes you can fire a professor for exercising their First Amendment Rights, and he knows it.
This is the ultimate Man Bites Dog story. A professor gets fired (well, her temporary 2-year contract was not renewed) for being TOO LIBERAL?
What I take away from this is that most colleges are so leftist now that there simply are no nontenured professors even taking the chance of espousing any conservative beliefs, because they know they’d be gone in an instant.
Amazing! I’ve been making $85 every hour since i started freelancing over the internet half a year ago… I work from home several hours daily and do basic work i get from this company that i stumbled upon online… I am very happy to share this work opportunity to you… It’s definetly the best job i ever had…
Check it out here……….>>> onlinecareer1
Next time, vett your faculty applicants with a bit more care, Collins College. Stupid is as stupid hires.
How amazingly odd that a teacher cites First Amendment and not academic integrity. That makes me DISLIKE her.
Maybe she feels guilty for using her teacher status to cover her motives.
FIRE is not doing good work here. They didn’t win the case, they got a settlement. They got a settlement from a public university in the background of student loan forgiveness. They got an AWFL reinstated after her contract expired because AWFL’s have a right to work and use their employer’s IP for their own purposes including unionizing against the employer. Reason and FIRE aren’t framing the facts that way, but those are the facts by their own telling.
The specificity of the case, the narrowness of the victory, and the selective interpretation/framing of the facts overall… this isn’t/wasn’t an accident. Whether they made a mistake up front and didn’t see college administration costs rising and are just continuing to steamroll with the retcon or consistently and deliberately retconned this from the beginning and throughout is unclear, but immaterial.
And, to be clear; if Jordan Peterson set up a speech using the University of Toronto’s logo in a manner they didn’t like, not even to unionize or call for tearing down statues, even just a poor demonstration on how to make PB&J sandwiches, and they let him know that, at the end of his contract, it would not be renewed… FIRE could get fucked in their defense of Jordan Peterson in that case too.
[emphasis added]
[emphasis added]
[emphasis added]
Yay! We got her renewed for a 2-yr. contract so she can go on supporting her public educators’ union! 2 more years! 2 more years! Fuck the taxpayers’ free association rights, we won… well at least got a university to agree to the price on a teacher’s 1A rights! 2 more years! 2 more years!
https://www.ratemyprofessors.com/professor?tid=642329
I like this blog for it’s rich content. You are also welcome to our academic services such as The Ontological Argument and War on Terror and many more. We offer all these on our essay writing website.
Hmmm, I am all about her free speech. On the other hand she should not be able to put her employers name under hers for political speech. She is obviously not speaking for her employer.
They had the right to terminate her for using the school’s name under hers. It implied falsely, that she was representing not only herself, but the college as well.
If there’s one problem with US higher education, it’s not enough liberals in the academic ranks. Glad that is being addressed.