Biden's Giveaways Largely Benefit Well-Off Americans
Perhaps not coincidentally, the makeup of the Democratic Party has recently been trending toward high-earning professionals.
During his campaign for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, Joe Biden repeatedly insisted that his primary goal as president would be to help the struggling American middle class. "Ordinary middle-class Americans built America," he declared during a June 2019 Democratic primary debate. Under President Donald Trump's policies, he said, "too many people who are in the middle class and who are poor have the bottom fall out."
In defining the "middle class" and the "poor," a good place to start is the median household income. In 2020, the year before Biden became president, the U.S. median was about $67,000, down from about $69,000 the previous year. The poor presumably make less than that, and people in the "middle" class, particularly those who feel the economic bottom falling out beneath them, presumably don't make much more.
As president, Biden's attention has often been elsewhere. Under Biden, Democrats consistently have focused their energies on policies designed to benefit households with stable employment and six-figure annual incomes—not the super rich, but the affluent upper-middle class.
Shortly after taking office, for example, the Biden administration defended its decision to send $1,400 pandemic relief checks to families making up to $150,000 annually. The checks were part of the American Rescue Plan, a $2 trillion package of handouts to Democratic interest groups that Democrats pushed through Congress on partisan votes shortly after taking control of the House, the Senate, and the White House.
"We have to take care of people who are hurting," Biden told a group of House Democrats as the legislation was taking shape in February 2021. Around the same time, Jen Psaki, then the White House press secretary, defended Biden's insistence that the checks go to six-figure earners. Biden, she said during a press conference, "believes a married couple—let's say they're in Scranton, just for the sake of argument; one is working as a nurse, the other as a teacher—making $120,000 a year should get a check."
A two-earner family with stable jobs and good employment prospects making $120,000 a year might be middle class. But such a family in Scranton, Pennsylvania, would have been making nearly twice the 2020 U.S. median and more than five times the local median household income of $23,103. It is hard to believe the sort of household Psaki described was truly "hurting."
Other Biden policies have delivered benefits to families with even higher earnings. The American Rescue Plan included a temporary expansion of the subsidies offered through the Affordable Care Act, the health coverage law also known as Obamacare. That expansion spent $34 billion over two years to boost the law's subsidies for private insurance. The law originally offered subsidies to families making up to 400 percent of the poverty line, or about $106,000 annually in 2021. Biden's legislation changed the formula for determining the income limit for the subsidies. The new cutoffs varied by locality but in some cases would allow families making as much as $350,000 annually to qualify for insurance subsidies worth more than $20,000 a year.
A $350,000 household income would put any family in the top 3 percent of earners in the United States. So much for the struggling middle class and the poor.
Similarly, as Democrats were debating Biden's Build Back Better spending package in 2021, many blue state Democrats, including Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D–N.Y.), insisted that the deal include an adjustment to the state and local tax deduction. That deduction mainly benefits high earners in blue states who pay high income and property taxes.
This year, Democrats have pushed Biden to forgive vast swaths of student loan debt through executive action. These benefits would flow primarily to upper-income professionals with advanced degrees. While no action had been taken at press time, The Washington Post reported in May that the president was considering an income cap for forgiveness of up to $300,000 annually.
Perhaps not coincidentally, the makeup of the Democratic Party has recently been trending toward high-earning, highly educated professionals. In 2020, Biden won 60 percent of college-educated voters, according to Pew Research Center data, and more-educated counties trended Democratic. These high-earning degree holders may be ordinary Democrats, but they are not "ordinary middle-class Americans."
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Biden Comforts the Comfortable."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
LOL
“Biden’s Giveaways Largely Benefit Well-Off Americans”
Perhaps not coincidentally, Koch-funded libertarians wanted Biden to win. 🙂
#OBLsFirstLaw
#VoteDemocratToHelpTheRich
Also not coincidentally…
In 2022 Democrats have raised the minimum wage by: $0.00 / hour
In 2022 Reason.com benefactor Charles Koch’s net worth has increased by: $6.62 billion
#BillionairesForBiden
I am a student and I do work part time on this website to meet my needs. One who is jobless or want to earn more money for himself, (buc-50) should must try this because this is really very easy and less time consuming and also advantageous without investing any amount.
.
SEE MORE:>>>> https://workofferweb24.pages.dev/
That’s actually a good thing for working Americans.
It’s a good thing for all people who pay for their life needs and wants with their own money.
I am creating eighty North American nation greenbacks per-hr. to finish some web services from home. I actually have not ever thought adore it would even realisable but my friend mate got $27k solely in four weeks simply doing this best csv14 assignment and conjointly she convinced Maine to avail. Look further details going this web-page.
.
———->>> https://smartpay241.blogspot.com
No need to raise the minimum wage now. Burger flippers at In-n-Out start at 19 bucks an hour now, with a 401K.
Mo biden is worse than all the other bad presidents combined, this political hack has done nothing
since he first got elected, than get re elected, now he is an ass kisser and a bully, he is why democracy was doomed to fail
C’mon, it’s not like people with 5-figure incomes are making lots of 6-figure donations to the DNC.
Yeah, but those 5-figure (and 3 and 4-figure income people) are necessary for protest mobs, votes, and photo-ops. At least if the have the desired politics and appearance.
I am making 80 US dollars per-hr to complete some internet services from home.I have not ever thought like it would even achievable however my confidant mate got $27k only in four weeks easily doing this best assignment and also she convinced me to avail.
Look extra details going this web-page… https://oldprofits.blogspot.com/
What better way to stratify our society?
Glad to see Democrats returning to their (southern) roots. A self-declared “intellectual” elite upper class that tells a bunch of dark-skinned people how to live–but certainly does not want to get too close.
“Perhaps not coincidentally, the makeup of the Democratic Party has recently been trending toward high-earning professionals”
An entire article just to say OBL is right! Seriously reason read the comments. Ken was better than all of you, overt is good, Elvis is real better then all of you. And obl a parody account is exactly how all of the reason writers portray (expose? ) themselves
^no lies detected, +1000
What happened with Ken? I haven’t seen him here for ages.
Trump riff-raff chased him away.
It had nothing to do with Trump you lying pedophile.
Ken went full Ukrainian apologist when the war started and didn’t like the pushback he got.
You Trump Cultists are pro-Putin like he is.
Putin is the good guy to you.
Nobody believes your lies.
Who’s pro-Putin, Shrike? Caught a little neo-McCarthyist fever, huh. “If you’re against war with Russia yur a dirty Red!”
Nope, I would break Putin’s neck as quickly as I would break your’s.
You riden the biden ?
What do you mean by “Ukrainian apologist”?
I’m just summarizing off memory, so I might not be completely accurate, but basically his opinion was that Ukraine was completely innocent of any bad behavior before the invasion, ignoring some of the actions they had taken in Donbas against Russian speaking citizens. And any criticism of the Ukrainian government meant you were a Putin puppet.
Thanks! Well, that’s sad… Ukraine clearly did some bad stuff too against their ethnic minorities, and if we’re being frank, they’re pretty much the “same” as Russians. Looks, language, level of corruption, mentality, etc… no meaningful difference, especially if we’re squinting… but tell that to the sheepfolk who are always supporting The Current Thing dictated by The Party. Then again, it’s also true that Russia did initiate the actual large-scale hostilities, and they ought to have practiced some restraint, especially considering that the conflict is hurting them (as in the avg Russians) also. Even if they had actual geopolitical grievances, and even though Ukraine’s (and the EU’s and The Party’s) policies were detrimental to the status quo (they were pushing NATO and EU membership despite knowing that it’ll anger the Russians).
Meanwhile, our Insider Trader-in-Chief is doing her best to jump start the China-Taiwan conflict…
Ken got in some scraps with Nardz about Ukraine.
They both called each other “fascist”.
Everyone told them to knock it off.
Nardz shrugged it off but Ken got mad and left.
I miss his comments and hope he comes back.
Thanks ML! That’s sad… hope he returns soon. His comments were always superb (except for his stance on Section 230).
He put more time into them then I’m willing to.
Which was and is his choice, yes. I’m also busy most of the time so I don’t comment frequently.
I never called Ken fascist.
He said I was a Kremlin stooge/propagandist.
I said he was shilling for global totalitarians and was presenting State Department propaganda as fact. I wasn’t saying his ideology was global totalitarianism, just that his position on Ukraine/Russia was 100% aligned with them.
The difference was that he said all of my opinions were just Kremlin propaganda, though I extensively explained the logic and values which led me to my conclusions.
Ultimately, Ken could never let go of or change a theory that he’d made up his mind on. I’d already gotten under his skin for pointing out that his analysis of the Suleimani hit was, while not unreasonable initially, waaaaaaaaaaay off as proven by what actually happened. For some reason, it took Ken well over a year to finally concede that maybe, just maybe, his analysis didn’t come through.
I gave him similar pushback on Ukraine, and he just snapped. I would’ve continued mostly ignoring him, each of us making separate arguments, but he wouldn’t stop defaming me and stalking all my posts. So yes, I responded on occasion.
But Ken was so rabid that he stopped writing much of anything else, which provoked others to call him out. I think that (and the neokeNN nickname, which I am somewhat proud of) was too much for Ken, and he ghosted.
It’s a shame. I’ve gotten into arguments with plenty of others here about Ukraine/Russia, but it’s not the be-all-end-all of commentary. I wish Ken would get over his weird fixation on it and come back. Really hope he didn’t actually join the reddit brigade that went over there…
I see, thanks for disclosing your side of the story. I’m glad that you don’t hold any grudge against Ken.
I’m thinking he got fed up with arguing with sarc, nardz, and a few other regulars. A shame honestly, because he has good takes even when I’ve disagreed
If he was fed up with arguing with me, I gave him plenty of opportunity to not do so. He’s the one who continually sought out my posts and responded to them. I mostly let his posts stand on their own.
Thank you 🙂
Perhaps not coincidentally, the makeup of the Democratic Party has recently been trending toward high-earning, highly educated professionals. In 2020, Biden won 60 percent of college-educated voters, according to Pew Research Center data, and more-educated counties trended Democratic.
Why is this happening?
Trumpism is low-brow white-trash politics. That is their target audience. Naturally that sets up the corollary that Democrats appeal to the more educated.
Part of it was Dubya and his disastrous eight years. Obama was the anti-Bush president and educated people saw that.
Bush-to-Trump was the continuum that cemented the GOP as the low-brow white-trash party.
“Why is this happening?”
Even better, why are you here? A few years back you posted kiddy porn to this site, and your initial handle was banned. Rather than follow the will of Reason’s staff, you resurrected that identity and continue to post here. A decent person would realize how abhorrent this behavior is, burn the SPB identity and return under some new handle. While that wouldn’t change your despicable appetites, it would at least respect a community’s wishes to not mix with pedophiles. But since you have no shame, the only thing I and others can do is point out your past behavior rather than converse with you.
When you QAnon liars reveal how deranged you are it turns off educated fence sitters.
QAnon is ugly. So you Alex Jones types only cut into the Con Man’s small pool of voters.
Trump lost two popular votes. Bring that pig-boy back and lose again. Go ahead, Mr GOP.
Turn yourself in for your crimes against children.
Wow! Mr. Buttplug is back! So glad you could take time off from spending all your #BidenBoom money on yachts and mansions to tell the Peanuts how well things are going. 🙂
Can you believe this latest wingnut.com lie? They’re actually saying the Biden economy meets the widely used definition of “recession.” Have you thought of a clever all-caps slogan to shut that down? You know, like your earlier #DefendBidenAtAllCosts classics SLOPPY PULLOUT or HAPERINFLATION?
#LibertariansForBiden
#BestEconomyEver
That was funny when the pedo was mocking people for saying inflation was happening.
How’d that work out, pedo?
Mr. Buttplug is the most knowledgeable economics expert in this comments section. He’s Warren Buffett Junior. He’s the Oracle of Dogdick Georgia. If he says spittin’ tobaccy is literally the only item that’s gotten more expensive since January 2021, it must be true.
#InflationIsAWingnutMyth
*not myth, conspiracy theory
C’mon, OBL, you’re more plugged in than that!
Can you believe this latest wingnut.com lie? They’re actually saying the Biden economy meets the widely used definition of “recession.”
Hmmmm.
Full Employment Recession
Fake Recession
0.9% Recession
I guess I prefer 0.9% Recession.
It’s like it almost didn’t happen.
Anyway the real recession is coming in 2023. Biden is fucked then.
Remember when you denied inflation was happening? Yeah, that made you look really stupid. But you have no shame, so you pretend it didn’t happen.
I’m looking forward to the next quarter results to see how his excuses morph.
“Full Employment Recession”
Never in the history of employment statistics worldwide have so many people been removed from the job seeking stats without having found jobs, but just look at him pretend.
You know who else boasted full employment before his Downfall?
Ulysses Grant?
Odd that the only place I’ve heard of QAnon is from the left press. As a conservative, I do not know a damned thing they believe in outside of what NPR claims they believe in. And given how much I trust NPR, that is not worth much.
I don’t know all of what they believe, but I think one of their “conspiracies” is that the ruling elite have an issue with sexual behavior involving children. Crazy, right?
I’ve heard of the pedophilia part of the theory and I’m hard pressed to dispute it.
Ludicrous. Imagine accusing President Biden of being a pedophile?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XqF4wA-dco
He’s just being super friendly to all those little girls.
Jeffrey who?… Shut up!
Notice that SPB’s only defense is to accuse me of being QAnon. Because he knows that every time someone calls him on posting kiddy porn here, he eventually has to reckon with people being able to give very specific links…such as this one where he admits to being banned:
https://reason.com/2019/02/26/bernie-sanders-cnn-townhall-foreign-poli/?comments=true#comment-7690893
You can actually go to the wayback archive and see the articles that he was commenting as of 12-4, and where they have scrubbed his name out as of 12-6. Because when he posted his kiddy-porn links, they went on a mass erasing spree, deleting his posts for days before and after the incident (in addition to nuking the actual article where he had posted the stuff).
But sure, we are totally the qannon people here.
Damning.
I admit I lost my email address password. Big fucking deal.
You idiots call everyone who doesn’t fellate Donnie a “pedo”. No one cares. I don’t care.
And you stupid Motherfuckers when a host bans you they do it by IP address.
Now you are lying. You specifically admitted to being banned and tried blaming it on a “conservative IT” person’s editorial decision. But that’s what you do- lie about what is there.
I’m sure you will also deny that on 12/4/2018 you were posting in articles, and by 12/6/2018 your posts had been completely scrubbed from site. Unfortunately for you, the wayback machine remembers.
https://web.archive.org/web/20181205130733/http://reason.com/blog/2018/12/04/government-shutdown-avoided-again-reason#comment
That’s you posting on 12/4
And that’s the same article on 12/6, after your name has been scrubbed:
https://web.archive.org/web/20181206190522/http://reason.com/blog/2018/12/04/government-shutdown-avoided-again-reason#comment
Wow, sure as shit, that’s the same thread except for pedo’s posts being deleted.
I wonder what kind of squirming he’s going to try to explain that.
Oh, and here is OBL referencing your banning, here- specifically calling out that all of your posts have been removed.
https://web.archive.org/web/20181225135006/https://reason.com/blog/2018/12/24/brickbat-the-last-place-you-look#comment_7608665
So tell me SPB: Are you going to stick by the “I lost my email address” story? Really? Does Reason commonly identify people who lost their account credentials, and then scrub their posts?
Please.
We know why all your posts were scrubbed. You know why. We were there at the time, and we saw. So stop making up shit, and scurry away again for another couple of weeks until you think I and others have stopped paying attention.
Top notch asskicking. I’m looking forward to watching him squirm out of this.
It appears he’s gone with the run away and come back another day and pretend this never happened approach.
He’ll come back under his new SRG handle, but won’t bother to stop using the same writing tics.
You are a coarse, vulgar peasant arent you
Omegalul, of course his screenname was porn related (moneyshot).
Wow! Digging through stuff from that link, as well as the wayback links, is a pretty dark rabbit hole… It takes a special kind of person to stay on a website, and making aggressive comments after that level of being outed as a sicko…. Yeesh!
You sound rabid. Let’s assume you are and put you down. You’re a child molester, so it’s what you deserve anyway.
You riden the biden ?
So far the only effective treatment for TDS is the anti psychotic medication thorazaine
But you must take the initiative on seeking help
Hey the pedofile is back!
Trump appealed to the working class because the Dems abandoned them. Polls in 2016 showed that illegal immigration was the number one issue for voters nationally, so he made that the centerpiece of his campaign, while most Repub candidates downplayed it and Dems took the anti-populist (read anti-majority) position with every primary contender raising their hands to give free healthcare to illegal immigrants.
Shrike, like Tony and Mike, hates the working class. Even when they were voting for Democrats, their disdain for the working class proles was palpable.
I’m just scared of stupid people in large groups.
My ultimate goal is to eradicate the working class. In my utopian framework, there will be no class of humans who work, and they certainly won’t be society’s sacrificial offering to Wal-Mart.
While my preference is no handouts, Mr Suderman is stealing a base with his first example of the $1400 handout. Yes, Biden gave the handout to families upwards of $150,000 income- but it wasn’t instead of giving money to lower income classes. That is very different from the desire to cancel loans for college students.
As it is, the biggest difference between being in one of the lower income Quintiles and one of the Higher Quintiles is the number of adults contributing in the home. The average number of earners in the bottom 20% of american households is .4. The average number of earners in the top 20% is 2. And among the middle (3rd) and upper middle (4th) quintiles, a household will have either 2 earning adults or one adult taking care of the home while another adult earns.
A $1400 check sent to a lower income quintile home is probably giving them $1400 per adult in that house. Sending it to an upper-class home is likely paying $700 per earner in the household. So, this program is definitely favoring the poor far more than the affluent.
Again, it is pretty noxious to me that this program exists at all. But in fact it is bad because- like many forms of welfare and especially those forms that target households- it tends to do the opposite of what Suderman accuses, and subsidizes behaviors that are highly correlated with lower income.
A $1400 check sent to a lower income quintile home is probably giving them $1400 per adult in that house. Sending it to an upper-class home is likely paying $700 per earner in the household. So, this program is definitely favoring the poor far more than the affluent.
Both you and Suderman are wrong on this.
https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/coronavirus/assistance-for-american-families-and-workers/economic-impact-payments
The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (American Rescue Plan), enacted in early March 2021, provided Economic Impact Payments of up to $1,400 for eligible individuals or $2,800 for married couples filing jointly, plus $1,400 for each qualifying dependent, including adult dependents.
Normally, a taxpayer will qualify for the full amount of Economic Impact Payment if they have AGI of up to $75,000 for singles and married persons filing a separate return, up to $112,500 for heads of household, and up to $150,000 for married couples filing joint returns and surviving spouses. Payment amounts are reduced for eligible individuals with AGI above those levels.
Then it actually makes Suderman’s point. It does target the affluent. Had it been as he described, it would be a standard welfare payment with the complaints I noted. But since it is targeted at individuals instead of households, Suderman’s point stands (even if his facts were wrong).
You’re welcome.
The problem with the handouts (not gonna lie, I absolutely took mine and used it to pay off some debt and a small family vacation), besides the inflationary aspects of printing that much money out of thin air, is that the overwhelming majority of the money didn’t actually get spent on households. Instead it was spent on states that mismanaged their pension funds and well connected corporations. Much like the bailouts in 2009.
It’s almost like Democrats don’t actually care about everyday people and instead only care about their corporatist cronies.
This article demonstrates that a lot of money supposedly directed by the Biden administration to people who are “hurting” are not hurting very much. It does’t demonstrate that most of the money is going to such people. There’s nothing wrong with a little “accuracy in media”, Pete.
A strong middle class is the backbone of a Democratic society and there is nothing wrong with government priorities directed to supporting the middleclass, rather than the wealthiest. I agree that benefits have been too generous, but politics influences the way these benefits are structured. It is not different from giving a tax cut to all when in fact the cut benefits the wealthiest the most. It is worth noting that the lower middleclass also benefits from Biden’s policies and so the goal of supporting the middle class is being met.
Hardly. The Democrats are now supportive of one of the most regressive policies known to man (“forgiving college loan debt” — which means high school grads get to pay for the debt of post-grad degree holders).
These things are not accidental. They are VERY intentional.
And what about the graduate student who parents had just high school educations but dreamed of more for their children? The article is correct in that some benefits have been too generous, but the focus on the middle class is correct.
Except they are not. Their base is high income earners and THEY are who they worry about.
It’s why they give no shits about gas prices and insist on people buying dramatically more expensive electric cars.
Both gas prices and electric cars prices are dropping. I can also buy an electric car for a similar price to some of the oversized/under used vehicles I see on the road.
See? Parody.
Gas prices are temporarily going down because of a global demand drop caused by leftist policies. And electric car prices have risen significantly in the last year. Tesla in particular has raised prices more than once this year.
So, as usual, you’re completely wrong. How expected.
China locking down…again…is a major driver in the price of gas lowering.
Leftists are responsible for gas prices going both up and down, but the key thing to remember is that it’s bad either way.
” It is worth noting that the lower middleclass also benefits from Biden’s policies and so the goal of supporting the middle class is being met.”
The lower 3 Quintiles do not benefit from Biden’s loan forgiveness. It is completely and totally a handout to people who will earn 75 – 200% more in their life than people without it- people who are all poor.
Your attempt to justify this as just politics shows exactly how partisan you are.
As I have noted before the poorest are not excluded from loan forgiveness. In the same way that the poorest are not excluded from lower capital gain tax rates. What I am saying is that a strong middle-class benefits a democratic society. What I would like to see if stronger centrist of both parties that would focus on the middle class. The Roosevelts, Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson all worked for the poor and middle-class and we are better for their work.
“As I have noted before the poorest are not excluded from loan forgiveness.”
They just do not qualify for it. If Biden offered to wipe out the mortgages of people’s second homes, the poor would not be directly excluded…they just would not remotely qualify.
The only people who can run up huge debts are people with enough money to not need to work for years on end.
“In the same way that the poorest are not excluded from lower capital gain tax rates.”
401k is far more common than massive student loan debt. By magnitudes.
It also makes people like me, who DID pay their debts, to reimburse people who did not. Can you explain how the fuck that is fair or just?
401ks have nothing to do with the lower rates on capital gains. When money is withdrawn from a 401k the owner pays the same tax rate as regular income.
The poorest generally don’t have substantial student loans. Student loans are a phenomenon of the middle class.
But you aren’t helping the middle class either by forgiving their student loans, because you are just turning them increasingly into irresponsible welfare dependent morons with such policies.
No, we are not.
Johnson destroyed the poor. Welfare programs destroyed families and taught a culture of dependency.
Translation: “Stealing is ok if the government does it. We just need to work out the details”. Are you a Reason writer?
The Democrats are destroying, rather than supporting, the middle class. Their fiscal and economic policies are causing the middle class to stagnate, and their attempts at redistribution are turning the middle class into welfare dependent morons.
Giving money to the middle class is not “supporting” it. The middle class is a social and cultural phenomenon, and Biden’s policies are destroying it.
Furthermore, the current, extremely progressive US tax system is simply not sustainable. The middle class is effectively getting a free ride, while the top 20% are taxed disproportionately and shortfalls are financed by borrowing. If the US wants to continue to finance its massive social welfare state, it needs to raise US middle class taxes to European levels, meaning middle class taxes need to roughly double.
I have been solidly middle class my entire working life and the democrats continually find ways to fuck me in the ass.
Trying to think of a democrat policy that actually benefits America. Perhaps some demographic subsets, but truly not America.
You probably need to look no farther than you or parents for those benefits. The fact that you do not see them is a comment on your vision not their existence.
Yes, but not in the way you think. I come from a loving two parent family, frugal, health-conscious, education-oriented, instilling into me the importance of taking responsibility for myself and my fate. Those are all ideas that Democrats are busy destroying.
Democrats tell people the fiction that people succeed based on the wealth and privilege they inherit from their parents, that they can educate people to become successful, and that they can restructure society to achieve equity. That’s all utter and complete bullshit. Neither the state nor money can substitute for a good, two parent upbringing.
I think a lot of Democratic supporters are people who did grow up in (comparatively) wealthy and privileged US middle class households and are failing at life despite their wealth and privilege, and they are desperately looking for excuses. I suspect you are in that category.
The core of progressives and most Democrats is the belief in a central, comprehensive role for government in every aspect of life, from micro to macro. And Democrats need supporters who feel the same, which is most easily achieved by making people feel dependent and reliant on that government.
People who can or even seek to support themselves and run their own lives are “enemies” of Democrats.
“a central, comprehensive role for government in every aspect of life, from micro to macro.”
Republicans are the ones banning books and speech they don’t like and shoving state legislatures up women’s reproductive organs.
Just once can you people speak as if you pay attention to the world instead of repeating uncritical talking points like mindless zombies?
You’re talking about higher taxes on rich people. That’s the thing you’re characterizing as totalitarian intrusion. Meanwhile Republicans are calling for genital checks of children in local sports leagues. And that is not an exaggeration.
You are lying. Republicans have done no such thing.
Again, a complete lie.
You should ask yourself that question.
Just the stunning amounts of irony by you stating: “Just once can you people speak as if you pay attention to the world instead of repeating uncritical talking points like mindless zombies.”
More relaxed immigration policies benefit America, by allowing more ambitious people to move here.
Perhaps not coincidentally, the makeup of the Democratic Party has recently been trending toward high-earning professionals.
If we call “since the 1960s” recently, then… sure.
Many progressive dems despise the middle class. A good number of them (John Kerry, Pete Buttigieg, Warren, Whitmer, Murphy, Newsom, et al) don’t hide it. They want an aristocracy and a servant class.
Silliest thing I heard today. The fact is that members of the squad likely have more in common with the average middle class than many Republicans in Congress. Cruz, Hawley, Kennedy may all talk about the common man, but they are far from common. Look at their pedigree rather than their “ah sucks” way of talking.
AOC grew up in Westchester. Omar is a committed Marxist who grew up in Somalia, and Tlaib grew up in a heavily Muslim neighborhood in Michigan. None of these experiences are typical of the average American. They are all radical outliers, aggressive Marxist, and weirdos.
So stop with that shit. No one is buying into it.
Let’s be clear about Omar: not only is she a committed Marxist, her family was part of the Marxist regime oppressing Somalia under Siad Barre. Her family had to leave when people revolted to overthrow that regime. Omar’s family should probably never have been admitted to the US in the first place.
Hey, somebody had to gain citizenship to marry her own brother and give him residency rights.
You regularly call for genocide on this website, Ted.
But sure, Omar wears a funny hat.
Omar is a totalitarian and a Marxist, like her family. She wants to do to the US what her family did to Somalia. She is utterly evil..
Trump whined that his generals didn’t behave more like Hitler’s, so it looks like totalitarians all around.
As usual, Tony, you are lying. And you are doing that to try to cover up your own fascist ideology.
I couldn’t care less whether a politician has something in common with me. What I care about is whether they represent me.
The members of the Squad are ignorant, socialist a–holes using government to enrich themselves and gain power for themselves. The same is true for the Clintons, Obama, Biden, Pelosi, etc. Poor and middle class people becoming politicians is a recipe for corruption and self-dealing.
My ideal politician is experienced in business and already wealthy when they enter Congress. That’s because people with that kind of background are not going to use public office to enrich themselves, they have much better ways of making money. They are going to be much better for the poor and middle class than politicians who went from a middle class background directly into politics.
Mitt Romney disproves that last paragraph.
I didn’t mean to imply that it was a bullet-proof guarantee, just that they tend to be better, mostly because they are not susceptible to many forms of corruption.
As for Romney, through most of his career, he was a better politician and better for the middle class than most Democrats. But, yeah, trust fund babies like Romney are a distant second to people who worked their way up from the middle class into wealth. And Romney clearly either suffered a TDS-related stroke, or Schumer has pictures of him with a rent boy.
Romney would be better than any of the Dems, and some of the Repubs.
Look at their pedigree
Fucking idiot.
As a progressive Dem, I despise most people.
I want them secure in their basic needs so they don’t come around to bother me.
Bullshit. You want them dependent on government largesse, so you can control them.
You don’t give people money if you want to control them.
You make them poor and stupid and give them a religion to fight over.
dependent on government largesse.
It’s all about control.
“Dependent on.” You mean people are incentivized by money? Why don’t you say a salaried worker is dependent on the largesse of the company? Wait, bad example. Ayn Rand lurkers in these parts.
“Government largesse,” an oxymoron except when we’re talking about Defense or corporate other welfare. If the poor were being given “largesse,” they’d no longer be poor, and then you wouldn’t be able to find them in the wild.
“Control.” Let me get it straight. You give someone money because you want to control them. Is this a theory about social pressure? As in, my mom was generous to me this Christmas, she must be trying to manipulate me into buying her that car she wants? I don’t know how you control people by giving them money, other than in subtle social ways.
Bit if people are more easily controlled by having money, we should probably arrest all rich people. God knows what kind of orders they’re prepared to take with that much money poisoning their minds.
Why don’t you say a salaried worker is dependent on the largesse of the company?
Because they can leave.
Dependent (n) – relying on another for support.
Largesse (n) – liberal giving (as of money) to or as if to an inferior
You give someone money because you want to control them. Is this a theory about social pressure?
No. This is you being willfully stupid. It’s about being fully dependent on government for support. As in “You will own nothing and you will like it”.
Or this is meaningless psychobabble meant to justify the plunder of public goods.
This has always been a contradiction with libertarians and other market fetishists. Somehow rich people use extra money for virtuous ends while poor people getting extra money will just get them into trouble.
You haven’t refuted them, at all. Are you unaware of the concept of bribery? It’s simple… give someone else money and expect loyalty in return.
The difference is that rich people actually do this out of their own gains, while the government thinks it can “create” money out of nowhere and think there will arise no problems thereafter. Democrats do exactly the latter, without any potential consequences in regard. It’s not hard to learn.
Yes: you make people poor and stupid by giving them money, and then you have them fight over race and sexuality. That is exactly what Democrats are doing to Americans.
His lack of political self-awareness is staggering at this point.
Funny how you prove that progressive ideology is least capable of being achieved by progressive people.
High-earning professionals have always been in bed with the Democrats.
What has changed is that the working class and immigrants are figuring out what a fraud the Democrats actually are and are leaving.
And the pro-family pro-life Christian Hispanic immigrants are finding less to agree with among the woke progressives leading the Dems, especially if they fled countries ruined by socialism.
Libertarians traditionally celebrate high-earning professionals.
Since you’re so bitter and aggrieved that the professional class doesn’t buy Republican dogshit, is this perhaps a window to agree on some tax hikes?
The term “professionals” primarily refers to people like doctors, lawyers, engineers, accountants, academics, etc., people whose wealth depends on artificial, government-created monopolies, which is why they support Democrats. They also view themselves as intellectually superior, which is another reason they support Democrats.
I don’t know why any libertarian would “celebrate” such people. However, many self-identified “libertarians” are actually not libertarians, they just like some libertarian policies, so perhaps that explains your misperception.
I couldn’t care less who the professional class votes for; what I care about is that they are the beneficiaries of government-granted monopolies and massive government handouts, and that ought to stop.
No. Although the professional class certainly has lots of ill-gotten gains, there are many people with similar incomes who are coming by their high earnings honestly and without relying on government granted monopolies. You can’t tax just the ill-gotten gains of the professionals without also hurting those who earned their money honestly.
The way to deal with the professional class is to end their government-granted monopolies and their government subsidies.
So you think doctors are bad?
Doctors are members of a government-imposed cartel, and that cartel is responsible for driving up US medical costs to astronomical heights. American doctors are also guilty of massively overprescribing drugs, subjecting patients to useless tests, and failing to practice preventive medicine. And American doctors are voting to preserve this state of affairs.
So, yeah, as a group, American doctors are “bad” in the sense that they are abusing their political power to enrich themselves and that that hurts their patients.
Why the fuck is a libertarian magazine complaining about a wealth redistribution scheme not being progressive enough?
Seriously. Libertarian positioning here should be “Don’t give tax dollars to people.”
The LEAST libertarian position is “take tax dollars from the rich and give more of it to the poor.”
Means testing by income is a shite way to measure it, too, because 100K in Scranton PA is a hell of a lot more than 100K where I live (where you can’t buy a condo for less than $700K or a house for less than a million) if you’re trying to measure a “middle class” income.
Direct payments are wrong. Simply lowering the income level to make it more progressive is even more wrong. Framing the argument in this way borders on the ridiculous political canards politicians use whenever a tax debate comes around — and, trust me, if you’re mirroring that kind of vapid virtue signalling you’re doing a shit job as a journalist.
What article did you read? The I read didn’t say anything about redistribution or giving money to the poor. It said that Biden’s giveaways benefit people who don’t need it. Can you point to me where it said wealth should be distributed or that it wasn’t progressive enough? Seriously.
Or is this one of those things were people read an article and then determine what the it really meant from what it didn’t say?
Reason’s critique is that the money handout is not meeting the Biden Administration’s self-stated goals.
Logically, person B’s pointing out that person A’s actions are not meeting person A’s stated goals for said actions is not an endorsement of person A’s goals by person B.
Logic doesn’t apply here. Any attempt to even understand another point of view equals fully accepting and defending that point of view.
Heck, merely mentioning something that the evil other supports without pointing out that it’s evil by virtue of the source equals fully accepting and defending that point of view.
Haven’t you been paying attention?
Reason is not just complaining or arguing for more fairly targeted handouts, they’re pointing out the hypocrisy of the Dem politicians.
Highly schooled. The educated part is dubious.
Credentialed is the right word. Progressives think pay should correlate to credentials, and can’t stand that hard-working small business owners with less impressive degrees can out-earn them. Hence the support for unleashing swarms of officers from the IRS to destroy them and eat out their substance.
Is your argument that more people should be allowed to get away with cheating on their taxes?
You know that’s not his point. Do you not feel the least embarrassed by continually resorting to straw man and out of context framing?
IRS agents aren’t going to recover money from people who cheat, they are going to threaten, blackmail and browbeat innocent people into not claiming deductions they are entitled to. That’s because the stress, risk, and cost of an audit is massive.
There is a well-known band of deductions you can claim; if you go beyond that, you will likely be audited, no matter how well you document your deductions. The poor and middle class must stay within that band because we simply can’t risk being audited.
The top 0.01%, of course, can just let their tax accountants deal with the audits and claim as much as they can get away with.
But we all know, Tony, that you love the top 0.01% and that you hate low and middle class earners.
Biden says he’s going to help the poor and then gives money to people who don’t need it? Wow. There’s a shocker.
Biden was barely involved in this bill.
Other than being the progenitor of the bill and involved in its negotiation, you’re right, Biden was barely there.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udJw-CzX7sA
A complete lie and crock of shit.
Those earning under $50k voted for Biden by 57% to 42%.
Those making over $100k voted for Trump 54% to 43%.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1184428/presidential-election-exit-polls-share-votes-income-us/
Check by college degrees though.
Trump’s high income supporters tend to small business owners.
I feel your pain, loser.
Yeah, right. What did I lose?
You lost any sense of sanity. Trump really did you in.
Yes: single mothers, welfare recipients, ex-cons, people with social science degrees, etc.
Yes: small business owners, skilled trades, successful farmers, etc.
Your point being?
By the way, the Senate GOP just killed a cap on insulin costs that was in the inflation bill, a sure effort on the GOP to help the working man.
I feel your pain, loser.
By the way, the senate Democrats just killed an amendment that would have limited audits to those making more than $400k. The Dems want to get after folks with $601 in their accounts.
Say what?
Say what I said. The Republicans suggested that the new army of IRS bulldogs be limited to auditing only those with more than $400k of income. Failed on a party line vote. All 50 Democrats against.
Turns out it’s not just the Bad Team favors the wealthy. The Other Bad Team wants to audit a single mom’s $20k per year hair salon. Not those nasty millionaires.
Dems weren’t going to entertain any of the Republican vote-a-rama amendments because those were all designed for political ads.
That Republicans bother creating a reality to talk about in those ads when they’re perfectly comfortable shamelessly lying makes it a rather quaint ritual.
So you’re fine with auditing $20k per year to keep Republicans from a subject for adds? Lol. That makes you a heartless prick. But fuck whoever needs fucking for a couple of votes, right?
You are exactly who you hate.
The content of that bill is a void as far as Democrats are concerned. It’s not offered in good faith.
Given what this society does to other criminals who make less than 20K, an audit seems like a light touch.
Look at Tony. Shilling for protecting the rich. Let’s set the IRS on lunch ladies and ditch diggers. Dems did that while continuing to protect their hedge fund buddies and refusing to limit the audits to rich folks.
Too bad you couldn’t get the state tax break back for the super rich as well. Oh, well, can’t have everything I guess.
Your party is now the Party of Kings. Covered in pocket lint made of very fancy thread. Keep on defending it, pal.
The original bill was spectacularly progressive. But what are you gonna do with 50 senate seats, one of them from West Virignia?
Most Democrats opposed all the regressive tax shit. They had to let it in to get the big stuff. It’s called compromise, and in the best compromise, everyone bas shit all over them.
If the Party of Paupers wanted to affect any of those provisions, they had a whole 50 votes to. But nobody even blinks anymore when Republicans back the most stunningly egregious transfers of wealth upward. Which is their entire domestic policy platform.
I really hope the DNC plays you something for your allegiance. It’s embarrassing otherwise.
“Most Democrats opposed all the regressive tax shit. ”
Really? Then why didn’t they make sure the audits are of rich people who are genuinely cheating, not poor people afraid not to pay. They could just as easily spend the money on giving poor people the help they need to resolve tax problems fairly.
Ah yes because everyone who gets audited is a criminal. If you had said “what this society does to other accused who make less than 20K,” we might have believed you had genuine compassion. You know, if we hadn’t known you before.
And looks like Republicans got what they wanted: a bunch of absolutely stupid votes by Democrats.
Of course, Democrats are perfectly capable of introducing similar amendments themselves if they care to and fixing the legislation. If they pass it as is, then the Republican amendments simply highlight what’s wrong with it.
Most of the Dem backers, financially and in the primaries, are urban professionals with advanced degrees (and big student loans) — engineers, doctors, lawyers, government bureacrats, etc. Their biggest concern is “saving the planet” from the “climate crisis”, and trying to out-woke each other. They are typically not worried about the day-to-concerns of raising a family and making ends meet, and inflation means their debts are easier to pay off and their raises are bigger.
You’re full of shit.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1184428/presidential-election-exit-polls-share-votes-income-us/
You can’t draw inferences about people’s motivations from simple income statistics.
The fact is that Democrats represent a mix of people who have utterly failed (single mothers, ex-felons, welfare recipients, the unemployed, poor immigrants, etc.), government-dependent professionals (doctors, lawyers, tech workers, etc.), young urban professionals, government employees, and the ultra-wealthy. All these people have in common that they want more government handouts and more government monopolies.
Republicans represent a mix of successful business owners, middle class families working for private companies, rural voters, wealthier retirees, libertarians, etc. These people generally have in common that they want lower taxes, less government spending, and fewer government monopolies.
I disagree with just about everything Dems say and do.
But my Pharma pay check doesn’t lose any sleep over it.
While your selective class consciousness is welcome, I’m sure, I think it’s obvious that it’s not that wealthier people are trending Democratic because Democrats promise them more giveaways, but that party affiliation is becoming terminally correlated with educational attainment—which is associated with income.
Republicans put all their chips on people with a high school degree or lower, presumably because critical thinking isn’t taught until college. If that sounds snobbish, just look at the shit GOP voters are willing to swallow. I mean, it’s worse than you’d think, isn’t it?
“Class consciousness” is the tell that lets you know you’re dealing with a closet communist.
No shit, Brian. It’s almost like I went out of my way to highlight the sarcasm in that sentence.
Poe’s Law strikes again, all the easier because you are in fact a closet communist.
You’d like that to be the case because you think someone being a communist gives you permission to immediately dehumanize them. That shtick is not new, of course, though why you’d want to engage in the same mind-numbingly stupid practice as the Nazis and Joe McCarthy, I’m sure I’ll never understand.
I don’t actually talk about economic classes because I think it’s stupid. Everyone has a class but the poor. Ever notice that? They’re just the poor. Untouchables. Just sweep them under society’s rug.
Communists dehumanize others by calling them Nazis: all except good communists like themselves. They’ve been doing that fox nearly 100 years.
Gee, who does that remind me of?
For someone who says they don’t talk about things you sure do talk about things.
“Working class” is a euphemism. “Middle class” is a soporific. “Upper middle class” is a cope. “Class war” is an Orwellian slogan. Marx’s classes were describing conditions 200 years ago.
And there are about 5,000 communists in the whole United States. You have to admit that you don’t use this word because you’re interested in a genuine argument.
I just want to take a moment to talk to you about Jesus Christ.
The quintessential poor, brown socialist.
Except for the whole firing for everyone’s sins, giving everything away, and not worrying about himself or how he would live, he was exactly like an anxiety-driven poor young socialist.
TBF, poor young socialists don’t have a destiny of becoming an immortal deity. A cubicle job until they retire at 90, if they’re lucky.
I’ll take that: it’s from a primary source.
The old racial categories you people invented were ludicrous enough, but now inventing a “brown” race and classifying the Spanish and Middle Easterners under that really takes the cake for idiocy.
“For with the same measure that ye mete withal it shall be measured to you again.” – Luke 6:38
So much for socialism…
Democratic voters swallowed this as an anti-inflation bill, which is laughable. Idiocy is all around us.
Nobody swallowed this as an anti-inflation bill, probably not even the West Virginian voters who they were trying to convince.
Biden did.
I prefer the official title, A bill to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of S. Con. Res. 14.
Joe Manchin undoubtedly insisted on the nickname during his negotiations with Schumer, for reasons that, like Manchin himself, I can’t decide are genius or stupid.
Biden endorsed the Inflation Reduction name. It’s deceptive either way. Stop covering for him, you’re embarrassing yourself.
A high educational level usually results in a somewhat above average income, but you end up in professions where you are going to be working for someone else your entire life, often for the government. That’s why people with high educational levels vote for Democrats: their high incomes are dependent on government handouts and redistribution.
Critical thinking isn’t taught in college; college has become a political indoctrination machine, nothing more. People who graduate from college are less capable of critical thinking, rational analysis, or even basic common sense, than people who never went to college.
It is typical for progressives, and has been for more than a century.
I’m looking at the shit Democrat voters are willing to swallow. And it is just as bad as you would expect: after all, we have more than a century of experience with the destructive and irrational beliefs of Democrats and progressives: these people gave us scientific racism, Keynesianism, eugenics, segregation, affirmative action, and one war after another.
And again, the ultra-progressive shows just how bad progressives are at being progressive.
“Republicans put all their chips on people with a high school degree or lower, presumably because critical theory isn’t taught until college. ”
FTFY
Did they confirm high education and high income?
A lot of democrats get low income educations, like paying hundreds of thousand dollars a year for poor disgruntled teaching professors to read the opinions on the nature of existence from dead French child rapists to them and quiz them on it later.
You can learn more about existence from a single day of honest work than a PhD in that bullshit.
Do you have a favorite interpretation of quantum mechanics, or do you reserve judgment?
I only as because you seem to have done many days of honest work, and existence has some problems to work out.
When I want to understand the nature of the universe, I turn to drug-addicted gay French child molesters. Because of course everything’s the same.
If I wanted to learn about the nature of reality, I would hardly go to the French.
I assume you’d just shove your head up your own ass to see if there’s anything you missed.
I do find introspection an invaluable tool in the understanding of others, ironically most useful for those who struggle to understand others intuitively.
How do you understand other people by studying a self-assessed abnormal person?
One of those deep thoughts you have out on the rig.
Maybe one of these days you’ll figure out why you hate successful people.
It certainly can’t be self-loathing.
I don’t know how many times I have to explain this. I do not hate rich people. The only people I enjoy being around are rich people, in fact. Poor people make me uncomfortable, though I can certainly hang with the lower middle class if they share their drugs (not doing it sober!),
Maybe, if you look long and deep into yourself, you’ll figure out why your political views have a mostly vaginal essence.
Vaginal Essence, the new gay repellent by Calvin Klein.
Just spray it on yourself, spray it on your buddy, and you’re ready for a gays-free night on the town.
Then you go home and fuck each other because you’ve begun associating Vaginal Essence with your buddy’s meaty thighs.
And then find some boys to rape in the mouth while writing furiously about power imbalances in society,
I suppose I do need to think about my next move now that I’m ever-so-slowly growing out of my twink phase. Repeating the cycle of abuse I experienced for years as a young blond thing doesn’t really do it for me, but then I’m always surprised when a new fetish comes along.
Narrator’s voice: the next day, Tony was arrested for sexually exploiting boys on the internet.
Biden benefitting the well off with giveaways is less of an concern than him expanding the IRS to sic agents on American who aren’t even millionaires.
Yeah that’s right, Biden’s most miserable legacy might be empowering the one agency of government that’s especially distrusted by the American citizens. “What can I do to ensure that money and asset leaves the country during a inflation and recession”? Biden didn’t know the answer, but his handlers did.
I’m not under any illusion that the IRS is politically neutral, so they’ll further split the nation with their selective overreach.
As a tax preparer in a Blue state and very Blue city, the people in these higher income ranges are most of our clients at our firm. As a person who prepares their taxes, this is article is 100% correct.
Biden’s Giveaways ONLY Benefit Well-Off Americans
They are designed to crush the rest of us.
I know this class of people quite well because I am part of them. Yeah, they all complain about how they are merely “middle class” and drive 10 year old Priuses. But they definitely need a bail out to pay for their yoga classes, doggie daycare kids’ private school tuition and activities. I mean if they didn’t have that, they might not be able to afford that DNC donation check.
Thanks for your beyond belief blogs stuff. looking for a Accountant Cambridgeshire
World space technology manufacturers collaborate with the British market, catalyzing the local industry, Virgin Orbit’s Next Launch Will Take Place In Cornwall. Intelligence satellite technologies that were produced by British companies are not the only technologies that are popular outside the UK.