Is Crime Getting Better or Worse? We Don't Really Know.
The FBI changed the way it compiles data, and reporting law-enforcement agencies have yet to catch up.

Philadelphia residents are bemoaning the closure of two iconic WaWa convenience stores, largely as a result of "continued safety and security challenges," according to the Pennsylvania company. Illustrating those concerns is dramatic security video footage of roughly 100 teens ransacking a store last month, and that was just one recent incident.
Philadelphians are far from alone in their concerns; after decades of improvement, crime has reemerged as an issue amidst a widespread sense of increasing danger. But there's a catch: because of changes in methodology, crime statistics are less reliable than in the past. That leaves us working from limited information.
"Inflation, crime, and immigration are the top self-stated voter issues heading into the midterms," according to a Harvard CAPS-Harris Poll released last week. Inflation ranked as "very important" with 74 percent of respondents, 68 percent said the same of crime, followed by immigration at 59 percent.
Most polls produce similar results, with inflation and the economy as the top concerns, and crime weighing heavily on voters' minds. But, in some places, crime has pushed into the lead.
"Asked to choose the most urgent issue facing New York State today, crime (28 percent) ranks first among likely voters followed by inflation (20 percent) and protecting democracy (14 percent)," the Quinnipiac Poll found last week.
Well beyond the looting of urban convenience stores, crime obviously worries Americans. The data seems to support those fears.
"The FBI's crime statistics for 2021 confirm that violent crime continued to be a major issue in the United States, remaining at or near the 2020 level which saw a 5.6 percent increase compared to 2019," the FBI reported earlier this month. "Murder and non-negligent manslaughter recorded a nationwide increase of 29.4 percent in 2020. … Overall, the analysis shows violent and property crime remained consistent between 2020 and 2021."
Rising crime is always a concern, and it's especially so when it reverses expectations. As recently as September 2019, the FBI boasted of declining violent and property crime, which steadily fell for decades.
"Both the FBI and BJS data show dramatic declines in U.S. violent and property crime rates since the early 1990s, when crime spiked across much of the nation," Pew Research noted in 2020.
Why the unfortunate turnaround? Social scientists will likely be building careers on that question. It's worth pointing out that high unemployment and stagnant economic activity of the sort we saw with the COVID-19 lockdowns tend to lead to social unrest. So do the aftermaths of pandemics in general. It's difficult to build peaceful, free, and prosperous societies, but not so hard to break them.
But, granting that things have changed for the worse, how worried should we be about the crime we see around us? There's the rub; despite those specific-sounding FBI numbers, we don't really know the current crime rate. The feds recently changed the way they compile data, and reporting law-enforcement agencies have yet to catch up.
"In 2021, the FBI retired its nearly century-old national crime data collection program, the Summary Reporting System used by the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) program," Weihua Li of The Marshall Project, which specializes in journalism about criminal-justice issues, reported earlier this year. "The agency switched to a new system, the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS), which gathers more specific information on each incident."
"Unfortunately, despite the advantages of the newer National Incident Based Reporting System, many state and local law enforcement agencies have yet to make the switch," the Brennan Center's Ames Grawert and Noah Kim commented this month. "Law enforcement agencies covering just over half of the population reported a full year's worth of data to the FBI in 2021. By comparison, the FBI's recent reports have been based on data from agencies covering upwards of 95 percent of the population."
"The gap includes the nation's two largest cities by population, New York City and Los Angeles, as well as most agencies in five of the six most populous states: California, New York, Illinois, Pennsylvania, and Florida," added Li.
The omitted agencies and jurisdictions plan to eventually catch up with the new reporting system. But those are major oversights when you're trying to figure out what's going on in large swathes of the United States. Yes, if the neighborhood outside your front door transforms from a pleasant oasis to a perilous hellscape (or the reverse), you've probably noticed. But if you're trying to get a grasp on what's really happening across the country, you're stuck working from limited information. And it's too easy to misinterpret what you see.
"Throughout the past two decades, the majority of Americans have reported that crime trends are worsening (Swift 2016), despite the fact that crime rates in a variety of contexts have been decreasing," researchers noted in a 2019 paper in Deviant Behavior.
Those researchers tested the common assumption that scary headlines and TV news stories were responsible for perceptions of rising crime when the country was actually getting safer and couldn't find a connection. When it comes to whodunnit, maybe it wasn't the media, after all. But that didn't change the fact of people's mistaken beliefs; it just means that they couldn't establish a cause. And that was at a time when crime statistics were fairly reliable.
There are other sources of crime data aside from the FBI, point out the Brennan Center's Grawert and Kim. But those sources, public and private, don't entirely agree with each other. Some show increases in homicides and violent crime in 2021, though at a slower pace than in 2020; others show a decline. These sources also aren't as well-known as the FBI data which, despite the flaws of the old methodology, gave us comparable information year after year.
That leaves us making judgments based on reports about convenience stores getting looted in major cities, and other high-profile news stories. But, while crime increased with the disruptions of 2020, those stories don't give us a good handle on whether conditions are still deteriorating or getting better. That makes it difficult to make plans, whether that involves personal decisions about where to move for a better life or policy judgments about things like criminal justice reform.
So, is crime getting better or worse? You can make an educated judgment about your own community. But on a larger scale, like most everything else right now, it will be a while before we sort out the mess.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I am making 80 US dollars per hr. to complete some internet services from home. I did not ever think it would even be achievable , however my confidant mate got $13k only in four weeks, easily doing this best assignment and also she convinced me to avail.
For more detail visit this article… http://www.Profit97.com
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot (ks-59) of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
…
Just open the link——————–>>> http://Www.TopCityPay.Com
Some of us have changed measurement systems in our work environment. We are familiar with the term 'overlap', meaning for a period 2 reporting systems are used, to provide continuity. This is because the data is considered important.
I guess the FBI was able to determine on our behalf that the crime stats weren't sufficiently important to do the overlap thing. Gee man.
Sure, national crime rates -- using commensurate numbers -- are currently hard to estimate precisely. However, most big cities and states publish their own data on crime rates, and those should be reasonable consistent over time in how they are measured and reported. My state and county have good time series data on this, as do some nearby jurisdictions I checked, so with a bit of work, one can make fairly broad conclusions about wide-area trends.
Stop with the racism. Doing your own math and research while not considering skin color is the old white devil method. It is wrong. Why can't you just subscribe to Twitter and get information like a real journalist. Come on man!!!
They're not looting--they're collecting reparations.
Jeff the retard will tell you that this is “whiteness”.
But totally not CRT.
You expect journalists to do work and not just copy/paste convenient propaganda? What a heartless monster you are!
The timing makes it all seem deliberate but at least some of that is just coincidence. From the priorities of Soros DAs being covered for and then the later lockdowns and racial riots of 2020.
Time to start Wringing My Hands!!
Polls show Democrats at risk over a major issue of crime so, '.....we don't really know the current crime rate....educated guess.....' And Locals certainly don't know how to count or track crimes.
Reason should just merge and become NPReason.com
^this^
Water-carrying for the left.
Nobody wants them. No matter how hard they try.
Well said. Tuccille and ENB both shilling for team blue, as faux-reasonable as their points may appear on the surface. People, dare I say lower income people, often non-white, are more likely to see, experience, and be negatively impacted by the clear rise in crime than Beltway-dwelling 'journalists.'
I wonder what reason would say if an individual claimed crime was up? Oh yeah; “Got any stats to back up that claim?”
There is a new version of Dr. Trump's Butthurt Salve. Look for Heavy Duty Republican Formula with Extra Novocaine desensitizer on TRUTH nationalSOCIAL.
Have fun in November, pedo.
LibTrans is a non sequitur.
Next up on Reason: “Food Desserts”. Hey WaWa, you can build as many chain branches as you want, as long as 20percent of the chains exist in Mogadishu community no go zones or food desserts. A new food take from the YIMBY housing activists in New Jersey. Progressive democrats suing the New Jersey progressive democrat governor over 20 percent public housing in all new buildings.
Progs actually are happy to see WaWa go-they poison black and brown people with junk food and tabaccy and can be replaced with something the white elites approve of, like a yoga studio or dog bakery.
Look, we might not know, but ENB assures us that a crime wave is mythical here:
https://reason.com/2022/10/18/dont-believe-the-people-blaming-crime-on-defunded-police/
Of course there's more crime. What do you expect after Democrats create COVID, shut down the economy, and defund the police? It's all the fault of Democrats, but Democrat Reason won't tell the truth. Fucking leftists.
Did I do that right?
Poor sarc.
What an intelligent comment! I'm floored!
It doesn’t take much.
More intelligent than your hamfisted attempt at sarcasm. Which is ironic, given your handle.
Sarc lives in a perpetual alcoholic fog.
It might be more sarcastic if it wasn't essentially all true.
More like Poe's Law.
You actually kind of did.
Just one time, I would like to be as drunk/high as sarc, just to say I went beyond human capacity at something.
Are you trying to channel buttplug, the known child porn advocate on the site? Thats the look you want? Fuck sake man, low even for you
We can't know anything unless we have verified FBI experts to tell us. Otherwise how would we ever realize anything? I didn't realize my brother got murdered until the FBI explained it to me, I just thought he was sleeping.
Good point. The FBI lost all cred when they raided Trump. Now the organization is nothing but a branch of the Democrat Party, and whatever they say will be for the purpose of electing Democrats.
The FBI lost all cred when they raided Trump.
I'd say it happened far earlier when they literally colluded with Russian intelligence to take down the duly elected president, but a midnight raid on a former president over a matter typically handled by lawyers years after the fact was also an alarmingly political use of state power.
My comment has little to do with the credibility of the FBI specifically, but the fact that apparently this author thinks there's no mechanism for gathering data that doesn't go through the government. There's actually mechanism to privately verify everything if you feel it's worth the effort, and if you're writing a story about it, perhaps you do think it's worth the effort.
Reason has run several articles comparing and contrasting privately acquired data with that from the FBI. The privately acquired data is mostly compiled from newspapers, so it’s limited to what the cops will disclose to the press. While the FBI data is limited to what the cops disclose to the feds. Which means that no matter what it’s mostly bullshit.
There’s actually mechanism to privately verify everything if you feel it’s worth the effort, and if you’re writing a story about it, perhaps you do think it’s worth the effort.
Look, he checked Twitter and didn’t find anything trending. What else would you have him do, man?!
So, I guess you're one of those special libertarians who believe in a secret police. You see, this is the problem with TDS. It gets even libertarians to believe shit that even an imbecile would question. This is an organization that, in the Trump investigation alone, was guilty of (apparently multiple) lies on search warrants, lying to the President of the United States (presumably a federal agent) and starting an investigation based on evidence they knew to be false at the time. Hell, the number two was on Sixty Minutes bragging about trying to figure out how to remove the duly elected president (that's better known as a coup d'etat). And that's just Trump. You also have the whole Whitmer farce. And I'm sure we could rattle off a dozen additional known, proven abuses of government power. If you're claiming to be a libertarian, and find yourself supporting them, you've probably lost your way.
I find that whatever follows "So, I guess you're..." is total bullshit. Your comment was no exception.
If I said a thing that was false, you're open to correct me.
I'm not going to break down an entire paragraph sentence by sentence, especially when people on this site have a long history of calling me a liar when I contradict what they say about me.
You're not worth the effort.
Shorter sarcasmic: What you've said is true. I just don't want to acknowledge it.
I no longer entertain posts that tell me what I think. If you want to know what I think, ask.
You’re vapid enough to write for this garbage webzine.
Because you can’t. Your hatred of Trump is more important to you than stopping a corrupt FBI. You are not worthy of respect or civility. You’re just an angry, whiney, broken drunk.
Taking over JesseAz's job?
You’re a broken drunk.
Great. One asshat stops being an asshat, and two take his place.
No, you’re just an angry bitter drunk. There is no point to you, other than your irrational hatred of Trump. Biden is pushing us into WW3 and a nuclear exchange. But it’s TDS 24/7 from you.
"The FBI lost all cred when they raided Trump." That happened way back when the FBI was investigating the Christian Front in 1939 and 1940. Just ask Father Coughlin.
TDS on display, and overlooking the other several, recent, more egregious abuses by the FBI
Sarc: def not a partisan lefty shill
You thought you could believe your lying eyes? Wait for an expert to publish a study telling you what to think.
Is Crime Getting Better or Worse? We Don't Really Know.
If crime were getting better, would the FBI need to change the way it compiles data?
Immediately following a 20% increase in crime and a newly "elected" Democratic president. Yeah, we totally changed it for no reason and I know it's just so darn frustrating that we don't know if crime is going up or down, sorry.
And totally not a recession.
According to the linked article, the FBI announced the change in 2015, giving law enforcement agencies until 2021 to prepare...
Government shouldn't compile or analyze statistics on anything including crime. It just creates a motivation to DO something and that's the slippery slope to communism.
If someone can make money telling other people about crime, then we should let the market price system decide what info should be known. Otherwise, stop obsessing about things that are none of your business.
Citizens! Crime is none of your business. Nothing to see here! Move along.
Law enforcement is a core governmental purpose. But the government shouldn't collect and analyze statistic on crime to determine who well they are achieving that function. Yeah, that makes sense.
Christ you are the dumbest person on this board. Dumber than shreek and Tony.
aye
Hey I'm just parroting Mises stuff:
official statistics just help create a rationale for pernicious policy making
https://mises.org/library/trouble-economic-statistics
Or maybe the solution is to only allow statistics/analysis that have been vetted (or lied about - doesn't really matter) to support a let's do nothing narrative. Like - oh - it's just the flu.
Or hell maybe since crime is a CORE government function, we should probably define everything we don't want to have happen as a crime. That way we can measure it and make sure we do whatever we want to do to make sure it doesn't happen.
Government is force. Period. It is quite simply the people who have the last word in violence.
The question of what government should do is a question of what justifies the initiation of force.
To some like Tony the answer is "Anything I want."
To libertarians the answer is more like "In response to force or fraud, such a criminal activity or military invasion, and courts so people can resolve disputes without violence."
Collecting stats is really not force
How else are they supposed to justify their existence? Trust them?
How else are we supposed to know if what they want is justified if we don't know the actual crime rate? Moreover, in this case the government is lying about there being less crime than there actually is. So, don't tell me that the government will just lie to justify more action because the opposite is happening here.
The government/media doesn’t want us to know.
So, don’t tell me that the government will just lie to justify more action because the opposite is happening here.
I don't follow. Do you mean those calling to "defund" the police? I don't think the police and FBI are tooting that horn.
I know it’s hard for you to focus, but we were talking about statistics.
Sober up, rummy.
Competition! We need two stats agencies. One called Stats to Prove How Great We Are! The other Stats to Prove That America Needs more Top Men and Socialists!
That way we can know what narrative the agency will support and we can just shut the other one down after every election. Maybe send those other employees to clean toilet bowls in Alaska.
Apologies that Top Men includes only one gender. It should of course include the most common 76 genders and more if those fit in the door
We don’t really know what’s going on because getting information from the police is like pulling teeth. They don’t like being answerable to anyone. Who might they answer to? Maybe law enforcement at a higher jurisdiction? Like the FBI? Even then good luck making police departments comply. Who’s going to make them? What are you going to do, defund them?
Which is where my bright idea comes in. “No more federal goodies for you unless you fess up some real numbers to the bureau.” Since most if not all police departments in the country is addicted to something federal, we might get some useful information.
You leftists already do.
you clearly forgot the old saying that “If You Can’t Measure It, You Can’t Improve It.”
I get your point, but I do disagree - we should be tracking these things - otherwise, how do we know when to throw the bums out!?
Which is exactly why they’re lying about the increase in crime that’s obvious to anyone who lives or works in a major city.
Collecting data to assess performance = communism. You really don't have a good grasp on most things you inject yourself into, but this slippery slope claim may be one of your most laughable.
I agree, street justice is the real answer. You steal here, your body ends up in a dumpster. The word gets out. People fucking chill.
"Government shouldn’t compile or analyze statistics on anything including crime. It just creates a motivation to DO something and that’s the slippery slope to communism."
Going in my dumb shit Libertarians say file. Congrats!
It's getting worse. Can women walk alone safely in major urban areas?
Not with all those seditious MAGA types on the loose.
What is she wearing?
And/or, would you let your teenager work on weekends, in any position, in one of these shit holes? No wonder they can’t hire anyone.
'Crime' is a big category. If you include fraud (tax, insurance, SS, bailout[, vote haha]), then it is probably increasing, no?
And how do you define 'severe' crime? It is relative to resources, no? A $100 loss some is a bad dinner, for others a key bill payment.
Perception of public order is much worse. Lots of pushers (onto train tracks) in NYC, shooters in Killadelphia, squatters / homeless in many big cities. The murder numbers in some areas are pretty clearly not going the right direction.
Harder to tell with other (property) crimes.
It is very likely safer overall to be a kid (if a lot more 'nerfed' than even 15 years ago).
"And how do you define ‘severe’ crime? It is relative to resources, no? A $100 loss some is a bad dinner, for others a key bill payment."
Very true. A $100 for some is a week's worth of food for their family. For me, it's a tip at a really good restaurant.
Newsom, is that you?
Weird flex bruh
Someone should tell Jefferson's Ghost that virtue-signalling with food is like playing with your food. It's never polite.
In this context “crime” usually means things against people like violence and property crimes. The kind of crimes police only investigate when pressured, because it doesn’t give them the opportunity to
extort moneygive fines andstealforfeit property."In this context “crime” usually means things against people like violence and property crimes. The kind of crimes police only investigate when pressured, because it doesn’t give them the opportunity to extort money give fines and steal forfeit property."
There are policies the police have which can effect "investigations" of crime. A friend of mine's NPO was burgled for about $2500 -- an employee was suspected (and later admitted it), but, initially, my friend had no proof of the employee committing the crime, so he requested fingerprints be taken. The police department's policy that there had to be at least a $20,000 loss for them to bother with fingerprints. Your tax money at work.
I can think of two reasons to call the cops. You've got a dead body and a damn good excuse, or you need a report for insurance purposes. Expecting them to investigate and do their job is not on the list.
Reason #3 to call the cops: sarc is looking in your kids window.
Kill sarc and then call the cops.
The new normal at Reason; hundreds of words telling us they don't (can't) know what they are talking about.
Does this count as the first step in a 12 step plan?
TooChilly and Reason are a complete and total fucking joke. Remember back a few years ago when fugazi Reason libertarian Ed Krayewski was shilling for Soros shitbag Larry Krasner? These Wawa store closures are a direct result of this disaster. Philadelphia has ceded control of the city over to the wild animals in human form, and it's a similar story in L.A. and San Fran and every other city with these Soros shitbags
These businesses are basically being left with no alternative but to shut down operations in these hellholes. The police cannot or will not protect them any longer, and the business itself using deadly force to protect employees and the business from these wild predatory animals isn't even a viable option, because know if they do the Soros scumbag Krasner and his friendly judges will put THEM in prison instead of the wild animal pack peeps.
Fuck off and die Krayewski and all the rest of you leftie fugazi fuckheads.
Reason shilled for cashless bail and every Soros funded prosecutor out there. Now that that has turned into a complete disaster, suddenly reason is like "we will never know what the real crime rate is". Give me a fucking break. How about taking responsibility for the effects of the policies they supported for once? God forbid.
It’s a core policy of the Democrats and their supporters at Reason to emptytheprisons, so here we are. Now the excuses include “we don’t know if crime’s going up”, or “that’s racist”, or “vagrancy and public intoxication aren’t really a crime”, or “it’s not serious if it’s less than $1000”, or my current favorite “it’s Kia’s fault because they make cars too easy to steal”, etc.
Democrats get power, they let
motherfuckerstheir constituents out of prison. They don’t need much of an excuse, as we saw out here in California with fucking Covid. We’ve seen it over and over. Luckily people are believing their lying eyes and not some “you see, crimes actually going down, uh, since the 90’s” bullshit.It’s probably too late for the major shit hole cities, but hopefully the results of the next election will knock some sense into the Democrats before a mob of subhumans shows up with crowbars to your mall.
Responsibility is racist!
And sexist, homophobic -pretty much the whole grievance shebang.
I for one am excited at the prospect of the McDonalds secret police.
It may have been tucille who claimed -I can't find the piece, that progressives and libertarians share a lot of the same goals. Though, sounds more like suderman...
'"Asked to choose the most urgent issue facing New York State today, crime (28 percent) ranks first among likely voters followed by inflation (20 percent) and protecting democracy (14 percent)," the Quinnipiac Poll found last week.'
How about the most urgent issues among likely voters who actually work for a living? I suspect they are not so worried about democracy.
https://notthebee.com/article/philadelphias-da-says-its-racist-to-talk-about-lawless-democrat-run-cities
When the only tool you have is calling other people "racists"...
An accusation now so overused it’s just meaningless white noise.
TooSilly being TooObvious.
Thanks to Tuccille for the reminder that the looter Kleptocracy might, just maybe, be a leetle less than truthful. In the half-century since the real LP was founded, world population has doubled. The year the LP was organized, Canadian population growth nearly tripled as Americans said NO to conscription. Every new law defining victimless minding own business as "crime" by definition adds to "crime" counts. We should count those laws and see both curves on the same chart.
You're not saying that the Libertarian Party is responsible for all that world populatin' and Cannuck populatin' are you? And where are the Libertarian Spoiler Votes to stop crime rates, whether victimless or otherwise?
I stopped believing "crime reports" when I learned that Police Department crime reporting is optional and nobody enforces an agreed upon standard for reporting.
We don't know the answers to these questions because ppl don't want to know the answer. If they actually had a solid answer, they'd have to DO something and couldn't just ramble whatever numbers fit the bull they are selling that day.
Getting statistical information from your Farcebook feed is much more likely to create an accurate picture.
I'm excited for your man-on-the-street videolog results
My late father actually worked on crime reports for the Boston Police back in the 1960s-70s. He told me that while City Hall could play with some crime statistics, homicides (and I think rapes) had to be reported to the FBI, so they couldn't be fudged. While shooting can increase without an increase in homicides, in the end homicides are a solid number. I assume from the article that this hasn't changed, so look at what you do know - have homicide rates nationwide gone up or down?
There is a question? Are you kidding me? To be fair, I live in California but crime is up. Way up.
My entire adult life, I have bought the over incarceration argument. And yes, far too many people were jailed for possession charges and that was, and still is bad. But I have done a 180. We need mass incarceration. If you're shoplifting multiple times a day; if you're stealing catalytic converters (theft and vandalism); and the list goes on. You need to be in jail. At least for a while. Add to this, this ridiculous no cash bail crap. Yes, crime is way up and it is all around us.
As a reformed democrat, I am fully resolved to never vote for another one. And I'm not convinced that the GOP has the answer. But I've grown tired of the soft on crime and abusive to the poor policies of today's left.
We’re going the route of ‘Mad Max’.
Better yet, we could carve out legal provisions for defending one's property via 2A.
To be precise, there is overincarceration of victimless crimes. Theft, vandalism, et al are not victimless crimes.
If I take the crime rates of Jackson, Raleigh, Omaha, North Platte, Casper, Dubuque, Jasper, Helena, Seattle and San Francisco, I will 100% agree that determining if overall crime rates are going up might be difficult to do.
I don’t know where these Reason staffers live, but wherever it is, it must be a real red-state, low crime mecca with a racist Republican governor in charge.
But for those of us that live in Soros-funded criminal-justice-reform-central libertopia and are surrounded by forward-thinking Safe interjection sites our eyes tell a different story.
I share the jist of your sentiment fully, but interjections are not a crime (yet) and they are barely a vice. 😉
interjections--Schoolhouse Rock
https://youtu.be/YkAX7Vk3JEw
Sorry, I couldn't resist. 🙂
Oh, and the Seattle Times is the weasliest newspaper on the planet when it comes to reporting bad news that rubs against the narrative grain. And yes, this is one of those stories that's gone from, "It's not happening; Ok, it's happening but it's not as bad as you say," to "Ok, it's actually worse than you say, but this is an opportunity for social justice!"
What did that misogynist racist Nazi Jordan Peterson say about systems? Something about it being a lot easier to mess a system up than it is to improve it?
The cops are busy protecting Kshama (Defund the police) Sawants house from poop.
O/T: I’d like to take this moment and welcome Hispanics into whiteness.. per CNN —the only reason Hispanics would vote for a Republican is proximity to whiteness. So now whites, Asians, Hispanics and black conservatives are all under the spell.
If you want to find out the lord of the flies shit going on, just sign onto NY Post everyday.
Pretty soon everybody but black democrats will be white supremacists.
In case there's any confusion, this article is cheering that process on, not indicting it.
Tucille is a regime cuck willingly moving the goal posts as often as necessary.
Is inflation up? We’ll never really know. Time to hire some “policy wonks, economists, data scientists and urban planners ”. Jobs program for Top Men.
DID LOCKDOWNS WORK GEE IT'S JUST UNKNOWABLE! - Reason
Just get up and watch the local news every morning. There'll be a new shooting or shootings from the night before every time.
Are "school shootings" up, down or steady?
this is not true. the fbi is not the only source of this information. often you can get it directly from the cities which is where the fbi gets their data. these days many cities make it available on their own websites in a much more timely fashipion than the fbi who often take a year or even two to publish it. the bureau of justice statistics also has crime data as does the cdc.
For even better data, you can get it by going house-to-house and asking residents directly.
Surely, there's no problem with that approach?
The upcoming election is almost 100% about lived in issues that directly affect voters. Crime is no longer some distant concern like mass shooters or illegal alien criminals. People saw cities burn during the riots, and the result backlash against police resulted in less stability in society that’s plain to see – flash mobs robbing stores in plain daylight was not a common thing in 2017.
And people are likely experiencing more crimes themselves. My family was carjacked twice in 2021, after never being carjacked in the last 20 years. They took off the catalytic converters, that being just one of the crime trends that time, and the mechanic in our usual body shop confirmed it. Now, if you understand the time and cost it took us to tow two cars away and purchase a new catalytic converter, you’d know crime would suddenly become an important issue. We weren’t some victims of anomaly that was hyped as crime wave by FOX News. No, that’s been happening to our social circle as well.
SF recalled Chelsea Boudin, which would be like MAGA county recalling Destantis. It’s unthinkable. But that’s how bad that place is. My cousins who live there were ALL carjacked. They just smash windows and take the thing inside. Imagine living in a city where in some places, you have to leave your car unlocked so criminals can search your vehicle without smashing windows. Could you every live in any peace there? Not to mention all the homelessness.
Stats are important. But sometime gut feelings of a society are an indication. Republicans basically erased much of the pro abortion momentum the dems had for about a month. They’re starting to make some real gains among traditionally pro dem demos. This is more than party gaining in an off year by the ruling party. People can see surging prices, shortages, and more crimes on a more visible, consistent basis. And there’s a nuclear war looming on the horizon.
It's so obviously common knowledge now that anybody who thinks it's so hard to tell whether crime is rising is willfully ignorant and only listens and reads Swamp Media to find out what he's supposed to think.
Not that hard for this author to figure out too that you CANNOT TRUST the FBI or any other government slime oozing out from their spokescreatures.
You're making Vladolph chuckle.
My sympathies to you and your family for the carjackings. It must have been terrifying!
Ever since that word entered our culture's lexicon, I lock my car doors before I put the key in the ignition.
What is it with catalytic converters? I live in NC and got mine almost sawed off and it had to be replaced to the tune of $1200! The mechanic said he seen a whole parking lot of cars with missing catalytic converters!
Oh, and by the bye, catalytic converters are among the key components that have reduced air pollution since the 1960s, so you'd think Eco-concerned people would be hopping mad at criminals stealing them!
Here's hoping things get better all over the country. And while crime is definitely a concern, don't sweat nuclear war. Anyone responsible for starting a nuclear war once the dust clears will not be safe in their own nation or anywhere in the world.
Valuable metals. From the interwebs: The rhodium, palladium and platinum used in these parts are valuable, and rhodium can go for $20,000 per ounce, according to the National Insurance Crime Bureau. Palladium costs nearly $3,000 per ounce, and platinum costs about $1,128 per ounce.
BTW, I don't think carjacking means what XM thinks it means. Carjacking is stealing the car when you're in it, not stealing things from it while it's parked/off and you're not around.
There has never been a crime epidemic anywhere in America … The overwhelming majority of citizens in any venue in America don’t commit crimes nor are they criminals
The FBI has always been flawed and driven by survey data from Selective cities in America!!! The FBI is clueless about the actual crime rate in America
The index of random crime aka stranger danger is so low it can not be charted!! The most dangerous person in one’s location is in their household!!!
The Real Crime is the Crime of Reporting Crime
Greg/BLM
So if we ignore those “Selective cities” everything is fine?
What a cuck.
When it came to getting brains, Everything Is So Terrible And Unfair ™ with Thrasher Greg/BLM.
Well if the method for measuring crime is flawed, then how do you know there has never been a crime epidemic? And without the keeping of records, how do you know who is a criminal and who is not?
And especially how do you know how likely danger comes from people in your own home when for the longest time, such danger was not classified as domestic violence but was chalked up as life?
And does the fact that the FBI's methods are rotten mean that we throw up our hands and stop trying to understand the nature of crime and say stupid shit like: "The Real Crime is the Crime of Reporting Crime"?!?!
Get back to your Niteall and Night Train and leave the crime problem to the living and the rational, Greg/BLM!...You big dummy!
Sanford Dummy Reel
https://youtu.be/moYdbNXBwvk
"We Don't Really Know?"
Oh, Bull shit!!
We all know - and so does all of law enforcement, politicians, and especially the FBI!!
I noticed only one reference in the article to the “BJS” – that’s the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Way back when I was a sociology undergraduate in the late 60’s and into the early 70’s, I took a variety of social sciences classes, including criminology. A problem with ascertaining the level of criminal activity was known as the “phenomenology” problem. That is, reported crime, either via complaints or reports to police or, in a few cases, crimes actually observed and dealt with by police directly, was significantly less that the actual level of crime. For a variety of reasons, including fear of dealing with the police, most crime went unreported. Basically, if the police didn’t know about specific instances of a crime, they didn’t exist.
The solution to this problem was the development of a survey methodology that would interview people and find out if they had been victims of specific categories of crime. We needn’t get in to all of the complexities involved in developing the survey instruments – suffice that the Bureau of Justice Statistics developed and expanded on this methodology and has been publishing its results on all crimes except homicide (obviously, homicide victims can’t be interviewed and, more to the point, homicide reports, for reasons that should be obvious, will almost always show up in police/criminal justice data).
If we look at 2020 BJS data (released by the BJS at the beginning of Fiscal 2022 in October 2021), we find that aggregated crime DECLINED by 22%. See https://bjs.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh236/files/media/document/cv20.pdf
So, all of the demonstrations and attendant riots associated with George Floyd’s death, which gave the impression of out-of-control crime, were totally unrepresentative of actual crime. A 22% drop is a very big deal. Why did this happen? My own view is that the shutdown, by its nature, forced people to remain at home and, in the USA, break-ins of occupied homes are relative rare because most American homes have guns and would-be burglars (as criminologists Wright and Rossi noted) “don’t want to be shot”. At the same time, and somewhat anomalously, homicides, per the FBI’s UCR, went up something like 30%. Yes, we know about the FBI’s methodological problems but an increase in homicides does seem to have taken place. My personal view on this is that the black market drug trade became increasing violent because, just like legitimate business, the black market experienced supply chain problems and black marketeers and the gangs that relied on drug revenues entered into lethal competition. I haven’t seen this idea advanced anywhere else but it makes sense to me.
The data for 2021, published by the BJS the beginning of this October, shows that crime only went up around 1% . See https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv21.pdf
(Note Table 1) What surprised me was that 2021 was 15 years AFTER 2006 the first year the female Total Fertility Rate (TFR) was ABOVE the zero population growth rate of 2.1 in 35 years (going back to 1971). One of the best predictors of the violent crime rate is the percentage of young males, ages 15-24. The year 2021 should have been the beginning of an increase in crime and, given the anomalously low level of crime thanks to the pandemic shutdown, it should have rebounded in a big way. You should further note that the 2021 report shows in urban, inner city crime did spike, exactly as anticipated, despite the low overall crime.
Here’s the bottom line. Crime rates in the US are the result of two important factors: (1) the destruction of the (mostly) black, inner-city family such that the most criminogenic families are headed by single females; (2) the effect of the criminal black market in drugs. Forget about police and lax prosecutors and all the rest. The Democrats (and some Republicans) were responsible for the Great Society welfare programs and those were abject failures and a major reason for family destruction, which had major criminogenic effects. Instead of acknowledging the failures, Dems claim racism and “white privilege” must be the explanation – that and, of course, guns. The Republicans think that it’s a law-and-order problem and that we need more police, SWAT teams, and military equipment, like armored vehicles (one was purchased for Bloomington Indiana where I live). They are BOTH wrong. Libertarians MUST arm themselves with the best data so that the REAL reason can be addressed and we don’t have to live within the worst elements of a social-welfare, police state.
No doubt the shut downs have greatly skewed statistics, much like steroids in baseball.
I'm surprised that Reason isn't confirming the obvious increase in election denialism.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11352487/Hillary-Clinton-claims-Republicans-plan-steal-2024-presidential-election.html
Oh, wait...
Oh, the FBI changed the way they do data. How convenient!
Bullshit premise from a bullshit publication. Gee I'm not sure what's going on, says "reason".
If crime was getting better, why would The FBI changed the way it compiles data? DUH!
The politically partisan and corrupt FBI is trying to hide the increase in crime under the Biden regime.
The efficacy of govt. is manifest in all areas, e.g., less than zero.
Waiting for govt. to provide anything except chaos, injustice, collapse, is futile.
Therefore, protect yourself, govern yourself, be politically mature.
For example, if you own a store, arm yourself, advertise your ability and intent: "I don't call 911" (picture of a machine gun/dead robber).
Honestly could you expect "honest", i.e. "objective", reporting from the heavily politicized government in DC as channeled through a mostly, make that MOSTLY, "woke advocacy" MSM? And remember too that our DC elites mostly live in safe gated neighborhoods, safe from the demographics they promote for the rest of us to endure.