COVID-19 Measures Magnified the Wars on Drugs and Sex Work
Plus: International Whores' Day, U.S. Postal Service sued over the seizure of Black Lives Matter masks, and more...

"Widespread reliance on punitive approaches to enforcing public health" harms marginalized groups, says Amnesty International. A new report from the human rights group Amnesty International suggests quarantine rules and other COVID-19 restrictions were especially damaging for groups already more likely to face discrimination, police harassment, and unjust criminalization. Amnesty International calls on governments to reject using criminal sanctions to implement public health goals and "refrain from implementing repressive policies" in the name of protecting pubic health.
"Though Covid-19 measures may have varied from country to country, governments' approaches to tackling the pandemic have had a common failing," said Rajat Khosla, Amnesty International's senior director of research, advocacy, and policy, in a statement. "An overemphasis on using punitive sanctions against people for non-compliance with regulations, rather than supporting them to better comply, had a grossly disproportionate effect on those who already faced systematic discrimination."
"Contrary to the often-voiced claim by governments that 'we were all in this together', the truth is that their responses to Covid-19 have been experienced unequally," states Amnesty's report. "Nowhere is this more evident than in the impact of Covid-19 measures on people who are discriminatorily targeted by criminal sanctions or punitive laws, policies or regulations," including people who are homeless, engage in sex work, or use drugs, as well as people "targeted because of their sexual orientation or gender identity and expression."
Amnesty's report comes from a survey of private groups "working on issues including sex workers' rights, LGBTI rights, drug policy reform, homelessness, racial justice, Indigenous people's rights, discrimination based on work and descent, and sexual and reproductive rights." It includes information from 28 countries, including the U.S., Canada, and Mexico.
Examples of COVID-19 restrictions in these countries include lockdowns, school closures, curfews, mandatory quarantine requirements, and "in some cases, forced confinement in camps or other state-run facilities," as well as restrictions on public assembly and protest and closures of bars, restaurants, shops, and other workplaces. "These measures have had a particularly severe impact on the ability of people living in poverty and other marginalized communities to work and support themselves and their families," the report points out.
COVID-19 restrictions also had noneconomic consequences, including increased targeting by police. Nearly three-quarters of the 54 organizations Amnesty surveyed said "the communities they work with, including sex workers, people who use drugs, LGBTI people and people in need of abortion, were punished for breaching Covid-19 measures," according to Amnesty's summary of the report.
In addition, COVID-19 restrictions exacerbated the negative consequences of existing laws and regulations. For example:
According to the Mexican human rights organization Elementa, the country's punitive "war on drugs" has enabled police forces to target people who use or possess drugs through the enforcement of Covid-19 related measures. In an alarming case that sparked widespread protests, a construction worker, who at the time was under the influence of drugs, was arrested in the western state of Jalisco, allegedly for not wearing a face mask. He died in police custody days later. His body was covered in bruises and he had a bullet wound in his leg.
In Belize, Indonesia, Mexico Nigeria, Uganda, the Philippines, Tanzania, and UK, civil society organizations working on issues including LGBTI rights, drug policy reform, the rights of sex workers and ending homelessness, have reported that marginalized communities have seen an increase in surveillance and harassment from law enforcement and have been disproportionately affected by arrests, fines and detentions during the pandemic.
In Argentina, a sex worker-led organization reported police violence against transgender sex workers, including "beatings, searches and arbitrary detentions" and that sex workers were harassed by police "for quarantine violations when they went to the supermarket or the neighbourhood pharmacy."
The report is full of examples like these:
In Uganda, in 2020, 23 youths were arrested in the shelter for LGBTI people where they lived on the pretext that they were guilty of "a negligent act likely to spread infection of disease," as well as "disobedience of lawful orders." In April 2020, police in the Philippines forced three LGBTI people to perform humiliating acts as punishment for supposedly violating the curfew. The punishment was recorded on video and posted on social media….
In Zanzibar, Tanzania, Front Line Defenders reported that in April 2020, as part of nationwide enforcement of Covid-19 related measures, police targeted houses known to be occupied by LGBTI people and sex workers and forced 15 sex workers to leave their homes, claiming they were breaching physical distancing requirements….
In Norway, the sex worker rights organization PION reported that law enforcement agencies used legislation relating to the control of communicable diseases as a pretext for harassing sex workers, resulting in arrests, detentions, heavy fines and deportations of sex workers who are foreign nationals.
Marginalized and criminalized groups were also more likely to suffer under COVID-19 restrictions by being unable to access support and services typically relied upon. These services may have been forced to stop operations during lockdowns, or may have been subject to increase monitoring by law enforcement.
"For example, a harm reduction organization based in the USA described how police parking close to syringe exchange sites deterred people from coming to access services," notes Amnesty's report.
Meanwhile, sex workers and others in underground industries were barred from government handouts designed to mitigate the fallout from pandemic shutdowns. "Over half of the organizations surveyed reported that the community they work with had been excluded from any state support measures and over half also reported specific barriers preventing people who are marginalized or criminalized from accessing Covid-19 relief services or support schemes," notes Amnesty.
And those subject to unjust criminalization were also barred from participating in decisions about pandemic restrictions, notes Amnesty. "Unjust criminalization…created barriers to the meaningful consultation and participation in governments' decision-making by individuals and organizations whose expertise and experience could otherwise have informed and improved states' pandemic response," the report states.
It also notes that while "widespread reliance on punitive approaches to enforcing public health and social measures" may have fallen hardest on marginalized groups and communities, the rights violations they engendered were not exclusive to these groups. "Amnesty International has documented cases in at least 60 countries where authorities' use of such measures has violated a range of human rights," it says.
FREE MINDS
Today is International Whores' Day, a day commemorating a landmark 1975 sex worker rights protest in Lyon, France, and calling for an end to repressive policing of sex work around the world. Eurydice Aroney has a great Twitter thread about the day's history:
The strike was prompted by a string of unsolved brutal murders of sex workers in and around Lyon. At the same time, the police also clamped down on the small hotels where sex workers saw their clients. Sound familiar? pic.twitter.com/0aTiYbwjb3
— Eurydice Aroney (@eekiemout) June 2, 2022
Almost immediately, the weeklong protest reverberated beyond France, and it has continued to inspire generations of sex worker rights activists. "News of the strike spread to other sex worker activists like Roberta Perkins from the Australian Prostitutes Collective," Aroney points out. "During the 1980's she'd recount to us young whore activists the story of the strike. These were our 'motivational moments' and we used them to inspire others."
But I wanted to know more so I went to Lyon to discover what became of the strikers and discovered that Radio France had the most amazing radio archive of the strike. You can hear them in this @radiofrance documentary (with English subtitles).https://t.co/leswSXOAgX
— Eurydice Aroney (@eekiemout) June 2, 2022
For more on International Whores' Day's history and impact, check out this podcast conversation between Kaytlin Bailey and Ceyenne Doroshow.
The struggle for sex worker rights continues today, of course, with movements in the U.S. and around the world pushing for the decriminalization of prostitution and for "rights, not rescue," to borrow one popular sex worker rights slogan.
While attitudes toward casual sex have largely loosened since the 1970s, the criminalization of sex workers in many countries has gotten worse and worse, as activists have successfully conflated sex work with sex trafficking and pushed for more prostitution arrests and sex worker surveillance as the means to combat the latter. For more on this push and its effects, check out these stories from me and others at Reason:
• The War on Sex Trafficking Is the New War on Drugs
• Sex Slaves and the Surveillance State
• The Truth About the Biggest U.S. Sex Trafficking Story of the Year
I recently debated British feminist Julie Bindel about sex work decriminalization, which you can watch here:
FREE MARKETS
The U.S. Postal Service is being sued over the seizure of Black Lives Matter masks:
A California screen printer is suing the U.S. Postal Service for seizing shipments of Black Lives Matter masks intended to protect demonstrators from Covid-19 during protests following the May 2020 murder of George Floyd.
The cloth masks, with slogans like "Stop killing Black people" and "Defund police," were purchased by the Movement for Black Lives (M4BL) and were meant to be shipped to D.C., St. Louis, New York City and Minneapolis, where Floyd was killed by a police officer. But four boxes containing about 500 masks each were marked as "Seized by law enforcement" and their shipment was delayed more than 24 hours.
The lawsuit, filed on Wednesday and shared first with NBC News, accuses U.S. Postal Service and U.S. Postal Inspection Service officials of violating constitutional rights under the Fourth Amendment by improperly seizing the boxes without probable cause, a warrant, or even reasonable suspicion. The lawsuit also raises the possibility that officials violated the First Amendment by seizing the masks because of their political messaging.
QUICK HITS
ICYMI: It's now up to 3 U.S. senators personally urging President Biden to release Leonard Peltier from prison.
"It is clear that our criminal justice failed Mr. Peltier," says Sen. Mazie Hirono, the latest to make the appeal. https://t.co/3IK3BM1aI2
— Jennifer Bendery (@jbendery) June 1, 2022
• "Abortion providers in Florida filed a lawsuit Wednesday to try to block the state's new law banning abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy, which is slated to take effect July 1," The Washington Post reports.
• Anti-LGBT panics are bad for everyone's liberty, warns Reason's Scott Shackford.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"Widespread reliance on punitive approaches to enforcing public health" harms marginalized groups...
Hell, if invoking identity politics is what it takes to end this thing, I'm all for it.
'World Ends: Woman and Minorities Hardest Hit.'
It's even better. It's "World Ends: Drugs and Prostitutes Hit Hardest."
Which, I think, may be a pretty perfect high-level view of Reason style libertarianism.
Massive loss of freedoms everywhere. Here in Canada you still can't hold many jobs or travel out of the country without the now completely useless Pfi$er jab. Protesting the government led to enabling acts and seizure of bank accounts. Californians are still forced into mask theatre. Millions of small businesses were crushed. The biggest transfer of wealth away from the general population in human history occurred. Record bankruptcies. More imaginary money created in the last two years than ever before. Massive borrowing. Etc...
But somehow hookers and the alphabet sex cult are the real victims.
You live in Canada? And you admit it? Dahyum, bruh.
Here in Virginia, masks are making a comeback: grocery stores, office supply stores, Costco, university kids.... and the local news media have started banging their drums again about numbers of people who have tested positive, yada yada yada.
It is not going to go away, sadly. At this rate I would prefer a huge meteor to hit Earth and rid us of the unfit for survival, ya know?
At this point >60% of the COVID+ admits at my employer's hospitals are coming in completely asymptomatic, and another ~40% are coming in for non-COVID issues. Some people are just addicted to the drama. Unfortunately those people are extremely well-represented in the public health apparat so I will at least be stuck doing the pandemic dance for the foreseeable future.
Stole my joke.
Today is International Whores' Day...
Including all you attention whores out there.
Let's celebrate with a 'ho-down!
I told her those heels were too tall to walk in.
How dare you!
This is grown-up stuff. Go to your room!
And I deserve it.
And I'm worth it!
"Women and minorities hardest hit"
Consensually, of course.
Yay, Whores!
It's now up to 3 U.S. senators personally urging President Biden to release Leonard Peltier from prison.
How far the FBI has fallen in the eyes of our legislators.
Anti-LGBT panics are bad for everyone's liberty...
No doy.
But Covid restrictions hurt “marginalized groups”.
World To End Tomorrow: Women, Minorities Hardest Hit
It's probably safe to assume that if Covid restrictions only hurt "non-marginalized" groups, Amnesty International would be fine with it.
Who knew small business owners were considered a marginalized group? Or is it only groups marginalized since Covid?
...quarantine rules and other COVID-19 restrictions were especially damaging for groups already more likely to face discrimination, police harassment, and unjust criminalization.
If it saved just one life then it's a small sacrifice for easy police targets to make.
Can we say the same for inflation?
Amnesty's report comes from a survey of private groups "working on issues including sex workers' rights, LGBTI rights,
"All in favor of LGBT say 'I'!" 🙂
"Aye" or "I"?
Or "Eyeball" according to CBS.
https://youtu.be/MIgFZ-fsJQs
.. Black Lives Matter masks intended to protect demonstrators from Covid-19 during protests ..
It has been said that the right kind of protesting protects you from the ‘rona, no mask needed.
Or you if you are one of the politicians screaming loudest about mask wearing you are exempted while you party. The peons serving the maskless politicians have no such exemptions however.
“A vaccinated and sophisticated crowd”.
A vaccisticated crowd.
Not wearing a mask has been proven to be both safe & effective.
...the country's punitive "war on drugs" has enabled police forces to target people who use or possess drugs through the enforcement of Covid-19 related measures.
I'm beginning to suspect weaponizing public health might not have been all that bright a fucking idea.
Depends what you think the goal was.
There's something really bizarre about newly liberated people turning into oppressors in turn. Makes you wonder if their gripe was not loss of liberty so much as plain old jealousy. The LGBTQWERTY crowd wasn't the first and won't be the last, but the speed with which they went from "stop arresting us" to "we demand government-sanctified marriage" to "we demand government-mandated indoctrination" to "we demand government-mandated grooming" astounds me.
Makes me wonder who the next group will be and how fast they will change sides. Considering the change in abortion laws coming up and the general backlash to wokeness, I wonder if it will be from the religious crowd for a change.
Makes me wonder who the next group will be and how fast they will change sides.
My money's on furries.
Furries for Jesus!
If you knew anything about Furries you'd know there's a very intensely weird religious contingent of them. I've seen so, so many crayon drawings of Sonic the Hedgehog praying at the foot of the cross on Gethsemane.
I've wasted my life.
But not in the way one might think:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nWIt5LZUwtg
To be followed by furries arsonists. It's not easy to get out of a furries suit when you're set on fire.
"Makes you wonder if their gripe was not loss of liberty so much as plain old jealousy."
As is always the case when you are dealing with commies.
They want to upset the power balance and make everyone equal! Oh except for this elite set of "extra equal" people, they get more power, money, and privileges because reasons.
Envy and desire for power is absolutely at the heart of every good marxist.
Not just Marxians. All statists -- they can't run their own lives, they are frustrated at seeing so many people who get by, and they lash out by pushing government to fuck up the people they are jealous of. Tear everybody else down when you can't make yourself better.
There's an unlimited pool of people that want to lord over others. Trump wore his gigantic ego on his sleeve but they've all got it as bad or worse.
"I wonder if it will be from the religious crowd for a change"
Ha-ha, nope.
Next up pedophiles, then beastiality, then sexual cannibalism/physical harm.
Any successful backlash against woke will first originate from the Bill Maher/Ricky Gervais crowd rather than the religious.
"to "we demand government-mandated grooming" astounds me."
I think there is a unique thing in the Trans movement. It is dominated by white (biological) males who want to exercise power, but would have been disqualified by intersectionality. They have wrested the reigns of control from other activist groups because any other era they'd have been in control anyways.
They have used the activists' rhetoric against them. As they take over the groups, those leaders watch Black Lives Matter, Young Adult Fiction, Schools and other traditional liberal institutions hijacked by these men because the whole constitution of these liberal institutions prevents them from complaining.
The religious crowd has always been anti-liberty. YahWeh was anti-liberty. Saul of Tarus was ant-liberty. Yeshu ben Yosef was pro-liberty but nobody cares about him except to scream "DZHEE-zuhs" and pat themselves on the back. If they could legislate Deuteronomy, they would.
anti*-liberty. Same as ant liberty really
Is this another OBL-type parody account for mocking Shrike's atheism?
Is sex workers hardest hit the new minorities hardest hit?
I think that was always the case in ENB-town.
If your extended family is like mine, you probably have that one relative who says "The US Military was better decades ago, when it wasn't as obsessed with woke nonsense." My brother-in-law has made this idiotic point several times.
But we left-libertarians know the highest priority for literally any organization is to promote equity and diversity. That's why today's military is our best ever, with the Marines tweeting Throughout June, the USMC takes #Pride in recognizing and honoring the contributions of our LGBTQ service members. We remain committed to fostering an environment free from discrimination, and defend the values of treating all equally, with dignity and respect. They even included a pic of rainbow ammo! 🙂
So fine, maybe this country isn't as good at "decisively winning wars" as it used to be. Who cares? I'll gladly take today's intersectional military over the less inclusive version that won World War II.
#DiversityAboveAll
#DiversityAboveAll
Did that edge out #OpenBordersAboveAll?
If only the military was committed to killing people and blowing things up in defence of the nation
I respect that OBL is demonstrating the basic truth that ALL liberal institutions are destined to become myopically focused on Trans issues. We know his journey is complete when all he talks about is the rights of trans immigrants.
OBL knows that trans rights in the US are so debased currently that we are scaring away many powerful, trans-Mexicans who choose to stay in their trans-friendly nation rather than deal with just how hateful we are in the US.
In the spirit of International Whores' Day, "Calling All" by Phantogram.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MR-Xo7PecP4
The chorus is "We all got a little bit of ho in us..."
Actually no, the chorus is "Shake, you know you wanna shake, keep goin now, keep it goin now" with "shake" being the singer's euphemism for sex in her lyrics.
They work better when the lyrics are half-nonsense. Also, she should go back to being a brunette (rare I say that).
I can't believe Voices came out eight years ago. Christ, I'm getting old.
I saw them in 2019. Front row. Great show. Mister Impossible is really good live.
And I agree, she's much better looking as a brunette.
And those subject to unjust criminalization were also barred from participating in decisions about pandemic restrictions...
Like any of us weren't out of the loop on those public policy decisions. Our Blue Check betters egged on already eager leaders to ramp up the lunacy. Discussion was all but banned. They did it for the feeling of superiority, for the money, to win elections and to otherwise engineer their top-down dystopias. Welcome to the war.
And those subject to unjust criminalization were also barred from participating in decisions about
pandemic restrictions...their own healthcare.Always trust Rolling Stone to provide hard-hitting analysis of THE PATRIARCHY and its brutal oppression of women.
"Men always win": Survivors "sickened" by the Amber Heard verdict
#BelieveWomen
She should have identified as a man.
If only she were a student at the University of Virginia.
Could have been worse. This poor gal got smoked because of her LadyDick, and the guy got off (Apparently in multiple ways).
https://news.yahoo.com/ex-virginia-tech-football-player-174642601.html
Sounds more like he got off because that was a pretty fucked up thing and the victim was about to pull a knife on the young guy.
Man, that story is a David Lynch film. Or a David Waters film. Depends on what genre you want it to be.
What genre is David lynch?
Horror/Comedy vs. Comedy/Horror.
I'm admittedly thinking very specifically of 80s Lynch stuff, particularly Blue Velvet, and when I said David Waters I meant John Waters and I'm thinking horrifying camp.
The victim of rape by deception killed his rapist. A 40 year old man who got his pleasure from exploiting young male athletes just out of high school less than half his age. He was playing with fire in a stupid and evil way and got burned.
It's pretty telling how the mainstream media is almost all pro-Amber, while every other subcommunity seems to be either pro-Depp or at least split down the middle.
That's a pretty clear example of how far removed from the population the media actually is these days.
It's a she-said thing. There is no he-said in their world.
Bingo. Even when it was proved she was abusing him physically, that was dismissed.
Also pretty telling that rolling stone cannot get anything 'metoo' related unfucked. One might think after erdely's massive fraudulent cock-up, they would give it a rest. But they keep churning out the same narrative-driven schlock, all of it dishonest when it is not complete fabrication. Or, as with this article, a combination of dishonest and fabrication.
Good morning Peanuts! Isn't Biden doing a terrific job? Isn't this economy amazing? My fellow liberal capitalist Jeff Bezos made $1.4 billion yesterday. That means the economy is in wonderful shape. So if you're not making way more money under Biden than under Trump, you're doing something wrong.
#TemporarilyFillingInForButtplug
Hmmmm mm let's see a Ukrainian flag emblem, and a huff post link... This is someone that no reasonable person should listen to
Mazie be crazy.
She does seem more than a bit demented most of the time. And, ignorant on most topics that she speaks, not to mention a lackwit. Career government employee, and poster child for congressional term limits.
This is someone that no reasonable person should listen to
B-b-but... they support the current thing!
Needs more monkeypox.
So the lock downs are bad because they affect fags trannies and hookers. If they were exempt ENB wouldn't care
Honestly, the hyper-restrictive bath house era of homosexuality gave us Rob Halford, and he's the greatest gay person ever, and the greatest metal singer ever.
So, maybe we should think twice here.
Halford would probably, if writing for a libertarian in name magazine, be able to differentiate between moral panics which are historically bad for civil liberties, and the 'panic' of legislation with which he does not agree. Also, Halford might not subject readers to writing across the board on issues distorted through a lens of his personal biases. All while being metal as fuck.
All while Sad Wings of Destiny plays in its entirety. He's so perfect.
Oak Park and River Forest High School administrators will require teachers next school year to adjust their classroom grading scales to account for the skin color or ethnicity of its students.
Honk! Honk!
Smart play. You're not helping minorities get an inferior education unless you're actively anti- smart minority.
Skin color is the most important thing
"In an effort to equalize test scores among racial groups, OPRF will order its teachers to exclude from their grading assessments variables it says disproportionally hurt the grades of black students. They can no longer be docked for missing class, misbehaving in school or failing to turn in their assignments, according to the plan."
But if you are white, you better: be in class, well behaved and you better turn in those assignments. According to these teachers, you're not as stupid and irresponsible as those black students, so shape up or ship out!
def not the soft bigotry of low expectations
This crosses the bigotry of low expectations and sails straight into active racism.
They can no longer be docked for missing class, misbehaving in school or failing to turn in their assignments, according to the plan."
This really isn't any different from teachers passing ghetto kids along to the next grade level even if they can't actually do the work, which has been going on for decades. What they're essentially admitting here is that they aren't in the business of providing education, they're in the business of creating alienated marxist activists.
Ha like teachers know how to handle variables
It is amazing how inferior the anti-racists think black people are.
So they're requiring teachers to be openly racist because "racism." Sounds legit.
Integration was a mistake.
I know how we can solve this! Instead of different grading systems, lets just put them in separate schools to make things easier! Then one system can be applied to the white school, another to the black school!
I wonder if they ever for a second think how much they sound like Klansmen.
The Democrats only pretended to change in the 1970's. Thanks to Wokianity and the hard work of people like Kermit Gosnell and Antifa, it's business as usual.
Since I've moved back to Arizona and have been working outside a lot, my normally incredibly pale northern European skin is now a bright sunburn. Is that better or worse than white?
It's worse. This is a typical white person thing to have. Work on a tan. I spend every weekend day fishing. Last summer I got dark enough to have an opinion.
Worse - it's basically Apache blackface.
"According to the Illinois State Board of Education, 38 percent of OPRF sophomore students taking the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) failed.
The OPRF failure rate was 77 percent for black students, 49 percent for Hispanics, 27 percent for Asians and 25 percent for whites."
I know how we will get the students doing the WORST on standardized tests to do better! Lets not hold them to the rigorous standards of showing up, doing homework, and behaving that the students who are doing proportionately better are.
Or fuck it just eliminate the standardized test, thatll work too
I wonder how much time Thomas Sowell spends sighing any given day?
Chicago schools just made 20% a D.
Black is for straight A's, Asians and white hahaha haha you think working hard will get you anywhere? Try being black
Are you honking because you love it?
Fuck Off, Witch-Burning Nazi!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QumW5NICuL0
GONGED!!!!
https://youtu.be/9E9ftsaHtWw
It’s part of the clown world meme:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vB-qWovaCLo
I prefer the good old dsys when lunacy was "race"-neutral and color-blind and loved on the basis of merit and ability
:
The Gong Show - Gene Gene The Dancing Machine (5)
https://youtu.be/cj4jN-T5g8M
Nice thought, but file this under "wishful thinking." Government is force. The only tool they have is coercion. When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10877955/Heard-faces-career-ruin-bankruptcy-Johnny-Depp-battle.html
'No way back for Heard in Hollywood': Amber Heard faces career ruin AND bankruptcy as she struggles to pay Johnny Depp $8m after losing bloody six-week court battle that has left her 'too icky for a studio'
You started it, lady.
Poetic justice would be Depp getting movie roles back and her going absolutely broke, never to get a role again, going down as the liar who made everyone more skeptical of the MeToo movement. We are on track to get there.
The MSM is doing their best to paint her as a victim still, and I am sure they will be crying tears for the poor helpless woman who cant get roles anymore, because they cant help themselves.
I've already seen people talk about how this trial is going to make women that were abused less likely to do anything about it. Stuff like - https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/johnny-depp-amber-heard-trial-verdict-we-ve-all-lost-n1295801
"While the throngs of Depp fans may believe that they’ve picked the right side in this trial, they are also enabling damaging stereotypes about survivors. The public humiliation of Heard will only make victims more afraid to come forward. No matter who "wins" this lawsuit, it feels as if we have all already lost."
"they are also enabling damaging stereotypes about survivors."
This type of passive nonsense needs to be called out. Is this author saying it would have been better for Depp to just accept false accusations and shuffle off into the night? If not, then they should shut the fuck up.
Is this author saying it would have been better for Depp to just accept false accusations and shuffle off into the night?
Yes, that's exactly what they're saying. When a lying bitch ruins a man's life, after years of emotionally and physically abusing the man, it's the man's duty to just take it all in stride and fuck off. It's called "manning up."
THIS IS WHAT CUNTS LIKE THIS AUTHOR ACTUALLY BELIEVE
I think it's more like the attitude that cops have when they discover someone is innocent but railroad them anyway because they're guilty of something.
I’m shocked you think that.
I apologize for disagreeing with the caricature of me you have in your head.
Lol, I was being sarcastic.
As a general rule I ignore your comments anyway, so it's not like it matters.
Poor sarc.
There may be some of that. After all, I've seen a lot of people saying things like "Well, Johnny Depp isn't perfect and while he may not have done 99.9% of the shit things she accused him of doing, he still said nasty things about her while venting to friends, he drank and did drugs a lot, and probably did/ said things to her while drunk or high that weren't nice so... fuck him! He must be guilty of something!"
Worse, they are saying women are the abused regardless of their actions or the evidence against them and men are always the abusers. The mepoo movement and it's corporate whores have lost the last ounce of goodwill from me if those are the immutable rulesm
And also: this is a bunch of victim blaming.
Depp was the one libeled and slandered here. If anyone should be shamed for "discrediting" the stories of true victims, it should be Heard. She is the bitch who tried capitalizing on a lie, and cheapened the actual tragedies that have happened.
"the internet simply wasn’t built for a trial like this. Some of the social media content slamming Heard has even (reportedly) been paid for by conservative websites. A psychiatrist who testified on behalf of Heard is facing a campaign of negative online reviews meant to sabotage her career...
Why is our supposedly progressive culture suddenly obsessed with old-school, misogynistic tropes about lying harlots? How did we go from “believing women” to cheering their humiliation?"
What a stupid, wicked cunt MSNBC opinion columnist Liz Plank is. She's not for truth or justice but for pushing her Woktian cult. This is what Cardinal Ximenes would have written if he was a fat 21st century blue-haired non-binary.
Some of the social media content slamming Heard has even (reportedly) been paid for by conservative websites.
"Reportedly" in this case means "I have no evidence to link to or otherwise present, but I'm just going to say it as if it's a fact anyway because I'm a lying cunt who glorifies other lying cunts for a living."
She fucked her way in to the biggest role of her career, and she not only had no chemistry with the lead in that movie (which was obvious even with all the creative editing), she's aging in dog years now and what little screen charisma she had is going to be diminishing fast. A good actor can push past that, but she's not a good actor, as the trial made abundantly clear.
With that said, Depp's stans are utter lunatics, thinking that he and Kate Moss should get back together.
she's not a good actor, as the trial made abundantly clear.
I loved the part where she was very obviously fake crying on the stand (there were no actual tears) and then her former acting coach - who was called by her legal team as a witness for her - let slip on the stand that she had problems crying on command because she couldn't produce real tears. Oops.
That was definitely a nail in the coffin for her case.
I'm glad that this went to court. The idea that women who claim abuse must always be believed is absurd. Women lie about that all the time. And they know it.
She took that idea to court and it lost.
For that I'm quite happy.
This is a weird case. I think she could win on appeal from what I saw, but it's hard to say. I tend to trust juries judgement on things, even if I think it's wrong.
There's always OnlyFans. If the "catch me outside girl" can somehow make $50 million off of lonely hornballs, then Amber Heard should have no problem raising the money. I feel no sympathy for the lying bitch. And I say that as someone who once had her as my celebrity "free pass," but no more. Way too crazy to be worth sticking it in.
I once saw a pickup truck that was totally devoted to her. Very very odd.
Which "her?" Amber Heard or the "catch me outside girl?" Either way, very weird.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10878477/Musk-doubles-new-WFH-ultimatum-telling-Tesla-staff-colleagues.html
'If you don't show up we will assume you have resigned': Elon Musk doubles down on his new WFH ultimatum to Tesla executives telling staff they must be in the office with their colleagues
Normally I like the guy, I can't agree with that. The office at work is a cacophony of constant distraction. A home office can be a much more productive environment.
Especially if you’re day drinking.
He believes in the Ballmer Peak, but thinks the peak is always one more peak away.
https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/2795/is-the-ballmer-peak-real
https://xkcd.com/323/
Like you know anything about working,
I'm still confused about how you can drop a basket of french fries in the oil from home.
Drone?
I'll be interested to see how it plays out. I'm all for WFH. I got my WFH, moved out into the desert, and they will not be able to get me back.
Someone else will hire me, luckily. If I can get a few years of WFH at my current job I can come close to having the savings to really fuck off too. Like, go work at the university to supplement my income and otherwise not worry too much.
Depends on the work I'm sure. What I do requires concentration, and a busy office doesn't lend to that.
One finger typing is hard.
Depends on the nature of the work. WFH is great when you're banging through tickets or pumping out spreadsheets, but not so much for creative work and complex, cross-functional efforts.
The network and cultural effects of physical proximity simply can't be reproduced when everybody's remote, unless your team is full of crazy people that enjoy their jobs a little too much. Those "distractions" are extremely useful over time, especially for less engaged employees.
The network and cultural effects of physical proximity simply can't be reproduced when everybody's remote, unless your team is full of crazy people that enjoy their jobs a little too much.
Or crazy people who like to get things done rather than spend half the day hanging out.
Those "distractions" are extremely useful over time, especially for less engaged employees.
That would describe the member of the team who got fired when they stopped renting the office and told the rest of us to gather our workstations and go home.
It is more about having extra domain experts in close proximity. Where I work networking for complex systems is a requirement. Discussing interface issues, having the firmware team, and such is crucial for productivity. Being able to walk a few cubes down to an EM expert to discuss a critical effect on hardware is crucial.
Agreed, though I meant network in the social sense. WFH is ill-suited to coaxing corporate staff out of their silos and away from their totally super urgent deliverables.
I have been in several companies that completely lost their edge because of a permissive WFH culture. You need to have a well functioning management crew to support WFH, and that is when you are talking about individual contributors whose jobs do not require a lot of collaboration.
In groups with lots of dependencies, WFH can just kill the productivity. You have to schedule creative sessions which is awkward and almost never productive. And small blockers that would take a hallway conversation now require you to schedule time on someone's calendar.
I say this as someone who has been WFH for the better part of 10 years now. It is not easy, and it has downsides. In my previous company, being WFH required the exact same process: my CEO had to approve my WFH status. It ensured that only very specific people with a successful track record could work from home.
This is exactly what I was getting at.
Depends on the work and the size of the team. I'm in a small team and we work solo for the most part. When we need to collaborate, screen sharing and speakerphone is suffices. So it works. I wasn't saying that it works for every job and every person.
That's why I disagree with Elon on this. Some people are more productive at home, and should be given the option.
You work in a call center?
You're like IT, right? You do server management stuff?
It's a typical three-tiered application and I work on all three layers. Someone else does the server stuff.
I send him the WAR file and he deploys it.
Got it. For some reason I thought you were like an IT admin at a hospital. Maybe that was Diane Reynolds. Or maybe I just don't know shit.
There's a few people here who work in hospitals. I'm not one of them.
This is a great idea by Elon. Cutting the corporate fat where it's the fattest. Way too often those in upper management get ivory tower syndrome, this brings them back down to earth.
So masks which don't spread the "correct" message could result in police action? Interesting. I wonder when they will stop shipping my MOFA hats....
My BOHICA masks were also confiscated.
"Musk to Tesla and SpaceX workers: Be in the office 40 hours a week or quit"
[...]
"Musk memo: "If you don't show up, we will assume you have resigned."
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2022/06/musk-to-tesla-and-spacex-workers-be-in-the-office-40-hours-a-week-or-quit/
So it’s bad to want people to work for their pay?
I still think it's reasonable. I am very pro-WFH. I got my Remote work, I'm doing it. I will quit and look elsewhere if they take it away from me.
But, that's still how it goes. It's a contract with my employer, they have terms, I have terms, if we cannot agree then it's not a bad thing to part ways on friendly terms. Maybe if we saw some details of timelines on Musk's part for RTO I'd have more criticism, but I don't know.
Real question though, is the broader trend now just that Remote work is not only accepted but virtuous in industry? Or is this just shit talking Musk?
I'm sure a lot of it is tied in to this post-Covid pretense by Millennial and Zoomer techheads that requiring them to come in to the office to work is oppressive and destructive to their mental health.
Yeah, and I hate that. Mostly because I hate the over-medicalization of everything, and everything becoming an actual mental disorder or distress rather than just a preference. It's okay to have preferences, it's okay to want things from your life, and it's okay to try to argue for them and walk away and look elsewhere if you can't get them.
There's a weird thing in my generation of not being able to just like something for itself. They have to like it because it's right, or it's the best thing of its type, or whatever.
"There's a weird thing in my generation of not being able to just like something for itself. They have to like it because it's right, or it's the best thing of its type, or whatever."
Not sure what your generation is, but among us Xers and the Boomers I interact with, I don't think this is new. My wife was constantly pressured by the Mommy Bloggers who insisted that their choice to breast feed was not just a preference but a god damned moral and medical necessity. And if you didn't torture your child and yourself to make breast feeding work, well you were a terrible person. And it wasn't just breast feeding, but the child seating and the natural organic fooding and the free range babying and all the other nonsense. Personal preference became this moral necessity that was just pushed.
I see the same thing from my parents and in-laws. Going out to restaurants or staying at a resort on vacation isn't just a difference in preference, it is like this objectively wrong thing- wasting money when you could instead rent a vacation rental and cook your own slop.
I'm definitely a millennial. 32 years-old. Dad had internet in the house very early, can sort of remember before the internet, but grew up with it.
To your main point. Yes, I think you're right. Keeping up with the Joneses isn't new.
I tell this to people I know who move to certain expensive tech cities such as Seattle, NYC, or the Bay. Cities do have things, if you're using what they offer and accept the drawbacks it does not offend me. There is a real tendency for people to feel if they're not in one of these few places that they're missing out on important things. When, in actuality, most of them are weird engineers who spend a lot of time at home. With the internet you are not missing out on cultural experiences much anymore. Every city above 100k people in the US has a variety of people and restaurants these days. There's good things all over. And there's reasonable work all over.
I don't know where I'm going with this anymore. Just, I feel bad when I have friends try to show take me out in the city to another new restaurant not much different from the other ones and you can kind of see that they enjoy the constant novelty, but not on any deep level. Cities do provide easy distraction, but I think that's not always what's best for folks and it's not the true virtue of certain big cities.
I here you. I've lived in rural Colorado and now live in big city california. I see the appeal of both. And I absolutely hate it when people try to insist that one is objectively better than the other. They have advantages and disadvantages. These will line up differently for people depending on their tastes and life stages. When our kids were first born, being able to live near parents essentially on a quiet farm was awesome. As the kids grew older, we have appreciated the qualities of a major metropolitan area as well.
One of the best things libertarians ought to cultivate is the notion that "choosing something different than you" is not the same as "rejecting you as a person".
And, more than that, libertarianism and freedom requires a willingness to take risks and accept the consequences. And also being able to analyze those consequences reasonably.
I'm getting into a completely different topic now of the importance of being a Happy Warrior. That might be a more NR specific comment though.
My first house after college was on a 60’ lot in a medium sized city where I could walk to the local bar in 5 minutes, and could walk to the clubs and restaurants downtown in 20. Loved it then.
Now I live on 4 acres in the woods on a dirt road, where it’s a five minute drive to the local bar, ten minutes to the grocery store, and about 15 minutes for anything else. At this point in my life I prefer this.
Neither is better, it’s just preference. Although the house I lived in in-between in a subdivision of cookie cutter houses that required driving on a busy five lane highway to get anywhere sucked, and would have no matter when I would have lived there.
requiring them to come in to the office to work is oppressive and destructive to their mental health.
Along with literally everything else. Seriously, life is oppressive and destructive to mental health. Put on your big boy pants and deal with it.
"Life is pain, ... anyone who tells you different is selling something."
Pretty sure it's 'works' for those companies which are temporarily generating large profits, but (for instance) once Yahoo got some real competition, they canceled remote working.
There are those who are self-motivated, and they'll produce anywhere, remote or office.
Others not so much and that portion is costing money if they're not supervised. Management's job is to make money.
It also is working for very small companies that have a hard time finding specific talents in the narrow region they exist. So, you're a start-up in Milwaukee, there is some advantage of being able to cast a net over the entire US. There's many, many factors at play. Including individual personality. I seem to be doing okay with my work, and continue to get above average reviews and raises. I have heard stories from close friends of people at their company who basically fuck off the entire day.
Another reason to not get too caught up in any given side of Remote working and just let companies hash it out with their employees. I guess this is also an anti-union comment as well.
I have heard stories from close friends of people at their company who basically fuck off the entire day.
To be fair, I don't think that's unique to WFH. The old "80/20" rule (80% of the work is done by 20% of the workers) applies to in office work as well in my experience.
"once Yahoo got some real competition, they canceled remote working."
Not terribly important to the point, but it was actually a bit different. Yahoo was already getting its lunch eaten and was in a death spiral. When the new CEO came in, she saw that the parking lots were empty on Fridays and no one was coming into the office. She pulled records on WFH people and found they weren't even logging into their computer half the time. That is when she demanded that WFH was ending at the company.
It is hard to say if this worked. In the end, despite making MANY changes (free food, more equity grants, several product changes) Mayer failed to turn Yahoo around and it was ultimately sold to Verizon/AOL, and is now being parted out by private equity. But if you ask my opinion, it was a necessary thing. Yahoo needed to change its culture and over a period of months, the main campuses (Sunnyvale, New York, Champaign) had significant improvements. People were back to working past 4pm and the company launched several great products (Native advertising, Fantasy Sports, Premium Finance). Had the Obama administration not fucked over the company by preventing them from discharging their alibaba holdings, Yahoo very likely would still be around today as its own operating concern instead of the shell it is now.
While attitudes toward casual sex have largely loosened since the 1970s
WTF?
Yeah, that struck me as a lie of epic proportions too.
Someone never heard of the 60’s.
there are considerably fewer key parties in my 2020s neighborhood than there were for my parents in my '70s neighborhoods
Yeah, but there's also Tinder now, so there's not really any need to go to a key party if you want to have casual sex with someone.
my s.o. believes she'd be murdered the first time lol.
other than soccer, haven't heard much about Ukraine recently. I'm assuming Brandon has completed the coverup?
Putin and the Putineers doth prorest too much about Nazis, methinks:
White Power Mercenaries Fighting The Lost Cause Around The World
https://time.com/6180611/white-power-mercenaries-fighting-the-lost-cause/
"Wagner" isn't even ironic.
I'll have to use my translator app to find out how to say "Kill Da Wabbit!" in Russian.
You're not hearing much about Ukraine because the wrong people are being proven to be right.
I think it's more easily explained by short attention spans, combined with the fact that people really don't like a "bad guy wins" narrative.
We really need those longer term reporting and details though, because too many people think that things actually are a narrative instead of real events with real consequence.
It can be both. People’s attention spans have been plenty long for Covid.
That and there's more important things for the media to cover, like some lying celebutard bint being sued for falsely accusing her ex husband of abuse. That's way more important than Ukraine, inflation, Ghislaine Maxwell getting her sentence reduced, or the Durham investigation.
It ain't over yet.
It wasn't the polling win they were hoping for, so they've moved on to dead school children.
"Widespread reliance on punitive approaches to enforcing public health" harms marginalized groups, says Amnesty International. A new report from the human rights group Amnesty International suggests quarantine rules and other COVID-19 restrictions were especially damaging for groups already more likely to face discrimination, police harassment, and unjust criminalization. Amnesty International calls on governments to reject using criminal sanctions to implement public health goals and "refrain from implementing repressive policies" in the name of protecting pubic health.
Well, I guess if we have to go down the "women and minorities hardest hit" road, I'll take it.
While attitudes toward casual sex have largely loosened since the 1970s
Said the girl born After Twitter.
Fuck AI and the snowflake white pony they rode in on.
Repressed minorities can die from pandemics just like everybody else.
Right? And if all the minorities die, who's going to bring you your DooDash while you shelter in place?
Joe Friday still gets his meals the old fashioned way. Walks up the basement stairs to his mom’s kitchen.
"Maaawm! Where's my hotpockets!
Dammit mom! You know I can't go to the store myself, it's within 1000 yards of a playground zone!"
Going forward I’ll read all Joe Friday posts in this voice:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dI_sFFcssw8
Do libertrarians just have to be contrarians about drugs and female sex predators? It isn't that hard narcotics are illegal that makes people who are hopelessly addicted to them. It isn't that prostitutes arent female sex offenders that prostitution is illegal. For any honest egalitarian reason that's why they should be illegal. Prostitutes are illegal because pimps are illegal. It's actually because of egalitarianism that prostitution is illegal. Not for any legitimate reason mind you. I can't stand by this junky faggot vision of libertarianism.
We got our harmless weed back. Let the hard narcotic slime bags get systematically executed. The exact scum that made us all an afghan pederast heroin cartel, claiming focus on liberty?
Could you people honestly be any more disgusting? Even death row convicts would beat themselves to death if they knew what your dope was for and where it came from. It's for rape slaving little afghan boys. We found your dealer.
There's pedophilia, and then there's pedorasts.
You.
One should get you killed, assuming we're not talking about some delinquant child prostitute sex predators(seem to be the type that follows you around...) the other should get your whole country killed and whatever religion abided your existence.
So, anyone got a bright outlook for the future? or can we maybe guess where this kind of thing is going.
Note, weed is legal now. We can just drop the whole "drug war" rhetorical trash like it's going to get you killed. Cuz it's going to get you killed.
If drugs were all legal, you shit for brain junky faggot scum couldn't make any money at it anyway in an open market where there wasn't only brain dead junky faggot scum to do business with.
Instead you should be thanking someone for allowing your continued existence, cuz, it's trying every day to get them killed.