Colorado Police Officer Sued for 'Recklessly' Shooting Family Dog
The police department is the same one where an officer injured a 73-year-old woman with dementia last year.

A family is suing a police officer in Loveland, Colorado, and the town after they say the officer needlessly shot their dog in a 2019 incident.
A civil lawsuit filed in Larimer County District Court accuses Loveland police officer Mat Grashorn of "recklessly killing" Wendy Love and her husband Jay Hamm's 14-month-old dog, a Staffordshire terrier and boxer mix named Herkimer. The lawsuit alleges that Grashorn's shooting of Herkimer was an unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment and violated their constitutional rights.
On June 29, 2019, Grashorn was responding to a call from a business owner about a suspicious truck parked on the owner's commercial property when he encountered Love, Hamm, and their three dogs. The couple was making firewood deliveries that day, and according to the lawsuit, stopped in the parking lot to give the dogs some water.
Body camera footage released along with the lawsuit shows Grashorn stepping out of his police cruiser. Love and Hamm's other dog, Bubba, is sleeping on the ground but gets up and begins running toward the officer. Grashorn draws his gun on the dog, but the couple yells at the animal to come back. It pauses and turns toward its owners, but Herkimer jumps out of the truck and lopes toward Grashorn with its tail wagging. Grashorn shoots the dog. (The audio is not captured by the body camera, which retains 30 seconds of footage before it is turned on, but not sound.) Warning: graphic content below.
After the shooting, Grashorn refused to allow the distraught couple near Herkimer, ordering them to go back to their truck. When Hamm demanded to know why Grashorn had shot the dog, Grashorn yelled that he had "no way of knowing" whether Herkimer was friendly and that he "wasn't in the business to get bit."
The lawsuit says that Loveland police refused to let the couple retrieve their dog and take it to a veterinarian until a Loveland police supervisor arrived on the scene. Hamm was ticketed for having a "dangerous dog." The ticket was later dismissed by the district attorney.
Herkimer died four days after being shot. An internal review by the Loveland Police Department found the shooting was justified.
"This is yet another agonizing illustration of all that is wrong at the Loveland Police Department," Love and Hamm's attorney, Sarah Schielke, said at a press conference Wednesday. "Herkimer could have been any of our beloved pets. Dogs are our family. And he was shot dead in broad daylight. In the middle of suburbia. By the police. With no consequences to the officer whatsoever. And then found to be reasonable by his superiors. What in the actual hell is going on at the Loveland Police Department?"
Schielke also represents Karen Garner, a 73-year-old woman who filed a lawsuit in April claiming that a Loveland police officer fractured her arm and dislocated her shoulder after stopping her for allegedly shoplifting $13.88 worth of items from Walmart.
According to the lawsuit, Garner suffers from dementia and sensory aphasia, which makes it difficult for her to communicate and understand other people. Body camera footage of the June 26, 2020, incident showed the officer, Austin Hopp, stopping Garner as she was walking home and picking wildflowers. He threw Garner, disoriented and confused, to the ground after she didn't respond to his commands to stop.
Schielke later uncovered surveillance video from the Loveland Police Department showing Hopp watching the body camera footage with two other officers and joking about it. "Ready for the pop?" Hopp says to the other officer as they watch the video of him dislocating Garner's shoulder.
Hopp is now facing charges of felony assault, causing serious bodily injury, attempting to influence a public servant, and misconduct.
Last month, the city of Loveland settled a different wrongful arrest lawsuit for $290,000.
Reason has been covering sad incidents of "puppycide" like Herkimer's for decades now. In 2019, a Faulkner County, Arkansas, sheriff's deputy was fired and charged with animal cruelty after he casually shot a small dog because the owner refused to walk outside to talk to him. The shootings lead not only to devastated families and viral news stories, but expensive lawsuit settlements for cities. In 2019, St. Louis paid $775,000 to a woman whose dog was shot during a no-knock SWAT raid over an unpaid gas bill. The Detroit Police Department has settled a string of lawsuits for shooting dogs during drug raids.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Pull a gun and shoot my dog, I'm returning fire. The costume you are wearing is not relevant.
Start making money this time… Spend more time with your family & relatives by doing jobs that only require you to have a computer and an internet access and you can have that at your home.ryh Start bringing up to $65,000 to $70,000 a month. I’ve started this job and earn a handsome income and now I am exchanging it with you, so you can do it too.
You can check it out here………………Visit Here
The dog was clearly trespassing on public property, so a good shoot.
Right Jeffie?
Start making money this time… Spend more time with your family & relatives by doing jobs that only require you to have a computer and an internet access and you can have that at your home.QEr Start bringing up to $65,000 to $70,000 a month. I’ve started this job and earn a handsome income and now I am exchanging it with you, so you can do it too.
You can check it out here…..................VISIT HERE
Came here to say the thing. My dog is family and if someone killed her they would die a painful death.
I am making a good salary online from home.I’ve made 97,999 dollar’s so for last 5 months working online and I’m a full time student.QWe I’m using an online business opportunity I’m just so happy that I found out about it.
I highly recommend to everyone to apply...
Join this right now..................... VISIT HERE
Sure they would.
If you let an unleashed dog approach a person like that, you are arranging to have your dog get shot. Especially off your property, most especially when trespassing.
Buy a leash or buy a tissue.
The dumbass copy drove to the dog and got out. He invited the entire thing and I wish his gun had backfired and shot him instead, He's a total incompetent.
*cop, not copy
The officer responded properly to a call from the citizen who owned the relevant property. The dogs approached him, able to do so because the owners didn't properly control their animals.
Other than that, though, great comment!
Dirk Kirk.
Are you watching the same video that I am. The dog was approaching the police in a friendly matter. The office should be fired and sued.
If you have some free time on your hands, why not make some extra cash every week? Follow this link for more information....
JOBS APP
" Pull a gun and shoot my dog, I’m returning fire. "
Leash and control your animal. Otherwise, with that attitude, the police are welcome to shoot you, too.
Exactly. This officer had already demonstrated how trigger happy he was. Pulling a gun on even a good officer is a sure way to get yourself killed.
Kirkland I do not find that funny one bit. If you are serious you have a serious mental issue.
You want to defend a hayseed who says 'shoot my dog and I will shoot you?' In the context of an unleashed dog approaching an officer responding to a call from the relevant property owner?
Let the competent adults handle debate concerning this issue. That police officer already has been cleared. The civil claims will be bounced early and forcefully. The death of that dog was caused by its dumbass owners.
Incorrect the police killed the dog (Again did you not see the video?) The dog was wagging its tail in a friendly matter. Please answer the question.
I tend to agree with you, especially if the cop is on my property. The dog has my permission to be there; the policeman does not. A badge and a uniform does not give you the right to trespass and destroy my animal (my legal property) because you feel like it. If you’re scared, get off my land.
In this case, the property owner had called the police and asked the police to visit the property.
I'm surprised this hasn't happened yet. Police officers who kill family pets should face crimimal charges, just like anyone else would.
Good comment. I am from Chicago and I can assure you that cops are not only useless but are harmful and dangerous. The "Defund the Police: group are right. Get rid of all cops which will not only reduce cops' illegal shootings, but it will make decent citizens feel that they won't be harassed for no good reason. Cops do little to nothing to stop crimes or the criminals.
I wouldn't shot the cop, I'd hunt down and shoot his kid. Eye for an eye.
Disaffected, anti-social, superstitious, delusional, misfit clingers are among my favorite culture war casualties.
Defund cops? Nope, get rid of the fascist kill-happy assholes.
Maybe you shouldn't be on someone else's property with your unleashed dog and you should have it under control at all times. Sure you're gonna return fire.
At the end of the day, money talks. It is apparently the only way that police departments will train their officers to not view dogs as an opportunity to fire their weapons at something [alive].
The shooting was readily justified. No one -- including no officer -- is required to enable an unleashed dog to approach within a few feet. The 'money talks' angle here would have been a fine for failing to control the animal.
>>that he "wasn't in the business to get bit."
kinda are, asshole. hopes are high you lose everything.
Mailmen are in the business of getting bit. Cops are in the business of making people do whatever they say, and killing anything or anyone who gets in the way.
Dante had dog-shooting cops in mind.
I missed that chapter in the book. I must have read an abridged version.
Somehow firefighters run into emergency situations where everything is literally on fire potentially in the face of psychotic dogs without guns.
Guess that maybe needed a comma or two.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Does that help?
Blue state, what you get when you prop up democrats.
Cops never ask dogs to sit, lay down or give a paw. They always go straight to, “play dead.”
Cops shoot dogs because they know how much it hurts the owner. It's rarely if ever self defense. No, they kill pets right in front of their owners to be mean and because they know that nothing else will happen. "Oh, it was just a dog, get over it." Yet when someone defends themselves from a vicious police dog they are charged with capital murder.
There's another cop being sued, but for shooting a woman - explicitly to enforce government supremacy over the people
He just did an interview with NBC last night
I know. All she did was wag her tail and approach the officer like she wanted to be friends, and he shot her just to be mean to her owners.
Asshole.
the head of DHS says it is white supremacy , not government supremacy.
Dead dog, dead cop. That's the only way this shit will stop.
Sounds like a great chant for a parade!
"Dead Dog! Dead Cop!
That's how we make this Shit Stop!
Dead Dog! Dead Cop!
That's how we make this Shit Stop!
Dead Dog! Dead Cop!
That's how we make this Shit Stop!"
I thought all chants were supposed to start with 'hey hey, ho ho'.
That’s too 60s—IT’S GOTTA GO!!!
NO WOOF WOOF, NO PEACE!!!!
Control your animal -- off your property, unleashed, while trespassing -- or watch someone shoot it.
You get to whimper about it as much as your like.
Cities should control their badged animals.
The property owner had called the police and asked the police to visit the property. You seem disaffected and anti-social.
You seem to be a fucking asshole.
I don't want your approval, EdG. But your betters will have your compliance.
Every Libertarian spoiler vote is a shot fired across the bow of the force-initiating Kleptocracy. All else is vapid posturing.
Too for the cop bad Herkimer wasn't wearing a MAGA hat. No one would have cared about the shooting, and the cop would be declared a hero.
This is sarcs beliefe
I watched the video twice. The common sense thing for the cop to do was to get in his car and close the door since he was standing next to the car. He stated”I didn’t know that” after the woman stated that the dog was a puppy and was not going to attack him. The puppy is not growling or barking or showing it’s teeth. Stupid move by a stupid cop!
Would common sense have inclined the dog's owner to (1) leash his dogs, (2) stop the dog from approaching another person, (3) do something else -- off his property -- rather than let his dog get shot?
Hey reverend, I read all your comments. You obviously have a boring life! Don’t “reach” for some kind of logic to justify wrong decisions by cops. Regardless if the dogs were off leash and they were trespassing . Stick to the facts of the simple case. A dog ran toward an armed cop standing next to the door of his vehicle. The dog was not showing any aggressive behavior at all. What I said in my prior comment makes 100% logical sense and I’m sure many people would agree. Bottom line is he is a stupid cop and if he shot my dog in a situation like that he would get a lot more from me besides getting sued. Oh and by the way; I am 61 years old and have been working with pro dog trainers for years. Stick to being a preacher you’ll be more successful in making people believe your hypocritical act that you are smarter than everybody else by telling them how they should live their lives and treat each other while on this earth.
Kirkland, you cock -picker. You are also apparently a dog hater. Now I know that I really don't like you, you turd smoker.
Knowing you will spend the rest of your disaffected life complying with my preferences is solace enough for me. Being a culture war casualty has consequences, clinger.
What would Jesus do? I don't get the feeling you would know. What are you a "reverend" of? The Church of Satan?
Congregation Of Exalted Reason.
Jesus would have controlled his dog properly, if he were half as competent as his advocates claim.
From someone who lacks it. Anyone could see in the video the dog was coming up to the office in a friendly matter.
This cop's a fucking retard.
Or just an asshole.
I'm from a "cop family" and I know most of them are not bad people; some are actually quite decent. Unfortunately the profession has a tendency to draw those who are assholes and like to use the position as a means to stick it to anyone they can.
And it sure seems those particular kinds kill a lot of dogs. If one ever points a gun at my [people loving non aggressive] dog he or she will have to decide to back down or kill me in the process.
Well . . . bye!
I just got home from 2 days away from home doing field scouting. In Just over 2 days I encountered 6 dogs. All came trotting up to me barking. Never had a single problem. (my 4" Kershaw with speedsafe opening was less than a second from being deployed)
Another factor, farmers put down dogs that bite. There are no second chances. Biters are a liability
With cops, if all you have is a hammer, every problem is a nail.
If the only tool you have is a gun, every dog is life threatening.
I went to a business once, semi-rural area. Parked the car, got out, saw two good ole boys standing at the business's open rollup door, with a black lab. They said something to the dog, it came running at me, and was so very obviously happay and welcoming. I squatted, held out my hands, the dog and I hugged each other and had a good few seconds of saying hello. My new friend and I walked over to the business, said hello to my two new friends, we conducted our business, and it was a good time for all.
Christ. If you cannot tell from the way a dog is approaching you, from its body language, speed, manner of running, tail, teeth, ears, and everything else whether a dog is a threat or a pal, you should stay indoors all day. They have the transparency Obama lied about.
Another factor, farmers put down dogs that bite. There are no second chances. Biters are a liability
I would amend this. Dogs that bite can absolutely be trained not to bite or attack/bite selectively (given time and effort that a farmer may not or cannot invest; their dog, their call).
However, on more than one occasion, articles and videos have appeared here on Reason showing the methods that may be required, and such action automatically gets you lumped in with this POS. Even if it causes no physical harm to the dog.
Adendum to that, breeders, trainers, shelters, and animal control officers put down aggressive animals that could otherwise be trained not to bite all the time. Not, in any way to exonerate what this officer did, but it's not an animal control officer's job to train animals and it's not necessarily a breeder or trainer's job to get bit and lose money in an effort to save every last dog.
Even perfectly well-behaved dogs can freak out those who can't abide them. I have a family member who was mauled as a toddler. He'll get panicky when someone brings a chihuahua into his presence. We got a female beagle/terrier puppy once, with the idea that daily exposure to a family pet would desensitize him. Didn't work, and the pup, who had pretty much become "my dog" - I exercised her and cleaned up after her - got sent to the farm one Sunday.
Now, are the cops screening for candidates who phobic about dogs? When the FBI profiles serial killers, they look for animal abuse as a precursor behavior before someone starts in on fellow humans. How much of this is drug dealers train dogs to attack. Therefore, every dog is a potential attack dog. Even purse dogs and puppies. Assholes.
When the FBI profiles serial killers, they look for animal abuse as a precursor behavior before someone starts in on fellow humans.
This is a bit apocraphyl. They certainly take frequent, enjoyed, and/or criminal animal abuse for the sign that it is, but it's nowhere near a 1:1 correlation. And, even if they did, Boyd and Malvo demonstrated the inaccurate or somewhat spurious nature of FBI profiling. Especially, as I point out above, given the relatively whimsical nature of what any given person would call abuse.
Loads and loads of people burn ants with a magnifying glass (and enjoy it) without killing people. Loads and loads of people put tape on a cat's legs (and enjoy it) without killing anyone. Loads and loads of people tie firecrackers to all manner of objects, alive or dead, and set them off without killing anyone. Loads and loads of people enjoy a bullfight or cock fight without ever killing anyone. Loads and loads of people tie a top hat and monocle to Sir Mittens without ever killing anyone...
Agreed they should be screening for phobias. If you can't handle a dog or a spider without locking up or pulling a gun, you shouldn't get the job.
They who vote Dem or Gee-Oh-Pee, hire pigs to gun down you and me, (and our dogs)
Lol your 4"
Hope the family gets a huge judgement and this jerkoff cop gets fired.
The puppy was clearly and obviously wearing a collar. The looter was just as obviously firing a gun.
Grashorn should be executed. We have "no way of knowing" he will be friendly in the future - and we're not "in the business to get bit." by his shit again.
Agrewd
Have we reached the point where it's reasonable to be in fear for your life if a police officer approaches you, and therefore be justified in shooting said officer in self defense?
They're much less a threat than leftists
Though I do favor the death penalty for dog murderers
I do favor criminal prosecution of uniformed killers of others' dogs without cause/initiation of aggression.
Ask Straightjacket here...
Um... could you repeat the question?
Immediately before Reason finally gets around to an Ashli Babbitt story. And bungles it in typical Reason fashion. Unreal.
yes, you do seem obsessed with covering puppycide. But seemingly have no problem at all with Babbittcide. Fvck off
No, they didn't cover the Australia puppy executions
They did.
That's because babbit got what she deserved
Perhaps you passed over a premium headline. I'd have gone with:
Pusillanimous Police Portraying Peculiar Paranoia Who Put Down Passionate Puppy Pursued in Civil Jurisprudence
But then, I'm just odd that way.
Let me guess—-your favorite line from Hairspray was: “Penny Pingleton is positively permanently PUNISHED!!!”
Grashorn needs to be put out to grass.
The Australian authorities shot a whole bunch of dogs.
But I guess that's ok with Reason, because covid...
Nobody owned the dogs. As I point out above, breeders, trainers, vets, pet stores, and even rescue shelters put down domesticated dogs all the time for no other cause than "We can't handle them." And domesticated dogs don't form packs and harass livestock, people, and other pets.
It's really not that hard:
*Dog gets shot*
*Libertarians attack*
No! Bad Libertarian! Property rights! No! Stop initiating aggression!
*Someone else's dog gets shot*
*Libertarians attack*
Good libertarian! Yes, you're a good libertarian aren't you? You did a good job chasing away those evil theives and statists! Who loves liberty? You do! Yes you!
It's really not that hard people.
Libertarian: *growls at pedestrian on public sidewalk*
Quoth the rabid pack Republican.
"Republunz iz evul!" - Hank "Prevent rabies with more wild dogs!" Phillips
Biden and company just droned an ISIS leader.
He probably won't stop until he kills the suicide bomber that attacked the airport.
The Kleptocracy and Islam deserve each other
Not that the cop needed to shoot the dog, but dog owners need to keep their fucking dogs on leashes or train their dogs not to run up to strangers. It is absolutely not okay to have an unleashed dog that runs at people. They have no way of knowing the dogs intentions. I personally have been seriously bitten by a dog wagging it's tail and running at me while the owner shouted "he's friendly". Control your dogs.
Disaffected, anti-social, on-the-spectrum, oddball fans of reason.com do not want to hear your reasonable points.
There's Reason, then there's cowardly undoxxed sockpuppets--the slimy parasites the Kleptocracy sends over to fart in our elevator.
The sockpuppet blurted it, I believe it, that settles the science right there!
I get paid more than $160 to $170 per hour for working online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining this i have earned easily $16k from this without having online working skills.
This is what I do..↠↠↠READ MORE
It was an accident up and until the cop turned into captain asshole and wouldn't let their dog get help. Then he turned into a piece of shit.
Um… could you repeat the question?Latest Update
Ullu Webseries Download https://statusbaazar.com/2021/08/28/best-websites-for-ullu-web-series-downloading-how-to-download-ullu-web-series/
It Is Now Easier And More Realistic Than Ever Before In History To Make A Remarkable Income From The Comfort Of Your Own Home!
JOBS APP
Fantastic work-from-home opportunity for everyone… Work for three to eight a day and start getting paid in WeSd the range of 17,000-19,000 dollars a month… Weekly payments Learn More details Good luck…
See……………VISIT HERE
If you were looking for a way to earn some extra income every week... Look no more!!!! Here is a great opportunity for everyone to make $95/per hour by working in your free time on your computer from home... I've been doing this for 6 months now and last month i've earned my first five-figure paycheck ever!!!! Learn more about it on following link... READ MORE