Executive overreach

COVID-19 Is Leading State Lawmakers To Finally Restrain Governors' Emergency Powers

Even during a pandemic, major changes to laws and policies should be funneled through state assemblies.

|

The erratic and authoritarian ways governors across the country have responded to the COVID-19 pandemic have prompted state lawmakers to restrain the authority of the executive branch. This is good news for the separation of powers in state government and an opportunity for average folks to reclaim some autonomy.

For people in many states, governors have responded to the pandemic with a complicated and ever-shifting "Hokey Pokey" of demands and bans, many of which appeared to be completely unrelated to the actual science of the spread of the coronavirus. Some decisions, like New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo's demand that nursing homes take in elderly people infected with COVID-19, made the pandemic even worse.

It's supposed to be the province of lawmakers to decide what citizens must and must not do and pass laws that clearly explain these rules so that police and regulators can consistently and fairly apply them.

But governors and agents of the executive branch are given more flexibility to call the shots when an emergency comes around, and we've seen governors flex these emergency powers in harmful and oppressive ways that have failed to even serve their primary goal of stopping the spread of COVID-19. California Gov. Gavin Newsom is finally letting businesses and entertainment venues within the state serve more people indoors, months after Florida's Gov. Ron DeSantis did the same. Yet, the two states ended up with strikingly similar infection and death rates. California citizens have been fighting back and even winning.

Today Nick Niedzwiadek reports at Politico that lawmakers are attempting to recover some of their lost authority to define the rules:

Lawmakers in nearly every state in the country have introduced a combined 300-plus bills this year related to governor's emergency authority or executive action taken during the fight against Covid-19, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Only a fraction of those measures are likely to ultimately move out of committee, let alone be enacted into law, but the bills nevertheless reflect the considerable interest in recalibrating governors' emergency authorities.

Niedzwiadek initially frames the dispute as partisan in his lede: Republican Kentucky lawmakers passed several bills to restrain the emergency powers of Democratic Gov. Andrew Beshear. One of the bills limits the duration of the governor's emergency orders to 30 days unless the state's General Assembly approves an extension. Beshear vetoed the bills, but lawmakers overruled him.

But Niedwiadek then quickly expands the view to show that it's not really a partisan divide. Republican and Democratic lawmakers are now increasingly concerned even when somebody from their own party is governor.

Cuomo is an obvious example here. The Democrat-dominated New York Assembly voted in March to strip the governor of his emergency powers in the wake of the scandals consuming his office.

The same is true of Republicans in Ohio, who voted to override a veto by Republican Gov. Mike DeWine and pass a law that allows the Ohio Assembly to rescind standing orders by the state's health department, and creates an oversight and advisory committee to examine emergency health orders.

Governors may complain about this loss of authority, but they should look at California and consider the alternatives. Newsom now faces a recall election, and while partisanship may have initially fueled the effort, the reality is that his office's intrusive and often nonsensical rules on reopening within the state have caused economic harm to many, many citizens. The fact that organizers were able to gather enough signatures to recall a Democratic governor in a state with a Republican Party in deep decline (24.2 percent of voters) is a sign that voters don't want governors misusing their emergency powers for wide-ranging, long-term diktats.

While it may feel like COVID-19 spread like wildfire, long-term policies that alter what is allowed, what is forbidden, and what is mandated should be funneled through legislatures and debated.

NEXT: When Everything Is 'Systemic Racism,' People Will Tune Out the Term

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Only took a year, on geological and federal timescales that’s not terrible.

    The actual effect on lives though…thanks for nothing I guess.

    1. Now ask the question, would Shackford et al be writing articles like these if Trump had managed to win?

      1. USA Making money online more than 15$ just by doing simple work from home. I have received $18376 last month. Its an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regular x office job and even a little child can do this and earns money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info
        on this page…..VISIT HERE

    2. Single Mom With 4 Kids Lost Her Job But Was Able To Stay On Top By Banking Continuously $1500 Per Week kss With An Online Work She Found Over The Internet… Check The Details HERE…. Visit the given link……….. Visit Here

    3. Change Your Life Right Now! Work From Comfort Of Your Home And Receive Your First Paycheck Within A Week. No Experience Needed, No Boss Over YourBVG Shoulder… Say Goodbye To Your Old Job! Limitedcdew Number Of Spots Open… Find out how HERE……. Visit Here

  2. Art is a very unique thing for every art artist. If you are fond of art, Explore art trivia and grow your knowledge of art.

  3. Yeah, emergency powers should be saved for emergencies. It’s hard to call anything an emergency over a year later. How about we limit any fiat order to expire a maximum of 42 days* from the royal decree when we can say “so long and thanks for all the fish”?

    *Yes, the number is pretty much arbitrary as are most emergency orders.

    1. In Washington state, Jay Inslee used rolling four week orders to circumvent the time limits imposed on emergency orders.

    2. “…It’s hard to call anything an emergency over a year later…”

      Sorta like those calls to tech support: “Due to an unexpected volume of calls…”
      It’s been a year, you idiot.

  4. Is it just me or is Newsom beginning to look like a middle-aged lesbian?

    1. Lol. Slightly more than a little bit.

    2. Gosh, I see it. Short haircut, ill fitting, loose clothing, comfortable shoes….
      He only needs a pair of round wire framed glasses and a permanent scowl to complete his outfit.

    3. He’d look a lot better if he were doused in gasoline and set on fire.

      1. I’m surprised that hasn’t happened to him sooner.

    4. He looks like Justin Trudeau. Like the average 5th grade schoolyard bully could make him shit his pants and assume the fetal position.

  5. Even during a pandemic, major changes to laws and policies should be funneled through state assemblies.

    Good thing you specified “major” changes, since otherwise people might get the idea that last-minute changes to election laws might fall into that category.

  6. You think? I, along with many here and those I know have always believed this from an early age. I also knew to look both ways before crossing a street, not to touch a hot stove and, later with experience , don’t stick it in crazy.

  7. This executive authority is the origin of what really happened in sweden that was different. Sweden prohibited declaration of states of emergency in its Constitution and further down has prohibited ministerial rule in agencies. In its place, they have required legislation for all basic authority and an almost Japanese level of consensus seeking in its discussion and decision-making.

    When this virus came along, the public health agencies in Sweden did not have the legal authority to do what was being done in other places. Rather than yell at the clouds, they did what they did have the authority to do. But this is very different from how “Sweden’ is being spun.

    1. Which, of course, is totally irrelevant to the result, but as a cowardly piece of lefty shit, you’ll sweep that under a rug.
      Stuff your PANIC flag up your ass, stick first.

  8. I don’t know when it will be stop… The double mutant is more dangerous than the earlier one. Preying god to save us 🙁

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.