Study: Democratic Governors Feed the Prison-Industrial Complex
Electorally vulnerable Democratic governors have historically been tougher on crime than Republicans.

Republicans tend to get more blame than Democrats do for the terrible state of America's criminal justice system, with its overly punitive "tough-on-crime" policies and enthusiasm for mass incarceration. But new research published in Political Research Quarterly challenges this calculation. In looking at whether Democratic or Republican state leaders drive more carceral policies, Anna Gunderson—an assistant professor of political science at Louisiana State University—found that "Democratic governors who barely win their elections outspend and outincarcerate their Republican counterparts."
For her research, Gunderson examined three measures of tough-on-crime tactics—prison admission rates, overall incarceration rates, and state corrections budgets—alongside state election returns between 1982 and 2016.
In states and elections where Democratic governors only eked out a win, corrections spending rose by around $15 per capita. Gunderson also found "tentative evidence" that Democratic governors who had been in tight electoral contests increased incarceration rates and prison admissions, too.
The results highlight "Democrats' complicity in the expansion of the carceral state," Gunderson writes.
Why did electorally vulnerable Democrats get more carceral? "Democrats were afraid to look weak on crime and instead supported policies at least as punitive or even more punitive than their Republican counterparts," suggests Gunderson. They "adopted tough on crime measures to curry electoral favor and siphon voters who were voting Republican because of their crime platform."
As an example, she offers up Mario Cuomo, a Democrat (and father of current New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo) who served as governor of New York from 1983 to 1994. Cuomo "presided over a massive $7 billion prison construction program and added more prison beds to the state than all the previous governors in New York history combined," Gunderson writes. While he "once called the prison boom 'stupid,'" Cuomo changed his tune amid accusations of being soft on crime.
By now, the fact that Democrats (including President Joe Biden) were no better than their Republican counterparts about crime panic in the late 20th century is pretty well established. But Gunderson found this held true whether we're talking about the data from the '80s and '90s or from 2000–2016. For both time periods, "the results here suggest electorally vulnerable Democratic governors will prioritize punitive policies in an effort to woo voters," her paper states.
Ultimately, the results "throw a wrench into conventional understandings of the politics of punishment," suggests Gunderson. "These results suggest it is not only Democrats in particular regions or states, but all those that are facing stiff electoral competition that are pursuing these punitive policies."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So voters choose the person who promises to lock up the most people? Fuck voters. They're a bunch of assholes. Glad I'm not one.
Oh the self realization you lack. Lol.
Reminds me of the Mass. crime lab that was falsifying test results to get convictions.
"Electorally vulnerable Democratic governors have historically been tougher on crime than Republicans." - ENB
FFS. We already know that Democratic states and cities are tougher on "crime" then Republicans. Did we really need a study to figure this out? Of course, the crimes are mostly non-violent drug offenses by minorities.
Conclusion - Republicans are racists! And, soft on crime. And Ron Paul's followers are racists, because, you know, they don't support Democratic politicians and policies of locking up minorities for minor, non-violent offenses.
Speaking of Cuomo:
https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/17/politics/cuomo-ron-kim-nursing-home/index.html
Is it even possible that his high handed, bullying, and authoritarian tactics have finally turned on him?
So now he's issuing a statement that he "accepts responsibility" for what he said to the NY Congressman and a bunch of dilly dallying about not answering questions "quickly enough" and the "COVID Crisis" etc. etc. Sounds like duck and fuck to me.
So he is accepting responsibility for thousands of negligent homicides?
Sounds like he knows its his fault, knows his policy killed people and he is still the bestest and onlyest guy to take the blame and continue as Governor even though he has more than Charles Manson number of deaths on his head. . . But not his conscience.
Cuomo seems to exclude himself.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/gov-cuomo-rails-against-firestorm-brought-on-by-nursing-home-scandal-no-one-has-a-right-to-spread-lies/ar-BB1dQ8x6?ocid=msedgntp
That Florida governor was arresting people for reporting Covid deaths so I'm little confused on what exactly the FBI is investigating here.
Why did electorally vulnerable Democrats get more carceral?
the question was answered earlier in the piece: In states and elections where Democratic governors only eked out a win, corrections spending rose by around $15 per capita.
More spending is more spending. Pretending to be crime busters was the conduit for that.
Republicans were like the abusive violent asshole fathers and the Democrats were the apologetic wives who married these mfers.
That analogy is untenable. That's like blaming your shitty parenting on the neighbors.
Libertarians would be the pool boy in this scenario. Cool as shit and the guy the wife would prefer to fuck but ultimately completely powerless to do anything.
Right, that single data scientist who was arrested for illegally using systems she wasn't authorized to access.
I think the FBI saw that she did it.
why do you bother with this sock tony?
This is not surprising. Democrats have always been the best friend of correction officers and police unions on top of being the heirs to Jim Crow in the South; many southern states continued to elect dem governors through the 1990s. You also had big city democrat prosecutors in Philly, NYC, and Chicago who were eager to lock up and let their cops beat the shit out of whoever they wanted.
Not just that but a lot of prisons are run by private companies and there are all of the contractors. Same for the ICE detention centers. They all have lobbies. Prisons are big business.
Define a lot, because you definition of alot is probably vastly different than most. The private prisons are 12% of the prison population. The private prisons aren't driving the incarceration rate.
On a lighter note. The Illinois governers are personally committed to increesing prison populations.
Maybe if we just break off the fingers of our Politicians then we can end finger pointing. Pathetic press coverage truly sucks.
That would be Democrat Governors.