Rand Paul

Matt Welch Interviews Rand Paul About Afghanistan Withdrawal on Sirius XM

Also: Listen to Daniel Drezner talk World War III, and Nomiki Konst, Ben Dreyfuss, and Harry Enten discuss Joe Biden.


Last month, the libertarian-leaning Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.) introduced along with Sen. Tom Udall (D–N.M.) the American Forces Going Home After Noble (AFGHAN) Service Act, which would pull within one year all U.S. troops out of Afghanistan with the exception of diplomatic protection and intelligence operatives. The bill, which also sunsets the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) that the war has been fought under, makes manifest a theme Paul has sounded since entering the Senate in 2011—why not, at long last, declare victory and come home?

It's not just America's longest war that Paul wants to end. He wants no more troops in Syria, no more support for Saudi Arabia's war against Yemen, and no more end-of-fiscal-year spending boondoggles to keep the Pentagon perennially flush. In all of these efforts, the war skeptic is attempting to bend the ear of President Donald Trump, whose foreign policy track record and roster of advisers are decidedly mixed on the questions of intervention and deployment.

I am scheduled today to ask Paul about his Trump-whispering campaign, and related efforts to get the troops home from Afghanistan, during the second of my four-day hosting stint on Sirius XM Insight's Stand UP! with Pete Dominick program, which runs from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. ET on channel 121.

Since hair-sniffer Joe Biden had been scheduled to announce his candidacy for president Wednesday (it is now slated for Thursday, though I'll believe it when I see it), we have prepared an otherwise Biden-tastic episode to set the campaign mood. Guests include:

* Beloved Reason contributor Daniel Drezner, who will talk about his current issue (May) cover story, "Will Today's Global Trade Wars Lead to World War III?"

* Progressive media/politics New York character Nomiki Konst, who will talk about some of Biden's policy and personality problems.

* Mother Jones Editorial Director Ben Dreyfuss, who will talk about how maybe Democratic Twitter isn't exactly the Democratic Party, and what that might portend for the Biden conversation.

* CNN politics number-cruncher Harry Enten, who will divine what the numbers say about Biden and the rest of the field.

You can call throughout the program at 1-877-974-7487.

NEXT: Brickbat: Hot or Not?

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. First rule of Trump-whispering campaign…

  2. The real question I want to know from Paul is what he thought of that 5 minute major against the Golden Knights!

    1. I mean on the one hand, Pavelsky was absolutely flattened by a cross check into Stasny who blew through him like he was cheap toilet paper, leading to waking up in a pool of his own blood.

      On the other hand, it wasn’t like Pavelsky was blind sided while sitting on his riding lawn mower or anything. He saw the cross check coming right at him.

    2. Talk about poking a sleeping bear… There was absolutely no reason to cross-check Pavelski there.

      Do I think it should have been a major, no. But it was an insanely stupid penalty to take at that point in the series.

      1. I guess- it seemed to me like pretty much what happens in every face off inside your zone. If you lose the faceoff, you skate up and get the opposing team out of your slot. The problem here was that Pavelsky was in mid turn around. 9 times out of 10, that encounter ends with Pavelsky stumbling back or falling on his butt. Just this time, he was turning and got wrapped up with Stasny.

        At the end of the day, I think the call was right- there was a cross check and there was an injury. The rules are clear that this is a major. It is a bummer on both sides.

        As an Avs fan, I am happy to see the Sharks. Of the two teams, San Jose is the most beat up and tired.

  3. Does Rand Paul support open borders? If not, he’s not a real libertarian and we should want nothing to do with him.

  4. “the libertarian-leaning Sen. Rand Paul”

    If “libertarian-leaning” these days means emerging from a visit to the Oval Office with a suspcicously orange nose, then yeah, he’s leaning. Up the president’s crack.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.