Nabbing Robert Kraft Helped Florida Prosecutors Get Headlines. Now Kraft and Other Orchids of Asia Customers Are Fighting Back
They're joined by an arrested spa owner and manager in fighting the release of surveillance video, with an array of big media companies on the other side.

On Tuesday morning, Florida Judge Leonard Hanser agreed to temporarily seal the footage of New England Patriots' owner Robert Kraft visiting Orchids of Asia spa in Jupiter, Florida.
More than two months have now passed since the headline-grabbing busts there and at several Southeast Florida massage parlors, places police insisted on national TV were dens of sexual slavery. Since then, authorities have been forced to admit that their claims were unfounded and have had their use of hidden cameras challenged by both men charged with soliciting prostitution and massage customers not accused of illegal activity.
That Kraft was one of the men charged by Florida prosecutors helped propel this story across national news and give it sticking power. But it's also assured that there's a defendant with resources and a reason to fight back—and in turn, that the press has remained interested in the case. (It's a beautiful bit of irony, all told.) Kraft rejected a plea deal offered by prosecutors and has pleaded not guilty.
He's also fighting the disclosure of footage from secret video cameras police installed for days at Orchids of Asia. And there seems to have been a ripple effect, with lawyers for other solicitation defendants fighting back, too.
Last month, 15 of the men charged with solicitation in Jupiter filed a joint motion seeking to prevent the public release of imagery from the hidden cameras. Although defendants "dispute the position of the prosecutors that there may be a 'victim' of any offense at issue in these cases, that mere possibility provides an additional basis for maintaining the confidentiality of the materials," states their motion.
A court hearing on the video issue was last held April 12. At that hearing, Assistant State Attorney Greg Kridos said neither state prosecutors nor Jupiter Police opposed release of the video and in fact were planning to release pixelated versions.
Kridos also defended the use of cameras in the first place, saying that they had initially suspected human trafficking may have been at play. He admitted, however, that no such trafficking horrors had actually been found.
"There was nothing approaching the showing of necessity that the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution requires," argued Kraft's lawyers in a March 28 motion. Police "did not seek (or receive) a probable cause finding regarding any human trafficking crimes under Florida law," and "any suggestion of human trafficking being suspected was unfounded and irresponsible. Indeed, law enforcement peddled these falsehoods to try and manufacture a patina of necessity here, where none exists." What's more, information told to a judge to get the warrant for video surveillance relied on "descriptions of statements made by a health inspector, Ms. Herzog" that were in direct contradiction with what Herzog herself said in a signed report, they say.
Kraft's lawyers call the video evidence "the fruits of an unlawful sneak-and-peek search warrant" and condemn authorities for resorting "to the most drastic, invasive, indiscriminate spying conceivable by law enforcement—taking continuous video recordings of private massages in which customers would be stripping naked as a matter of course—in order to prosecute what are at most (according to Florida's own allegations) misdemeanor offenses."
Opposing Kraft and the other defendants on this issue are the Associated Press, ESPN, Gannett Co. , GateHouse Media, ABC, the McClatchy Company, The New York Times Company, Orlando Sentinel Communications Company, Sun-Sentinel Company, and TEGNA (owner of local TV stations WTSp-TV and WTLV/WJXX).
"Defendants have made no valid justification for preventing access to records made public by [Florida's constitution and law]," states a March 26 motion from the media companies. "The surveillance videos are no different than other records and become public once turned over in discovery. Any purported privacy concerns do not, and cannot, prevent disclosure."
During the April 12 hearing, Kraft attorney William Burck pointed out that they have not sought to review the video evidence themselves as part of the discovery process, since that would make the videos public record.
A lawyer for the media companies fired back that that doesn't matter, since the state did not exempt the video from public disclosure. "It's a public record right now unless and until this court finds another reason that it should be held back," Dana J. McElroy said.
That court did just that, at least temporarily. In his ruling today, Judge Hanser wrote that Kraft's "right to a fair trial requires the disputed videotape be withheld…for a limited duration"—until a jury is sworn in, a pleas deal is accepted, or prosecutors drop the case.
"Law enforcement and the state have receded from [the] position" that human trafficking was involved, noted the judge. And everyone acknowledges that the events in question are described fully in police reports. "Clearly, these videotapes are not being sought for the purpose of assistance to identify and apprehend a perpetrator," Hanser continued, finding "that preventing access at this time to the videotapes sought by the [media groups] is necessary to prevent a serious and imminent threat to justice."
Meanwhile, men and women who visited Orchids of Asia and were not charged with any crimes have brought their own federal class-action lawsuit against Florida law enforcement. The 31 Jane and John Does are seeking unspecified damages, saying their privacy rights were violated by Jupiter Police Department's filming them stripping down and getting massages.
Hua Zhang and Lei Wang, a massage-business owner and manager arrested as part of the operation, have also been seeking to prevent widespread release of the surveillance video. Zhang and Wang's lawyers say some footage was already leaked and is being shopped around to media.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Fake news media loves the surveillance state.
Five fingers of
mind blowing blissdeath.ESPN is fighting to get the video of a 70-80 year old guy getting a hand job?? Go fuck yourselves you assholes. Mind your own fucking business!
ESPN is also in the fucking business?
They’re in the getting fucked by the consumer business. Numbers are down. You want to fuck up a fairly bullet proof Monday night football, you want to wheel out the same pretentious bald douche bag every night for sports center, and you roll a video of a 80 year old widower who wants to get a hand job from a woman who’d gladly take 200 an hour to give happy endings, in the New York vernacular, they can go fuck themselves.
What wrong with being bald, douchebag?
More irony: Mabel Willebrandt defended 1920s working girls busted by the Los Angeles soft machine by moving that the alleged customers be subpoenaed for testimony. Charges vanished instantly. Later, as Assistant Attorney-General, Mabel went on to wreck the 4th and 5th Amendments for the sake of the 16th and 18th, and helped wreck the U.S. economy in the bargain.
While normally I would agree that full access to evidence is good, this amounts to both blackmail and revenge porn on the part of police.
"You take the plea agreement or we post pornography on you on every new channel on the planet."
This is literally a felony being committed on the part of the police and the media are being complicit on this.
Putting all the Police department on the sex offender registry would be fun. Harvesting their pension funds would be even funnier.
At least dragging them through the courts and having them justify their actions would be fun.
That is an interesting take for the media company lawyers, given that the defendants are asserting that the original warrant was invalid. If this is their position with respect to a warrant that is opposed and later invalidated at trial, that would imply that the police could lie about you, plant a camera in your bedroom for a couple of weeks, shooting 24x7 video and audio, have that video become part of discovery and then it automatically becomes a public record that cannot be opposed or suppressed.
So then the judge quashes the video for your trial - which never happens - but two weeks of your private bedroom habits are now published for the world to see.
Talk about "the process is the punishment!"
Say what you want about what they did in Jupiter, FL to Kraft, they pulled far more extreme public shaming BS in King County Washington under Dan Satterberg and not only was he never held accountable for threatening those who going to trial with extreme public shaming, the law enforcement booster over at the Seattle Times celebrated dan for his clever ability to short circuit both the civil and constitutional rights of the accused.
https://reason.com/2016/09/09/the-truth-about-us-sex-trafficking
[…] Click here to view original story: Nabbing Robert Kraft Helped Florida Prosecutors Get Headlines. No… […]
That screen name is off the chain.
so.... the police violate the privacy rights of both massage parlor employees and customers during private encounters in varying stages of undress and possibly while committing intimate acts. Then they threaten to put them in cages for normal consensual adult activity. Now, they're threatening to release the videos of these private encounters to the public. That's three despicable crimes. If any citizen outside law enforcement behaved like this, we would label them a sex offender and put them behind bars for many years. But if the police do it, it's somehow a good thing and normal policing? Now, just to maintain their privacy and in some cases, their freedom and reputation, these victimized citizens have to hire lawyers and file a lawsuit. And somehow completely uninvolved third parties are able make an argument in this case, to argue for release of these improperly obtained videos? WTF? We have a completely f'd up legal system, both civil and criminal.
Say what you want about what they did in Jupiter, FL to Kraft, they pulled far more extreme public shaming BS in King County Washington under Dan Satterberg and not only was he never held accountable for threatening those willing to go to trial with the most extreme type of public shaming campaign, the law enforcement boosters over at the Seattle Times actually celebrated Dan's ability to short circuit both the civil and constitutional rights of the accused. In Seattle, they call that being "a progressive prosecutor."
https://reason.com/2016/09/09/the-truth-about-us-sex-trafficking
Very interesting and so disturbing. Thanks for the infor.
Unfortunately, I don't see any happy ending here.
Lei Wang.
[…] worker arrested. Another woman has been arrested for prostitution in conjunction with January video surveillance at a Palm Beach County, Florida, massage parlor and the arrest of workers, managers, and customers there. The woman’s identity and alleged […]
[…] Another woman has been arrested for prostitution in conjunction with January video surveillance at a Palm Beach County, Florida, massage parlor. […]
[…] worker arrested. Another woman has been arrested for prostitution in conjunction with January video surveillance at a Palm Beach County, Florida, massage parlor and the arrest of workers, managers, and customers there. The woman’s identity and alleged […]
[…] The attorneys for the other charged men quickly followed suit, and a judge responded accordingly: […]
[…] the disappointment of some media outlets, a judge last week temporarily blocked the public release of surveillance video from the Palm Beach spas. A final decision is still […]
[…] the disappointment of some media outlets, a judge last week temporarily blocked the public release of surveillance video from the Palm Beach spas. A final decision is still […]
[…] the disappointment of some media outlets, a judge last week temporarily blocked the public release of surveillance video from the Palm Beach spas. A final decision is still […]