Most U.S. Attorneys in States With Legal Pot Don't Seem to Be Planning a Crackdown

Eight out of 13 have indicated that Jeff Session's marijuana memo won't affect their prosecutorial decisions.



The federal government "shutdown" that ended yesterday highlighted the tenuous legal position of state-licensed marijuana merchants, who are worried about a possible crackdown in light of Attorney General Jeff Sessions' January 4 memo rescinding guidelines that had discouraged federal prosecutors from targeting them. The new continuing resolution, which expires on February 8, renewed the spending rider that bars the Justice Department from interfering with the implementation of state medical marijuana laws, which may also be included in whatever spending bill comes next. But since attempts to expand the rider beyond medical marijuana so far have been unsuccessful, the fate of cannabusinesses serving the recreational market still lies in the hands of U.S. attorneys across the country. Here is a rundown of what U.S. attorneys in the nine states with legal recreational pot have said about marijuana enforcement since Sessions issued his memo, which told them to apply the DOJ's "well-established general principles" in deciding which cases to pursue.


U.S. Attorney Bryan Schroder, a Trump appointee confirmed last November, issued a statement on January 4. "The U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Alaska will continue to use the long-established principles of federal prosecution to determine what cases to charge," he said. "One of the key principals [sic] is to follow federal law enforcement priorities, both at the national and local levels. The highest priorities of the U.S. Attorney's Office in Alaska are consistent with those of the Justice Department nationally: combating violent crime, including as it stems from the scourge of drug trafficking. Consistent with those priorities, the U.S. Attorney's Office released an Anti-Violent Crime Strategy in October of the past year. We will continue to focus on cases that meet those priorities."


Adam Braverman, appointed by Sessions last November as interim U.S. attorney for the Southern District of California (which includes San Diego), issued a statement on January 4. "The Department of Justice is committed to reducing violent crime and enforcing the laws as enacted by Congress," he said. "The cultivation, distribution, and possession of marijuana has long been and remains a violation of federal law. We will continue to utilize long-established prosecutorial priorities to carry out our mission to combat violent crime, disrupt and dismantle transnational criminal organizations, and stem the rising tide of the drug crisis."

Nicola Hanna, whom Sessions appointed on January 3 as interim U.S. attorney for the Central District of California (which includes Los Angeles), has not addressed his boss's memo on marijuana enforcement.

McGregor Scott, a Trump appointee, took office as the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of California, which includes Sacramento, in December. His office issued a statement on January 5. "The cultivation, distribution and possession of marijuana has long been and remains a violation of federal law for all purposes," it said. "We will evaluate violations of those laws in accordance with our district's federal law enforcement priorities and resources."

Brian Stretch, the U.S. attorney for the Northern District of California (which includes San Francisco), resigned on the same day Sessions sent his memo, although he said the two developments were not connected. Sessions is expected to name an interim U.S. attorney to replace Stretch. Meanwhile, the acting U.S. attorney is Alex Tse, formerly the first assistant U.S. attorney, who has not discussed marijuana enforcement in light of Sessions' memo.


Bob Troyer, whom Sessions picked as the interim U.S. attorney for Colorado last November, issued a statement on January 4. "The United States Attorney's Office in Colorado has already been guided by these principles in marijuana prosecutions—focusing in particular on identifying and prosecuting those who create the greatest safety threats to our communities around the state," he said. "We will, consistent with the Attorney General's latest guidance, continue to take this approach in all of our work with our law enforcement partners throughout Colorado."


U.S. Attorney Halsey Frank, a Trump appointee who was confirmed in October, issued a statement on January 9:

We must proceed on a case-by-case basis, individually assessing each matter according to DOJ's Principles and deciding whether to use our resources to pursue it. DOJ's national priorities include the rule of law, national security and terrorism, immigration, violent crime and international gangs such as MS-13, the opiate crisis, supporting law enforcement, and promoting public confidence. In addition, our local priorities include domestic violence and guns, human trafficking, and elder fraud. We will work with our federal, state, local and tribal partners to focus on those who pose the greatest threat to the people and communities that we serve.

With respect to the prosecution of drug offenses, this office has prioritized the prosecution of cases involving the trafficking of opiates, cocaine, crack and similar hard drugs. We have also prosecuted large-scale marijuana distribution organizations and did so even while operating under the recently rescinded DOJ guidance. Prosecution of drug possession cases has not been a priority.


U.S. Attorney Andrew Lelling, a Trump appointee who took office in December, issued a statement on January 8:

I understand that there are people and groups looking for additional guidance from this office about its approach to enforcing federal laws criminalizing marijuana cultivation and trafficking. I cannot, however, provide assurances that certain categories of participants in the state-level marijuana trade will be immune from federal prosecution.

This is a straightforward rule of law issue. Congress has unambiguously made it a federal crime to cultivate, distribute and/or possess marijuana. As a law enforcement officer in the Executive Branch, it is my sworn responsibility to enforce that law, guided by the Principles of Federal Prosecution. To do that, however, I must proceed on a case-by-case basis, assessing each matter according to those principles and deciding whether to use limited federal resources to pursue it.

Deciding, in advance, to immunize a certain category of actors from federal prosecution would be to effectively amend the laws Congress has already passed, and that I will not do. The kind of categorical relief sought by those engaged in state-level marijuana legalization efforts can only come from the legislative process.


Dayle Elieson, whom Sessions appointed as interim U.S. attorney for Nevada the day before he issued his memo, has not discussed how it might affect her prosecutorial priorities.


Billy Williams, who has served as U.S. attorney for Oregon since 2015 and was nominated by Trump last November to remain in that position, was cautious in a January 5 interview with The Oregonian. "I want to be methodical and thoughtful about what we do here in the District of Oregon," he said, saying he does not "believe in overreacting." But Williams also worried that Oregon continues to feed the black market in marijuana, which he called a "huge problem."

Williams elaborated on that concern in a January 12 opinion piece published by the same paper. "Oregon has a massive marijuana overproduction problem," he said. "In 2017 alone, postal agents in Oregon seized 2,644 pounds of marijuana in outbound parcels and over $1.2 million in cash….Overproduction creates a powerful profit incentive, driving product from both state-licensed and unlicensed marijuana producers into black and gray markets across the country. This lucrative supply attracts cartels and other criminal networks into Oregon and in turn brings money laundering, violence, and environmental degradation." Williams also expressed concern about underage use, drugged driving, and marijuana-related hospital visits, saying he is waiting to see how the state addresses these issues before "charting a path forward for the enforcement of marijuana in Oregon."


Gov. Phil Scott signed a legalization bill yesterday. Unlike the ballot initiatives approved by voters in the eight other states that have legalized recreational use, Vermont's new law does not authorize commercial production and distribution—just possession and home cultivation. U.S. Attorney Christina Nolan, a Trump nominee who took office in November, does not seem to have addressed the implications of Sessions' memo.


Annette Hayes, who has been the interim U.S. attorney for the Western District of Washington (which includes Seattle) since 2015, issued a statement on January 4, saying the principles to which Sessions alluded have always guided her office. "As a result," she said, "we have investigated and prosecuted over many years cases involving organized crime, violent and gun threats, and financial crimes related to marijuana. We will continue to do so to ensure—consistent with the most recent guidance from the Department—that our enforcement efforts with our federal, state, local and tribal partners focus on those who pose the greatest safety risk to the people and communities we serve."

Joseph Harrington, whom Sessions appointed as interim U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Washington (which includes Spokane) on January 4, issued a statement the following day. Like Hayes, he said the principles mentioned in Sessions' memo "have always been at the core" of what his office does. He said his office "will continue to ensure, consistent with the most recent guidance from the Department of Justice, that its enforcement efforts with our federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement partners focus on those who pose the greatest safety risk to the communities in Eastern Washington, by disrupting criminal organizations, tackling the growing drug crisis, thwarting violent crime, and corralling white-collar fraudsters in this District."


Even the DOJ guidelines that Sessions withdrew did not "immunize a certain category of actors from federal prosecution," as Lelling, the U.S. attorney in Massachusetts, puts it. While U.S. attorneys since 2013 generally have refrained from prosecuting marijuana suppliers who follow state law, there was never any guarantee to that effect, and none will be forthcoming until Congress changes federal law. But Oregon's Billy Williams is the only U.S. attorney in these nine states who has indicated he might be contemplating a cannabis crackdown, a decision he said would depend on how well the state controls the problems that concern him. Four U.S. attorneys, two in California and one each in Nevada and Vermont, have not said anything about Sessions' memo. The remaining eight have indicated that it will not affect their prosecutorial practices.

NEXT: A.M. Links: Earthquake Triggers Tsunami Warning for Alaska, Indian Prime Minister Champions Free Trade at Davos, Inspiration for 'Rosie the Riveter' Dies at 96

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. …the fate of cannabusinesses serving the recreational market still lies in the hands of U.S. attorneys across the country.

    If only the GOP was truly federalist. If only the Democrat Party was civil libertarian.

    1. I’m making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.

      This is what I do…

  2. It’s just kind of legal, we still can bust you if we feel like it. Better keep on your toes.

  3. What part of ILLEGAL don’t they understand?

  4. That’s a whole lot of words from a bunch of bureaucrats to basically say “Proceed at your own risk. We may or may not send armed ‘roided up goons try to throw you into a rape cage.”

  5. To have a federal law not enforced, the surest way is to get it repealed. Depending on executive inaction is a sucker’s bet.

    1. True. It did strike me as kind of odd that members of Congress were upset that the Attorney General intended to enforce a law that Congress itself had passed.

      Here’s an idea! If you don’t want the law enforced, repeal it! Then the AG wouldn’t have a law to enforce, would he?

      1. *Repeal* a law?! What kind of message would *that* send to the children?!

      2. What? You actually want Congress to do their job? That’s crazy talk!

  6. cannabusinesses

    OK, I was only a part of the legalize it movement when I thought the mind altering experience of MJ was going to put an end to shitty portmanteaus like this. One more bullshit pun or word play about ‘joint decisions’, ‘high expectations’, or ‘THC-you later’ and I’m gonna back Sessions.

    1. But plant leaves kill babies!

  7. I wonder if Trump will get credit for Sessions not being that bad. Or at least Trump is telling Sessions to ease up on states with legal marijuana. Sessions does seem to be better than the last attorney generals since at least 2000.

    Part of me wants a federal crackdown based on unconstitutional drug laws, so most Americans will just demand those laws are repealed.

    1. Sessions is awful. But, considering the last few decades of AGs, he’s in good company. The bar is pretty low.

      Sessions is somewhat restrained by public support for legalization, and already-operating economies in various states. But there’s a problem with that. While it has taken decades for the public to approach reason on this issue, the public is often very wrong on other issues.

      The reasoning for removal from federal scheduling, aside from the fundamentally questionable scheduling in the first place, should be based on evidence, not public opinion. This would be so even if drug laws hypothetically passed Constitutional muster.

      1. “…should be based on evidence, not public opinion.”

        Are you saying federal scheduling of certain substances is acceptable. I don’t think so based on the rest of your comment but then why must pot be legalized based on evidence instead of public opinion. Honestly, neither is an appropriate argument for or against federal drug law. It’s not in the Constitution, save some twisted interpretation of the Commerce Clause or some such. Science, public opinion or “the children” shouldn’t have any bearing on the matter. It is a state issue and even then, just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should.

    2. “I wonder if Trump will get credit for Sessions not being bad…”

      Assuming Trump told Sessions to hold back the U.S. Attorneys from beginning prosecutions again, maybe.

      I think its more likely that limited resources and the political reality of potentially pissing off a lot of people in their states is a bigger reason for why the U.S. Attorneys aren’t re-starting the War on Cannabis yet.

  8. “One of the key principals [sic] is to follow federal law enforcement priorities, both at the national and local levels.”


  9. The DA responses are great.

    “Oh we read the guidelines, and they’re just swell. Anyway, he’s what we actually care about.”

  10. Jeff – I’m smoking some weed right now. Try to arrest me.


  11. But Williams also worried that Oregon continues to feed the black market in marijuana, which he called a “huge problem.”

    That “huge problem”. The solution already exists, in the form of removing marijuana from the Schedule. That’s aside from the fundamental problem of regulating what grown adults put into their body with the law.

    Schedule 1 criteria:

    The drug or other substance has a high potential for abuse.

    “Abuse” is highly subjective. At the very least, this is inconsistent with already legal, taxed drugs such as alcohol and tobacco.

    The drug or other substance has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States.


    There is a lack of accepted safety for use of the drug or other substance under medical supervision.


    1. WA, OR, and CA feed a huge amount of pot into the black market. If you’re in some other state and buy some top flight weed, odds are it’s from one of those states. Most likely from the NW for the best of the best.

  12. Maybe some Reason operatives thought this was gonna be a big deal, but it never was going to be.

    This was virtue signalling by Sessions, just like church-going is for Trump.

  13. Beauregard need only pick up the phone and SWAT the homes of scofflaw state legislators like Herbert Hoover and Harry Anslinger would’ve done. Once their kids and dogs are all bleeding out from multiple service pistol wounds distributed by Gee-Oh-Pee dedicated First Responders? they’ll turn their colors, just yew watch!

    1. Goddamn you’re a fucking weirdo. Do you really believe the stupid shit you write? Do you actually use the same phrasing in conversations with people? If so, are you currently a resident of a mental institution?

  14. “Williams also worried that Oregon continues to feed the black market in marijuana, which he called a “huge problem.””

    Oregon could probably help reduce this problem by lowering the tax and regulatory burden that make the legal market more difficult to buy and sell in. But the larger problem is of course the nearby states that still have prohibition in place along with it still being illegal on the federal level. As long as prohibition is still the preferred national policy and the preferred policy of Oregon’s neighboring states the black market will continue to boom.

    1. Oregon’s neighbors that prefer prohibition are quickly dwindling. They’re almost surrounded.

    2. Legal weed suffers from quality issues too, largely due to less quality control in mass production and producers being hamstrung by excessive cultivation regulations. With a decent grow room and the right strains, one could produce shit at home that blows away 95+% of the shit sold at the legal cannabis stores.

  15. Finally! There is a great way how you can work online from your home using your computer and earn in the same time… Only basic internet knowledge needed and fast internet connection… Earn as much as $3000 a week..


Please to post comments

Comments are closed.