USDA to Farmers: Be a Patriot! Grow Cannabis!
Friday A/V Club: When one war interrupts another


The crackdown on industrial hemp, like the crackdown on its psychoactive cousin marijuana, took off in the 1930s. But for a brief interval in the '40s, Washington reversed itself: With World War II disrupting access to the usual fiber sources, the U.S. Department of Agriculture urged American farmers to grow the crop for the war effort. The short film Hemp for Victory was a product of that push, with a narrator offering such quotable nuggets as "In 1942, patriotic farmers at the government's request planted 36,000 acres of seed hemp" and "For the sailor no less than the hangman, hemp was indispensable."
After the war the film was filed away and forgotten. When some legalization activists tried to dig up a celluloid copy nearly 50 years later, the USDA employees that they spoke with reportedly denied that it ever existed. But eventually they acquired it, and in the early '90s the movie became a cult item in certain drug-reform circles—a sort of an anti-Reefer Madness that a local NORML chapter might screen at an event. Removed from its original context, what once had been an ordinary ag film now felt like a secret history crossed with a camp classic.
In those days, a haze of disreputability hovered over anything even peripherally connected to marijuana. Today that smoke has thinned a lot when it comes to pot, and even more it comes to the kind of cannabis that won't get you high. A pilot program in Kentucky has more than 200 farmers growing industrial hemp legally in a famously conservative state; this week the Maryland General Assembly held hearings on whether to enact something similar in its domain. (For more on Kentucky's experiment and Maryland's interest, see my wife's paper on the subject, which I blogged on Wednesday.) In that environment, Hemp for Victory may not have as much of a giggle factor it had a quarter century ago. But it's still a remarkable artifact—not just of the time when it was made but, in a different way, of the time when it was rediscovered:
(For past editions of the Friday A/V Club, go here.)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Get the munchies for Uncle Sam or something..what were we talking about?
Heavy!
I'm ready to do my part, sign me up! ...oh, you said hemp for victory. Never mind.
Fatties need not apply [/aggressing]
As always, a coherent vision and consistent policy from the gubment. Some things never change.
RE: USDA to Farmers: Be a Patriot! Grow Cannabis!
This title can't be correct because it makes sense.
Damn I'm smoking some good shit today!
I always love watching these old black and white shorts, reminds me of the Encyclopedia Britannica movies they used to show us in elementary school.