DOJ Accepts Decision Saying It May Not Target State-Legal Medical Marijuana Suppliers
The feds had argued that a spending rider left them free to shut down dispensaries.

The Justice Department has abandoned its appeal of a ruling that said federal prosecutors are breaking the law when they target medical marijuana providers who comply with state law. U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer issued that ruling last October, when he said enforcing an injunction against a state-legal dispensary would violate a spending rider that prohibits the DOJ from interfering with state laws allowing medical use of marijuana. The Justice Department initially asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit to overturn Breyer's decision but later changed its mind, and on Tuesday the court granted its request to withdraw the appeal.
That decision leaves in place Breyer's ruling, which involved the Marin Alliance for Medical Marijuana (MAMM), without establishing a circuit-wide precedent. Presumably the DOJ worried that the 9th Circuit would agree with Breyer's reading of the Rohrabacher-Farr amendment, which says the department may not use appropriated funds to "prevent" states from "implementing" their medical marijuana laws. The DOJ argues that prosecuting medical marijuana suppliers, seizing their property, and shutting them down does not prevent implementation of laws authorizing them. Breyer said that interpretation "defies language and logic."
The rider that Breyer considered expired last year, but the same language was included in the omnibus spending bill for the current fiscal year. If Congress continues to renew the amendment and other courts agree with Breyer's understanding of it, medical marijuana growers and suppliers who comply with state law will have less reason to worry about raids, arrests, and forfeiture actions, although uncertainty will remain in states where the rules for dispensaries are unclear. For the time being, that remains true in California, although state regulations aimed at clarifying the situation are scheduled to take effect in 2018.
MAMM founder Lynnette Shaw, who plans to re-open the dispensary, one of California's oldest, told the East Bay Express her case signals "the end of the medical marijuana war." She said the DOJ's capitulation "means that so long as the Rohrabacher-Farr amendment remains in effect, the Department of Justice will be barred from expending funds to target medical cannabis businesses that operate in compliance with state law," which she called "a victory for everybody."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Is this the Mourning Lynx?
*peers about*
Is that a lynx with a black arm band?
Also, why no anally inclined Mexicans?
Thanks for the good news Jacob.
Under the US Constitution, the executive branch can't take money out of the Treasury unless Congress has appropriated the money - so if there's a ban on certain kinds of expenditure, then of course violating the ban would be unconstitutional.
So the officials who wanted to take money out of the Treasury and spend it in violation of the Rohrabacher-Farr amendment were trying to steal money in violation of the Constitution.
So it's like a bunch of robbers walked into a bank waving guns and demanding money, but then walking out once the police arrive.
In such situations, you don't just let the robbers walk away, you go after them.
Impeachment at the very least.
Would. Yes, MAMM.
Would. Yes, MAMM.
I like comparison with bunch of robbers: it reflects the situation so precisely! Nevertheless, taking into account how much time it takes to congress to decide on these issues related with medical marijuana supply I would not hope for a quick reaction. There is something interesting on this topic at pimion.com also.