Bernie Sanders Is Not The First Major-Party Presidential Candidate To Say Marijuana Should Be Legal
But he has had a bigger impact than the others.

The other day I described Bernie Sanders as "the first major-party presidential candidate to endorse marijuana legalization at the state level and descheduling at the federal level." That's true if you focus on the current election cycle. But as I explain in my latest Forbes column, at least one Democrat and one Republican have previously endorsed marijuana legalization while seeking a presidential nomination:
Last Saturday, three days after Bernie Sanders unveiled legislation to repeal the federal ban on marijuana, Hillary Clinton proposed moving marijuana to a slightly less restrictive legal category. The former secretary of state's faint echo of the Vermont senator's bold bill—the first of its kind in the Senate—underlined how timid Clinton has always been on the subject of drug policy reform. Although the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee has had second thoughts about the mandatory minimum sentences she used to champion, the woman who a few years ago explained that we can't legalize the drug trade because "there is just too much money in it" clearly is not ready to call off the war on weed, even though that is what most Americans seem to want.
The dueling marijuana proposals also showed that Sanders, whose chances of winning his party's presidential nomination are remote at best, is nevertheless pushing Clinton to address issues she would prefer to ignore. Marijuana legalization is especially popular among Democrats, and her proposal to facilitate medical studies by reclassifying the drug looks like a bone for primary voters who might embarrass her by favoring Sanders, who in some recent polls has drawn support from a third of Democrats.
While Sanders is having a noticeable impact on the drug policy debate within his party, he is not the first major-party presidential candidate to say marijuana should be legal.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So basically everything would be illegal except pot?
And abortion!
(I'm OK with both, but it is weird focus)
Don't forget ass-sex.
Or "undocumented" immigration (and, presumably, the attendant identity theft/fraud)!
Baby steps.
Legalizing anything beyond weed still has pretty low support. Restricting legalization efforts to just that is probably just realism at this point. It also reflects the fact that most people probably don't support legalization based on individual rights and autonomy, but because weed is relatively harmless and popular.
Yep. I'm happy for the small victory here, but it's very important to keep in mind that public sentiment has shifted more because nearly everyone born after 1950 knows pot is pretty much harmless, and not because of some personal liberty epiphany.
To get other drugs legal, 1st we have to make them popular. To help make them popular, we have to get penalties for having them reduced, & we have to discover they're safe, or successfully hide evidence of their dangers.
Free pot rations in every gulag!
But Bernie has refused to endorse our right to take any drug we want. More or less proof to me that this is probably just a political stance.
Funny ruling statement
http://thelibertarianrepublic......azing-way/
Ha. That's awesome.
But that stuff is nothing new, Taylor Swift just swiftied it.
http://forums.kingdomofloathin.....p?t=186084
I didn't see Staters gonna State
Boom
Damn it, Julie Borowski, I want to like you...
Given the title and lead of this article and the fact that it excerpted Sullum's Forbes article, why did I have to click through to find the actual answer -- Mike Gravel and Gary Johnson? Aren't those names the entire point of the article?
No the entire point of the article is to get people to click through as many times as possible before apathy outweighs curiosity.
Do you internet, brah?
I'm sure there've been plenty of major party presidential candidates you never heard of who said mj should be legal.
Too big to fail?
Forgive the double-mansplain, but she means the Clinton's don't profit from legalization.
This is Sanders' speech.
(Check your workplace rules before playing this. Hint - if you run a shop which sells T-shirts and incense to college students you can probably crank this up as loud as you want)
Goats love to play with it.
Keep your sex habits to yourself.
Singers smoke it. And players of instruments too.
Looks like we're going to have to outlaw hand sanitizer.
http://nbc4i.com/2015/11/13/di.....sanitizer/
Nah. We'll just poison it with methanol.
It's for the toddlers' own good.
I don't think you want to put a lot of methanol on your skin.
But if it saves just one child (by blinding him or poisoning his liver, I guess), it's worth it.
Sometimes you gotta break a few eggs.
Sometimes you gotta break a few legs. - Mafia Don.
Old Man Yells at Cloud.
He always looks like Statler or Waldorf, minus any shred of humor
The party of cool, diverse, young people
The billionaihhh clas