Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Policy

No, Sex Trafficking Isn't a Misdemeanor in Maryland

Unless you think all prostitution is sex trafficking...

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 8.6.2015 3:15 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Maryland Human Trafficking Task Force
(Maryland Human Trafficking Task Force)
Maryland Human Trafficking Task Force/Facebook

A four-part series from Capital News Service (CNS) looks at human trafficking in Maryland. The last part, published yesterday, contends that "Maryland has some of the lightest penalties in the nation for human trafficking of adults, which police officers and advocates say draws traffickers into the state." Yet a bill to enhance criminal penalties for human-trafficking offences recently failed to pass the Maryland General Assembly. 

It was a rare moment of legislative sanity on this issue. In recent years, just about any proposal billed as a way to get tough on human trafficking has enjoyed hasty, bipartisan success in states across the country. But as Maryland's failed bill illustrates, these policies are often far from what they're portrayed as by police and mainstream media. 

In this case, advocates for the increased penalties claim that sex trafficking of adults is a mere misdemeanor in Maryland. CNS reports that traffickers who get caught are often back out on the streets in a few hours, and at most they'll wind up with a small fine and a year imprisonment. "We're actually talking to these guys on the street who are trafficking (adults) and they're not even scared of us," Sgt. Deborah Flory of the State Police's Child Recovery Unit told CNS. "They're very aware of what the laws are in certain states they travel to."

So how could I, or anyone, possibly be against increasing the penalties? Because Flory et al. aren't really talking about human trafficking. They're talking about prostitution. Which they want felony punishments for. 

As is stands, using force, fraud, or coercion to compel anyone into sexual activity or performance is a felony offense in Maryland. So is harboring, helping, or benefiting from the prostitution of someone under 18, even when no force or coercion are involved. Both are punishable by up to 25 years in prison and/or a $15,000 fine. 

Meanwhile, "misdemeanor human trafficking" is punishable by up to 10 years in prison and a fine of up to $5,000. And what does this category entail? Basically anything at all related to non-forced prostitution except being the one doing the selling or the buying. This includes "taking or causing another to be taken to any place for prostitution" (so, driving a sex worker to a job),  encouraging or "plac(ing) another in any place for prostitution" (recruiting someone into sex work), harboring someone in a place of prostitution (letting a sex worker work from your home or building), "benefiting financially or receiving anything of value" from prostitution (taking money from a sex worker for any reason), or aiding and abetting someone in prostitution in any way.

Sure, all of those activities could also describe actions taken by sex traffickers as commonly understood, but then an element of force, fraud, or coercion would also be involved, and that is already defined as a felony. 

Two other offenses in the misdemeanor category do fall under the traditional purview of human trafficking: convincing someone they'll be physically harmed if they don't take part in prostitution or "a sexually explicit performance," and keeping someone's immigration documents or passport from them so they'll do so. But keep in mind that, though misdemeanors, these activities are still punishable by up to 10 years in prison. What's more, these actions seem to pretty clearly fall under the category of using force, fraud, or coercion to compel prostitution, so these particular charges are most likely things that would be brought in addition to felony trafficking (or abduction, or sexual assault, etc.) charges. 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: 7 Things to Watch For in Tonight's GOP Presidential Debate

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

PolicyNanny StateSex WorkSex TraffickingCriminal JusticeWar on WomenMaryland
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (16)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. sarcasmic   10 years ago

    Unless you think all prostitution is sex trafficking...

    That's the narrative.

    1. Loki   10 years ago

      Yep. All prostitution is "sex trafficking" because no right minded woman would ever voluntarily exchange sexual favors for money.

      All heterosexual sex is rape because no right minded woman would ever consent to sex with a man.

      The key words being "right minded", which by definition excludes those womyn suffering from false consciousness as a result of THE PATRIARCHY'S propaganda.

      So sayeth the SJWs.

    2. LarryA   10 years ago

      "It's just so much easier to protect people from sexual exploitation when they're in prison."

      [hurl]

    3. croaker   10 years ago

      Meanwhile, ISIS executed 19 women for refusing to spread their legs for soldiers.

  2. RobM   10 years ago

    But what about penalties for Fisting?

  3. Illocust   10 years ago

    Wonder if support could be gotten behind a movement to renaming all these sex laws with more accurate titles. For example prostitution might be "Consensual Sexual Acts for Monetary Gain".

    1. Citizen X   10 years ago

      Doesn't that also describe an awful lot of marriages?

      1. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

        +1 Kardashian Trump Mrs. Almanian

      2. JWatts   10 years ago

        Well obviously we need a delimiter. Maybe we could call it "Consensual Sexual Acts for Monetary Capital Gain" if it's more than a year.

    2. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

      Pimping: Kind hearted aid provided to working women

      The sex-trafficking nut jobs love to throw the word 'pimp' around in a context where it basically applies to anyone who has ever helped a prostitute to find work in any way or has advertised her services.

      1. croaker   10 years ago

        Hell, I haven't seen a real stereotypical pimp since I moved out of DC. Is 14th Street NW still a regular hangout?

  4. Irish ?s ESB   10 years ago

    "benefiting financially or receiving anything of value" from prostitution (taking money from a sex worker for any reason)

    Look Liz, you can't just let a brothel's accountant off with a misdemeanor. Clearly he's some sort of pimp and ought to be tossed in jail for a decade or two.

    1. Dark Lord of the wood chipper   10 years ago

      Stupid anti-pimping laws.

  5. Je suis Woodchipper   10 years ago

    How do you use fraud to traffick someone? Asking for a friend.

  6. Almanian - Trump's Woodchipper   10 years ago

    You're implying all prostitution ISN'T human trafficking??

    /progderp

  7. Rich   10 years ago

    benefiting from the prostitution of someone under 18

    Those pimps had jolly well better not be paying taxes or buying anything!

    #AllInThisTogether

  8. Robert   10 years ago

    10 yrs.? Md.'s got some extreme ideas about misdemeanors!

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Trump's Travel Crackdown Is Hurting Americans at Home and Abroad

Matt Welch | From the August/September 2025 issue

Superman Is About the Anti-War Vibe Shift

Matthew Petti | 7.18.2025 5:23 PM

Why Are Students Using AI To Cheat? Maybe Because They Shouldn't Be In College At All

Emma Camp | 7.18.2025 4:00 PM

Although Meth Is Irresistible, The New York Times Says, Addicts Often Prefer Small Cash Rewards

Jacob Sullum | 7.18.2025 1:45 PM

ICE Is Shipping Detainees to Hawaii as Bed Space on the U.S. Mainland Fills Up

Autumn Billings | 7.18.2025 1:24 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!