Anchorage Opens the Door to Cannabis Cafés
Local legislators ban consumption in "public places," except for licensed premises.
Beginning on February 24, thanks to a ballot initiative approved last November, Alaskans 21 and older will no longer face criminal penalties for marijuana possession (up to an ounce), sharing (ditto), or cultivation (up to six plants, half of them mature). Lest the streets be filled with happy tokers celebrating their new freedom, the Anchorage Assembly yesterday unanimously passed an ordinance that bans marijuana consumption in "public places," including "places of business or amusement." But unlike the Denver City Council, which has not seen fit to allow cannabis consumption in any business open to the public, the Anchorage Assembly approved an amendment that makes an exception for consumption "authorized by a state permit or license or authorized by a municipal permit or lease." That provision leaves open the possibility of businesses that cater to people, including tourists, who want to use marijuana in a setting other than a private residence.
Measure 2, Alaska's legalization initiative, says "it is unlawful to consume marijuana in public" and prescribes a $100 civil fine for violators, but it does not define public. The Anchorage Assembly settled on a broad definition that nevertheless contemplates cannabis cafés. Depending on how the state legislature decides to regulate marijuana retailers (which are not expected to start opening until next year), those cafés might sell marijuana products alongside food and beverages, à la Amsterdam's "coffee shops," or they might be limited to nonintoxicating refreshments for customers who bring their own marijuana. Either way, tolerating such businesses will help avoid a conundrum faced by visitors to Colorado and Washington, where the rules governing consumption are fuzzy and in some jurisdictions highly restrictive. "We voted to control it like alcohol," Joanne Henning of the Alaska Cannabis Association told the Ancorage Assembly, which last December overwhelmingly rejected a ban on marijuana shops. "We want a safe place to consume it like alcohol."
Colorado's legalization measure, Amendment 64, leaves in place a state ban on "consumption that is conducted openly and publicly," the meaning of which is a matter of dispute. Washington's I-502 prohibits consumption "in view of the general public," which is also open to interpretation. Both states, unlike Alaska, explicitly ban consumption of marijuana on the premises of businesses that sell it. Oregon's Measure 91 excludes consumption in any "public place," defined as "a place to which the general public has access," which seems to rule out anything like cannabis cafés, except perhaps for member-only clubs.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Alaskans 21 and older will no longer face criminal penalties for ... cultivation (up to six plants, half of them mature).
I daresay Alaskans 21 and older had jolly well better not be cultivating five plants, three of them mature.
What? Why would 5 be a problem? The language says "up to 6 only 3 may be flowering(mature)" up to means 0 to 6.
He was making fun of the inaccurate description which he quoted. 3 is greater than half of 5.
Alaska is the only U.S. state I haven't visited and written about. Looks like that's about to change!
It's an awesome state!!! Especially great in mid to late July. 🙂
Up to I looked at the check for $4922 , I didnt believe that...my... friend was truly bringing in money parttime from there pretty old laptop. . there great aunt haz done this for under thirteen months and a short time ago paid for the dept on there cottage and bought a gorgeous Honda .
have a peek at this web-site ????????? http://www.jobsfish.com
Why should it be under as much control as something as deadly as alcohol?
According to DrugRehabs.Org, national (USA) mortality figures for 2009 were: tobacco 435,000; poor diet and physical inactivity 365,000; alcohol 85,000; microbial agents 75,000; toxic agents 55,000; motor vehicle crashes 26,347; adverse reactions to prescription drugs 32,000; suicide 30,622; incidents involving firearms 29,000; homicide 20,308; sexual behaviors 20,000; all illicit drug use, direct and indirect 17,000; and marijuana 0.
Researchers led by Professor David Nutt, a former chief drugs adviser to the British government, asked drug-harm experts to rank 20 drugs (legal and illegal) on 16 measures of harm to the user and to wider society, such as damage to health, drug dependency, economic costs and crime. Alcohol scored 72 out of a possible 100, far more damaging than heroin (55) or crack cocaine (54). It is the most harmful to others by a wide margin, and is ranked fourth behind heroin, crack, and methamphetamine (crystal meth) for harm to the individual.