District of Cannabis
How will Congress respond to marijuana legalization in the nation's capital?

Of the three jurisdictions where voters approved marijuana legalization in November, Washington, D.C., is the smallest but the most symbolically potent. The prospect of legal marijuana in the nation's capital dramatically signals the ongoing collapse of the 78-year-old ban on a much-maligned plant.
The passage of Initiative 71, which voters backed by a 2-to-1 margin, presents a challenge to the Republicans who now control both houses of Congress. Will they respect democracy and local control, or will they insist that Washingtonians toe a prohibitionist line that is steadily disappearing?
Initiative 71 allows adults 21 or older to possess two ounces or less of marijuana, grow up to six plants at home, and transfer up to an ounce at a time to other adults "without remuneration." It does not authorize commercial production and distribution, but the D.C. Council is considering legislation that would. "I see no reason why we wouldn't follow a regime similar to how we regulate and tax alcohol," incoming Mayor Muriel Bowser said after the election.
The initiative does not take effect until after D.C. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson submits it to Congress for review. Congress then has 30 days to pass a joint resolution overriding the initiative.
Congress also can try to stop legalization by barring the D.C. Council from spending money to implement it. For more than a decade, legislators used that technique to block a medical marijuana initiative that voters approved in 1998.
Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.), who unsuccessfully tried to prevent the D.C. Council from decriminalizing marijuana possession last summer, said he will "consider using all resources available to a member of Congress" to stop legalization. He might have more luck this time, since his earlier amendment passed the House but not the Senate, which now has a Republican majority.
Then again, the House last May approved an amendment introduced by Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.) that was aimed at stopping the federal government from undermining medical marijuana laws. The amendment, which attracted votes from 49 Republicans in addition to 170 Democrats, explicitly applied to D.C. as well as the 23 states that let patients use marijuana for symptom relief.
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), the new chairman of a committee that oversees the District, believes Congress should respect the will of the voters who approved Initiative 71. "I think there should be a certain amount of discretion for both states and territories and the District," Paul told reporters on Election Day. "I'm not for having the federal government get involved."
The D.C. Cannabis Campaign, which backed Initiative 71, hopes that even Republicans who still associate marijuana with the 1960s counterculture will see the merits of local autonomy. "What we want is for Phil Mendelson to transfer the initiative when the new Congress is seated," says Nikolas Schiller, the campaign's director of communications. "We believe that a new Republican Congress will not interfere with something that deals solely with personal liberties."
Principles aside, there are political reasons for Republicans to avoid defining themselves as pot prohibitionists. Several recent polls indicate most Americans favor legalization, and support is especially strong among younger voters. A 2013 Gallup survey found that retirees were the only age group in which most people still supported prohibition.
"With marijuana legal in the federal government's backyard," says Tom Angell of the anti-prohibitionist group Marijuana Majority, "it's going to be increasingly difficult for national politicians to continue ignoring the growing majority of voters who want to end prohibition. I've been saying for a while that 2016 presidential candidates need to start courting the cannabis constituency, and now the road to the White House quite literally travels through legal marijuana territory."
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "District of Cannabis."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
'''Congress also can try to stop legalization by barring the D.C. Council from spending money to implement it.'''
This is my favorite part. Why should it be necessary to spend any significant amount of money to STOP enforcing prohibition? How much exactly will it cost to tell the police "Hey, stop throwing people in cages for having pot?"
How much exactly will it cost to tell the police "Hey, stop throwing people in cages for having pot?"
For starters, on the order of $100K per employee to be trained in the new way of business, plus severance pay for the enforcers who have to be let go, plus the cost of psychological counseling for the depressed drug warriors. IOW, a *lot*.
That email doesn't come cheap (for government employees).
Or will they just tow the lion?
Sorry, the trailer hitch broke, we can't tow anything.
Libertarians are just Republicans that smoke weed.
//prog
Also, I don't expect team red to let ending prohibition go quietly into the night.
"Just look at what happened to our once great nation when a man who smoked pot as a youth became president!"
You know, they may have a point there...
You mean the same man who didn't know what 'is' is?
Rich -- Are you referring to Clinton, Bush or Obama?
How will Congress respond to marijuana legalization in the nation's capital?
Hysterically.
I think that DC submitted the proposal to the Congress on Jan 13, so the date to watch should be Feb 12 or 13.
Get Paid Up To $23.75 Per hour http://www.Work4Hour.Com
- No Experience Necessary
- Beginners preferred
- No websites needed
- No CPA
- No PPC
- No One Click Wonder
- No Fake Gurus
- JUST REAL RESULTS
Click Here For Details
Oh, piss off.
do you supply the donkey and video camera for $23.75/hr?
Aren't they caught between a rock and a hard place on this?
If they set up popular votes on initiatives they can't very well invalidate them or make law contrary to them. I am not sure what a passed initiative has for standing relative to what congress says, but it seems to me they have no choice but to respect it or say FYTW to the voters faces. Since they are not accountable to those voters they shouldn't have much problem doing that.
I am not sure what a passed initiative has for standing relative to what congress says,
Its law unless Congress says otherwise.
Why does D.C. even have to go to congress for approval - it's not even a State - why does it have any legislative government above local city/town?
Well, it's federal property.
In spite of whatever Home Rule rhetoric various Congresscritters may have spouted over the years, Congress considers, and has always considered, the District their personal playpen. That was the tragedy of Marion Barry; the only actual authority he had was to malfease. In another smallish Southern city he might have been a decent elected official. Other Black Activists made the switch from agitator to politician and did well. Barry never had a chance to be a good mayor, because he never had a chance to be mayor.
Get Paid Up To $23.75 Per hour ???????? w?w?w.W?i?k?i-Careers.C?o??m
- No Experience Necessary
- Beginners preferred
- No websites needed
- No CPA
- No PPC
- No One Click Wonder
- No Fake Gurus
- JUST REAL RESULTS
Click Here For Details
my buddy's step-sister makes $89 hourly on the laptop . She has been fired for 8 months but last month her income was $16413 just working on the laptop for a few hours. Get the facts.........
http://www.Jobsyelp.com
Of course the GOP, with pressure from the Evangelicals and Christian Right, will want to continue their War on Pot as they want to continue their War on Women and War on Gays.
The only thing these wars accomplish is to send droves of once registered Republicans over to the Libertarians and Democrats. The problem with this is these Religious Cultists are handing our country over to the Socialists. All of our offspring will be living the lifestyle of the 1950s Russians.
If only we could put all of the Evangelicals and Christian Right in a box and send them to China.
Am I the only one who giggled at "joint resolution"?!
Super powerful, rare earth, magnetic rods for you to play with.
Make sculptures, puzzles, patterns, shapes, jewelry . . . the joy is endless.
Totally compatible with all other BuckyBall sets!
Each set comes with a little carrying case too.
each BuckyBall is 5mm in diameter
cube: 1 ?" high x 1 ?" wide x 1 ?" diameter
For adults only. ? These are so super strong, they should be kept away from children.