Boston City Employees Banned From Criticizing Olympics
Boston hasn't even been awarded the 2024 Olympics yet, and many of its citizens are already having their civil liberties violated.
Boston hasn't even been awarded the 2024 Olympics yet, and many of its citizens are already having their civil liberties violated.
Documents obtained through a public rerecords request by MassLive show that Boston mayor Mayor Martin J. Walsh signed an agreement with the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) that prevents city employees from publicly saying anything negative about the Olympics, the International Olympic Committee (IOC), or the USOC. On top of that, employees are also required to actively promote the games.
Here is the exact passage in question:
The City, including its employees, officers and representatives, shall not make, publish or communicate to any Person, or communicate in any public forum, any comments or statements (written or oral) that reflect unfavorably upon, denigrate or disparage, or are detrimental to the reputation or statute of, the IOC, the IPC, the USOC, the IOC Bid, the Bid Committee or the Olympic or Paralympic movement. The City, including its employees, officers and representatives, shall each promote the Bid Committee, the USOC, the IOC Bid, U.S. Olympics and Paralympics athletes and hopefuls and the Olympic and Paralympic movement in a positive manner.
Walsh administration Communications Director Laura Oggeri later walked back the report, saying the mayor has no intention of suppressing the speech of city employees, and claiming that such verbiage is merely standard procedure in the USOC agreement that bid cities are forced to sign.
It looks, then, as though Boston citizens can continue to freely go about being extremely lukewarm about the prospect of potentially handing over billions of taxpayer dollars to a multibillion-dollar sports organization.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
But what if they have more than a feeling about the Olympics?
Smokin' pun there, Counterfly.
Smokin' pun
Hoax device!
Puns are basic evil, but putting that vapid ear-worm in my head makes you comparable to Nikki!
I once participated on a bar trivia team named Brad Delp's Bathroom BBQ. We were tasteless young rascals, but very good at bar trivia.
Then they can discuss it until they see Marianne walk away.
*narrows gaze*
Well it's been such a long time since they had the games.
Well it hasn't been their week, their month, or even their year.
Let me take you home tonight.
Cool the engines, buddy!
Then they have to repeat the official Boston city employees' politically acceptable response to questions about the Olympic bid:
We'll open the door
Do anything that we decide to
And I know that there's something that's just out of sight
And I feel like I'm finally seeing the light
Holdin' on girl I know it's right
I know it's right
We're ready!
Are they going to send Obama to lobby for the olympics again?
Considering his track record, I would be all for making that his full-time job.
And he can take Oprah with him, look how well that worked for Chi.... um....
Feature, not bug
It did work for Chicago. Winning the Olympics would have been an even bigger disaster for the city.
But the graft opportunities! You know how many beaks will go unwetted now??!!?!
It will be the job for our next President. President Warren?
SHUT YOUR MOUTH!
But I'm talkin' about Lizzie!
Zevon? Nice...
I imagine that the IOC conference room resembles the war room in Dr. Strangelove, without the funny shenanigans, of course.
And lots more hookers and bribe money.
Five ring light fixture instead of one big one, gold medals used as coasters...
Oh, with plenty of funny shenanigans, just not intentionally funny ones.
When SF was 'in the running' (thank you, Boston taxpayers!) there were articles about the terms in the contract.
According to the articles, the IOC poo-bahs make rock-and-rollers look like pikers when specifying the goodies.
I'm sure the clauses for hookers specs hair-color, waist size, bust size, toe-nail color, etc.
Free cocktail party, everyone greeting them has to smile, free cell phones and service, etc, etc.
I think the cell phone part is actually part of the IOC contract.
I think all those were.
A selection from "IOC reportedly made some ridiculous demands to help push Oslo out of 2022 Winter Olympics bidding":
Ban the Olympics.
I love Boston.
the mayor has no intention of suppressing the speech of city employees, and claiming that such verbiage is merely standard procedure in the USOC agreement that bid cities are forced to sign.
So the mayor is either (a) committing fraud by signing the agreement or (b) planning to suppress the speech of city employees.
A little bit of A and a little bit of B i suppose
As I noted yesterday...
BOSTON WRONG!
It's Boston. All of A and all of B.
"So the mayor is either (a) committing fraud by signing the agreement or (b) planning to suppress the speech of city employees."
Yes, I believe so.
Boston wants to be known as "San Franciso on the Atlantic" apparently.
YOU GOT TO GIT YORE MIND RIGHT, BOY
When the IOC is involved, everyone is San Francisco.
Sorry, that makes no sense.
I rather think it does - hugely expensive, haughty and highly political.
"Everyone is San Francisco" as in everyone is getting fucked in the ass with a pine dildo covered in Tiger Balm.
Boston is the only city which can't even bitch about NYC
I mean, san francisco is pretty, has a lot of hippies and gays and socialists. Their retarded-level is entirely expected.
Boston's just a bunch of assholes with no excuse.
Hey! I know at least 4 people in Boston who aren't assholes. I only know 3 in New York.
I will give bostonians credit for one thing = in manhattan, chicago, La, etc. you can find "boston bars", where expatriates from boston congregate (usually to watch the sox)
There is no comparable thing for any other city in the US. No one from NY really gives much of a shit about other new yorkers. Or people from anywhere else. There isn't quite the same kind of "hometown spirit"
Its probably because they're all assholes though. Just a theory!
(*one of my best friends is a bostonian. I think he proposed this theory to me)
"I will give bostonians credit for one thing = in manhattan, chicago, La, etc. you can find "boston bars", where expatriates from boston congregate (usually to watch the sox)"
In SF, there is the "Connecticut Yankee" bar/grill. It will be noisy come 2/1/15.
There is a little of that with Chicagoans....but primarily in Arizona that I know of.
Maybe more Bostonians left town because they didn't really like living there.
The math checks out.
Hey I have lots of excuses!
Boston has Provincetown...
P-Town is two hours away. Hardly right around the corner.
Wouldn't it be great if government could do this with ALL the ways it takes other people's money and throws it down the toilet?
If I work for a company and go around bad-mouthing the company's clients the company is perfectly within its rights to fire my ass. Same for Boston city employees.
I don't see a problem here unless they are being prosecuted.
The City, including its employees, officers and representatives, shall each promote the Bid Committee, the USOC, the IOC Bid, U.S. Olympics and Paralympics athletes and hopefuls and the Olympic and Paralympic movement in a positive manner.
The rejoicing is forced, created under threat, as in Boris Godunov. It's as if someone were beating you with a stick and saying, "Your business is rejoicing, your business is rejoicing," and you rise, shaky, and go marching off, muttering, "Our business is rejoicing, our business is rejoicing."
You know who else stifled dissent when the Olympics was in town?
King Gustav V?
(Gah, threading!)
Zeus?
I think I should have said, "The Oracle of Delphi".
Edith Bunker?
You know who else had a bunker?
Boston?
Generalissimo Francisco Franco?
Every other Olympics host city ever?
Mitt Romney?
King Gustav V?
So city employees can't say anything that would "reflect unfavorably upon, denigrate or disparage, or are detrimental to the reputation or statute of" the Olympic pooh-bahs.
What about whistleblowers? If some civil servant reveals that the IOC is overcharging, or is billing hookers to its "entertainment" account, will that civil servant end up spending his/her life in exile in Russia?
Note to IOC lawyers: I said "if."
The IOC cannot overcharge, as the local Olympic committee and host city are responsible for all their bills.
anything that makes Bostonians shut-up is fine with me.
...such verbiage is merely standard procedure in the USOC agreement that bid cities are forced to sign.
Show me the IOC goon with the gun.
the USOC agreement that bid cities are forced to sign.
What would USUCK do if you just lined out that provision, signed it, and sent it in?
I don't mind Boston bidding on Olympics. But I think all watchdogs need to be on high alert to make sure Boston is not bribing those crooked IOC members and Boston has not promised to undertake wasteful
projects. Cities should stop kowtowing to the IOC.