Help the Cops Chill Out

How law enforcement can be made more compatible with Americans' liberty.


An Associated Press poll conducted last month found that the police killings of Michael Brown and Eric Garner, which led to protests in Ferguson, New York City, and around the country, ranked as the "top news story of 2014." Nevertheless, the issue of police brutality is not new and, despite the new interest from mainstream media, wasn't much of an issue in the 2014 elections, even locally.

Some of that was a function of one-party politics and incumbency. The St. Louis county prosecutor, Bob McCulloch, a Democrat first elected in 1991, was re-elected with no opposition. His conduct in the grand jury surrounding the death of Michael Brown shouldn't have been a surprise. In one of his first cases as county prosecutor, McCulloch defended cops who shot at two unarmed men 21 times because the victims were alleged drug dealers. Optimistically, it's not just police brutality that isn't a new issue but police and criminal justice reforms too. If the sometimes confused but widespread focus on the former can translate to enough interest in the latter, it could make 2015 the year of reform. Here are a few ideas that would help cops chill out:

Decriminalization of inherently non-violent behavior

Eric Garner's death at the hands of police trying to arrest him for allegedly selling loose, untaxed cigarette helped give birth to the "Black Lives Matter" slogan used by many protesters and activists. In response, police apologists bring up Pantaleo's black supervisor.

Pantaleo and the other plainclothes cops on that Staten Island street that day, in fact, were specifically ordered to crack down on the sales of loose, untaxed cigarettes. The sale of loosies is basically tax resistance. Dedicating plainclothes officers to target the loosie market, even under the pretext of the broken windows theory, seems questionable at best. Not all instances of excessive force by police end in death, but a lot begin as interactions over inherently non-violent behavior, like selling loose cigarettes, grilling on the sidewalk in front of your home, or, most likely, drugs.

Before Eric Garner, the most widely protested police killing in New York City was that of Ramarley Graham, shot after being chased over a small amount of marijuana. A grand jury indicted Richard Haste, the officer who shot Graham but a judge threw the indictment out because the prosecutor hadn't informed the grand jury that Haste was told by other cops that Graham might have a gun. Graham didn't have a gun but a second grand jury declined to re-indict Haste.

When I spoke to Bronx Councilman Andy King, who represents the area where Graham was shot and who attached himself to protests over the teenager's death, he flat out admitted that he believed if New York City police officers targeted more young white males suspected of making illegal drug purchases that would lend police activities in his community more credibility. King, like much of the establishment, Democrat or Republican, even in a "liberal" bastion like New York City, supports the concept of a war on drugs.

Yet prohibition of drugs creates the environment not just for a lot of the excessive force used by police but also the street violence that provides the political motivation for more police presence in the first place. Prohibition today, as it did with alcohol in the 1920s, excludes drug entrepreneurs from many of the avenues available to resolve business disputes and protect business interests legally. Ending drug prohibition would remove a lot of the incentive for violence, which would allow police resources to shift to other, inherently violent crimes. When your average young male, black or white, who may be profiled as a user of drugs, is no longer a low-hanging target of law enforcement, a lot of the potential for deadly police encounters can be removed.

Transparency and accountability through surveillance and oversight

Body cameras have been the it-thing for many of the people who started to focus on issues of police reform in the wake of Ferguson. Body cameras, as well as cameras on lapels and helmets, have been used in police departments around the country for years. Reportedly, the Ferguson police department had purchased body cameras before the shooting of Michael Brown but they weren't yet in use. And the Ferguson police department didn't even have dash cams, a type of camera that's become almost ubiquitous in American policing and which, when operating, can add valuable information to what happened in a questionable police encounter. Police are still resistant to dash cameras: WTSP in Tampa Bay found most law enforcement agencies in West/Central Florida didn't have them and that cops didn't want them. Neither, for example, does the city of Philadelphia have dash cams.

Body cams can add even more valuable information. The case for body cameras is a strong one; it provides an additional record of police encounter with "civilians," leading to less complaints about excessive force. But neither dash cams or body cams, alone or together, are sufficient to get transparency out of a police department. Video evidence, not from a police camera, didn't help a grand jury indict anyone in the death of Eric Garner. More troublingly, neither has the video evidence appeared to have led to any serious disciplinary measures against any of the police officers involved.

Transparency, and the accountability that's supposed to come with it, can only be achieved with effective, independent oversight of police. That's a difficult task. When Michael Bell's son was shot and killed by police in Wisconsin while he was handcuffed, Bell filed a lawsuit. After six years the city agreed to a settlement—one tool governments use to avoid police accountability. Bell used the settlement to lobby for an independent commission to review police shootings, and a new law was finally passed this April. When the mentally ill Dontre Hamilton was shot 14 times by Officer Christopher Manney, who was the third cop to respond to the same call about a man sleeping on a park bench (the first two found no problem with Hamilton and moved on), it became the first case to fall under the new review mechanism. Manney was cleared of all charges. The Milwaukee Sentinel-Journal found that half of the state agents, including the lead, on the investigating team were former members of the Milwaukee Police Department.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) said it would conduct a civil rights review of the Hamilton case. Through its wider "pattern and practice" investigations, the DOJ is often the best placed to impose any kind of substantive accountability on police departments. In recent years the DOJ has conducted investigations in Albuquerque, which is plagued by decades of unconstitutional policing, Seattle, Cleveland, Newark, Miami, and law enforcement and corrections agencies around the country and in overseas territories.

But the DOJ's abilities are limited too. Philadelphia's police commissioner, Charles Ramsey, asked for a federal review in 2013. President Obama chose him to chair a task force on 21st century policing. Ramsey has tried to fire Officer Thomas Tolstoy, a man accused of three separate sexual assaults. Because local and federal prosecutors couldn't build a case against him, union rules prevent Ramsey from having the final word on Tolstoy's termination. "I'm stuck with a guy who shouldn't be a cop," he said in August.

Limiting the power of unions to use public safety as leverage

When two New York City police officers were murdered in cold blood by a Baltimore man who had earlier that day tried to kill his girlfriend, the city's police unions laid the blame on Mayor Bill de Blasio (D), who had been reaching out to protesters demanding police reform, some of whom used violent anti-cop rhetoric.

"There's blood on many hands tonight," Patrolmen's Benevolent Association President Patrick Lynch said just hours after the horrible crime. "Those that incited violence on the streets under the guise of protest that tried to tear down what NYPD officers did every day. We tried to warn it must not go on, it cannot be tolerated. That blood on the hands starts at City Hall in the office of the mayor."

Police officers told each other they were on a "wartime" footing now. One said it was "open fucking season" on cops. Police officers turned their backs on de Blasio when he arrived at the hospital where the shot cops were taken. Even a few rookies did it at graduation. One happy byproduct of this ugly reaction is that police officers in New York City have cut back tremendously on "minor offenses" citations and unnecessary arrests, implementing the first, and arguably most important step, in getting cops to chill out.

Too often, however, police unions work to produce rules that protect bad cops. And they use their importance to "public safety" to extract concessions that may have been impossible in a free negotiation. Tolstoy, the Philadelphia officer accused of sexual assault, and other misconduct, is protected in part by union rules first negotiated under Mayor Frank Rizzo, a Democrat-turned-Republican and former Philadelphia police chief.

In New York, the state legislature passed a police discipline bill this summer would that move more of the power to discipline cops to unions and their collective bargaining agreements—it would restore, for example the 48 hour window in which cops don't have to talk about what happened in a shooting that's become so well-known it appears in cop procedurals. The bill received just two no votes in the Senate and the Assembly, and all the members of the Black, Puerto Rican, Hispanic, and Asian Caucus who were present voted in favor of it. Before policing became a national news story, Cuomo was widely expected to sign it with little if any popular resistance. The Brooklyn NAACP is calling on Cuomo to veto the bill, which would set up a fight this year if the police unions and their supporters try to introduce the measure in the legislature again.

In California, Steven Greenhut has written about the dubious means which one police union in Costa Mesa went to in order to target politicians pushing for police reform, including false accusations of DUI. Police officers rely on the respect of the community to do their jobs. Their reputations allow them to do good, police work. When police unions leverage that respect to create rules that keep bad cops on the streets, they foster an environment of unconstitutional policing. In Baltimore one cop who reported police brutality says he found a dead rat on his windshield and was told by one union rep to find a job in another agency.

When it's possible to discipline and terminate cops not just when grand juries indict them for crimes but when there's the appearance of misconduct and evidence of a pattern of misconduct, it's possible to restore constitutional policing. Otherwise the bad cops become a problem throughout the law enforcement system.

NEXT: OK Bill Would Ban Hoodies, 'Ansel Adams Act' Would Protect Public Photography, 18 States 'Extremely Hostile' to Abortion: A.M. Links

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. …wasn’t much of an issue in the 2014 elections, even locally.

    It won’t be an issue unless one of the two individuals vying for a seat is willing to make it so. No one will piss off the heroes in blue.

    And, for the love of fuck, can we stop pretending the left wants to scale back the war on drugs, protect speech or safeguard civil liberties one iota? They want a strong state and you don’t have that by reining in its agents of compliance.

    1. Too many people buy the mythology. They believe the policeman works for them. He is their protector. Criticizing the policeman is like slapping them in the face. They’ll never grasp he works for the government. Suggesting that he is the enforcer for the politicians just makes you a cop hater.

      1. I’d love to see a political ad where the video of the Garner death is juxtaposed with scenes of the Sheriff of Nottingham’s men in different productions of Robin Hood.

      2. “Suggesting that he is the enforcer for the politicians just makes you a cop hater.”

        I get that crap from the “conservative” cop-suckers too. The truth is we are in the minority and this country is dead. Its entire image relies on lies, propaganda and a huge internal and external military.

  2. Help the Cops Chill Out

    Someone in the commentariat suggested replacing “in the line of duty” with “at work”.

    1. I believe the correct term is “patroling their sector”

  3. This article is dated Jan 6, 2015. Eh?

    1. That just means it will be featured in the May issue of Reason Magazine‘s print edition.

      1. But which year?

    2. I see someone changed ONE of the dates. Someone better tell someone there’s at least one more, somwehere…..

  4. If the police want to cosplay COINOPS, the least we can do is play the part of an insurgency.

    Jus’ sayin’

      1. Listen, when you have to face the danger that is Laotian-American toddlers on a daily basis, your shit better be in one bag, brother!

        1. Pray for them.

  5. End immunity.

  6. Force them to personally carry malpractice insurance.

  7. Randomly test LEOs on their knowledge of the law.

    1. They don’t know shit. They’re too busy raping prostitutes and stealing weed from drug dealers.

  8. Outlaw police unions (and fine with extending this to all government employee unions).

    Charges against cops automatically go to trial if the accuser insists, no dismissal by prosecutors or grand juries. Provisions to relocate the trial if the prosecutor isn’t interested in vigorously pursuing the case (i.e., always).

  9. In the immortal words of Lil’ Jon and the Eastside Boyz, “Don’t start no shit, won’t be no shit.”

    What Lil’ Jon was referring to is exactly what Matt Kibbe has been preaching for years, culminating in his book: Don’t Hurt People and Don’t Take Their Stuff.

    Unfortunately the State and their armed foot soldiers cannot abide by such principles as set forth by Lil’ Jon and Matt Kibbe–for it would cut into their earnings.

    The State manufactures many problems by creating absurd laws and regulations, then utilizes their armed thugs to swoop down like the vultures they are…escalating the situation, which only adds to the State’s thieving, err, revenue.

    The question is my fellow liberty-minded friends:

    What are we going to do about it?

  10. Want to make dashcams and body cams hugely popular with police? Establisg in law that, absent video evidence, when a cop,says one thing and a witness says another, all ties go,against the cop.

    It won’t be any more fair than the present presumption that goes the other way, but it’ll mKe the cops love their cameras.

  11. Make the police unions liable for any damages awarded against a city for actions taken by a cop they prevented the city from firing.

    Make harassing a citizen for taking video of cops in a public place a,firing offense. Write it into their goddamn contract, so they have no grounds to bitch about it.

    Withdraw all immunity from cops who do a dynamic entry raid with a warrant that later proves to be based on lies, or at the wrong address.

  12. It’s probably unworkable but I wouldn’t mind a requirement that any warrant that is based SOLELY on the word of a confidential informant require the CI to testify under oath in front of the issuing judge and the officer swear to their own belief in the veracity of the CI’s statements. CI’s and their “sponsor” officers should be aggressively prosecuted for perjury where and when evidence can be found and both should be exposed to direct civil liability, at least for instances of gross negligence or willful misconduct.

    1. And why would its unworkability be a flaw? If it killed the “Confidential Informant” racket dead as a doornail, that would be a FEATURE.

      1. Fair point. IMPLEMENT IMMEDIATELY.

    2. Literally every word ever spoken by a CI is a lie. Every single word. EVERY SINGLE WORD. I’d no more trust a CI than a post on 4chan.

  13. Hey you guys I have found the perfect job as a full time student, it has changed my life around! If you are self motivated and social media savvy then this is ideal for you. The sky is the limit, you get exactly how much work you put into to it.
    click on this link to get started and see for yourself????.
    ????? http://www.netcash50.com

  14. Just fire 3/4 of them. We don’t need this many cops. Fuck them and their stupid pensions.

  15. ”In California, Steven Greenhut has written about the dubious means which one police union in Costa Mesa went to in order to target politicians pushing for police reform, including false accusations of DUI. ”

    Cops in Edmonton, AB., did exactly this. Journalist Kerry Diotte was writing about their scandal-plagued department. They set up outside a downtown watering hole waiting to nab him for driving drunk. Except he didn’t drink, at least not that night. But they were such bumblers about it that the story made its way into all the papers and electronic media. The chief eventually resigned in disgrace. Diotte went on to become an alderman.

  16. I’m all for people helping murdering pigs chill out on a slab in the morgue.

  17. Totally compatible with all other BuckyBall sets!Each set comes with a little carrying case too.each buckyball is 5mm in diametercube: 1 ?” high x 1 ?” wide x 1 ?” diameterFor adults only. ? These are so super strong, they should be kept away from children.

  18. The specialist company is waiting for you now ????? ????? ??????? ??????? Walker. Cleaning, polishing and sneezing are done for the boards, no matter what the Council’s size and whatever the Council’s. And no matter how much you suffer from cleaning services just bring your blade immediately the company is now waiting for you to do whatever you wish and achieve the highest level of Accuracy, excellence ??????? quality and honesty we seek to reach anywhere in Saudi Arabia and make the best of your wishes in the to clean, feel free to communicate and contract with the best companies that do all of this in order to enjoy a clean, dust-free board.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.